Try Free

Cross-examination of Mr. Chad Parian as Defense’s witness on the impeachment trial day 43

UNTV News and Rescue November 12, 2026 19m 2,540 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Cross-examination of Mr. Chad Parian as Defense’s witness on the impeachment trial day 43 from UNTV News and Rescue, published November 12, 2026. The transcript contains 2,540 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Attorney Ray, any cross? A few questions, Your Honor. You may proceed, Sir. Mr. Parian, Chad. Yes, po. Good morning, po. Tanong ko lang po, kailan po kayo unang nagkakilala ni Attorney Carpio? Same year lang din po ng tournament. Around siguro po. 2025? Tama po. 2025, around siguro po, March, I..."

[0:00] Attorney Ray, any cross? [0:02] A few questions, Your Honor. [0:03] You may proceed, Sir. [0:05] Mr. Parian, Chad. [0:08] Yes, po. Good morning, po. [0:10] Tanong ko lang po, kailan po kayo unang nagkakilala ni Attorney Carpio? [0:16] Same year lang din po ng tournament. [0:18] Around siguro po. [0:19] 2025? [0:21] Tama po. [0:21] 2025, around siguro po, March, I think po. [0:25] At pagkatapos ng tournament na yun, magkakilala kayo, [0:29] sabi mo kanina, nabanggit mo na naging magkaibigan na rin kayo. [0:35] Tama po ba? [0:36] Yan yung touring mo na sa kanya? [0:38] Doon po sa, to say it, doon po sa Malaysia, [0:42] hindi pa po, I treat him as a cooperative. [0:44] No, ang tinatanong ko yung ngayon. [0:46] Ngayon po, medyo po, kasi nagsama na po na matagal yung mga bata. [0:50] Oo, at saka ilang beses na kayo yung nasama sa tournament, di po ba? [0:54] Opo, I could say that. [0:54] Na kasama yung mga anak nyo. [0:56] Correct po. [0:57] Siguro mga anim or pitong beses, tama po ba? [0:59] At marami doon sa abroad yung tournament, tama po ba? [1:08] Yes po. [1:08] Ilang beses kayo nag-abroad, nakasama yung team? [1:14] Can I see the number or the... [1:15] Apat o limang beses, tama po? [1:17] Ako po kasama four or five times po. [1:23] Tama. [1:24] Yung pong sa Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, [1:27] Yes po. [1:27] Noong June 12, 2015, [1:29] Yes po. [1:30] Sa Ansa City, Korea, July 2025, one month after. [1:39] Pagkatapos sa Singapore, October 22 or thereabouts, 2025. [1:46] Yes, attorney. [1:49] Nagbiyahe din po kayo sa Fukuoka, Japan, February 20, 2026. [1:56] Yes po. [1:57] Tapos, naglaro din kayo locally, tama po ba? [2:01] Yes po. [2:02] Sa Cebu. [2:03] Tama po. [2:03] Tama. [2:05] July 5, 2026. [2:07] Tama po. [2:09] At dito rin locally sa South Mall. [2:12] Yes. [2:13] August 2026. [2:14] Yes po. [2:15] Kasama po, sumama po ba kayo noong September sa Shanghai, China? [2:21] Hindi po. [2:22] Hindi kayo kasama doon? [2:23] Dahil madalas kayo magkita at madalas kayo magkasama, [2:27] eh, sabi mo nga, [2:29] naging magkaibigan na rin kayo ni attorney Carpio. [2:32] I could say that po. [2:34] So you are not exactly a disinterested third party in this case. [2:39] Objection, Your Honor. [2:40] I'm asking the witness, Your Honor. [2:42] Objection, Your Honor. [2:43] It's a technical term. [2:45] How could the witness answer that? [2:47] If he knows, if that's your objection, [2:49] if he knows, kung alam niyo po yung sagot sa tanong at naunawaan niyo ginong, Chad, [2:52] kung hindi po, sa mga... [2:53] Can you repeat the question, sir? [2:54] Kailangan niyo po si attorney Carpio? [2:56] I could say so, sir. [2:57] At kung makaari, kung pwede niyo siyang tulungan sa anumang paraan, [3:00] tutulungan niyo siya, hindi po ba? [3:03] Hindi naman po. [3:03] I'm here to testify po doon sa Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [3:07] Ah, sige po. [3:08] Anyway, I'll take that. [3:09] I'll proceed to other points. [3:16] Sino po ang kumausap sa inyo na kayo ang magtestigo dito sa bagay na ito? [3:24] Well, na... [3:27] Actually po, hindi ko po alam na masasabina ako. [3:29] Mayroon, nagkaroon lang po kami ng usap-usapan sa grupo. [3:33] And I, tungkol doon sa purchases sa Nike. [3:37] Nag-volunteer po ba kayo? [3:38] Hindi, nag... [3:40] Ang usap-usapan po is kung pwedeng tumulong or mag-testify. [3:44] That's exactly what I was asking you earlier. [3:46] Yes. [3:46] So you are willing to help, Atty. Carpio? [3:51] Not help po, just to testify on the purchase po. [3:55] Darag yan, darag. [3:55] Kaya nga, kaya ka nag-testify kasi gusto mong tumulong, [4:01] na ipaliwanag yung gusto mong ipaliwanag. [4:03] Tama po ba? [4:04] The event only po. [4:05] Okay. [4:05] Now, sabi niyo, sinugpina kayo? [4:10] Yes. [4:10] Wala po bang kumausap sa inyo sa parte ng defensa? [4:15] Since kaibigan kayo ni Atty. Carpio? [4:17] Nang respondents? [4:19] Wala naman po. [4:21] Wala po? [4:21] Sigurado po kayo? [4:22] You're under oath, sir? [4:25] Yes po. [4:25] Ngayon, ano po ang kabuhay niyo, sir? Anong trabaho niyo ngayon? [4:35] Ngayon po, may negosyo po ako. Negosyo po. [4:39] Ano po yung pangalan ng negosyo niyo? [4:41] I own MCDOS Plug and Play Internet Cafe. [4:47] Ano po ang pangalan ng negosyo niyo? [4:49] Yan po. [4:50] Ano po ang registered name ng negosyo niyo? [4:54] MCDOS Plug and Play Internet Cafe. [4:56] So, MACDOS Plug and Play Internet Cafe. [5:00] Yes po. [5:00] Nagulat lang kasi ko kahapon pinag-uusapan dito Jollibee eh. [5:05] Yung negosyo niyo. [5:05] Hindi lang po. [5:06] MACDOS Internet Cafe. [5:08] It stands for my pangalan po ng mga anak po. [5:12] So, MCDOS Internet Cafe. [5:15] Yun lang po ba ang negosyo niyo? [5:17] May family business po kami. I shared family business. [5:20] Opo. [5:20] Si misis po, anong kabuhayan? [5:23] Well, katulong ko po sa negosyo. [5:25] At sabi niyo kanina magkakaiba ang skwela ng mga anak niyo ni Atty. Carpio. [5:32] Yes po. [5:33] Anong skwela po pumapasok yung mga anak niyo? [5:37] Your Honor. [5:39] Your Honor. [5:40] Show the relevance. [5:41] Your Honor. [5:42] Your Honor, apologies. [5:44] May I call the attention of the presiding officer with all your respect. [5:47] Your Honor, the question, the witness is being asked about the school where his child is studying, Your Honor. [5:54] I think to protect the privacy of the minors who are not involved in this impeachment case, we will have to object for reasons of security, Your Honor. [6:02] Your Honor, there is no privacy issue about school. [6:06] These are minors, Your Honor. [6:08] It's the witness who mentioned... [6:10] Suffice it to say, Attorney Ray, that I am familiar with this arrangement and team actually. [6:17] The children come from different schools. [6:20] Yes, sure. [6:21] They are recruited through their respective coaches and come from different schools. [6:27] Yes, we will submit, Your Honor. [6:27] I think that information should be sufficient. [6:29] We will move to another point, Your Honor. [6:30] Move on, Attorney Ray. [6:31] Thank you. [6:32] Thank you, Your Honor. [6:32] It's okay. Again, councils, we have settled the better. [6:43] The fact is, your children are going to exclusive schools. [6:48] Tama po ba? [6:49] Objection, Your Honor. May we ask the relevance of this, Your Honor. [6:52] Again, it still pertains to the children. [6:55] This can still specify where the children are studying regardless without naming the schools. [7:01] It is not only irrelevant, it is subjecting security concerns to the children, Your Honor, which is not part of this impeachment decision. [7:08] Attorney Ray, kindly move on. [7:10] Dahil po kayo ay may mga sariling negosyo, hindi naman po kayo... [7:13] Basasabi po natin na kahit pa paano may kaya kayo sa buhay. Tama po ba? [7:17] Awaw po ng boss siya. [7:19] Nung Diyos, okay naman po. [7:21] Okay. Ngayon, punta tayo dun sa pinag-uusapan natin yung pagtistigo nyo kanina. [7:28] Ang sabi po nyo, naroon kayo nung i-charge ni... [7:41] Teka mo na, balikan ko muna. [7:44] Naintindihan nyo po ba kung bakit natin pinag-uusapan ng bagay na ito dito sa impeachment court? [7:51] Medyo po, hindi naman po ako lawyer. [7:53] Pero may... [7:54] Yes. [7:54] Pakakain din po. [7:55] Oo. So dahil nga, nagkataon na yung asawa ni Attorney Manz Carpio eh ang ating Vice President. [8:02] Yes pa. [8:02] So isa sa po siyang official publiko at may mga batas tayo na tungkol sa kung paano dapat mamuhay yung mga public servants natin. [8:15] Tama po ba? Alam nyo po ba yun? [8:18] In a way po. [8:19] Alam nyo po ba na sa ating saligang batas mismo, nakalagay dun, Section 1 ng Article 11 ng Constitution na public officers and public employees are supposed to lead modest lives? [8:32] Objection, Your Honor. [8:34] Calls for a legal conclusion. [8:36] The witness is incompetent. [8:38] I'm just asking the witness if he's familiar. [8:40] The connection, allow me to finish, Attorney. [8:42] Can we allow Attorney Justin to finish, Attorney Ray? [8:44] We do not... [8:46] The witness already said he is not a lawyer. [8:48] Yet, the counsel for the prosecution is insisting to ask these questions. [8:53] We do not see how this is relevant. [8:55] The witness is incompetent. [8:56] We just ask that these impertinent questions be disallowed. [9:00] Your Honor, first, the witness never said that he was not a lawyer. [9:04] But I know that he is not a lawyer. [9:05] But I am just asking him if he's familiar because this is a premise for the next questions that I will ask. [9:14] I'm just asking him if he's familiar, Your Honor. [9:17] By way of preliminary, Mr. Chad, familiar po ba kayo o hindi? [9:24] Okay lang naman sabihin, oo, hindi. [9:27] Are you familiar with the constitutional provisions cited by Attorney Ray? [9:32] Hindi po. [9:33] Sige, papakita ko po sa inyo. [9:35] Can we request that the first slide be... [9:38] Counsel, move along, counsel. [9:42] Because the court can take judicial notice of that already, counsel. [9:46] At bukod pa dun sa Section 1, Article 11 ng Constitution, [9:51] nandiyan din po yan dun sa Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards of Public Officers and Employees. [9:57] Nakalagay po yan sa Section 4H. [9:59] At this point, I will have to object because this is already a speech citing provisions, Your Honor. [10:07] This is not a question. [10:08] The witness early on has already stated that he's not a lawyer. [10:12] Could I be allowed to finish my question? [10:14] Because it is a premise for my question, Your Honor. [10:16] Attorney Ray, you have to forgive me. [10:19] It's quite obvious what you're leading towards. [10:21] This is a proper subject matter for your summation, if any, at the proper time. [10:28] Again, the lawsuit you're citing, the court takes judicial notice of it. [10:33] The witness already answered. [10:35] He's not familiar with the first one. [10:37] I already allowed that. [10:38] And you said it yourself. [10:40] You know for a fact he's not a lawyer. [10:42] Yes, Your Honor. [10:42] And therefore, this is only for effect, so to speak. [10:46] No, Your Honor. [10:47] It's a premise for my question. [10:49] But anyway... [10:50] Then go to your question, Counselor. [10:51] Yes. [10:51] We'll proceed, Your Honor. [10:53] So, kanina po, sinabi niyo na sinagot ni Attorney Man Scarpio yung P256,000 na worth ng mga sapatos. [11:06] Sabi niyo ng mga bata. [11:07] Tama po ba? [11:09] Yes, po. [11:09] Opo. [11:10] Pakita na. [11:10] Pwede po daw ba natin makita yung letrato? [11:14] Yung una po, yung team na pinakita niyong huli. [11:19] Pwede pong makita? [11:20] The tech is instructed to kindly show the photo of the one showing the team with the shoes. [11:27] Correct, Attorney Ray? [11:28] Yes, Your Honor. [11:31] The team with their box of shoes. [11:35] Tech is waving her hand at me that she does not have a copy. [11:39] Did you get... [11:39] The one which was shown last, Your Honor? [11:42] It was just shown? [11:43] The one that was last shown... [11:52] Showing the members of the team with the... [11:54] Walang sapatos yun. [11:56] Opo. [11:57] Yung laku mo na, and we will proceed to the one with the shoes, Your Honor. [12:00] Okay. [12:01] Does the tech have a copy of the USB? [12:09] No. [12:10] We don't, Your Honor. [12:11] So can we request that the USB be returned to the... [12:14] This has already been previously marked and stipulated to by councils. [12:22] Can we borrow the USB? [12:23] Yes, please. [12:25] Mr. Chad, can you give? [12:27] Without prejudice to assisting council, of course, observing. [12:32] I think it's the last photo of the team in the sequence given in the USB. [13:01] The one shown or not? [13:02] Yes. [13:02] Okay. [13:04] Yan po. [13:05] Ang membro po ng team dyan, yung nakaupo at saka yung isang nakatayo, tama po ba? [13:11] Tama po. [13:12] At silang pong lahat, eh, sampo? [13:15] Tama po ba? [13:16] Eleven po sila lahat. [13:17] Eleven. [13:17] Okay. [13:19] Puntahan po natin yung pinakitan yung letrato na sinasabi niyong si attorney Manscarpio at saka yung mga sapatos. [13:35] Tech, can we show the picture shown earlier? [13:59] Yun pong mga sapatos na nakikita natin, yun po. [14:04] Yes, po. [14:05] Lampas po ng sampo yan. [14:07] Lampas po ng labing isa. [14:08] Tama po ba? [14:08] Yes, po. [14:09] Tama po. [14:09] At kung lumalabas, kung 256,000, ang sinasabi niyo, sasampo yung miembro, [14:18] or eleven yung miembro, 23,000 bawat bata na sapatos. [14:26] Parang hindi yata nagtutugma yun. [14:31] What is the question, Your Honor? [14:33] Your Honor, the witness testified earlier. [14:36] No, no, no. I'm asking what your question is. [14:37] You just made a statement, attorney. [14:39] Forgive me. [14:39] I'm asking the witness. [14:43] Ang sinasabi niya, yung mga sapatos para sa team members, [14:48] labing isa yung team members, [14:49] itong sapatos na yan, nandyan sa nakikita natin, [14:53] 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24. [15:02] So, hindi exactly tama na para dun sa mga bata lang yung sapatos. [15:09] Tama po ba? [15:09] Tama po. Correct po. [15:10] Apo. [15:11] At kung kukwentahin kasi, sa bawat isa, [15:16] 23,000 ang equivalent bawat bata, kung sa labing isa lang yun. [15:20] Ah, not exactly 23,000 per kid po. [15:27] Sure. [15:28] Pwede po natin makita itong isang letrato na binigay niyo dito. [15:37] Which picture? [15:38] Picture with the group posing with the shoes. [15:44] With the bags of shoes. [15:46] Yes. [15:46] The next picture after this one, Tech. [15:49] Yes. [15:53] Yung sumunod po sa sequence ng pictures. [15:55] So, makikita po natin dito na hindi lang po yung mga bata ang inilibre ng sapatos ni Atty. Carfio. [16:11] Tama po ba? [16:13] Tama po. [16:13] Opo. Kasi may mga babae pangaho dito na may mga sapatos na dala. [16:17] Tama po ba? [16:18] Tama po. [16:18] Okay. [16:19] Ngayon, ang tanong ko po, sabi niyo po kanina, kayo rin po naman kahit pa paano nakakaangat sa buhay. [16:25] Di po ba? [16:28] Sakto lang po naman. [16:29] Ilang beses po kayong naglibre ng sapatos na kagaya nito? [16:32] May nabigyan din lang po kung mga sapatos. [16:36] Pero yung ganito, na ganyang kadami? [16:38] Ay, it's not good. [16:39] Na P256,000? [16:40] Hindi ko po kaya yan. [16:42] Hindi niyo po kaya? [16:42] Okay. [16:44] Ngayon, ito yung tanong ko, kaya kung gusto i-flash kanina yung nakalagay sa batas. [16:49] Ito po bang ganitong paggastos ng P256,000 para man libre ng sapatos? [16:57] Eh, ito po ba'y halimbawa ng isang kapamilya ng public official na namumuhay ng simple at payak? [17:13] Ito po ba'y halimbawa nun? [17:18] Can you repeat the question, sir? [17:19] Ang nakalagay po sa batas kasi natin, ang isang public official at ang miyembro ng kanyang pamilya ay dapat they should live simple lives. [17:32] They should avoid ostentatious display of wealth in any form. [17:38] Ito po ba'y isang example ng simple at payak na pamumuhay? [17:47] Maglibre ka ng sapatos ng lahat ng tao dyan? [17:51] Objection, Your Honor. [17:53] Calls for an opinion, Your Honor. [17:54] Well, Your Honor, this witness was presented exactly to try to prove. [17:59] It's also misleading, Your Honor. [18:00] It is not, Your Honor. [18:02] It's not misleading, Counsel. [18:03] Your Honor, it's misleading. [18:05] The witness, apologies, Your Honor. [18:06] The witness already testified earlier na tumulong, Your Honor. [18:09] Already testified what, Attorney Justin? [18:12] Tumulong. [18:16] What do you mean, Attorney Justin? [18:19] Earlier, Your Honor, the witness testified that ibang mga bata walang kaya. [18:23] I think that's in the record, Your Honor. [18:26] What's the objection, Your Honor? [18:27] I'll have to overrule your objection, Attorney Justin. [18:30] So, ito po ba'y halimbawa? [18:33] Kung alam niyo po, kung may opinion po kayo, pananaw ka ognay dyan, or wala. [18:38] You're free to answer, whatever you said. [18:40] I cannot comment on the way the Attorney Manassas was thinking. [18:49] Tama po. [18:50] My opinion po is, hindi ko po alam, I cannot answer for him po. [18:54] You cannot answer for him. [18:55] I'm not asking you to answer for him. [18:56] I'm just asking you, if you consider this, kung ito po ay makukonsidera na simpleng pamumuhay, yung paglibre ng ganyang kadaming sapato sa napakadaming tao? [19:07] Well, I think deserved naman po ng mga bata at saka ng ibang mga magulang. [19:13] Wala po akong doubt na deserved ng mga bata. [19:17] Pero hindi lang naman ang bata yung minlow out niya dito eh. [19:21] Lahat nung nandun. [19:24] Yan ba ay halimbawa ng simpleng pamumuhay na nakatakda sa ating batas para sa pamilya ng public officer? [19:32] Your Honor, the witness already answered. [19:34] Witness already answered. You've made your point, Attorney Ray. [19:38] I think that would be all for the witness, Your Honor.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →