About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of ATTY. SISON NAPIKON KAY REP. LUISTRO, PANELO NAPABILIB! from Pilipinas Insider, published October 14, 2026. The transcript contains 696 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Yes, Your Honor, just a response to the counter manifestation of the lead prosecutor. In the first place, when the lead prosecutor mentioned that if the respondent wants to be heard, there are other platforms where we can show and present our evidence. I'm not sure if I heard that right. And to be..."
[0:00] Yes, Your Honor, just a response to the counter manifestation of the lead prosecutor.
[0:08] In the first place, when the lead prosecutor mentioned that if the respondent wants to be heard,
[0:14] there are other platforms where we can show and present our evidence.
[0:24] I'm not sure if I heard that right.
[0:27] And to be frank, it sounds, it is ridiculous to even suggest to the respondent that,
[0:35] Hey, after 38 days, present namin ang lahat ng mga tao na sa tingin namin ay kaya magbigay ng damage sa iyong reputasyon
[0:48] at kaya mag-identify ng mga dokumento na gusto namin marinig ng taong bayan.
[0:57] Pero ang gagawin namin sa bandang huli ay i-withdraw namin lahat ito.
[1:01] At sasabihin na lamang namin na ito ay para sa taong bayan para may kaunti namang kabilisan ang trial na ito.
[1:10] But nonetheless, may iba ka namang platform respondent.
[1:17] That is the messaging that the prosecution seems to want to impart before the public and before this honorable court.
[1:30] It is unbelievable.
[1:32] And to be honest, it is unacceptable.
[1:35] Platform for the respondent.
[1:37] Does the prosecution really want the respondent na puta lang ang respondent sa Facebook and where else?
[1:49] Matapos nilang sirain ang vicepresidente sa harap ng publiko.
[2:03] At ngayon ang sasabihin ay tutulungan ang taong bayan para mamadali ang proseso.
[2:09] Sa tingin ko, hindi natin kailangan ng higit pang patunay na something really, really wrong is going on here.
[2:24] Now, binanggit rin ng lead prosecutor yung 2025 impeachment complaint
[2:30] that the prosecution allegedly wants to help the public because, you know, they're interested
[2:37] because the impeachment complaints against the vicepresident have been going on since 2025.
[2:43] In fact, I will probably need to correct that because the impeachment campaign against the vicepresident
[2:47] did not only begin in 2025 when the Supreme Court junked and nullified void ab initio.
[2:55] So, the impeachment complaints filed, or the articles of impeachment, that the 19th House of Representatives filed.
[3:04] Baka nakakalimutan natin na itong dahilan kung bakit may disisyon ngayon na Duterte versus H.O.R.
[3:10] Kaya hindi ko rin alam kung saan ang gagaling yung sugestyon na iyan.
[3:14] But let us be clear.
[3:19] Whatever is the decision of the prosecution on how to manage its case or how to secure its case
[3:27] and whether it thinks that its case can survive on one article alone
[3:33] at hindi na nila kailangan pa ng ebidensya or to offer evidence on articles 1, the confidential funds,
[3:42] and article 4 on grave threats, at yung article 3 on bribery and corruption, that's their call.
[3:53] That's their lookout.
[3:55] And kagaya ng isang batayang prinsipyo sa lahat ng hukuman,
[4:04] the prosecution's case must stand or fall on its own.
[4:11] So, kung pahihinain ng pag-withdraw ng tatlong articles,
[4:16] ang kaso na ito ng prosecution, that's theirs to bear.
[4:21] That's their burden.
[4:23] That's not the defense burden.
[4:24] And the defense will proceed as it deems fit.
[4:31] Lalo na sa pagkakataong ito,
[4:33] naggumugol ang taong bayan ng 38 araw.
[4:41] Marahil marami sa kanilang hindi pa pumapasok sa kanilang,
[4:43] sa kanilang trabaho para masubaybayan.
[4:48] Ang paglilitis na ito,
[4:50] at hindi lang yun,
[4:52] gumugol tayo ng government resources para sa trial na ito.
[4:57] In fact, I would even go as far as say that
[5:01] the withdrawal should already be one of the reasons
[5:06] why the articles of impeachment,
[5:08] entire articles of impeachment should be dismissed.
[5:10] Isang pruweba, kahapon narinig natin,
[5:19] tinanong pa,
[5:21] yung daledge,
[5:23] forensic financial expert.
[5:28] At pingilit na,
[5:32] so saan mo ba may attribute ito?
[5:35] At ano binanggit niya?
[5:36] Confidential funds.
[5:37] And now, we hear today,
[5:39] the prosecution say,
[5:41] that they're withdrawing the articles
[5:43] and delegations
[5:45] doon sa confidential funds.
[5:47] So, yes,
[5:48] it goes into the very right of the respondent to do process.
[5:52] At kung ano man ang gagawin ng hukuman ito,
[5:56] sa paglilitis na ito,
[5:57] hindi lang respondent ang apektado dito.
[5:59] Dahil,
[6:00] ano man ang mangyari sa hukuman na ito,
[6:02] ito ang mensahe
[6:04] na ibinibigay natin sa taong bayan,
[6:06] ito ang ehemplo at modelo
[6:08] na sinasabi natin sa mamamayang Pilipino
[6:11] na pwede ito.
[6:13] Pwede itong gawin sa vicepresidente ninyo.
[6:16] Kaya pwede rin itong gawin
[6:17] sa kahit kanino sa inyo.
[6:20] Kapag kayo ang naharap sa isang pagsasakdal.
[6:24] Hindi ko namin papayagan yan.