Try Free

Face the Nation: Cotton, Himes, Van Hollen

Face the Nation June 4, 2026 28m 5,174 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Face the Nation: Cotton, Himes, Van Hollen from Face the Nation, published June 4, 2026. The transcript contains 5,174 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"we're joined now by the chairman of the senate intelligence committee arkansas republican tom cotton good to have you here senator thanks margaret you have oversight of the intelligence community which was deeply involved in this operation to go into venezuela militarily and extract nicholas maduro"

[0:00] we're joined now by the chairman of the senate intelligence committee arkansas republican [0:04] tom cotton good to have you here senator thanks margaret you have oversight of the intelligence [0:09] community which was deeply involved in this operation to go into venezuela militarily and [0:16] extract nicholas maduro and his wife does the u.s still assess that the regime in venezuela [0:23] is made up of narco terrorists with ties to iran russia china and cuba well first off let me [0:30] commend not only our military as president trump said this was an excellent operation only the [0:34] united states military could have pulled it off but they couldn't have pulled it off with the [0:37] support without the support of the professionals and the intelligence community especially [0:42] at the central intelligence agency and i'm glad that we have a director john rackliff that has [0:47] restored confidence in the ca and the president the president has i think the president respects [0:51] the ca as much as he ever as or ever has it's a great day not just for our military for our cia [0:57] uh there's no question that the people in venezuela who are still in charge of the apparatus of the [1:02] government are sanctioned and indicted officials and they've been in league with nicholas maduro until [1:08] just yesterday i think president trump wants to give them a chance to turn a new page now that's happened [1:14] in the past if you look at what's happened in syria as you know ahmed al-share used to be an islamic [1:19] terrorist he he's now effectively a pro-american leader of syria muammar qaddafi the same way had much [1:26] blood on his hands after the iraq war he turned over a new page and came out of the cold now the [1:31] difference in those two cases is they made concrete concessions to the united states and our policy [1:35] goals and interests or they had a longer history of turning the corner like ahmed al-share has [1:42] we've got we've got to make sure that the people who are now in charge of the apparatus of the [1:47] venezuelan government are not going to continue nicholas maduro's ways and i think that's what the [1:51] president made clear yesterday but it sounds like you think that's actually possible for these [1:55] individuals to cut all ties to the cartels the president the president wants to give them a [1:59] chance to turn the page in venezuela and to help america achieve our policy goals there how much [2:04] time would you allow for that i wouldn't allow much personally but i know those conversations are [2:09] ongoing as secretary rubio said earlier on the show in your interview we want them to stop the drug [2:14] and the weapons trafficking we want them to take the refugees back we want them to kick out the [2:18] iranians the cubans the islamic radicals like hezbollah and just return to being a normal [2:24] nation that will help build stability order and prosperity not just in venezuela but in our [2:29] backyard should a free and democratic venezuela still be a goal of the united states of america and [2:34] if so do you hear from the administration a plan to transition to that i think it should secretary [2:39] rubio wasn't i think it should be a goal uh the opposition leaders uh miss machado mr gonzalez have [2:44] said they think there need to be new elections um i hope the government that's right now in place [2:50] in venezuela will allow them to return along with many other exiles who have left political exiles [2:54] who have left venezuela and that in some uh period of time it probably is not going to be days or weeks [3:00] maybe a number of months you can have new elections in venezuela that are free and fair the venezuelan [3:05] people have made clear now um under nicholas maduro that they do not want a chavista regime governing them [3:11] they want to say in their own future venezuela has a long history of stable orderly government that was [3:17] friendly to the united states we are their number one customer for oil and we work together to help [3:22] build prosper prosperity and stability in our own backyard i hope that we can do that again with the [3:27] future government in venezuela the cia cbs is reporting that the cia source inside the venezuelan [3:34] government helped the u.s track maduro's location leading up to this capture by the army's delta force [3:40] the president said yesterday the u.s should not pay out that 50 million bounty that was on the head of [3:45] maduro does that mean that the cia asset inside still works for us well i have no comment on cia [3:53] sources or methods in venezuela or elsewhere but they won't be receiving the 50 million reward i'll [3:59] simply say that the cia's amazing work here uh that has instilled such confidence in the president [4:04] is a reminder not just to nicholas maduro's cronies in venezuela but other bad guys all around the world [4:12] that we have very good insights into what they're doing and what they're up to so when the president [4:17] says we will run venezuela you are confident that there are actual american assets helping to do that [4:24] is that how i should i'm confident that we have very good insight into venezuela and other adversaries [4:30] foreign nations and terrorist groups around the world that's why the president that's why the president [4:35] has such confidence in john ratcliffe and the cia well china was trying to provide support to venezuela [4:41] during a u.s pressure campaign but where were they when delta force went in and got nicholas maduro they [4:46] were nowhere to be found and frankly that's the same thing you saw in june with china and russia in iran [4:53] we struck iran china and russia did nothing they stood idly by that's a reminder that the united [4:57] states is still the world's dominant superpower our friends are very happy today our enemies are very [5:03] worried but the person running the country delcy rodriguez spoke yesterday with russia's top diplomat [5:10] they are in contact with russia the defense minister has deep deep ties to russia is there a u.s russia [5:16] agreement here because there has been speculation based on testimony to congress back in 2019 by one [5:22] of trump's top russia advisors fiona hill that russia has been floating a venezuela for uk uk ukraine deal [5:29] here for some time this is there any such deal no this was a u.s operation um that was designed to [5:36] remove nicholas maduro because he was a u.s indicted drug trafficker and you don't get immunity from [5:42] american justice when you're indicted by our courts just because you're the illegitimate communist [5:46] dictator of another country and but to be clear that's not what i'm saying here is there an implication [5:52] that if russia doesn't meddle in america's backyard south america the united states will do something [5:57] less in ukraine which russia calls its backyard no there's no such implication and obviously russia [6:02] doesn't need any kind of pretext to do so it's invaded ukraine twice over the last 11 years [6:07] there's no such implication here at all and this is the operation the united states conducted [6:12] on our own without any coordination or cooperation from other countries to advance our national interest [6:19] which is to stop the drug trafficking and stop fenezuela from cooperating with countries like russia [6:24] and china and cuba and iran the president said saturday that a second wave military attack had [6:31] been planned it wasn't necessary but it could still be carried out what would necessitate it and what [6:37] would you support well what i took the president to mean is that uh what we just did with nicholas [6:43] maduro could be done again to other venezuelan leaders several of them are indicted in u.s courts [6:48] they're sanctioned by the united states and canada and european union and other nations [6:53] and if they continue down the path that maduro took the took the nation of venezuela then we [6:57] could conduct the same kind of operation as him i took that as the president urging them to [7:01] change their ways or face the same consequences and would you support a stabilization force [7:07] what u.s boots on the ground as the president said he wouldn't rule out we already had boots on the [7:13] ground as nicholas maduro learned the hard way it's always uh the president's option to [7:18] use the american military to protect american citizens and interests and obviously we have many [7:23] american citizens inside of venezuela and we have many interests and property as well i don't think the [7:28] president stabilization forces but i don't think he he i don't think he plans to do that i think we've seen [7:33] two the president the president's way of war over the last or over five years in office if you look [7:38] at four major operations the killing of the isis leader in syria the drone strike against the iranian [7:45] terrorist mastermind in iraq the strike against iran's nuclear facilities and now this capture of [7:51] nicholas maduro when our vital national interests are implicated the president takes bold audacious direct [7:57] action he accomplishes the mission and then the mission is over in some ways this is the greatest [8:03] mission of them all i mean as impressive as our military was in iran in june or in its first term [8:09] in iraq and syria against those terrorist masterminds uh it's probably harder to capture someone and get [8:15] out with no american loss of life than it is to kill a target or to blow up nuclear facilities so you are [8:22] drawing a distinction there in terms of authorities and use of the military the war powers act requires [8:28] the president to notify congress of the reason for committing troops within 48 hours of their [8:31] deployment and requires they be removed within 60 to 90 days unless congress authorizes it [8:39] uk with this open-ended commitment to keep forces as they are well i think he has removed the troops [8:44] they're only there for a couple hours to nab nicholas you're talking about the delta force operators who are [8:49] on the ground but there is a significant military build-up all around south america right now yes [8:55] you're comfortable with that no i strongly support it i mean part of part of that that deployment [9:01] was to collect intelligence to conduct this operation to quarantine the oil trade that venezuela [9:06] was sending to cuba or sending to our adversaries but it's not mission accomplished um it won't we [9:12] won't have accomplished our mission until venezuela starts acting like a normal nation it stops the [9:16] drug trafficking and human trafficking it kicks out islamic radicals and iranians and cubans and helps [9:22] the united states build a more stable prosperous western hemisphere that's the ultimate goal and [9:27] that's what president trump laid out yesterday so last month the chief of staff to the president [9:31] susie wiles told vanity fair that attacking targets on venezuela's mainland sovereign territory [9:37] would force trump to get congressional approval quote if he were to authorize some activity on land [9:43] then it's war then we'd need congress you are a co-equal branch of government why doesn't the [9:49] president need you or your authority or your consultation well i consult routinely with the [9:54] president and his senior advisors and you personally sure like yeah well as the chairman of the [9:59] intelligence as the chairman of the intelligence committee they keep me apprised of what their plans [10:04] are and uh what's going on i mean i spoke in the last 24 hours not just with the president but with his [10:09] senior team every man that was on that stage with him yesterday marco rubio john ratcliffe pete hexeth [10:15] dan kane stephen miller the core architect of the president's policy here i've spoken with every [10:20] single one of them the last 24 hours congress has acted to provide the president the resources and [10:27] authority that he needs to protect the vital interest of the united states whether it's taking out this [10:31] drug trafficker nicholas maduro who had contributed to the deaths of hundreds of arkansans and hundreds of [10:37] thousands of americans are striking iran's nuclear facilities he has the inherent authority under our [10:42] constitution to protect these american national interests and as the chief law enforcement officer [10:46] to make sure that indicted drug traffickers face justice whether they're indicted in venezuela [10:50] or indicted in the united states but by his own admission the dea administrator said that [10:55] cocaine prices have gone up nearly 45 percent drug traffickers have only changed routes venezuela is [11:01] not a fentanyl producer not a cocaine producer do you really think that this has ended [11:06] the drug problem venezuela is unique in latin america though because the maduro regime [11:11] is itself in league with the drug trafficking cartels it doesn't just tolerate them or it doesn't [11:16] just fail to control its territory it is in league and profits from drug trafficking cartels that's the [11:21] distinction between venezuela and other nations senator cotton thank you for your time today thank you [11:27] margaret we turn now to connecticut congressman jim himes he is the top democrat on the house intelligence [11:31] committee and he joins us this morning from greenwich congressman himes you are part of that [11:36] gang of eight which means that information about these secret operations is statutorily intended to [11:43] be shared with you as part of this very small group given that and what you should know can you clearly [11:53] explain what the united states is doing yeah by the way i was delighted to hear that tom cotton chairman [12:02] of the senate intelligence committee has been in regular contact with the administration i've had [12:05] zero outreach and no democrat that i'm aware of has had any outreach whatsoever so apparently we're [12:10] now in a world where the legal obligation to keep the congress informed only applies to uh to your [12:15] party which is really something but yeah no look i know exactly where we are margaret we're in the [12:19] euphoria period of uh acknowledging across the board that maduro was a bad guy and that our military is [12:25] absolutely incredible this is exactly the euphoria we felt in 2002 when our military took down [12:31] the taliban in afghanistan in 2003 when our military took out saddam hussein and in 2011 when we helped [12:36] remove muammar qaddafi from power in libya these were very very bad people by the way much much worse [12:42] than maduro and venezuela which was never a significant national security threat to the united [12:48] states but we're in that euphoria phase and what we learned the day after the euphoria phase that it's [12:53] an awful lot easier to break a country than it is to actually do what the president promised to do [12:58] which is to run it um and so again let's let let's let my republican colleagues enjoy their day of [13:05] euphoria but they're going to wake up tomorrow morning knowing what my god there is no plan here [13:09] any more than there was in afghanistan iraq or in libya well you heard the secretary of state say well [13:14] this is not the middle east there are conflicting statements from cabinet members uh hegseth told cbs you [13:21] know the president of the united states will absolutely be in charge here and leaned into the idea of military [13:27] options president trump said there will be an option of boots on the ground secretary rubio though [13:33] really just leaned into an oil quarantine here what what exactly is the point of leverage here [13:44] when do you expect to get answers do your republican colleagues promise you that they will get some of [13:50] these answers to the questions you have of course not margaret i mean look you're seeing it on television [13:56] today right two-thirds of my republics pick up every single morning and the only question they [14:01] have is what can i do to prove my loyalty to the president today and we see this because the president [14:07] has completely shifted who he was i mean as i watched that news conference yesterday i thought oh my god [14:13] this is dick cheney and the neocons not only are they taking out a uh they're doing a regime change [14:19] in a country by the way not a tier one threat to the united states but that they just don't like [14:23] they're warning the other dictators this is dick cheney in 2002 saying we're taking down saddam hussein [14:29] and by the way syria and iran better watch out and the fascinating thing about that and why it's [14:34] really hard to answer the question of where the hell they're going to go from here is that the [14:37] president won by promising maga and his own people um that this kind of stuff was done that the neocons [14:44] were over and here we are that was dick cheney in the conference yesterday you know deciding that the [14:50] united states was going to you know militarily change regimes and threaten other ones just because [14:54] we don't like them well but then the secretary of state was talking about working with the regime [15:02] and working with maduro's number two who's now running the place and other indicted criminals [15:09] according to the southern district of new york who are continuing to run venezuela so can you really [15:14] say that's regime change if they're working with the regime as you pointed out it's not right and [15:22] um you know lost to explain any consistency here i mean as you pointed out it was a very bad guy in [15:29] an indicted truck five weeks ago the pardoned bad and indicted truck drug trap these guys get a part [15:38] of them get the full can milk like them uh new york i i in that there is no maybe maybe believes [15:49] that work with the but i mean look again go back to it and it is congressman hives i'm i'm sorry to [15:57] cut you off here i'm having a terrible time uh audio wise i'm going to take a break because [16:02] hopefully our technicians can fix it in those two minutes so please stay with us we'll be right back [16:07] welcome back to face the nation just want to apologize to our viewers there uh congressman [16:12] himes did not have a bad case of the hiccups we have technical problems that's why he was getting [16:16] interrupted there it's called live view that's the technology being used and it wasn't working so [16:21] apologies for cutting that short you're back with me now in studio and we're going to talk to [16:26] maryland democratic senator chris van holland who is here in person good to be with you [16:32] will not have those problems we hope um but let's pick up on that very same point that we were [16:38] discussing with congressman himes there he says that no information was being shared with the top [16:46] people who have oversight like himself um what leverage do democrats have to force the [16:54] administration to treat congress as a co-equal branch of government well margaret it's hard when [17:00] the republicans in congress are totally awol right when they want to give donald trump essentially a [17:06] blank check because they continue to have majorities of course in the house and the senate uh obviously in [17:13] 2026 if democrats regain control of either house we will have the gavel but in the meantime we need to [17:20] go directly to the american people and just make it very clear that in this case it's my view that the [17:27] trump administration's been lying to the american people this has never been about stopping drugs [17:32] from coming to the united states we all support stopping drugs this from the beginning has been [17:37] about getting rid of maduro grabbing venezuela's oil for american oil companies and trump's billionaire [17:44] buddies that's what this is about that's why donald trump spent so much time yesterday talking about [17:50] oil 20 times the word oil was used in those remarks the defense secretary spoke to my colleague uh [17:56] tony de copel and used the word oil about six times um there is a lot of focus on those natural [18:02] resources but arguably isn't that what china russia iran others are are also trying to do which is to [18:10] extract their own benefit from this country you know what what is the counter to that point that [18:15] the administration would argue well the counter is you don't invade a country to grab their [18:21] natural resources right do you consider this an invasion even though although it's unclear because [18:26] well let's put it this way said there were boots on the ground and that there aren't well they took [18:29] they had boots on the ground right they took they took out the leader um and now they're demanding [18:36] access to venezuela's oil that's what this has been about i mean donald trump you know claimed that [18:43] he'd been against the war in iraq from the beginning that wasn't true but what we do know is he said [18:48] well having gone into iraq we should have gotten their oil this is what drives donald trump and [18:55] our servicemen and women perform magnificently but i think it's outrageous that the president [19:00] united states puts american lives at risk so big american oil companies and his billionaire buddies [19:06] can profit but arguably there are also uh critical minerals there there are all sorts of natural [19:12] resources in venezuela that the drug cartels even were getting in the business of that the chinese [19:17] were there trying to get um how do you do both things both corner the market on things that are [19:23] of vital national security interests those kind of minerals and still actually maintain the principles [19:29] that you're arguing should be upheld well the united states is working and under the previous [19:34] administration also worked to secure you know critical mineral supply chains unfortunately in many [19:40] of these areas the trump administration actually has surrendered uh to china i mean if you look at for [19:47] example clean energy and all those issues and and batteries we've essentially surrendered that [19:54] market to china what you don't do margaret is you don't put american lives at risk to go in and grab [20:03] oil resources to benefit the billionaires that support donald trump so chevron an american oil company [20:10] has been operating in venezuela throughout and they told cbs yesterday that they continue to to work [20:16] there my understanding is there are hundreds of americans working and living in venezuela still [20:21] reportedly there are at least four who have been detained by the regime the regime that remains in [20:27] power here you are on senate foreign relations what do you know about the detained americans [20:33] what can you find out about how they're doing i've not gotten an update uh from the administration [20:39] on those detained americans months ago i did work to secure the release of an american a marylander who [20:46] we now have back in baltimore maryland i think the administration is looking at those detentions [20:52] currently ongoing in venezuela and determining how many of them are wrongful detentions how many that [20:57] they don't think are wrongful detentions but certainly my view is we should work to bring back every [21:03] american who is wrongfully detained overseas i think this is going to complicate uh that effort [21:10] what the trump administration uh just did because they could designate venezuela as a state sponsor of [21:17] hostage shaking now is that where you're going with that no my my view is that the administration should [21:23] designate as wrongfully detained any americans that the you know venezuelan government has seized [21:30] wrongfully and then there are ways to continue to put pressure on now normally that pressure would [21:34] be through sanctions here the administration obviously has you know taken military action [21:40] as you've been pointing out we're still left with the regime i mean the vice president's part [21:45] of the regime donald trump says he's running venezuela um this is not going to end well iraq did not [21:54] end well other efforts to try to get rid of bad people and we're glad to get rid of maduro i'd like to [21:59] get rid of leaders in other countries but you don't do it through force that just doesn't work out [22:06] well in in our experience right and even on that point the secretary of state rubio challenged me [22:12] and saying we couldn't grab all those people at once but uh attorney general former attorney general bill [22:18] barr was on fox news this morning the man who put together that first indictment of maduro and he said [22:23] the intention was to clean the place out of this criminal organization so there's going to have to be [22:28] follow-up action to be clear do you oppose all snatch and grab operations of indicted people well i [22:35] don't think we should be putting american men and women at risk in a situation like this i mean i'd have [22:42] to look at every situation but again the motivation here is about grabbing venezuela's oil for american [22:50] oil companies you already see folks on wall street lining up so let's just be real as to what is really [22:56] behind this operation i mean donald trump said he was going to focus on the united states we have [23:01] people's health care costs going through the roof because they refuse to extend the affordable care [23:06] tax credits meanwhile he bails out argentina and wants to run venezuela for the benefit of american [23:13] oil companies we're going to have to talk about all the things you just raised as we um in a future [23:19] episode of face the nation but clearly on the question of war powers does the president have the legal [23:25] authority to do what he's doing no he does not i mean this is on the appropriations committee you've [23:30] got power what can you do about it well i i worked with senator berkeley already to offer a resolution in [23:37] the united states senate to cut off any u.s taxpayer dollars to fund an attack against venezuela republicans [23:46] blocked us from doing it so yes we will continue to push in fact i'm sure we're gonna have a vote on a [23:50] war powers resolution probably as early as this week if not next um last time we offered those [23:57] margaret republicans voted no all but one or two senator paul voted with us maybe one other but for [24:04] the most part republicans are happy to give donald trump a blank check and surrender their constitutional [24:10] responsibilities to donald trump senator van holland uh a lot more to talk to you about um thank you very [24:16] much for joining us here thank you to leave it there we turn now um back to our conversation with [24:23] connecticut democratic congressman jim himes who i think can be heard now congressman um i'm glad we [24:29] got the the link back up um for those viewers who who who lost you there um can you explain to us [24:39] the administration is arguing that what they did uh is legal and that the snatch and grab operation [24:46] of taking an indicted criminal nicolas maduro to the united states through military force has [24:53] precedent and they point back to to what happened in the late 80s with noriega in panama what's your [25:00] challenge to that yeah well um first it's clearly illegal under international law right no full stop [25:08] u.n charter no question there now you may not care about international law but if you don't care about [25:12] international law remember you're going to be making an appeal to international law to try to get [25:16] restitution for the seizure of chevron's oil stuff so maybe you want to rethink how much disdain you show [25:23] for international law uh clearly not legal under the constitution because though presidents of both [25:28] parties have argued against this the constitution is really pretty clear that the representatives of [25:33] the people get to be consulted and ultimately approve military activity that has not happened here [25:39] at all um and so um again there's nothing legal uh about this and more to the point um again under [25:48] the international law point think of what russia and china just learned russia and china just learned [25:53] that all you need to do if you want to go into estonia is to say that the leader of estonia is a bad [25:58] person you don't even need to make a particularly good case look there's no national security expert [26:03] saying that venezuela was a mortal threat to the united states three weeks ago so what china and russia just [26:08] learned is that the beacon of liberty and rule of law in the world has now green-lighted snatch and [26:13] grab operations in estonia in taiwan wherever xi and putin decide they want to go next so i take your [26:22] point on the precedent there um do you think that china or russia would have the ability to carry out [26:29] that kind of lightning operation the united states did well um no uh but that doesn't mean well china yes [26:39] china yes china very soon and you know their leader has said we will develop this capability [26:44] we know that their intent is to do precisely this in taiwan russia is a more complicated case it's [26:49] you know russia loses 10 000 people to get in you know three acres of land in eastern ukraine but that [26:54] may not be true five years from now and by the way back to the noriega case because you do ask a good [26:58] question there panama is a terrible precedent why do i say that because when we went into panama uh the [27:05] panamanian congress had declared war on the united states of america right they had killed a united [27:11] states marine and wounded two others and the congress had been consultant the congress under in the noriega [27:20] mission had had authorized regime change so it's a terrible precedent that the [27:26] administration is using to say that this is legal yeah as we understand it because we looked this up [27:31] noriega claimed head of state immunity and the court said that that immunity was meant to protect [27:37] official state functions and private profiting off the drug trade basically the courts ruled on his [27:41] actions as a leader and not on the legality of the snatch and grab operation itself um so we're [27:48] going to continue to to track all of this thank you uh congressman himes thank you senator van holland [27:54] we will be right back that's it for us today and there has been a lot of breaking news thank you for [28:01] watching be sure to tune in monday night and every weekday night for the cbs evening news as tony de [28:07] copel begins a new generation here at cbs news until next week for face the nation i'm margaret brennan

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →