- House Prosecutors press conference for VP Sara Duterte... (June 23) — GMA News - Replay

[0:00] Good afternoon to our friends from the media. [0:03] Welcome to this press briefing from the House of Representatives. [0:07] Today, we are joined by our House Prosecutors led by Batangas Representative Jervil Jinkibitrix-Lewistro [0:18] and her fellow prosecutor none other than Manila Representative Joel Chua. [0:26] They will provide us with updates and share their perspectives on the ongoing pretrial conference [0:33] for the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte [0:38] as well as other matters related to the impeachment process, after which they will entertain questions from you. [0:44] We thank everyone for being here and for your continued interest in this very important constitutional process. [0:52] Okay, to start our press briefing, may we hear the opening statement of our Chair. [0:57] Good afternoon everyone. [1:00] We would like to give an update as to the impeachment proceeding. [1:08] So, as we all know, ongoing ang ating marking of exhibits. [1:14] And as a matter of fact, we are on day three. [1:17] I wish to share that indeed the documents for confidential fund is really voluminous. [1:26] As a matter of fact, the prosecutors have expressed their uncertainties as to whether the marking will be finished by Thursday. [1:40] And that is why we reached out already to Secretary Bantug through Secretary General Chaloy Grafil, [1:50] whether there are other measures which may be considered to be able to expedite more the process of marking the exhibits. [1:59] We understand that the position of the prosecution is to push through with the original timeline, [2:07] which is likewise pronounced by Secretary Bantug during our PTC. [2:14] And that is on July 6th. [2:17] And that is why we are really reaching out to Senate Secretary to consider additional measures. [2:26] Right now there are four teams who are facilitating the marking of exhibits. [2:34] One is assigned for unexplained wealth. [2:37] And the three other teams are all assigned to confidential fund. [2:43] Regardless of having four teams, the private prosecutors, including the public prosecutors who are monitoring, [2:50] have expressed already their uncertainties about the possibility of finishing until Thursday. [2:58] And that is why we are soliciting for additional measures. [3:03] Kung paano mas bibilis pa. [3:05] And hopefully matapos tayo within this week. [3:09] No? [3:11] And then likewise the prosecution team is discussing about the following concerns. [3:20] Itong isa ay na-share na natin during past interviews. [3:25] The adoption of Filipino language and English language to be the official languages to be used during the impeachment trial. [3:34] That's one. [3:35] Second is we are considering... [3:38] Well, we are still discussing, ah. [3:41] We're still considering about the possible adoption of the rule on disclosure of witnesses at least three days before their presentation. [3:53] No? [3:54] We are also discussing on the possible participation of public and private prosecutor in the presentation of a witness. [4:04] That means that the public and the private will participate in the presentation and conclusion of the testimony of one witness. [4:14] And our BIR box, we are discussing the same as well about the possibility of opening it. [4:23] Of course with the permission of the impeachment court at the soonest possible time. [4:28] So, that would be all for the opening statement. [4:31] You can raise your questions to Kong Joel. [4:34] Alright. [4:37] First question from Vivian. [4:39] Good afternoon, Kongs. [4:44] Dito po sa na-mention ninyo na you're reaching out to the Senate Secretary kung paano po mapapabilis pa itong marking of evidence. [4:52] Ano po yung mga proposed measures ng House? [4:55] At nakausap nyo na rin po ba yung defense about this? [4:58] Well, unang-una, we are contemplating on adding more teams and additional dates. [5:07] So, alam namin na Friday and Saturday walang pasok ang Senado. [5:14] Pero because of these voluminous documents, kinukonsider na rin namin na pati yung Friday tsaka Saturday kung papayagan tayo na magamit na rin. [5:29] Nakausap nyo na po yung defense. Are they amenable to that measure? [5:34] We haven't talked to the defense. [5:36] We actually reached out to Sec Bantog through Secretary General Celoy Grafil. [5:43] So, we don't know kung anong status na anong communication na yun, but definitely we will be communicating with our Sec Gen as to whether the same has been relayed already and as to whether the same has been discussed already with the defense. [5:58] Just to give you an idea how voluminous the exhibits for confidential fund. [6:06] So, for OVP's document evidencing payment, for DepEd, it's 1,900 approximately. [6:13] And then for OVP, it's 2,000 plus. [6:19] And we understand that the defense is soliciting marking on separate document. [6:26] Which means, parehas yung exhibits namin, nevertheless, the position of the defense is to have their own marking in their separate set of documents. [6:39] So, you can imagine how time consuming is this. [6:45] Magkakaroon ng comparison of document before marking, one for the prosecution, and next for the defense. [6:52] And then yung mga na-mention po ninyo na adoption of English and Filipino, rules on the disclosure of witnesses, participation of public and private prosecutors, BIR box opening. [7:10] Nakalaman po ba ito doon sa submission ninyo yesterday? [7:13] We will be finalizing our position regarding those matters and whatever will be the decision of the team, we might be filing a manifestation tomorrow. [7:24] Also, yesterday po, I understand yung deadline for the filing of comments dun sa stipulations ng kabilang kampo. [7:36] Nabasa nyo na po ba yung doon sa submission ng defense and what's your comment on that? [7:42] Well, na-browse lang natin, no? But you will remember na-share na rin sa media, I think yesterday, that our comment to their purposes for which the witnesses are being presented are very general. [8:01] And that is why we are asking for a more specific purpose for the witnesses' presentation. [8:09] Next question, please. [8:17] Good afternoon po, Congresswoman Luistro and Representative Chua and Soberano po of Bombo Radio Philippines. [8:24] Ma'am, sa day 3 po ng pretrial conference, may mga procedural issues na po bang nalinaw o nananatiling pinagtatalunan pa ng defense and prosecution? [8:35] Kung meron po, ano po ito? [8:37] Wala naman po, marking pa lamang po, tuloy-tuloy pa lamang ang marking natin. [8:44] Kagaya nga po nang nabanggit kanina ni Chairman Luistro na hindi pa rin po ito matapos-tapos dahil dun po lamang sa confidential fund. [8:52] More or less, we are talking of 4,000 documents to be marked on the part of the prosecution. [8:59] So, on the part of the prosecution. [9:01] So, medyo mahaba po, maraming dokumento. [9:06] Kaya nga po, kami po ay humihingi ng karagdagang araw at saka kung papayagan din kami, additional team. [9:15] Sir, are you optimistic na papayagan po kayo? [9:19] Well, in the interest of fair play, para naman po maipresenta natin itong lahat dahil ito ay parte po ng mga dokumento na amin pong gagawing ebidensya. [9:30] So, tayo naman po naniniwala. [9:32] Napapayagan naman po tayo. [9:34] Sir, isa pa po. [9:36] May mga testigo po bang tumangging humarap o makipagtulungan? [9:41] O makipagtulungan pa hanggang sa ngayon? [9:43] Kung meron po. [9:44] Well, bawal po kaming sumagot dyan in the meantime. [9:47] Okay. [9:48] Sir, on the other, last one na po. [9:50] Mayroon po bang mosyon mula sa depensa na sa tingin nyo ay maaaring makakaapekto sa takbo ng kaso? [9:56] Thank you. [9:58] So far, wala naman po kaming mosyon na natatanggap. [10:00] Ngayon po kasi ang pinagkakaabalaan po parehas ng prosecution at depensa ay parehas po yung marking. [10:07] Sana po matapos na po ito. [10:12] Good afternoon po, Prosec Luizio and Prosec Shua. [10:15] Ma'am kahapon, dun sa manifestation na pinasa, nilahad na ng prosecution team yung concern na dapat ma-justify ng defense team kung bakit maraming magkakaparehong ebidensya and exhibits. [10:28] Pero apart from that problem, ma'am, is it right to say na it seems na yung gusto ng depensa na separate na pagmamarka ng ebidensya kahit pareho lang, isa po yun sa nagpapatagal ng pretrial ngayon? [10:39] Well, eh, masasabi po natin na pwede pong ganun, isa rin po yan sa magiging dahilan. [10:48] Pero, syempre, may mga iba naman po talaga na antayin na lang po natin siguro na yung depensa ay maglahad ng kanilang mga sarisay. [11:02] Kanina po, ma'am, we received a picture that the prosecution panel conferred with some of the defense team members. Ano po yung napag-usapan kung pwede pong malaman? [11:13] Wala namang po kaming alam. [11:46] Because the private prosecutors are acting under the direct control and supervision of the public prosecutors. [11:52] As a matter of fact, we make sure that there's always the presence of public prosecutor. [11:59] So that when I left around noontime, I made sure that Congressman Terry Redon is there to watch over the marking until the conclusion in the afternoon. [12:10] So yung nakita niyo pong picture, I am not actually conferring with the defense. [12:15] We are witnessing the actual marking of exhibits, which is attended by the prosecution, the defense, and the impeachment court represented by the Senate officials. [12:27] Thank you, ma'am. Last na lang po from my end, you mentioned po about the DEPs. [12:34] Yun po bang sinumitirin ng NBI during the Justice Committee proceedings? [12:39] Yung mga may pirma po, confidential fund receipts, and as well as the others from the PSA. [12:43] Kasama po ba yun sa volume na sa documents na minamarkahan ngayon? [12:46] Well, I can only confirm that the documents presented during the Justice Committee are included. [12:56] We cannot go deeper than that. [12:59] Thank you, ma'am. [13:02] Leon, is ka yung turn? [13:03] Palikan ko lang yung comment ni Joel kanina about the marking of common exhibits, no? [13:18] Usually, kapag common ang exhibits ng prosecution and defense, no? [13:24] Although subject to agreement din naman, possible na pwedeng ang marking ay same document. [13:32] But in this case, hindi siya nangyari because the position of the defense is to come up with their own marking on a separate set of documents. [13:44] So, yung process ng presentation ng documents for the purpose of marking, separate yun sa project, separate yun sa defense. [13:54] So, it makes it more time-consuming. [13:58] And if we're talking about around 4,000 documents, then it is as if you are marking 8,000 documents. [14:07] But of course, we understand that because it falls within their discretion to maintain that position, no? [14:15] I just want to share that in a court proceeding, it is possible. [14:19] Same document, it bears the marking of the prosecution and at the same time, the marking of the defense. [14:31] Good afternoon, ma'am. [14:32] Liales Kapadi, Jemini is online. [14:33] Ma'am, kasi I understand kasama rin po yung stipulations sa pre-trial conference. [14:40] Meron na po bang napag-agreehan ang prosecution and the defense? [14:45] Of course, aside from yung very general lang na the vice president is the sitting vice president, kasama rin kasi yun. [14:53] And she's from Davao, yung mga ganun. [14:54] Pero any salient agreements po, meron po ba kayong napagkasunduan with the defense? [15:02] In terms of stipulation of facts po. [15:05] Thank you. [15:07] Well, pasensya na po kayo dahil limited lang po ang pwede naming sabihin. [15:11] Basta lahat po ng mga agreements po namin ay sinumiti na po namin ito sa impeachment court. [15:20] Pero sir, for the record, meron po kayong napag-agreehan? [15:23] At least, with the defense? [15:25] Meron naman po. [15:26] Pero hanggang doon lang po pwede namin sabihin. [15:28] Saka sir, follow-up doon sa asking the defense to specify the purpose of presenting the witnesses. [15:38] Ang motion niyo po ba will be filed before the Senate impeachment court asking the Senate impeachment court to order the defense to specify the purpose? [15:51] Ganun po ba yung mangyayari? [15:52] Well, it is beyond our power already to resolve that motion. [15:58] It depends on the impeachment court on how they will appreciate the motion. [16:02] But our concern merely is to make the purpose for each witness more specific. [16:08] Ma'am, gaano po ba ka-importante na specific yung detalye sa pag-present ng isang witness for the public lang to understand na hindi pwedeng general lang na to dispute the allegations? [16:23] Thank you. [16:25] Of course, it has been shared already that a lot of witnesses of the prosecution were adopted by the defense, no? [16:33] So, we would like to be enlightened for what purpose are they or will they be presented by the defense so that we will understand the nature of the testimony to be presented by the witnesses. [16:52] It is possible that there is one witness, different purposes, and I think that will be best illustrated in this case. [17:01] As I have said, a lot of witnesses of the prosecution, particularly those which the people have seen in the hearing of the Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability and even in the hearing of the Committee on Justice, were included as well in the list of witnesses of the defense, no? [17:20] So, we assume that they will be presented for a different purpose other than the purpose of the prosecution, and that's why we want to be enlightened. [17:32] And besides, that is under the rule to provide a short summary of the nature of the testimony which will be provided by each witness. [17:45] Okay, Rosalie, your turn. [17:47] I will allow one more. [17:49] Sorry, related lang po doon. [17:53] Kailangan nyo rin po ba ng specifics kasi it's very important for your cross-examination, would that be correct? [17:58] It's important for the entire presentation of that particular witness. [18:06] Not only for cross, but even for direct, cross, redirect, and recross. [18:13] Thank you, Rosalie. [18:14] Your turn now. [18:16] Good afternoon po. [18:16] Rosalie Cospo of UNTV News. [18:18] Kongs, tatanong lang po namin, you're asking for four more days para po sa pre-trial conference. [18:24] Is that correct? [18:24] So, ang hinihingi po namin hanggang Sabado sana, four days. [18:33] So, kasi we understand na hanggang Wednesday lamang, hanggang Thursday lamang ang opisina ng Senado. [18:43] So, sana mapagbigyan kami na pati Biernes at saka Sabado ay maisama po nila. [18:52] Since last week po until yesterday, confident po kayo na on track na mauumpisahan yung impeachment trial on July 6. [19:03] Pero dahil po sa development na ito, are you still confident? [19:09] Yes, we remain confident at umaasa naman kami na kung wala naman po magiging abirya, tuloy-tuloy lamang po ang marking ng ebidensya. [19:19] But if the pre-trial conference will push until next week, will you still be on track? [19:28] For example, if the Senate impeachment court will not, hindi po nila pagbibigyan yung request nyo po na pati po Friday and Saturday ay extend ang pre-trial conference. [19:44] What is important is for the pre-trial order to be issued before July 6. [19:49] And it must be issued at the maximum 10 days after termination of pre-trial conference. [19:59] It can be less than 10 days after termination, but the maximum should be 10 days after termination of PTC. [20:07] Dapat meron ng pre-trial order. [20:10] So, nevertheless, we are not entertaining that possibility. [20:14] We are pushing for the termination of pre-trial conference this week, and that is why we have reached out to Secretary Bantug for two possible additional measures, yung nabanggit ni kong Joel Chua. [20:29] One is deploying additional teams for the marking of exhibits, perhaps from four going eight, and then providing additional days from including Friday and Saturday to be able to finish all the marking this week. [20:48] Pero kung nabanggit niyo po kahapon, kulang po ang defense team sa tao po nila compared po dun sa prosecution panel. [20:57] So, choice pa rin ba yun pagde-deploy ng additional teams kung kulang po yun pong inyong counterpart? [21:05] So, it will depend on the impeachment court. [21:07] I hope that they will be able to confer and convince the defense team to provide additional lawyers to attend to the marking of exhibits, considering the possible additional measures which will be adopted by the impeachment court. [21:26] Last, on my part na lang po. Ito pong hindi pagpayag ng defense team na markahan po yung pare-pareho niyo pong exhibits and witnesses. Do you think this is an attempt to delay po the process? [21:43] I do not want to speculate, no? Basta ang kaya ko lang i-share sa inyo, possible na one document, two markings. It's happening in the court, no? [21:53] But, of course, it is within the prerogative also of the defense if they want to have their own documents marked, separate from the documents of the prosecution, notwithstanding the fact that they are exactly the same. [22:11] Marion, our turn. [22:14] Kung, bakit po kaya? Ganun sa tingin ninyo yung kinagawa ng defense na gusto nila may separate marking pa when it's fact, parehong documents lang naman. [22:23] Nagbigay po sila ng dahilan. Nagbigay sila ng dahilan, bakit sila ng dahilan? [22:29] Well, that is their prerogative. Pero kagaya nga po ng binanggit ng ating chair na ayaw naman po namin mag-speculate kung ano po ang kanilang dahilan. [22:44] Chair, you mentioned earlier yung possibility po ng pag-open ng BIR box at the soonest possible time. [22:51] So, are we looking at parang pag-open pa lang po, pag-convene ulit ng impeachment court, eh matakal na sana po pati itong box? [23:01] It depends on the impeachment court because I believe that this is significant also to be considered for the purpose of supporting or determining the veracity of the allegation of the unexplained wealth. [23:20] Amassing unexplained wealth, non-disclosure in the SALN, and non-divestment of other transactions and undertaking, no? [23:28] As a matter of fact, we would have wanted it open during the proceeding of the Justice Committee, [23:35] except that we expressed also our apprehensions about the possibility of violating some provisions of law, [23:42] particularly the National Internal Revenue Code, which was cited by Commissioner Charlie Mendoza when he testified in the Justice Committee. [23:51] So, even if pang-dulo pa po yung ating unexplained wealth article na itatakal? [24:01] Yung sa amin, no? [24:04] Na-express, we wish to express our position about the BIR box, [24:09] if we will really decide to file the necessary manifestation on this, [24:16] we will be submitting to the impeachment court kung ano man magiging resolution nila on the matter. [24:25] Ma'am, si Attorney Poa, Attorney Michael Poa, in an interview, [24:31] sinabi po niya na for them, para po sa kanila, [24:34] yung importante po na sana, pag-convene po ng impeachment court, [24:37] eh mapag-usapan na magkaroon na po nung resolution sa two-thirds threshold. [24:44] Sabi po niya, that will be part of the ground rules. [24:46] Dapat daw alam na agad ng depensa kung ano ang magiging threshold [24:49] dahil wala pa namang categorical nga na sinasabi yung Senate right now. [24:53] Definitely, dapat mapag-usapan agad yan kaysa sa gitna mapag-usapan [24:56] and magkaroon ng problema, sabi ni Poa. [24:58] Do you share the same sentiment? [25:00] Well, we are agreeable to that, no? [25:03] At least in as far as I am concerned. [25:05] We're agreeable to that so that both parties will be guided [25:09] as we present our respective evidence. [25:13] And so that, when we conclude the presentation of evidence, [25:17] it is clear already, not only with the impeachment court and the parties, [25:21] but even to the sovereign Filipino people, [25:24] the proper interpretation and application of the threshold provided in the Constitution. [25:31] For the guidance of the viewing public, [25:34] ang nakalagay po sa saligang batas is two-thirds of all the members of the Senate. [25:39] because of the change of leadership when now SP was elected then as SP pro tempore, right? [25:50] Biglang na-enlightened po tayo dito sa doktrina ng Avellino versus Cuenco, no? [25:57] And that is why there are discussions now about the possibility of applying the same doctrine [26:03] with respect to the interpretation of the threshold required for the purpose of conviction. [26:10] So to your question, yes, I agree na mapag-usapan ito before the start of presentation of evidence. [26:18] Last na lang po, earlier sinabi na po ni Senator Panfil Laxon [26:27] ang napipisil ni Nakko sakali lang daw po na maging presiding officer ay si Senator Jesus Codero. [26:36] But yesterday po, sinabi ni Senator Robin Padilla na yung minority block po [26:42] should oppose yung possible designation po ni Jesus Codero bilang presiding officer for the impeachment trial. [26:47] Well, that is the prerogative of the impeachment court [26:52] dahil sa kanila meron naman po silang karapatan. [26:55] Yung karapatan po nila na magpromulgate ng kanilang rules. [27:00] And that is part of the rules. [27:02] And I understand that during the last session, they amended the rules. [27:11] And instead of the Senate President who will sit as a presiding officer, [27:17] it will be upon the election of the members of the Senate. [27:22] So, nasa kanila po lahat yung karapatan. [27:27] Alright. Right. We'll now recognize Gab. [27:33] Hello po. [27:34] Halos pare-pareho lang po yung tanong namin dun sa common evidence. [27:39] Tanong ko na lang po, [27:41] can you categorically state na this is the version of the pretrial conference [27:47] that is delaying? [27:49] Ito yung nagpapatagal sa step na ito sa proceedings? [27:59] Because of the voluminous documents that the prosecution needs to be marked, [28:05] my answer to you is yes. [28:08] In this particular case, [28:09] ang nagpapatagal ng PTC [28:11] is the marking of voluminous exhibits. [28:14] If you will remember, [28:16] the comment to propose a stipulation of facts, [28:21] counter-stipulations, [28:23] list of witnesses, [28:25] list of exhibits, [28:27] even the trial dates, [28:29] no? [28:29] Submitted na lahat yan sa impeachment court. [28:33] Ang natitira na lang [28:36] ay ang marking of exhibits. [28:39] And to the question, [28:42] ano nagpapatagal ng PTC, [28:44] yes, [28:45] it is the marking of exhibits [28:46] that is prolonging the pretrial conference. [28:49] Specifically, [28:50] the common evidence po. [28:53] Not only the common evidence, [28:55] but the totality of evidence that needs to be marked, no? [28:59] Remember that [29:00] a huge number of documentary exhibits [29:05] of the prosecution is listed as well [29:08] in the list of evidence of the defense, no? [29:11] So, [29:13] I presume that [29:16] kung gaano kadami [29:18] yung ebidensya ng prosecution, [29:21] most likely as to documentary exhibits. [29:24] Gano'n na rin karami yung sa defense. [29:29] Ma'am, [29:30] sir, may natagdag po kayo [29:32] kung Joel? [29:33] Or okay na po? [29:35] Kasi, [29:36] hindi naman yan. [29:36] Kasi normal na pagka-presentan mo yung ebidensya, [29:40] ay marka na lang na marka. [29:41] Hindi po ganyan yan. [29:43] So, normally po yan. [29:44] Pag may ebidensya na pinapresentan, [29:46] halimbawa may dokumento po, [29:48] ikukumpara pa yan, [29:49] titignan pa yan ng kabila [29:50] at magbibigay sila ng komento. [29:52] Pagkatapos po yan, [29:53] pipirmahan pa nung ano. [29:54] Pag nag-agree na po, [29:55] pipirmahan pa po yan [29:56] kung sino man yung, [29:59] yes, [30:00] may mga tao pa pong pipirma dyan. [30:02] So, [30:02] could you imagine, [30:03] kung apat na libon dokumento [30:05] sa amin pa lamang, [30:06] ladaan po sa lahat ng prosesong ganyan. [30:09] Kaya ganyan po talaga yung nangyayari. [30:13] Ma'am, [30:14] sir, [30:14] can you estimate [30:15] what, [30:16] up to what extent [30:17] bibilis sana yung proseso [30:19] kung sakaling pumayag yung defense panel [30:21] na yung common evidence e, [30:23] sabay nang i-verify? [30:27] Or sabay nang i-mark? [30:28] Well, [30:30] for the common evidence, [30:32] it will be half the time [30:33] which will be dedicated [30:35] to the common exhibits [30:38] for separate marking, no? [30:40] Kasi, [30:41] ang nangyayari doon, [30:43] separate yung presentation [30:44] and marking [30:45] for the prosecution, [30:49] papakita kay defense, [30:51] patatatakan sa impeachment court, [30:54] pipirmahan nung prosecution defense [30:57] at saka ng impeachment court. [30:58] So, yung prosesong yun, [31:00] uulitin mo ulit [31:01] pagdating doon sa defense. [31:03] Notwithstanding the fact [31:04] that you are talking about [31:06] exactly the same document, no? [31:08] So, na-double yung time. [31:11] So, if they will agree [31:12] na isang document lang, [31:14] ibig sabihin, [31:15] isang examination lang, no? [31:17] Isang termahan lang. [31:19] So, that will be, [31:21] as to the time [31:22] which will be spent, [31:23] it will be diminished [31:24] by half the time [31:25] which is actually being spent. [31:27] When marking [31:28] common exhibit [31:30] but separate documents. [31:33] Final question po. [31:36] Yung mga propose nyo po kasi na [31:38] paraan para magkaroon ng extra [31:41] na matapos yung [31:43] pre-trial conference [31:44] which is yung [31:44] additional lawyers po [31:46] or teams from the defense [31:48] or the [31:49] additional days [31:51] for the pre-trial [31:52] parang medyo [31:52] hanging on variables po siya eh. [31:55] Depende po siya [31:56] kung mag-agree [31:57] yung mga parties na iba. [31:58] Kung hindi po [32:00] mag-agree yung [32:01] sa dalawang [32:02] proposal na ito, [32:03] ano ba po yung [32:04] nakahandang [32:05] or meron pa po bang [32:06] naisip yung prosecution [32:07] na possible na paraan [32:09] para ma-expedite yung process? [32:16] Well, [32:17] as of now, [32:18] yun ang pinaka [32:18] solusyon [32:20] na nakikita po namin [32:21] unless of course [32:23] meron pang [32:24] may [32:25] sasuggest [32:26] ang defense [32:28] at saka ang [32:29] impeachment court. [32:31] So, [32:31] yun naman po ay aming [32:32] proposal [32:32] unless siyempre may [32:33] mas maganda silang [32:34] proposal. [32:37] Alright, [32:38] next question. [32:43] Maganda nga po po. [32:45] Ma'am, [32:46] does the prosecution [32:47] panel find [32:48] the marking [32:49] of the evidence [32:50] stage [32:51] taking longer [32:53] than usual [32:53] or taking longer [32:54] than what [32:56] the team expected? [33:01] Well, [33:01] we anticipated this [33:03] because [33:03] of course [33:05] we are aware [33:05] how voluminous [33:06] our documents [33:07] are. [33:08] It's just [33:10] when we realize [33:11] that the documents [33:14] of the defense [33:15] is similar, [33:17] that's when [33:17] we realize [33:18] that the time [33:20] to be consumed [33:20] for the marking [33:21] will be doubled [33:22] because almost [33:25] the same document [33:26] ang exhibits [33:26] ng prosecution [33:28] and defense [33:28] and then [33:30] they made a position [33:31] for the marking [33:33] on separate [33:33] set of documents. [33:36] And with [33:37] what is happening [33:38] at the PTC, [33:39] is there a risk [33:40] that the July 6 [33:41] start trial date [33:43] may be pushed back? [33:46] Well, [33:47] I don't think [33:47] and that is why [33:48] we are pushing [33:49] for additional [33:51] measures [33:52] on how to [33:53] expedite [33:53] the marking [33:54] of exhibits. [33:55] Sana pumayag [33:56] yung impeachment [33:57] court, [33:57] sana pumayag [33:58] din yung defense [33:59] because I think [34:00] we are aligned, [34:02] we have expressed [34:03] the common position [34:04] to start [34:05] the trial [34:06] on July 6. [34:07] So, [34:09] tingin ko naman [34:09] very much [34:10] feasible yun, [34:11] providing additional [34:12] teams [34:12] for the marking [34:14] of exhibits. [34:15] Right now [34:15] it's four, [34:16] sana maging eight, [34:18] so ito double [34:18] natin yung team. [34:20] At instead of [34:21] concluding [34:22] on first day, [34:24] kahit holiday [34:24] or kahit rest day, [34:26] like what [34:27] Kong Joel said, [34:28] we are requesting [34:29] to consider [34:30] Friday and Saturday [34:31] also [34:31] to continue [34:32] the marking [34:33] of exhibits [34:33] for both [34:34] the prosecution [34:34] and the defense. [34:36] And kung sakaling [34:37] hindi maresolve [34:38] itong concerns [34:40] over the scheduling [34:41] and the marking [34:43] of the evidence, [34:44] may risk po ba [34:45] to na madalili [34:46] yung start [34:47] na next week pa? [34:48] So, [34:49] I don't think [34:49] that it will [34:50] compromise [34:52] the start [34:53] of trial [34:53] on July 6. [34:55] As I have [34:56] shared earlier, [34:57] ang importante lang, [34:59] ma-issue yung [34:59] pre-trial order [35:01] before July 6 [35:03] because this [35:04] pre-trial order [35:05] will be the guide [35:06] for the parties [35:08] and the impeachment [35:09] court on how [35:10] to conduct [35:11] the trial. [35:12] So, [35:14] lahat ng nilalaman [35:15] ng pre-trial order, [35:17] ito yung magiging [35:18] Biblia [35:19] with respect [35:20] to the upcoming [35:21] trial, [35:22] not only for the [35:23] prosecution [35:23] and the defense [35:24] but also for the [35:26] impeachment court. [35:27] So, [35:28] so long [35:30] as ma-issue [35:31] ang pre-trial order [35:32] before July 6, [35:34] I am positive [35:35] that we will [35:36] be able [35:36] to push [35:38] through [35:38] with the [35:39] original schedule [35:40] for the start [35:41] of the trial. [35:42] And last [35:43] question po, [35:44] will a timely [35:45] start of the trial [35:46] help the [35:47] prosecution [35:48] present its [35:49] case po? [35:49] And if so, [35:50] how? [35:50] Well, [35:54] for me, [35:55] the only reason [35:56] why I'm really [35:57] pushing for [35:58] July 6 [35:58] is because [35:59] the people [36:00] have been [36:01] waiting for [36:02] this for so [36:03] long. [36:04] I've said [36:05] this before, [36:06] the grounds [36:07] in the first [36:08] impeachment [36:09] back in the [36:10] 19th Congress [36:11] and the grounds [36:12] for impeachment [36:13] during the [36:15] present [36:17] process [36:18] is almost [36:19] the same. [36:20] And since [36:21] then, [36:23] wala pa tayong [36:23] narinig [36:24] na maliwanag [36:26] na sagot [36:26] ng respondent [36:28] vice president. [36:29] So we are [36:30] hoping [36:31] that when we [36:32] start the [36:32] trial, [36:34] somehow, [36:35] the Filipino [36:35] people will [36:36] begin to hear [36:37] the genuine [36:38] defense [36:39] from the [36:41] respondent [36:41] vice president. [36:42] Okay, [36:45] now, [36:46] entertain [36:46] question [36:47] from [36:47] Jonathan [36:48] Yung. [36:50] Hello po, [36:51] Kongs. [36:52] Kasama po ba [36:53] si Mary Grace [36:53] Piatos sa mga [36:54] nanisto nyong [36:55] testigo na gusto [36:55] nyong ipatawag [36:56] na impeachment [36:56] court sa trial [36:57] against vice [36:58] president [36:58] Sara Duterte? [37:07] Hindi po yata [37:09] kami allowed [37:09] na sagutin yan. [37:17] Well, [37:17] I hope you [37:18] understand [37:18] because there [37:19] is certain [37:21] parameters [37:21] that were [37:22] laid by [37:23] the Senate [37:25] rules [37:26] that we [37:26] are not [37:27] allowed [37:27] to discuss [37:28] the merits [37:28] of the [37:29] case [37:29] kaya [37:30] pasensya [37:33] na po [37:33] kayo [37:33] kung bakit [37:34] medyo [37:34] limitado [37:35] lamang [37:35] ang aming [37:36] mga [37:37] pupwedeng [37:38] sagutin. [37:40] Pero makikita [37:41] po ba [37:41] yung [37:41] publiko [37:42] yung [37:42] pretrial [37:43] brief [37:43] ninyo? [37:47] Well, [37:47] I believe [37:48] that since [37:49] this is [37:49] a public [37:50] hearing, [37:51] I wish [37:53] to believe [37:53] that the [37:54] pretrial [37:54] order to [37:55] be issued [37:56] by the [37:56] impeachment [37:57] court [37:57] will be [37:58] shared [37:58] to the [37:59] public. [37:59] But [38:01] it's okay [38:02] to be [38:03] more [38:04] than us [38:06] than us. [38:08] Thank you. [38:10] Wait, [38:11] please. [38:11] Please, [38:12] yes or [38:13] no. [38:14] Do you [38:14] have [38:15] witnesses [38:16] that [38:16] will [38:17] corroborate [38:17] the testimony [38:18] of Ramil [38:19] Madriaga? [38:22] So, [38:24] sige. [38:25] Procec, [38:26] quick follow-up [38:27] lang po [38:27] dun sa [38:27] tanong. [38:28] Because [38:29] Lead [38:29] Procec [38:30] Luis Cho, [38:30] your [38:31] committee [38:31] proceedings [38:31] was [38:32] called [38:32] fishing [38:33] expedition [38:33] during [38:34] the [38:35] peak [38:35] that [38:35] it's [38:36] running. [38:36] But [38:36] the [38:37] same [38:37] exhibits [38:37] that [38:37] were [38:38] present [38:38] there [38:38] as [38:38] confirmed [38:39] by you [38:39] is also [38:40] being used [38:41] by the [38:42] defense [38:42] who [38:42] questioned [38:43] the [38:43] validity [38:44] and [38:44] credibility [38:44] of [38:45] those [38:45] exact [38:45] exhibits [38:46] and [38:46] they [38:46] want [38:46] it [38:46] marked [38:47] separately. [38:48] Prosecutor [38:48] Redon [38:49] said [38:49] the [38:50] same [38:50] observation. [38:51] Sabi [38:52] niya, [38:52] ito yung [38:52] very [38:52] exhibits [38:53] na [38:54] kinequestion [38:54] noon [38:54] ng [38:55] defense [38:55] BP [38:56] camp. [38:56] What's [38:57] your [38:57] comment [38:57] on [38:57] this [38:58] observation, [38:58] ma'am? [38:58] Well, [39:00] I share [39:02] the [39:02] position [39:03] of [39:03] Congredon [39:04] that somehow [39:06] there is [39:07] an operation [39:08] of [39:08] Estopel [39:09] which means [39:11] that [39:11] the fact [39:12] that you [39:12] are using [39:13] the same [39:14] documents [39:15] meaning [39:16] you are [39:17] waiving [39:17] your [39:17] questions [39:18] as to [39:18] their [39:19] admissibility. [39:21] Nonetheless, [39:22] I cannot [39:22] discuss [39:23] deeper. [39:24] In a [39:26] more [39:27] layman's [39:28] term [39:28] I guess [39:29] for the [39:30] public, [39:30] anong [39:31] insinuation? [39:34] Siguro [39:35] po pwede [39:35] natin [39:35] sabihin [39:36] na [39:37] dito [39:37] hindi [39:40] na nila [39:40] po pwedeng [39:41] questionin [39:41] yung [39:43] ebidensya [39:44] na aming [39:44] ipipresenta [39:45] dahil [39:46] ganun din [39:46] ebidensya [39:47] na kanilang [39:48] isusumiti. [39:50] So parang [39:50] inaamin na nila [39:51] na itong [39:52] ebidensya [39:52] nito [39:52] ay [39:53] mahalaga [39:55] para po [39:56] dito [39:56] sa [39:57] hearing. [39:59] So for [40:00] the record [40:00] po, [40:00] is this [40:01] a subtle [40:01] admission [40:02] that somehow [40:03] bago pa [40:04] magsimula yung [40:05] trial, [40:06] lahat na [40:06] exhibits na [40:06] galing sa [40:07] Justice [40:07] Committee [40:07] at nilatag [40:08] nyo doon [40:09] ay totoo, [40:09] credible, [40:10] to the extent [40:11] that they [40:11] also want [40:12] to use it? [40:17] Depende yan [40:18] kung paano [40:19] nila [40:19] gagamitin. [40:20] Baka [40:20] mamaya [40:20] gagamitin [40:21] nila [40:21] para [40:22] i-discredit [40:25] yung [40:25] ebidensya. [40:26] So [40:26] tignan [40:27] natin [40:27] kung paano [40:27] nila [40:28] gagamit [40:28] yung [40:28] ebidensya. [40:30] Alright, [40:31] I'll [40:31] give the [40:31] floor [40:31] to [40:32] Red [40:32] Mendoza. [40:34] Hi po, [40:35] Kong, [40:36] good afternoon. [40:37] Kung may [40:37] first question [40:38] kong, [40:39] kasi may [40:39] lumabas na [40:40] video si [40:41] attorney [40:41] Belzamora [40:42] about [40:42] yung [40:43] presentation [40:44] nyo [40:45] as [40:45] prosecutors [40:46] and [40:46] maraming [40:48] nag-comment [40:48] daw doon [40:49] sinasabi [40:49] nila [40:50] na [40:50] sandaw [40:51] nang [40:51] galing [40:52] sino [40:52] nag-fund [40:52] nung [40:52] video [40:53] na yun [40:53] and [40:54] maraming [40:56] daw [40:56] nag-comment [40:57] na [40:57] bakit [40:57] daw [40:57] kailangan [40:58] pa [40:58] ng [40:58] video [40:58] ng [40:59] prosecutors. [41:00] What's [41:01] your [41:01] take [41:01] po [41:02] doon [41:02] sa [41:02] criticism [41:03] na [41:03] ba't [41:03] kailangan [41:03] pa [41:04] ng [41:04] magpakita [41:06] ng [41:06] video [41:06] ang mga [41:07] prosecutors [41:08] doon [41:08] sa [41:09] or [41:09] mag-introduce [41:10] ang prosecutors [41:11] through a [41:11] video. [41:11] Sino [41:12] po nag-fund [41:12] nung video [41:13] na yun? [41:13] Alam mo [41:13] maganda [41:14] dito [41:14] kasi [41:14] sa [41:15] nangyayari [41:15] sa [41:15] atin [41:16] dito [41:16] sa [41:16] impeachment [41:17] marami [41:18] ang [41:18] mga [41:19] nagkukusa [41:20] na [41:21] mag-contribute [41:22] in whatever [41:23] way. [41:24] In fact [41:24] may mga [41:24] iba pa [41:25] nga po [41:25] na [41:26] nagtetect [41:27] sa amin [41:28] na baka [41:28] po pwede [41:29] maging [41:30] party [41:30] sila [41:30] ng [41:31] comms [41:34] at [41:34] sa sarili [41:35] nilang [41:36] effort [41:36] wala [41:37] kaming [41:37] gastos [41:38] ay [41:38] sila [41:40] rin. [41:41] So [41:41] ganun [41:41] din [41:41] dito [41:42] pati [41:42] sa [41:42] mga [41:42] legal [41:43] marami [41:44] pong [41:44] hanggang [41:45] ngayon [41:45] may mga [41:45] nagpipresenta [41:46] pa rin [41:46] po [41:47] na [41:47] maging [41:47] party [41:47] kaya [41:48] lamang [41:48] po [41:49] pinipili [41:49] lamang [41:50] po [41:50] namin [41:50] lahat [41:51] ang [41:51] mga [41:52] nagbo [41:52] volunteer [41:53] pero [41:55] kasi [41:55] marami [41:55] po [41:56] baka [41:56] gusto [41:56] ninyo [41:56] mag [41:56] volunteer [41:57] din [41:57] marami [41:58] po [41:58] kasi [41:58] nagkocomment [41:58] kasi [41:59] na [41:59] mas [42:00] tatawa [42:00] sila [42:00] na [42:00] bakit [42:01] kailangan [42:01] pang [42:02] i-present [42:03] i-present [42:03] nyo [42:04] po [42:04] yung [42:04] sarili [42:04] ninyo [42:04] sa [42:05] prosecution [42:05] while [42:06] present [42:13] house [42:13] prosecution [42:14] while [42:14] ang [42:14] defense [42:15] naman po [42:15] ay sobrang [42:16] tahimik [42:16] because [42:16] they're [42:17] following [42:17] the [42:17] process [42:18] or [42:19] they're [42:19] following [42:19] their [42:20] alam po [42:20] ninyo [42:20] hindi mo [42:21] na [42:21] mapipigilan [42:22] kung [42:22] ano [42:22] yung [42:22] mga [42:22] gustong [42:23] i-contribute [42:24] ng mga [42:24] tao [42:24] so [42:25] in [42:26] their [42:26] own [42:27] little [42:27] way [42:27] gusto [42:28] nila [42:28] na [42:28] makatulong [42:29] so [42:30] siguro [42:31] gusto [42:31] rin [42:31] nila [42:32] kasi [42:32] na [42:32] gawin [42:33] ito [42:33] para [42:33] ma-promote [42:34] din [42:34] itong [42:34] impeachment [42:35] magkaroon [42:35] ng [42:36] kaalaman [42:37] ang [42:43] at [42:43] nauunawaan [42:45] kung [42:45] ano [42:45] po [42:45] ito [42:46] kaya [42:46] may [42:46] mga [42:47] tao [42:48] na [42:48] gumagawa [42:49] ng [42:49] paraan [42:50] na [42:51] mga [42:51] interesado [42:52] na [42:53] sa [42:54] kanilang [42:55] tingin [42:56] ito [42:56] yung [42:56] pwede [42:57] nilang [42:57] i-contribute [42:58] para [42:58] sa [42:58] bayan [42:59] second [43:00] question [43:00] po [43:01] you [43:02] said [43:02] po [43:03] chair [43:04] na [43:04] you [43:04] proposed [43:05] 62 [43:05] days [43:06] for [43:06] the [43:06] trial [43:07] and [43:08] defense [43:08] po [43:08] 30 [43:09] days [43:09] I [43:10] just [43:10] like [43:10] to [43:11] ask [43:11] lang [43:11] po [43:11] why [43:12] 62 [43:13] days [43:13] kasi [43:13] there [43:14] are [43:14] some [43:15] comments [43:17] na [43:17] ito [43:18] yung [43:19] 62 [43:19] days [43:20] na [43:20] trial [43:20] date [43:21] ay [43:21] parang [43:22] pinapahaba [43:23] ninyo [43:24] just to [43:25] pull down [43:26] the [43:27] vice [43:27] president's [43:28] ratings [43:28] is it [43:29] true [43:29] or [43:30] bakit [43:31] po [43:32] ang [43:32] haba [43:32] ng [43:32] trial [43:33] 62 [43:33] days [43:33] in [43:34] defense [43:34] po [43:34] 30 [43:34] days [43:34] lang [43:35] po [43:35] nakita [43:36] naman [43:36] po [43:37] ninyo [43:37] paano [43:37] mo [43:37] iprepresentay [43:38] yung [43:38] 4000 [43:39] documents [43:39] sa [43:39] isang [43:40] confidential [43:40] pad [43:41] kung [43:41] 5 [43:41] araw [43:42] lang [43:42] 10 [43:42] araw [43:43] lang [43:43] di po [43:44] ba [43:44] so [43:44] depende [43:45] kasi [43:45] yan [43:45] sa [43:46] dami [43:46] ng [43:46] testigo [43:47] pero [43:47] ito [43:47] po [43:47] kasi [43:48] hindi [43:48] ibig [43:49] sabihin [43:49] porque [43:49] 62 [43:50] days [43:50] ang aming [43:51] pinropose [43:51] e [43:51] i-maximize [43:52] namin [43:53] yan [43:53] so [43:54] so [43:54] pwede [43:54] pwede [43:54] pwede [43:54] pwede [43:54] po [43:54] dumating [43:55] ang [43:55] pagkakataon [43:56] na [43:56] sa [43:56] tingin [43:57] po [43:57] namin [43:57] dalawang [43:58] articles [44:00] pa lang [44:00] ang aming [44:01] iprepresenta [44:02] pero [44:02] matibay [44:03] na matibay [44:03] na [44:03] ang [44:04] ebedensya [44:05] po [44:05] pwede [44:05] hindi [44:05] na [44:06] namin [44:06] ipresenta [44:06] yung [44:07] ibang [44:07] articles [44:07] so [44:08] pwede [44:08] matapos [44:09] na [44:09] doon [44:09] pa [44:10] lamang [44:10] so [44:10] kailangan [44:11] mo [44:11] siyempre [44:11] i-maximize [44:13] yung [44:13] pwede [44:14] mong [44:14] magawa [44:15] dahil [44:16] pag [44:16] ikaw [44:17] ay kinapos [44:17] mas [44:18] delikado [44:20] kasi [44:21] ito pong [44:22] number of [44:23] days [44:23] na iprepresenta [44:24] po namin [44:25] ay magiging [44:26] party po [44:27] ito [44:27] ng [44:27] pretrial [44:27] order [44:28] so [44:29] kagaya [44:30] po [44:30] na sinabi [44:31] sa ating [44:31] kanina [44:32] ni [44:32] chairwoman [44:33] Jinky [44:33] ang [44:34] pretrial [44:35] order [44:35] ay magiging [44:36] biblia [44:36] ito po [44:37] ay magiging [44:37] road map [44:38] ng [44:39] impeachment [44:40] hearing [44:41] so [44:42] lahat po [44:42] ng hindi [44:42] nasama [44:43] dito [44:43] ay hindi [44:44] na po [44:45] pwede [44:45] maipresenta [44:46] kasama [44:48] na po [44:48] doon [44:48] yung [44:49] araw [44:49] so [44:49] ibig [44:50] sabihin [44:50] kung [44:50] kinakailangan [44:51] pa namin [44:51] ng [44:51] additional [44:52] 10 [44:52] days [44:53] pero [44:53] 62 [44:53] days [44:54] lang [44:54] ang [44:54] sinabi [44:54] namin [44:55] wala [44:56] na [44:56] hindi [44:56] na po [44:57] pwede [44:57] hanggang [44:57] 62 [44:58] days [44:58] lang [44:58] yung [44:58] maximum [44:59] na [44:59] po [45:00] pwede [45:00] namin [45:00] i-consumo [45:01] last [45:03] na lang [45:03] po [45:03] and [45:03] may [45:04] ba [45:04] tayo [45:04] ng [45:04] topic [45:04] about [45:05] doon [45:05] sa [45:05] school [45:05] shooting [45:06] sa [45:06] Tacloban [45:07] there [45:07] are [45:07] calls [45:08] na [45:08] babaan [45:09] daw [45:10] ang [45:10] age [45:10] of [45:18] calls [45:18] to [45:19] decrease [45:19] the [45:20] criminal [45:20] liability [45:21] kasi [45:21] medyo [45:22] debatable [45:24] yung [45:25] topic [45:25] na yun [45:25] dahil [45:26] nga [45:27] sa [45:27] school [45:27] shooting [45:27] sa [45:28] Tacloban [45:28] alam [45:30] po [45:30] ninyo [45:30] maganda [45:32] yung [45:32] proposal [45:32] na yan [45:33] pero [45:33] siyempre [45:33] kailangan [45:34] alamin [45:35] din [45:35] natin [45:36] pakinggan [45:36] din [45:36] natin [45:37] yung [45:37] insights [45:39] ng [45:40] iba-ibang [45:40] mga [45:40] stakeholders [45:41] ng [45:42] iba-ibang [45:42] mga [45:42] halbawa [45:43] ng [45:43] DSWD [45:44] ng [45:45] mga [45:45] ibang [45:45] mga [45:46] eksperto [45:46] pagdating [45:47] po [45:47] dito [45:48] follow-up [45:52] lang po [45:52] Judea [45:52] Bernardo [45:53] of [45:53] DTV [45:54] News [45:54] meron [45:55] po [45:55] kasing [45:55] initial [45:56] na [45:56] sagot [45:57] si [45:57] attorney [45:57] michael [45:57] po [45:58] akahapon [45:58] within [45:58] media [45:59] regarding [46:00] po [46:00] dun [46:00] sa [46:00] adoption [46:01] of [46:01] common [46:02] evidence [46:03] witnesses [46:04] sabi [46:05] po [46:05] niya [46:05] let me [46:06] just [46:06] quote [46:06] they [46:06] are [46:06] entitled [46:07] to [46:07] their [46:07] own [46:08] opinion [46:08] yung [46:08] mirroring [46:09] yung [46:09] pag [46:09] adopt [46:10] hindi [46:11] daw [46:11] po [46:11] tamang [46:11] gamitin [46:12] yung [46:12] ganito [46:12] pong [46:12] salita [46:13] and [46:13] then [46:13] he [46:14] said [46:14] that [46:14] he [46:14] can [46:15] remember [46:15] sabay [46:15] daw [46:15] po [46:16] nagpasa [46:16] on [46:17] the [46:17] same [46:17] day [46:17] of [46:17] the [46:18] pretrial [46:18] brief [46:19] so [46:19] answer [46:20] po [46:20] ng [46:20] prosecution [46:20] may [46:21] I [46:22] hear [46:22] again [46:22] who [46:23] commented [46:23] that [46:24] si [46:24] attorney [46:24] michael [46:25] po [46:25] po [46:25] reason [46:27] why [46:27] we [46:27] use [46:27] the [46:28] term [46:28] adoption [46:29] is [46:29] because [46:30] the [46:31] witnesses [46:31] and [46:31] the [46:32] documents [46:32] have [46:33] been [46:34] presented [46:34] as [46:35] early [46:35] as [46:36] during [46:36] the [46:36] 19 [46:36] congress [46:37] dun [46:39] sa [46:39] inquiry [46:39] in [46:39] aid [46:40] of [46:40] legislation [46:41] ng [46:41] committee [46:42] on [46:42] good [46:42] government [46:42] and [46:43] public [46:43] accountability [46:44] then [46:44] presided [46:45] by [46:45] Congressman [46:45] Joel [46:46] Chua [46:46] even [46:47] the [46:48] other [46:48] evidence [46:49] have [46:49] been [46:49] presented [46:49] during [46:50] the [46:50] hearing [46:50] before [46:52] the [46:52] justice [46:53] committee [46:53] so [46:54] indeed [46:55] all [46:55] these [46:55] pieces [46:56] of [46:56] evidence [46:56] have [46:57] been [46:57] publicized [46:58] already [46:58] and [46:59] that [47:00] is [47:00] why [47:00] to [47:01] our [47:01] understanding [47:03] our [47:03] list [47:04] of [47:04] evidence [47:05] were [47:06] adopted [47:06] by [47:07] the [47:07] defense [47:08] nevertheless [47:09] we [47:09] acknowledge [47:10] that [47:10] fact [47:10] that [47:11] they [47:12] have [47:12] their [47:12] prerogative [47:13] and [47:13] judgment [47:14] to [47:15] choose [47:15] what [47:16] evidence [47:16] to [47:16] present [47:17] in [47:17] support [47:17] of [47:17] their [47:18] defense [47:18] how [47:19] will [47:20] this [47:25] affect [47:25] your [47:26] process [47:27] in [47:27] impeachment [47:28] what [47:28] do [47:28] you [47:28] mean [47:29] in [47:29] this [47:29] mga [47:29] good [47:29] form [47:30] you [47:30] have [47:31] manifested [47:38] that [47:39] to the [47:39] impeachment [47:39] court [47:40] and [47:41] we [47:41] submit [47:41] to [47:42] the [47:42] discretion [47:45] of the [47:45] court [47:45] as to [47:46] whether [47:46] they [47:46] will [47:47] order [47:47] the [47:47] defense [47:48] or [47:48] not [47:49] in [47:50] making [47:50] more [47:51] specific [47:51] the [47:52] purpose [47:52] for [47:53] the [47:53] presentation [47:53] of [47:54] these [47:54] witnesses [47:54] okay [47:56] Jonathan [47:57] you have [47:57] one [47:57] last [47:58] follow [47:58] up [47:58] do you [48:01] expect [48:02] to see [48:02] Mary [48:03] Grace [48:03] Piatos [48:03] impeachment [48:04] trial [48:04] let's [48:21] wait [48:22] and see [48:22] All right [48:24] that's [48:26] the last [48:27] question [48:27] I think [48:28] we will [48:29] really [48:29] have [48:29] to [48:29] wait [48:30] and [48:30] see [48:30] so [48:31] thank [48:31] you [48:31] to [48:32] our [48:32] prosecutors [48:34] leader [48:34] representative [48:35] Luis [48:36] and [48:37] prosecutor [48:37] Joel [48:38] Chua [48:38] and [48:39] salamat [48:39] din [48:40] sa [48:40] ating [48:40] mga [48:40] kapatid [48:41] sa [48:41] media [48:41] dahil [48:42] kayon [48:43] tumutulong [48:43] para [48:43] sa [48:43] ating [48:44] mga [48:44] mamamaya [48:44] na [48:45] maintindihan [48:45] ang [48:46] napakahalagang [48:46] prosesong [48:47] ito [48:47] maraming [48:48] salamat [48:48] po [48:49] and [48:49] good [48:49] afternoon