About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of π¨ SECOND Karen Read/Reporter Transcript RELEASED! from Loophole Lawyer, published July 16, 2026. The transcript contains 2,624 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Even though she doesn't ever go over to the body, but she notices that the phone is under him. We can't speak, but there's something coming out. I approached the house from a direction that would not have necessitated a three-point turn, and they got screwed by that. And look at this. Higgy Bear's..."
[0:00] Even though she doesn't ever go over to the body, but she notices that the phone is under him.
[0:07] We can't speak, but there's something coming out.
[0:09] I approached the house from a direction that would not have necessitated a three-point turn, and they got screwed by that.
[0:17] And look at this. Higgy Bear's face is looking straight down.
[0:21] He can't even look to the right because John is right there.
[0:23] I don't think we're going to have time, Alan. We have to have everything filed by tomorrow.
[0:27] Because if he turns his head just a little to the right, he would make eye contact with John.
[0:31] Something is up between these two, obviously.
[0:34] That definitely is true. Now, let's look to see if Karen's actually doing the shot.
[0:41] He normally does Dateline, so he's doing our Dateline piece.
[0:46] Oh, you are doing Dateline?
[0:48] We're continuing our analysis of the transcripts of the conversation between Gresham Voss, a reporter, and Karen Reed.
[0:55] There was a follow-up meeting for which we now have the transcript. Let's watch.
[0:59] Oh, when does the Dateline thing come out?
[1:03] Not until it's adjudicated. It's embargoed. No, we're not going to be everywhere. Just the Today Show. It's only because we probably can't speak again.
[1:15] Yeah, and you look really nice, by the way.
[1:17] Oh, my God, thank you. I have on the exact same clothes that I wore the last time I saw you.
[1:23] I am so fussy about the pants and everything.
[1:27] This was filmed in New York. Like, this was done in March.
[1:32] This is who Dennis is.
[1:34] So, Alan and I were hoping that any gaps you have as you're going through this, anything that would fill in,
[1:40] especially from Alan, because you and I have spoken a lot, but is there anything that, like...
[1:45] What are the biggest problems with how the Commonwealth is approaching this?
[1:52] Like, not giving you the evidence you need? Like, just from his point of view?
[1:56] Apparently, after doing a very long interview, they had this follow-up interview where it was just Alan Jackson, Gretchen Voss, and Karen.
[2:05] This is interesting. So, I was just telling Karen that I went by the waterfall last weekend,
[2:11] and I wasn't going to, like, sit there and interview everyone, but this waitress was really chatty, and I was like,
[2:19] oh, you know, and I just kind of brought it up and blah, blah, blah, and she goes, yeah.
[2:23] Was her name Bridget?
[2:24] I don't know her name, because I was just trying to be. She had brown hair. She had...
[2:30] Heavy?
[2:30] Heavy tattoos.
[2:32] Poor Bridget being called heavy by both Gretchen and Karen.
[2:35] I think she testified before the grand jury.
[2:38] She said to me that we never served her.
[2:41] They didn't serve me.
[2:43] Never said... never served her.
[2:44] I didn't drink there.
[2:46] That's Karen Reed telling Gretchen that she never drank at the waterfall, and I didn't think she did either,
[2:51] but we do have some video from the waterfall that may contradict what she just said there.
[2:56] Okay, then I need to go back. For some reason, I thought they had, like, your drinks by the time...
[3:02] I was at a bar before, and they knew by the bills...
[3:06] That the bar before...
[3:09] But I didn't really drink at the second bar. I just socialized.
[3:12] We know that Karen and John were at C.F. McCarthy's, a bar located near the waterfall.
[3:17] After they left C.F. McCarthy's, they went over to the waterfall.
[3:21] According to Brian Patrick Higgins' old Higgy Bear, Karen and John were able to smuggle out Karen's drink from C.F. McCarthy's and bring it to the waterfall.
[3:30] And this is the same girl. She's heavy.
[3:34] Yeah.
[3:34] There's only, like, two bartenders. That's the owner's daughter.
[3:39] She's gruff.
[3:40] She testified before the grand jury that I didn't appear drunk.
[3:44] I was talking. I was fine. There was no arguing. And no, she didn't serve me. I never went to the bar.
[3:50] Interesting. So I must have conflated the two places.
[3:54] We were at both places for 90 minutes. So 90 minutes at the end of the night with no alcohol.
[3:59] Okay, we just heard Karen claim that for 90 minutes at the waterfall, she didn't have any alcoholic drinks.
[4:05] And that's what I thought initially until Samantha correctly pointed out that Karen did have drinks at the waterfall. Let's watch.
[4:13] Brian's making everyone come over and do a shot. Karen doesn't drink it.
[4:16] And look at John lurking in the back. And this is important, too, throughout the rest of the night.
[4:20] Here comes a shot. Higgy doesn't look.
[4:23] She doesn't do it or he does?
[4:24] Because Brian Albert commanded everyone at the bar to react and do this.
[4:30] Yeah.
[4:31] Yeah, Higgins drinks it. She doesn't drink it. Higgins does.
[4:34] She does not.
[4:34] No, she does.
[4:36] Well, she's drinking something.
[4:38] Boy, was I wrong. Karen down that shot like a champ.
[4:41] Oh, yeah. I never saw that, actually.
[4:43] She did do it.
[4:43] Is that the shot?
[4:45] I think it was.
[4:46] Wow. Wow. I thought she gave it to someone else.
[4:49] That's interesting.
[4:49] Wait, let's look again.
[4:50] Yeah, she's definitely got her arm up and she's nodding and whatever he's saying, she's...
[4:58] Wow.
[5:00] Oh, she's got it in her hand.
[5:01] Ah, she turns.
[5:03] She sips it.
[5:03] Nope, she does it.
[5:05] That is a shot.
[5:06] All right.
[5:07] I can't do a shot. I'm a big pansy.
[5:08] That definitely is true.
[5:09] Now, let's look to see if Karen's actually doing the shot.
[5:15] And here is something I just noticed.
[5:17] Look at everybody's face and arms when Brian Albert is commanding everyone to do a shot.
[5:23] Naturally, everyone's looking towards the middle except for one person.
[5:26] Brian Patrick Higgins, old Higgy Bear.
[5:29] He keeps his head directly pointed to the left.
[5:32] It's awkward and it definitely indicates something up because if he turns his head just a little
[5:36] to the right, he would make eye contact with John.
[5:39] Something is up between these two, obviously.
[5:44] And look at this.
[5:45] Higgy Bear's face is looking straight down.
[5:47] He can't even look to the right because John is right there.
[5:53] Wow is right.
[5:54] She's got it in her hand.
[5:56] Ah, she turns.
[5:57] She sips it.
[5:58] Nope, she does it.
[5:59] That is a shot.
[6:01] And look at Higgy Bear's face when he's drinking his Jameson and Ginger.
[6:04] He turns directly away from John O'Keefe.
[6:07] All right.
[6:07] I can't do a shot.
[6:08] I'm a big pansy.
[6:13] He was just saying to Karen, I was hoping to get from you your biggest points of the things
[6:20] that you think the Commonwealth is just the most egregious things that they're doing right
[6:26] now.
[6:26] The evidence you haven't seen.
[6:29] Any of it.
[6:30] Told the court on February 8th it would be all done in 30 days.
[6:34] Kills our momentum too because our case is built on the lies that we find in their case.
[6:39] The inconsistencies and the more they give us lies and I were speaking on the phone last
[6:46] night.
[6:46] She goes, I can't wait to get this latest discovery.
[6:50] The criminalistics reports and we love going through it because it's boom, boom, boom.
[6:56] This isn't what they said three months ago.
[6:58] This isn't what they said two years ago.
[7:00] We know the Commonwealth delayed turning over evidence and the judge Beverly Canoni made
[7:05] it very hard for her team to obtain critical electronic data, specifically where Brian Albert
[7:11] and Brian Patrick Higgins were during that morning.
[7:14] And I feel like they want them.
[7:18] It's a great question, though.
[7:20] What do they think the end game is?
[7:23] It's almost easier to prove first degree or manslaughter.
[7:27] Part of what's precipitated this is we asked for John's forensic image of his phone and we
[7:33] were able to prove that he had waves on that night.
[7:37] Getting the forensics from John's phone was very critical because it showed the route for
[7:42] which Karen and John took.
[7:43] It was impossible for them to have been at 34 Fairview before 1224.
[7:48] Recall that when we initially started this, we thought that John was at the house at 1221.
[7:53] It's simply impossible based upon the route they took and the video evidence of Karen driving
[7:59] by the various locations for which we have video.
[8:02] Remember, Karen went a weird route.
[8:04] She actually missed the turn, causing her arrival to be delayed.
[8:07] And that I approached the house from a direction that would not have necessitated a three-point
[8:14] turn and they got screwed by that.
[8:16] She certainly did.
[8:18] And now we can understand partially why that was missed by her team initially.
[8:23] And raise the question, how would I be if I changed my story 18 innings into this case?
[8:32] Not even location tracking.
[8:34] What mile did it occur?
[8:37] They didn't even say what time.
[8:40] Higgins also testified he was parked in the street the entire night, which also contradicts
[8:47] Nagel's testimony and Matt McCabe and Jen McCabe.
[8:52] I'm not sure exactly how that contradicts Hen McCabe's and Chubb's McCabe's testimony with
[8:57] regard to the Jeep.
[8:58] We know that Brian Patrick did not park his girly Jeep in front of the house during the
[9:02] initial part of that night.
[9:04] Street?
[9:05] Higgins says he was parked in front where he would have been, where his Jeep was between
[9:10] Ryan Nagel and me.
[9:12] Jen McCabe didn't testify that she saw Higgins' Jeep.
[9:15] Matt didn't and Ryan didn't.
[9:17] I think Karen's referring to their testimony at the grand jury.
[9:21] So that also would have been visible.
[9:23] He stayed there all night until he left at 1.30 to go do administrative work.
[9:27] I know you hate the air quotes and the road bends.
[9:31] Did you go by the other night?
[9:32] In the direction that we know I came in, they have not released the details of the 62 feet.
[9:38] That's been in discovery a month ago.
[9:40] Karen's referring to the dopey data from the car that doesn't have any date corresponding
[9:45] with it.
[9:46] Apparently, it indicates her vehicle traveled 62 feet in reverse.
[9:49] The problem is we don't know exactly when that was because the software that outputs
[9:53] that data does not correlate it with the actual time.
[9:57] So it's virtually useless.
[9:58] And that's nothing I can see?
[10:00] I don't think we're going to have time, Alan.
[10:02] We have to have everything filed by tomorrow.
[10:04] And then Gretchen's music.
[10:06] Another thing we can also share because it wasn't in one of the affidavits exhibits.
[10:10] Um, we can show her the path of travel that John and I took from the bar, the Waves' map
[10:18] with the way we went, because that's our evidence.
[10:21] It sounds like Karen's the lead attorney in charge.
[10:23] Also that John's phone pinged at 8 at Good Samaritan, and nobody reported to be at the
[10:29] hospital, particularly with John's phone.
[10:32] There was some controversy early on with regard to John's phone.
[10:36] There is no evidence that it was ever removed from 34 Fairview until after his body was discovered
[10:42] there.
[10:43] That wasn't something we released either.
[10:44] We purposely left that out.
[10:47] John's phone started to leave the crime scene.
[10:50] Then it went back.
[10:51] This is at 7.
[10:53] And then at 8, it's in Brockton at Good Samaritan.
[10:56] It goes to Canton PD, and that's where it stays.
[10:58] We heard the audio from a PD cruiser where Lank and that big old boy Seraph were sitting,
[11:03] and they actually referenced having John's phone.
[11:06] No, then it goes to, at midnight, it goes to the DA's office in Canton, and then it shuts
[11:11] off.
[11:12] I think it's amazing that the McCabes and Carrie Roberts, I'm still thinking about what they
[11:20] said to her, that they won't talk.
[11:22] That perfectly confirms it.
[11:24] Why wouldn't they say, we know there was something?
[11:27] Why would they lie and say something like, we believe he wanted to break up with her?
[11:31] And I don't know, we can't speak, but there's something coming out, which there isn't.
[11:37] I mean, I don't know.
[11:38] That makes me happy that I think that, even though she doesn't ever go over to the body,
[11:45] but she notices that the phone is under him.
[11:48] They're referring to Carrie Roberts and a theory that perhaps the phone was planted
[11:52] on John's body after it was found.
[11:55] There's just simply not enough evidence to make that contention.
[11:58] She's not there.
[11:59] We watched the video.
[12:01] When they put his body on the gurney, she is not there.
[12:05] Asked her if there's blankets in the car, and she asked, because we're in Carrie Roberts'
[12:11] car.
[12:11] She says, Carrie, are there blankets?
[12:13] And Carrie says, look in the trunk.
[12:15] Very fascinating conversation between Karen Reed and the reporter Gretchen Voss.
[12:21] This was the second meeting several months later after the initial meeting, which was
[12:26] much longer and had about 170 pages worth of transcripts.
[12:30] Because we have yet to hear Karen testify at trial or during her deposition, this is as
[12:36] close as we're going to come to hearing her story.
[12:38] And despite some inconsistencies, it doesn't really matter.
[12:42] Karen Reed never struck John O'Keefe with her SUV because there was just one person waiting
[12:47] and lurking that was in love with her, that was texting the rival mailmate, you coming here.
[12:54] Yes, I said you coming here, followed by three question marks.
[12:57] Just minutes before he did, and just minutes before he tacked, and that was Brian Patrick
[13:01] Higgins' old Hickey Bear.
[13:03] You can blame everyone else in the world, but there's only one person that had the means,
[13:07] motive, and opportunity to kill John O'Keefe.
[13:10] And that's our old cuddly but violent Hickey Bear.
[13:13] So no matter what, we will never listen closely, Brian Patrick Higgins, ever stop producing these
[13:19] videos until the real killer, Brian Higgins, is brought to justice.
[13:23] This crime was very simple to solve because it took place within a very small area over
[13:27] a very short period of time with a very limited amount of suspects.
[13:31] One or more of these 10 people has to be the killer of John O'Keefe.
[13:35] That's how easy this is.
[13:36] Once you remove the kids and the McCabes, you're down to just three suspects.
[13:40] Brian Albert, Higgy Bear, and Chloe.
[13:42] Since Chloe's a good dog, she didn't do it.
[13:44] I didn't do it.
[13:46] I'm a good dog.
[13:47] I didn't do it.
[13:47] So that leaves just two suspects, Brian Albert and Higgy Bear.
[13:51] But of the two Bryans, only one had the means, motive, and opportunity to kill John O'Keefe.
[13:57] And that's our old cuddly but violent Higgy Bear.
[13:59] Once we had all the facts and didn't jump to conclusions to see how easy it was to solve
[14:03] this crime.
[14:04] Tell me about who you discussed this temperature information with.
[14:09] It was with Hank.
[14:12] This is truly the master class.
[14:14] You're hesitating and I can't hear you.
[14:15] Who did you discuss with Hank?
[14:17] If you want to learn how to do courtroom testimony, you watch Ian Whiffen.
[14:20] Hank.
[14:21] Excuse me?
[14:22] With Mr. Brennan.
[14:23] Attorney Brennan?
[14:24] Yes.
[14:24] Ian was amazing in court.
[14:26] The judge was even smiling at you, Ian, when you were done testifying.
[14:31] I felt like everyone wanted to give you a round of applause.
[14:33] What is freezing in Fahrenheit?
[14:36] I don't know.
[14:37] The way Ian can explain extremely technical details is astounding.
[14:44] Would you agree that 32 degrees Fahrenheit is the freezing point in Fahrenheit?
[14:49] Um, this is a good question.
[14:52] I honestly wouldn't know.
[14:53] The kids think Ian's a doctor because he's so smart.
[14:56] Uh-oh, it looks like Sir Ian Whiffen failed to properly convert Celsius to Fahrenheit.
[15:01] So he's Dr. Whiffen, according to our household.
[15:04] Okay, I didn't get a degree.
[15:05] I'm originally from the UK.