Try Free

WH official tells MS NOW: Zacharia got off on the wrong foot

MS NOW October 13, 2026 12m 2,477 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of WH official tells MS NOW: Zacharia got off on the wrong foot from MS NOW, published October 13, 2026. The transcript contains 2,477 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Peter, you have been in that White House press briefing room maybe more than any of our other colleagues. Ambassador Maloney brought it up just a moment ago. Violation of the Hatch Act and Katie Zachariah's pledge to always tell the truth. Two important points that were made. Let me start by saying"

[0:00] Peter, you have been in that White House press briefing room maybe more than any of our other [0:06] colleagues. Ambassador Maloney brought it up just a moment ago. Violation of the Hatch Act [0:13] and Katie Zachariah's pledge to always tell the truth. [0:19] Two important points that were made. Let me start by saying I've been in that briefing room for, [0:22] I think, each of the last nine press secretaries dating back to Barack Obama's time in office. [0:28] A couple of things that strike me here. One, to the ambassador's point on the Hatch Act, [0:32] I think the first call by reporters, including myself, which I'll make after this, is to the [0:36] Office of Special Counsel, because they, of course, are the government agency that enforce [0:41] the Hatch Act here. You'll remember past press secretaries would often go out of their way to [0:47] say they didn't want to violate the Hatch Act. They didn't want to be politicking as their duty [0:53] as a civil servant there, as a representative of this administration. You're not allowed to do that [0:59] absent the vice president and the president. She obviously did it without solicitation. She offered [1:05] it up, a series of political statements in her first comments. So that would be one of my first [1:10] questions as a takeaway from this. Number two, what was striking to me is that no one, and I acknowledge [1:14] there were only three reporters who were called on there, no one did what has been done in almost each [1:20] of, in almost every one of the cases where a press secretary showed up for the first time, [1:25] which is ask a very fundamental question. This was a job traditionally that was done by the [1:29] Associated Press, because by tradition, the AP, which sits in the front row and the middle seat, [1:34] would have this opportunity. They would ask, as they asked Kareem Jean-Pierre in 2022, [1:39] do you view your primary role here as speaking for the president or promoting his interests, [1:43] or are you committed to providing the unvarnished truth to the American people? To Kayleigh McEnany, [1:48] the AP didn't get the first question. They got the fourth question, but they asked, [1:52] are you planning to do these on a daily basis? And will you pledge never to lie to us [1:56] from that podium? It's a key question that's been done by reporters for years to basically make clear [2:01] to the American people that this person who is going to be speaking on behalf of the president, [2:05] on behalf of the administration, recognizes that their first job is to the truth before anything [2:11] else. That didn't get asked. And then finally, what was striking to me was one of the questions [2:14] from the reporters as it related to the topic of Kimberly Guilfoyle. You've talked about the [2:19] issue about Ukraine, but on Kimberly Guilfoyle, she said, she said, Zachariah said that the White [2:25] House has asked Kimberly Guilfoyle to resign. The reporter said, okay, and moved on to her next [2:30] question. What should have been done there is, has she resigned? Is she no longer serving as the [2:35] U.S. ambassador to Greece? Where is she now? Has the president spoken with her? What is the U.S. [2:41] going to do to hold her accountable for these things for which you believe she should resign? [2:46] None of those follow-up questions were asked, which I think is really critically important. [2:50] And to the point that you and your colleagues, our team there on set with you has been asking, [2:54] this is the unique opportunity, a responsibility of reporters to speak on behalf of the American [2:59] people to get answers to these questions. But more often, I think the biggest difference in this [3:05] briefing room that I've seen over the course of the 15, 14 years that I was covering the White House [3:09] is the changing face of the reporters in that room, where it's so many more influencers and [3:15] sycophants than it is traditional journalists who recognize their advocacy is for the facts before [3:22] it's for either party. And I think that's sadly what's lost more than anything else. [3:26] Wow. I want to just read this to you. Quote from a White House official reacting to Zachariah's [3:33] first press briefing that we got just now. They were granted anonymity to speak candidly to MSNOW. [3:39] Quote, getting behind the podium is tough, but she got off on the wrong foot. She needs to get [3:45] much better fast. Otherwise, she'll break Scaramucci's record. Our colleague Jake Traylor [3:52] just reported this. That's a bit of a wow, Peter, because I'm going to say I watched it thinking Trump [3:59] must be happy as a clam. But the fact that we're hearing this from inside the White House, people [4:04] inside the White House, maybe they're feeling a stroke of courage, you know, sort of or they're [4:10] looking through the lens of Trump's first administration saying we need to put forward a [4:14] front to your original point. We're even seeming like we're here for the American people, while the [4:19] Associated Press maybe didn't have the opportunity to ask, are you here to tell the truth and represent [4:24] the American people? You didn't need to ask that question. The first thing she said was we're just [4:29] coming off a Trump rally. I'm going to go to a whole lot more Trump rallies. Trump rallies are [4:33] not public services for the American people. They're political rallies for the president to [4:39] advance his political agenda. [4:41] This may as well have been a MAGA, Inc., the Super PAC press briefing taking place there, as [4:45] opposed to a White House press briefing taking place there. I agree with everything that you just [4:50] said. In particular, it's interesting to hear that Scaramucci was there for 11 days. I'll never forget [4:54] those days as he was parading up and down the what we call Pebble Beach, where all the tents are, [5:00] and the reporters there do their live shots. But what was particularly interesting to me [5:05] is the way that she came out of the gates, and you guys have made note of this, reading off of her [5:09] notes. Because remember the way the president spoke, I think, in artful, to be generous terms, [5:14] about Caroline Levitt. What he liked is he said when her lips are moving, it was like a machine gun, [5:19] I think was some of his language or something like that. She had, whether you can disagree with her [5:24] policy position, certainly, and oftentimes when she, at best, fudged the facts. But she did have [5:31] a control of her content. She knew what she was speaking about. She had direct access to the [5:36] president. It was obvious in the opening remarks of Zachariah here that she was clearly reading, [5:42] but didn't have any comfort speaking before an audience like this. And the president, who uses [5:47] this phrase, has said it to me and others, is all about central casting. Who looks the part? [5:52] I think by his standards, he would agree she looks the part, but she doesn't deliver [5:57] the part in terms of her ability to communicate an audience and look like she has control of her [6:01] content, her copy, or his position. And I think that's going to be the fundamental challenge she's [6:05] going to face right out of the gates. Big time. That's the problem, is that it's one thing to look [6:12] the part, but you've got to be able to play the part. And that, for this job, means being able to ask [6:16] tough, substantive questions on the fly, off the cuff. It demands competence and content. [6:23] And that's the real open question. The reason she didn't get answered the traditional question [6:26] from the AP is that we all know that the answer doesn't matter, because the real answer is no. [6:32] The Trump press secretary's job at this stage is not to tell the truth. It is to tell Donald Trump's [6:37] truth. No, no, no, that's not true. That is what the job is. But let's not, let's be clear. The job [6:43] hasn't changed. How the president wants the job executed has changed. That's the point I'm making. [6:49] It's the job of being Donald Trump's secretary, not the press secretary for the White House on [6:53] behalf of the American people being a bridge to the press. But we as the American people shouldn't [6:55] move the goalposts because Trump wants us to. Absolutely not. [6:58] We should keep them exactly where they're supposed to be. Where they are. But let's also be honest [7:02] that that is not part of the job qualification he is seeking, nor is it part of the job that the [7:06] person filling this job is trying to do. You're absolutely right. [7:09] OK, you know, I'll just make a quick point that, and Peter and Vaughn brought this up, [7:15] we are a country at war. Service members have lost their lives. This is a good point. And none of this [7:21] has been discussed today from that White House. No questions about it. No real engagement on this [7:29] issue. This country is at war. And it's striking to me that we are in a, we're in a place where this, [7:37] as everybody has said, that this president just wants somebody to look the part. Because what are [7:43] you, what, what are you trying to get across to the American people that this is nothing but [7:48] they're just watching a wrestling match? You know, this is just entertainment. It's spectator [7:52] sport. There are no real issues being discussed here. And this, I go back to the earlier point, [7:58] that any other, we're talking about what typical press secretaries do. What a typical White House would [8:04] do is send people on these message events to tell the American people what their victories are, [8:10] what are their wins. Not telling us, it may not be a political event like who to vote for, [8:15] but it's, it's more of, and I will give her credit for this very small part on what they did in Ohio. [8:22] Like go out and talk about that, but they don't do that kind of stuff. What they do is, [8:27] is just talk about, you know, the, the biggest rally in the history of history. [8:32] But ambassador, here's the thing. When she was asked the question about like, [8:36] how are you going to handle it as a working mom? [8:38] I originally thought that question was so sexist and beneath her station. Yeah. [8:44] But in fact, that's the question she wanted to answer. She actually wanted to answer the question [8:49] about bringing her kids and where her husband's going to be when that's absolutely irrelevant [8:54] to the American people. And, and to Basil's point to military, military moms who are watching this [9:01] desperate for information of what's actually happening in Iran, what will be the plight of [9:05] their children who are serving the country? They don't give a hoot whether or not she's bringing her [9:09] kids to the press briefing room. Yeah. Although, you know, it's an interesting point, right? Because [9:13] I know this will shock all of you, but sometimes reporters can be a little jaded. And, and yet in this [9:20] first encounter, you actually have, you know, you actually get some leeway, right? You get this [9:25] is your first day. Everybody understands that. But, but, but my goodness, she actually had some news, [9:30] which is that, and it's actually, you know, useful for her in that moment, which is we're firing [9:36] Kimberly Guilfoyle, but good. And, and it seems to me if nothing else, you could feed the beast [9:41] and, and give them that to chew on. And there's a lot to chew on, right? Well, you're going to, [9:45] you know, you're going to prosecute her. What the hell is she doing? Who is going to pay the [9:47] Amex bill? I mean, let's, let's be honest. I mean, those bills don't pay themselves. [9:53] So, so, you know, she could have deployed that. It seems to me as a way to, as a way to keep the [9:58] press chewing on something. It is inexcusable to me that you don't have an answer on Ukraine. [10:02] And then as Vaughn points out, you're sort of making news by not saying anything, which is, [10:07] I've been on the House Intelligence Committee. There's only two things we really do for the [10:10] Ukrainians. We give them intelligence and we, we give weapons that the Europeans pay for. [10:14] But that's why not answering, not answering that question is massively newsworthy. [10:21] I'm not sure that she doesn't know the answer. I'm sure that she's not giving the answer. [10:25] There is a way to answer that question, which, which is to tread water, even if you need to get [10:30] clarification on it. I don't think she passed that test. I think it made her seem unprepared [10:35] and it left a real question mark over a very important foreign policy issue. And then to Basil's [10:40] point and yours, there's real stuff going on out there. And, and if my kids serving on the [10:44] U S Abraham Lincoln, you know, I want to know somebody down there is paying attention and they [10:49] got a strategy to get us, get us out of this war. You know, if you're a farmer paying six 50 for diesel, [10:54] you're like, how long are we doing this? And you're not getting anything from this. And so [10:58] just to pull the lens back for someone trying to do politics, their politics are terrible right now. [11:02] And we're, we're three weeks out from the midterms where a thumping [11:05] is coming and none of this stuff is going to stop it. But it reads like the late Roman empire, [11:11] right? I mean, this is, this is an administration that's more concerned about how someone looks than [11:15] the substance and the reality of the job. And it doesn't, it hurts America, right? Because the [11:20] world looks at this as the white house press secretary and sees the person cannot answer [11:25] a direct question about whether the U S is sharing intelligence to Ukraine after we just violated a whole [11:30] bunch of laws in that particular hearing. We had a 16 minute first day press briefing with [11:35] precisely one minute of substance. And for the president, that's a feature, not a bug. [11:40] Hey, it's Rachel. I am so glad to see you at the end of that clip, because this is where I get to [11:44] tell you about a new way to watch all our clips and all of our shows and everything on MSNOW on your [11:51] phone or your tablet or your laptop. You can watch things live or recorded. Plus you can ask me and all [11:57] the other hosts and reporters questions in our weekly live chats. You can go to MS.now slash membership [12:05] or just click below. Thanks.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →