Sachchi Mainali Testifies on Naresh Bhatt's Pre-Arrest Interview (FULL) — — Mamta Kafle Bhatt Trial

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Please state and spell your full name for the court and for the jury. [00:00:05] Manali: My name is Sachi Mainali. My last name is M-A-I-N-A-L-I. [00:00:14] Speaker 1: And how do you also spell your first name? [00:00:17] Manali: My first name is spelled as S-A-C-H-C-H-I. [00:00:25] Speaker 1: S-A-C-H-C-H-I. Thank you. Sure. Could you tell us where were you born? [00:00:33] Manali: I was born in Nepal. [00:00:34] Speaker 1: And when did you come to the United States? [00:00:37] Manali: I came to the United States in 2007. [00:00:42] Speaker 1: Did you go to school in Nepal? [00:00:45] Manali: Yes. [00:00:47] Speaker 1: Would you explain for the jury your educational background? [00:00:52] Manali: I completed my schooling through 12th grade in Nepal. I then completed my bachelor's from New Delhi, India. Later, I received a scholarship for an MBA program in Istanbul, Turkey. But I did not complete that program. [00:01:09] Speaker 1: Ms. Mainali, I can hear you fine. I'm not sure all the members of the jury can. So if you could, please just project as well as you can. I'm not sure. [00:01:16] Manali: Sure. Do you want me to repeat that? [00:01:23] Speaker 1: Yes, please. [00:01:24] Manali: I completed my schooling through 12th grade in Nepal. I then completed my bachelor's from New Delhi, India. Later, I received a scholarship for an MBA in Istanbul, Turkey. But I did not complete that program. [00:01:42] Speaker 1: Ms. Mainali, are you an independent journalist? [00:01:46] Manali: Yes, I am. [00:01:48] Speaker 1: And do you conduct your independent withdrawing? Do you conduct journalistic interviews within the Nepalese community? [00:01:58] Speaker 3: Overruled. [00:02:04] Speaker 1: And do you conduct journalism within specific communities? [00:02:09] Manali: In the Nepali community, yes. [00:02:11] Speaker 1: The Nepali community. Do you host a online web page program? [00:02:23] Manali: I host a live interview program called Sachiko Satma, which means with Sachi. That is, that streams on social media platforms, including Facebook and YouTube. [00:02:38] Speaker 1: Could you explain for the jury a little bit more about your journalist experience? [00:02:45] Manali: My media experience started in 1992 in Nepal when I was at the 8th grade from children's rights program. I continued that through 2002, even when I was studying at India. I used to do it when I used to go back home. And later, my real journalism started reporting, interviewing, and all that, writing articles and all. [00:03:14] Speaker 1: Through your experience as an independent journalist, could you explain for the jury the types of people or professionals that you've conducted interviews with? [00:03:29] Manali: I'm just talking about for this program, you mean? Just for with Sachi, right? Not like my journalism career before. [00:03:36] Speaker 1: No, I'd like to get a little bit more background on your overall experience as a journalist. [00:03:40] Manali: I have interviewed leaders, sitting prime minister of Nepal. I have interviewed spiritual leaders, attorneys, and in public-related matters, the concerned, you know, people, victims, family members. Yeah, in other areas, like, mostly I remember that, yeah. And leaders, political leaders. [00:04:08] Speaker 1: Have you received any honors for your journalistic work? [00:04:13] Manali: I have received. In the United States, I have received for bringing marginalized voice, being voiced for the voiceless. I have received from multiple media, yeah. [00:04:33] Speaker 1: Your Honor, I'm going to have... It says... It's an eight-page document. It's double-sided, so in total it's 16 marked pages, have marked for identification as Commonwealth Exhibit 327-A-1. And I provided a copy to counsel already. Okay. Permission to approach the witness. You may. Can you take a look at that document and let us know if that is familiar to you? [00:05:24] Manali: Yes, it's my CV. [00:05:26] Speaker 1: That's your curriculum vitae? [00:05:28] Manali: Yes. [00:05:29] Speaker 1: And it's double-sided and it has your experience? [00:05:34] Manali: It is, yes. [00:05:35] Speaker 1: Is that a true and accurate representation of your curriculum vitae as an independent journalist? [00:05:41] Manali: Yes. [00:05:42] Speaker 1: Your Honor, I offer that to evidence as Commonwealth Exhibit 327-A-1. [00:05:47] Speaker 4: And no objection. All right, without objection, that will be received. [00:05:50] Speaker 1: Ms. Manali, did you have an opportunity to interview with a person by the name of Naresh Bhatt? [00:06:10] Manali: Yes, I did. [00:06:12] Speaker 1: When did you interview with Naresh Bhatt? [00:06:16] Manali: August 18, 2024. [00:06:19] Speaker 1: Do you see Naresh Bhatt in the courtroom at this time? [00:06:22] Manali: Um, he's sitting right there. [00:06:24] Speaker 1: Could you just identify him on an article of clothing as well? [00:06:27] Manali: Uh, blue shirt, I think green suit, green coat. [00:06:31] Speaker 1: Your Honor, for the record, the witnesses identified the defendant, Naresh Bhatt. [00:06:34] Speaker 4: The record will reflect that. [00:06:38] Speaker 1: Ms. Manali, your interview that you conducted with the defendant, was that recorded? [00:06:44] Manali: Was that what? [00:06:45] Speaker 1: Was it recorded? [00:06:46] Manali: Uh, it was a Facebook Live broadcast, but it was simultaneously recorded through StreamYard. [00:06:53] Speaker 1: Your Honor, I'm going to have a thumb drive marked for identification as 327-A-2. [00:07:12] Speaker 4: Okay. [00:07:17] Speaker 1: I'm showing you a thumb drive marked for identification at this time as 327-A-2. Have you reviewed the contents of that thumb drive? [00:07:29] Manali: Yes, I had. [00:07:30] Speaker 1: What's on that thumb drive? [00:07:32] Manali: Uh, it's, um, my interview with, uh, Mr. Naresh, uh, on August 18, 2024. Um, this is the, uh, English, English subtitle version. [00:07:43] Speaker 1: And I'm going to come to that. Uh, during your interview with the defendant that was recorded, in what language did you speak with the defendant? [00:07:56] Manali: In Nepali. [00:08:04] Speaker 1: It may seem like a silly question, but how long have you been speaking Nepali or Nepalese? [00:08:09] Manali: Uh, I have been speaking Nepali since my childhood. [00:08:12] Speaker 1: And I asked very respectfully, how long has, how long have you been speaking Nepali? [00:08:18] Manali: Um, like over 47 years. [00:08:22] Speaker 1: Thank you, sorry. When you were growing up in Nepal, was that the exclusive, you, was that the exclusive language you would speak? [00:08:36] Manali: Yes. [00:08:37] Speaker 1: Did you speak Nepali in your home? [00:08:41] Manali: Yes. [00:08:42] Speaker 1: Did you speak Nepali when you went to school? [00:08:45] Manali: Yes, I did. [00:08:46] Speaker 1: Did you speak Nepali when you went to college? [00:08:48] Manali: Uh, when I went to college, I spoke Nepali with my family members and Nepali friends. But the medium of instruction at my college was English. [00:08:58] Speaker 1: At what point in your upbringing did you learn the English language? [00:09:04] Manali: Uh, from school, but mainly our medium of instruction at Nepal was in Nepali. Until I moved to New Delhi, India. [00:09:14] Speaker 1: Do you speak any other language other than Nepali? [00:09:17] Manali: Uh, just English as my second language. [00:09:21] Speaker 1: For your program, approximately how many interviews have you done in the Nepali language? [00:09:29] Manali: Um, I have not, I have never counted exactly, but for this program only, um, I would say over 100 in Nepali language. [00:09:44] Speaker 1: Are you proficient in the Nepali language? [00:09:48] Manali: Uh, Nepali is my native language. I have been speaking Nepali language since my childhood and have been, have used it for my journalism, interviews, writing articles and reporting. [00:10:04] Speaker 1: The interview that you conducted with the defendant on August 18th, 2024. Was that conversation that you had translated into English? [00:10:15] Manali: Yes. [00:10:18] Speaker 1: You mentioned it a little bit earlier in your program, your interview with the defendant. Are there English subtitles? [00:10:25] Manali: Yes. [00:10:26] Speaker 1: Have you listened to that interview and checked that the English subtitles are accurate? [00:10:37] Manali: Uh, I have listened and reviewed the English subtitles for my YouTube version. Uh, it's not word for word translation of Nepali language, but I have checked whether it preserves the overall meaning. Uh, but I'm not a code certified translator. [00:10:58] Speaker 1: The recording that was done between yourself and the rush with the English subtitles. That being the exhibit, that's the exhibit, the thumb drive marks for identification 327 82. Is that a true and accurate recording you had with the defendant on August 18th, 2024? [00:11:19] Manali: Uh, we had, when we had a Facebook live, it was in Nepali language. Uh, this was, uh, subtitle was added later. And, uh, few seconds, the set of footage, like in the beginning, like arranging position and camera has been removed. It's just few seconds on the YouTube version. [00:11:40] Speaker 1: The version that has the added subtitles. Is that a true and accurate recording of your interview in Nepalese? And is it a true and accurate translation from the Nepali language to English? [00:11:57] Manali: Um, it is, it preserves the meaning though it's not word for word translation of Nepali. [00:12:03] Speaker 1: Your honor, with that foundation, I offer that thumb drive into evidence as 327 A2. [00:12:09] Speaker 3: Judge, I'm going to raise an objection now in very specific purpose. There are, in that interview, aspects that I believe are not admissible. It's wide ranging. It's not only the defendant in there. There's a lot of other things that are going on. Mr. Sweet and I discussed this before court today. I think that he agrees with me that those pieces should be stripped out. Um, and so the admissibility from my perspective is contingent on the redactions. [00:12:41] Speaker 1: I concur. I concur, judge. There are parts that will be redacted. The audio will be masked. [00:12:47] Speaker 4: So, but it's not yet. [00:12:48] Speaker 1: It's not yet. So subject to the redactions that council and I will agree to, I offer it at this time so I can play for the jury. And any parts that council and I are agreeing to are not going to be played for the jury at this time. It's just that in its form at this time, it needs to be masked. It needs to be redacted. And I can approach to explain more if that would help the court. [00:13:12] Speaker 4: It's, it's not about how you do it. It's about how the record's preserved. So you're going to admit something into evidence that's not exactly what it should be. [00:13:22] Speaker 1: I'm admitting it subject to redaction. [00:13:27] Speaker 4: You have an objection to it being admitted subject to redaction. [00:13:30] Speaker 3: So, I don't know what that means exactly for purposes of preserving the record. [00:13:37] Speaker 4: So we've done that before on papers, right? Back in the day where we would just take a Sharpie afterwards and then make a photocopy and then you'd have it. I think it's possible. It's a little messy, but it's possible. [00:13:50] Speaker 3: The additional problem with this is because it's closed captioned, you can't just, you can't just mute over portions of it. They have to be actually either blacked out or removed because the conversations that don't have Mr. Bob in them, they're still closed captioning of all of them. That's my worry. It's not like just taking, like some of it's going to have to be pulled out in order for, it's going to have to be something completely different. [00:14:18] Speaker 4: Are you planning on playing this right now? [00:14:20] Speaker 1: Not in its entirety. And I have a redaction studio where I can mask what's being said and mask the subtitles underneath, Judge. This can be done. And it will be done. And I do so at my peril as well. I don't intend to introduce anything that I'm agreeing to that should not be published for the jury. I know what those sections are. I talked about it with Ms. Lennox. I intend to highlight specific portions that do not talk about the parts that Ms. Lennox is going to object to. [00:14:52] Speaker 4: Well, why would we not just admit it later when you have it already redacted? [00:14:57] Speaker 1: I want to play it while Ms. Manali is here, Judge. [00:15:04] Speaker 4: I think you run, I understand that, but you run the risk of playing something that's inadmissible. [00:15:08] Speaker 1: That's completely on me, Judge. And if I... [00:15:11] Speaker 4: But it's not. If it's inadmissible, it has a chance of being harmful to the defense. I'm not creating error here, Mr. Sweet, and just blaming it on the Commonwealth. [00:15:22] Speaker 1: Judge, I understand where Ms. Lennox... And I agree with her, there are parts that are... Should not be and will not be played before the jury. The parts that I've highlighted are not the parts that are going to be objected to. I could approach and explain more, Judge. Approach. [00:15:52] Speaker ?: I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:15] Speaker 4: I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:27] Speaker ?: I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:29] Speaker 1: I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:35] Speaker 4: I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:39] Speaker ?: I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:41] Speaker 1: I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:51] Speaker 3: I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:17:52] Speaker 1: I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:18:00] Manali: I'm not going to be able to do that. [00:18:01] Speaker 1: I did not know either of them prior to your interview with the defendant. Were there any threats or coercion for him to sit with you virtually and have this interview? [00:18:15] Manali: No, he spoke voluntarily. [00:18:19] Speaker 1: And again, the entire interview between yourself and the defendant was in Nepali. [00:18:26] Manali: Yes. [00:18:31] Speaker 1: During your interview, did you ask the defendant when was the last time he saw his wife, Manta? [00:18:43] Manali: I did. [00:18:46] Speaker 1: What was the date the defendant told you that he last saw his wife, Manta? [00:18:54] Manali: He said when we were interviewing, he said it was Wednesday. Initially, he didn't remember the date. And during interview, I just checked my calendar and told him that, yes, it was July 31st was Wednesday. [00:19:09] Speaker 1: You told him July 31st. [00:19:12] Manali: When he kept saying it was Wednesday, when I asked about the date, he did mention about having dinner together. And that they ate what Manta had brought from the riverside watercrasse. And then he took her, his daughter, their daughter, infant daughter upstairs while Manta was downstairs doing her chores. Then I asked again that, what was the date? He said it was Wednesday. So when we were speaking, I checked the calendar the Wednesday before our interview, and that was July 31st. And I told that to him in the interview. [00:19:53] Speaker 1: Was there a discussion with the defendant with regards to the sleeping arrangements on that Wednesday, July 31st? [00:19:59] Manali: He said Manta had to go to work early next morning, August 1st. So she slept in a different room. [00:20:11] Speaker 1: So she slept in a different room. Was there a discussion as to what time Manta may have returned after she finished her work on that next date, August 1st? [00:20:35] Manali: He said on August 1st, she was scheduled to work and then returned directly home around dinner time between 7:30 to 8:30 PM. [00:20:47] Speaker 1: Was there a discussion about what, if anything, the defendant did on August 1st, when Manta did not come home? [00:20:57] Manali: He said when Manta did not come home, he tried calling her, but her call went to voicemail. He then drove around with her daughter to a neighbor's house, and he looked at the neighbor's house from outside. And then he did not see her there, see her there, but saw other people from outside. And then he drove back home. [00:21:33] Speaker 1: The defendant described what it is he did after he got back on that evening. [00:21:41] Manali: He said since he did not see her there, he told me that he did not go outside. And I asked him, how did you see him then? He said the house was, he just said that the house was transparent. He saw some other people inside, other people inside, but he did not see her. He drove back home. He thought for a moment, he thought for just a few moments what might have happened to Manta. And then he tried calling her, it again went to voicemail. He boiled milk for her daughter, and then he attended to her. And then he fell asleep with the thought that she might return home. [00:22:31] Speaker 1: And then he had questions about what, if anything, he may have done on August 2nd, 2024. [00:22:40] Manali: He did not tell me that he called the police or did anything, but he told me that the her workplace initiated the police wellness check and the officers came home. Was there any discussion about what the defendant may or may not have done? [00:23:22] Speaker 1: What the defendant may have done after the police conducted this wellness check for Manta? [00:23:28] Manali: Could he rephrase that? Sure. [00:23:30] Speaker 1: Did the defendant say to you anything that he may have done after the police did their wellness check? [00:23:39] Manali: No. During the interview, he told me that he did not, he had not taken any initiative from August 1st. When the officers came to the house on August 2nd, he just followed whatever they said, whatever the officers said to him, he did not. To accept those calls that he made, which I told earlier, he did not do anything else. [00:24:07] Speaker 1: Was there any discussion about there being a 48-hour? [00:24:11] Manali: Yes. He said that, though he was not sure whether that's the rule, he said that he had heard from somewhere that there is a 48-hour waiting period before a missing person report can be filed. So, yeah, he just heard that, but he was not sure whether that was the rule. [00:24:33] Speaker 1: Did you ask the defendant if there was any arguments or reasons for why Manta may have left? [00:24:39] Manali: I asked him actually multiple times whether anything unusual had happened between them during, like, before the 31st, any fight or quarrel they had, which might have led to the situation. He said that since their big fight in February 2024, when Manta stayed outside at her friend's house, they did not have even, like, small arguments or not even positive fights in his language. They didn't have arguments at all since April 2024. [00:25:19] Speaker 1: Ms. Manali, did you ask the defendant any questions whether he searched for security cameras? [00:25:26] Manali: I did ask him that question multiple times. He denied that he went to the neighbors' doors, knocking at the neighbors' doors for the security for days. [00:25:40] Speaker 1: When you say he denied that he went looking for the meeting, he's indicating he did not do it? [00:25:45] Manali: He did not, because committee members had urged him to ask for the CCTV camera on August 6th, as per the information I had, and then I asked him to respond to that. He denied that anybody asked, you know, him to knock the door, and he also denied that he did not go knocking at the door to the neighbors. For the security for the CCTV footage, but he did say that there was one neighbor who came to the door while he was going to the Costco, going to the Costco, but at that time, he asked that neighbor about the CCTV camera, but not to other neighbors. [00:26:28] Speaker ?: Yes. [00:26:29] Speaker 1: Did you speak with the defendant with regards to text message exchanges he may have had with a person named Sunita Bhandari? [00:26:42] Manali: Yes. Actually, I read that message in my interview as well. Do you recall a specific message at this time that you read to the defendant in the early morning hours of August 4th? When he was constantly telling me that there was not even an argument or no positive fight since April, I brought this text because this text was August 4th. And he had written, we decided to separate respectfully, we don't even argue, Manta wanted to move New York or Texas, so when he kept saying that they didn't have arguments, then I brought up that text and then read it to him. [00:27:37] Speaker 1: Did you ask the defendant questions about a citizenship interview Manta had on August 5th, 2024? [00:27:47] Manali: Yes. I did ask him whether Manta had a citizenship interview on August 5th. He said that he did not know about that, even though he said he had helped her edit and verify the documents a few weeks earlier. But he had heard from the people, but he didn't know that she had interviewed on August 5th. [00:28:10] Speaker 1: Did you ask the defendant about him joining the community's search and efforts to find Manta? [00:28:18] Manali: I did. I asked him why hadn't he joined public searches and protest demanding answers. [00:28:27] Speaker 1: And what did the defendant say about that? [00:28:30] Manali: He said he was alone and his private baby is a priority and he was dealing with the police as well. So that was his priority, he said. [00:28:47] Speaker 1: Ms. Manali, did you ask the defendant directly if he had done anything to Manta? [00:28:53] Manali: Yes. At the end, I first asked him, you didn't do anything to Manta, right? And then I asked him, after that I asked him, was there any fight or quarrel that might have led to the situation? And then finally, I asked him, you have not hidden her or kept her somewhere against her rule, right? [00:29:21] Speaker 1: Your Honor, may I publish specific portions of 327A to the jury at this time? [00:29:33] Speaker 5: And then I asked him, I asked him, you know, to be a man. [00:29:34] Speaker ?: I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. I asked him, you know, to be a man. [00:30:36] Speaker 1: And judge at this time, this recording is two hours and 10 minutes. There are going to be portions of it that will be redacted and masked from the jury. Jury's ability to see. We'll deal with that subject to connection when Ms. Lennox and I confer about it. I don't intend to play this two hour video. I'm just going to identify clips for the Commonwealth's case. [00:31:30] Speaker ?: Pause for a second. [00:31:31] Manali: Can you explain for the jury, the, what's on the screen right now? Explain for who's who. [00:31:38] Speaker ?: Um, in yellow t-shirt it's Mr. Neres and that's me. [00:31:38] Manali: So on the right side of the screen, in the yellow t-shirt you said that's the rest, the defendant. On the left side of the screen, that's you. [00:31:42] Speaker ?: Yes. [00:31:42] Manali: Okay. There appears to be some Nepali writing. [00:31:46] Speaker ?: Um, could you just tell us what that says. [00:31:47] Speaker 1: That says. Uh, the one on Raiden. Uh, on the one on Raiden. Uh, the one on Raiden. [00:31:51] Speaker ?: Uh, can you explain for the jury? [00:31:52] Speaker 1: Um, can you explain for the jury the, what's on the screen right now? [00:31:55] Manali: Um, in yellow t-shirt it's Mr. Neres and that's me. Yes. [00:32:00] Speaker 1: And that's me. So on the right side of the screen. In the yellow t-shirt you said that's the rest, the defendant on the left side of the screen. That's you. Yes. Okay. There appears to be some Nepali writing in the background. Could you just tell us what that says? [00:32:15] Manali: That says, uh, the one on Raiden. Uh, white says Satchiko Satma, which means with Satchi. And on, in English it says with Satchi Manali. That means with Satchi. The program name is with Satchi in English. [00:32:28] Speaker 1: With Satchi, that's going to be the red and white writing above. Yeah, that's in Nepali. And that's in Nepali language. Yeah. Okay. [00:32:35] Speaker ?: Thank you. Thank you. [00:32:37] Manali: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. uh [00:33:12] Speaker ?: uh [00:33:34] Manali: uh uh uh uh uh uh uh [00:35:18] Speaker 6: uh [00:35:32] Manali: uh [00:35:46] Speaker 1: assist with the record i started at zero i'm now at two minutes and 57 seconds i'm going to skip forward uh [00:36:06] Speaker ?: i'm starting at 16 minutes and 47 seconds [00:36:26] Speaker 1: i'm starting at 16 minutes and 47 seconds [00:36:38] Speaker 6: uh [00:36:50] Manali: uh uh [00:37:06] Speaker 6: uh uh uh uh uh uh [00:38:30] Manali: uh [00:38:44] Speaker 6: uh uh [00:38:48] Manali: uh [00:38:50] Speaker 6: uh uh uh uh uh uh [00:39:16] Speaker ?: uh [00:39:16] Speaker 6: uh [00:39:18] Manali: uh uh uh uh uh [00:39:28] Speaker 6: uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh [00:40:22] Manali: uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh [00:41:08] Speaker 6: uh uh uh [00:41:26] Manali: uh uh uh uh [00:41:34] Speaker 6: uh uh [00:41:54] Manali: uh uh uh uh [00:42:02] Speaker 6: uh [00:42:04] Manali: Thank you. [00:42:34] Speaker 6: Thank you. [00:43:04] Manali: Thank you. [00:43:34] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. [00:44:33] Speaker 1: I'm starting again at 25 minutes and 50 seconds. [00:45:03] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. [00:46:33] Speaker 1: Thank you. [00:47:03] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. [00:48:03] Manali: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. [00:49:33] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. [00:50:33] Manali: Thank you. [00:51:03] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. [00:52:03] Manali: Thank you. [00:52:33] Speaker 1: Thank you. [00:53:03] Manali: Thank you. [00:53:33] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. [00:56:03] Manali: Thank you. [00:56:33] Speaker 6: Thank you. [00:57:03] Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you. [00:58:03] Manali: Thank you. [00:58:33] Speaker 4: Thank you. [00:59:03] Speaker 6: Thank you. [00:59:33] Manali: Thank you. [01:00:03] Speaker 6: Thank you. [01:00:33] Manali: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. [01:02:33] Speaker 6: Thank you. [01:03:03] Manali: Thank you. Thank you. [01:04:03] Speaker 1: Thank you. [01:04:33] Speaker 5: Thank you. Thank you. [01:05:33] Speaker 1: Thank you. [01:06:03] Manali: Thank you. [01:06:33] Speaker 6: Thank you. [01:07:03] Manali: Thank you. [01:07:33] Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you. [01:08:33] Speaker ?: Thank you. [01:09:03] Speaker 1: Thank you. [01:09:33] Speaker 3: Thank you. [01:10:03] Manali: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. [01:11:33] Speaker 3: Thank you. Thank you. [01:12:32] Manali: Thank you. Thank you. [01:13:32] Speaker 3: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. [01:16:02] Manali: Thank you. [01:16:32] Speaker 3: Thank you. Thank you. [01:17:32] Manali: Thank you. [01:18:02] Speaker 1: Thank you. [01:18:32] Manali: Thank you.