About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Transportation Secretary Duffy testifies on department budget before House subcommittee from PBS NewsHour, published May 21, 2026. The transcript contains 19,731 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"when all is said and done today this subcommittee welcomes the honorable sean duffy secretary the department of transportation to testify for the fiscal 27 budget secretary duffy it's good to see you thank you for appearing before us today the president's request for dot is 26.8 billion in..."
[0:00] when all is said and done today this subcommittee welcomes the honorable sean duffy secretary the
[0:08] department of transportation to testify for the fiscal 27 budget secretary duffy it's good to see
[0:14] you thank you for appearing before us today the president's request for dot is 26.8 billion in
[0:22] discretionary budget authority for fiscal 27 this amount includes an increase for air traffic
[0:28] operations to continue efforts to hire controllers and other safety personnel another installment for
[0:35] air traffic modernization and new investments in ports shipyards and rail safety we're going to hear
[0:41] a lot about that today this is the first year without advance appropriations from the iija
[0:48] which totaled 184 billion for the department from 2022 to 2026. i appreciate your efforts
[0:56] the efforts of your department to move things forward since you were in front of this subcommittee
[1:01] last the obligation rate for the iija division j dollars has increased from 39 to 51 percent in the
[1:11] past year the backlog of 3200 grants has all but been eliminated we appreciate that effort and would
[1:18] remind you of the requirements set forth in the fiscal 26 law regarding proper execution of programs
[1:24] appropriated by this committee along with new congressional notification requirements
[1:30] our hearing today serves as an example of the reciprocal relationship between this committee
[1:34] and the executive branch to ensure the appropriate resources are provided to dot to meet our shared
[1:41] goals of safety infrastructure improvements and modernization of our transportation systems
[1:47] the investments we've made together in air traffic control prove this concept funding to
[1:51] rebuild the controller workforce combined with long overdue modernization of air traffic technologies
[1:58] reflects the kind of sustained bipartisan commitment that a safety critical mission demands this work
[2:05] is far from finished and the challenges ahead are significant the progress we've made shows what's possible
[2:12] when congress and the department focus on common priorities and follow through with real resources as we look
[2:20] to fiscal 27 we know more needs to be done for the seas we need to ramp up our investments in the nation's maritime
[2:27] workforce and infrastructure to ensure we have the commercial competency to compete globally this will
[2:34] also support our national defense capability in the indopacom region and elsewhere for our surface
[2:40] transportation infrastructure we're on the precipice of a reset following the expiration of the iija how we build
[2:48] upon what worked and how we course correct from those investments that were serving political pipe dreams
[2:55] is the key question in my opinion for fiscal 27. i look forward to seeing what our authorizing counterparts
[3:01] put forward they're in the process of doing that as we speak and we stand at the ready on the appropriations
[3:08] committee to cut the check when the time comes i should be clear however that this committee has the sole
[3:14] jurisdiction on discretionary funding efforts to recreate the advanced appropriations of the iija
[3:21] are ill-founded and not to be contemplated without the full involvement and deliberation
[3:27] of this committee the invite remains mr secretary to come down to arkansas's third district and see how
[3:33] the investments of your department are flowing into communities like mine the department is a unique
[3:38] department in that way as the impact of your work is seen in every single congressional district
[3:45] as such this committee enjoys a history of bipartisanship and i look forward to continuing
[3:51] as we begin the fiscal 27 process speaking of which i'd like now to recognize my dear friend and
[3:57] the ranking member of this subcommittee mr cliburn of south carolina for any opening remarks he prefers to
[4:05] make i now recognize the gentleman from south carolina for that purpose thank you very much mr chairman welcome
[4:11] back for mr secretary dot's primary mission is to invest in solutions that improve transportation
[4:20] safety this includes safer transportation in our skies on our rails in our ports and over and under our
[4:30] bridges according to the american road and transportation builders association there are more than 9 500 bridges
[4:38] across my home state of south carolina and more than 2 130 of them are in disrepair to make matters worse
[4:49] now that 600 bridges are structurally deficient a number that has grown over the last three years
[4:58] as you might be aware south carolina is the fastest growing state in the nation this means that as we
[5:06] welcome more people and businesses there will be more wear and tear on our roads and bridges at the same time
[5:16] south carolina ranks among the highest for fatalities on our highways according to the insurance institute
[5:24] of highway safety in one year alone 2023 my home state has seen more than 1 000 fatality fatalities
[5:35] on our roads including in rural areas which face unique safety challenges and this is not unique to south
[5:45] carolina in fact the american society of civil engineering gives the united states infrastructure
[5:53] a c grade although an improvement from c minus which it was before it is in part attributable to the major
[6:03] investments enacted by this body the bipartisan infrastructure law made a historic five-year investment
[6:12] in our nation's transportation systems whether it is helping to repair deficient bridges or improve our
[6:19] ports these investment investments are intended to enhance safety employ american businesses put more people to
[6:28] work and create new uh private uh public partnerships i am pleased that our colleagues in the house
[6:39] transportation infrastructure committee have begun their work to reauthorize so many of the programs
[6:47] important to our districts however i am concerned that the committee this committee is not at the table
[6:55] uh to support another tranche of much-needed supplemental advanced appropriations as you are aware the bipartisan
[7:05] infrastructure law included an additional 36.8 billion annually over its five-year span to help meet our
[7:15] transportation infrastructure needs unfortunately no new supplemental funding will be available beyond september 30th
[7:24] of this year i implore my republican colleagues and you mr secretary to impress upon our leadership and the white house
[7:33] to help ensure that this committee continues to help close the gap on transportation projects across the
[7:41] country i believe this subcommittee can work in a bipartisan fashion to deliver safer transportation networks
[7:50] for the american people and i look forward to hearing from you mr secretary about how
[7:56] we can best use america's resources and talents to build a safer more secure country now with that
[8:06] said mr secretary i would be remiss if i did not raise on this panel today my concern with your great
[8:13] american road trip while i agree with the importance of having boots on the ground so to speak to learn
[8:20] more about the complexities of our transportation and travel needs across the country it's important to
[8:26] keep in mind the millions of struggling tax-paying americans who are not afforded the same opportunities my
[8:35] hope is that as you're moving around the country you will include some roads less traveled now while i do not
[8:44] argue with robert frost i believe that what really makes the differences in our lives are the people we
[8:53] encounter during our travels irrespective of which road one might take it is my collective duty our
[9:04] collective duty to make america's greatness accessible and affordable for all not just some and with that
[9:13] mr chairman i'll give back thank you mr clibbert and at the risk of patronizing the overall chairman let me
[9:22] just say as i said earlier today reimagining the appropriations process for this congress has been
[9:30] a challenge for a number of years dating all the way back to the time mr secretary that you were serving
[9:35] in this great body this guy to my right that's about to speak deserves a lot of credit for moving us toward
[9:44] a much more perfect and meaningful process he's done it skillfully he's done it very patiently and against
[9:52] great odds and i want the public to know how grateful i am and how grateful this committee is
[9:58] for the work of our overall chairman mr tom cole of oklahoma you're recognized sir for five minutes
[10:06] thank you for that very generous and fulton praise but i can tell you any success i had wouldn't happen
[10:11] without my friend the ranking member uh because this is a bipartisan exercise and appropriation it always is
[10:18] and i'm particularly proud of this subcommittee because of the bipartisanship that exists between
[10:23] this chairman and its ranking member and how well they've worked together uh so thank all of you and
[10:29] thank all the other members for being here secretary duffy welcome to back to thud uh thank you so much
[10:36] for appearing before this subcommittee again and for your continued leadership and service i particularly
[10:42] want to commend you for your commitment to modernizing our air traffic control system upgrading aging
[10:48] air traffic control infrastructure is long overdue and your leadership and urgency on this issue
[10:54] are exactly what is needed as we move through fiscal year 2027 i remain focused on maintaining
[11:02] responsible investments in our nation's transportation system as chairman warmack has already stated your
[11:09] team has already made exceptional efforts to ensure that we're investing taxpayer money
[11:16] in infrastructure and safety uh improvements that are worthwhile taking a hard look at thousands of funding
[11:23] decisions to make sure they deliver real results for the american people you're to be commended for that
[11:29] the subcommittee furthered these efforts in the fy 2027 bill uh under chairman womack and ranking
[11:36] member vibran's leadership supporting programs that improve infrastructure while scrutinizing those that are
[11:43] wasteful and duplicative uh but make no mistake we've not uh sacrificed dot safety mission in that
[11:50] process over the past three fiscal years this subcommittee has made the hiring and training of new air
[11:56] traffic controllers a top priority in our fy 27 bill we're supporting 2300 new controller candidates on top of
[12:05] the 2500 we funded in fy 26 reflecting the committee's commitment to rebuilding the controller workforce
[12:13] that keeps our skies safe and the economy moving i also want to recognize your personal interest
[12:20] and support for the mike monrone center in oklahoma city and your determination to supercharge
[12:26] controller hiring across the board that attention has made a real difference and it reflects a genuine
[12:32] understanding of what this facility means to the safety of our entire aviation system we have the land the
[12:39] facilities world-class staff in oklahoma city to ensure that controllers receive in-person focus and
[12:47] state-of-the-art training i'll continue to fight for the funding that this center needs to modernize and
[12:53] expand and i'll frankly put push back any efforts to decentralize or weaken what we've built there
[12:59] this commitment extends beyond controllers alone aviation safety depends on a full complement of qualified
[13:07] safety personnel across the faa i will also reiterate my steadfast commitment to prioritize investments
[13:15] in tribal and rural areas and the fy 27 bill under mr womack's leadership demonstrates that commitment
[13:23] nearly 70 percent of america's road miles are in rural areas and about 145 000 of those miles are on roads
[13:31] that pass through tribal lands these communities face notable challenges and have different needs
[13:38] from urban areas as we move through the appropriations process i look forward to working with my
[13:43] colleagues on both sides of the aisle to fund the critical safety missions and transportation
[13:48] infrastructure needs of the country with that again thank you chairman warmack for this hearing and
[13:54] thank you secretary duffy for appearing before it i thank the chairman and what i said about mr cole goes for
[14:01] the ranking member as well mr laura of connecticut um it is a true partnership and we're grateful for
[14:08] your leadership as well ma'am and i recognize you for five minutes thank you very much mr chairman and it
[14:13] is an honor for me to work with both you and and ranking member cliburn to work with you and chairman cole
[14:21] as we make sure that the appropriations process is as strong as it needs to be and that it is
[14:29] um really where the power of the purse resides and thank you very much um uh thank you uh mr secretary
[14:38] for testifying today we look forward to your testimony and to uh hearing your answers to our
[14:44] questions uh america's transportation infrastructure is crucial it's crucial to the economic health of our
[14:49] country it connects communities expands prosperity extends opportunities to people across this country from
[14:55] big cities to small towns unfortunately the president's budget request proposes substantial cuts
[15:01] to many of the programs and initiatives that americans rely on the budget proposes to cut 327 million
[15:08] dollars from amtrak including 200 million from the northeast corridor and 127 million from the national
[15:15] network amtrak is crucial to my home state of connecticut where nearly 1 000 of their employees are based
[15:22] more than 2 million travelers were served by amtrak in connecticut um in 2025 and they facilitate an
[15:30] incalculable quantity of economic activity uh investing in this service they provide is essential
[15:37] for supporting so many of my constituents so i'm disappointed to see um such steep cuts proposed
[15:44] in the president's budget it's crucial that this administration restore americans faith in the safety
[15:50] and security of air travel following a series of tragic incidents last year i understand the faa
[15:58] i understand that the faa recently revised downward their projections for necessary air traffic
[16:05] controllers the staffing levels to maintain safe skies by roughly 2 000 positions and as we approach
[16:12] some of the busiest travel months of the year the administration needs to do everything it can to
[16:17] provide the american people with the assurance that they will be safe in our skies we didn't we need
[16:23] to know what is needed as appropriations committee to be able to provide the resources needed to keep
[16:29] people uh safe uh to keep our aircraft moving making the airspace more efficient the american people are
[16:39] struggling every day with the rising cost of living and robust transportation infrastructure is key
[16:46] to connecting people with the well-paying jobs that they need to stay afloat transportation i think
[16:52] we all concur is an economic engine and our investment in it must meet the needs that the american people
[16:58] face so secretary duffy uh i look forward to your testimony today and i look forward to the uh
[17:05] interaction with our our questions and answers thank you and i yield back thank you mr duffy your uh full
[17:12] written statement will be included in the record and at this time i recognize you for five minutes
[17:17] to summarize your remarks uh chairman womack chairman cole uh chairman rogers as well uh ranking member
[17:24] cliburn and uh delauro thank you for having me it's good to be back in the house uh it's great to have
[17:30] such wonderful attendance even though you guys are supposed to be gassed you're all here it's great for me
[17:35] um i i i hope today we do have a chance to talk about what mr cliburn uh mentioned about the the bridges
[17:42] uh it's an issue um and you also mentioned and we all know this that our infrastructure has a c rating
[17:48] and i think as we sit here together um this is probably the most bipartisan place in this whole
[17:55] body uh we all work together because there is not a republican road or a democrat bridge
[18:01] there's not a republican safe airport or a democrat safe airport it's we are all in this together as
[18:06] one american family and doing this together um i think is is critically important and uh chairman
[18:13] cole i would agree with you on travel lands as well making sure that is not forgotten uh in rural places
[18:19] like where i come from uh the road less traveled um is one that i have been on for a very long time
[18:24] so uh to the committee thank you for having me and again it's good to be back uh in the house
[18:30] for the past 16 months with your support the department of transportation has been hard at work
[18:34] uh delivering wins for the american people we have a once in a generation opportunity to revitalize
[18:41] the critical infrastructure that millions of americans rely on every single day from our runways
[18:47] to our roads to our railroads we have upgraded our national infrastructure invested in the backbone
[18:53] of our economy and made life safer for american families we are aggressively moving to clear the
[18:59] backlog of 3200 grants that were left behind in the last administration our goal is
[19:05] simple to ensure that these grants deliver safe enduring infrastructure that will serve americans
[19:12] for generations to come at the faa we have kick-started a historic overhaul of our air traffic control
[19:19] system this admitted this has been possible because of this congress and i'm grateful for that
[19:25] thanks to the working families tax cut act we received 12.5 billion dollars as a down payment
[19:31] to begin deploying state-of-the-art equipment across our airports and nas and that work is underway we
[19:38] replaced 50 percent of legacy copper wiring converted 278 radio sites installed 58 new surface awareness
[19:47] systems and transitioned 17 towers to electronic flight strips but technology is nothing without people
[19:55] we need the people our air traffic controllers so since march we've hired a record-breaking 2400 air traffic
[20:01] controllers and we had an innovative gamer uh campaign we realized at the academy as we
[20:08] surveyed the the the the students uh out of 250 surveyed uh all of them but three are gamers
[20:17] and so we made a pitch to the the gamers by the way they have multiple screens um they're problem solving
[20:22] and they're talking at the same time we received over 12 000 applications in 24 hours to be an air traffic
[20:29] controller it was it was quite historic um we smashed the old records it was a great ad campaign um
[20:35] and uh but it's it is truly bringing in the best and the brightest who want to serve their country and
[20:40] and they're concerned about safety and i think these are the young men and women we're bringing into this
[20:45] field that is so important we're also restoring integrity and safety to the american trucking industry
[20:51] it was a policy of the last administration to allow for unqualified foreign drivers to get behind the
[20:58] wheel of a truck those days are no more we just saw an incident in california a couple days ago maybe
[21:04] it was yesterday um i think we all have to work together to have the right policy in place to make
[21:08] sure that our roads are safe and what should that policy look like i have my ideas on what we need to do
[21:14] together we've worked with states to cancel 28 000 illegally issued licenses for unqualified foreign
[21:21] drivers and we're holding um some states that aren't cooperating accountable we all need to follow the same
[21:28] rules we've also knocked more than 20 000 drivers out of service for failing to meet basic requirements
[21:34] like reading our road signs or being able to communicate with law enforcement these changes
[21:40] aren't just keeping you and your family safe on the road they have added benefits to boosting wages for
[21:46] the great american truckers who serve our communities every single day our commitment to historic safety
[21:52] standards is already delivering historic results um in 2025 we successfully reduced roadway deaths
[22:01] by 6.7 percent across the nation mr cliburn i'd be happy to talk to you more about what's happening
[22:06] in south carolina but the numbers nationally have come down and that is a good thing this is the fifth
[22:12] largest drop in roadway deaths uh in the history of dot so we're making progress we have a long way to go
[22:19] um we're at you know 36 000 plus deaths a year still way too many uh but we're making progress we're
[22:25] going in the right direction we're working on our freedom to drive initiative working on bottlenecks
[22:31] um across the country making sure we can alleviate uh traffic snares um i'm going to try to move through
[22:39] this uh quickly but i want to talk uh about um what we're doing uh collaboratively with states to
[22:46] finally make transit safe and clean and dependable i'm a republican and i recognize that our states
[22:52] do not work our cities not our states our cities don't work if we don't have good transit systems
[22:58] but i do think we should expect from those systems that they are clean that they're safe
[23:04] the people want to ride them you should have your well i have a your 16 year old daughter should be
[23:09] able to take um the subway or the transit system at seven o'clock at night on a saturday and if we
[23:16] don't hit that standard we have work to do together to make sure that is the bar is high for us to
[23:21] make sure that people want to ride and they can ride and they can safely ride because a lot of people
[23:25] can't afford to ride other forms of transportation so i think we owe it to our uh fellow brothers and
[23:32] sisters i i would like to just mention before i turn it back to you mr chairman i would at one point
[23:38] like to talk about the merchant marine academy uh for those of you who've been there um that's wonderful if
[23:44] if you haven't been i'd ask you to go these are some of the most amazing young men and women um have
[23:50] such great heart and this their academy was built in the 1940s after world war ii and um it's as a
[23:59] service academy as americans i don't i don't think our our young men and women deserve to have um the
[24:05] buildings the heating systems the lack of dishwashers um i believe that either we have to invest in this
[24:12] academy um and in these young people or um i don't want i love i love i love that i have it and you
[24:19] have it on this committee but if we're not going to make the investments you got to shut it down
[24:24] maybe you got to give it to the navy and i don't want you to do that but we we can't let these kids
[24:30] american men and women in this academy have this kind of infrastructure we can't and because we let
[24:37] it go for so long it's going to take a lot of money and that's the decision that you all have to make
[24:42] but i'll i'll plead with you because if you haven't been there go see it and and and talk to the
[24:48] midshipmen and you'll be heartened to see the men and women that want to serve this country and be
[24:53] mariners so i've gone way over mr chairman i apologize for that i'm looking forward to your
[24:58] questions and uh thanks for having me again i thank you mr secretary and on the subject of the merchant
[25:03] marine academy there's a couple of kids from my hometown in rogers it will be incoming freshman
[25:08] class of 2030 so you have my commitment to visit the merchant marine academy thank you we owe that
[25:16] to you we have um typically start with the the leadership of the subcommittee but today i'm going
[25:24] to yield first to mr shreve of indiana he is performing double duty today not only is he a member of this
[25:31] subcommittee but he's also engaged in the markup on tni on the surface transportation bill and so at this
[25:38] time i'm going to recognize mr shreve for any questions he may have you're recognized for five
[25:44] minutes sir uh mr uh chairman thank you very much i appreciate this privilege uh mr secretary thank you
[25:51] uh for appearing uh before us thank you for spending some time in my state looking at a bridge project
[25:57] and and many other things i am the newest member of this subcommittee so this is a particular uh privilege
[26:02] uh and i serve on uh tni where we're obviously wrestling with the uh surface reauthorization
[26:10] today and so there's a lot going on two floors down i'm looking at this as a new member but through the
[26:16] lens of both the appropriator and an authorizer i am from indianapolis where we met last time my district
[26:24] runs south and east uh our motto back home is we're the crossroads of america and that's not just a
[26:30] slogan indianapolis my district includes material portions of i-65 i-70 i-74 i-69 i've got parts of i-465
[26:41] we're a major short line uh rail state we're talking a little bit about rail safety uh today and and
[26:48] beyond two floors down the indianapolis international airports in my district it is the top ranked mid-sized
[26:55] airport in our country and it's the home to the second largest fedex air hub so there's there there's
[27:00] my uh my my pitch for indiana's sixth district hoosiers know how to move freight and we also know
[27:06] what happens when the system fails in recent years hoosier families have suffered tragedies involving
[27:12] commercial drivers who should not have been behind the wheel of 80 000 uh uh pound rigs secretary duffy you
[27:19] have taken steps at your department including stronger english language enforcement for commercial
[27:26] drivers and broader push to remove unsafe drivers from our highways i want to focus on what congress
[27:33] our congress can do to help you finish the job our protections are only as strong as the systems
[27:38] we rely upon that's why i'm co-leading legislation to modernize dhs's save system so immigration status
[27:46] checks to non-domiciled cdls come back currently and quickly indiana has been cracking down since
[27:53] april 1st just since april 1st our state has revoked 1800 non-domiciled domiciled cdls what else does this
[28:01] congress need to codify or fund to help your department and fm csa keep ineligible and unsafe drivers
[28:11] off of our roads thank you congressman not bad at freight and okay basketball um in indiana and i
[28:20] appreciate your work on the on the save act that's uh that's important on the save um uh system so
[28:26] here's i want to to to be clear to everybody on the committee uh the issues we've had with commercial
[28:33] driver's licenses um has been a nationwide problem there's not a difference between a democrat state
[28:40] and republican state alike all the states uh perform poorly meaning they're they're giving uh
[28:47] commercial driver's licenses to uh people who maybe should not have been in the country at all they
[28:53] were illegal um or others who had come into the country in the last four years and they were given
[29:00] a driver's license for way longer than their work permit and so we've now modified the rules and um
[29:07] we're not allowing for the new rules on commercial driver's licenses to operate that way anymore
[29:13] one of the problems we have though is i don't have the authority to retroactively look at the
[29:19] all the thousands tens of thousands of commercial driver's licenses that were previously issued
[29:25] and and encourage or incentivize states to take those drivers off uh the road and just one of the
[29:32] issues at play here is for an american truck driver to get a commercial driver's license we look at
[29:37] their record what do they have drunk drivings do they have speedings like who are they as a driver
[29:42] we'll look at their criminal records so we get a full purview into who these men and women are that
[29:47] are going to buy the uh drive these 80 000 pound rigs when we've had people come into the country
[29:53] recently it's very challenging for us to look at their records and so we don't know who they are what
[29:58] is their driving record and i think that's creating some risk to the system and if you're going to church
[30:03] or you're going to walmart um you should be safe these should be the best drivers on the road
[30:08] not um some of the ones that are killing our families so i'm i'm hearing that you don't have the
[30:14] data sharing tools or all those tools that that your department needs i don't i don't have all the
[30:18] authority that i need and i would like to work with this committee in a bipartisan way to to talk about
[30:23] what should it look like what should the rules be um and look forward and look back i appreciate that
[30:29] that can i can i mention one other thing we just launched the modus um system where we have a lot
[30:33] of these chameleon carriers and they are um you'll have one address that has a 100 or 150 trucking
[30:41] companies at one p.o box or one address and just you guys see this across across the spectrum the
[30:49] technology is old yeah and we have a hard time dissecting the tech the the all the information so
[30:55] modus has come out a new software system that's allowing us to actually have purview you can't
[31:00] have a hundred or ten or five trucking companies from um in one p.o box that's that'll that'll be a
[31:09] sign of fraud we should also have a conversation of do we want foreign operators in eastern europe or
[31:15] somewhere else to own trucking companies in the u.s and have a hundred trucking companies we're seeing
[31:21] some fraud with that as well we could work together on tightening it tighten up those rules that will
[31:26] drive the safety and and reduce fraud mr secretary i would love to delve deeper into the problem of
[31:30] chameleon care uh carriers but i so appreciate your indulgence uh mr chairman and i yield back thank you
[31:36] mr shrieve i'll recognize myself now for five minutes um mr secretary the the 26 t hud bill requires
[31:45] build awards to be based solely on the selection criteria in statute that criteria include the extent to
[31:50] which a project improves safety quality of life economic competitiveness state of good repair and
[31:56] cost effectiveness your fy26 build nofo issued in december includes project labor agreements as part
[32:04] of the economic competitiveness consideration for applicants but i want to talk about that for
[32:10] just a minute because i think every state that has and my staff can correct me if i'm wrong every state
[32:18] that has an anti-pla law is represented on this appropriations committee so can you walk the
[32:28] committee through your rationale to add pla preferences back into the nofo so the pla's uh option is in there
[32:37] but i believe there's 10 criteria so a state like arkansas would not be penalized at all if you have a if you're
[32:44] one of the 22 states that uh don't allow for plas there's no penalty to your state in access to the
[32:50] built grants um it's one of uh 10 factors that can be considered um in in the process so it's not
[32:57] exclusionary at all what specific analyses or procurement reviews or economic calculations has the department
[33:08] conducted to evaluate whether a pla preference is uh makes you know are economically competitive
[33:16] can you help me understand what background you have to make those determinations well we'll look at
[33:23] um we'll try we'll ask for data to be submitted information to be submitted but we we isn't you know
[33:30] this we want good good projects and projects that um we're not going to spend just a lot of money on to
[33:36] spend money we want the deliverable um and does it make economic sense as well um and so we'll uh we'll
[33:43] ask for information from uh from the project sponsor and then we'll analyze that and i'm not not to shock
[33:51] anybody but sometimes people fudge information to us um and we have to go through and suss out the truth
[33:58] of of the information that was submitted to make it a determination well i asked the question only because
[34:03] uh we want to make sure that uh non-union states like my state of arkansas can remain competitive
[34:11] and it's good to know that they're not going to be punished for having those those types of
[34:17] prohibitions finally as you know i've championed funding to address the chronic shortage of safe
[34:22] parking for american truckers our 27 bill made another installment in this priority the trucking industry
[34:29] state dot's and local communities are watching closely to see how the department moves on these
[34:33] grants this is not a single agency problem it crosses the federal highways infrastructure portfolio
[34:41] and the federal motor carrier safety administration's safety and hours of service mission it's not just
[34:47] a convenience issue tired drivers who cannot find a legal safe place to stop or a safety hazard and you
[34:53] don't have to drive america's interstates particularly at sundown to understand where these truckers are
[35:00] finding some relief they're on our exit ramps and entry ramps can you provide us with an update on the
[35:08] implementation of this program and specifically when you anticipate the release of a nofo yeah so first
[35:14] i appreciate the committee's work and making sure it was 200 million dollars for uh for truck parking and
[35:20] you're right uh you go to uh on ramp or off ramp on any freeway at sundown we have trucks uh pulled
[35:28] over they're looking for places to park sometimes spending upwards of an hour looking for a place to
[35:33] park and it becomes a safety hazard and a safety risk for other drivers but also uh for um uh those
[35:40] commercial drivers so i anticipate i believe it's either uh this week or the start of next week that nofo on
[35:47] the 200 million uh will come out and if i i do think if the uh the money comes back for a second
[35:54] round of of truck parking i do think there could be an opportunity that we could work on is there
[35:59] is there a way we could expand the money that this body gives to have a public private partnership where
[36:05] we bring in private capital to um truly expand and give us more uh parking across uh the country on our
[36:13] on our freeways in our states our federal highways and the motor carriers working on a joint framework
[36:19] on on this how these funds are going to be deployed well we've ost is uh putting out the the nofo and
[36:27] we work with all uh all the modes and we'll together work through the best uh applications there's some
[36:35] there's a there's a thought process on how we could do that and um how we should look at where we
[36:40] do it is it sporadic or is it on you know several different routes we have another installment that's
[36:45] in our bill that we marked up this morning and will be in front of the full committee in a couple
[36:49] of weeks but i want to make sure that truck parking will continue to be a priority of your administration
[36:54] and i think we're going to ask for a quick turn um off the nofo so we can make determinations and get
[37:00] those dollars out relatively quickly i thank the gentleman thank you mr cliburn thank you very much mr
[37:06] chairman mr secretary i've got a safety question that uh is a two-parter uh one involving manpower the
[37:14] other uh methods um the first one is you know we've uh spent about 96 million dollars to um hire
[37:23] new air traffic controllers and i understand that um uh there's been a sort of a new supercharged hiring
[37:33] process uh that is uh being undertaken uh but it's been called to my attention that the uh natca uh the
[37:45] air traffic controls union uh is not involved in this process at all uh could you explain why uh the
[37:55] group representing uh the employed uh were not yeah was not brought into this that's a great question
[38:03] thank you congressman for asking it um so just if you give me i'll try to be quick the historic level
[38:11] of staffing up till 2024 was the 1.87 which is what we've gone back to right now um and it was bumped
[38:21] up to a higher staffing level um for the last two years but historically that's the number that we've
[38:27] determined is a safe staffing level um to operate the national airspace but because of the disagreement
[38:33] between the faa that wanted the historic number and natca that wanted the the bigger number um you
[38:41] all told me to go to the transportation transportation research board and have the transportation research
[38:47] board independent nonpartisan look at this and tell us what's right what's the right staffing levels
[38:53] and they did come back and they've said that the staffing level that we've come out with the historic
[38:58] staffing level is the right level not the heightened one from from neck and i just by the way i do work very
[39:03] well with natca and the team and i'm grateful for the controllers and have a wonderful relationship
[39:08] with them well i i hope that that the relationship will continue because i do believe irrespective of
[39:16] what one's feeling may be about organized labor when there is a legitimate group representing employees
[39:25] uh i think uh irrespective of whether or not we follow their suggestions bringing them into the process
[39:32] uh i think it's a good thing my other question on safety is this now i understand uh that um our commitment to
[39:45] modernizing uh your efforts uh has been uh met with some uh skepticism about a fee that you talked about
[39:57] charging uh in order to uh facilitate that modernization could you tell me a little bit about this fee and
[40:06] oh no thank you that was someone had asked me a question um about how could we fund this so i would tell
[40:13] you i the 12 and a half billion that you all gave me um i'm by the way that was a leap of faith that
[40:19] was truly a leap of faith because this goes back to the next gen in early uh early 2000s we knew this
[40:25] was a problem and you all gave billions of dollars and that you never got the deliverable and so that
[40:31] you were seeing all the aviation incidents and you took a leap of faith on giving us that money i'm i'm
[40:35] grateful for but that's not enough so we're doing the infrastructure i mentioned the the telecom and
[40:40] the radios and the radars all the all all that's being done but the deliverable for the american
[40:46] people the magic for the american people is going to be the software because i think people don't
[40:50] want to be delayed they don't want to be canceled if it's a mechanical issue or it's weather like
[40:54] we can't control that but we would have more uh more airplanes commercial general evital's drones
[41:01] in the airspace and the software is a big part of it and i don't have them i keep asking for money
[41:06] uh i haven't got it yet i'd love if you all want to give it to me um but if that wasn't the case
[41:12] another option i'm just an idea factory over here if you want to charge a fee and put that on to you
[41:18] know come in and and fund this um but but i'd prefer that you all just gave me the dollars and just
[41:24] if i can make one of the clarification the way this works is that you're very strict in how i could
[41:29] spend the 12.5 billion i don't have a lot of latitude i wish i had latitude to take some of the money
[41:36] and move it towards software development i don't think we want to wait till the 12.5 billion is
[41:42] deployed and we got a better infrastructure and then you're like well then let's take another
[41:46] three years and start to develop the software like we should i think we could do it all together
[41:50] and that's right have you given us a plan of how you would do this and how much it would cost
[41:55] you i have i i think i did um i so i'm gonna ask for uh so i wanted another i originally i was at 31.5
[42:05] billion dollars you gave me 12.5 well in everyone here has a problem with a a tower in their in their
[42:13] community there's everyone calls me about their towers because they're really old i took the tower
[42:18] money out now and i'm asking for 10.2 billion i think you all are going to give me money for towers
[42:24] in your own districts because everybody has a problem because it's really old but the 10.2 gives
[42:29] us some money for the chicago um the the chicago tower and then gives us the money for um the software
[42:36] that we're going to need now i'd happy to time has expired i i would welcome to sit down and or give
[42:41] your team a call on what we want to do i'd like to know a little more about this fee sure thank you
[42:48] mr cliburn mr mr cole uh thank you very much and again mr secretary as i said in my opening mark we
[42:54] very much appreciate your focus on the mike monrone center and and getting a handle on this problem
[42:59] with the air traffic controllers how many of them we have producing i know that over many years and
[43:06] we've gotten on a high washout rate which in some ways is reassuring because it means the standards
[43:13] are high and and they're tough to meet but i know you have a particular focus on trying to improve the
[43:19] student graduation rate could you tell me a little bit about what you're doing and what kind of success
[43:24] you're having in that regard so you you bring up a good point uh the the washout rate is about 30
[43:29] percent and you we want a washout rate we don't want everyone that gets into the academy to graduate
[43:35] because you you need the best ones and the and the right ones uh 30 is too high um and so we've had
[43:42] some unique a unique set of problems where we lost some students um last fall um and that's brought our
[43:50] washout rate back up because they count as a washout um but what has been the the ad campaign to bring in
[43:57] excited young people to be controllers uh you know coupled with the time frame we've truncated the time
[44:04] frame that you can apply and until you get a seat in the academy it's 39 days it was pushing a year
[44:11] before and by the way that was not an easy uh problem to grapple with probably one of the
[44:16] most difficult problems to grapple with how do we truncate the time you know get the physicals get the
[44:20] testing you know and get a spot in the academy um so that is still a work in progress but it um it
[44:26] should be lower than 30 percent but we had some unique problems in the fall a couple of fall and i'm
[44:33] sure you're aware of this uh recently we had the faa director mr bedford out there which was i think the
[44:39] first time we've had a visit in seven or eight years really appreciated it appreciated the team
[44:46] uh very very impressive uh group that you've assembled there um could you talk a little bit
[44:52] about the importance when you're training of having literally direct trainers there with them not you
[44:59] know not trying to do all of this over the uh over the internet makes a big difference to have real
[45:05] instructors in a face-to-face relationship with students so just to be clear i did beat the
[45:11] administrator to the academy i've been there early in my tenure so um and it's a remarkable facility um
[45:17] and uh oklahoma city is the hub and they do an excellent job but you do want um hands-on skilled
[45:25] training this is not something that you do uh over the internet uh we get experienced controllers um
[45:32] experienced professors to come in and give great instruction to the young men and women at the
[45:36] academy um and if by the way if anyone hasn't been to the academy you should actually go and see the
[45:41] training facilities um in oklahoma city it's it's it's quite remarkable um and and one of the you know
[45:48] this one of the issues that we have is the throughput through the academy and uh it's it's you need to
[45:56] get the right the right professors in the right um former air traffic controllers in um so we can
[46:03] move students through the system we've also offered students because if you get if you fall behind
[46:09] you're just you're taken out and so we've offered uh tutoring services so if you fall a little bit
[46:14] behind and you're you're an energetic smart young adult we can keep you in the program you gotta still
[46:21] you gotta still meet the scores you still gotta meet the benchmarks but if you just need a little
[46:26] extra help we're offering that to the young people uh who are there to get them you know to get them
[46:32] through and that can be helpful on the washout rate just a little extra time that you can give to
[46:36] someone can make a big difference for a great air traffic controller appreciate that i'm running up
[46:40] in the end of my time uh but i would like to ask you to i know you know we've got the olympics coming in
[46:46] 28. unusually oklahoma city is one actually a minor part of the site we're not los angeles but we have
[46:53] softball and water sports and uh you've got a uh system of distributing the the monies we vote which
[47:00] seems to be working well but could you sort of tell us where you're at in that process yes so you
[47:06] you all sent uh a pot of money and i could i could uh walk through how that money is being spent but
[47:15] all of all of the locations for the olympics are going to um receive money obviously los angeles is
[47:23] going to get get a lot more uh this for transit specifically almost 90 million but if you want
[47:28] oklahoma city or oklahoma is going to be 2.5 million dollars um and again the the less you have going
[47:36] on with the olympics the less money you're going to get in transit most is going to be california and
[47:40] they're getting the biggest not a complaint just uh wanted to flag it for you california might object
[47:45] if we gave you as much as that thank you very much i yield back thank you mr laura thank you very much
[47:54] mr chairman mr secretary i want to talk a little bit about rail investments in rail including amtrak
[48:01] critical importance to the economy particularly to my constituents and those who live along the
[48:06] northeast corridor and rely on the service to connect them with their schools with their jobs including
[48:11] myself i take the uh i take amtrak twice a week um and love it so i know that the northeast corridor
[48:18] rail line is a service uh it's a lifeline six trillion dollars uh to the economic region which
[48:25] spans from 12 states from virginia to maine um the budget requests that we received from the departments
[48:31] through omb in addition to that we've historically received a grant request directly from amtrak this year
[48:37] the amtrak board of directors which you are a member has chosen not to submit its independent
[48:43] funding request to the congress um i appreciate receiving the department's request your views on
[48:48] this um having the separate request from amtrak in years past has been critical it helps the committee
[48:55] uh to fully understand stand how best to provide the resources to meet amtrak's needs
[49:00] and while uh uh the chair of the subcommittee and i may disagree on the overall t-hud bill that passed
[49:06] out of the subcommittee this morning i want to say a thank you to chairman womack for including language
[49:11] that will make it a requirement um for amtrak to submit a funding request in the future uh your budget
[49:18] request mr secretary 2.1 billion dollars for amtrak it's a cut of 327 million from last year's funding
[49:25] levels to what extent did the federal railroad administration consult amtrak when it developed
[49:31] the 2.1 billion estimate for fiscal year 2027 well uh congresswoman uh it's good to see you uh if you
[49:40] recall we started the ovarian uh cancer caucus together a warrior um on that issue and i think
[49:48] america and those women who have ovarian cancer need someone like you to fight for them so thank you
[49:53] uh for that and if it's if it's touched your life uh someone in your life you know how important it is
[49:58] and this body needs to pay attention to it um so thank you for that uh so we we submit as you know
[50:05] there's a back and forth that we have with the administration with omb um and there are submissions
[50:10] that that that we make and and we um work together and and come up with um a strategy and a set of numbers
[50:17] to submit to this body uh but i would join you i think that amtrak is important our ridership
[50:23] is up we're dynamically pricing which i as as a business model is great as a rider it's not
[50:28] great because my some of my prices go go up when i'm traveling um so with amtrak so in terms of the
[50:36] 2.1 billion for fiscal 2020 amtrak amtrak weighs in on you know their viewpoint um and again we work
[50:44] with there's a you know there's a lot of different components that go into putting this product
[50:49] together to submit to you it's my understanding though and i just wanted to get um uh your request
[50:56] is 327 below 2026 but the capital plan that amtrak has laid out calls for 2.4 billion in federal
[51:04] appropriations which is what they say is necessary uh to continue passenger operator capital state of
[51:12] good repair activities for 2027. um so i i've got some of uh a state of good repair work may go
[51:21] unaddressed at at the lower level what are the implications if any if amtrak is funded at the
[51:27] lower level well i think which is which is which is helpful northeast corridor people are people are
[51:37] riding right that's great and by the way in connecticut we've made as i think you're aware a lot of uh
[51:42] investments on rail um for for rail we've made a lot of investments there um but i think with the
[51:51] ridership and the extra resources that are coming in i think that's how we see the bridge being met
[51:56] um as we you know look at what what does the congress need to provide to amtrak and what can amtrak
[52:02] do on their own because of the great success of amtrak in this environment and the ridership and
[52:07] and the dynamic pricing well i i would just say look i i i'm going to look forward to hearing from an
[52:15] independent amtrak as well in the future i appreciate that and and to working with the
[52:20] chairman to fully understand what amtrak needs to support its rise i applaud you know the uh uh
[52:27] you know the increased ridership etc uh because it is such a a vital and valuable economic engine
[52:34] so uh and that you know we i'm i'm for uh continuing to invest in rail and building the progress that we
[52:41] have could i ask could i mention one other thing on amtrak we've worked with the unions and we've
[52:46] worked with uh other stakeholders we're and i'll i'd love to work with you as well when we get to that
[52:51] point but maybe you've heard of this we're trying to look i don't look to europe all the time as a
[52:56] model of how i want to do things but they do rail way better than we do their rail is exquisite and so
[53:03] we want to take some lessons on how they've structured their rail and apply them here we're the only ones
[53:10] that do rail this way and i think if we rethink the model how it's structured not privatized
[53:16] i don't i will not know but i think we do a different structure it's going to be better for
[53:20] states and i think we're going to get better purview into how the money is being spent and so i would
[53:25] as we work through that um i would welcome your input and insight into what we're thinking about but
[53:31] i think we i think we can do even better look forward to that thank you mr secretary thank you chairman
[53:37] rogers thank you mr chairman mr secretary welcome home it's good to be home you had a great career
[53:48] here and thank you mr chairman house and you're doing great work where you are you mentioned in your
[53:53] opening remarks about uh that your job is to work the family work for the family well you're an expert in
[54:05] in that field too those uh nine kids you and the missus i want to talk to you about two things that
[54:14] matter enormously in my district the first is the appalachian development highway system program has
[54:24] been a bipartisan commitment for over 50 years and remains unfinished the corridors that still
[54:32] need to be built through some of the most economically isolated communities in america and completing
[54:42] that system would be genuinely transformative as we've seen in parts of the area so far tell me where
[54:50] adhs stands in the budget and whether the administration is seeing it through uh i should also
[55:00] say i i i think i said former chairman it's like probably saying former marine mr chairman um i'll
[55:08] let me take a look i uh i want to see where that's at um on where that is and i would just note that in
[55:16] in your state you're right i know in south carolina there's a lot of projects big projects and the
[55:22] population has changed throughout the country and how do we how do we look to those changes that can
[55:26] accommodate the american people and make the investments in the right places so i'll follow up with you on that
[55:30] project good thank you yes the second issue is emergency relief funds um eastern kentucky has been hit
[55:41] terribly time and again with hundreds of roads and bridges destroyed we also know the relief program
[55:52] has carried a significant national backlog at one point exceeding eight billion dollars which compounds as
[56:02] more disasters take place my communities can't wait years for the federal process to catch up to the
[56:12] damage on the ground that's there what is the department doing to expedite emergency relief
[56:24] to states with outstanding disaster related projects well it the resources that you all give me i don't have a
[56:34] lot of dollars there um on the emergency front i usually look to fema to be somewhat helpful they
[56:40] have a way bigger pot of money for us but it is looking to um those areas that have been hit hard by
[56:47] disaster and looking how we can apply grant money to those to those hard-hit areas again american citizens
[56:55] that need the help of their government and their federal dot um to make the critical investment so
[57:01] um if you want to talk further about what the needs are uh in eastern kentucky uh i'm i'm happy to do
[57:09] that and i'm not sure if there's if where the application process is um with from the state and
[57:14] the state dot um but i'll i'll get briefed up and i can give you a call good thank you good luck thank you
[57:27] miss Watson Coleman thank you very much thank you mr secretary for your kind words about my retirement
[57:35] um and thank you for being here um earlier this week you were asked by senator gillibrand about the
[57:43] gateway tunnel project um and so this time you're going to hear from the other side of the hudson
[57:50] about it uh your department notified the development the gateway development corporation commission i'm
[57:57] sorry that it was reviewing the tunnel projects for civil rights violations and on february the 9th the
[58:03] southern district of new york put an injunction so that the federal funds would continue to flow
[58:09] could you first of all do you appreciate how important this gateway project is do you support it
[58:18] so first i will say congratulations uh not just service in the house but a long uh line of decades
[58:25] of government service so thank you and i as i mentioned you're going to in an odd way you're going
[58:30] to miss it um you're going to miss all the fights and the bickering and you're not going to take all my
[58:34] time i'm not saying nice things to me but i will tell you well you deserve nice things to be said
[58:42] yeah this is as i mentioned to the senator this is the largest project in the western hemisphere it's so
[58:48] vitally important yeah yeah you have you have no argument for me what what we we we have to also follow
[58:53] the law and the and um that's what the push was on the project and yeah i want to ask about that
[59:00] specifically what is the status of the civil rights uh review what were the reasons that it was even an
[59:10] issue well it was there there was three projects and there was a lot of press and commentary about how
[59:19] they were going through race-based contracting and dbe is is important and you know disadvantaged
[59:25] businesses and and looking at that but the supreme court said you this one factor can be sex but that
[59:34] can't be the only factor and that's what we found was though they said they'll change the way they
[59:40] contract and so that's it's still it's money's flowing to the project right now but um and they've
[59:46] agreed like no we can't do it that way and we won't do it that way what what is the status of the review
[59:51] right now uh well we so so there there's still pending litigation right now and it's based on that
[1:00:00] review and there's a couple factors checked so i spent a good part part of my career in civil rights
[1:00:10] enforcement yes the whole development of um recognizing remediating the impact of prior
[1:00:20] discrimination which is a legitimate responsibility of government when putting out taxpayers
[1:00:26] money can you tell me when you think that this review will be done and any barriers that exist or any
[1:00:35] concerns that raise can be um addressed so i would i'll tell you that this is more of a a litigation
[1:00:43] issue than now you know probably where we're at with the in the process of the review the the the
[1:00:48] properative at this point and we're working through the finer details so can i thank you but not long
[1:00:57] as the uh secretary then could i ask you for a commitment through this because someone gets
[1:01:07] someone high up gets mad because things aren't moving in the direction that they'd like them to
[1:01:12] move or what or whatnot that we recognize we got to get this done this is historic it's a it's a very
[1:01:18] big project so um versus something on foreseeable of course i'm going to move forward with the project
[1:01:25] so um the ranking member of our committee basically took my thunder was because i obviously if i'm
[1:01:34] going to talk about the gateway time i'm going to talk about amtrak that goes through it all the time
[1:01:39] because i do have some information i mean there over 200 million passengers travel each year by
[1:01:45] approximately 2100 a day and this includes an average of 122 000 riders each and every day sorry my
[1:01:55] question is when we are when we are reducing the funding towards uh amtrak that obviously has a
[1:02:05] lot of outstanding needs with so many people in it running you know need to have of this um trains in
[1:02:17] good repair and systems in good repair so if we're taking this money away from them are you anticipating
[1:02:25] replacing that loss to amtrak from another account and if so what might that be so i'm committed to
[1:02:34] making sure amtrak functions and functions well and serves people and if i could just underscore this
[1:02:40] point yesterday we announced we are going to rebuild penn station now if if gateway doesn't happen
[1:02:48] does it make sense to do penn station probably not and a lot of good work to be done but it's trains
[1:02:57] and we are fully engaged going through that process and the announcement you know came out yesterday so
[1:03:02] i do care about uh uh the service that's provided and i'm making investments to make sure that um along
[1:03:10] the people who um who ride i appreciate that um i have two really quick questions number one is you have
[1:03:20] any idea why amtrak refused or did did not put in a request i do i could double check that i'm not sure
[1:03:30] i could my my last little tiny question has to do with the safety issues that um the secretary
[1:03:37] he's so generous only because only because you're retiring and and you don't have to deal with me
[1:03:42] anymore and all those great things that were said about you this morning in our markup yeah are you a
[1:03:50] member of the board and i have a i have a i have a designate on the board yes but i don't i don't know why
[1:03:56] they didn't well i have my my uh uh uh i mean i'm curious as to s2 sits on the board and who by the
[1:04:03] way uh is one who actually loves amtrak a lot and cares about it and listen you're not good we're
[1:04:09] going to be in a good place okay um i'm going to i'm going to ask my colleague to ask that other
[1:04:15] question that little tiny question i had you're you're the safety for licenses licensing of commercial
[1:04:24] trucks you refer to it as a problem that we're having and you kept saying that you kept implying
[1:04:30] that it were that it was non-american folks that were responsible for this they're the only ones and
[1:04:40] what percentage of it are immigrants that are very quickly very quickly we got to move on i'll provide
[1:04:48] data but as a percentage um i think we're seeing a lot of these crashes but i'll i'll look at the data
[1:04:53] and send it over to you thank you ms watching coleman sheriff it was two minutes over chairman
[1:05:03] secretary delphi it's great to see you again in uh high school students to attend our military academies
[1:05:13] and um you meet some of the best and brightest uh of our children and um we you know particularly as a
[1:05:24] coastal community representative uh not only is annapolis very in process but also i push very
[1:05:33] heavily on the uh uh the uh u.s merchant marine academy which i was really glad to hear you bring
[1:05:41] that up because i want to focus uh my questioning around our maritime industry and the needs there
[1:05:49] um and and having seen your frequent visits to the merchant marine academy campus
[1:05:55] it's clear to me that you an academy uh but you mentioned even in your opening remarks and i was
[1:06:05] glad to hear that because i know what a focus you're putting on that and you know that uh that
[1:06:15] challenge to look at uh the merchant marine academy in the in the really desperate needs there
[1:06:24] from a facility standpoint modernization and i know there's an academy modernization
[1:06:35] plan and uh if if you could talk just a little bit about that and how you think this committee
[1:06:44] i i want this subcommittee to hear as it exists now and where you think it should be going
[1:06:53] congressman i appreciate the question um i again i don't mean to keep calling on mr clavern but he
[1:06:59] mentioned that the the rating on our roads is a c into the merchant marine academy are an f
[1:07:06] it is it's deplorable the way these kids are are are living they didn't have works they're reading off
[1:07:14] paper plates and plastic forks and so one of the problems that the committee had and i think this is
[1:07:21] fair is invested and spent and the point you made to me was hey why are we going to give you more money
[1:07:30] if you can't spend the money they've already given you and i think that's a fair point from this body
[1:07:35] we have hired the um the army corps plan um but one of the issues is that um there's so much there's so
[1:07:48] much work just to keep it operational and i mean keeping buildings from to that um so i would say to
[1:07:58] the tune of i mean if if this is the proposal and it's going to come in at you know uh for capital
[1:08:04] improvement 70 million uh shut it down send the kids home and i don't want you to do that i i'm i
[1:08:12] don't want sometimes we can forget about shipping well today we're not we see how important shipping
[1:08:20] is it is i mean almost all our products move on ships and do we want to have american sailors sail
[1:08:26] those ships if we come into times of conflict these are the these are the men and women who sail
[1:08:31] those ships to to back up our military there are critical are you know but we can't win this i i if we did
[1:08:41] it really billion dollars um it's if we take a long time it's gonna be three billion dollars but
[1:08:49] every academy is is getting you know 600 million for this some are getting brand new stadiums and
[1:08:54] these kids don't have hot water the young men and women come they're going to graduate on the on the
[1:09:03] 20th or 22nd of june come and see them and you'll say that we shouldn't we should not see the maritime
[1:09:13] industry to some foreign country it should be ours we were the best and we should be the best in the
[1:09:18] future amen thank you and and another issue here and that is our u.s maritime line uh when i look at
[1:09:37] the two recent uh jones act waivers these days that our uh u.s flag vessels are not being utilized when
[1:09:51] they're available they're asked for by the secretary of defense that precludes uh uh any even look for
[1:10:04] jones if the waiver is under the 501b that's done by the department of homeland security and then there's
[1:10:17] a look mark the jones act vessel available they get that call as opposed to a foreign uh flag vessel can can
[1:10:29] can you talk about the importance of supporting our our our supply chain integrity and resiliency
[1:10:39] and the impact that these waivers are having on that in a homeland together we were advised at the
[1:10:48] at the end that this was going to happen but we were not consulted um but if if we can figure out
[1:10:54] how we get cargo on ships that's a some work we can all do together because i think we want to build
[1:11:03] ships in america but if you think this is like cabotage so we don't let a foreign carrier fly into the
[1:11:10] u.s pick up passengers in new york and then fly to california we prohibit that you can't do it and
[1:11:16] it's the same philosophy in maritime right we you can come in but you can't sail around our ports and i
[1:11:23] think uh if we didn't have um and so uh this is a unique time and um we'll get through this time and i don't
[1:11:33] see long-term waivers but in this moment um i thought again war has different and probably better
[1:11:41] information on what i'm not going to comment on on the decision they had to make but thank you for
[1:11:48] bringing that up sorry mr chairman i yield back thank you and for the record both sides are now even
[1:11:53] on time on time miss torres maybe not for long uh secretary duffy thank you so much for being here
[1:12:03] um today i i do appreciate you being here uh the city of uh claremont um they the city of claremont was
[1:12:13] deemed uh ineligible for a fiscal year 2025 safe streets for all grant uh because missed an email um
[1:12:27] missy missed an email missed an email but um secretary mistakes happen i rise for an in-house error
[1:12:38] or be forced to pay thousands more in filing for a new application my with the city of claremont they
[1:12:51] are asking for their fiscal year 25 application to be considered in fiscal year 26 without having to
[1:12:59] reapply if they have to reapply then they are going to have to cover the that they spent in the original
[1:13:07] application i have an email here i don't want to put it to the record i'm happy to give it was missed
[1:13:15] um by one of the staff i i would i would welcome that and if if that ever happens in the future and
[1:13:20] you want to text me to i and so i can work on remedying that okay more quickly i would welcome a text
[1:13:26] from you to say let's make this right right now not i i really appreciate that in your openness to
[1:13:35] discuss all of these different issues offline uh with us i will have i represent a freight corridor
[1:13:44] um the la including priorities for the la 28 games uh one of those is going to take place literally
[1:13:52] like 20 seconds from my front door so i invite you to come and spend some time in in my district
[1:13:58] during that time and bring that your house maybe or much has been said already in other committees
[1:14:07] that i i don't want to talk about in that way about the road trip um i want to do i do want to say
[1:14:15] personally that it it it warmed my heart um it brought to me a lot of memories of my chat
[1:14:23] uaw household and being able to afford to take camping trips in the summer in the winter a road
[1:14:35] trip is a great way to show off our beautiful national parks as we especially as we celebrate
[1:14:44] it's unfortunate that president trump is making road trips unaffordable because of his illegal war in iran
[1:14:51] the tariffs and a complete disregard for the closest my the families that i represent will get to seeing
[1:15:02] the beautiful sites is hopefully they'll watch on youtube because i think it was beautiful um your
[1:15:13] trip was filmed over the course of seven months 24 days between september 2025 and may 2026. um i want
[1:15:22] to submit chairman uh for the record this article which states that during the 43-day republican
[1:15:27] government shutdown um we had air traffic controller high absences um three of those uh days of that
[1:15:39] trip um you know secretary was on that trip um between can i put this to the record without objection
[1:15:48] thank you um secretary duffy between 20 september 2025 and may 2020 aviation accident database
[1:15:59] uh states that there were over 900 aviation accidents 167 of them fatal we have major dlt issues that
[1:16:10] you've outlined in your opening statement and while i also want to celebrate the 250th birthday we have a
[1:16:17] lot of urgent needs um you have a lot on your plate i don't envy the work that you have on your plate
[1:16:27] uh didn't affect your job performance uh being the secretary of transportation
[1:16:31] um my colleagues on the other side of the aisle um were convulsing when the former secretary of
[1:16:40] transportation to um parental leave when his twins um were unfortunately ill and hospitalized so
[1:16:50] i i i want you to explain how did you manage um that remote work um is there anything that you can
[1:17:03] have been suggesting to be allowed to do some of that work i'm gonna i'm gonna allow him to answer the
[1:17:10] question i just want to remind the subcommittee here that we have a five minute rule for a reason
[1:17:15] and if you're going to spend most of your time editorializing that's your call but uh to be
[1:17:23] respectful of everybody else's time listen i appreciate the kind question i don't want this to be a
[1:17:31] negative thing i want you to talk about let him answer working let him answer i don't take it i
[1:17:38] appreciate the question actually was done to celebrate as you mentioned america too fast away
[1:17:48] a couple years ago um my dad wouldn't come with us but my mom would drive us from wisconsin to arizona
[1:17:54] or wisconsin to california wisconsin to florida some of the finest memories i had with her and as she
[1:18:00] talked to her about the road trips i've done those with my own kids and i think it's a great way
[1:18:07] on people to come to california as well so to incentivize people to see their country
[1:18:14] i think is a beautiful thing and i'm not yeah i know you're not saying they shouldn't but um
[1:18:19] and it's one thing that 50th birthday but also the beauty of our country that brings us together
[1:18:27] and so this was run through the career ethics that worked for me in the last minute uh this makes
[1:18:35] sense it was in partnership um with a uh with a non-profit um it's uh 250 um and this body has told me
[1:18:48] that uh one of my jobs is to promote travel and tourism i didn't make any money i didn't get i
[1:18:56] don't get anything i did it with my my children but how did you manage that to film it and so to
[1:19:01] that the shutdown i think between everybody here um i was sick of seeing myself at airports all over
[1:19:12] this country i was everywhere um thank you thank you mr secretary i did we appreciate we appreciate
[1:19:17] that i did it in a way we appreciate that i'm going to reclaim the time here okay just getting
[1:19:22] going mr chairman thank you chairman i want our members heed the gavel heed the gavel mr zinke well
[1:19:29] thank you mr chairman miss i wish you would have went to montana during your trip i'm i'm glad actually
[1:19:37] you were on the front line looking at the roads maybe i did go to montana just got to tune in let's
[1:19:45] talk about montana really really really quick uh you're you're from wisconsin from montana you know
[1:19:50] it's rural out there and a lot of it is our essential air service i i see in the budget on page 23
[1:19:58] your recommendation is identify a cut of three um you know montana way out there
[1:20:09] some of us regulatory uh some of these security systems are adding a lot of cost
[1:20:13] uh and we're not chicago uh we're calispell or we're butte montana and somebody but they don't
[1:20:23] make a lot of sense out there and on the cut we would just want to make sure and have your commitment
[1:20:28] that you'll you'll look at those and make sure we don't cut services but cut this money was spent
[1:20:37] but the the services i think are essential so if i could have your commitment you'll take a look at that
[1:20:42] with us and make sure we don't cut the services uh behind the eas program don't want to cut services
[1:20:48] i had es eas uh airports in my district and i would just you as as we didn't have funding
[1:20:55] for eas during the shutdown the the president was i was in constant contact with him we found resources
[1:21:02] to keep eas uh operational so we didn't lose service to the rural parts of america during that
[1:21:08] shutdown the 43 days so that i think that underscores the commitment that i have with
[1:21:13] the president to provide for the rural parts of the country as american interest or american indians
[1:21:23] and tribal centric but those those smaller communities you know serve our our reservations
[1:21:28] and our indian nations as well let's turn really quick to drones love uh are we are we going to give
[1:21:34] the drones 500 feet below are we still going to require them to have pilot's license or are we going to
[1:21:40] have europe run roughshod over us on their ability to fly drones and technology where is the drone
[1:21:47] program in your assessment and and and how can we move forward safely that's that's a fantastic
[1:21:53] question and just to take one of your points of course i said it i don't want i don't i don't want
[1:21:58] somewhere else uh to um dominate the drone industry um a lot of a lot of information can come off
[1:22:07] of a drone uh for those who may not like us so much we want uh american drone dominance and so we have
[1:22:13] put out rules that allow it easier for um a lot of these manufacturers and service providers um to
[1:22:21] navigate in the nas um and it's it's it but it does go to the point that we are going to have a more
[1:22:27] complicated airspace with its with drones and with evitals um and how we manage that becomes critical
[1:22:34] and and what kind of a beacon or squawk does each of these have um is is critical to to safety but
[1:22:41] also making sure that we can continue to innovate in the country i think we're going to all see
[1:22:45] not in new york not in dc but we're going to see uh drone deliveries um of far more frequently it's
[1:22:52] happening in a lot of cities um but um i think it's going to happen uh more frequently around the country
[1:22:58] and and does the department have an articulated plan on milestones and timelines for integration
[1:23:04] into the nas we did we put we put out um a proposal and i can send that over to you as well and by the
[1:23:10] way you know we manage we're trying to manage there's the commercial side of it there's also as
[1:23:15] you know this all too well there's a military side of drones as well and trying to marry those two
[1:23:19] things together on the national security front but also allowing the commercial side of the innovation
[1:23:24] to happen um is what we're working with war on right now to make sure we can do both i think
[1:23:29] we're both hogging the same sheet we want to make sure we dominate drones with some of it is precision
[1:23:33] farming wildlife management all those things pipeline done more efficiently and i appreciate your work
[1:23:39] on it and with that uh the time i yield back thank you mr espiont thank you mr chairman secretary
[1:23:48] it's been about a year since you were last year we were talking about air traffic controllers back then
[1:23:54] um i speak to the controllers often and they're really unsung heroes and deserve our full support
[1:24:03] uh i wanted to ask you uh that the house t hud bill provides resources that should lead to
[1:24:10] the hiring of an additional 2300 controllers that target number is not necessarily easy to obtain
[1:24:18] i know that we are investing in in the academy but every candidate cannot go up and down to
[1:24:24] oklahoma anybody from oklahoma here but i'm proud of my work uh to design and establish the charles b
[1:24:33] wrangle infrastructure workforce initiative a city college in new york which brings young talent from
[1:24:40] harlem the bronx and the heights into the trays and onto jobs like gateway second avenue and subways
[1:24:47] it had more than a thousand enrollees last year um i want to know if if there's room for this type of
[1:24:53] initiatives to uh also build the capacity for atc candidates and are you willing to work with us
[1:25:00] we do have schools that we have a program where they can be trained in and if you have a a college
[1:25:06] or a school that would like to um talk to us about how they could apply and make that happen i would be
[1:25:12] uh be happy to do that can i just make one other point on the controllers we it one part is getting the
[1:25:16] controllers into the academy and that's important getting the right students into the academy we're we
[1:25:22] we didn't think i've told you this but we are we are paying uh controllers who are of the age where
[1:25:27] they can retire they're the most experienced controllers that we have and and i want them to
[1:25:32] stay so i we've offered them a 20 up front cash bonus for every year they'll stay i mean again new
[1:25:39] controllers are great but they got to get trained up if you have a controller that you already have the
[1:25:43] expertise we don't want to lose them and i've had i think at least 600 controllers have taken us up on
[1:25:48] that and so we're trying to think of it through through every different lens of keeping more in
[1:25:54] and happy to work with you on on the school that could bring more kids from harlem into air traffic
[1:25:58] control thank you thank you so much now local hiring our aspirations as members of congress and
[1:26:05] representing our districts is that some of these projects like gateway second avenue subway my district
[1:26:11] and of course uh penn station which was announced uh this week uh that we have local hiring that
[1:26:18] people from our communities our constituencies get those opportunities are you guys how are you guys
[1:26:25] committed to local hiring um i gotta look at the the policies the nofos and the proposals um i think
[1:26:33] it's hard for a community when uh to your point you bring in an outside workforce some from some far
[1:26:39] out place instead of not just giving jobs but giving training to people in your community where the
[1:26:44] projects happen i think that's always best um but the requirement on local hiring i'm not
[1:26:49] sure that i have that um but i would be happy to talk to you about it and maybe we can modify how
[1:26:54] we do the nofos because i think many of this project in my case second avenue subway we don't
[1:26:58] want it just to be three subway stops we want it to be an economic engine for the community move
[1:27:04] forward together with with that initiative 100 and i look forward to working with you finally uh
[1:27:09] mr secretary uh secret dhs secretary mark ray mullen just told uh travel executives that he's serious about
[1:27:17] curving international flights to u.s airports in cities with sanctuary policies which obviously
[1:27:26] could force airlines to reroute and inflict economic pain on travelers what's your position on that well
[1:27:33] i'm not familiar with the statement from um from the secretary uh listen i i view i view what i do
[1:27:41] through the lens of america and i think all of you could attest that that's the way i have i've run this
[1:27:47] department because again you can't say i can't separate your district from my hometown because we
[1:27:52] all travel through each other's districts so um i'd like to take a look at his his comments and get the
[1:27:59] context and not even ask him a question of what he meant by that but we want we have people from around
[1:28:03] the world and around the country that need to be able to fly into all different kinds of places we
[1:28:07] shouldn't down we shouldn't shut down air travel in a in a state that doesn't agree with our politics
[1:28:11] it's again because by the way that role will be reversed right we're going to switch well we all
[1:28:16] switch you all switch spots at one point hopefully not too soon mr chairman well i'll take that as an
[1:28:23] answer and i'll yield back thank you thank you mr secretary thank you mr joyce thank you mr chairman um it's always a
[1:28:35] pleasure to see you secretary good to see you uh first question i think i asked you last time you're
[1:28:41] going to look into it i'm going to bring it up again just to refresh your recollection but it involves
[1:28:46] the port infrastructure development program and they have substantial investments in your ports
[1:28:53] nationwide uh but since fiscal year 2019 the funding of the great lakes despite playing a critical role
[1:29:00] obviously in domestic manufacturing energy transportation strategic material movement
[1:29:05] and supply chain resilience these ports are essential economic and national security assets
[1:29:10] and the continued investment and you know will help us for our long-term competitiveness and the
[1:29:15] livelihood of the region as the department looks ahead to future pitip i shortened that pitip
[1:29:21] awards and broader infrastructure investments how can dot better position great lake ports to compete for
[1:29:27] federal funding opportunities and additionally what opportunities do you see in which we could
[1:29:32] expand federal investment in the great lakes and inland systems to strengthen domestic supply change
[1:29:37] economic resilience and long-term regional competitiveness it'd be helpful to have a secretary who
[1:29:41] actually understood the great lakes maybe lived on the great lakes um was near the great lakes um that's why
[1:29:48] you got that one i'm from wisconsin and i i i lived actually in uh ashland wisconsin rose the prosecutor
[1:29:55] there it's by the way it's beautiful um but i i i think um there's a lot there's so many needs
[1:30:02] and i think it's it's a competition between where are the biggest needs where's the biggest bang for the buck
[1:30:08] um but i will put some attention on to the great lakes uh more so uh than i've been able to at this point
[1:30:14] because we're trying to get some of these um other projects out but i will maybe we can work together
[1:30:20] on kind of where is it where is where where do we get the the biggest um bang for the dollars we put
[1:30:25] in but we can't forget the great lakes it's a it's a it's a it's a incredibly important artery
[1:30:30] um that um is is beautiful and important um for this country thank you we just want to be competitive
[1:30:36] in the grant aware uh announcements and if you you know you can't get to it i'm going to sick marcy
[1:30:42] captor on you and marcy is a a storm when it comes to these things it's great another question i have
[1:30:48] for you is in the wake of the east palestine derailment real safety and system uh resilience
[1:30:53] remain a major focus for communities surrounding my my district and for congress as a whole one area
[1:31:00] has received less attention in this conversation is the software systems railroads use to dispatch
[1:31:04] and route trains through there in 2024 the fra stated there are currently no regulations supporting
[1:31:11] the oversight of train dispatching software these computer-aided these dispatch systems provide
[1:31:16] rail operators with real-time information on the trail on train locations track occupancy and such
[1:31:22] given the rail industry's growing reliance on these technologies how is the department and the
[1:31:26] fra evaluating safety and resiliency of train dispatching software today in the software um i don't
[1:31:33] have an answer for you right now but i will take a look at that and i could uh circle back you
[1:31:38] back to you with uh with fra but you know rail safety and we saw with east palestine how how tragic
[1:31:44] that was in the long-term implications and one of the things i think that we do actually very well
[1:31:49] whether it's in you know whatever our mode of transportation we're talking about when when bad
[1:31:53] things happen and we we don't want that because we're safety driven but we actually learn from
[1:31:59] what's happened and try to uh improve our systems um so we don't make the same mistakes over and over
[1:32:05] again we continue to get safer with better policy and better equipment well you know this is one of the
[1:32:10] things that's being bent heard about now and downstairs in the t and i hearing but should
[1:32:14] additional federal standards oversight reporting mechanisms be considered by the department or
[1:32:19] congress to help prevent widespread operational disruptions and strengthen rail safety oh listen
[1:32:24] i think there's a lot that can be done in this body uh when you look at rail safety um and there's
[1:32:29] the rail safety act i know which is being considered uh right now is it downstairs is this where this is
[1:32:34] happening i i know the financial services uh uh uh room is but yeah i know that's being uh that's
[1:32:40] being considered right now but there's a lot we can do to continue to drive safety and uh it's it's one
[1:32:45] of the rail is one of these things that you can forget about if you if you um if you don't uh work in
[1:32:52] it or you don't have rail close to you but it's a it's critical whether it's shipping or rail the country
[1:32:58] doesn't work um uh without these uh important modes of transportation so um i'm interested to see what
[1:33:05] the the committee does and um how they consider the rail safety act but a lot of good things in
[1:33:10] there certainly appreciate it thank you keep up the great work i yield back thank you mr quigley
[1:33:14] thank you chairman mr secretary let's have a deal lightning round three quick questions three quick
[1:33:19] answers then we're done all big yeah i'll write you a note okay but you talk about big bang for your buck
[1:33:26] o'hare busiest airport yep um most flights transfer through there you mentioned the tower there yep
[1:33:34] because that one tower is so understaffed we got a runway that's barely used and it's brand new how
[1:33:40] close are we to addressing that so first i i can be kind of quick and not really quick because
[1:33:47] you're right it's if you've been up in the tower i mean the airport is massive and how that airport
[1:33:51] functions is a testament to the great controllers that we have um but i do in the request that i'm
[1:33:57] going to make i can you have three towers um i do think that if we get a new tower um and we get better
[1:34:04] visibility i think you're going to get better performance out of out of the airport and again
[1:34:08] as a wisconsin guy from real wisconsin it's one of the main arteries that we travel through if you want
[1:34:12] to go see a packer game you've got to go through o'hare so that's fine but you we respect this so we can
[1:34:18] finish we didn't get to the bears this last year which was challenging for us it's been a long time
[1:34:23] you i'm with you but we just got to get staff uh the red line yes extension and it's hard for
[1:34:32] chicagoans not to see that as some degree of vindictiveness of holding it back and it drives up
[1:34:37] costs and it puts risk but just put this in perspective big bang for your buck amtrak 34 million
[1:34:43] rides riders a year chicago transit authority 338 million it means the world to
[1:34:52] the southland extend that and these delays make it more and more expensive can we get through this
[1:34:58] and not have to have a court order to get the money continually going through there to extend
[1:35:03] and vindictive not i'm i've without even you asking me i will tell everyone you did ask me
[1:35:09] but listen i'm looking at o'hare i i haven't had any issue with chicago but it was it's not how they
[1:35:16] were how they were contracting and we're in a good place now money's going um flowing to the project
[1:35:21] what i would ask you i think we do all have to work together we do have to drive better safety
[1:35:25] we do need better policies in place so riders are are safe and i think that's just good government
[1:35:30] you'll get even more riders on your system let me just stop you for a second yeah this week i met
[1:35:34] with three bus driver three bus drivers who had been involved in crime scenes and they were victims of
[1:35:41] this and we talked about what cta can do better so i acknowledge that but you don't help when you cut
[1:35:49] money instead let's talk about changes in policies but can you help us get more security you know it's
[1:35:56] a lot easier to meet in the middle where we don't all yell at each other 100 like 100 so let's let's
[1:36:01] keep talking on just on that one if i could just quickly i i don't want to be the one that cares the
[1:36:06] most about i think you know locally if there's a lot of care if you if you if we can talk on a plan
[1:36:11] on what you'll do on safety and then what you're going to need me to come on the back end and help you
[1:36:15] with i'm i'm all in i don't i don't want to fight on anything below we're actually merging metro pace
[1:36:21] cta functions and you know we'll get there and they're going to have a security force so that's
[1:36:26] part of me in the middle to keep us on track the interchange everything being biggest and best best
[1:36:31] there interstate 294 and interstates 290 88 this matters to the whole country because all the freight
[1:36:38] runs through this uh largest freight corridor in the united states uh and obviously the improvements
[1:36:46] that are necessary there uh this funding has not been obligated yet and the delays are impacting idot's
[1:36:54] ability to move forward with phase two of the project so uh for my friends in indiana and ohio
[1:37:01] and iowa and wisconsin this is where this is where everybody goes through so if you don't have it now if
[1:37:08] you could get back to us what what was what was that again what's the problem what is the interchange
[1:37:13] of interstate 294 and interstates 290 88 in the chicago region the most congested freight interchange
[1:37:20] in the united states according to the american transport research institute idot was awarded 95.6
[1:37:27] federal mega contract in 2024 for the uh interchange project okay i have a list of all the look into that
[1:37:35] i will because i have all the list of of of grants that um have not gone yet okay and i don't have
[1:37:40] that one on so i'd i'd welcome very good that follow-up let us know and we return the time we'll
[1:37:45] work through team that was rapid fire thank you mr strong thank you chairman womack uh ranking member
[1:37:52] cliburn uh mr secretary i congratulate you uh i noticed we had chairman uh cole here chairman rogers
[1:38:00] ranking member delora i mean you bring all the heavyweights in here everybody likes to see the secretary of
[1:38:05] transportation and i think everybody's been uh very good on this dice i think we ought to all get extra
[1:38:11] uh project for each one of us but uh that's just my opinion secretary duffy uh thank you for being here
[1:38:16] today it's uh good to see you again also glad to see uh members of your staff that have joined us
[1:38:22] today i know it's a hard job what they do i appreciate your commitment to the american people in
[1:38:26] making the effort to see america's transportation industry firsthand meeting with civil servants and
[1:38:32] specialists to keep this country running i want to um i would be proud to host you in rocket city usa
[1:38:40] alabama's fifth congressional district feel free to bring the wife and kids we'll take you to space
[1:38:45] camp and the u.s space and rocket center and i know you'll have a great time there you start looking
[1:38:50] at the district uh the work building up to our nation's infrastructure modernization and aviation
[1:38:55] systems and ensuring federal dollars uh deliver real results for taxpayers my district in north
[1:39:01] alabama is home to redstone arsenal where more than 45 000 people commute through the the gates
[1:39:07] every day making it the single largest employment site in the state of alabama secretary duffy before
[1:39:14] thousands of redstone civil servants contractors and service members can get on this base to carry out
[1:39:20] those critical missions many face severe traffic congestion and infrastructure constraints
[1:39:26] surrounding the installation these transportation bottlenecks
[1:39:29] do more than create computer frustration they affect operational efficiency and create vulnerability
[1:39:35] around facilities essential to our national security my district has seen firsthand how
[1:39:41] transportation investments directly affect economic growth innovation and national security i'd like
[1:39:47] to thank chairman womack for including 350 million in the build grant funding for direct investment
[1:39:53] in high growth areas including the huntsville metropolitan area i served 26 years in local government uh and i'm just
[1:40:02] telling you i saw firsthand what these grants can do in local government uh serving as the chairman of the
[1:40:07] madison county commission at that time the third largest county in the state of alabama and now the second
[1:40:12] largest county as the department evaluates build discretionary grant applications for project
[1:40:18] projects like road widening congestion relief and capacity improvements how will you implement target
[1:40:24] investments in high growth areas like huntsville and are you taking into account factors such as
[1:40:30] proximity to key national security assets and high growth areas so first off i had i had nasa for a great
[1:40:37] four months and i was going to go to take my kids to space camp and i never did probably one of my regrets and i could
[1:40:42] have come down and seen um your your district i think um i mentioned this before but the the country's
[1:40:48] changing and we have to try to meet the needs of the the growth areas and um and i'd like to come down
[1:40:55] because nothing um you don't get the same perspective when you talk about it versus when you actually come
[1:41:00] and see it but i have heard the stories about the congestion um that you have in your district um and how
[1:41:06] challenging it is and uh men and women are who are providing great service to our country are having
[1:41:11] challenges uh getting to and from work um and but that's that's we don't have and then you don't
[1:41:17] give me an endless amount of money and so uh uh figuring out what the right priorities are and what those
[1:41:24] bottlenecks are is what we work through um and um we're trying to use public private partnerships for
[1:41:31] some of them where it can work to to maximize our dollars or our loan capacity uh to to build more
[1:41:37] can i make can i make one pitch with i know you have a minute left but we if there's a way that
[1:41:42] we can all work together to everyone has projects that they want done if we could permit them faster
[1:41:48] we're going to spend less money and that doesn't mean permit just say yes there might be a there might
[1:41:53] be issues in with an environmental review that we just don't do a project but they can't take four or
[1:41:58] five and if we can do that better we can build so much more when 40 of a project can go to the permitting
[1:42:05] process versus turning dirt i can get so much more done um and that's a bipartisan thing we have to
[1:42:11] do together and i hope we we would and still be responsive to the environment but also have the
[1:42:16] money to build in all these places which i think is important i totally agree and another thing that i
[1:42:21] think that uh should be taken into account the states and local government need to get skin in the
[1:42:26] ball game if it's a number one priority in their area they've got to find a way to bring dollars to
[1:42:31] the table and i think that ought to be given uh consideration when you do it uh mr chairman
[1:42:36] i yield back thank you that's always helpful when when the states will give some money put some skin
[1:42:41] in the game it's always helpful for us mr angular thank you chairman womack and ranking member cliburn
[1:42:47] and thank you mr secretary for being back here before us today mr secretary i was disappointed to see
[1:42:53] the fy 27 pbr lack of critical funding for the la olympic and paralympic games which will be held
[1:43:00] uh in southern california where mrs torres and i represent president trump touted the games at the
[1:43:06] state of the union this year and don't worry i stood up and clapped uh when he mentioned it i know you
[1:43:12] guys thank you for that i know you guys monitor that sometimes uh so you can roll the tape i had a decent
[1:43:17] seat uh and you yourself have called these america's games uh yet the budget request doesn't reflect that
[1:43:23] enthusiasm for historical context a republican controlled congress provided 2.1 billion dollars
[1:43:30] in inflation adjusted numbers for the 2002 salt lake city winter games while i was glad to see the t hud
[1:43:37] bill we marked up this morning included 875 million dollars for la28 thank you chairman womack it's an
[1:43:45] improvement from last year uh despite the offset that we have concerns about it still falls short of
[1:43:50] what's needed to showcase our country on the world stage uh mr strong talked about local uh impact and
[1:43:58] local skin in the game uh the funding uh that we have proposed uh pales in comparison to the 17 billion
[1:44:05] dollars our regional stakeholders have already invested in their own funds uh so we have that skin
[1:44:12] in the game i wanted to ask a few specific questions first will you and the administration commit to
[1:44:18] supporting la28 with the similar federal backing that u.s hosted games have received in the past
[1:44:24] so obviously every community is different and all the needs are different but to your question i think
[1:44:30] is do you are you going to lean in and support the olympics in la and the answer to that is yes i was
[1:44:35] actually you know they're in 28 right you know they're coming up okay coming up and i know that the the
[1:44:39] the the the group from la was here today and wanted to meet um and our team meets quite a bit with them
[1:44:45] i'm here with you so i didn't meet with them but uh yeah no i i we want to listen this is not la it is
[1:44:51] but it's america like we're showcasing america in um and i think this is the point you're making as well
[1:44:56] beyond the security component of the olympics which is the biggest part of it the second biggest thing
[1:45:01] is transportation and making sure we don't i don't want you to have gridlock that's reflects poorly on
[1:45:07] all of us i want i want a seamless system we have to work with lax we have to you know i think is it
[1:45:12] archer is going to do the evital's but making sure we have the amount of money necessary for transit
[1:45:17] bringing buses in bringing drivers in having mechanics in to to make the flow happen i i commit
[1:45:22] to working with you to make that happen and with this committee because this reflects on all of us
[1:45:27] to what level is dot coordinating and working you just mentioned obviously the two big components are
[1:45:32] the transportation and buses and and the homeland side on the security um so what efforts are underway to
[1:45:40] to to to work closely between those two agencies so art art us in a homeland yeah you know oh there's
[1:45:46] a with regional stakeholders and and transit operators there's a task force that's all working together
[1:45:52] with the different um uh aspects of the federal government with the olympics um but then we also
[1:45:58] specifically meet with the olympics uh and what we use our role is technical assistance for the most part
[1:46:06] they're on the ground um telling us their needs what their thought process is on on the routes and
[1:46:11] the plan and what streets are open what's what's closed and we provide assistance in how they're
[1:46:16] thinking through they're going to operate the transit system for the games and do you feel about
[1:46:21] that you got to get both the paralympics as well right after exactly yeah i mentioned the paralympics
[1:46:25] so you didn't question um uh and and your commitment is to push whatever whatever resources
[1:46:31] this committee comes up with uh whatever that top line number is your commitment is to get that out
[1:46:37] the door in advance realizing you know this is this is coming up i mean this isn't just you know planning
[1:46:43] money out in the future and based on where we have been historically we are we are behind i'll shake
[1:46:48] hands with you if you want and i commit to getting you already offered your text your you know for us to
[1:46:52] text you and nobody i'll tell you to be honest nobody on this side has your has your number of
[1:46:56] detects so it's very kind of you to offer just just for just for clarity i get more texts from
[1:47:01] democrats than my friends on the republican side of the aisle on projects so i'll just nobody on this
[1:47:06] committee so that's fine maybe that's good you know congress and this gets a little friend group
[1:47:10] sometimes and maybe yeah exactly but i i i might text you back though that's the problem i have your
[1:47:17] number two i don't but no i i commit to working with you and i i'll get the money out and i want
[1:47:22] these games and as you you i think you quoted the president he he also recognizes that
[1:47:26] he's in office when these games go off we want to showcase the country and just even with i mean
[1:47:31] you have big fifa games uh coming as well which i think if i can make it out i want to come to
[1:47:36] the games on the 12th is the 12th in la i don't know i'm gonna be here so i don't know um it's a friday
[1:47:43] anyway i we've sent money there too to all the different communities that you all you gave us 100
[1:47:47] million dollars and we've divvied that up based on all all the number of games each of the communities
[1:47:53] have and i think you had nine million dollars in la for the games i think that's right for transit
[1:47:58] you know we have to make these you know games work as you mentioned i appreciate you you know
[1:48:03] we agree these are america's games yeah um we want to make sure that uh they're adequately
[1:48:08] resourcing we get the money out the door so i appreciate it thank you mr chairman if you stick
[1:48:11] around i'll give you my number thank you thank you mr siskamani bring us home honey thank you chairman
[1:48:18] secretary good to see you good to see you too thank you for being here i know you know arizona well
[1:48:22] we'd love to have you back uh where your schedule permits there's some great things to see that i
[1:48:27] want to show you there but the first one that i want to talk about is bus safety and i think you
[1:48:32] you know as briefly touched on a second ago um growing up in in tucson my my dad was a bus driver
[1:48:38] so he drove buses for first for the school district and then he drove buses for the city for
[1:48:43] for suntran so ensuring that those behind the wheel of a bus um full of people feel safe and
[1:48:48] secure is the top priority of mine for the bus drivers themselves but also for the the people
[1:48:54] that they're carrying in the bus since 2020 the city of tucson has operated under a no fares on buses
[1:49:00] and uh this has led to an increase in assaults on bus drivers a tremendous increase actually i want to
[1:49:07] give you a few headlines here of examples of what i'm talking about in july of 2022 this is the
[1:49:13] headline female suntran driver assaulted at tohana odom bus terminal on june 28th of 2025 this was the
[1:49:21] headline suntran bus driver assaulted by a knife wielding man on september of 20 september 9th of
[1:49:27] 2025 bus driver assaulted as a suspect through rocks at the driver the suspect got off the bus and jumped
[1:49:33] onto another bus in the same direction these are just a few examples uh we're seeing hundreds of
[1:49:39] disturbing reports like this all over the country not just in tucson can you update us on your agency's
[1:49:45] efforts to stop cities like the city of tucson from putting our transit operators in harm's way so
[1:49:52] first i was a bus driver myself um that's where i first got my commercial driver's license um seven
[1:49:58] months uh so and i take i take your point uh seriously what i i i don't have a lot of authority
[1:50:06] right but you to your point um one of the greatest success stories has been in san francisco they stopped
[1:50:12] fair evasion on their subway and crime plummeted and there's a correlation if you just open if you
[1:50:18] open the systems up um you start to see more crime and the criminal element come in and i can't i can't
[1:50:25] leverage the the city to do the right thing but hopefully the community would step up and look at
[1:50:31] the data and you know push their leaders to to to stop some of the uh the policies that are not helping
[1:50:39] but inhibiting safety well this is definitely no question uh a majority responsibility on the or
[1:50:46] actually all responsibility on the local um city council and mayor and decisions there to make these
[1:50:52] fares basically free and and having the consequences that i just talked about i do want to explore
[1:50:58] different ways you mentioned the word leverage different ways that we can at a at a federal level
[1:51:03] also uh try to impact this because it's it's a safety issue as you mentioned i mean you have you
[1:51:08] have cdl holder my my dad was as well before he retired this is a serious issue and it's getting
[1:51:13] worse so i i want to i do want to explore ways that we can probably look at something there that we that
[1:51:19] we could do we we have to i have to explore every avenue when uh when my the the the city where i
[1:51:24] live in and the major city in my district is not it's not going to go the right direction uh we need
[1:51:28] help i i appreciate you bringing up the safety on on our buses and our just the transit system
[1:51:34] it's too much i think our country deserves better our people deserve better and it takes leadership
[1:51:40] and it's hard to you know we don't want to do the leadership that's not federal leadership the
[1:51:44] communities need to lean in and serve people better and we have to say this is this is for people
[1:51:51] moving from point a to point b and if we have a homelessness problem well transit's not the place
[1:51:56] for let's deal with homelessness but let's not put them on transit let's not put criminals on transit
[1:52:02] you have to reserve that for the good people who pay for it that need it i would take the bus um when i
[1:52:07] was a kid uh to and from one of the first high school that i attended after football practice and you
[1:52:12] know late in the evening i i you know that's not something that kids do anymore that you just can't
[1:52:16] you're not not safe in that just a minute left i'm gonna drop this question real quick you already
[1:52:22] kind of talked about there's a terminal radar approach control facility tracon on davis mountain
[1:52:26] air force base um i've heard directly from the air force traffic controllers working there about the
[1:52:32] deterioration of the tower along with unsafe outdated work equipment um would adot be willing to look into
[1:52:38] the infrastructure needs here uh of of what we were seeing on the on the air traffic controlling
[1:52:43] overall i would i would welcome that just the needs are so great um and we just we're getting out 1.7
[1:52:51] billion dollars that we had that that money is moving some of the towers are not ready to to take
[1:52:56] it but um i'd be happy to work with you but there's a huge need that's gonna you guys are gonna have to
[1:53:00] deal with in the out years here and everybody has a problem by the way congressman cladburn's getting money
[1:53:05] for his airport the air traffic controllers work hard and i think this is one of the most bipartisan
[1:53:10] issues we'll find we all need this and uh we're glad to work with you on that mr chairman i yield
[1:53:14] back two seconds american safety thank you mr siskamani and that completes our round of questions i'm
[1:53:21] going to uh before i close yield to my friend the ranking member for any closing comments he'd like to
[1:53:26] me jim well thank you very much mr chairman and thank you mr secretary for being here you know i um
[1:53:35] i'm a great level of history i am not proud of all of our history but i love uh all of it in south
[1:53:46] carolina we have uh three national heritage corridors uh the south mountain national heritage corridor
[1:53:55] the gulligichi heritage corridor that's the low country uh and we have the uh we call a southern
[1:54:07] campaign heritage corridor that's a southern campaign of the revolutionary wall i don't want
[1:54:13] you all to mistake our reputation for having started the civil war i um i studied this civil war
[1:54:22] but i don't uh i'm not proud of the heritage so you're invited to south carolina because all these
[1:54:28] heritage corridors uh or or in south carolina though i don't know what congressional district
[1:54:33] they're in and for another week or so uh but i would love to see a tour uh like you've conducted to
[1:54:44] bring attention to the real history of this country uh i think if you consider a trip like that to uh
[1:54:54] one of all three of these heritage corridors it would be welcome in south carolina and i think it would
[1:54:59] have you come down and bring some attention to it i think your road trip will do that for us i don't
[1:55:31] look forward to doing that sometime in november congressman can i just quickly 30 seconds um
[1:55:38] i'm not i can't tell you what and where the road trip went but they could have gone to charleston
[1:55:43] and they could have gone to the uh uh the the marina there that goes from the mountains all the way down
[1:55:49] through um into the ocean and it's uh it's a it's a beautiful place and i'll i'll take you up on your
[1:55:54] invitation and you but just if i can make one last point you're the infrastructure needs of south
[1:55:58] carolina you mentioned the growth of south carolina uh it's per capita not total growth but per capita
[1:56:03] growth it's it's huge and uh there's there's real needs of of uh roads and even evacuation routes
[1:56:10] in south carolina thank you thank you i'm not sure where all the road show went but if in fact it didn't
[1:56:19] go certain places where you've been invited and the road show comes back understand you will be
[1:56:26] welcomed with open arms and without any criticism from this panel there's there's no season two i'll
[1:56:35] guarantee you that there's we appreciate you thank you very much
[1:56:42] you will be most welcome in the great northwest arkansas the chair detects that we have a few
[1:56:47] interns that are in the audience here today uh maximizing their opportunity to see government in
[1:56:54] action from a very practical standpoint mr secretary if you would when this is over today
[1:57:00] if you would stay for just a moment give these kids an opportunity to engage you in conversation
[1:57:06] maybe take a picture i would love that it'd be wonderful our time is concluded i want to thank
[1:57:11] everybody for being here today there may be some members who have remaining questions that they need
[1:57:18] answered and if that's the case submit those questions for the record please do so promptly
[1:57:22] secretary duffy again thank you for your time it's an honor and a privilege to have you here we
[1:57:27] look forward to working with you as we complete the fy27 t hud appropriations process and with that
[1:57:32] our subcommittee is adjourned thank you mr chairman