About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of White House ‘not willing to make meaningful reforms’ to ICE: Van Hollen, published March 30, 2026. The transcript contains 1,666 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Democrats held firm in our opposition that Donald Trump's rogue and deadly militia should not get more funding without serious reforms, and we will continue to fight for those reforms. Senate Democrats stood united, no wavering, no backing down. We held the line. Senate Minority Leader Chuck..."
[0:00] Democrats held firm in our opposition that Donald Trump's rogue and deadly militia
[0:06] should not get more funding without serious reforms, and we will continue to fight for those reforms.
[0:14] Senate Democrats stood united, no wavering, no backing down. We held the line.
[0:21] Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer celebrating prematurely the House later blocked the bill
[0:29] that was passed unanimously by the Senate. I'm joined now by Senator Chris Van Hollen, Democrat of Maryland.
[0:34] Thank you for being here, Senator.
[0:36] Good to be with you.
[0:36] So, I mean, what's the bottom line here? I mean, you guys are on recess for two weeks.
[0:43] Homeland Security is not funded. Where's this going?
[0:47] So, the bottom line, as you just discussed with Steve Scalise, is that you had a bipartisan bill,
[0:54] Republicans and Democrats, pass the Senate that would immediately fully fund TSA,
[1:00] and by the way, FEMA and the Coast Guard, while we continue to negotiate reforms to ICE,
[1:08] a lawless ICE operation. And the Republican Speaker of the House refused to even have a vote on that
[1:14] in the House and went home, as we have these big lines at airports.
[1:18] Now, President Trump has said he has the emergency authority to spend money for TSA.
[1:24] And the question I have is, why didn't he use that 45 days ago?
[1:29] And is he going to now?
[1:30] So, when the Senate passed that bill, and there was that brief moment that looked like, you know, dawn had broken,
[1:37] you put out a statement saying that Republicans had, quote, finally relented.
[1:43] What did Democrats get out of this, even if that passed? What did you get out of this?
[1:47] This DHS shutdown's going on for well over a month. What have you gotten for it?
[1:52] Well, the issue here, John, is we let people know, number one, that we want to fully fund TSA.
[1:59] We could get rid of these lines at the airport.
[2:01] We could get rid of these lines at the airport.
[2:02] We could get rid of these lines at the airport.
[2:02] We could get rid of these lines at the airport.
[2:02] We could get rid of these lines at the airport.
[2:03] But we also made clear that we're going to demand reforms of a lawless ICE operation.
[2:09] After all, DSA agents killed two American citizens in Minneapolis.
[2:15] And the president and his team called the victims domestic terrorists.
[2:21] So, for example, we've said you can't expect DHS to conduct a credible, independent investigation.
[2:28] They're denying information to the local law enforcement authorities.
[2:32] They're denying information to the local law enforcement authorities.
[2:32] Minneapolis and Minnesota, they've blocked access.
[2:36] Those states have had to sue.
[2:38] So, we say you need to be able to hold people accountable for wrongdoing.
[2:43] And they say they don't want to do that.
[2:44] By the way, I should point out that, obviously, ICE has more than enough money.
[2:49] After all, the president is now deploying ICE agents to airports.
[2:53] We should have TSA agents at airports.
[2:56] Yeah, I mean, I guess what's confusing here is you have fought and blocked the funding for the Department of Health.
[3:02] You have blocked the funding for the Department of Homeland Security because you object, as you just outlined, to what ICE has been doing.
[3:08] And you wanted to force changes.
[3:10] And yet, the only thing that has been assured throughout all of this is that ICE already has the money.
[3:17] Because, as you said, $75 billion passed in the budget bill last year.
[3:22] So, you're holding up the entirety of the Department of Homeland Security because you object to ICE and you want changes to ICE.
[3:29] But through it all, ICE continues to have the money.
[3:32] John, we're not holding up all of the money for all the Department of Homeland Security.
[3:37] That's just a false statement.
[3:39] We have said repeatedly, repeatedly, we should fund TSA, we should fund FEMA, we should fund the Coast Guard.
[3:47] We are not prepared to give ICE another $10 billion on top of the monies they already have and are using in many of these lawless operations.
[3:57] We're not going to give them another $10 billion unless they make fundamental reforms.
[4:02] $10 billion.
[4:03] You're holding people accountable for the killing of American citizens.
[4:06] And fighting over that additional $10 billion, you are holding up the rest of the Department of Homeland Security.
[4:10] We're not holding it up.
[4:11] No, John, we're not holding it up.
[4:14] We have now voted 10 times.
[4:16] Right, but you're holding it up unless it doesn't include money for ICE.
[4:20] That's just a fact.
[4:21] Unless it doesn't include money for ICE, a very reformed ICE.
[4:25] That's right.
[4:26] Which already has the money.
[4:27] But why not fund TSA now?
[4:30] That's what we've said.
[4:31] That's what the House blocked.
[4:32] Let's be really clear.
[4:33] That's a very good question, and you heard me talk to Congress.
[4:35] That is the question.
[4:37] But let me ask you.
[4:38] The White House did agree to some reforms as you were negotiating all of this.
[4:45] You had a letter that was given to the GOP negotiators from the White House saying they would agree to increasing body cam footage,
[4:54] to retaining that body cam footage, sharing it with Congress, to limit immigration enforcement at sensitive locations,
[5:03] like schools and hospitals.
[5:05] It agreed to require officers to clearly display their identification and verbalize their affiliation.
[5:13] Now, that's all gone.
[5:14] I mean, that was something that, I mean, what's happened due to that?
[5:19] I mean, that was at least something you were getting.
[5:21] Yeah, look.
[5:21] But it's gone.
[5:22] At the end of the day, John, they were not willing to make meaningful reforms in my view.
[5:27] So, for example, what I was just talking about, holding lawless DHS agents accountable.
[5:36] For the killing of American citizens.
[5:38] We want some independent, credible review.
[5:42] We don't think you can trust the agency that called Renee Good and Alex Preddy domestic terrorists to conduct a credible, independent investigation.
[5:52] I mean, do you think that would be credible?
[5:54] They refuse to do that.
[5:56] In fact, as I said, the state of Minnesota is now trying to sue the FBI and the federal government to get basic information about the killings of American citizens.
[6:06] Yeah.
[6:07] I mean, it's incredible.
[6:08] But let me.
[6:09] But what's incredible, though, is that they refuse to allow that independent, credible investigation.
[6:15] That's what's amazing.
[6:16] I'm not going to give them another $10 billion when you've got two American citizens killed by these agents and they're calling them domestic terrorists.
[6:25] And to this day, refusing to apologize to the families.
[6:28] And they already have $75 billion in the pipeline.
[6:31] So, let me.
[6:32] So, the question then is why are they so determined?
[6:36] To shut down TSA when, in fact, you're right.
[6:41] I mean, ICE does have money right now.
[6:43] We just don't want to give them any more.
[6:45] So, the president said he's going to.
[6:47] He's ordered DHS to pay the ICE officers, even though money hasn't been appropriated here.
[6:51] First of all, is he able to do that?
[6:54] And for how long?
[6:55] I mean, do you have a sense of the legality of that?
[6:58] I don't completely.
[7:00] But they do have, as we've been discussing.
[7:02] They do have a lot of money.
[7:03] Billions of dollars.
[7:04] Yes.
[7:04] That Republicans provided them in what they called.
[7:07] A big, beautiful bill where they gave billionaires these huge tax breaks, cut Medicaid.
[7:11] But they managed to fund ICE.
[7:14] And so, if the president does have that authority, what's he waiting for?
[7:19] Okay.
[7:19] So, in the time we have left on the war, they are preparing a budget request.
[7:26] Pentagon has suggested $200 billion.
[7:28] We don't know what it's going to be.
[7:30] Do you think that.
[7:32] I know you're opposed.
[7:33] Does that pass?
[7:35] Well, I hope not.
[7:36] Because I don't think we should be providing.
[7:38] More money for an illegal war of choice to a president who promised during the campaign
[7:45] that he would not drag America into new wars, especially in the Middle East and a war that
[7:52] is now making us less, not more safe and has already cost American lives, is costing billions
[7:57] of dollars every day.
[7:59] Oil and gas prices are going up.
[8:01] So, the president who said he was going to focus on bringing down prices and ending foreign
[8:06] wars has started foreign wars along with Prime Minister.
[8:09] But I think that's not near as far back as what we are.
[8:11] If you look on the internet in Yahoo and prices are going through the roof.
[8:15] So, no.
[8:16] We should not keep funding an illegal war of choice that's making us less safe.
[8:20] And yet, you have a depletion of weapons, of ammunition, of missiles, of missile defense
[8:25] systems.
[8:27] I mean, doesn't that need to be replenished whether or not you support the war?
[8:33] What happens there?
[8:34] These are moneys they're asking for to continue an illegal war of choice.
[8:39] Trump, I saw you quoting some of his earlier statements, you know, back more than two weeks
[8:44] ago, Donald Trump said, we won this war. And so the question for President Trump, who's completely
[8:50] delusional, is if we won the war, why are they preparing to send thousands of more American
[8:56] troops into harm's way? And last question, have you been at, you've been to these briefings,
[8:59] have you? I have been to these briefings. And you heard what Scalise claims that they're
[9:04] substantive. We've heard from other Republicans that they're complaining they're not getting
[9:10] information. What's your... No, what you learn in these briefings is exactly what you're hearing
[9:14] outside the briefings, which is they don't have any particular objective. It's a constantly
[9:19] changing objective. Okay. And there's no end game whatsoever. Meanwhile, the war is widening,
[9:25] as you discussed, and Americans are less safe. And we're spending billions of dollars,
[9:32] both in terms of taxpayer money and at the pump. All right, Senator Van Hollen,
[9:37] thank you very much for joining us. Thanks, John.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →