Try Free

White House briefing after shooting at White House Correspondents' Dinner

LiveNOW from FOX May 12, 2026 40m 6,874 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of White House briefing after shooting at White House Correspondents' Dinner from LiveNOW from FOX, published May 12, 2026. The transcript contains 6,874 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Good afternoon. It is 12.50 p.m. Eastern Time, 9.50 a.m. Pacific Time. You are looking at live images right now of the White House Press Briefing Room. We're at about 1.15 Eastern Time. We're expecting White House Press Secretary Caroline Lovett to address members of the media for a White House..."

[0:05] Good afternoon. It is 12.50 p.m. Eastern Time, 9.50 a.m. Pacific Time. You are looking at live [1:39] images right now of the White House Press Briefing Room. We're at about 1.15 Eastern Time. We're [1:47] expecting White House Press Secretary Caroline Lovett to address members of the media for a [1:53] White House Press Briefing. This, of course, is coming after the White House Correspondents [1:58] Dinner shooting that took place on Saturday evening at the Washington Hilton in Washington, [2:04] D.C. All attendees were evacuated. Nobody was hurt. There were no deaths in the room. The suspect is [2:11] due in court later today, and we are expected that topic, as well as the Iran War, to be addressed [2:18] by Caroline Lovett. Again, that's coming to you at 1.15 p.m. Eastern Time. In the meantime, [2:27] I'm Adam Lorenz. Welcome here inside Live Now from Fox, where we are going to bring you the latest [2:32] news and information from across the United States and around the world. You are watching a live [2:38] YouTube stream of Live Now from Fox right now, and again, we are standing by for that White House [2:44] Press Briefing. In the meantime, we're going to be joined shortly here by a professor from the [2:49] University of Southern California, Mr. Morris Levy, to give us more information on the political [2:55] ramifications of the Iran War. You're looking at a live shot right now of the University of Southern [3:01] California. It looks like a beautiful day out there in Los Angeles, and now let's bring in [3:07] Professor Levy into the conversation. Professor Morris Levy, how are you doing today? [3:12] I'm fine, thanks. It's always a beautiful day in Southern California. [3:15] That's right. That's right. Thank you so much, Professor, for being on with us today. [3:20] What are you expecting to hear from Caroline Levitt here in about 15, 20 minutes, especially in light [3:27] of what happened on Saturday evening? Yeah, my guess is that Caroline Levitt will try to focus [3:35] attention on what happened on Saturday evening. I think these types of events, may they never occur, [3:44] but they do tend to elicit sympathy for those who are targeted. And in this case, I think you'll see [3:54] a concerted effort to try to call attention to what the right, conservatives, Republicans think is an [4:03] ongoing threat from inflammatory rhetoric on the left that has real ramifications in cases like this. [4:12] It's not to say that this rhetoric is directly responsible for what happened. The individual [4:19] is. But I imagine that Caroline Levitt will try to make the case that the incendiary rhetoric and [4:27] name-calling that one hears is a real palpable threat to Republicans and that it needs to be toned down. [4:35] Yeah, yeah. Let's go to the Iran war right now. I know that you have a lot of experience talking [4:41] about international relations. What do you think right now is sort of the political judgment of [4:47] President Trump? Is the war right now, is it helping him politically nationwide? Is it hurting him? I [4:54] know we're kind of looking ahead to midterms here in November as well. We certainly are. I think, [5:01] you know, the part that I omitted in what I said a moment ago is that in focusing on what happened [5:08] Saturday night, Ms. Levitt will probably try to take some attention away from the war on Iran. She [5:14] won't be able to do that entirely. The reason for that is that the war is quite unpopular in American [5:21] public opinion. We see this in poll after poll. I can get into it with you about, you know, why that [5:28] is and why President Trump hasn't been more successful in ginning up public support. But the [5:36] bottom line is that as things stand right now, the war is a liability on multiple fronts. Polling shows [5:41] that Americans don't have a clear understanding of why we got into the war. Also, what the war aims are, [5:48] what we hope to achieve in the war. They are skeptical that we've succeeded in achieving whatever [5:54] the war aims are. And they're very nervous about the fallout of the war for pocketbook type concerns, [6:01] most notably, probably the price of gas and energy. Yeah. Yeah. Do you think that I know President [6:09] Trump has mentioned the price of gas multiple times over the last few weeks? Do you think those [6:15] pocketbook concerns, as you phrased it there very eloquently, do you think that those matter more to [6:20] Americans, maybe more so than, you know, kind of talking about the Strait of Hormuz or getting into [6:26] like deep war strategy and war talk? Where do where did the where does the average American kind of [6:33] fall into all of this? Sure. So, you know, Americans have concerns about foreign policy, but those tend to [6:40] pale in comparison to their concerns about, you know, their immediate day to day life, how much things cost. [6:48] People were already pretty unhappy about the situation with what is now being referred to as [6:55] affordability concerns. Gas certainly factors into that. We're a nation of drivers and commuters. And [7:02] so this is a big issue. By contrast, what's happening over there, the Strait of Hormuz, halfway around the [7:10] world, these things are a little bit harder for for people to sort of sink their teeth into. And so [7:17] so there are two things that you could say about it. One is that foreign policy concerns tend, for the [7:24] most part, not to be central in political campaigns and in what drives people who are maybe on the fence [7:32] to vote one way or the other. They're typically not nearly as important as economic concerns. [7:37] On the other hand, I think, you know, if President Trump had succeeded in rallying support for this [7:47] war, he might have had a little bit more running room to to explain to the public, look, you know, [7:52] there's some sacrifice in the short term, but it's for an important purpose that serves the American [7:58] national interest. I think there's a case to be made for that. I don't think President Trump and the [8:04] administration have been terribly successful in making that case yet. And so if you want to sort [8:09] of summarize what what a typical voter is thinking, it's something like, I know there's a connection [8:17] between stuff the administration is doing halfway around the world and and rising prices now. And I [8:25] don't understand why they're doing this stuff halfway around the world. And I'm pretty unhappy about [8:30] having to pay another dollar, dollar and a half at the pump. It's also possible, you know, economic [8:35] projections are notoriously iffy, but it's possible that the economic situation could get worse here. [8:41] So far, the US has been more resilient than a lot of other places where we have a greater energy [8:50] independence, we had an economy that was in, by and large, very good shape relative to a lot of other [8:56] countries. And, and yet, you know, people were not happy already with the situation. And it is a [9:05] little bit late in the game for the administration to be blaming Biden for this for the the unhappiness. [9:12] So I think it's it's really two things. It's it's not that Americans are going to get into most [9:17] Americans are going to get into the nitty gritty of, you know, is the blockade working? How many ships [9:23] has Iran taken? How many have we stopped, you know, but they're, they're confused about what's [9:29] going on with the war and, and, and what they do see in their own lives is higher prices. And so that's [9:37] something that the administration is probably going to have to get a little bit more adept at [9:41] addressing. Yeah, and I expect White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt to address that here as [9:47] well. Let's go back to Saturday evening, the suspect that's in custody, who carried out this shooting at [9:55] the Washington Hilton. The reports are that he's from Torrance, California, just not too far from from USC's [10:01] campus. What's been the local Southern California coverage of this shooter and of the situation in the [10:08] aftermath of Saturday night? Well, from what I've seen of the coverage, I don't think anyone is necessarily [10:14] playing up the the the ties to the to, you know, to the region here. This is, you know, this is [10:21] obviously somebody who snapped in in some way, and somebody who took incendiary rhetoric quite a bit [10:32] too literally. And, and so I think, you know, you're going to get a predictable pattern. Republicans are [10:41] going to try to play up the role that that some of this inflammatory rhetoric played in motivating [10:47] the the would be shooter. Well, he was a shooter, but the would be assassin. And, and I think Republicans [10:55] can also, sorry, Democrats can also point out that, you know, this type of behavior is not something that [11:03] they are explicitly condoning. And, and, and so, you know, locally, I think the reaction is much like the rest of the [11:11] country to this, it's, it's, it's a national event. And the what's relevant, I think, are the are the party [11:19] alignments. And those, those are not particularly distinct here from the rest of the country. We do have [11:24] Republicans in Southern California. Yes, yes, absolutely. Absolutely. Morris, you know, one thing that President Trump [11:31] spoke about, um, in, in the news conference, in the emergency news conference following the shooting [11:36] on Saturday night, he mentioned the unity that he experienced in the room when, you know, secret [11:41] service agents came, came in and told everybody to get down. And he said it felt like a, a unified room. [11:47] Do you expect this, uh, this feeling of unity? How long do you, do you expect it to, to last, uh, going [11:54] forward, uh, between the president and, and members of the media, a group that he has largely had a, a lot of [12:00] clashes with in the past? I think it's a good moment. I think it's genuine. I think events like [12:06] this, I mean, you know, almost nobody, uh, condones or accepts political violence and, um, and every, [12:14] everyone knows, uh, media and politicians alike that, uh, that this has ramifications for Democrats, [12:21] for Republicans, for, for journalists and for politicians. But I, I don't unfortunately expect [12:27] the moment of unity to last very long. The news cycle is what it is. We will move on. There'll be [12:32] another story. Someone will say something dumb, um, and, uh, and we'll be off to the races. There's a, [12:39] there's an equilibrium in our politics that is one, uh, that carries a lot of vitriol and polarization [12:45] at the elite level. And, um, and one, one event, uh, however, um, you know, however prominent, [12:53] uh, is just not going to, to derail that. Yeah. Professor, uh, Morris Levy, we appreciate all of [13:00] your insights on this matter. Uh, as we look ahead to this, uh, press briefing, uh, by Caroline [13:05] Leavitt here coming up any moment now, uh, thank you so much for, for joining me today and, uh, [13:10] looking forward to, uh, future conversations with you down the line. [13:14] My pleasure. Thanks a lot for having me. [13:16] Thank you so much, Professor. Take care. [13:18] All right. Take care. [13:18] All right. That was Professor Morris Levy from USC, uh, his political science department, [13:25] uh, previewing what we're expecting to hear from White House press secretary, Caroline [13:29] Leavitt. Uh, this press conference slated to begin at 1 15 PM Eastern time. That's 10 15 AM [13:36] Pacific time. Uh, what's bringing now, uh, into a live look inside that White House, uh, press [13:42] briefing room. It looks like, uh, some reporters are getting, uh, their microphones situated and [13:47] members of the press have, uh, taken their seats. Uh, let's take a live look and, uh, [13:51] listen in as to what's going on inside the White House press briefing room. [13:55] I think that will be one of the first questions here is to ask for the president on Saturday. [14:16] He wants to have this, uh, event within the next 30 days. And the big question is where are we [14:22] possible to do that? Do we go back to the whole day? And if so, what would the securities look [14:27] like? Um, good afternoon, everyone. Later today, president Trump and the first lady will welcome [14:42] King Charles and queen Camilla for a state visit here at the White House. First lady Melania [14:48] Trump has led all of the preparation for the state visit, which will honor the longstanding [14:53] and special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. As I told many [14:59] of you on Friday afternoon, I thought that would be my last time taking your questions until [15:04] after my maternity leave. But given the attempted assassination of the president and quote top [15:10] Trump administration officials, as the depraved shooter noted in his manifesto at the White [15:15] House Correspondents Association dinner on Saturday evening, I felt it was prudent to be here today [15:21] to answer your questions and inform the American people about how the administration is responding [15:26] to yet another attempt on president Trump's life. Saturday was supposed to be a joyful evening [15:33] celebrating free speech and the first amendment with all of you members of the press. Instead, [15:39] the night was hijacked by a crazed anti-Trump individual who traveled across the country to assassinate [15:46] the president and as many administration officials as possible. This is the third major assassination [15:52] attempt against President Trump in two years. No other president in history has faced such repeated, [15:59] serious attempts on his life. First and foremost, the president, the first lady and everyone in this [16:06] White House are extraordinarily grateful to the brave law enforcement professionals who sprang into action [16:12] to apprehend the would-be assassin and keep all of us safe. The president would especially like to express [16:18] his gratitude to the men and women of the United States Secret Service who acted with the utmost [16:23] professionalism, courage, and sense of duty. This includes the heroic agent who took a bullet to the chest. [16:31] Thankfully, he was saved by his bulletproof vest. Minutes after returning here to the White House, [16:36] to the Oval Office, despite fighting Secret Service to try to stay and keep the dinner going on Saturday, [16:42] ahead of addressing you here in the briefing room, President Trump was intent on speaking to this brave [16:48] agent to ensure he was okay. And the agent assured the president that he was. As you know, I was [16:54] seated next to President Trump and the first lady when the shots were fired before Secret Service [16:59] swiftly moved us to safety backstage. The president's calm in the face of chaos, while yet another [17:05] individual was trying to take his life, was really remarkable to witness. And it's something I will [17:11] never forget. President Trump is fearless because he loves this country and he is willing to put his own [17:18] life on the line to deliver on the promises that he made to the American public who elected him here [17:23] into the highest office in the land. And while we are blessed to have a fearless president, we should [17:29] not live in a country where such constant fear of political violence permeates our society every single [17:36] day. We can and we should have fierce disagreement in this country. As you all know, we disagree often, [17:44] myself in this role and all of you in the news media. But those disagreements must remain peaceful. [17:50] Debating, peaceful protesting and voting are how we need to settle disagreements, not bullets. Nobody [17:57] in recent years has faced more bullets and more violence than President Trump. This political violence [18:03] stems from a systemic demonization of him and his supporters by commentators, yes, by elected members of the [18:10] Democrat Party and even some in the media. This hateful and constant and violent rhetoric directed at [18:17] President Trump day after day after day for 11 years has helped legitimize this violence and bring us to [18:25] this dark moment. Those who constantly falsely label and slander the president as a fascist, as a threat to [18:32] democracy and compare him to Hitler to score political points are fueling this kind of violence. The left wing cults of [18:40] hatred against the president and all of those who support him and work for him has gotten multiple [18:46] people hurt and killed and it almost did so again this weekend. When you read the manifesto of this [18:53] shooter, ask yourselves, how different is the rhetoric from this almost assassin than what you read on social [19:00] media and hear in various forums every single day? The answer, if you're being honest with yourself, is that [19:06] there is no difference at all. Much of the manifesto of the would-be assassin is indistinguishable from [19:13] the words that we hear daily from so many. For example, as the First Lady of the United States [19:19] pointed out this morning, just two days prior to the shooting, ABC's late night host Jimmy Kemmel [19:25] disgustingly called First Lady Melania Trump an expectant widow. Who in their right minds says a wife [19:31] would be glowing over the potential murder of her beloved husband. And having experienced what I did [19:37] with the First Lady on Saturday night, I can tell you that she was anything but that. This kind of [19:42] rhetoric about the president, the First Lady and his supporters is completely deranged and it's [19:46] unbelievable that the American people are consuming it night after night after night. As President Trump [19:53] said on Saturday night at this podium, we as Americans must recommit ourselves to resolving our [19:58] differences peacefully and uniting around the shared values that make our country great. The deranged lies [20:05] and smears against the president, his family, his supporters have led crazy people to believe crazy [20:11] things and they are inspired to commit violence because of those words. It has to stop. And one more [20:18] point, Saturday night served as yet another reminder of how important it is to fund the Department of [20:24] Homeland Security. It is shameful that the United States Congress has kept this vital agency defunded [20:31] for 73 days, the longest shutdown of a federal agency in U.S. history. The Secret Service is a vital [20:39] component of DHS and has been directly impacted by this reckless political game and gamesmanship. [20:45] Everyone in this room who was there on Saturday night witnessed the heroes of Secret Service and federal [20:50] law enforcement jump into action in the face of grave danger and uncertainty. Agents put their own lives [20:57] in harm's way to protect the president, the first lady, the vice president and members of the cabinet. [21:03] One agent can be seen in video footage literally jumping onto the stage, not knowing where the attacker [21:10] was or where the bullets were coming from at that point to place his body in front of the president of the United [21:15] States. These men and women are heroes. They perform their duties daily and they have children and [21:21] families too. And they do it despite the political turmoil surrounding their agency. Make no mistake, [21:28] this defunding of DHS should be a national scandal. If Republicans defunded DHS and we saw in another [21:35] attempted assassination on a Democrat president, I would hope that the media coverage would be relentless [21:41] and unforgiving and I hope that it continues to be now. With the World Cup, America 250, the 2028 Olympics [21:48] and a presidential election all ahead, the Democrats obstruction is placing an enormous and totally [21:54] pointless burden on the Secret Service that can get more people killed. Enough is enough. There should be [22:00] no further debate about this. Democrats need to do what President Trump has been calling on them to do for [22:06] 73 days in a row and fund the Department of Homeland Security period. This is a national emergency and [22:14] every member of Congress needs to put their country over party and get the Department of Homeland Security [22:20] funded. With that, I will take a few of your questions today. Daniel, thank you for being here. [22:24] Why don't you kick us off? Thank you, Caroline. The president Saturday after the assassination [22:28] campaign here, he emphasized that law enforcement did their job in keeping everyone safe for dinner. [22:34] House Speaker Mike Johnson came out and said he, the president, needs greater protection. [22:39] What is the White House's message to the millions of Americans who wake up here today nervous, [22:44] uneasy about the safety of the president at events like this and safety of the cabinet members? [22:48] Well, we certainly understand their fears and their worries. As you heard from the president himself, [22:55] he continues to have trust in the United States Secret Service. As I just said, [22:59] these are great men and women who are doing their jobs and performing their honor their their duties [23:04] honorably. As we all witnessed on Saturday evening, within minutes, the president, the first lady, [23:10] the vice president, members of the president's cabinet were ushered out of the room. The perpetrator [23:15] who sought to inflict massive harm, as we all now know, with the release of the manifesto on administration [23:22] officials and the president himself, was stopped at the security parameter that was set up. He tried [23:28] to charge through it, as you saw on video, and he was quickly neutralized by Secret Service. And thank [23:33] God that he was. With that said, obviously, the White House is always asking the tough questions [23:38] and ensuring the safety of the president. I understand there will be a meeting early this week [23:43] convened by the White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles with top DHS leadership, members of the United [23:48] State Secret Service, and our own operations team here to ensure the safety and the security of [23:53] the president, as we do have many of these major events moving forward. So we're always monitoring [23:58] operations and procedures, always asking the tough questions to ensure the president is safe and the [24:03] American people should be assured there is no higher priority for the president and his staff than the [24:08] president's safety. [24:08] The Press on Friday, you said that you thought that that gaggle out of the sticks would be your last one [24:13] before your baby. Back in 2024, when the president had the attempt on his life in Butler, you cut your [24:19] maternity leave short back then. You're obviously back here today after Saturday. Can you just elaborate [24:24] a little bit why you felt it was important to be here to bring to the media and talk to the American [24:29] people from the stand? Sure. It's sort of crazy timing when you put it that way for both children [24:35] with two assassination attempts against the president. I'm honored to work in this job. I view this job as the [24:42] president's spokesperson and the White House spokeswoman as public service. It's not just any job. [24:47] I'm honored to do it. And I'm honored to work and speak on behalf of President Trump, who has faced [24:52] unprecedented adversity and challenges. And I'm honored to work for him. And again, as I witnessed [24:59] on Saturday night, just his dogged resolve and determination to get back onto the stage. And he was [25:05] pushing secret service and law enforcement to allow him to address. And that that really, I think, hopefully [25:11] gives the country the type of strength that we need. And I certainly know as his spokeswoman, [25:16] and I can speak on behalf of all of the staff here at the White House, the president inspires all of [25:20] us to just keep going and keep fighting every day. Thanks, Daniel. And congrats to you on your new baby. [25:26] He's beautiful. Aisha. Just from the rhetoric, you mentioned the First Lady and Jimmy Kimmel. [25:31] Jimmy Kimmel's comments were, Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow. And he said this days [25:38] before the shooting. But there does seem to be a normalization of rhetoric about assassinating [25:46] this particular president. How can this administration try to put an end to this? [25:53] Well, I think you heard it directly from the president on Saturday night, Aisha, that in his [25:58] words, we need to recommit ourselves as a country to toning down the rhetoric and to unifying around [26:05] what makes our country great. That's true of everyone who works in this White House. But as I [26:10] said, it's also true of everyone who has a voice and a platform across this country, whether you're on [26:16] television, a podcast host, you know, people listen. And when you have mentally disturbed individuals [26:23] across the country who are listening to this crazed rhetoric about the president day after day after [26:29] day, it inspires them to do crazy things. And unfortunately, it's not just the media. It is [26:35] the entire Democrat Party has made their pitch to voters across the country that Donald Trump poses [26:42] an existential threat to democracy, that he is a fascist, and that they compare him to Hitler. [26:47] I mean, these are despicable statements that the American people have been consuming for years. [26:51] And so many mentally perturbed individuals are led to believe these words are truth [26:56] and then are inspired to act on it. I have a whole host of examples that we can share with you [27:02] after it is pages and pages of major Democrat Party elected officials saying such as Rep. Hakeem [27:09] Jeffries just this April this month said we are in an era of maximum warfare everywhere all the time. [27:16] Governor Josh Shapiro said heads need to roll within the administration. Senator Alex Padilla said people [27:23] are, quote, dying because of fear and terror caused by the Trump administration. Senator Elizabeth [27:28] Warren, President Trump is making the country look like a, quote, fascist state. Senator Adam Schiff [27:34] saying President Trump using a dictator playbook. Senator Ed Markey calling President Trump a dictator, [27:40] saying that this administration's actions are authoritarianism on steroids. Governor J.B. [27:45] Pritzker, never before in my life have I called for mass protest disruptions. [27:49] These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace. You have Rep. Presley saying we'll see you in the [27:55] streets. Monica McIver, a Democrat representative on Capitol Hill, we will not take this [28:01] shit from Donald Trump. He thinks he's a dictator. We are at war. These are Democrat elected officials [28:08] calling for war against the president of the United States and his supporters. I could go on and on. But [28:13] again, when you have people in positions of power that are saying things like this every single day for [28:19] years, you are inspiring violence by people who are already mentally ill. And that's what we've [28:24] seen against this president for far too long. The Press is disinformation and misinformation online. [28:30] There will be bite-sized clips that will go viral to the point where there are Americans in this [28:35] country that believe that what happened Saturday night was staged. How does this White House tackle [28:42] that with social media companies out there, whether it's X, Facebook, Instagram, how do they work with [28:48] these companies to make sure that doesn't get out of control? Ms. It's certainly a good question, [28:52] Aisha. I don't have tangible answers for you on what we're doing with social media companies, [28:57] if anything at all. What I will say is it's very important to us that we get the truth and the facts [29:03] about this case in any case out there as quickly as possible to dispel some of that crazy nonsense [29:08] that you do see running rampant online. And I think the Department of Justice and the FBI thus far [29:15] have done a good job of disseminating the truth and the facts about this alleged attempted assassin, [29:21] the perpetrator in this case. And I understand he'll be arraigned in court very soon. You all see [29:26] that. And the Department of Justice will be giving a briefing and an update later today. So as far as we're [29:31] concerned, just providing maximum transparency. And hopefully people will believe the truth [29:37] rather than the lies and the conspiracies that so often do go crazy on social media. [29:41] The Press, Caroline. [29:42] Ms. Rachel. [29:43] The Press, Caroline. Does the administration view this as a security failure or did the [29:47] protocols work as they were designed? Ms. The President has said he believes that [29:51] the protocols worked. Again, you had a perpetrator who tried to breach the security parameter that was [29:57] set up by Secret Service. And he was running as fast as he could and was immediately neutralized [30:03] moments later. And again, having been right up there on the stage with the President and the First [30:07] Lady, I can tell you it was seconds before we were told to get down. And it was seconds before we found [30:13] ourselves in the holdroom backstage. It all happened literally within a matter of seconds. The President, [30:19] the Vice President and the First Lady being pulled to safety. That is not done if there's a lapse. So [30:26] Secret Service did their jobs well. They communicated with one another to remove the [30:29] President and the Vice President to safety as quickly as they could and obviously to neutralize [30:34] the shooter as well. And thank God they did, because if that man was allowed into that ballroom, [30:38] it would have been a much different scene. And just one more follow-up on just how the White House [30:42] could be rethinking security protocols going forward. I mean, we all remember after the attempted [30:47] assassination in Butler, there were indoor rallies that were held after that. Is that out of the [30:53] question changing any additional security protocols when it comes to how the President [30:58] does these events that are outside of the White House? I definitely wouldn't say changes are out of [31:03] the question. I think, again, that it's up to the White House here and we view it as a great [31:07] responsibility to ensure the maximum safety of the President and the Vice President and the entire [31:12] Cabinet. And so we're always looking for ways to improve security. I think if you just sit here and say [31:17] everything is perfect all the time, that's not a good way to operate. And so the White House will continue to [31:22] engage with DHS and with Secret Service, to find ways to improve and strengthen security. But as far as [31:27] Saturday night is concerned, the President was satisfied with the response. And he's very grateful to [31:31] the men and women who provided the response for him and his wife and members of his team. [31:36] The Press. Thanks, Caroline. The President has talked about rescheduling the dinner within 30 days. [31:44] Does he have a specific venue in mind? And would he consider hosting it at the White House? [31:48] Well, unfortunately, we don't have a room big enough here at the White House, [31:52] which is another point to be made. And the President is absolutely right. It's why [31:57] the White House Ballroom Project is not just a fun project for President Trump, [32:02] like you will read in the media. It is actually critical for our national security that a larger, [32:07] secure building on this complex, which is the most secure complex in the world, [32:12] is built to accommodate not only large amounts of guests, but also the President, the Vice President, [32:18] members of the Cabinet. The line of secession in this country should be able to gather freely and [32:23] safety without the fear of threats or political violence. And the White House Ballroom will provide [32:29] that. And so it's critical that we get this project done as quickly as possible. [32:33] Thank you, Caroline. Two questions, if that's all right. First, on the security situation on Saturday, [32:41] kind of a follow-up here. Previous administrations have sent both the President and the Vice [32:46] President to the dinner. But after the foiled attack on Saturday, if the dinner is rescheduled, [32:53] would President Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance both plan on attending? And is it wise to have [33:00] both of them in the same spot given the presidential line of succession that you mentioned a second ago? [33:07] It's definitely a good question. And I know that it's one that will be raised. I can assure you [33:11] the President intends to attend the event, as he has told all of you publicly. I don't want to rule [33:16] in or out the Vice President's attendance, but certainly that's a conversation that will take place. [33:20] And the Iran has proposed a mutual reopening of the Strait, leaving the nuclear discussion [33:28] for later in the process. Given that the nuclear program has been a red line for this administration, [33:34] would the President agree to that kind of phased negotiation? [33:38] Well, only because it's been reported, I will confirm the President has met with his national [33:43] security team this morning. The meeting may be ongoing, maybe not. I don't want to [33:46] speak affirmatively because I was prepping to come out here. But the proposal was being discussed. [33:52] I don't want to get ahead of the President or his national security team. What I will reiterate [33:57] is that the President's red lines with respect to Iran have been made very, very clear, [34:01] not just to the American public, but also to them as well. [34:04] So they're considering it? [34:05] I wouldn't say they're considering it. I would just say that there was a discussion [34:09] this morning that I don't want to get ahead of. And you'll hear directly from the President, [34:12] I'm sure, on this topic very soon. [34:14] What's the President's red lines? [34:15] I'm going to ask you about the Fed Chairman. But first, three assassination attempts in three years. [34:20] Is this going to change the type of events that the President goes to? [34:23] Well, again, that's going to be part of the conversations moving forward. But as you heard [34:28] from President Trump, he does not want these deranged lunatics and these grave acts of political [34:36] violence to change our American way of life. And I think it's a very brave thing for him to say. [34:40] It'd be very easy for him to just hunker down here at the White House where he knows he's safe. [34:44] But the President wants to be out across the country. He wants to go across the country to meet with [34:50] Americans. He wants to celebrate the 250th birthday of our nation's anniversary this summer. [34:55] As you know, we're gearing up for a big UFC fight here on the South Lawn. So there's many exciting [35:00] events. I know the President wants to be part of and will be part of moving forward. He's undeterred [35:06] in that way. And it's something that inspires all of us here to keep going. [35:09] The Press. Senator Tillis is now dropping his objection to allowing Kevin Warsh to be confirmed [35:15] because the DOJ has closed their investigation. Is the President satisfied that an Inspector [35:20] General report into the Federal Reserve is enough to look into these renovations? [35:25] The President understands that the Inspector General has greater tools at their disposal, [35:30] perhaps even more powerful than a grand jury, to continue investigating the financial mismanagement [35:35] of the Fed building, which is a priority for the President. Look, he's a builder himself. When he sees [35:40] something has a lot of cost overruns, is taking too long, and is this case ripping off the [35:44] American taxpayer? He wants to get to the bottom of it. I understand Senator Tillis put out a [35:49] statement saying he'll support Kevin Warsh's confirmation. That has been our position all [35:54] along from day one. He is more than qualified for the job, and we look forward to working with the [35:58] Senate on his swift confirmation process. Megan. [36:01] As a follow-up on Warsh, will the President be satisfied once the Fed's Inspector General [36:05] finishes that investigation, even if it finds no evidence of wrongdoing? [36:09] Well, that's a hypothetical question. I'll let the President speak on it when we see the results. [36:13] It's obviously far too early to say. And, Harley, as a follow-up, now that it [36:16] looks like Warsh will be confirmed by the end of Jay Powell's term, does the President, [36:20] is he still considering firing Jay Powell if he stays on as governor after that? [36:24] I haven't talked to him about it specifically, but I think the President will be satisfied [36:28] once Kevin Warsh is confirmed as the Fed Chair, which he should be. [36:31] On Iran, the President had said last week that the U.S. has started the process of clearing the [36:38] Strait of Hormuz of mines. Do you have an update on how many have been removed and an estimate of [36:43] how long that process could take? I don't, but I would defer you to the Pentagon on that. We'll [36:47] make sure they get you an answer, Karen. The Press is an ongoing process, though. [36:50] It's still actually happening right now? Again, I would defer you to the Pentagon on [36:54] anything with respect to clearing mines in the Strait of Hormuz. [36:56] I know that you said that the White House is reviewing the security protocols for things [37:04] that could be done differently in the future. Have you identified anything so far that you would [37:09] like to see done differently or asked the Secret Service to make any changes in the security protocols [37:14] for the President, particularly at these large events that are taking place off the White House [37:18] campus? Not yet, no. But as I said, there will be a meeting here at the White House [37:23] in the earlier half of this week. So those conversations will take place. [37:26] And on the line of succession? And I would also just add, you know, [37:29] look, the Secret Service does not detail their procedures or operations to the public for obvious [37:35] reasons, because you have crazy people who try to hijack them and get around them. So these [37:39] conversations will take place in private. But if adjustments need to be made to protect the [37:44] President, they will be made. And on the line of succession, the White House discussed [37:48] doing like it does, for instance, with a joint address to Congress for these large events [37:52] and designating someone as the designated survivor for future large events that the Cabinet attends. [37:57] Well, those conversations ahead of the Walk of Dinner did take place. But there were several [38:01] members of the Cabinet in the line of succession who did not attend for various personal reasons. [38:07] So designating one survivor was not necessary, as we had several members who were not there already. [38:12] Carol, I want to be forced to dive under tables and fearing for their lives on Saturday night, [38:16] including many of the people in this room, myself included. What is the President's message [38:20] to those people who experienced that terrible trauma and maybe are still fearful today? [38:26] I think he would say, as he sort of did on Saturday night, coming in here in his tuxedo, [38:32] you know, we can't allow these crazy people to let us be afraid. We have to keep moving forward, [38:37] showing up, doing our jobs, celebrating our country, and doing what we know is right. [38:42] But certainly we'd like to see the rhetoric against this President and his supporters toned down, [38:47] because it is inspiring these crazy people across the country to target not just the President, [38:52] but those who work for him and those who support him. And it must end. [38:55] Is he following the arraignment of the suspect today? [38:58] Yes, he is. And I know you all want to follow that, too. So it's happening in a few minutes. [39:01] So I'll let you all go. The Department of Justice is also going to be speaking, [39:06] momentarily following the arraignment. And I hope that, pray that this is the last time I speak to you [39:12] for some time until after my maternity leave. So thank you guys. [39:21] There you have it. That was White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt there, [39:29] addressing members of the media following the shooting at the White House Correspondents [39:34] Dinner on Saturday evening. You just heard Miss Levitt there at the end, referencing that she hopes [39:39] that this is the last time she is talking to the pool of press. She was supposed to go on maternity [39:44] leave on Friday. She said that that was gonna be her last time addressing members of the press for [39:48] the for some while. But then obviously is back here today following the events of the past weekend. [39:55] Earlier in our YouTube stream here, we had a viewer Stacy Cherry 4716 asking who will take Caroline's [40:03] job when she is done. Thank you so much, Miss Stacy Cherry for tuning in and commenting with that [40:09] question. Caroline Levitt told reporters a variety of administration officials will handle her official [40:16] briefing duties and Fox is reporting that that includes Vice President J.D. Vance or potentially [40:22] even President Trump himself. Okay, this has been a Live Now from Fox YouTube presentation. I'm Adam [40:29] Lorenz. Thank you so much for tuning in and we're going to leave you right now on a shot of the White House. [40:35] You can tune in to Live Now from Fox 24-7 wherever you get your local news. Take care.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →