About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of ‘Incredibly shameful’: Rep. Garcia slams lawmakers on handling of Bondi testimony from MS NOW, published April 7, 2026. The transcript contains 1,421 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Joining us now, Democratic Congressman of California, Robert Garcia, ranking member of the House Oversight Committee. Good to have you back on the program, Congressman. Have you spoken to the chairman about this? So our teams have been communicating, but I spoke to Chairman Comer not too long ago,..."
[0:00] Joining us now, Democratic Congressman of California, Robert Garcia,
[0:03] ranking member of the House Oversight Committee.
[0:06] Good to have you back on the program, Congressman.
[0:08] Have you spoken to the chairman about this?
[0:12] So our teams have been communicating, but I spoke to Chairman Comer not too long ago,
[0:16] and I think we all reminded him that at the end of the day,
[0:20] this subpoena that's in place for the attorney general was a vote of the entire committee.
[0:24] And so that subpoena has already gone out.
[0:27] The attorney general is set to appear on April 14th.
[0:30] The only way to reverse that decision is for the entire committee to actually take a re-vote
[0:36] because it was bipartisan.
[0:38] All Democrats, a handful of Republicans, including Representative Mace that you just referenced.
[0:43] And so as far as we're concerned, this subpoena is moving forward.
[0:47] We need her testimony.
[0:48] Why are half of the Epstein files not presented to the Congress yet?
[0:51] Why was Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a less secure facility?
[0:54] There are real questions for the AG.
[0:56] And now that she is leaving her office, I think, which was the right decision,
[1:00] she has a chance.
[1:00] To be honest with the American public and to be honest with the Congress.
[1:04] Well, do you think there is, though, a chance that he pushes it to a re-vote?
[1:08] And if there is a re-vote, can you hold those numbers?
[1:12] I think we would hold those numbers.
[1:13] I think it would be, one, incredibly shameful to now somehow want to hide the truth.
[1:19] I mean, we've heard from AGs and former AGs as relates to the Epstein case.
[1:24] We've had these these depositions of the idea that someone that's about to be under oath
[1:29] in just about two weeks in front of our committee.
[1:31] Somehow we're going to re-vote to not allow her to actually speak, I think, is an insult
[1:36] to the investigation and, quite frankly, to the survivors.
[1:39] The survivors are demanding.
[1:41] They want Pam Bondi to be questioned.
[1:43] And the fact that Republicans would go against their vote and take a re-vote, I think, is
[1:49] pretty ridiculous.
[1:49] And I would expect that the Republicans that voted with us in that initial subpoena would
[1:54] hold their votes.
[1:56] We have seen, though, Congressman, and you well know this, that Pam Bondi can be combative
[2:00] when giving public testimony.
[2:02] Before Congress.
[2:03] So let's say she does appear.
[2:05] Do you have a real hope that, first of all, she might have a different approach, given
[2:10] she's no longer working for the Trump administration, and that you would learn something
[2:14] substantive from her?
[2:17] I mean, of course, that would be our hope.
[2:19] Look, I think, obviously, the AG, we've seen her in other hearings.
[2:23] This would be her first hearing, though, exclusively on the Epstein investigation.
[2:27] I think that's something the American public and the survivors are demanding, but deserve.
[2:33] As it relates to her testimony, she has a real opportunity now.
[2:37] She's not going to be working for the president here very soon.
[2:41] So she has a real opportunity to do right by the survivors, to be honest, to give the
[2:46] full truth under oath, and perhaps we can gain some information.
[2:49] Look, there's been a cover-up happening at the White House as it relates to the Epstein
[2:54] files.
[2:55] Well, now is her chance for the truth.
[2:57] Now is her chance to actually uplift and support the stories of the survivors.
[3:01] And so that's going to be on her.
[3:02] But we've got some real questions and tough questions prepared for her.
[3:06] And, of course, this is all in about two weeks.
[3:08] April 14th is the date.
[3:09] So we expect her to come in.
[3:11] Four people familiar with the situation tell MSNOW that President Trump is considering
[3:15] a number of possible replacements for Bondi.
[3:17] They include the EPA administrator, Lee Seldon, Republican Senator Eric Schmidt,
[3:22] U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, former Trump lawyer Alina Haba, and, of course,
[3:27] the interim AG now, Todd Blanch.
[3:29] Would you have confidence in any of those potential picks?
[3:32] I would.
[3:34] I would not.
[3:35] And for a couple of reasons.
[3:36] I mean, one, let's not forget who the president is.
[3:39] The president is the one that has weaponized the Department of Justice.
[3:43] He's been the one that's been pushing the DOJ and the FBI to attack and weaponize against
[3:49] his political enemies.
[3:50] And so anyone that he selects, particularly from that list, their job is going to be to
[3:54] protect Donald Trump, not to carry out justice, not to actually support the mission of the
[3:59] DOJ, which should be separate from the White House.
[4:03] And that's always been the case.
[4:04] And you've had that from both Republican and Democratic AGs.
[4:07] And now we have something completely different.
[4:09] Donald Trump expects whoever the attorney general is not to work for the people, but to work
[4:14] directly for him.
[4:15] The attorney general is not the president's lawyer.
[4:19] That's not the job of the attorney general.
[4:20] But I think that's what his expectation is.
[4:22] And so we'll see who he selects.
[4:23] But look, it's someone like Todd Blanch.
[4:25] I mean, Todd Blanch has been at the center of the Epstein Files cover-up from the DOJ.
[4:30] That's Donald Trump's former personal lawyer.
[4:32] And so what you see on that list is a lot of people who have been at the center of the EPSI files cover-up from the DOJ.
[4:32] And so what you see on that list is a lot of people who have been at the center of the EPSI files cover-up from the DOJ.
[4:32] And so what you see on that list is a lot of people who have been at the center of the EPSI files cover-up from the DOJ.
[4:36] I want to ask you before you go about what's unfolding in Iran right now, where, of course,
[4:41] there is a search operation underway for the one crew member of the downed U.S. fighter jet in Iran
[4:45] who has not yet been recovered.
[4:48] And obviously, our major concern right now is for him.
[4:52] It's for the very highly trained professionals who are working to rescue him.
[4:58] Having said that, what do you think this means for the war going forward?
[5:01] I mean, look, my position,
[5:05] it hasn't changed from day one.
[5:07] We're in a war with no clear mission, no clear objective, and no clear outcome.
[5:12] I think it's a shame what's happening.
[5:14] Obviously, all of our thoughts right now and our prayers are with the families and everyone that's being impacted.
[5:22] But at the end of the day, Donald Trump should be focused on affordability,
[5:26] focused on lowering the cost of gas, lowering the cost of groceries, which are going through the roof.
[5:30] But we're seeing across this country health care costs go up, gas costs go up.
[5:35] Groceries are not.
[5:36] That's not coming down.
[5:36] And now we're in another four-four.
[5:37] Well, then can I ask you, do you worry, Congressman, that this could extend the war and, by extension,
[5:45] the economic problems that have occurred as a result of it?
[5:50] Sure.
[5:51] But I don't think that we had some sort of exit strategy in the first place.
[5:54] I mean, Donald Trump addressed the nation just a day ago, and he said nothing about
[6:00] us actually exiting the war.
[6:02] And, in fact, we were expecting some type of direction, and we got nothing.
[6:06] So, as far as I'm concerned—
[6:06] Well, I think this is a great question.
[6:07] This is a great question.
[6:08] And I think this is a great concern.
[6:09] Donald Trump right now is in it for himself.
[6:10] He has no interest, actually, in actually closing this gap that people are facing here
[6:15] on the ground in the United States as it relates to their own affordability.
[6:18] And I am concerned that this war continues to go on with no mission.
[6:22] We're losing American lives.
[6:24] People, of course, are being impacted.
[6:26] Now we have this rescue mission that's happening right now, and we have no direction.
[6:31] We're spending billions and billions of dollars.
[6:34] We can be using those funds to actually focus on support.
[6:36] We're not going to be spending billions on those dollars.
[6:36] And we're not going to be spending billions on those dollars.
[6:36] I think that's a big question.
[6:37] I think that's a big question.
[6:37] supporting families, child care, health care expansion, facing our roads and our schools
[6:41] across this country. But instead, we continue to invest in a foreign war that nobody wants.
[6:47] Congressman Robert Garcia, thank you.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →