Try Free

Bill Gates set to testify before Epstein committee today

MS NOW June 10, 2026 6m 1,015 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Bill Gates set to testify before Epstein committee today from MS NOW, published June 10, 2026. The transcript contains 1,015 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Jeffrey Epstein's longtime assistant, Leslie Groff, denied any knowledge of her former boss's crimes during a transcribed interview with House Oversight lawmakers. Groff, who worked for the late sex offender for nearly 20 years until he was arrested on sex trafficking charges, testified before the..."

[0:00] Jeffrey Epstein's longtime assistant, Leslie Groff, denied any knowledge of her former boss's crimes [0:05] during a transcribed interview with House Oversight lawmakers. Groff, who worked for the late sex [0:10] offender for nearly 20 years until he was arrested on sex trafficking charges, testified before the [0:17] committee yesterday and said she, quote, never saw anything improper. She went on to say that [0:23] she wasn't aware that some of the women that she arranged to massage Epstein were minors. [0:29] Her name appears more than 160,000 times in the files released by the Justice Department. [0:37] Meanwhile, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates will testify before the committee today. [0:42] The billionaire is among a number of high-profile individuals shown in photos with Epstein released [0:47] last year. And reports say that former chief investigations counsel for the committee, [0:52] Jake Greenberg, has been helping Gates prepare for his interview. The arrangement is not uncommon, [0:58] but it sparked concerns among some ethics experts over the optics. Joining us now is Democratic [1:06] Congressman James Walkinshaw of Virginia. He's a member of the House Oversight Committee. [1:11] Congressman, thanks for coming to the table this morning. You interviewed Leslie Groff yesterday. [1:15] You were at the table. What were your biggest takeaways? And are Groff's claims that she was [1:22] not aware of anything over the course of 20 years, including personally arranging some of his massages [1:28] with minors? Are those believable? I didn't find her claims believable. 18 years as Epstein's assistant, [1:35] before and after his 2008 guilty plea for soliciting prostitution from a minor. So your boss pleads guilty [1:45] to a sex crime is a registered sex offender. And then for 10 years after that, you schedule massage [1:51] after massage after massage, meeting after meeting after meeting with young women. And you never have [1:58] a suspicion about what might be going on there. And in some of those emails to schedule those meetings [2:06] or massages, the young women or girls are telling Ms. Groff that they have an orchestra class or they have [2:15] school. Now, maybe an adult could have an orchestra class or a college course, perhaps. But it might [2:22] raise some suspicions for a normal person. What was her response to those follow-ups? [2:26] Her response was she never, she trusted Epstein. She felt like he had reformed after the 2008 [2:34] conviction and that she had no reason to believe that anyone was underage or that there was any [2:41] sexual abuse taking place. If she was ignorant of what was taking place, she was very, very willfully [2:49] ignorant of it. I don't buy her story. What do you expect to hear today from billionaire [2:54] Bill Gates when he arrives before the panel? I expect he'll be consistent with what he said publicly, [3:00] which is that his relationship with Epstein was limited. Epstein was hoping that he would set up [3:06] a donor-advised fund. He hoped that Epstein would recruit others for the Gates Foundation philanthropic [3:13] work. I think we're going to be asking tough questions about the nature and extent of that [3:18] relationship. There are some strange elements to it where Epstein learns of this affair Gates has with [3:24] the Russian woman and clearly tries to use that as leverage over Gates. Epstein begins to make [3:33] payments to the woman and then ask Gates for reimbursement of those payments. This is in the [3:38] files. We don't know how Gates responded to that request from Epstein. So there are, I think, [3:43] some really important questions we're going to need to ask today. And then committee chairman James [3:48] Comer has said that he doesn't believe that Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general whom his former [3:54] boss Pam Bondi has said is responsible for the extremely messy and inadequate release of the [4:00] Epstein files doesn't need to become, to come before Congress and your committee to answer any [4:06] questions about that, especially in the midst of his appointment to permanent attorney general. [4:12] When I heard chairman Comer say that yesterday, I thought he must have [4:16] caught this Trump syndrome and maybe he fell asleep during our interview with Pam Bondi [4:20] because when Democrats asked Pam Bondi questions, her response was, you should talk to Todd Blanche. [4:26] When Republicans asked Pam Bondi questions, her response was, you should talk to Todd Blanche. [4:30] He knows the answers to these questions. So for chairman Comer to have forgotten about that [4:37] is kind of astounding to me. Quite frankly, I see it as part of this Trump administration coverup. [4:42] Anytime this investigation gets close to someone who's still in the Trump administration, [4:47] remember Pam Bondi came in after she got fired by Trump. Bill Barr came in after he was no longer [4:54] in the Trump administration. Chairman Comer is unwilling to really take on the Trump administration [4:59] on behalf of the survivors who are demanding accountability and transparency. [5:03] Any other key takeaways from that conversation with Pam Bondi about her role? [5:08] You know, I think the key element of her role as she explained it to us was ignorance. [5:17] She didn't seem to know the details. We asked her some tough questions about the July 2025 memo where [5:24] essentially the Department of Justice said case closed, nothing to see her here. She evaded [5:30] questions about whether FBI personnel reviewing the files were instructed to flag mentions of Donald [5:38] Trump, which has been widely reported. Whistleblowers have shared it with Congress. She evaded those [5:45] questions clear. She didn't want to answer that. It's quite clear to me that that happened. We know [5:50] based on reporting that she went to Donald Trump and said, Mr. President, you need to know you're in the [5:55] files many, many times. How did that process play out? I'd like to ask Todd Blanch those questions as well. [6:00] Yeah. Figuring out also Donald Trump's role and whether or not any of these directives came directly [6:07] from him is something that I'll be very interested to find out about that. I'm sure Todd Blanch will be [6:11] asked about by, hopefully, your Democratic colleagues in the Senate. But Democratic [6:15] Congressman James Watkinshaw of Virginia, thank you so much for joining us this morning.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →