About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Karoline Leavitt clashes with reporter over war crime claim from FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul, published March 31, 2026. The transcript contains 1,311 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Sure. Hi, Lindsay Ellis from the Wall Street Journal. I'm trying to square the four objectives laid out by the administration with the goal of reopening fully the Strait of Hormuz. Would President Trump declare victory and wind down military operations if the four objectives are met but still..."
[0:00] Sure. Hi, Lindsay Ellis from the Wall Street Journal. I'm trying to square the four objectives
[0:04] laid out by the administration with the goal of reopening fully the Strait of Hormuz.
[0:10] Would President Trump declare victory and wind down military operations if the four objectives
[0:14] are met but still passage remains quite slow through the Strait? Look, as I've said repeatedly
[0:20] and as the President has laid out, the objectives of Operation Epic Fury are as follows. Destroying
[0:24] the Iranian Navy, destroying their ballistic missiles, dismantling their defense industrial
[0:29] infrastructure that produces those weapons that have long threatened the United States and our
[0:34] allies, and then, of course, preventing Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon. The full
[0:39] reopening of the Strait is something the administration is working towards, but the
[0:43] core objectives of the operation have been clearly defined for the American people by the Commander
[0:47] in Chief. The President posted this morning about, you know, his threat that on leaving Iran, he said
[0:54] we might be blowing up and completely obliterating all of their electric generating plants, oil wells,
[0:59] hard island, and possibly all desalinization plants. Under international law, striking civilian
[1:05] infrastructure like that is generally prohibited. Why is the President threatening what would
[1:10] amount to potentially a war crime with the U.S. military? And how do you square that with the
[1:14] administration repeatedly saying that the U.S. does not target civilians? Look, the President
[1:18] has made it quite clear to the Iranian regime at this moment in time, as evidenced by the statement
[1:23] that you just read, that their best move is to make a deal or else the United States Armed Forces
[1:29] has capabilities beyond their wildest imagination. And the President is not afraid to use them.
[1:35] That's not what I said, Garrett. And you're saying the word potential for a reason, because I'm sure
[1:40] some experts are telling you that in your ear to try to ask me that question. Of course, this
[1:46] administration and the United States Armed Forces will always act within the confines of the law.
[1:51] But with respect to achieving the full objectives of Operation Epic Fury, President Trump is going
[1:56] to move forward unabated, and he expects the Iranian
[1:59] regime to make a deal with the administration.
[2:01] The Press Right on. Which of those objectives would destroying a desalination plant most help?
[2:07] Ms. Haley, go ahead.
[2:08] The Press Thanks, Caroline. I want to follow up on Iran. When you're describing that the Iranians
[2:13] you're in contact with are being more reasonable this time around in discussions, what specifically
[2:18] are you hearing that is leading you to that conclusion? And how are you defining what's
[2:22] reasonable versus unreasonable in that regard?
[2:24] Ms. I'm not going to detail the private, insensitive conversations that are taking
[2:28] place between the United States and Iran.
[2:29] The Press But generally speaking?
[2:31] Ms. Generally speaking, the President gave you the answer. What we're hearing from them
[2:35] is more reasonable. They have agreed to some of the points the United States laid out,
[2:39] as the President said last night aboard Air Force One. But again, as for the specifics,
[2:43] as these negotiations are ongoing, we're not going to broadcast them to the world unless
[2:47] the President chooses to do so, which he has the full right to do as the leader of the
[2:50] free world.
[2:51] The Press On Cuba, the President threatened to tear any country that would send oil to
[2:57] Cuba.
[2:59] He said he would not allow any Russian tanker to Cuba. Is this a policy change, or is he
[3:04] willing to let more tankers into Cuba now?
[3:06] Ms. This is not a policy change. There has not been a formal change in sanction
[3:11] policy. As the President said last night, we allowed this ship to reach Cuba in order
[3:16] to provide humanitarian needs to the Cuban people. These decisions are being made on
[3:21] a case-by-case basis.
[3:23] As the administration has said, Cuba's non-functional economy cannot be fixed unless they undergo
[3:28] dramatic political and leadership changes.
[3:29] But there has been no formal change with respect to sanction policy.
[3:33] The Press So you could expect more tankers to go to Cuba?
[3:37] Ms. Again, these decisions are being made on a case-by-case basis right now.
[3:40] The Press Thanks, Carolina. You addressed this a little bit in the opening, but just
[3:43] to follow up, because Americans are sort of seeing these conflicting messages between
[3:46] the United States and Iran. I know the President insists that negotiations are underway. As
[3:51] you just mentioned, he's also said that Iran has agreed to most of the 15 points. We just
[3:56] heard from Iran again. They're saying no negotiations are taking place. They're calling on the United
[3:59] States. They're calling the proposal excessive, unrealistic.
[4:03] So how do you square that? How do you explain that discrepancy between the two?
[4:06] Ms. I think the American people are smart enough not to take the word of a terrorist
[4:11] regime that has chanted death to America for 47 years at their word. And I hope the journalists
[4:17] in this room are wise enough not to take an Iranian regime that has repeatedly lied about
[4:22] our country, about our values, about everyone in this room, frankly, for nearly five decades.
[4:29] I think the American public are smart enough to understand that.
[4:31] The Press Just to follow up on the objectives, you've laid them out, but I know the President
[4:34] has set a deadline for April 6th in just one week. What does the President need to see
[4:40] to not move forward with those strikes by April 6th?
[4:42] Ms. Well, I think he said it in his true social post this morning. He wants to see
[4:46] a deal over the next 10 days. That timeline is waning. Several days left. And we'll see.
[4:52] I won't get ahead of it. We'll see what happens in the end of the 10-day period.
[4:55] The Press Thank you, Carolina. Thank you. One on Iran, one on the shutdown.
[4:59] The President continues to say the U.S. is in conversations with a more reasonable regime,
[5:05] but there are now hundreds of U.S. special operations forces, including Navy SEALs and
[5:09] Army Rangers in the Middle East, as well as thousands of other troops already deployed.
[5:13] So is he trying to end or intensify the conflict?
[5:17] Ms. The President is focused on achieving the objectives of Operation Epic Fury. With
[5:23] respect to forces that are on the ground in the Middle East, it's the job of the Pentagon
[5:28] to create maximum optionality for the commanding authorities.
[5:29] The Press Thank you.
[5:30] Ms. The President continues to say the U.S. is in conversations with a more reasonable
[5:36] regime, but there are now hundreds of U.S. special operations forces in the Middle East,
[5:40] as well as thousands of other troops already deployed.
[5:43] The Press Thank you.
[5:44] Ms. I'd like to know what's going on in the Middle East.
[5:50] The Press Thank you.
[5:52] Thank you.
[5:53] The Press Thank you.
[5:54] The Press Thank you.
[5:55] The Press Thank you.
[5:56] The Press Thank you.
[5:57] The Press Thank you.
[5:58] I think, too, you have to keep track of what's on the ground.
[5:59] Ms. Thank you.
[6:00] faith to engage in diplomacy with the Iranian regime prior to this operation being launched
[6:06] in the first place.
[6:07] He wanted to strike a deal, and he sent his top negotiators to do so.
[6:11] They spent an extensive amount of time and effort trying to strike a deal, and unfortunately,
[6:17] the previous regime, again, many of those leaders no longer with us here on Earth because
[6:21] they faced the consequences of the United States military.
[6:24] So if there's ever a chance for a deal, again, the President is open to listening, but it
[6:29] does not deter him from focusing on the military objectives that he set out 30 days ago and
[6:34] that our military is continuing to achieve day by day.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →