Try Free

Reporters break down Iran war and its election year impacts on "Face the Nation"

Face the Nation and CBS News April 5, 2026 8m 1,583 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Reporters break down Iran war and its election year impacts on "Face the Nation" from Face the Nation and CBS News, published April 5, 2026. The transcript contains 1,583 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"We turn now to our political panel. David Sanger is the White House and national security correspondent for the New York Times and the author of New Cold Wars. Paperback copies coming out on Tuesday. You should check that out. Amy Walter is the publisher and editor-in-chief of the Cook Political..."

[0:00] We turn now to our political panel. David Sanger is the White House and national security [0:04] correspondent for the New York Times and the author of New Cold Wars. Paperback copies coming [0:09] out on Tuesday. You should check that out. Amy Walter is the publisher and editor-in-chief of [0:12] the Cook Political Report with Amy Walter. And Jeff Mason is a Washington correspondent at [0:17] Bloomberg, making his Face the Nation debut. So Jeff, at least under my rules, you get the first [0:23] question. This past week, the White House tried selling the war with Iran as a good thing. Then [0:29] we had this fighter jet shot down. Both personnel on board have now been rescued. How's that sales [0:36] pitch landing with the American public? Well, number one, I think it's right to call it a sales [0:40] pitch. And it's a late sales pitch. The president did not give an address like that at the beginning [0:44] of the war, which most presidents would do before a military conflict. Number two, in that address [0:50] on Wednesday night, he really used sales pitchy language, talking about how long previous wars [0:55] have been, how this is not going to be that long, going back to World War I and World [0:59] War II. But then the political risk to those remarks and his entire sort of strategy rhetorically [1:07] skyrocketed after an airplane was shot down in Iran. So certainly the fact that they have found [1:13] that crewman is a huge political win for him. But there is still substantial political risk, [1:18] because to your question, this is a very unpopular war. There's still some support [1:23] within his base for it, but polling shows that Americans writ large do not. So this is still [1:29] one of the ways that we should be dealing with this crisis. [1:33] So why is this, what you call the two to three-week conversation, more rooted in perhaps economic [1:39] considerations and military goals, at least based on your report? [1:41] He is under significant pressure because of the gasoline prices being up. It also has taken away, [1:45] speaking of rhetoric, a talking point that he's been very happy to use for the last year and a half, [1:50] saying that he's responsible for having brought prices down. Now he is clearly responsible for having [1:55] brought prices up, and that's something that Americans will think about when they go to the polls. [1:59] really at least that's not the focus right now um we i mean our polling for example 84 of republicans [2:06] are still with him on this war but nearly 70 of independents disapprove of military action [2:11] this is all i mean it's it's april churning up turning towards trouble in november right yes [2:17] now look it is only april so we still have time for this to move its way through the process [2:24] and it is true that the president now is looking at his lowest approval ratings [2:29] of his second term this week and a lot of that is driven by the fact that he's lost the sort of [2:36] strong support from republicans i don't think republicans have left him i just think that they [2:41] are feeling very dispirited and that is what gets republicans the most nervous is intensity and [2:48] enthusiasm democrats are fired up republicans are not if that continues as we move through [2:56] this electoral season that [2:59] is when things get really bad for the republican party in november david uh this rescue operation [3:05] successful elaborate uh and and was executed in under 48 hours but what do you make of [3:11] it and what we've heard from the president this morning a bunch of language we can't repeat on [3:15] broadcast television so um first we should all celebrate the fact that they've got both these [3:21] crew members it's a miracle and it's an equal miracle that you could put hundreds of troops [3:26] in to get them out and no casualties there [3:30] we've lost six aircraft in the past um a couple of days uh they can be replaced or repaired [3:38] but the fact of the matter is that that tells you there's accelerating risk here [3:42] and if you took the president's threat this morning to go after uh bridges and go after [3:49] the electric grid we'll set aside for a moment ed the fact that these would probably be war crimes [3:55] under the geneva convention the white house will argue it wasn't because it also feeds the military [4:00] if you set that aside the fact remains that the president still finds himself in a box here [4:07] he's trying to open up the straight that was a problem that got created after the war started [4:14] he has not really explained how he's going to deal with the nuclear material and near bomb grade [4:19] material he said that was a reason to go in this past week he said oh i don't really care about it [4:24] that much it's buried deep we'll watch it on satellite well we were watching it on satellite [4:29] before the war started [4:30] right and i know he says there's been regime change but we haven't seen much regime change [4:37] here we have just seen the change of personnel so he's got a lot of things to go accomplish [4:43] if he's going to get out of this and be able to claim to those voters [4:47] that he got something out of it and more to that point the budget that he put forward this week [4:53] is spending so much more money on the military than on domestic priorities and that goes that's right [5:02] and that cuts against everything with you're saying we need to make life more affordable [5:06] our number one priority is to make life more affordable for americans to release a budget [5:12] that increases money only for the military and then cuts domestic programs is not a great pitch [5:19] and he made that astounding comment that because the federal government should only be focused [5:23] on military protection the state should pay for medicare medicaid and daycare and it was caught [5:27] on camera probably coming to campaign ads near us soon i was just going to say you know what [5:32] how both Republicans and Democrats hear a quote that they think, oh, that's going to [5:37] be the lead of my next campaign ad. [5:39] That's one for Democrats. [5:40] And he risks not just losing some Dems, certainly, and independents going into this election, [5:46] but he's testing the tolerance of his base. [5:49] I was at CPAC a little over a week ago, and there were a lot of grassroots supporters [5:53] there who said, we still support President Trump, we still support this war. [5:58] But there were certainly some who started to question it, and we've also seen quite [6:02] a bit of division at the leader level of MAGA and Republicans, and that messaging sinks [6:07] down to the base as well. [6:09] In our remaining moments, Amy, I want to start with you. [6:11] You heard Governor Moore, more than happy to criticize the war effort, but failed to [6:16] provide any specifics on what he'd do differently. [6:18] And that, while Republicans are in a bit of a pickle this year, Democrats aren't much [6:23] liked for that very reason. [6:24] No, this is what's going to be fascinating. [6:26] This 2028 election cycle that we are very close to bumping into, believe it or not, [6:32] is going to be a big one. [6:32] It's going to be the first election in 10 years where Donald Trump is not the centerpiece [6:36] of it, or where candidates would do well to not make Donald Trump the centerpiece of [6:42] it. [6:43] I think Americans are looking for, for both parties, an idea of who these parties are, [6:47] what they stand for, what they're going to do for me, rather than how they're going [6:50] to fit into a world that Trump has really dominated politically for the last many, many [6:55] years. [6:56] Yeah, I gave him credit for the idea. [6:58] I was intrigued by that buckets theory that he had, but he clearly couldn't fill it yet. [7:02] Yeah. [7:03] And that's part of the problem. [7:04] This is what, and this is, we're at this place, and you know because you're going to be at [7:07] a lot of these games, this is spring training for politicians right now, and this is how [7:10] they get their swings in. [7:12] In our remaining minute, David, I'd be remiss if we didn't mention today the ouster of Army [7:16] Chief of Staff General Randy George, essentially pushed out by Pete Hegseth. [7:21] What is removing someone like him do to the officer ranks and to the rank and file overall? [7:27] So I think what surprised people is the degree to which Secretary Hegseth has reached one [7:31] way down into the system. [7:33] And the split with Randy George was in part over Hegseth's insistence that they not promote [7:41] two black and two women candidates for one star general. [7:46] Very rare you'd see anybody get into that. [7:50] Just one last quick point on your interesting interview with Governor Moore. [7:55] What I think Democrats have to get their heads around now is what are they going to say about [8:00] Iran? [8:01] Yeah. [8:02] And we leave nuclear material there. [8:04] What are they going to say about the priorities of a president who has not emphasized China, [8:09] which we have been told is the existential political and economic and technological competitor? [8:16] We haven't heard that from them. [8:17] We have not. [8:18] We will wait to hear from them about that in the coming months. [8:22] Thank you all for being here.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →