New Trump Press Sec. F**KS UP on Fox News

[0:00] Donald Trump has recently announced his official new press secretary, and unfortunately for Scott [0:05] Jennings, it is not Scott Jennings. The lady taking Carolyn Levitt's place is named Katie [0:11] Zachariah, and she is about as MAGA as it gets. She made her debut appearance on Fox News just [0:21] this morning and made a terrible sales pitch to the American people, not just begging them to [0:26] give Trump credit for, I don't know what, but demanding that they give him credit. You need [0:32] to start giving God Emperor Trump credit, and we have to talk about this unhinged interview. [0:38] But before we do, if you end up liking this video and you want to support the channel, [0:41] please be sure to hit the like, subscribe, and notification bells before you go. [0:45] As Mediate notes, quote, people need to start giving him credit. Trump's new White House press [0:50] secretary casts doubt on his low polling even before she officially starts the gig. Katie [0:56] Zachariah hit the ground running on Saturday, casting doubt on Donald Trump's low polling and [1:01] telling Republicans they need to, quote, step up more. And she doesn't even officially start as [1:05] White House press secretary until Monday. Zachariah joined Fox and Friends weekend following the [1:11] announcement that she'd be stepping into the White House role previously filled by Caroline Levitt. [1:16] Zachariah is a senior advisor with Trump Media, and she had a brief stint with the Department of [1:19] Homeland Security earlier this year. So I'll also point out, by the way, she told Jesse Waters, [1:27] quote, I'm looking forward to, quote, working more with you. Again, basically just ripping the [1:32] Band-Aid off and revealing to the American people that there is an incestuous relationship with the [1:37] Trump administration and Fox News. They're basically two limbs on the same body. But I digress. [1:44] Let's start with these clips of Katie Zachariah on Fox News, and let's see if she's got the stuff to [1:48] replace Carolyn Levitt. And though there are frustrations with some, President Trump has [1:54] never been unambiguous. He is an American first, America first president. He is putting America [1:59] at interest first, American citizens first with this deal. And we will have cheaper gas, [2:04] cheaper groceries with this diesel deal. You know, Katie, it's really interesting, [2:08] the criticism. He's getting it from the left. He's getting it from the right. He's getting it from [2:12] that ingrate Zelensky, who keeps blowing up refineries and making things more complicated [2:19] for the president ahead of the. So funny. Rachel Campos Duffy would not have been calling [2:23] Zelensky an ingrate during the Biden years and certainly not during the first year of the war. [2:28] Zelensky is blowing up Russian refineries and oil because it's an act of self-defense. He did not [2:33] start this war. Russia invaded Ukraine, and he's desperate to try to get Russia to back off. But [2:39] Rachel Campos Duffy doesn't give a damn about that because she's worried that Zelensky engaging [2:45] in self-defense will materially harm the Republicans in the upcoming midterms, a fear that Trump himself [2:51] also has. And so she's just like, basically, no, you just need to let Russia run roughshod and conquer [2:56] your country if the alternative is doing things which may or may not impact the midterms. I do appreciate [3:04] her calling out the fact that this is getting criticism from the left and the right, because even some [3:09] conservatives have acknowledged this is, you know, potentially an impeachable offense and potentially [3:13] violative of federal law and also just really despicable on its face. But I digress. Let's [3:20] continue. What the people on the left and right are worried about and Zelensky too, these are people [3:26] who want war, who say a deal with Russia on diesel could possibly mean we might get an end to the [3:33] Ukraine war, which would be amazing. We could spend less money there. We could stop killing. I mean, [3:39] there has been a million kids killed on the Russian side, a million on the Ukraine side. [3:45] This could be good, not just for diesel prices, but if you care about peace and saving lives. [3:51] Yeah, I agree, Rachel. And listen, President Trump solved eight conflicts in under 12 months in his [3:57] first year. God bless him. [3:59] And he will ask. [4:00] So again, that's not true. It's been debunked to hell and back. He did not end [4:03] eight conflicts. There is no indication that this deal would somehow end at the Russia-Ukraine [4:09] war, unless you mean just giving Russia the permission structure to run roughshod over [4:13] Zelensky, Kiev and Ukraine. Maybe that's what you mean. But again, Rachel Campos stuff is incredibly [4:19] stupid. But worse, she's also really dishonest as even right wing Twitter notes because they slapped [4:25] this clip with a fact check community note. No evidence supports Ukraine killing, quote, [4:29] a million kids on Russia's side. U.N. has verified roughly 820 child deaths in total in Ukraine since [4:36] February 2022, most attributed to Russian attacks, not the reverse. So, yeah, just categorically [4:44] false. So let's go back to the clips and hear a bit more from the new press secretary. [4:50] Yeah, I agree, Rachel. And listen, President Trump solved eight conflicts in under 12 months in his [4:56] first year. God bless him. And he will absolutely bring an end to this under his term. And I am in full [5:03] agreement with you that this deal is not actually deleterious to bringing peace. In fact, it works [5:09] towards peace. And I believe he's showing that he's going to be able to work a deal here. I fully trust [5:13] him. He did it with Venezuela and he did it with the way he's doing it with Canada and he did it with [5:18] Greenland. So I think we're going to see some historic wins and President Trump is going to deliver [5:23] that. We just have to make sure we continue winning on these races. And going back to his rally in [5:29] Syracuse, I've never seen so much energy during the midterms. And during all of these races, I worked [5:35] in the 06 midterms, which we did lose. And I have never seen a president ever work this hard for [5:42] midterm races. [5:43] No, that was embarrassing. OK, she's basically having a stroke here on. You know, I just I think that [5:49] he definitely not not deleterious at all. I think that it good he do this. And and I listen, [6:03] take it from me. We got we need win more races and and definitely white race. Definitely. I [6:12] imagine she'd say something like that. What else? Oh, and I worked the I worked 06. I mean, [6:18] we lost that one. But I and that's the one that that everyone compares this one to. [6:26] But I'm sure it'll be it'll it'll it it will be different. That's not a great start. So again, [6:34] right now, listen, hater as much as you do. And I totally understand it. She was awful as a human [6:40] being. But Carolyn Levitt was a much more capable speaker than this. But let's see another clip. [6:47] How good do you feel right now that in the next four weeks, you all will be able to make [6:54] your case to the American people? Well, President Trump has made the case and [7:00] delivered historic results. I would have loved to see more from our congressional Republicans [7:04] and Senate. I think President Trump has done everything in his power to do that. Look, [7:09] I believe I don't know how much I believe all of the polling numbers. Yeah, I look across the [7:14] spectrum on all these races. And even if you just touched down in Michigan with Mike Rogers and El [7:19] Said, El Said has come out just for a little example, on no topics for Michiganders. He is talking [7:26] all DSA talking points. He's not talking about the auto industry jobs, anything that actually matters [7:31] to someone in Michigan. He's not part of DSA, not a member of DSA. He's not endorsed by the DSA. He has [7:39] no relationship with the DSA. He's certainly a progressive, but he talks about health care costs. [7:44] He talks about civil liberties. He talks about the economy. That came up quite a bit during [7:48] the debate. So, I mean, Katie Zachariah, she's obviously a liar on par with Carolyn Levitt. [7:55] Like her ability, I mean, her predilection towards lying is obviously there. Does she have the ability [8:01] to persuasively and cogently lie? That remains to be seen. So far, it's not looking good. [8:07] And Mike Rogers is offering solution. And President Trump has come out behind these candidates [8:12] and said, I'm going to support them. I'm going to support the America First candidates [8:15] and those who are going to deliver results. And so that is going to, I hope, be effectuated [8:20] by the time the election rolls around in November. But President Trump, not only do we have Russia, [8:25] but he also went to the G7 and negotiated that. So people need to start giving him credit for his [8:31] multifaceted approach and how he's trying to bring down prices almost unilaterally all by [8:37] himself. I mean, those Foxos don't seem impressed. Number one, almost like stunned at the train wreck [8:43] here. Number one and number two, again, not particularly cogent. And number three, [8:48] just ordering people to give him credit. You need to give him credit. Losers. James Singer notes, [8:54] woof, White House midterms closing argument. The election is a referendum on Trump. Well, [8:59] yeah, it is. Prices aren't higher. They are. Whine about Trump not getting credit. Yes, [9:04] for the high prices, corruption and war lie because Trump is watching, of course. And I will also point [9:09] out that ever since she was announced, I mean, there's been a bunch of investigative reports. [9:14] And right now, the Bulwark has a really good one going into the unhinged, deleted tweets of Katie [9:20] Zachariah. So, for example, in 2025, she called for Stephen Miller and the Trump administration to [9:26] suspend habeas corpus, which is the right of people to know why they're being arrested. [9:30] Uh, she also says, um, uh, that the federal government under Trump should take over California. [9:37] So it should basically overthrow the Californian government, uh, overthrow Governor Newsom and [9:41] just seize direct control. Um, also advocating for Trump to run for a third term. So she's a [9:49] lunatic and a liar, at least on par with Carolyn Levitt in that respect. But so far, she's just a [9:54] really, really bad communicator, unlike Carolyn Levitt. And apparently another deleted tweet, [10:00] 2026 midterms will be a bloodbath if we don't shift course now. So as much as she's trying to [10:05] hype up the midterms, maybe that's why she couldn't make the case persuasively because [10:09] she knows deep down, uh, it's not going to go well for the GOP based on the data. And now [10:14] she has to lie and pretend that she thinks it does. In the meantime, let me know what you think [10:19] in the comments.