Try Free

'I Hope You Won't Do Something Like That Again...': John Kennedy Bluntly Speaks To Trump Judge Nom

Forbes Breaking News June 12, 2026 6m 746 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of 'I Hope You Won't Do Something Like That Again...': John Kennedy Bluntly Speaks To Trump Judge Nom from Forbes Breaking News, published June 12, 2026. The transcript contains 746 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"I want to comment. I think you've just seen some political theater that's been demonstrated here with a lot of people that are up for nominations for the judiciary. I think I'd like to quote Justice Jackson on another point when she was asked about January 6th during her nomination, quote, it would"

[0:00] I want to comment. I think you've just seen some political theater that's been demonstrated here [0:09] with a lot of people that are up for nominations for the judiciary. I think I'd like to quote [0:17] Justice Jackson on another point when she was asked about January 6th during her nomination, [0:23] quote, it would be inappropriate to me to publicly weigh into any subject of political debate and [0:33] to quote Senator Kennedy. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Congratulations, Judge. I think we ought to clear [0:47] the air here. We all know what's going on. President Trump believes passionately that he won the 2020 [0:58] election. And you're being asked these questions in hopes you will say that he didn't or in hopes [1:17] that you will say that he did, regardless of what you actually think. The further hope is that it will [1:26] cause the president to twist off and pull your nomination. And that's what's going on here. [1:33] I'm not saying my good friend doesn't have the right to do that. Some would say it's kind of clever, [1:43] but I don't think we ought to kid ourselves about what's going on. Number two, my job, I don't, [1:59] this business of confirming judges has become too much of a shirts versus skins game for my taste. If I [2:09] could change it, I would, but I can't. Picking somebody for the federal benches is as serious [2:17] as four heart attacks and a stroke. You're there for life. We better get it right. And my job is to [2:27] be, as I see it, is to be an equal opportunity antagonist. Now, some would use another A word to [2:38] describe me. And I've realized that. That's my job. And the two biggest things going for you, [2:49] judge, I don't know. You have Richard Berry, it's impressive, or John Hoven and Kevin Kramer. [2:58] If they tell me you ought to be on the court of appeal, I believe them, because they understand [3:08] the role of a United States senator. There are a couple of questions I want to ask you. [3:14] Why did you, I understand, I heard your answer to Senator Durbin, but you were a sitting federal [3:24] judge, and I know some other judges joined you, but you wrote a letter to Columbia saying, [3:32] because of what I see happening at Columbia, I'll never hire one of your graduates. Why did you do that? [3:43] Senator, I was asked to sign the letter. It was indicated over a period of time. And the reason why [3:50] is because it wasn't simply a student protest that was occurring. It was a protest that was [3:59] resulting in violent conduct. Well, I know what happened. I guess what I'm getting at is our federal [4:10] judiciary has lost some of its legitimacy. I'm not laying it at your doorstep, but it has. And so many [4:20] Americans now feel, because they're told, that judges are just politicians in robes. They're just [4:30] meaning legislatures. And that's not what our founders intended. And I don't think that's what [4:36] they are. And so when a federal judge expresses a political opinion like you did, and your colleagues [4:47] did, how does that help our effort to help the public understand that judges aren't politicians? [5:00] Senator, I've been told a lot that federal judges have a lot of power. And you've said it, [5:04] I think, in other contexts. But our power is limited. It's significantly limited to the case [5:11] or controversy before us. We don't have the power of an executive. We don't even have the power to [5:16] change laws like you do as a legislator. I get that, Judge. And you're a judge. You can do what [5:21] you want. I hope you won't do something like that again. I'm not saying you don't have the right. [5:31] But when you adopt a political position, which I happen to believe, frankly, to do that as a [5:39] private lawyer is one thing. To do it as a sitting federal judge is quite another. And I just don't [5:48] think it's a good thing. That's my personal opinion. You don't tweet anymore, do you? [5:55] I do not. [5:56] Okay. You don't go on social media at all? [5:58] I go on social media to follow other people, including... [6:02] But not to post. [6:03] Not at all. In fact, I think I know the name of your elliptical. [6:08] Yeah. Margaret and I had a date Sunday night. [6:13] In the carport. [6:14] In my carport. She won. Thank you. I'm over. I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →