About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of 'Who Won The 2020 Election?': Richard Blumenthal Grills Trump Judicial Nominees from Forbes Breaking News, published November 14, 2026. The transcript contains 1,025 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"you, Mr. Chairman. Let's see if we can get maybe some original answers. Mr. Akson, who won the 2020 election? Senator Blumenthal, Joe Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 election. Go right down the panel. If you are going to answer the same way, just say ditto. I would agree with that..."
[0:00] you, Mr. Chairman. Let's see if we can get maybe some original answers. Mr. Akson, who won the 2020
[0:08] election? Senator Blumenthal, Joe Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 election.
[0:14] Go right down the panel. If you are going to answer the same way, just say ditto.
[0:21] I would agree with that answer, Senator. Ditto, Senator. Yes, sir. Ditto. And was the Capitol
[0:30] attacked on January 6th, 2021? Senator, there were acts of violence, lawlessness, trespass,
[0:38] and destruction of property that day. But you're not willing to say the Capitol was attacked?
[0:44] Senator, again, I condemn the acts of violence, lawlessness, trespass, and destruction of property
[0:50] that day. Mr. Akson, ditto. Senator, I would just add that whether the events of that day are
[0:58] characterized as an attack could have legal ramifications. So that's a ditto, correct?
[1:02] Senator, I've condemned the acts of violence on that day.
[1:09] Mr. Kelly. Ditto, Senator. Ditto. Mr. Dr. Klein. Yes, sir. Ditto. Yes, sir. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto,
[1:19] ditto, ditto, ditto. That's where we are on the United States District Court. Dr. Klein. Do you agree
[1:34] with President Trump that human trafficking is a quote unquote scourge? Senator, I have had human
[1:43] trafficking victims on my caseload over my career. So I'm very much in favor of whatever
[1:50] we can do to eradicate human trafficking. And do you agree with President Trump that it
[1:57] is a scourge? That's the word he used. Do you agree or not? I'm unsure, to be honest.
[2:06] You're unsure whether it's a scourge? Well, let me ask you this. I'm not scourge what the parameters
[2:10] of the word scourge sort of is. What I'm going to say is- Is it a bad thing? Is it an evil?
[2:16] Senator, yes, sir. Okay. So let me ask you, you must be aware that the Trump administration
[2:28] has allowed about $190 million in anti-human trafficking grants to lapse. And it has withheld
[2:38] about 75 percent of money appropriated by the United States Congress for groups that aid victims of human
[2:48] trafficking. It's about $130 million that should be going to support human trafficking survivors
[2:55] and strengthen law enforcement's ability to fight trafficking crime, which President Trump has
[3:02] called a quote unquote scourge. And you agree that it's a bad thing? Well, Senator, if I'm confirmed,
[3:10] I'm going to follow all federal laws regarding grant implementation. So I very much take serious
[3:17] the victims of- Well, let me ask the question, if you don't mind, before you provide an answer.
[3:24] Oh, I'm sorry. The question is, will you commit, if confirmed, to release all of the anti-trafficking
[3:34] funds currently withheld by the Trump administration? Yes or no? Senator, I'm sorry,
[3:40] I didn't mean to interrupt you a second ago. I am going to work diligently to get these resources
[3:45] from the Office of Justice- Is that a yes? You will release the money. I'm going to be committed
[3:50] to addressing and getting the funds to those Americans who need them the most. Yes, sir.
[3:57] You know, you'll work diligently. So the answer is yes. Would you agree with me? Yes?
[4:04] Yes. I'm going to work and do and follow all the stipulation and guidelines to get our taxpayer dollars,
[4:09] be a good shepherd of the taxpayer dollars, to get those resources, human trafficking victims and
[4:14] other victims of crime, to ensure that Americans stay safe. I'm going to take that as a yes,
[4:23] that you will release the money. I'm going to hold you to it. I think our United States Congress
[4:27] should hold you to it because human trafficking is a scourge and the victims deserve all of the money
[4:34] and more that Congress has appropriate for this purpose. You know, in your answers to Senator Kennedy
[4:43] talking about homelessness, you mentioned the criminal process. Do you think that homeless people
[4:50] should be arrested? No, sir. But I do believe that we as an institution, local authorities could be a
[4:58] benefit in helping and assisting individuals out of their plight and suffering. I'm not saying they need
[5:04] to be arrested, but I do believe that we do, as human to human, do better at providing intervention
[5:13] to get them from point A, suffering in the street, to point B, in treatment, into self-sufficiency.
[5:18] So just to clarify, you would not favor arresting or prosecuting people?
[5:24] I wouldn't favor. I don't favor that, but I do believe we could marshal resources in a fashion
[5:31] that will help people get the services that they need. So you might not favor it,
[5:35] but local authorities should be permitted to arrest homeless people? I feel like I wasn't even
[5:42] referring to arrest. What I'm trying to say is, if you have resources in the community, we should use
[5:47] them to help Americans. And allowing somebody to suffer in blight isn't something that I favor.
[5:55] Non-criminal resources? Well, non-criminal resources.
[6:01] And I don't even mean, I'm a person in long-term recovery, too. So I've been around. I've been
[6:07] in my own addiction. I've been out there. So I know exactly sort of what I'm saying. But
[6:13] I wouldn't want to remove resources from individuals who are in need. If they're suffering in the street,
[6:19] I would like to help them. So if they're suffering in the street, maybe they should be in jail? That's a good
[6:23] place for them to be? No, sir. Okay. I just want to clarify in fairness to you.
[6:30] Okay. So what I'm saying is that there's suffering in this street.
[6:36] Should we just let them be there? And what I'm looking at is, who would actually be the
[6:41] resources? First responders on some level could be there as well. So in what I'm trying to say is,
[6:47] I believe these individuals need services and they need Americans to human to human to actually
[6:57] assist them getting from point A, the suffering in the street.
[6:59] I'm out of time, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.
[7:02] Before I call on Senator Blackburn, she's going to close the meeting down. I want to thank you
[7:08] folks and compliment you. The last advice I give, you heard me give to the