Try Free

See Chris and Jen instantly react to the White House Correspondents' Dinner

MS NOW July 25, 2026 10m 2,134 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of See Chris and Jen instantly react to the White House Correspondents' Dinner from MS NOW, published July 25, 2026. The transcript contains 2,134 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Now I'd like to bring to my colleague Jen Psaki, hosted a briefing with Jen Psaki and former press secretary to President Joe Biden. You kind of know this dynamic from both sides. You're someone who has been on sort of both sides of what can be a fraught dynamic is always sort of weird and..."

[0:00] Now I'd like to bring to my colleague Jen Psaki, hosted a briefing with Jen Psaki and former press [0:04] secretary to President Joe Biden. You kind of know this dynamic from both sides. You're someone [0:11] who has been on sort of both sides of what can be a fraught dynamic is always sort of weird and [0:16] complicated and I think psychologically strange, you know, like what is that relationship? And [0:24] it's adversarial, but you're human beings, you're spending time together. The things that Michael [0:27] is saying we're true, it's sort of natural. And yet we're in a completely different world now and [0:33] there's something strange about the juxtaposition of how different the world is and the room looking [0:38] the same way, if I can say that, right? That's kind of odd about this moment. [0:43] No question about it. I mean, I will say not to make it less sexy than people make it seem, [0:48] but most of the time the source in the room is like the staff director for the budget committee [0:54] who's sitting next to a reporter, an economics reporter from the Washington Post, and they're [0:58] talking about the budget negotiations and that informs the reporting. That's most of the time. [1:03] And the vast majority of reporters in that room most of the time are not people who are easily [1:07] swayed by people just because they had rubber chicken next to each other at a dinner. But yes, [1:11] we're in a very different time right now. And as everybody has outlined through the course of your [1:15] show, I mean, this is a president who has taken on the press, attacked the rights of the freedom of [1:22] press, the right to free speech more than anyone else with every lever of his power. [1:27] And now he's standing in this room and not standing currently. His eyelids are looking a little heavy, [1:32] might I note. But, you know, he's going to be standing in this room and delivering a speech to [1:37] this group of people. The one thing I will say that I have noted, and I'd be interested if you agree or [1:41] not, I mean, is a year and a half ago in the beginning of this administration, it was I mean, [1:47] we could do a story every single day about how the press were acquiescing, how major news [1:51] organizations were acquiescing to the Trump administration from the Barry Weiss era, which [1:57] we're still in, to ABC, to Jimmy Kimmel period of time. I do think we're seeing more pushback from [2:04] news organizations punching back, including The New York Times and others. That's important to see. [2:09] Are there exceptions to that? Is it enough? No. But it is a change in garden. A lot of those people [2:14] are in the room tonight for that, too. I completely agree. I think that's true. I think that's true [2:20] surveying the entire landscape of civic institutions in a free society. Right. So like the law and the [2:28] law firms and the universities and the press. Right. There's all these things. There's like, [2:32] you know, what makes up an open society? There's all these. There's the government. [2:35] There's businesses. Right. And then there's this whole landscape that is all things that aren't [2:41] one of those two things. And that's religious organizations and it's political parties, [2:46] it's community organizations. And yes, I totally agree. I think, you know, the media is one of the [2:51] tentpoles of that. But I think we have seen people get tougher. And honestly, you know, the irony here [2:56] is for all the manipulation and browbeating of the press, for all the attempts to kind of control it [3:01] through regulatory fiat. The guy's pulling at 34 percent this week. So this has not been if the [3:08] if the idea is we will control the press and our buddy Elon Musk owns Twitter and our other buddy is [3:13] going to buy this and that's going to allow us to propagandize the American people who are going to [3:18] love us like that is plainly not working. Right. It's not working. I mean, I also think and you [3:25] talked about the journalists who are going to get awards tonight. And as we watch that, because I've sat [3:29] through through this many of times, people should know that typically what happens is those awards [3:33] are given out. And then everybody on the dais, including the president, shakes the hand and [3:38] congratulates the reporters who get the award. So we can watch for that and see if that happens. [3:43] But Tyler Pager, Tyler Pager, the story, who you probably know. I mean, he's 31, 32 years old. [3:51] He was a well-meaning, good reporter, thorn in my side when I was the White House press secretary [3:58] because of his relentlessness in covering the Biden administration. Now he's getting an award for his [4:03] reporting on the Trump administration. Things like how much the donations of Timothy Mellon to [4:10] K4 troops, right? The behind the scenes story behind the Zelensky Trump meeting. These are things the [4:16] public wants to know about. Right. And he was also a reporter who received a subpoena just two weeks [4:23] ago. And guess what he did today? He reported another story about the Qatari jet. Point is, [4:28] like, I'm not sure a lot of these people are not exactly counting to Trump's efforts here. And we see [4:34] that in evidence, right? Yeah. We've also reached, we should just note, we've reached the eye resting [4:40] portion of the evening. Sometimes, you know, if you're standing for a long time, you get tired, [4:43] you sit down, you rest your legs. Donald Trump's eyelids are like everyone else's legs. If he's, [4:47] if they're open, they start to, they get a little fatigued and he needs to arrest them. Now, I will [4:53] say, I can't imagine something more boring to Donald Trump than people giving speeches about like [4:59] the First Amendment and the power of the press and talking about things other than Donald Trump. [5:04] So we're not surprisingly seeing him, seeing him check out a bit. I do wonder too, like, [5:11] you know, the, the, the, the ownership structure part of this, right, is, is interesting because that [5:16] was the other thing that we saw early on was the, you know, take Disney, for example, right? Disney [5:22] settles that George Stephanopoulos lawsuit, which I think was a bad suit. You know, I don't have eyes [5:27] into the internal deliberations out of it, but I think it was a bad suit. They settled it. I think it [5:32] set a bad mark. It, it, it, and Trump sort of lords it over them, right? And I think Disney was scared [5:38] at some level about reprisal from a government that they need regulatory things from. That, that part of [5:47] it at the highest echelons and levels also seems to be subsiding a little. Like clearly that's still [5:53] in the case with the Time Warner acquisition with Paramount, stuff like that. But again, more fight, [5:59] other parties now getting involved in trying to block that acquisition. Disney, the second time [6:04] around, just kind of like not taking Kimmel off the air and kind of brushing it off. Like there's, [6:09] there is a lot of that even at the highest level. That is true. Even at the highest levels and big [6:14] corporate levels, not all of them, but certainly Disney's a good example. I also think we've seen, [6:21] I mean, Sarah Fitzpatrick's story about Kash Patel from several weeks ago that the Atlantic put out [6:26] that he threatened to sue them, right? Then Jeffrey Goldberg came out with a scathing response [6:31] and Sarah Fitzpatrick did another story about it. So even news organizations that aren't as enormous, [6:38] that don't have the resources of an enormous corporate entity are also like, you know what? [6:43] Bully trying to take my lunch money. I'm not going to give you my lunch money because otherwise [6:47] you're going to come back and ask for my lunch money again. And that's, that's a good sign. [6:53] Josh Dossi, I believe getting an award up there, a great reporter for the Wall Street Journal. [6:57] I do feel duty bound to know it as we talk, how weird it would be if I just went like this while [7:01] you're talking to me. Like it would be strange. People would remark on it. It's, it's become, [7:09] it's become something that just happens all the time. But obviously if anyone else did that, [7:13] or if you were in a meeting or you're in the middle of an interview and someone did that, [7:16] it would be notable. You would remark on it. [7:19] It would be notable, Chris, that we've sat on panels for hours and hours together watching a [7:24] variety of events that could be described as not exactly earth shatteringly exciting at all moments. [7:30] And neither of us have closed our eyes that I recall. But yes, that appears to be what's [7:35] happening right now while we're watching, though clapping aggressively. [7:37] What do you, what do you think about this sort of question about, you know, talk to reporters. [7:44] I think you and I are in a different position. You know, we, we, we're, we're sort of on networks [7:49] and have shows that have sort of our names and our voices and, and, and people are sort of watching [7:52] us. It's like, we were telling you what we think, right? That's the, that's the bargain. [7:56] We have the viewer, right? I'm going to tell you what I actually think. That's, that's not true for [8:00] a ton of people in the press. And many people in the press are, you know, the, the, the, [8:03] the sort of norms around what they're doing is they're not telling what they're thinking. [8:07] They're sort of reporting the facts or letting the story speak for itself. [8:10] And there's a, there's a feeling that Donald Trump wants to kind of go with war, [8:15] to war with the press, to make them the enemy, because he wants to kind of make them seem [8:21] politically toxic to the 40% of the country that sort of, he has a lock on or the 38 or 34%, [8:27] and that the press does itself a disservice if they seem to be playing into going to war with him. [8:32] That's one argument. The argument, the other side is it's kind of crazy when a person's [8:37] going to war against you to sort of pretend like he isn't and to kind of keep conducting [8:42] business as normal. And again, I think there's sort of arguments on both sides. I think there [8:45] are people with good faith and really people I respect who are in different parts of that debate, [8:50] depending on where they're in the landscape. But what do you think about that debate? [8:54] I mean, I think Trump is a dog that doesn't have very many new tricks, right? And so he has long [9:00] thought that if he bullies the press, they're going to acquiesce. And for a period of time, [9:06] a number of organizations did, and in a relatively recently. That has been changing to some degree, [9:13] as we've been talking about. One of the things I think is interesting in terms of how we talked [9:17] about it in the Oval Office today is he kind of suggested, I'm not going, and he said this recently, [9:23] I'm not going after the press. I'm going after the people internally. The press are just a means of [9:28] getting there. And this is also their argument around the lawsuits, right? And sweeping up [9:33] journalists in that. I think that's total BS, but it's almost like he's changing his own spin [9:39] to try to say, because maybe he recognizes he's losing this a bit. [9:43] Well, let's just say, and on this note, no one is more obsessed with the press and kind of loves [9:49] the press in a weird fetishistic way than Donald Trump, who is like, has been a press hound his entire [9:55] life, has been called people up with a fake name, John Barron, to work them, was constantly [9:59] tabloids, like loves reading about himself. Like, no one has a more dysfunctionally obsessive [10:04] fetishistic focus on media press coverage press than the individual on your screen right there. [10:10] Like, this is someone who cares more than anyone ever should care, frankly, about stuff. [10:17] Yes. [10:18] He wants to be loved so much, you know? And I always think, Chris, about when he met with [10:25] Barack Obama in the Oval Office right after he got elected in 2016, and he kept asking him, [10:30] how are you so popular? Not about a lot of other things that you might want to know if you're an [10:36] incoming president, because he wants to be loved. Right? That's it. [10:40] How do the nuclear codes work?

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →