About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Mark Kelly questions ‘not reasonable’ military funding requests for war with Iran: Full interview from NBC News, published July 27, 2026. The transcript contains 1,952 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"And joining me now is Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. Senator Kelly, welcome back to Meet the Press. Good to be on. Thank you, Kristen. Thank you so much for joining us. I do want to start where I left off with Ambassador Mike Waltz on Iran, of course. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said..."
[0:00] And joining me now is Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona.
[0:03] Senator Kelly, welcome back to Meet the Press.
[0:08] Good to be on. Thank you, Kristen.
[0:10] Thank you so much for joining us.
[0:12] I do want to start where I left off with Ambassador Mike Waltz on Iran, of course.
[0:17] Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that the U.S. is still open to a diplomatic resolution to the war.
[0:24] He also described the president's approach as, quote, a head for an eye.
[0:30] As someone who has flown combat missions during the Gulf War, Senator, do you think that's the right approach?
[0:36] Well, I think these guys are flailing, and this thing is completely stuck because this president got into this without a strategic goal,
[0:47] despite what Mike Waltz said about that they had a strategic aim in mind.
[0:53] At first, remember, Kristen, this was about regime change.
[0:56] Then it became about nuclear weapons, then about ballistic missiles, then about the Navy.
[0:59] They are flailing here.
[1:03] And, I mean, the head for the eye thing, I mean, this is – you hear this stuff out of the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth,
[1:10] running around on a stage about maximal lethality and killing people and setting records with the number of targets hit.
[1:17] I mean, when you were talking to him about munitions, of course we've used a lot of munitions.
[1:22] We hit a lot of targets, 14,000, as of the last time I heard Pete Hegseth talk about this.
[1:29] So this thing has been a disaster, and it's been a disaster for the American people.
[1:33] In a time when they couldn't afford their lives, this president gets us into this war,
[1:39] and costs then continue to skyrocket.
[1:43] The price of gas, $4.50 a gallon here in Arizona, over $4 a gallon across the country.
[1:50] People can't afford groceries and rent.
[1:53] I mean, this thing has been a disaster, and they do not know what to do.
[1:57] Senator Kelly, I want to drill down with you on that point about munitions.
[2:02] Let me read you some of NBC's exclusive reporting.
[2:04] U.S. military commanders have been picking and choosing which Iranian missiles to intercept
[2:10] amid an effort to preserve the Pentagon's diminishing supply of weapons.
[2:16] What is your response to that report?
[2:23] Well, it's pretty obvious to people.
[2:25] Well, when you're in a conflict now for five months and you're flying, in some cases,
[2:30] hundreds of sorties a day, attacking targets just to drive the numbers up.
[2:38] I mean, Pete Hegseth talked about this a lot.
[2:40] And by the way, the guy doesn't know what he's doing.
[2:43] He's incompetent.
[2:44] He should have never had this job, and he should be fired.
[2:47] But they were all about the numbers.
[2:50] You know, a conflict that, you know, he was talking about setting records,
[2:53] going over 10,000 targets, 12,000, 14,000.
[2:57] Most of those targets are hit with multiple weapons.
[3:02] So, of course, I mean, we've expended tens of thousands of weapons.
[3:06] And it takes, as Pete Hegseth said in the committee hearing, when I asked him this question,
[3:11] it's going to take years to replenish these.
[3:13] This is by their own making.
[3:15] They're not keeping track.
[3:17] They're, they, at this point, this president and the people around him are incompetent.
[3:23] Given the dwindling munitions which you're referencing,
[3:28] Secretary Hegseth, as you well know, asked for an additional $67 billion more for the war with Iran.
[3:36] He said it's necessary to sustain military readiness.
[3:40] Will you vote to approve that $67 billion, Senator?
[3:44] Do you see that as necessary?
[3:45] Kristen, they're also asking for $1.5 trillion for the defense budget this year and a supplemental.
[3:54] When I got to the Senate just five and a half years ago, the defense budget was $740 billion.
[4:01] It's more than doubled in five and a half years.
[4:03] We're now approaching numbers of, like, what the rest of the world combines spends on defense.
[4:10] I mean, do we really feel that we're that threatened and we need to spend these sums of money for our defense?
[4:19] We've got programs that this administration is going to spend money on that aren't going to work and things that we don't need.
[4:27] If we had some competent people running this department, you could figure out, how do you defend our nation in a way and give the troops what they need within a reasonable budget?
[4:39] What they're asking for is not reasonable.
[4:40] So just to be very clear, are you a no on approving that $67 billion?
[4:46] You won't approve it?
[4:46] Hey, I haven't made a final decision yet, you know, on that specific vote, right?
[4:56] But as I said, they're asking for $1.5 trillion.
[5:00] This war was a mistake.
[5:01] He got into this without a strategic goal.
[5:04] He got into this without thinking about the consequences to the American people and to our troops.
[5:09] We have 18 killed service members at this point.
[5:14] So I haven't made a final decision on how I'm going to vote on that.
[5:17] But what the way they've managed this so far has been a disaster.
[5:22] Well, and of course, Iran is the backdrop to the midterm elections now just 100 days away.
[5:28] I do want to ask you about the midterms on Saturday.
[5:31] Democrats in Maine nominated Troy Jackson to replace scandal plagued Graham Plattner on the ballot.
[5:38] You said yourself, Senator, the path to winning back the Senate runs through Maine.
[5:43] Maine, do you think that Troy Jackson is the strongest person to unseat Senator Susan Collins?
[5:51] I think he's a strong candidate.
[5:53] And I think we have an opportunity.
[5:54] And I think Senator Collins has backed this president on all his stuff, right?
[6:01] Every time it's mattered, and we could have used her vote to really put a check on this president,
[6:06] she stood with Donald Trump.
[6:07] I think we have an opportunity here.
[6:09] Maine's very important.
[6:10] We have other states, Ohio, Alaska, we have an opportunity, Texas, Iowa.
[6:16] Hey, even in South Carolina, you know, right now, Annie Andrews is running a great campaign.
[6:22] So we have an opportunity to win there as well.
[6:25] Florida.
[6:25] So the map, it's tough.
[6:28] We're going to have to work really hard.
[6:29] That's why I've been traveling across the country to all these states.
[6:33] And I'm going to continue to do that until November to make sure we have every opportunity to win back the Senate.
[6:39] Well, do you think your progressive colleagues, like Senator Bernie Sanders, for example,
[6:44] made a mistake by endorsing and standing by Graham Plattner for so long,
[6:50] despite scandal after scandal, given the importance of this seat that you just laid out?
[6:56] Well, it's pretty obvious that Graham Plattner wasn't vetted well enough.
[7:00] He was not the right person to do this.
[7:02] And he had a background, you know, that didn't allow him to continue in a race.
[7:06] But that doesn't matter at this point.
[7:08] You know, what matters is getting Troy Jackson the resources to run a good campaign and get him across the finish line.
[7:14] Okay, you'll be out on the trail with Troy Jackson.
[7:16] Can we expect to see you there in Maine with him?
[7:21] I don't have my entire schedule finished.
[7:24] Maine is not yet on my calendar.
[7:26] But I have every intention to work as hard as I can for the races that I think we can win.
[7:31] And that is one of them.
[7:32] I think we can win in Maine.
[7:33] We can win in Alaska, Ohio.
[7:36] So, yeah, I mean, I'm certainly going to consider it.
[7:38] All right.
[7:39] Well, I want to, speaking of the progressives in your party, ask you about one of the big conversations right now.
[7:44] This week, New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani put out a video where he again referred to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a war criminal and called for him to be arrested.
[7:55] Take a look.
[7:56] My administration has reviewed every avenue available under applicable law to determine whether New York City could execute the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant if Benjamin Netanyahu came here.
[8:07] It is clear that we do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant.
[8:12] The federal government, however, does.
[8:15] And I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant.
[8:19] Do you agree with Mayor Mamdani that Prime Minister Netanyahu is a war criminal who should be arrested by the federal government?
[8:25] Hey, I'm not happy with the decisions that the prime minister of Israel has made through over the last few years.
[8:37] The way they conducted the operations in Gaza, there were a lot of mistakes made.
[8:43] That being said, Israel is an ally of ours.
[8:47] We support the Israeli people.
[8:49] I'm going to always stand by Israel as a nation.
[8:51] They have an election coming up on October 27th.
[8:54] The best way to resolve this issue with a prime minister that, just like our president, is not doing the job they were hired to do is for him to be defeated at the ballot box.
[9:06] So that's coming up pretty soon here.
[9:09] You know, and I hope the Israeli people rally around a candidate that will take Israel in a better direction.
[9:14] Let me ask you a couple of other questions related to this one.
[9:19] This week, the DNC Rules Committee voted to make South Carolina, as you know, the first state to vote in the Democratic presidential primary in 2028.
[9:32] Do you believe that was the right move?
[9:34] Should South Carolina be the first state to vote in 2028?
[9:40] You know, I don't get a vote on this.
[9:42] This is for the DNC, the members of the DNC, to decide which state comes first.
[9:48] When you look at the five states they put up front, I think that represents the Democratic Party across the country.
[9:55] And, you know, South Carolina has always been, you know, a state that's been a critical component of this, not just the state.
[10:02] Congressman Jim Clyburn has been critical to this.
[10:06] We also have opportunities to win elections, not only the Senate race with Annie Andrews,
[10:11] but Nancy LaCour, who's a veteran, who has an opportunity here to win a critical House seat.
[10:19] So I'm not going to weigh in on, like, what the order should be because I don't get a vote there.
[10:26] But South Carolina has been always been an important part of the discussion.
[10:31] All right.
[10:31] Let me ask you about something you do have a vote in.
[10:34] Of course, a lot of buzz about whether you are going to run for president in 2028.
[10:39] This week, your wife, former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, was asked if you should run.
[10:43] She said, go for it.
[10:45] You've been very open that you're seriously considering it.
[10:48] Senator, what would get you to a yes that you will run in 2028?
[10:54] Yeah, I think we've got to see, you know, what are the issues that we're facing after we get on the other side of November here.
[11:00] It's really critical that Democrats win back the House and the Senate and put a check on a president who is so corrupt.
[11:08] There's there's nothing to compare him to.
[11:11] I mean, he spends most of his time trying to figure out how to enrich himself and his family members and his friends.
[11:17] It is corruption that we've never seen before.
[11:20] And it's hurting the American people.
[11:23] People can't afford their lives.
[11:25] So this is a discussion I'm going to continue to have with my family.
[11:28] But we've got plenty of time.
[11:30] All right, Senator Mark Kelly, thank you so very much for joining us.
[11:33] We really appreciate it.
[11:37] Thank you for having me on.