About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of No agreement on Iran’s nuclear program : Analysis, published April 17, 2026. The transcript contains 1,243 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"well i'm now joined in the studio by hassan ahmadian he's an associate professor at the university of tehran good to have you with me here in the studio so professor first of all let's take apart some of these lines that have been dropping fast and furious in the last couple of hours donald trump..."
[0:00] well i'm now joined in the studio by hassan ahmadian he's an associate professor at the
[0:05] university of tehran good to have you with me here in the studio so professor first of all
[0:09] let's take apart some of these lines that have been dropping fast and furious in the last couple
[0:13] of hours donald trump saying iran has agreed to suspend its nuclear program indefinitely how
[0:22] likely is it that iran has agreed in in your understanding to suspend its entire nuclear
[0:28] program indefinitely there's nothing that has been agreed so far on the nuclear program but why then
[0:36] would the u.s president make this kind of statement if iran is is iran going to come out and say we
[0:41] haven't done this i think the negotiations that are uh to uh basically restart uh with the mediation of
[0:48] pakistan are about this so there's no negotiations now that he basically forced the ceasefire which was
[0:57] uh supposed to happen and you know parallel to iran's ceasefire it was a regional ceasefire
[1:04] agreement with the unfreezing of iranian assets for iran to that's what the mediator of pakistan
[1:10] said yes in their understanding iran and pakistan said so but uh israel violated it and so iran said
[1:17] that wartime situation in the hormuz will continue now with the ceasefire in lebanon talks of unfreezing
[1:25] iran's assets the uh strait of hormuz being dealt with differently by iran not that different we'll
[1:31] talk in a minute about the strait of hormuz but i want to finish first these lines about what donald
[1:36] trump is saying has been agreed and he's saying we will go in at a leisurely pace to recover uranium
[1:41] which we think refers to the 60 plus enriched uranium again how likely or from your understanding
[1:48] is it that iran will agree to allow us i guess forces to go in and recover enriched uranium to
[1:58] that degree yeah i wanted to get to this point so so far nuclear is uh subject to discussion there's no
[2:04] agreement on anything on the nuclear file right there are ideas uh mediated by pakistan back and
[2:11] forth between and iran the united states but there's no agreement i can say that with certainty
[2:17] but iran basically has a red line on its nuclear program you can't just ask it to indefinitely freeze
[2:25] its enrichment because that's a right it has in accordance with international law with the treaty
[2:30] the non-none the mpt basically and so it's not willing to give it up uh and i think him talking about
[2:40] iran giving up its uranium is also unrealistic the iranians came up with ideas before the war
[2:47] and i think they are sticking with those ideas that's what i was going to say it was reported
[2:51] before the war through the omani mediators that there had been a breakthrough in handing over the
[2:56] plus 60 percent enriched uranium it's not handing over it's bringing it down diluting it to 20 percent
[3:04] and then to 3.67 percent which is uh for peaceful purposes only according to the the iaea and so so you
[3:15] don't think it's realistic that the that they will now agree to the u.s going in there and taking
[3:20] there's there there's a threshold to getting into an agreement on this okay for two reasons the iranians
[3:28] are saying this is our right and second they they are not that they don't have that much of stockpile
[3:34] to give this off and then when the united states violates its its commitments then to enrich again they
[3:41] don't have much uranium so it's not all right let's talk let's talk about the straits of hormuz and the
[3:46] u.s president also saying iran has agreed to never close the straits of hormuz again again how likely is
[3:51] that do you think well that's i think depends on how the united states acts basically when there was
[3:58] agreement as i said they violated it in two basic uh you know points lebanon and then the unfreezing of
[4:06] assets iran also said we are not bound to it now if the united states it's to is to violate its
[4:13] commitments i can see that the iranians will also go back to where they were well he's already saying
[4:20] that iran will not receive any frozen funds from the u.s so is it likely that the iranians will take
[4:26] that step without any promise of unfreezing their assets i can't imagine a scenario in which the iranians
[4:33] would have done so without you know receiving promises from the mediators that this will happen
[4:39] because that was a package offered to iran and iran accepted it and based on it started dealing
[4:46] with the united states indirectly through pakistan and went to the negotiations now that iran is
[4:52] announcing that the situation in the strait is changing i can imagine that there is a an agreement
[4:58] on this so i'm listening to everything you're saying professor and this is what i'm wondering now
[5:02] it basically sounds like you're saying pretty much everything that the u.s president has announced
[5:07] is not accurate is not correct why are we not hearing anything from the iranian side i think
[5:12] that silence tell us something well the the silence is basically uh not that uh weird when it comes to
[5:19] tehran because they they're not uh within uh the mood of president trump who just basically comes out and
[5:27] you know gives different announcements i suspect that the iranians will come out with uh with their
[5:33] narrative there have been some points right or you know being raised by uh people in tehran but it's
[5:40] the official line it's friday today so you will hear more this new maritime shall we call it arrangement
[5:50] is iran going to be able to enforce that long term without the objections of other states because
[5:55] it it pushes the maritime traffic into iranian territorial waters does that not violate the un
[6:01] convention on the law of the seas articles 37 to 39 that talk about the right of unimpeded passage for
[6:08] ships yeah sure you see if you put it in that light of course but the reality is that the deepest
[6:16] road goes through iran's territorial water so iran is not changing the route for that purpose it
[6:24] doesn't need but before february 28th the ships were not restricted to only that passage i know
[6:29] but there is a change right but the but the ships that are heavy or heavier they usually go through
[6:35] iran's territorial water because it's deeper so they don't need to change anything they can just
[6:41] you know uh in accordance with international law observe what's going in and out and they have said
[6:47] uh what with with the announcement by mr araqji they have said that it's the uh supreme national
[6:54] security council's uh you know announcement that is to be observed firstly that passage is only for
[7:01] innocent uh passage for ships that are commercial or energy related not military and secondly they should
[7:09] be observed by iran's navy all right so it's basically that same announcement that was announced before
[7:15] well i have so many more questions but i'm already being told that the time is up i apologize we're
[7:20] going to have to leave it there professor ahmad uh hassan ahmadian professor from the university
[7:25] of tehran thank you so much for coming in
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →