About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of JUST IN: Gooden Asks SPLC President Point Blank: Did Your Org Ever Designate Antifa As A Hate Group? from Forbes Breaking News, published June 10, 2026. The transcript contains 937 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"I yield back. Gentleman yields back. The gentleman is inspired. The chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas, Mr. Gooden. Mr. Fair, during the Biden-Harris administration, the SPLC included many mainstream conservative groups in their hate map, including Alliance Defending Freedom, Charlie Kirk's..."
[0:00] I yield back.
[0:00] Gentleman yields back.
[0:01] The gentleman is inspired.
[0:02] The chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas, Mr. Gooden.
[0:05] Mr. Fair, during the Biden-Harris administration, the SPLC included many mainstream conservative
[0:10] groups in their hate map, including Alliance Defending Freedom, Charlie Kirk's Turning Point
[0:15] USA, and Family Research Council.
[0:17] To your knowledge, did the SPLC include Antifa, which is an actual domestic terrorist organization
[0:23] in its hate group?
[0:25] Congressman Gooden, just for the record, the SPLC does not have a domestic terrorist
[0:33] list.
[0:33] I'm not sure what Dr. King was referring to, what list she's referring to.
[0:38] As I understand, she's on none of our list.
[0:41] We have a list that identifies groups based on the statements that they and their leaders
[0:47] make.
[0:48] Is Antifa on your hate map?
[0:50] Again, as I said earlier, Congressman Gooden, it's my understanding that the FBI has said-
[0:56] So they're not.
[0:57] Let me ask you this.
[0:58] Has SPLC labeled the radical left group Jane's Revenge as a hate group?
[1:03] This group has publicly taken responsibility for vandalizing and destroying pregnancy resource
[1:08] centers and Catholic churches since May 2022.
[1:12] Have you all designated that on your hate map?
[1:15] Congressman Gooden, if you've looked at our hate map, you know the criteria we set for
[1:21] designating groups.
[1:22] One designation is when a group expresses, vilifies, demonizes individuals based on immutable characteristics.
[1:33] The second is a group that expresses anti-government conspiracy theories.
[1:39] So destroying pregnancy resource centers and Catholic churches would not qualify as hate under your
[1:48] definition.
[1:49] You guys are okay with that.
[1:51] But God forbid, turning point holds a rally.
[1:53] That's considered hate.
[1:54] But destroying a Catholic church or a pregnancy resource is not.
[1:58] Just to be clear, help me understand.
[1:59] Congressman Gooden, the SPLC establishes its own criteria and any other group can create
[2:10] its own list.
[2:12] Under our criteria, we've designated those groups based on what they've said.
[2:17] Under your criteria, Turning Point USA Family Research Council and other conservative Christian
[2:22] groups are considered hate groups, but Antifa and Jane's Revenge that burns down Catholic
[2:28] churches and pregnancy resource centers, those are not hate groups.
[2:31] It sounds like you're really proud of that process.
[2:34] I'll move on because I frankly think it's disgusting.
[2:37] And you know what?
[2:38] I'd actually ask for you to add me to your hate map.
[2:40] I'd be honored to be on it.
[2:41] It sounds like I'd be in great company.
[2:43] During the Biden-Harris administration, the FBI's Richmond field office relied on information
[2:48] from the SPLC when creating its memorandum that categorized certain Catholics as racially
[2:54] motivated, violent extremists.
[2:57] Do you believe that Americans practicing their Christian faith and exercising their First
[3:01] Amendment rights are violent extremists?
[3:03] Congressman Gooden, the SPLC doesn't identify any group based on religion.
[3:10] We too believe in religious liberty.
[3:12] We identify groups based on the statements they make, that their leaders make, based on their
[3:17] activities that target various group based groups.
[3:21] Well, many of these statements are based on religious beliefs.
[3:24] So I take issue with that.
[3:26] Let me ask you, were your donors informed of your partnership with federal agencies under
[3:31] Biden-Harris administration?
[3:33] Did you let them know that, that you all are working with them?
[3:37] Congressman Gooden, the SPLC has worked with every administration since our founding to
[3:44] advance racial justice and equality in this country.
[3:47] We believe our donors and supporters support all of the work that we do.
[3:57] So funding radical racist groups is something that your donors are on board with.
[4:02] I have a hard time believing that.
[4:04] Mr. Jordan, I'll yield the balance to you.
[4:07] I thank the gentleman for yielding.
[4:11] Mr. Fair, if you're trying to stop hate, why would you encourage people to attend a hate rally?
[4:21] The SPLC doesn't encourage people to attend hate rallies, Chairman Jordan.
[4:27] And if you're referring to any allegations in the indictment.
[4:31] Well, I just, I'm not just asking in general.
[4:33] I'm not saying with, it's one thing you've said you've had informants, you had field sources.
[4:37] If you have informants and field sources there, that's one thing.
[4:40] But the indictment says that these informants and field sources were encouraging other people
[4:43] to attend these hate rallies.
[4:45] And I'm saying, okay, so you don't have to answer that specifically.
[4:48] But is that a good thing in general?
[4:49] Again, all the allegations and the indictment, Chairman Jordan, will be addressed.
[4:57] Do you wish you hadn't done the program?
[5:00] You said the program was successful, helpful, but now you're stopping it.
[5:07] We stopped the program because we believe hate and extremism has migrated significantly online
[5:17] and into government agencies.
[5:20] Wow, wow, that's, that's, that's, that's big.
[5:24] That makes no sense.
[5:26] The chair now recognizes.
[5:29] Mr. Chairman, I've got a UC request, if that's all right.
[5:31] Gentleman, consider the UC request.
[5:33] Okay.
[5:33] First, I ask unanimous consent to introduce this article about whether, in fact, people have been driven
[5:40] from the public square.
[5:41] 2025 was a banner year for Alliance Defending Freedom in their newsletter.
[5:48] And I ask unanimous consent to introduce for the record a report by the DOJ's Office of the Inspector General,
[5:53] which found no evidence of anti-Catholic bias or malicious intent on the part of the FBI personnel
[5:59] who prepared the Richmond domain perspective.
[6:02] Even though they apologize for it.
[6:04] Well, I've got the report right here from the Inspector General.
[6:07] Well, we have the apology from, from Director Wray.
[6:09] So we, you typically don't apologize for something if you didn't do anything wrong.
[6:12] Let's submit it to the record and let everybody read both of them.
[6:15] Yeah, okay.
[6:16] We'll have to submit to Director Wray's.