About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Why weren't previous Graham Platner allegations 'DISQUALIFYING'?: Elise Jordan from MS NOW, published July 7, 2026. The transcript contains 1,011 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Welcome back. This morning, we've been covering the growing calls for a main Democratic Senate candidate Graham Plattner to drop out of the race after a woman accused him of sexually assaulting her. The woman detailed her allegations to Politico in a series of three interviews over the past two..."
[0:00] Welcome back. This morning, we've been covering the growing calls for a main
[0:03] Democratic Senate candidate Graham Plattner to drop out of the race after a woman
[0:08] accused him of sexually assaulting her. The woman detailed her allegations to Politico
[0:13] in a series of three interviews over the past two weeks.
[0:17] Now, Graham denies the allegations, calling them, quote, troubling, serious and false.
[0:23] Still, top Democrats who backed Plattner through a number of previous controversies during his
[0:28] campaign have now begun rescinding their endorsements. Meanwhile, last night, former
[0:34] House Speaker Kevin McCarthy suggested Republicans are different and would never cozy up to a
[0:40] candidate who faced accusations of sexual abuse. Let's take a look. Look, we're celebrating 250
[0:47] years. The one thing I know about Republicans, when we had a very bad candidate and found out,
[0:53] we didn't vote for that person. We walked away. For better or for worse. When Matt Gaetz came
[0:58] forward, we got rid of him. Now, he's talking about Gaetz there, I think,
[1:02] when Gaetz was attorney general nominee. But remember, Gaetz as a congressman
[1:05] wasn't voted out. The Republicans didn't back away from him. And more than anything,
[1:10] that's the same Kevin McCarthy, let's remind everyone, who flew to Mar-a-Lago just days after
[1:17] the January 6th insurrection for a photo op with President Trump, who was found civilly liable for
[1:23] sexually abusing and defaming advice columnist, E. Jean Carroll. Trump also, of course,
[1:30] bragged about how he treated women in that Access Hollywood tape back in the 2016 campaign.
[1:36] Let's now bring in contributing opinion writer for the New York Times, Molly Jung Fast,
[1:40] and also the editor of New Republic, Michael Tomaski, MSNOW contributor, Elise Jordan, back with
[1:46] us as well. Thank you all for being here. Molly, let's start with you on the Platinum issue. We can
[1:52] set aside McCarthy's absurd hypocrisy. Let's just focus here. You know, this woman, obviously,
[1:57] very brave in coming forward and telling her story here. And it's one that seems to be,
[2:04] for many Democrats, the breaking point in their support for Plattner. What do you think happens
[2:10] next? So, look, this is a Maine election that takes place in Maine that the people of Maine vote in.
[2:19] And so, the big question, I think, is we saw already from that Times piece that the people
[2:25] of Maine, his numbers were going down, right? We saw the polling that his Maine numbers were down.
[2:31] And so, now the question is, and the Times piece didn't have necessarily, it seemed as if it was
[2:36] sort of nipping around the edges, but it didn't have an allegation like this, which is this full,
[2:43] substantial, you know... Well, it did have him putting her in a room and holding her captive,
[2:49] which, I don't know, and grabbing her a lot. Again... Yeah, I know. I mean, it's not...
[2:55] It's interesting to me, the media debate over this, over what constitutes enough. I...
[3:01] It is not up to me to constitute what is enough. No, no, no.
[3:04] I think it's up to the voters of Maine. And we saw these polls after that Times story came out that
[3:09] said they were starting to really... This fundraising started to fade, too.
[3:13] Right. And so, then, the question is, and again, look, with this story, as someone... I mean,
[3:20] what she says in this story is that she is... I mean, the misogyny that I found in the story was this
[3:27] poor woman is saying it was non-consensual, when it was obviously rape. And she couldn't say that
[3:33] because she was, you know, trying to protect him to some extent. So, in my mind, this is a really
[3:40] serious, you know, as a woman and a mother of a daughter, you know, as serious as it gets. And
[3:48] you see, you know, the ways in which the culture, you know, this victim is protecting this man. So,
[3:54] in my mind, this is, you know, but it's not up to me because I don't even live in Maine.
[3:59] It is up to the voters of Maine. So, Michael, let me go to you with... I'm just fascinated with this,
[4:07] horrified, really, in terms of just what constitutes a red flag in terms of coverage of a political
[4:16] candidate. You have the first-time story being pretty much dismissed in a lot of quarters because
[4:23] the accuser, the victim, had a past of working for right-wing causes. And then certainly these
[4:31] allegations are more extreme of breaking into her home and raping her. But why were the first round
[4:41] of accusations that were pretty egregious and terrible, not seen as enough of a character flaw
[4:49] to be disqualifying? That's a really fair question. Those were bad and really, really
[4:56] disturbing allegations. But I think people at that time, a lot of people, including me, I admit,
[5:02] felt that we needed to weigh those against what appeared to be the will of the Democratic voters
[5:08] of Maine who were very solidly behind Graham Plattner and, you know, who nominated him to the Democratic
[5:18] nomination by a massive margin. So, you know, there were things like that to weigh. There's not much
[5:27] to weigh here. This is a credible allegation of rape, you know, not of physically accosting a woman
[5:35] and locking her in a room. A credible allegation of rape. That's different. In a court of law,
[5:42] he'd be entitled to the presumption of innocence and we'd have to wait for his day in court.
[5:47] A Senate campaign isn't a court of law. It's a political campaign. And we're entitled to make
[5:53] judgments based on what's best for the party and what he should do that would be best for the party.
[6:00] He should go. And yes, it's worth reiterating that his to this point had been rather resilient. He
[6:05] had managed to stay afloat here. This one does feel different. A lot of Democrats calling for drop
[6:10] out rumors. He may do just that in the days ahead. We, of course, will be following this story.