Try Free

MAGA Woman Faces Off Against Young Progressive Man (ft. Dean Withers & Emily Wilson)

Jubilee April 5, 2026 58m 13,215 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of MAGA Woman Faces Off Against Young Progressive Man (ft. Dean Withers & Emily Wilson) from Jubilee, published April 5, 2026. The transcript contains 13,215 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Democrats shut down our country. People lost everything because of that. How is that funny? What, people losing everything is hilarious? Spare me the fake outrage. You responded to that by saying, what's funny, Dean? People are dying. Moments after, in the last topic that we debated, okay, saying..."

[0:00] Democrats shut down our country. [0:02] People lost everything because of that. [0:04] How is that funny? [0:05] What, people losing everything is hilarious? [0:07] Spare me the fake outrage. [0:09] You responded to that by saying, [0:10] what's funny, Dean? [0:11] People are dying. [0:12] Moments after, in the last topic that we debated, [0:15] okay, saying that this VA nurse [0:17] deserved to get murdered by 12 shots in the back [0:20] by a lawless ice thug. [0:22] Welcome to Face Off, [0:24] where two people debate four claims. [0:27] One clock, no interruptions. [0:29] Today, Dean Withers, a liberal political commentator [0:31] and debater, faces off against Emily Wilson, [0:34] a conservative media personality. [0:36] The clock starts now. [0:39] My first claim is, [0:40] Donald Trump's mass deportation is anti-American. [0:43] I would say the most American thing [0:46] would be protecting Americans. [0:48] I don't see anything un-American about it. [0:51] People are crying at ICE for doing their jobs. [0:53] They're intervening with ICE doing their jobs. [0:56] That's why they're getting shot and killed, [0:59] rightfully so. [0:59] I don't see anything un-American about it. [1:00] They're trying to defend ICE doing their jobs. [1:02] Both of those deaths of whatever their names were [1:05] could have been completely avoidable. [1:07] Probably better off without them, regardless. [1:11] And, yeah, I mean, Obama was like a, what, [1:14] 3.1 mass deportation? [1:18] Donald Trump, or not doing well, [1:20] probably like 890. [1:22] I mean, Biden was up there, like 1.1, [1:24] something like that. [1:24] So it's just the hypocrisy of it all. [1:27] It's like some people are against it, [1:29] some people are for it. [1:30] I want every single legal out of the country, [1:32] every single one, at any cost. [1:34] And then other than that, [1:35] I just think it's funny that when he does it, [1:37] it's different. [1:38] Kids in cages, all this stuff. [1:39] I mean, they've all been doing it, [1:40] so I just don't know why they care when Trump does it. [1:42] Well, there's actually a lot that you said there [1:44] that I want to touch on, [1:45] and I'm sure that we will during this topic. [1:47] And it's funny, because you actually brought up [1:49] one of the main reasons why his mass deportation [1:52] has been so anti-American within your first breath. [1:54] You said there's nothing anti-American [1:57] about protecting citizens, [1:58] and then you brought up an example of ICE [2:00] executing a citizen on the streets of this country. [2:03] Of course, you went on to say [2:04] that it was completely justified [2:05] and that we're better off without them. [2:07] Let's go ahead and focus in on one of the three citizens [2:09] who has been murdered by ICE, [2:11] and that will be Alex Preddy. [2:12] So first, you made a very bold claim. [2:15] A man lost his life, a mother lost his son, [2:18] a father lost his son, [2:19] a hospital lost one of their nurses, [2:23] and I think the world lost a good man. [2:25] And your takeaway is, we're better off without them, [2:27] and that the shooting's justified. [2:30] Finally, tell me, what is the legal standard [2:33] that authorizes an LEO in engaging in the use [2:36] of lethal force, ending the life of an American? [2:39] I don't know, go ahead and tell me. [2:41] If you don't know the legal standard [2:42] that justifies a shooting, [2:43] then why the hell are you sitting here [2:45] saying the shooting was justified? [2:47] The shooting is justified because we see who they are, [2:49] all the information comes out of it. [2:51] Oh, he was a loving, same with the woman that got shot. [2:53] Oh, he was a loving son. [2:54] First of all, everyone was worried about him. [2:57] You see the text coming out, [2:58] oh, we were worried about his mental health. [2:59] He couldn't go to work anymore, he wasn't able [3:01] to practice as a nurse. [3:03] This whole thing of every time someone dies, [3:05] the Democrats act like they're this amazing person, [3:07] it's just not true. [3:08] They even had to Photoshop the photo of him [3:10] to make him seem normal, [3:12] so the public would react to him better. [3:14] He was, why are you going to a protest? [3:16] If people love you and care about you, [3:18] and you're a normal, productive citizen, [3:20] you are not going to interfere with ICE protests, okay? [3:23] Especially when they're getting death threats [3:25] up like 5,000%, okay? [3:28] Yes, you went in to stir up trouble, [3:31] you're mentally ill, [3:32] that's why you can't be at your job [3:34] or with your friends anymore. [3:35] Your family doesn't give a shit about you [3:37] or else you wouldn't be at an ICE protest [3:38] because you're not a productive citizen. [3:40] And other than that, when I see it, [3:41] I'm like, it's justified. [3:42] Guess what, if I thought someone was going to harm me [3:43] or my life, I would choose me over them. [3:45] So to clarify, your claim is, [3:47] I have no clue what the legal standard is [3:49] that justifies an LEO to shoot and kill an American, [3:51] but I think Alex Prudy was mentally ill, [3:53] therefore I think it's okay, right? [3:56] No, I'm asking you, that's not what I do. [3:59] What's the legal justification of it? [4:01] Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. [4:01] Go ahead and please educate me and tell me, [4:03] but I think it was justified, yes. [4:05] Well, don't worry, I'm watching the clock. [4:06] I am going to tell you what that legal standard is eventually, [4:09] but before I do, I just am trying to determine [4:11] why you think it's okay a man's life was ended. [4:13] So I asked you why you think it's justified, [4:15] then you went on a three-minute rant [4:16] about how he's mentally ill and was at that protest [4:18] when he shouldn't have been there. [4:19] So to clarify, you think that his death was justified, [4:23] his murder was justified, his execution was justified [4:26] because he was mentally ill, [4:27] he wasn't perfect like the Democrats say, [4:29] CNN photoshopped his face and he was [4:31] at an ICE protest, right? [4:33] I think it was justified because of his actions. [4:37] That is why. [4:38] Those are other things on top of it, [4:40] which led to this point, [4:42] but yes, in my eyes, it is justified. [4:45] Perfect. What actions? [4:47] What actions? [4:48] When you're going out of your way to go to ICE protests, [4:51] harass them from doing their job, [4:53] you're on camera. [4:54] If you, first of all, if you even look like you have a, [4:57] he went with a gun, did he not? [4:59] Did he not have a loaded gun? [5:00] Yes, he did have a gun on his holster, [5:02] but you should know that in accordance [5:03] with the second, fourth, fourth and 14th amendment, [5:05] merely being in possession of a firearm [5:07] does not authorize an LAO to literally shoot and kill you. [5:09] So once again, I'll ask, [5:10] what actions did he engage in that justified the shooting? [5:13] You said he was harassing them. [5:14] How was he harassing them [5:16] that justified them literally killing him? [5:18] Okay, it's on video. [5:19] You've seen the video and I've seen the video. [5:21] That's what happened. [5:22] You're going out of your way at a protest. [5:23] He's been at many other protests. [5:25] All these people are at every protest. [5:27] They're known to harm people. [5:28] They're harassing people, [5:29] probably online talking about killing ICE agents. [5:31] You're gonna go, you're gonna go to a protest [5:33] with a gun. [5:33] And a cop sees it as you're harassing these ICE officers [5:37] that are getting threatened every day. [5:38] Dude, it's not even a Republican thing, a Democrat thing. [5:41] It is a common sense thing. [5:43] It is a common sense thing. [5:44] I would never, yes, CCWs, I understand. [5:46] I would never bring a gun to any Trump rally, anti-Trump. [5:52] That is just not, it's just not a smart thing to do. [5:54] That's why you end up dead. [5:55] Okay, condemn Kyle Rittenhouse. [5:58] Kyle Rittenhouse? [6:00] I don't, what, condemn him? [6:02] Okay, I condemn him. [6:04] I don't know. [6:05] You brought an AR-15 to a protest, remember? [6:07] Yeah, that's insane. [6:08] I think that's insane. [6:10] I'm not, I'm not supporting Kyle Rittenhouse. [6:12] I think that's nuts. [6:13] So you think that the cops would've been justified [6:15] in shooting Kyle dead? [6:17] Maybe, I don't know. [6:18] If the actions were different, maybe. [6:20] I think if you're gonna go with an AR-15 [6:22] and you get shot by a cop, I don't think it's that weird, [6:24] whether you're Kyle Rittenhouse or whatever his name was. [6:26] Why just a maybe? [6:27] I mean, this is your defense for Alex Preddy, [6:29] so why is it it was totally justified if it was Alex Preddy, [6:32] but it's maybe justified if it was Kyle Rittenhouse? [6:34] Basically, what I'd suggest you say, [6:36] in order to stand by your principle is, [6:38] and I quote, Kyle Rittenhouse should've been shot and killed. [6:42] Well, I'm not gonna say he should've. [6:45] I don't know. [6:46] Maybe. [6:47] Maybe he just, maybe he was in a better situation. [6:50] But also, he probably wasn't threatening [6:52] to kill ICE agents and cops. [6:53] He was probably more supportive on their side. [6:55] And also, what, he shot, did he kill people, right? [6:59] Okay, so you also just made another suggestion there, [7:01] that Alex Preddy threatened to shoot and kill a cop. [7:03] That's not true. [7:04] What's your evidence for that? [7:05] No, that's not what I'm saying at all. [7:07] I'm saying I don't know Kyle Rittenhouse's situation. [7:09] It was a big story. [7:09] I don't care. [7:10] It's, I don't know what happened. [7:11] I don't think he's a bad kid. [7:13] I'm glad he's not dead. [7:14] I don't think he should be out shooting people. [7:16] I know it was self-defense. [7:17] If it's self-defense, great. [7:18] That guy, what, was it self, is he defending himself [7:21] from the situation he put him in? [7:23] Like, here's the thing. [7:24] At the end of the day, that situation he's in [7:26] is 100% avoidable. [7:29] You can go into all the aspects of it. [7:31] I don't care that that happened to him. [7:33] I think it was very stupid to be there. [7:35] There's a reason it doesn't happen to me, [7:36] because I wouldn't put myself in that situation. [7:38] And neither would you. [7:39] I wouldn't either. [7:40] It's a very stupid situation to be in. [7:42] It's not that, it's really not that complicated. [7:45] Avoid dumb situations. [7:46] Wait, Emily, this doesn't make any sense, [7:48] because earlier you said the world is literally better [7:50] without Alex Preddy because he brought a gun to a protest. [7:54] Now you're saying that you don't think [7:56] that Kyle Rittenhouse is a quote-unquote bad kid, [7:58] regardless of the fact that he brought a gun to a protest. [8:01] So what it seems like is that bringing a gun to a protest [8:04] is not the relevant factor here that leads you [8:06] to the conclusion that Alex Preddy was terrible [8:08] and we're better off without him [8:09] and Kyle Rittenhouse is not a bad kid, [8:11] but rather political affiliation. [8:13] And this is another point why I think [8:15] that Donald Trump's mass deportation is so anti-American, [8:17] because it's led Americans like you to think [8:19] that the murder of your American brothers and sisters [8:22] roaming free in the streets of this country [8:23] is somehow justified simply because they disagree with you. [8:26] And going back to ICE, why is it that you tell us [8:30] you think every quote-unquote illegal should be deported [8:32] because they broke a law and committed a federal misdemeanor, [8:35] completely victimless, by the way, [8:36] but then when an ICE agent literally murders somebody, [8:39] you don't care and you disregard it, [8:41] then you come up with some quasi-justification for it [8:44] when you self-admittedly do not know the legal standard [8:46] that would make that shooting justified. [8:48] Even going back to that legal standard, [8:50] which I'll share with you now, [8:52] you cannot kill somebody for merely being in possession [8:54] of a firearm as an LEO because, as I previously suggested, [8:58] the Second, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment, [9:00] as well as previous SCOTUS case law like Conner v. Graham, [9:04] which ruled that there has to be an objective reasonableness [9:09] to an imminent murder. [9:09] An imminent threat upon the life of anybody [9:11] within the immediate vicinity of somebody [9:13] that LEOs are going to shoot and kill [9:14] and merely being in possession of a firearm isn't one. [9:17] Even the NRA says this. [9:19] Two days after Alex Preddy got murdered, [9:22] a U.S. attorney from California posted on Twitter that [9:25] this is totally justified because, well, [9:27] Alex Preddy brought a gun. [9:29] The NRA responded by saying that that rhetoric [9:31] is dangerous and wrong. [9:33] So in other words, the NRA, [9:35] who you likely have a membership for, [9:37] says that your rhetoric is dangerous [9:39] and wrong when you suggest that he could be shot [9:42] and killed for merely being in possession of a firearm. [9:45] I don't have a membership to the NRA. [9:47] Thank you, though. [9:48] No, I think situation and context matters, [9:51] and that's the whole point of this. [9:53] It's not a left versus right thing. [9:54] It's if you are someone who is no longer working at your job, [9:58] your family's worried about you, [9:59] you're clearly brainwashed by the media, [10:01] you're mentally ill, you're violent, [10:03] you're going out there and harassing ICE agents, [10:07] and you're getting these situations to be, [10:10] much worse than they already are, [10:12] and you also have a gun with you, [10:13] and you are at the point where you are, [10:14] like, physically wrestling with ICE agents, [10:17] and you get shot. [10:18] That is 100% an avoidable situation. [10:20] You put yourself there, and I guess, yeah, [10:22] some people will be like, it's sad, [10:23] it shouldn't have happened. [10:24] Okay, well, it did, [10:25] so there's nothing we can do about it. [10:26] But, yeah, I think it's justified. [10:27] I'm sorry. [10:28] I mean, the first 90% of what you said [10:30] was baseless conjecture and reasonless rambling, okay? [10:34] You just threw buzzwords out there. [10:35] Mentally ill, his family didn't like him, quit his job. [10:38] None of those things amount to an imminent threat. [10:39] None of those things amount to an imminent threat. [10:39] None of those things amount to an imminent threat [10:40] upon the life of an LEO [10:41] to justify them to shoot and kill you. [10:43] Now, the reason why I only said 90% instead of 100% [10:45] was the last thing that you said [10:46] is he was wrestling with cops. [10:48] Well, when I watched the video, [10:49] what I saw was him positioning himself [10:51] in between an officer and a woman. [10:53] When that officer begun to push that woman, he caught her, [10:56] and then the officer maced him, put him to the ground. [10:59] Next thing, he was being pistol-whipped in the head by one [11:01] while being dogpiled by seven. [11:02] But at no point did I see a singular action [11:04] in which would amount to justification [11:06] for an officer-involved shooting, [11:07] because even if he was obstructing, [11:09] mere obstruction does not tell an LEO they could kill you. [11:12] And even if he was resisting, mere resisting, [11:14] or even resisting while being in possession [11:16] of a loaded firearm, also doesn't amount [11:18] to justification for an LEO to kill you. [11:21] But I'd say from my perspective [11:22] that he didn't do either of those two things. [11:23] And the reason why we saw him wrestle to the ground [11:25] wasn't because of his own doing, [11:26] but rather because of the lawless actions [11:29] of these masked ice thugs. [11:32] Thugs. [11:33] The people literally here to protect us [11:35] from illegal aliens raping and killing children [11:37] are the thugs. [11:38] Same people are like, oh, ice agents are white supremacists. [11:40] No. [11:40] They're Nazis. [11:41] And then they're like gay Mexicans, literally [11:43] asking liberals if they can please go do their job, [11:45] because there is a child rapist. [11:47] Those things are not irrelevant. [11:49] They do matter. [11:49] If you are at the point where politics has made you [11:53] so mentally ill that you are clearly [11:55] a danger to yourself and others, probably like him [11:58] and the other woman as her whatever lesbian wife [12:00] is telling her to go run over ice agents, [12:03] instead of being at home taking care of their children, [12:05] then yeah, that actually does matter. [12:07] Mental health matters in these situations, [12:09] because a mentally healthy person [12:10] would not be in that situation. [12:13] They would know the danger. [12:14] They would know that's not a smart thing to do. [12:16] They probably would be at home with their family [12:18] or at their job. [12:19] And I'm like, those things do matter. [12:21] A normal person does not put themselves in that situation. [12:23] They need not just run up to them and shoot them. [12:25] Obviously, we've both seen the videos. [12:27] We clearly have different takes on the videos [12:29] and takeaways from it. [12:30] But in general, I'm like, that's what happens [12:33] when you put yourself in very stupid, avoidable situations. [12:36] And it's very sad, happens all the time. [12:38] If anybody's mentally ill because of politics here, [12:40] it's you. [12:41] You're telling us that a man who lost his life [12:43] was not a victim of murder, the officer was justified, [12:46] and we're better off without him, [12:47] not on the basis of any legitimate claim [12:50] in conjunction to the legality of the situation. [12:53] You admitted to not knowing what justifies an LAO [12:55] to shoot and kill somebody, [12:56] but because of baseless conjecture. [12:58] Like, Emily, we're doing it again. [13:00] You're just sitting here telling me, [13:01] oh, he could have avoided the situation. [13:03] Oh, liberal. [13:04] Oh, ICE protests. [13:05] Oh, they're, like, none of that matters. [13:07] Like, you have to be able to demonstrate [13:09] and objectively reason with that. [13:10] It's a reasonable threat that Alex Preddy was engaging in [13:12] to make those officers legitimately fear [13:14] that if they didn't shoot him, [13:15] he would have killed them first, okay? [13:18] Saying that he could have avoided the situation [13:19] by staying home, it does not amount [13:22] to an objectively reasonable threat [13:23] upon the lives of the LAOs. [13:25] That's just more victim-blaming rhetoric, [13:26] like the other rhetoric we hear [13:28] from a lot of people on the right, [13:29] like telling a woman maybe she shouldn't have gone [13:31] to that bar because at that bar, [13:32] she was date-raped by a man. [13:34] Once again, going back to that whole mentally ill [13:36] because of politics thing, [13:38] quite ironic that you're the one making that point. [13:40] If it was a Republican in the same position, [13:43] I would have said the same thing. [13:44] Like, the same thing at January 6th, [13:46] no one gave a that Ashley Babbitt got shot. [13:48] They were probably happy she got shot [13:49] the way liberals love to celebrate [13:51] the deaths of all Republicans. [13:53] It was the same exact thing. [13:54] No one gave a when they shot her. [13:56] An unarmed woman, but Democrats were per, [13:59] she shouldn't have been there. [14:00] She was breaking the law. [14:02] And that's what you're telling me, [14:03] I'm mentally ill because I don't give a [14:05] because he was a loser. [14:07] And his life didn't really have much meaning, [14:09] and it sure as doesn't matter to me. [14:10] And I'm sorry, that's not the cute, [14:13] like politically correct take, [14:15] but that is a common sense take, okay? [14:18] Sorry, he's not a productive citizen. [14:20] He's not curing cancer. [14:20] He's not gonna be the next Elon Musk. [14:22] I don't care. [14:23] I don't have to care about people I don't know. [14:25] But this whole thing of like, [14:25] oh, you're making it political. [14:27] No, if my Republican friend was in that situation [14:30] and brought a gun and was wrestling agents and got shot, [14:32] I'd be like, you are a idiot. [14:34] You have a little time left, [14:35] so I just gotta ask you a quick question. [14:37] So just to clarify, [14:37] you think that a nurse at a veteran's hospital [14:39] who helped save the lives of those [14:40] that were willing to lose their lives for us in war, [14:42] protecting our constitution, [14:43] our neoliberal, natural born rights, [14:45] is a loser doing nothing productive for society, right? [14:49] Yeah, just because you're a nurse [14:51] does not mean you are a productive member of society, [14:54] because that would mean that I trust the, okay. [14:57] Yeah, I couldn't have said it better myself. [14:58] I think that you just took the mask off, [15:00] and unfortunately, I can't tell you why, [15:02] because the red light just went off. [15:03] This is like rage bait. [15:05] I kind of forgot how crazy your beliefs are, Emily. [15:08] They're literally, it's just why everyone [15:09] who has common sense thinks [15:10] but they don't have the balls [15:11] to say out loud, [15:13] because you have to do the politically correct bullshit [15:15] of acting like we care. [15:16] My first face-off claim is Democrats [15:18] are the biggest threat to children in this country. [15:21] So clearly, the first thing I'm gonna do [15:23] is I'm gonna ask you for your argument [15:24] insofar as why you think Democrats [15:26] are the biggest threat to children in this country, [15:28] but I want you to keep in mind the hurdles [15:29] that you have to overcome, [15:30] most predominantly the fact that the GOP, [15:33] not the Democrats, [15:34] are championing an adjudicated rapist as president, [15:37] somebody who's also boasted about the sexual exploitation [15:40] of women and girls by barging [15:42] into their dressing rooms [15:43] and looking at their naked bodies [15:44] on top of the coverup we see downstream [15:47] of Donald Trump's administration [15:48] and the federal government [15:49] of the co-conspirators, predators, [15:51] and child rapists inside of the Epstein files. [15:54] So once again, why do you think Democrats [15:57] are the biggest threat to children in this country? [15:59] Okay, first of all, [16:01] the whole rapist claim is so insane to me. [16:03] How many people have been sued for calling him a rapist? [16:06] That's not true. [16:07] He's not a rapist or else he would have been charged, [16:10] and I assume he would have been in jail for that. [16:12] So throwing that out is not a good way to go about it. [16:15] You know better than that. [16:18] I'm sure you understand laws a lot better than I do. [16:21] That's not my strong field. [16:22] Not a convicted rapist, okay? [16:24] I would not support him if he was a convicted rapist, [16:28] nor would other Republicans. [16:29] The comments of Locker Room Boy Talk, I don't care. [16:33] I don't care what people are saying behind closed doors. [16:36] I think that's a very normal way to speak for a man. [16:39] Okay, so my issues would be the border, okay? [16:41] When we're talking about the border, okay? [16:42] When we're talking about protecting children. [16:44] A wide open border is not how I would protect children whatsoever, okay? [16:48] 450,000 missing children under the Biden's open borders. [16:51] That's a lot. [16:52] We can agree that's a lot. [16:53] That's unbelievable numbers. [16:54] Trump so far, his administration has located 145,000 of those missing children. [16:59] Why were those children missing? [17:00] How did they go missing? [17:01] Why was no one looking for them? [17:03] I think that's a big deal. [17:03] I don't like blaming necessarily administrations. [17:06] I'm just glad the kids are back. [17:08] I'm sure we can agree with that, right? [17:09] We're continuing to look for them. [17:10] So obviously with the open border, you have child protection, [17:12] you have child trafficking, you have organ harvesting, okay? [17:15] That's what's happening at these borders. [17:16] Kids are going with addresses on their wrists and they're going to be pretty much sold and [17:22] raped for the rest of their lives until they inevitably probably kill themselves from being [17:25] that traumatized. [17:26] So I would say closing the border, which Trump has done pretty well, [17:31] is the number one way to protect kids, okay? [17:34] We have to keep those bad people out, we have to keep the kids in, we have to find the kids. [17:37] And that is the hub of child trafficking. [17:39] It's hard for Democrats to debate this and like, well, [17:41] you have abortion. [17:42] Which is killing a lot of kids every year, not exactly as strong, Republicans are not [17:47] really the pro-abortion party. [17:49] You have transgenderism, which is ruining children and they're also dying from it and [17:53] killing themselves at record numbers. [17:56] Democrats are not defending children, 2025, the House passed the Preventing Violence Act, [18:00] Women by Illegal Aliens Act. [18:02] So this is pretty much just crimes against children, sex offense, blah, blah, blah. [18:06] Every single no came from Democrats. [18:08] I just don't understand. [18:09] I want to understand, why would you vote no for that? [18:11] It's protecting children. [18:12] It's just-. [18:12] This shouldn't even be a left versus right thing, which drives me nuts. [18:16] The reason Democrats voted no against that bill is because there's already pre-existing [18:19] law on the book to allow our government to deport somebody on the basis of an accusation [18:24] or more so a conviction of a violent sex crime. [18:27] So clearly the reason why Democrats voted no is not to give flowers to Nancy Mace that [18:31] she doesn't deserve, alongside the fact that it's incredibly hypocritical for, as I started [18:36] this debate with suggesting, to say that you care about violent sex crimes when you made [18:41] a violent sex criminal president. [18:42] Okay. [18:43] I mean, what would your opinion be on the Lake and Riley Act, which was obviously very [18:47] talked about? [18:48] If I was president, I'd veto it. [18:50] I think that it's terrible for women and girls abroad because it allows for the deportation [18:53] of an undocumented immigrant on the basis of an accusation of a violent crime, which [18:58] then means they'll be deported with no guilty verdict to another country where they will [19:03] be able to roam free and recommit. [19:05] At the bare minimum, we should be finding them guilty first, so they'll either land [19:08] in a jail cell in another country or get thrown in prison here. [19:12] Okay. [19:13] That's good. [19:14] Yeah. [19:15] But I'm like, okay, so then are you going through a trial first and keeping them in [19:18] the country until we know that they're guilty, or are we just allowing them to go and then [19:22] we're assuming they're guilty? [19:23] How does that work? [19:24] Because I know Democrats are very like, got to go by the book. [19:27] No one's above the law. [19:28] So I guess how would that work? [19:30] What would you prefer? [19:31] What is wrong with it that would make the bill better, I guess? [19:33] I mean, I just told you what's wrong with the Lake and Riley Act is that it deports [19:37] people on the basis of an accusation or allows for the deportation of somebody on the basis [19:40] of an accusation of a violent sex crime. [19:42] Then they roam free in another country. [19:43] Yeah. [19:44] Where they could recommit. [19:45] That's the problem. [19:46] What we should be doing is we should be keeping them in jail here, in custody here, finding [19:51] them guilty here, and then deporting them to a jail cell abroad, or like I already said, [19:55] putting them in a jail cell here. [19:57] Okay. [19:58] So obviously you would support them going back to where they came from and serving their [20:02] jail time where they came from, not here in America. [20:07] The only thing that I care about is a reliable criminal justice system where I know they [20:10] won't be able to roam free on the streets of any country in the face of planet earth. [20:14] If their home country has one of those, send them back and put them in a jail cell there. [20:19] What if the home country doesn't have that? [20:21] Do we keep them here? [20:23] Yes. [20:24] So we keep them here even though they're violent? [20:26] We keep them in jail? [20:27] We keep them away from children? [20:28] Or do we just let them roam free? [20:31] We would probably put somebody found guilty of a violent sex crime in jail. [20:35] Well, we tend not to. [20:37] That's my issue. [20:38] We have, you know, I cover it on my show, what, four times a week? [20:42] There's usually a black male with a rap sheet of 45 pages. [20:46] That's committed. [20:47] You know, he's attacked women, he's assaulted women, he's attempted to rape women, potentially [20:51] child porn in the past. [20:52] And then we see he goes and like lights a woman on fire because these DAs that are always [20:57] Democrats under people like George Soros tend to just let them go over and over and over. [21:03] And I'm like, would you agree we need to keep them in prison? [21:06] I don't think you should have 45 strikes. [21:09] I just don't think that works. [21:10] That quote unquote black male that's been found guilty of rape that's roaming free in [21:14] the streets is actually a billionaire white man named Donald Trump. [21:17] He's serving as our president. [21:18] Two years ago, a civil court held him liable for the rape of E. Jean Carroll and you still [21:22] voted for him. [21:23] You're a hypocrite. [21:24] Okay. [21:25] The E. Jean Carroll. [21:26] Okay. [21:27] So he's guilty. [21:28] So he's a rapist. [21:30] Why is he not in jail? [21:31] Because I'll help you with knowledge here about the criminal justice system inside of [21:34] America. [21:35] Civil courts determine financial responsibility, not criminal responsibility. [21:39] So when he was found guilty, he wasn't put in a jail cell. [21:41] He was only forced to pay $87 million. [21:44] And before you ask the reason why he couldn't or wasn't found guilty. [21:48] Inside of a criminal court of law is because of the statute of limitations on the crime [21:51] that expired, meaning even if E. Jean Carroll had a video of it happening to her, she was [21:55] not able to pursue criminal charges. [21:57] Therefore a claim of liability in a civil court of law was the best option she had, [22:02] she had available $87 million for saying something happened to you with relatively no proof as [22:09] one of the most attacked men on the planet. [22:12] I mean, that is probably, I would say I'm, I'm sure you're, you know, protect women care [22:17] about women. [22:18] I would say she's the epitome of what makes these cases complete jokes and why people [22:23] don't believe women about a lot of things they say, including rape, sexual assault. [22:29] She's a crazy woman who lives in the first of all, $87 million is unbelievable. [22:36] That's actually unbelievable for something that you literally can't prove. [22:40] And I'm just like, so it happened that long ago. [22:42] You happen to be a crazy liberal feminist. [22:44] You live in the woods, you do all this crazy art, whatever bullshit she's doing. [22:47] And all of a sudden when someone's president has power and every three letter agency and [22:52] all these people attempted assassinations, all of a sudden now you're traumatized from [22:57] something that happened that long ago, Trump was born into money, successful, has been [23:01] around beautiful women his whole life. [23:03] Why there's no world where I believe he would even touch that woman, nevertheless, rape [23:08] her. [23:09] Well, I mean, there's a lot that you said there. [23:10] So first and foremost, you said, wow, she was able to sue him and find him guilty of [23:15] rape with no proof. [23:16] I don't believe that. [23:17] There's been research into the case. [23:19] What is one piece of evidence that the jury used to hold Donald Trump liable for raping [23:22] her? [23:23] Okay. [23:24] So she's in the fitting room at the store. [23:26] She claims that all this has happened. [23:27] It's like, that's just not even realistic. [23:30] None of this, none of this has happened. [23:32] How come she didn't come by 30, 20 plus years ago? [23:35] Are there tapes of this? [23:36] Are there evidence? [23:37] You also have everyone around who, who, who, who's willing to lie for her. [23:41] You have a justice system who completely wants to put this guy in jail because they can't [23:45] attempt to assassinate him. [23:47] There's not. [23:48] Women who are actually raped by predators on the street who have real results can go [23:53] and get a rape kit. [23:54] They don't get $87 million. [23:57] Like it's just one of those things, regardless if it was Biden or Trump, you look at it. [24:01] Of course she's a liar. [24:02] There's no reason she deserved a dollar for that. [24:05] There is not substantial proof. [24:06] She did. [24:07] Does she have a rape kit? [24:08] Is there semen in her? [24:09] Is there any of this? [24:10] No, she just sued Donald Trump and he had to pay her. [24:13] He had to pay her money and it's like no one's getting raped and getting $87 million. [24:17] It's fine. [24:18] It's crazy. [24:19] When you step back and you take Trump out of it, if it was anyone else, you'd be like, [24:23] that's nuts. [24:24] But because it's Trump, no one can just look through it with like logical glasses on it. [24:29] It's just like, oh yeah, he's yep. [24:30] He's a rapist. [24:31] Yeah. [24:32] You just wasted a minute of your time because I asked you what's one piece of evidence that [24:36] the jury used to find him guilty and you sure talked a lot, but you didn't name a piece [24:39] of evidence. [24:40] So I'll help you. [24:41] Uh, there was a lot of evidence that the jury used in order to hold Donald Trump guilty [24:44] for the rape of a Eugene Carroll. [24:46] Most predominantly. [24:47] You had her own testimony alongside the testimony of seven of her friends. [24:51] You had therapist notes from the nineties indicating that she was raped by Donald Trump. [24:54] You would address it. [24:55] She submitted to the court claiming it had Trump's DNA in it from the day that he raped [24:58] her and in response, they tested it, found male DNA, asked Trump for his DNA and he said, [25:03] no, no, no, no, no until the discovery period was over. [25:07] That's something a guilty man would do. [25:08] Then on top of that, you had the inconsistencies and lies within his own, uh, within his own [25:13] testimony to start with those. [25:15] He first claimed that he never met Eugene Carroll. [25:17] He responded to the court by submitting a picture of the two together. [25:21] That's a lie. [25:22] He also claimed that he never do that to her because she isn't his type, but then under [25:25] deposition actually confused a picture of his ex wife, Marla Maples to be Eugene Carroll. [25:30] So how crazy does she sound now? [25:32] Honestly, that just kind of sounds like victim blaming. [25:34] And on top of that, I'd say the silver bullet is his character priors, 2005 access Hollywood [25:40] tapes. [25:41] What did he say? [25:42] He said that he could just grab any woman by their female member. [25:44] He doesn't even need to ask first. [25:45] That's exactly what the jury found him guilty of. [25:47] The jury found him guilty for doing grabbing Eugene Carroll by her female member without [25:51] asking first, then inserting his fingers inside. [25:54] And what about another civil bullet here in 2005, he also sat down with Howard Stern and [25:59] straight up told Howard Stern that he had sexually exploited naked women and naked girls [26:04] by barging into their dressing rooms at Miss teen USA and Miss USA and then would look [26:08] at their naked bodies. [26:09] That's something a rapist would do. [26:11] So I don't understand why you are toeing the line, doing everything you can to defend that [26:16] rapist. [26:17] I'm not defending him. [26:19] I don't, I don't believe the evidence. [26:21] I think it's completely insane. [26:23] I don't believe her. [26:24] She's out of her mind. [26:25] I don't believe anyone who is trying to take down the president on that level would be [26:30] honest with something that happened that long ago. [26:32] I have a little bit to time here. [26:33] Your time is up. [26:34] You can't speak. [26:35] Uh, in your last breath, you straight up told me that you don't believe her. [26:39] You don't believe the evidence after not responding to any of the pieces of evidence that I told [26:43] you. [26:44] It seems like you were brainwashed into this worldview where you were willing to acknowledge, [26:45] uh, that she was a woman. [26:46] Ignore reality, believe the lies and discount the testimony of a survivor. [26:51] And that makes sense because that's what the totality of the GOP is doing right now with [26:55] the survivors from the Epstein files. [26:56] Pam Bondi wouldn't even look at them. [26:58] I'm going to use the rest of my time to play you the clip of Donald Trump admitting to [27:02] sexual exploitation. [27:03] And I expect at no point in the future of this debate, will you acknowledge it, address [27:07] it or talk about it at all? [27:08] Because just like with the E. Jean Carroll and the fact that she was raped, you're going [27:11] to sweep it under the rug too. [27:12] She wasn't, well, is there fingers in her or she's raped? [27:14] Those are, uh, you can't talk. [27:16] That's my time to talk. [27:17] Well, I feel like that's a good clarification. [27:18] If you're going to call someone a rapist, you, you, I mean, you interrupted me there. [27:21] You said, was it fingers in her or was she raped? [27:23] That is rape. [27:24] I would, I would say that the definition of rape would include the penetration of a woman's [27:27] female member with any part of a man's body, but most definitely his fingers. [27:31] Here's a clip of Donald Trump admitting to sexual exploitation is the owner of the pageant. [27:35] It's your obligation to do that. [27:37] So you have done that. [27:38] I'll tell you the funniest is that I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting [27:43] dressed and ready and everything else. [27:44] And you know, no men are anywhere. [27:46] And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting [27:50] it. [27:51] You know, I'm inspecting. [27:52] I want to make sure they're like the doctors. [27:53] Is everyone okay? [27:54] You know, they're standing there with no clothes. [27:56] Is everybody okay? [27:57] And you see these incredible looking women. [28:00] And so I sort of get away with things like that. [28:02] So I just want to get it clear. [28:03] You're telling me that this man and you're laughing, this man that admitted to abusing [28:07] his position of power as the owner of these beauty pageants to barge into the women and [28:11] girls dressing room where you then abuse their position of vulnerability because they feel [28:15] vulnerable enough to do that. [28:16] To take their clothes off the change, to then look at them naked is acceptable and you in [28:20] fact even find it funny just like he did. [28:23] You could be right about everything in the world, but it doesn't even f***ing matter. [28:25] Never even going to move a f***ing needle. [28:28] Literally everyone's going to watch this and agree with you and me and just go on with [28:31] their life. [28:32] Like you're never going to make a difference. [28:33] You'd be surprised the stories that I've heard about the difference that I made. [28:36] Like what? [28:37] What did you say? [28:38] Someone's life? [28:39] Yeah, actually. [28:40] You're so gay. [28:41] You're not saving anyone's life, bro. [28:42] You're so f***ing narcissistic. [28:44] It's a real story. [28:45] Let's face off claim is Donald Trump wishes he could be a dictator. [28:48] Okay. [28:51] I mean, he has a lot of power right now, leader of the free world. [28:53] So why is he not doing it? [28:56] Why when people are going and attempting to assassinate him, rioting on the streets, why [29:00] is he not banning people? [29:03] Kicking them out of the country? [29:04] I don't know. [29:05] Why isn't he more of a dictator? [29:07] I feel like he has the power. [29:08] He should. [29:09] Well, it's funny that you make that point because I'd actually argue that he has tried [29:12] to position himself above the law, above the constitution, above Congress. [29:17] Even, and I, and I think that there is a great argument that I could give you to demonstrate [29:20] how that's the case. [29:21] So in the last year and couple months, that's how long he's been president. [29:24] I believe that he's infringed upon article one of the constitution, article two of the [29:28] constitution, then amendment one, two, five, sorry, four, uh, 10, 14 and 22. [29:35] And we could go through that now because if that's all true, then I think you'll kind [29:38] of see some credibility in my claim about how he wants to position himself as a dictator [29:41] above laws, above the constitution, above Congress, yada, yada, yada. [29:44] So let's start with the amendments that he's infringed on. [29:47] I think that he served as a threat to the first amendment when he suggested that it's [29:50] now illegal to criticize him in the media. [29:52] I think that he suggested a threat to the second amendment when he told his department [29:54] of justice to try to find any way to ban any and all gun ownership for a law abiding trans [29:58] American citizens. [29:59] The NRA agreed with me by the way. [30:01] I think that he's infringed on the fourth amendment when he gave an order to ICE to [30:05] arrest people without any judicial warrants. [30:07] That is blatantly illegal. [30:09] Courts have ordered and ruled as such. [30:11] Same thing with his illegal deportation of like 300 Venezuelan immigrants to Seca in [30:14] El Salvador with no due process. [30:16] Judge ruled that was illegal. [30:17] Donald Trump said, I don't care. [30:19] I think that he's infringed on the 10th amendment via illegally deploying the National Guard [30:22] in Illinois. [30:23] SCOTUS actually gave their opinion on the subject matter. [30:25] They said it was unconstitutional. [30:26] He's definitely infringed on the 14th amendment. [30:29] He did that day one with executive order number 14160 where he tried to take birthright citizenship [30:34] away from the children born to undocumented immigrants on American soil. [30:37] They've had that since 1868 with the ratification of the 14th. [30:40] He can't do that. [30:41] Same thing with the 22nd amendment. [30:42] He's just kind of served a threat to that via the re-suggestion that he wants to run [30:45] for a third term. [30:46] Then we look at article one of the constitution. [30:49] He's infringed on article one and two. [30:51] He's infringed on the articles of the constitution via the suggestion that if Congress doesn't [30:54] pass voter ID laws, he'll just do it on its own. [30:56] He can't assume the power of Congress. [30:57] That's illegal. [30:58] Then same thing with like nationalizing the midterm elections. [31:01] That's also illegal. [31:02] The constitution gives that ability to the states. [31:05] This is just kind of scratching the surface, but clearly I don't want to overwhelm you [31:07] with too much information. [31:08] I know that you don't really know too much about the law or the constitution, so let's [31:11] start there. [31:14] Okay. [31:15] Jesus. [31:16] Go back to the first one. [31:19] Okay. [31:20] So you just want me to pick something? [31:22] Okay. [31:23] I'll, I'll just, I'll just do just first three. [31:24] Just go. [31:25] So I can like remember what you're even saying. [31:26] Yeah, for sure. [31:27] I'll just pick an example because that was a lot, a really good example of him infringing [31:30] on the constitution, positioning himself above it, uh, and kind of telling me that he wants [31:34] to be an authoritarian would be his infringement on the 14th amendment where he tried to take [31:37] birthright citizenship away from the children born to undocumented immigrants on American [31:41] soil, even though the 14th amendment gives them that right. [31:44] Okay. [31:45] And I just don't agree with that. [31:46] I don't agree. [31:47] First of all, them getting citizenship, I don't think that it should be like that. [31:50] I see there's way too much going on. [31:53] You have illegals coming here, they're having kids and then they're getting citizenship. [31:56] We have overwhelming amount of like, uh, Jesus, you can call them baby making houses, uh, [32:03] in orange County where it's literally just trying a bunch of Chinese women in a house [32:06] and they're just pregnant and they're giving citizenship to their kids. [32:10] So I don't know. [32:11] I don't personally, I don't think that should be legal. [32:14] I don't think we should be giving that to them. [32:15] Of course, Democrats are not going to agree with that. [32:18] I just think it's interesting though. [32:20] Because first of all, I know when he's talking about the third term, he's joking and I know [32:25] it's like, you're like, he's president, he can't joke like that. [32:27] That's fine. [32:28] Now I'm going to get into that. [32:29] Um, I would say, what about the Biden administration, you know, pressuring like Mark Zuckerberg [32:34] and Facebook and all this stuff to either like suppress information, you know, taking [32:38] Trump down from Twitter and all these things. [32:40] Like would you say that that was too far or do you think that's justified? [32:44] So I don't mind talking about the Biden Harris administration with you and uh, having a conversation [32:49] about potential executive overreach there. [32:50] I just want to ensure productive linear conversation, which would include going point by point. [32:55] But I hope, I hope that we have enough time to go over that because I'd love to before [32:58] the clock ends. [32:59] Now, to respond to your first comments about the 14th amendment, I don't expect you to [33:02] think that the children born to undocumented immigrants should be birthright citizens. [33:06] Okay. [33:07] Emily, you're crazy radical conservative. [33:10] Look back at the debate that we've had. [33:11] It would be a, a, a needle in a haystack and such a surprise for you to tell me otherwise [33:17] that you do think they should have birthright citizenship. [33:20] I mean, I hear this from every conservative ever want to make this point about him infringing [33:24] on the 14th amendment. [33:25] The first response is always, well, I don't think the children born to them should have [33:28] birthright citizenship, but that's not what matters here. [33:32] What matters here is regardless of what you think, Donald Trump positioned himself above [33:36] the constitution, regardless of what you think about the 14th amendment, Donald Trump attempted [33:41] to terminate it as it stands with an executive order, regardless of what you think that is [33:47] dictatorial. [33:48] That is authoritarian. [33:49] Okay. [33:50] The laws matters, uh, matter. [33:52] The constitution matters. [33:54] Congress matters. [33:55] The Supreme court matters. [33:56] No man, no one person should have the ability to completely change the laws as they've existed [34:01] since 1868 with one signature on one piece of paper and that's what I want you to respond [34:07] to. [34:08] No, that's fair. [34:09] If you want to go, I'm giving an opinion. [34:11] I don't think they should have citizenship and I think that he should go about it legally. [34:14] If he doesn't like it, I think he should legally go about it and you know, uh, attempt to put [34:19] forth in front of the American people. [34:20] I don't think he wants to change it, but I don't think he should just go and do whatever [34:23] he wants because when the last, I, every administration does usually whatever they want. [34:27] They do a lot of things that I think are overreach and illegal and they should all be held to [34:31] the same standard. [34:32] It's not, I'm sure Trump overreaches, Biden overreach, Obama, they've all overreached. [34:38] So it's just like, I, I agree. [34:39] He should go about it the legal way. [34:40] I think we should have some order in the country for once. [34:42] Okay. [34:43] So it actually seems like you might agree with my claim that he wants to be a dictator [34:46] now. [34:47] No. [34:48] Well, I mean, what else could he do? [34:49] There's no document. [34:51] If you agree with the constitution, what else could he do to prove to you that he wants [34:54] to be a dictator? [34:55] Be a dictator. [34:56] If you agree that he doesn't care about the constitution, if you agree he doesn't care [34:59] about the checks and balances, if you agree he doesn't care about the Supreme Court of [35:02] Congress, like, like, like what else could he possibly do to convince you that he wants [35:07] to be a dictator? [35:08] By being a dictator. [35:10] Look at people you consider dictators around the world. [35:14] Why doesn't he just behave like that then? [35:16] Why doesn't he just throw out the book and be like, all right, all these people protesting, [35:20] throw them in jail. [35:21] Freedom of speech? [35:22] Gone. [35:23] Not allowed to criticize me. [35:24] Shut down every other station. [35:25] That's not, I don't know, Fox and Newsmax. [35:27] Maybe he likes them. [35:28] Right? [35:29] Put political opponents in jail. [35:30] Go, you know, I mean the assassination attempts on his life or, you know, it's like, look [35:33] who's just, you know, testifying in front of Epstein felt like, why doesn't he just [35:37] go be a dictator? [35:38] If that's, if he's capable of that, I mean, the thing is the United States is like, you [35:42] are the leader of the free world. [35:43] You have a lot of power. [35:44] You have a lot of power over other countries as well. [35:47] So it's like, so just go. [35:48] So why isn't he doing it then? [35:50] Because I feel like with the, I mean, amount of like attempts to ruin his life, his career, [35:55] going after his family, his safety, you know, assassination attempts, I feel like he's handled [36:00] it pretty well. [36:02] He doesn't seem too bitter or upset about it. [36:04] So I'm like, why doesn't he just go do it? [36:06] Like who would you like him to be more like and who do you consider a real dictator and [36:09] is he like them? [36:10] Okay. [36:11] Yeah. [36:12] Let me respond to everything that you said. [36:13] So I think that you made a really good point and you don't even know it. [36:15] You said he's capable of it. [36:16] I don't think that he is fully capable of it. [36:18] And in fact, I think that's why he's not. [36:20] He's not a full blown dictator mask off authoritarian because we do have checks and balances. [36:25] We do have a body of people that sit on the Capitol building all day that could strike [36:29] him down and talk to members of his administration. [36:32] We do have judges that rule a lot of the things that he does as illegal. [36:35] And sometimes those orders will stick. [36:37] The administration will get checked. [36:39] You and I just never hear about it because of Steve's, Steve Bannon's tactic of flooding [36:42] the zone and doing something new whenever they lose. [36:45] But my point is, is even though we have these checks and balances, even though we have [36:50] Congress, even though we have the courts, okay, he is still pushing the limits to a [36:54] level never seen before in this country's history. [36:56] All right. [36:57] Starting in 2020 with this fake elector scheme of installing fake votes for himself in Congress [37:01] to rig and steal the election. [37:03] Only reason why that didn't work is because of Mike Pence. [37:05] He wouldn't have been a dictator. [37:07] Oh, he loves the people too on that day, by the way, pardon the 174 people that try to [37:11] kill cops. [37:12] Moving on to all the constitutional infringements that he's made in the last year that I told [37:15] you, definitely indicative of authoritarianism. [37:18] Saying that he wants to. [37:19] I don't know. [37:20] Rationalize the midterm elections that doesn't ring a bell for you. [37:23] Like maybe a little bit authoritarian and every day he does something new to demonstrate [37:26] to you, me and the rest of the world that that is what he wants and he would like a [37:30] dictatorship and he wouldn't like any checks and balances because if he were to respect [37:34] the checks and balances, then why do I have so much ammunition? [37:37] So many talking points and so many facts that I'm sharing with you right now to demonstrate [37:41] otherwise. [37:42] If he likes the constitution, why the hell did he call for its termination? [37:45] If he likes elections, why the hell did he try to prevent one in 2020? [37:49] If he likes Congress? [37:50] Why did he say that he could federalize elections and take that power away from states and pass [37:54] laws without them? [37:55] If he likes courts, then why the hell did he try to ignore the court's order that ruled [37:59] some of his deportations as illegal? [38:01] And if he likes the Supreme Court and their rulings on the constitution, then why the [38:05] hell doesn't he respect their previous rulings on the nature of the 14th amendment when he [38:09] attempted to argue that it didn't apply to the children born to undocumented immigrants? [38:12] The obvious answer to all these questions is, well, clearly he doesn't like the checks [38:15] and balances and if he doesn't like the checks and balances, then my claim that he wants [38:19] to be a dictator. [38:20] That's true. [38:21] He doesn't have much time left, correct? [38:23] So why doesn't he just go do all these things? [38:26] That's what I don't understand. [38:27] If he wants to do it, he has the, this is the only time left. [38:30] He has power to do all these things. [38:32] And as a Republican who voted for him, I think he's been really weak across the board with [38:36] a lot of these things. [38:37] We voted to close the border, mass deportations. [38:41] I don't want wars. [38:42] I don't want money going to other countries. [38:44] I want every single legal out. [38:46] I want harsher crimes for bad people, murderers, rapists, and all these things. [38:47] That's what I don't understand. [38:48] If he wants to do it, he has the only time left. [38:49] He has power to do all these things. [38:50] He has power to do all these things in this country. [38:51] And, you know, we would like to get mortgage rates down and make the country better and [38:55] more affordable for people. [38:57] And he's not delivering on a lot of those. [38:58] And I'm, I can admit that, you know what I mean? [39:00] You should be criticizing the person you elected, which I don't really see on the other side. [39:05] You know, I mean, you have Harry and all these people, Biden's just perfect. [39:09] He's healthy. [39:10] He's done everything right. [39:11] But I'm like, the thing is you gotta be able to call it out when other people do it as [39:15] well. [39:16] Like I said, we have checks and balances. [39:17] He needs to go by the law or else we kind of just throw everything out. [39:20] And then I don't know. [39:20] I don't know what we are anymore as a country, but at the same time, but at the same time, [39:25] I want that standard held to the pre previous administration's gone. [39:29] I don't think we should go back to the past all the time, but I also want that whoever [39:32] wins next, because I don't know who it's going to be, to be honest, I want them held to that [39:36] as well. [39:37] So I want people like you speaking out when they're doing things like, I think it's crazy [39:40] to remove him off social media, to pressure Facebook, to force people. [39:44] I mean, you know, all of our accounts were deleted, doctors were taking off. [39:47] So it's like, I just want that same energy consistently. [39:50] No matter who's in charge and you should be smart enough to see through the bullshit [39:53] on that. [39:54] And you should agree with that. [39:55] Okay. [39:56] I think that you're clearly drowning in this debate. [39:57] I think I've effectively demonstrated that my claim that Donald Trump wants to be a dictator [40:01] is true. [40:02] And now you're just merely asking me to give that same energy to the other administration. [40:05] So if you want me to have a conversation with you about Biden, go ahead and concede that [40:09] Trump wants to be a dictator and I'll happily talk to you about Biden. [40:12] But literally last time I asked you to do this, the same question you said, no, I don't [40:16] think that Trump wants to be a dictator or else you'd be doing all these things. [40:19] I demonstrate. [40:20] I demonstrate to you how he is doing all these things, so on and so forth. [40:23] So he's doing things that every other administration has done the same way you guys are crying [40:27] about mass deportations. [40:28] He has some of the lowest numbers you're crying about, oh, I don't like the way they did it. [40:32] That's the way they were doing it. [40:33] And Obama's building the cages. [40:34] They're doing all these things. [40:35] But when Trump does anything, it's completely different. [40:38] No one was upset when Obama was dropping bombs on people and he was doing all the same things [40:42] when we were going into war with, I mean, no one on the left says anything about all [40:47] that, but when Trump does it, it's completely different. [40:49] And it does matter when you remove a sitting president off social media, when you go and [40:53] pressure the biggest companies to silence people, to remove conservatives the same way [40:58] TikTok bans us all every week. [41:00] Those things do matter because free speech to me is actually the most important thing. [41:05] So when you're censoring that and you're making it seem like the only ideas in America are [41:09] the mainstream ones on the left, which are insane ideas, then yeah, that is a big deal. [41:13] It does matter and it should be applied to every administration, not just Trump. [41:18] Everything I know. [41:19] Like I go through this every day. [41:20] Okay. [41:21] I'll bite. [41:22] I'll respond to all of that now. [41:23] So one of the suggestions that you made was about the Biden Harris administration telling [41:25] Mark Zuckerberg that they need to kick Donald Trump off. [41:27] First and foremost, they didn't say that if you don't do this, we're going to shut you [41:31] down and there's going to be criminal. [41:32] Censorship across the board. [41:33] One moment. [41:34] And there's going to be criminal punishments. [41:35] That never happens. [41:36] They made a suggestion to Facebook saying, hey, guess what? [41:39] You know, COVID misinformation is bad. [41:41] It'll kill people. [41:42] You should do this. [41:43] And then they did. [41:44] There was no consequences. [41:45] There was nothing bad that was going to happen to Mark Zuckerberg if they didn't, unlike Brendan [41:49] Carr and the FCC under Donald Trump saying, hey, ABC and Disney, guess what? [41:53] You got to kick Jimmy Kimmel off and if you don't, we might revoke your license. [41:58] So it's funny because like I said, in your misrepresentation of what the Biden Harris [42:02] administration did in their conversation with Facebook, you gave me yet another reason to [42:06] describe why Trump wants to be a dictator. [42:09] So there's, so there's no consequences from suppressing data, doctors, all that, things [42:14] that would have changed the outcome of people's lives and the country, the economy, things [42:19] worldwide. [42:19] There was no, none of that matters. [42:21] They just simply pressured him a little and that was it. [42:23] Removing doctors, Republicans, the sitting president, all these things just doesn't matter [42:27] to you. [42:28] It's just crazy. [42:29] This is the argument with every Democrat is anytime Trump does anything, he's Hitler. [42:33] It's bad. [42:34] It's evil. [42:35] But then everything Democrats did somehow, well with them, it's legal. [42:38] It's totally acceptable. [42:40] You know, silencing half the country is totally okay. [42:43] I mean, Republicans even today having to deal with death threats against us, social media [42:47] platforms still being biased against us. [42:49] And not even be to say that it, that misinformation didn't matter. [42:52] That's the one misinformation that actually affected people's lives and is going to for [42:56] the next, you know, however many years until everyone's dead. [42:59] That's why Pfizer is hiding the files for 90 years from us of all the outcome of these [43:02] vaccines and all the data. [43:04] So it's like to say that doesn't matter. [43:06] That's actually one of the only things that does matter because it affects people's health [43:08] and without your health, Trump doesn't really matter. [43:11] Neither does Biden or any of these people. [43:12] I'm out of time to respond. [43:15] So I can't, I'll be responding to that on my personal YouTube channel. [43:18] Of course. [43:19] Yeah. [43:20] The next face off claim is Republicans are more trusted than Democrats to fix the economy [43:23] and help working families. [43:24] Okay. [43:25] Okay. [43:26] Well, to start, uh, you're actually going to find this shocking. [43:29] Same thing with a lot of the viewers at home. [43:31] You're actually technically right. [43:32] Um, you know, for those that don't know, uh, we both like exchange prompts like the day [43:36] before filming. [43:37] So I knew what to expect here. [43:38] I did some research on it. [43:40] There's been a couple of polls done in the last couple of months, uh, where actually, [43:43] yeah, Americans do suggest that they have more trust in Republicans and Democrats for the [43:47] economy. [43:48] Uh, like the Washington Post did. [43:50] I think. [43:51] And that's what it showed. [43:52] What, what, what my counterclaim would be here is that they shouldn't because the Republicans [43:56] are completely destroying the economy. [43:57] The Trump administration has been terrible. [44:00] Last year we saw the worst jobs report since 2003 three of we ignore the 2008 recession [44:05] caused by the Trump administration. [44:06] We saw the most manufacturing bankruptcies since 2008 as well because of the Trump administration [44:12] every single month in 2025 under Trump after liberation day, the imposition of all those [44:16] tariffs. [44:17] We saw less and less manufacturing jobs because of the Trump administration. [44:19] We see a stagnation in the increase of real median wages starting under Trump, uh, which [44:25] was not true during the last two years of Biden Harris administration because of Trump. [44:29] We see a declining amount of real fixed private business investment into American manufacturers. [44:34] And we have seen that every single financial quarter under Donald Trump's second administration [44:38] after a boom in investment under Biden. [44:40] I mean, everything around us seems to be getting worse. [44:43] The odds of a recession are climbing high. [44:46] Markets are terrible. [44:47] Consumer confidence. [44:48] It's like a 15 or 20 year low and uh, no clue why the polls are indicating that Americans [44:53] have more faith in Republicans and Democrats. [44:55] I'd have to chop it up to propaganda or misinformation because clearly the facts say that Trump is [45:00] failing us and the GOP could do significantly better than they are. [45:04] Yeah. [45:05] I looked last night and pretty much no matter what the outlet was, Fox, CNN, ChatGPT, Grok, [45:10] it literally doesn't matter. [45:11] They said across the board, uh, US citizens trust Republicans with the economy more. [45:16] Um, I think when you're pushing the fact that you want to. [45:18] Put Americans first America first agenda. [45:22] You want to bring jobs back to America. [45:23] I think that when you say that it sounds great and that's probably why they're like, yeah, [45:27] we want that guy. [45:28] Uh, you know, I wanted no new wars. [45:30] I want it to be in no wars. [45:32] That's obviously very costly. [45:34] Uh, we're not necessarily getting that right now, which I am not a fan of. [45:38] I criticize the administration every day. [45:41] I know tariffs can be very tough. [45:42] They can have positive outcomes later on as well. [45:45] Um, I say if you want to help Americans and the economy and all that, I'd be like, you're [45:48] like, okay, well we need to get out of war. [45:50] We need to actually get jobs here. [45:53] I would say getting deep mass deportations could be good. [45:56] Um, and I think the biggest thing would be the fact that there's so much fraud. [46:00] I think if we investigate the fraud, Republican and Democrat, like what's going on in Minnesota [46:05] and the Somali and fraud, and there's so much fraud, especially here in California, it's [46:09] probably the worst state. [46:10] I think if we investigate that we could actually get that money back to Americans, but I don't [46:14] think that's a left versus right thing. [46:15] I think that's just a government thing. [46:17] Okay. [46:18] Yeah. [46:18] At some point in that last statement, did you respond to my damnation of the economy [46:22] under the Trump administration? [46:23] So it kind of sounds like you agree that Americans shouldn't trust the Republican party to effectively [46:28] navigate and manage the economy because the Trump administration is failing it. [46:31] Now, if you disagree with me, if you don't think the Trump administration is failing [46:35] the economy, then please respond to the macroeconomic data points that I shared to demonstrate otherwise. [46:39] Okay. [46:40] But here's my issue. [46:41] You have Democrats in charge for however long, like let's say California, for example, it's [46:45] been like 16 years or whatever. [46:47] And then, uh, Gavin Newsom, [46:48] every day is blaming Trump for every single thing. [46:51] And I'm confused because you said everything was going well under the Biden administration. [46:55] Me personally with what I do for a living, I don't get hit the way a normal person gets [46:59] hit. [47:00] Car insurance is high. [47:01] Health insurance is high. [47:02] Everything costs money. [47:04] Everything goes up and up and up. [47:05] Rent is insane. [47:06] Mortgage, all these things. [47:07] Okay. [47:08] I see all that I'm living and I'm part of it, but I'm not necessarily affected by the [47:12] way other people would. [47:14] And you know, so my life isn't increasingly better under Trump besides I would say free [47:18] speech for me is the biggest thing. [47:20] So I'm like, okay, you are kind of putting it out there that like, or Republicans get [47:24] in charge and just everything goes up, everything goes to shit. [47:27] And it was so much better under Biden. [47:29] But I'm like, I don't think me or the average American really feels that way. [47:33] And you could, if the data is there and it's true and it's factual, then that's great. [47:36] I can't argue with that as long as it's a trusting, non-biased source, which doesn't [47:41] really exist. [47:42] But this whole thing of like, everything is so bad. [47:45] I don't think it's that bad. [47:46] I think we just need to focus on America. [47:48] Yeah. [47:49] And stop sending money to every other country and helping all these people. [47:51] And I know, like I said, war is one of the most expensive things and we don't want to [47:56] be a part of that, but I wouldn't say like everything was amazing under Biden and so [48:00] cheap. [48:01] And then now all of a sudden everything's really expensive. [48:03] I don't think the normal, a normal American is experiencing that. [48:06] Okay. [48:07] Well, we can definitely demonstrate a shift in economic trends during the last two years [48:10] of the Biden Harris administration. [48:11] Every financial quarter, we saw more and more investment into American manufacturing. [48:14] We saw booming GDP growth. [48:16] We saw two historical low levels of unemployment. [48:18] 50-year record lows. [48:19] Not to mention that we saw a significant downtrend in inflation on top of pretty awesome strides [48:25] and increases in real median wages, alongside about a billion other things. [48:28] As I already told you, last year, 2025, worst jobs report since 03, ignoring recessions. [48:33] Most manufacturing bankruptcies since 08. [48:35] That's terrible. [48:36] Stagnation in real median wage growth. [48:38] The last year in 2025, the first quarter, we actually had negative GDP growth. [48:41] Only developed country in the world to have that negative GDP growth on top of, like I [48:46] said, about a billion terabytes. [48:47] Yeah. [48:48] There's terrible other things as well, ranging from a sudden decrease in inflation, but simultaneously [48:55] in consideration of all these other factors of a declining economy, like bad GDP growth, [49:00] bad jobs report, bankruptcies, seems to indicate an environment that could actually transpire [49:05] and create a recession. [49:07] It sounds like in response to all that data that I shared with you, your argument was, [49:12] I don't feel that way. [49:13] I mean, facts don't care about your feelings. [49:15] Do you have a counter argument? [49:17] Better than... [49:18] I feel like you're wrong, Dean. [49:19] No, I'm not even saying you're wrong. [49:22] I'm saying that you pretending like under the Biden administration, everything was amazing. [49:26] Now I'm under Trump, it's not. [49:28] That's just not true. [49:29] And let's also talk about why things are so bad, which we're going to probably be feeling [49:34] for the next 50 years. [49:36] Democrats shut down our country and people are forgetting that people lost everything [49:41] because of that. [49:42] The city, I'll speak for California and Los Angeles in general. [49:46] Ever since the pandemic. [49:47] Yeah. [49:48] Which obviously now we know every single thing was a lie and they just destroyed the [49:53] country for no reason. [49:55] Businesses cannot keep afloat here. [49:57] They just simply can't. [49:58] Restaurants are gone. [50:00] Businesses are gone because we have Democrats running the city. [50:03] Crime is up. [50:04] People just stopped reporting crime because there's no point because there's not enough [50:06] cops and they don't come. [50:07] So now they say the crime's down. [50:08] But I'm like, we're forgetting the biggest thing, which really is COVID. [50:12] That took a hit on our country that we are not... [50:14] How is that funny? [50:15] That we're not going to... [50:16] What? [50:17] I mean, everything is hilarious. [50:18] No, not at all. [50:20] People losing their businesses, their mental health, killing themselves, turning to alcohol, [50:25] turning to drugs, losing their job, losing their platforms, free speech, doctors losing [50:31] their... [50:32] They can't practice medicine anymore because they said there might be side effects. [50:34] I mean, that is going to affect our country for, yeah, probably 50 years. [50:38] I don't think we can... [50:39] I don't know if we're going to recover from that. [50:40] And also most people that are not nuts can tell there is a shift in everything since [50:45] then. [50:46] We cannot stay alive here. [50:48] It's just... [50:49] Nothing's been the same and it's really bad. [50:50] And I think people care about that and it's not something to joke about. [50:53] Okay. [50:54] So what I was laughing at is your very sour attempt to look all the way back to the pandemic [50:59] to somehow justify and or explain how the Democrats are responsible for the shift in [51:03] macroeconomic trends that we saw start on January 21st, 2025 with Trump's second administration. [51:09] And it is extra ironic because you actually would blame a lot of the negative economic [51:14] outcomes downstream of the pandemic that were true under the Biden hair. [51:15] I mean, it's just... [51:16] I mean, it's true under the Biden-Harris administration on Biden and Harris, even though they weren't [51:19] caused by them. [51:20] They're caused by the pandemic and they were global trends. [51:22] And your argument there was, well, Biden's president, this is all his fault. [51:26] But somehow you have found a way to reach back into the beginning of Biden's presidency [51:31] years ago to explain why Donald Trump, the current president, is not responsible for [51:37] the economic trends that we see today. [51:40] So that's what I was laughing at. [51:41] Also, spare me the fake outrage. [51:43] You responded to that by saying, what's funny, Dean? [51:45] People are done. [51:46] Moments after, in the last topic that we debated, okay, saying that this VA nurse deserved [51:52] to get murdered by 12 shots in the back by a lawless ice thug. [51:56] So spare me the fake outrage. [51:58] You don't care. [52:00] But what I would like to add on here is that I think this is an emotionally driven position. [52:05] You can't tell me that the economic trends we saw years ago because of the pandemic that [52:09] were straightened out by the Biden-Harris administration, after the pandemic, under [52:13] the Biden-Harris administration. [52:15] We saw 250,000. [52:16] We saw 50-year record low levels of unemployment. [52:18] After the pandemic, we saw a rebound in investment. [52:21] After the pandemic, we saw a rebound in GDP growth. [52:23] After the pandemic, we saw a rebound in mini markets. [52:26] And the one lingering thing that is still affecting many Americans is the price of houses [52:30] and the prices of goods. [52:31] But keep in mind, a lot of the data points that I shared weren't really too concerned [52:34] by prices. [52:35] It's just emotional. [52:36] There's no basis to your position. [52:37] And I only think the reason why you're attempting to reach all the way back into the pandemic [52:41] to justify that I'm wrong and it's all the Democrats' fault is because you don't know [52:44] the data like I do. [52:45] It doesn't seem like you know a lot of things. [52:47] Your only position in this debate is to spark fake outrage, tell me I'm crazy and liberals [52:51] suck when in all reality, I don't think you've opened up a textbook on economics for five [52:56] years. [52:57] Okay. [52:58] So fake outrage from shutting down the country and the world. [53:00] So that's just emotional. [53:02] That never happened. [53:03] We're going to have no effects from that, right? [53:06] Well, what I'm calling fake outrage is when you attempted to crucify me for laughing at [53:10] you. [53:11] Keep in mind, I'm not laughing at the pandemic. [53:12] I'm not laughing at those that lost their lives because of the pandemic. [53:15] I'm not laughing at those that were dictated. [53:16] Okay. [53:16] Attempted to drugs because of the pandemic. [53:18] I'm laughing at you attempting to reach back to the pandemic to create justification in [53:22] a thin air insofar as why Democrats are responsible for the Trump administration's faults today. [53:28] And that's something we should all laugh at just because of how truly ridiculous it is. [53:32] That's not fake outrage. [53:33] That's why I got into this. [53:34] My life was affected by it. [53:36] I lost my job. [53:37] Everyone in my family, my friends, we all lost our jobs. [53:39] We also then were being forced to put vaccines in our body, which everyone that has it will [53:44] have either effects now or later. [53:46] They're lifelong effects. [53:48] So that's affecting a lot of people in the country. [53:51] I'm sure a lot of people got the vaccine, right? [53:53] And so that's not fake outrage. [53:54] That actually changed me and every single person's life. [53:57] I know. [53:58] And we are feeling the effects from that and we're going to continue to feel the effects [54:01] from that. [54:02] We have not bounced back and that's not me blaming Democrats and Republicans. [54:05] I don't, I don't agree with the fact that Trump pushed the vaccine. [54:08] I think that was literally insane to do. [54:10] So it's like, that's not fake outrage. [54:12] That's like all of our lives were affected. [54:14] The city has gone to shit since then. [54:15] And I know. [54:16] And I see it. [54:17] Restaurants can't stay alive. [54:18] Rents are too high. [54:19] The crime's out of control. [54:20] The homeless is out of control. [54:22] And 90% of this stem from the pandemic and the people who were in charge who handled [54:27] it terribly and people lost everything because of it. [54:30] And yeah, I think the country losing everything is a lot more important than one person. [54:35] Yeah, I do care more. [54:36] Okay. [54:37] So first the direct response to the argument to shut it down because it's terrible. [54:41] Once again, we saw under the Biden Harris administration during the last two years, economic trends [54:45] that looked like this. [54:46] See the fingers going down. [54:47] It's negative. [54:48] You cannot just simply baselessly posit that the pandemic that happened all the way back [54:59] here is somehow responsible for the downtrend all the way up here. [55:03] How can you explain the uptrends that came right before it? [55:05] You can't. [55:06] Now, the indirect response that I'd like to give to the theme of what I hear from you [55:09] now is that I heard a lot of me, me, me, me, me. [55:12] I was hurt. [55:13] Therefore I care. [55:14] And I think that. [55:15] It perfectly explains, okay, the self obsessiveness of many Trump supporters with the apathetic [55:23] attitude directed towards everybody else. [55:25] Well, it wasn't you who got killed by that ICE agent, so you don't care. [55:28] It wasn't you who Donald Trump posted on Truth Social about when he was advocating for the [55:32] execution of seven Democrats in Congress, so you don't care. [55:35] It wasn't you when Donald Trump stopped paying out food stamp benefits to 16 million children [55:40] during the last 12 days of the government shutdown and then refused to abide by a court [55:43] order to pay them out. [55:44] Therefore, you don't care. [55:45] It wasn't you when Donald Trump cut 10 million low income Americans off of Medicaid under [55:49] the big, beautiful bill when we already have 51,000 low income Americans die every year [55:53] via lack of access to healthcare, so you don't care. [55:56] I mean, I could go on all day and I think that my point here is clear. [55:59] Legitimately, Emily, this is the third time we've sat down together, yet this is the first [56:03] time I've heard you care about people getting hurt. [56:06] And it's funny because it started with the word me. [56:09] I care that the country goes to shit and I care that people were forced to put poison [56:13] into their body. [56:14] That's going to inevitably probably kill them. [56:15] Yeah. [56:16] But I understand. [56:17] So you have it all. [56:18] You have all the data on your side. [56:19] Democrats are crushing it. [56:20] So why do the people not just continue to vote for them? [56:21] I don't understand. [56:22] If all of that is in front of everybody and it's black and white, they're the best for [56:23] the economy, even though the fraud we see under Democrats is the craziest thing I've [56:24] ever seen in my life. [56:25] Going all the way up to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. [56:26] I mean, it makes sense why they brought all the Somalians here, so obviously they can [56:27] run fraud through them all. [56:28] Because they're not going to run fraud. [56:29] They're going to run fraud. [56:30] They're going to run fraud. [56:31] They're going to run fraud. [56:32] They're going to run fraud. [56:33] They're going to run fraud. [56:34] They're going to run fraud. [56:35] They're going to run fraud. [56:36] Because there's no other point in bringing these people here. [56:37] But I'm like, California, the most fraudulent state. [56:38] The amount of money we have and we piss away. [56:39] And guess what? [56:40] Every week in the news, what is it? [56:41] A new person who's a Democrat. [56:42] Oh, they actually bought a bunch of mansions. [56:43] They're in charge of the homeless money. [56:44] They're city council. [56:45] They bought new mansions, new cars. [56:46] The fraud is the biggest thing I've ever seen in my life. [56:47] I mean, it makes sense why they brought all the Somalians here, so obviously they can [56:48] run fraud through them all. [56:49] Because there's no other point in bringing these people here. [56:50] But I'm like, California, the most fraudulent state. [56:51] The amount of money we have and we piss away. [56:52] And guess what? [56:53] Every week in the news, what is it? [56:54] A new person who's a Democrat. [56:55] Oh, they actually bought a bunch of mansions. [56:56] They're in charge of the homeless money. [56:57] They're city council. [56:58] They bought new mansions, new cars. [56:59] The fraud is the issue. [57:00] And I know it happens on both sides, of course. [57:01] Because the difference is in California, you have L.A., which is just becoming a third [57:02] world shithole. [57:03] And then you have an hour away in Orange County, which is run by Republicans. [57:04] And somehow, you know, we're 45 minutes away from each other and it's pristine there. [57:05] It's perfect. [57:06] And I'm like, why is that? [57:07] I'm like, why is that? [57:08] I'm like, why is that? [57:09] I'm like, why is that? [57:10] I'm like, why is that? [57:11] How are we going to fix any problems when the fraud is this bad? [57:24] Because Democrats go in to clearly rape Americans and take their money, because they're, nothing's [57:35] getting done. [57:36] Nothing's getting done. [57:37] It's never been worse here. [57:38] We rank number one for everything bad. [57:39] Why? [57:40] Because Gavin Newsom's been in charge for how long? [57:41] We have Karen Bass who just let two sons out. [57:41] cities burned down and nothing gets better. But if all of all these talking points, everything [57:45] benefit you and Democrats on your side. And so life should be good under Democrats. Then how come [57:51] people don't just vote for Democrats, even Republicans? Why is that? Well, it's actually [57:55] funny that you asked that question. How come people don't vote for Democrats? We've already [58:00] started to see the blue wave begin. A Democrat won the mayoral race in Miami, Florida for the [58:05] first time in 20 to 30 years, as well as many other elections that I'd love to share with you [58:10] about the upcoming midterms. Okay. Well, in California, we've seen a red wave. We have the [58:15] top two people running for governor of California are both Republicans. Why is that? Because all the [58:20] money we pay in taxes doesn't fix the streets. Homeless has never been worse. Everything is [58:24] unaffordable. Crime is insane. Police don't come. We don't even have enough police to come either [58:28] way. And two cities burned to the ground. What are they focused on? Finding those people to clean up [58:33] their own houses that have burned down. Everyone's leaving. They're trying to do, you know, [58:38] millionaires aren't paying enough tax. Now we're going to do the billionaire tax. [58:40] So what are we having here? A red wave. A red wave because they have done nothing but fail us here.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →