About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of House Impeachment team press briefing I June 15, 2026 from UNTV News and Rescue, published June 16, 2026. The transcript contains 13,522 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Good morning to our honorable House leaders, members of the press, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the House of Representatives. I'm Ryan Ponce-Pakpaco, your moderator. Today's press conference will provide updates on the ongoing impeachment trial against the Vice President. And joining us this..."
[16:30] Good morning to our honorable House leaders, members of the press, ladies and gentlemen,
[16:36] welcome to the House of Representatives. I'm Ryan Ponce-Pakpaco, your moderator.
[16:41] Today's press conference will provide updates on the ongoing impeachment trial against the
[16:46] Vice President. And joining us this morning, our House Lead Prosecutor and House Commitment
[16:53] Justice Careperson, Attorney General Bill Ginkie Beatrix Loistro of Batangas, House Prosecutor
[17:00] Isabel Maria Bell Jay Zamora of San Juan, and House Trial Spokesperson Zia Alonto Adyong
[17:08] of Lano Del Sur. Let us hear the opening remarks of the group through our Lead Prosecutor Loistro.
[17:15] Good morning, everyone. So today, we are scheduled to file our pre-trial brief.
[17:27] As previously announced, today is the deadline for the filing of this pleading. And for the
[17:34] understanding of our beloved countrymen, ano po ba ang kahalagahan nitong pre-trial brief?
[17:40] Number one, it contains stipulations of facts which will be presented for the other parties
[17:48] either admission or denial. With this, nababawasan po yung pagtatalunan ng dalawang kampo during the
[18:00] trial. If they have admit our offer for stipulation, it means it need not be proved. But if they deny
[18:07] our offer for stipulation, then it means it has to be proven during the presentation of evidence.
[18:13] Second, part of the pre-trial brief, we will be submitting as well the list of our witnesses, no? So,
[18:22] I wish to advance information, bagaman I cannot provide details yet, because we continue to finalize
[18:30] the pre-trial brief, perhaps until the time of filing today. It is more than 25. The witnesses is not only 25,
[18:39] it's not only 30, it's even more. As to the exact figure, and who these witnesses are, let's wait until
[18:50] the pre-trial brief is filed with the impeachment court today, no? And then for the last item,
[18:57] that will be the evidence to be marked, madami, superdami, because you know that there are two articles
[19:08] that are really voluminous on our exhibits. That includes the allegations on the confidential fund,
[19:15] and the allegations on unexplained wealth. And of course, we are anticipating that on June 18,
[19:24] the 11 prosecutors together with the 10 private prosecutors who were introduced during the last
[19:30] press conference, I mag-a-attend doon sa impeachment court, although this will be held before the clerk of court,
[19:39] who is our Secretary of Senate, General Bantug, no? We wish to formalize as well during the pre-trial
[19:47] conference, as to the position of the impeachment court, whether open rule will be adopted, no? Pag sinabi
[19:55] nating open rule, ibig sabihin, the subject matter of cross, re-cross can go beyond what was touched during
[20:05] direct and redirect, no? That means open rule. Otherwise, the cross or re-cross should be confined only to
[20:16] the subject matters which were touched during the direct examination and cross-examination. I wish to
[20:24] formalize as well on this upcoming pre-trial conference the possibility of us, the prosecutors,
[20:34] and even the defense to use Filipino language when the same is possible because I understand that there
[20:42] are legal terminologies which are really hard to translate, no? This is because we understand that
[20:49] this is a constitutional process. This is not purely legal. What is at stake is the interest of the
[20:56] Filipino people. So it is our intention that everything that happens during the impeachment trial should be
[21:03] understandable on the part of the ordinary Filipinos, no? And I wish to reach out as well through this
[21:13] opportunity to the mainstream media and even the social media. Let us encourage the accurate
[21:22] dissemination of information, no? And as a matter of fact, I reach out to the leadership as well.
[21:29] At ito rin ang gusto kong ilapit kay Kong Ziya and the other members of the house who are from Visayas,
[21:36] from Mindanao. Let us come up with simultaneous translation of the trial which will be held on
[21:46] starting on July 6th. Sana habang nag-tratrial, meron tayong translation to as many dialects as possible
[21:55] in order to make sure that the entire Philippine nation is on the same page. After all, this is a
[22:01] constitutional process. We want the entire nation to walk with us as we start, continue, and conclude the
[22:11] impeachment trial. Thank you. Thank you from Rosalie Cass of UNTB. Good morning po, Kongs. Kongs,
[22:23] regarding po dito sa, ay kay Kong Jerville po, nag-increase from the number of 25 yun pong witnesses.
[22:31] Pwede pong malaman without saying or stating the details, ito po ba dahil dun sa panibagong
[22:36] ebedensya po na nakuha po ng house prosecution panel with regards dun sa undeclared wealth?
[22:42] It is because we recognize the rule that only those witnesses whose names were submitted during
[22:52] pre-trial will be allowed to testify during the trial, no? So if before we're trying to limit
[23:01] corroborative witnesses, we're selecting only the most important witnesses, we wanted to make sure
[23:09] that all testimony will be presented in court, and that is why we considered other witnesses
[23:17] whose testimony are likewise significant, no? I am not very much familiar with the, I understand
[23:23] it's the comment of Congressman Terry Ridon. Perhaps that includes also the witnesses that he is referring
[23:32] to in support of the allegations on unexplained wealth. Ang malinaw po dito, sa ilalim po ng ating
[23:41] rules, kapag ang testigo, hindi mo naisama ang pangalan dun sa pre-trial, generally speaking,
[23:50] hindi po siya papayagang tumistigo during the trial. And that is why, as a matter of rule,
[23:57] lawat ng testigo yung isasalang mo, dapat yung pangalan, isumiti mo during the pre-trial
[24:03] conference. And their names must be included in the pre-trial brief.
[24:07] Does it mean din po kung na determined na po yun pong mga bank officials na i-invite sa paglilitis?
[24:16] We have no communication with the bank officials, but since the proceeding in the Justice Committee,
[24:24] it has always been the intention of the House of Representatives to include the bank representatives
[24:31] and the bank documents among the evidence which will be presented by the prosecution team.
[24:38] If I may add, in the pre-trial brief, we are, while the general rule is that we have to list down all of
[24:51] the names of the witnesses that we will be presenting during trial, we are allowed to withhold certain
[25:00] names for security and safety purposes. There is also, there is also, we are also allowed to make a
[25:10] reservation of witnesses as long as we are able to give a description of the witness and the purpose
[25:21] for which they will be presented. So, regarding the bank officials, for example, it is possible that we
[25:30] will not yet say the names of these persons, but there will be a description of their position and or the
[25:37] purpose of their testimony. In addition, doon sa sinabi ni Kong Bell, no? In fact, it applies not only to
[25:47] witnesses, it applies even to documents which are not yet available during the conduct of pre-trial, no?
[25:55] In simple terms, the parties are allowed to make a reservation in the pre-trial brief and during the
[26:03] pre-trial conference provided we give a reasonable description of who this witness is, what will be the nature of the testimony,
[26:15] and what is the purpose to be achieved by presenting this witness, no? Reservation is allowed during the pre-trial
[26:23] and the reason why it is being allowed is because of safety and security, that's one, in case of witnesses
[26:32] and for documents because they are not yet available.
[26:36] Last na lang po on my part. Doon po ba sa motion din po na isusumiti po ng House Prosecution Panel,
[26:45] may anything about the issue on Senate leadership? Because I believe po, any motion for example to resolve kung sino ang
[26:55] presiding officer? Because sabi niyo po kung Jervil, kung kayo po yung tatanungin, mas dapat pong magkaroon na ng
[27:05] julie-elected Senate President pero wala po kasing session ngayon, so hindi makakapag-elect ng Senate President.
[27:12] You were watching my interview. For the record, the House of Representatives already recognized the leadership
[27:23] of acting SP Wingachalian. As a matter of fact, we articulated already that we will be appearing before the impeachment court
[27:33] initiated by acting SP Wingachalian, who nowadays is the one signing the notices in his capacity as presiding officer.
[27:44] I express that concern because I understand that impeachment is a very sensitive matter.
[27:55] Why sensitive? You know what happened to the first impeachment back in the 19th Congress?
[28:00] We are of the humble position that we complied strictly. The requirements for the second mode of filing an impeachment complaint
[28:11] and for transmitting the same to the Senate, no? That has been the general stand of the House of Representatives.
[28:17] But nonetheless, you know that later on, it was declared unconstitutional by the Honorable Supreme Court, no?
[28:24] Regardless of our strong position. So, with that in mind, it is really my concern that I hope
[28:32] magkaroon na ng duly elected Senate President. If it is acting SP Wingachalian, well, we will welcome that.
[28:43] If it will be someone else, we will welcome that. Because that is the judgment and prerogative of the members of the Senate.
[28:51] The reason is, we are apprehensive that we might encounter another constitutional issue.
[28:59] Because we will be starting the trial and there is no duly elected Senate President.
[29:07] That is, of course, why we recognize the leadership of elected Senate President pro tempore and acting Senate President Wingachalian.
[29:20] I hope that it will be addressed so that there is no apprehension of the House about another possible constitutional issue to be raised in the Supreme Court.
[29:31] Just in addition to that, I think it's not only the integrity of the Senate that we're talking here.
[29:41] It's also for the purpose of providing clarity to the people.
[29:45] Because in the coming days, once the actual trial begins, we anticipate that there is going to be a huge investment in terms of the people watching the impeachment trial.
[29:57] So, for clarity and for the purpose of having a Senate without a leadership battle, it's our utmost understanding and plea,
[30:12] and if we can appeal, that the Senate would have a legitimate, uncontested leader for the purpose of clarity of the public.
[30:22] Clarification yun lang po, sorry. So, ayaw nyo pong mag-start ang impeachment trial unless ma-resolve yung issue sa Senate leadership?
[30:33] That is just an expression of our apprehension. But we submit, of course, to the jurisdiction of the impeachment court under the current leadership, no?
[30:46] Kung meron silang notices for hearing na, we will appear. That is just an expression of our apprehension that it will be best
[30:53] na magkaroon muna ng duly elected Senate President before we proceed to trial.
[30:58] No, I have no intention of formalizing that concern.
[31:07] Thank you, Rose. We go now to Haji Camino of Brigada News.
[31:18] Hi, Kongs. Good morning po. Follow up lang po dun sa plan or sa call na magkaroon ng translation sa iba't ibang dialect.
[31:33] Paano po ito gagawin? Is it through the communities po ba? It will be held sa mga communities or sa mainstream media? Paano po ba yung magiging execution po na?
[31:47] I think that's an ongoing discussion that we are having with the comms team.
[31:51] Kasi what we intend to provide to the public is the widest information, easy to understand for the public, for our public.
[32:02] Kasi tama pa yung sinabi ni Chairperson Jinky na in the coming days, once the impeachment trial begins, the audience will be, you know, we will be hearing technical legal terms that are not necessarily quite understandable, easily to understand by the public.
[32:22] So those are the things that we also want to explore.
[32:27] Ang intention po talaga natin dito is mabigyang servisyo ang ating mga kababayan na maintindihan nila ang pinag-usapan sa impeachment trial dahil matagal na po ito pinag-usapan at deserve po nila malaman ng katotohanan.
[32:41] At ganoon po kayo ka-confident kung na through these means or way of communicating to the public, paano po siya makakatulong, not just to secure conviction of course, but para po mas maipabatid sa taong bayan po yung kahalagahan ng impeachment process?
[33:01] Well, unang-una para sa kanila ito kasi ang nagsasalita po dito ay ang ating Constitution.
[33:07] Ang Constitution, parate po natin sinasabi na ang impeachment trial ay this is a constitutional duty given to the House to initiate and then for the Senate to try and decide.
[33:22] Nandun na po tayo dun sa posisyon kung saan ang Senado ay pag-usapan in an open trial kung ano po yung mga allegations against the Vice President.
[33:31] Isa po ito, remember, this is going to be the first time that the sitting Vice President will be tried in an open court, in an impeachment court.
[33:40] First time po ito.
[33:41] So this will also set the precedence in the coming years.
[33:44] Paano po ang ating mga kababayan, hindi lang po mamakita nila kung ano yung actual na trial, pero kung ano yung mga pinag-uusapan na naayon doon sa pinispelled out ng Constitution na mga violations.
[34:02] Na constituting an impeachable offense.
[34:05] So para po maintindihan ng ating mga kababayan, as a form of educating also our public, not only to provide them the services via informing them accurate information that would be easily understood by them,
[34:19] but it was also educating them on what are the allegations and what are the possible violations that would constitute an impeachable offense for the appreciation of the coming generations.
[34:32] To Kong Jingqi and Kong Bel, paano po kung halimbawang questionin ng defense team yung pagkakaroon po ng bagong ebidensya ng mga witnesses po natin?
[34:47] Kung baga, te-technical din po nila na wala naman daw po sa House Committee on Justice hearings po yun, kaya naman sa articles of impeachment.
[34:54] Well, we have said on many occasions that the evidence that we will be presenting are all either those that were in the articles,
[35:10] those that were presented during the Committee on Justice hearings, and all other relevant evidence that is in fact stated in the rules of the House of Representatives on impeachment proceedings.
[35:23] So everything will be relevant, everything will be relevant, everything will be related to the allegations or the articles of impeachment.
[35:33] Now, we have our pretrial brief that we will be submitting today, nakalagay naman po lahat dyan except those that will be made under a reservation that we will make,
[35:47] but there will be at least a general description of all of the evidence that we will present.
[35:54] So we follow the general rule that there will be no surprise witnesses or surprise evidence.
[36:01] We will lay out in our pretrial brief all of the evidence that we will present or those with reservations that we are allowed to make anyway.
[36:13] Maliwanag ang nakasaad sa ating konstitusyon.
[36:19] The House of Representatives has exclusive power to initiate all impeachment cases.
[36:28] The Senate has exclusive power to try and decide all impeachment cases.
[36:34] And along those lines, binigyan ang kapangyarihan ang House of Representatives at ang Senado na maglatag ng rules regarding impeachment.
[36:44] It is very clear, both under the rules on impeachment of the House and the rules on impeachment of the Senate,
[36:53] that they can exercise compulsory process.
[36:57] This pertains to the issuance of subpoena ad testificandum, to compel witnesses to appear before the impeachment court,
[37:05] and subpoena duces tecum, that is for the production of documents.
[37:10] So regardless of the fact that the evidences were produced only during the trial,
[37:17] the position is that it's very much sanctioned by the Constitution.
[37:23] The purpose of this compulsory process is to aid the Senate during the trial.
[37:29] The same way that the purpose of compulsory process in the Justice Committee
[37:33] is to aid the committee in determining the existence or non-existence of probable cause.
[37:39] It is therefore very much legal, lawful, valid for both the House and the Senate
[37:46] to exercise this compulsory process for the production of documents
[37:52] and for compelling witnesses even when this evidence were not part of the impeachment complaint
[37:58] or the articles of impeachment.
[38:00] Last question na lang po. Sorry, sisingit ko lang po itong topic na to.
[38:06] Kasi in an interview po si Mayor Benji Magalong was asked regarding,
[38:12] may sinabi po siya na around 90, 9-0, 90% daw po ng members ng House of Representatives are corrupt.
[38:21] Dahil po sa, kumbaga, part na daw po ng sistema, it's a way of system na daw po na,
[38:28] kaya masasabing majority ng House members ay corrupt.
[38:31] Any reaction po to this? Thank you po.
[38:34] Well, as public officers and public officials,
[38:37] you know, we carry responsibility when we speak about certain matters, no?
[38:44] Not only to give clarity to the public but with precision.
[38:47] When I say precision, it has to also be backed up by evidence, solid evidence, no?
[38:51] So, we cannot dismiss that because we also do welcome any effort from any sectors in our society
[39:03] to call for accountability.
[39:05] In fact, the House of Representatives has been standing on the principle of accountability.
[39:10] We've been doing a lot of committee hearings, we've been doing a lot of inquiries.
[39:15] In fact, the Committee on Justice is one of the example by which we can say proudly
[39:20] that the House of Representatives called for accountability of public officials.
[39:26] But accountability also should be coupled with the observance of due process.
[39:33] A due process demands that any accusations made against anybody or any institution
[39:39] should be backed up by a concrete evidence.
[39:43] So, it is, to me, it is quite irresponsible and unfair to just brush the entire institution
[39:56] with single stroke and to say that 90% of the members are corrupt.
[40:02] What about those?
[40:04] You know, you should be judged based on our individual work.
[40:10] We should, there are 300 plus members of the House of Representatives.
[40:15] Each of us are directly voted by the people.
[40:19] And so, we, I think it's also as a matter of due process because we're talking about accountability.
[40:25] It should, accountability cannot stand on its own without also complying with due process.
[40:29] So, it is not quite fair to just sweep the entire House with one branding.
[40:38] These are, allegations such as this should be backed by hard and concrete evidence.
[40:44] So, we welcome those people who are calling for accountability.
[40:48] But it should be precise and it should be targeted to a specific individual
[40:53] and not to destroy the entire reputation of the House,
[40:57] which, by the way, as opposed to that statement,
[41:00] the House has been standing with accountability.
[41:04] We've been doing a lot of work.
[41:06] We've been doing a lot of inquiries in order to sort out allegations of corruption.
[41:12] So, to me, you know, we understand that the mayor is an advocate of corruption
[41:22] but as he himself, as an investigator,
[41:26] he knows that such accusations should be backed up by evidences.
[41:32] Let me just add, if he has names, it's better to name names
[41:36] rather than to attack the entire institution.
[41:42] Sorry po, last na lang po, follow.
[41:44] I mean, sing it ko lang din po, sorry po.
[41:46] Last na lang po talaga.
[41:48] Tomorrow, meron pong Blue Ribbon Committee hearing
[41:53] na pangungunahan po ng group ni Senator Alan Peter Quetano,
[41:58] Senator Marco Leta,
[42:00] pero hindi po sa Senate premises gagawin.
[42:02] I understand parang sa labas po yata ng Senado gagawin.
[42:06] Any reaction lang po na,
[42:07] syempre leadership issues pa rin po,
[42:09] pero itutuloy pa rin po nila yung
[42:11] so-called Blue Ribbon Committee hearing po.
[42:15] Well, personally, this does not reflect the position
[42:23] of the House Prosecution Team,
[42:25] but since you've mentioned about a separate investigation
[42:31] or continuing Blue Ribbon Committee,
[42:33] I don't think even within the Senate,
[42:36] the current leadership now sanctioned
[42:41] this parallel Blue Ribbon investigation.
[42:43] It only validates our previous observation
[42:48] that this is just a PR stunt
[42:51] to divert the attention of the public
[42:55] from the issue of impeachment.
[42:57] Remember, the impeachment trial
[42:59] is a constitutionally mandated priority
[43:05] of the Senate right now.
[43:07] They have already convened as an impeachment court,
[43:09] and I think the people deserves clarity
[43:13] and closure on the subject matter
[43:17] that are being allegedly committed by the Vice President.
[43:22] So, I think it's just a diversionary tactic,
[43:27] if you ask me,
[43:28] my humble observation,
[43:30] to create a parallel issue
[43:33] that actually would, in a way,
[43:37] sway the attention of the public.
[43:41] But the public knows
[43:43] and the public knows
[43:45] that the primordial concern now of the Senate,
[43:50] since they have already convened
[43:51] as an impeachment court,
[43:52] is to exercise their exclusive power
[43:55] granted to them by the Constitution,
[43:57] because no agency,
[43:58] no institution in the government
[44:00] has that exclusive power
[44:02] to proceed with the impeachment trial
[44:07] than the Senate.
[44:08] So, this is the priority of the Senate,
[44:10] and the people knows
[44:12] that this is the priority of the Senate
[44:13] and deserves to know the truth,
[44:15] and for a speedy trial also.
[44:17] So, again, going back to that issue,
[44:20] just to give you a short answer,
[44:23] it only reinforces our earlier observation
[44:25] that this is just a distraction,
[44:28] a diversionary tactic,
[44:30] and a PR stunt.
[44:31] If I may add,
[44:35] the prosecutors will not muddle ourselves,
[44:39] muddle our time with, you know,
[44:41] the Senate leadership issues.
[44:44] But we recognize the leadership
[44:48] of Senate President Pro Temporary Gatchalian,
[44:53] as this has been recognized by Malacanang,
[44:56] by all law schools,
[44:57] by law professors,
[44:59] justices of the Supreme Court.
[45:01] And there is every reason to believe
[45:04] the interpretation
[45:08] of the Evelino v. Cuenco doctrine.
[45:11] So, as of the moment,
[45:14] we have been following
[45:15] the leadership
[45:17] of Senator Gatchalian,
[45:20] and we are,
[45:21] in fact,
[45:22] we submitted our pleadings
[45:25] before the impeachment court
[45:27] under his leadership.
[45:29] Thus,
[45:30] we,
[45:31] while we recognize
[45:34] that it is within their right
[45:38] to hold such
[45:39] meetings
[45:41] outside the Senate,
[45:44] they may do so,
[45:46] of course,
[45:46] but then,
[45:47] again,
[45:47] we follow the leadership
[45:49] of Senator Gatchalian.
[45:50] If I may add,
[45:56] yung gagawin nila,
[45:58] perhaps you can charge that
[45:59] to freedom of expression.
[46:02] But in as far as
[46:03] legitimate inquiry
[46:04] and aid of legislation
[46:06] is concerned,
[46:07] let us remember that
[46:08] we have
[46:10] the new leadership
[46:11] in the Senate.
[46:12] Everything that they should do
[46:14] in order that
[46:16] it will fall
[46:17] within the purview
[46:18] of a Senate inquiry
[46:20] in aid of legislation,
[46:21] it must be sanctioned
[46:23] by the leadership.
[46:24] Nonetheless,
[46:25] with all due respect
[46:26] sa kanila,
[46:28] it is a legitimate exercise
[46:29] of freedom of expression.
[46:36] Thank you,
[46:36] Haji.
[46:37] We now recognize
[46:38] Annalisa Verano
[46:39] of Bombo Radio.
[46:43] Good morning po,
[46:45] Congressman.
[46:46] Representative
[46:47] Jervie Luistro po,
[46:48] kung kahit sino po
[46:49] sa inyong tatlo.
[46:50] Ma'am,
[46:51] bukod po sa naging
[46:52] itong evidencia
[46:54] na binanggit
[46:55] ni Representative
[46:57] Terry Redon,
[46:58] can you tell
[46:59] the public today
[47:00] whether there is
[47:01] a piece of evidence
[47:02] in your possession
[47:03] that has not yet
[47:05] been publicly disclosed
[47:07] and that you believe
[47:09] could significantly
[47:10] affect the outcome
[47:11] of the trial?
[47:12] The least I can say
[47:14] is sapagkat ito naman
[47:15] noon pa namin
[47:16] pinopronounce
[47:17] yung bank documents
[47:20] yung bank representatives
[47:22] which even us,
[47:24] we do not have them
[47:25] yet in our possession.
[47:27] So during the trial,
[47:29] upon the subpoena
[47:31] issued by
[47:32] the impeachment court,
[47:34] the prosecutors
[47:35] together with
[47:36] the other party
[47:37] and the Filipino people,
[47:39] together we will be
[47:40] witnessing
[47:41] kung anong ilalabas
[47:42] ng bank representatives
[47:44] along with
[47:45] the bank documents.
[47:47] Okay,
[47:47] so magiging
[47:47] surprise evidence
[47:48] ito, ma'am?
[47:49] Yes.
[47:51] Ma'am,
[47:51] follow up.
[47:52] Surprise in the sense
[47:53] na hindi pa nakikita.
[47:54] But of course,
[47:55] that's part of our list
[47:56] of documents
[47:57] to be marked.
[47:58] Yun sinabi ni Belka
[47:59] nina,
[48:00] reservation
[48:01] of documents
[48:03] to be marked
[48:03] because they are not
[48:04] yet available
[48:05] as of the moment.
[48:06] No?
[48:07] That's part of the list
[48:08] of documents
[48:09] to be reserved
[48:10] in our pre-trial brief.
[48:12] But surprise in the sense
[48:13] that even us,
[48:14] we have not seen yet
[48:15] the bank documents
[48:17] and we have not
[48:17] heard yet
[48:18] the bank representatives.
[48:20] Okay.
[48:21] Ma'am, follow up.
[48:22] Yung pre-trial kasi
[48:23] remain closed
[48:25] sa media.
[48:26] So what information
[48:27] will you commit
[48:28] to disclosing
[48:29] afterwards
[48:30] so the public
[48:30] can follow
[48:31] the proceedings?
[48:32] That's one
[48:33] of my list
[48:35] of concerns
[48:36] which I will
[48:36] articulate
[48:37] during our
[48:38] pre-trial conference.
[48:40] One is
[48:41] the possibility
[48:41] of sharing
[48:43] what is happening
[48:43] with the media
[48:44] after all
[48:45] this is part
[48:46] of the constitutional
[48:47] process of the impeachment
[48:48] trial.
[48:49] Second,
[48:50] yung nabanggit ko
[48:51] kaninang open rule
[48:52] whether it will be
[48:54] adopted
[48:54] or otherwise.
[48:56] By open rule
[48:57] it means
[48:57] na even matters
[48:59] which are outside
[49:01] the direct
[49:02] and the cross
[49:03] may be raised
[49:04] during
[49:04] the direct
[49:05] and redirect
[49:06] may be raised
[49:08] during
[49:08] cross
[49:09] and recross.
[49:10] and then
[49:12] the dialect
[49:13] translation
[49:14] to as many
[49:15] dialects
[49:15] as possible
[49:16] na pinaliwanag
[49:18] din ni Kong
[49:18] Ziyad
[49:19] and then
[49:20] the possibility
[49:21] of formalizing
[49:23] that the parties
[49:25] can actually
[49:26] use Filipino
[49:27] during the trial
[49:28] that is for
[49:29] the better
[49:29] understanding
[49:30] also of our
[49:31] countrymen
[49:31] and one more
[49:33] thing that I
[49:34] did not mention
[49:35] kanina
[49:35] we wish
[49:36] to invoke
[49:38] the policy
[49:39] of substance
[49:40] over technicalities
[49:42] because
[49:42] again
[49:43] this is not
[49:44] a purely
[49:44] legal process
[49:45] ang importante
[49:47] dito
[49:47] lumabas ang katotohanan
[49:48] and therefore
[49:49] evidence should be
[49:51] presented
[49:51] all of them
[49:52] and should not
[49:54] be challenged
[49:54] always on
[49:55] technical grounds
[49:56] substance
[49:57] over technicalities
[49:58] so these are
[50:00] the concerns
[50:01] that we will be
[50:01] raising
[50:02] kasama dun
[50:03] yung possibility
[50:04] of you
[50:04] the media
[50:05] people
[50:06] from being allowed
[50:07] in the
[50:08] pre-trial conference
[50:09] but of course
[50:09] this will be
[50:10] the judgment
[50:11] of the impeachment
[50:12] court
[50:13] pwede lang
[50:14] namin yun
[50:15] i-pronounce
[50:16] i-articulate
[50:17] but at the
[50:17] end of the
[50:18] day
[50:18] whatever will
[50:19] be the
[50:19] decision
[50:20] of the
[50:20] impeachment
[50:20] court
[50:21] kaming
[50:22] prosecutors
[50:23] and even
[50:24] the media
[50:24] people
[50:24] we will
[50:25] have to
[50:25] submit
[50:25] to their
[50:26] jurisdiction
[50:26] and authority
[50:27] ma'am
[50:28] last ma'am
[50:29] for my
[50:29] part
[50:30] do you
[50:30] believe
[50:31] that
[50:31] this
[50:31] closed
[50:31] door
[50:32] pre-trial
[50:32] helps
[50:33] or hurt
[50:34] public
[50:35] confidence
[50:35] in the
[50:36] impeachment
[50:36] process
[50:36] just a
[50:37] reaction
[50:38] wag kayong
[50:38] masyadong
[50:39] mag-alala dun
[50:40] sa
[50:40] media
[50:41] ay hindi
[50:42] inalaw
[50:42] sa pre-trial
[50:43] conference
[50:44] you know
[50:44] why
[50:44] this is
[50:45] like a
[50:46] meeting
[50:46] no
[50:47] and this
[50:48] is very
[50:49] time
[50:50] consuming
[50:50] because
[50:51] the
[50:52] parties
[50:53] will be
[50:53] discussing
[50:54] each
[50:55] and
[50:55] every
[50:56] offer
[50:56] of
[50:57] stipulation
[50:58] ayun sa
[50:59] amin palang
[50:59] andami
[51:00] tapos
[51:01] hintayin namin
[51:02] ang sagot
[51:02] ng defense
[51:03] admitted
[51:03] or denied
[51:04] same
[51:05] thing
[51:05] pagdating
[51:06] sa kanila
[51:07] iisa-isahin
[51:08] nila yung
[51:08] offer
[51:09] of
[51:09] stipulation
[51:10] aarali
[51:11] namin
[51:11] sasagot
[51:11] kami
[51:12] and then
[51:13] with regards
[51:14] to the
[51:15] documents
[51:16] there's a
[51:16] possibility
[51:17] na magkaroon din
[51:17] ang marking
[51:18] and this
[51:19] will take
[51:19] so much
[51:20] time
[51:20] ang
[51:21] sigurado
[51:22] by the
[51:23] time
[51:23] na mag-i-issue
[51:24] na ng
[51:24] pre-trial
[51:24] order
[51:25] ang impeachment
[51:26] court
[51:26] all the
[51:27] things
[51:27] that
[51:28] happen
[51:28] during
[51:28] the
[51:28] pre-trial
[51:29] conference
[51:29] will be
[51:30] manifested
[51:30] by both
[51:31] parties
[51:32] kung
[51:33] anuman
[51:33] yung
[51:33] stipulations
[51:34] ng
[51:34] prosecution
[51:35] na
[51:36] inadmit
[51:36] ng
[51:37] defense
[51:38] we will
[51:39] manifest
[51:39] that
[51:39] during
[51:40] the
[51:40] pre-trial
[51:41] same
[51:41] is
[51:42] true
[51:42] with
[51:42] respect
[51:42] to
[51:42] the
[51:43] defense
[51:43] dun
[51:44] sa
[51:44] stipulation
[51:44] of
[51:45] facts
[51:45] na
[51:45] inadmit
[51:45] ng
[51:46] prosecution
[51:46] even
[51:47] the
[51:47] list
[51:48] of
[51:48] our
[51:48] witnesses
[51:48] na
[51:49] napag-usapan
[51:50] during
[51:50] the
[51:50] conference
[51:51] we
[51:51] will
[51:51] be
[51:52] manifesting
[51:52] this
[51:52] during
[51:53] the
[51:53] pre-trial
[51:53] and
[51:54] all
[51:54] the
[51:54] documents
[51:55] mark
[51:56] or
[51:56] to be
[51:56] marked
[51:56] will
[51:57] be
[51:57] manifested
[51:57] as
[51:57] well
[51:58] not
[51:58] only
[51:59] by
[51:59] the
[51:59] prosecution
[51:59] but
[52:00] also
[52:01] by
[52:01] the
[52:01] defense
[52:01] in
[52:02] other
[52:02] words
[52:03] all
[52:04] of
[52:04] the
[52:04] pre-trial
[52:08] conference
[52:09] manifest
[52:10] during
[52:11] the
[52:11] pre-trial
[52:12] proper
[52:13] that
[52:14] is
[52:14] before
[52:14] the
[52:15] issuance
[52:15] of
[52:15] the
[52:16] pre-trial
[52:16] order
[52:16] so
[52:21] to add
[52:22] to
[52:22] that
[52:22] you
[52:23] will
[52:23] not
[52:23] be
[52:23] missing
[52:24] actually
[52:24] anything
[52:25] dahil
[52:26] lahat
[52:26] ng
[52:26] mangyayari
[52:27] sa
[52:27] conference
[52:28] ay
[52:28] imamanifest
[52:29] ng
[52:29] dalawang
[52:30] parties
[52:30] and
[52:31] even
[52:31] ng
[52:31] impeachment
[52:32] court
[52:33] pagdating
[52:34] ng
[52:34] pre-trial
[52:34] proper
[52:35] that's
[52:36] prior
[52:36] to
[52:36] the
[52:36] issuance
[52:37] of
[52:37] the
[52:37] pre-trial
[52:37] order
[52:38] thank
[52:41] you
[52:41] annalee
[52:41] we
[52:41] now
[52:42] call
[52:42] on
[52:42] eden
[52:43] santos
[52:43] from
[52:44] net
[52:45] 25
[52:45] hindi
[53:05] po kami
[53:05] takot
[53:06] in
[53:07] fact
[53:07] that
[53:07] directive
[53:08] came
[53:09] from
[53:09] the
[53:09] impeachment
[53:10] court
[53:10] it
[53:11] did
[53:11] not
[53:11] came
[53:11] from
[53:11] us
[53:12] nabasa
[53:13] na
[53:13] lang
[53:13] po
[53:13] namin
[53:14] yan
[53:14] sa
[53:14] notice
[53:15] for
[53:15] pre-trial
[53:17] conference
[53:17] and
[53:18] for
[53:18] the
[53:19] deadline
[53:19] of
[53:19] pre-trial
[53:20] brief
[53:20] as
[53:21] a
[53:21] matter
[53:22] of
[53:22] fact
[53:22] if
[53:22] the
[53:22] impeachment
[53:23] court
[53:23] will
[53:23] allow
[53:24] the
[53:25] media
[53:25] people
[53:26] during
[53:26] conference
[53:27] we
[53:27] will
[53:28] no
[53:29] but
[53:29] of
[53:31] course
[53:31] that
[53:31] is
[53:31] not
[53:32] because
[53:32] they
[53:33] are
[53:34] against
[53:34] transparency
[53:35] they
[53:36] are
[53:36] in
[53:36] favor
[53:37] of
[53:37] transparency
[53:38] as
[53:38] a
[53:38] matter
[53:39] of
[53:39] fact
[53:39] that
[53:39] is
[53:40] the
[53:40] very
[53:40] reason
[53:40] kung
[53:40] bakit
[53:41] merong
[53:41] impeachment
[53:42] trial
[53:42] I
[53:43] think
[53:43] the
[53:43] reason
[53:43] is
[53:44] expediency
[53:44] dahil
[53:46] napakahabang
[53:46] proseso
[53:47] nitong
[53:47] pre-trial
[53:48] conference
[53:49] na ito
[53:49] it may
[53:50] take
[53:50] two
[53:50] to
[53:50] three
[53:50] days
[53:51] and
[53:51] even
[53:51] more
[53:52] no
[53:52] at
[53:53] very
[53:53] technical
[53:54] ang
[53:54] pag-uusapan
[53:55] in
[53:55] the
[53:55] sense
[53:55] na
[53:56] hihimayin
[53:59] trial
[54:00] which
[54:00] ultimately
[54:01] makikita
[54:02] during
[54:03] pre-trial
[54:04] and
[54:04] trial
[54:05] proper
[54:05] so
[54:06] walang
[54:07] issue
[54:07] of
[54:07] transparency
[54:08] dito
[54:09] ang
[54:09] issue
[54:10] dito
[54:10] is
[54:10] expediency
[54:11] definitely
[54:12] the impeachment
[54:13] court
[54:14] is for
[54:14] the
[54:14] transparency
[54:15] and
[54:16] that
[54:16] is
[54:16] the
[54:16] reason
[54:16] why
[54:16] we
[54:17] will
[54:17] be
[54:17] holding
[54:17] this
[54:18] impeachment
[54:18] trial
[54:18] hindi
[54:25] po
[54:25] it
[54:27] was
[54:27] written
[54:27] in
[54:28] the
[54:28] notice
[54:28] of
[54:29] pre-trial
[54:29] conference
[54:30] nandun
[54:31] po
[54:31] nakalagay
[54:31] that
[54:32] it
[54:32] will
[54:32] not
[54:33] be
[54:33] open
[54:35] to
[54:35] the
[54:36] media
[54:36] but
[54:37] like
[54:39] I
[54:39] said
[54:39] in
[54:39] a
[54:40] previous
[54:40] interview
[54:41] we
[54:42] in
[54:42] fact
[54:42] want
[54:44] as
[54:45] prosecutors
[54:45] in
[54:45] fact
[54:45] wanted
[54:46] to
[54:46] be
[54:46] televised
[54:47] I
[54:47] think
[54:48] the
[54:48] reason
[54:48] behind
[54:49] it
[54:49] not
[54:49] being
[54:49] televised
[54:50] is
[54:50] that
[54:51] the
[54:52] impeachment
[54:52] court
[54:53] thinks
[54:53] that
[54:54] this
[54:54] will
[54:54] be
[54:54] too
[54:55] tedious
[54:55] too
[54:56] boring
[54:56] for
[54:57] people
[54:57] to
[54:57] watch
[54:58] ganito
[54:59] po
[54:59] ang
[54:59] mangyayari
[55:00] sa
[55:00] pre-trial
[55:01] conference
[55:02] kunyari
[55:05] babasahin
[55:06] ng
[55:06] pangalan
[55:06] ng
[55:07] isang
[55:07] ebidensya
[55:08] sasabihin
[55:09] we
[55:09] will
[55:09] mark
[55:10] that
[55:10] as
[55:10] our
[55:11] exhibit
[55:11] A
[55:12] our
[55:13] exhibit
[55:13] A
[55:14] dash
[55:14] one
[55:15] I
[55:15] think
[55:15] the
[55:16] impeachment
[55:17] court
[55:17] just
[55:17] wants
[55:18] to
[55:18] avoid
[55:21] the
[55:22] to
[55:23] spare
[55:23] the
[55:24] people
[55:24] this
[55:25] boring
[55:26] process
[55:28] but
[55:28] in
[55:28] any
[55:29] case
[55:29] everything
[55:30] will
[55:30] be
[55:31] written
[55:31] in
[55:32] or
[55:33] summarized
[55:33] in a
[55:34] pre-trial
[55:34] order
[55:35] that
[55:35] the
[55:36] impeachment
[55:37] court
[55:37] will
[55:38] come
[55:38] out
[55:38] with
[55:39] so
[55:40] hintayin
[55:40] po
[55:40] natin
[55:41] ang
[55:41] pre-trial
[55:41] order
[55:42] na
[55:42] ilalabas
[55:42] po
[55:43] ng
[55:43] impeachment
[55:43] court
[55:44] just to
[55:47] assuage
[55:47] the fear
[55:48] of
[55:48] some
[55:49] number
[55:49] one
[55:49] that's
[55:49] correct
[55:50] it's
[55:50] the
[55:51] call
[55:52] of
[55:52] the
[55:52] impeachment
[55:52] court
[55:53] the
[55:53] honorable
[55:53] impeachment
[55:54] court
[55:54] pre-trial
[55:57] number
[55:58] two
[55:58] if
[55:58] for
[55:59] example
[55:59] in
[56:00] term
[56:00] in
[56:00] a
[56:01] matter
[56:01] of
[56:01] transparency
[56:02] if
[56:05] without
[56:06] for
[56:06] example
[56:06] the
[56:07] without
[56:08] the
[56:09] court's
[56:09] direct
[56:10] order
[56:10] to
[56:10] disallow
[56:11] the
[56:12] prosecution
[56:13] to
[56:13] discuss
[56:13] for
[56:14] example
[56:14] after
[56:14] the
[56:15] pre-trial
[56:15] conference
[56:16] what
[56:16] transpired
[56:17] during
[56:18] the
[56:18] pre-trial
[56:21] eh
[56:21] andito
[56:22] naman
[56:22] po
[56:22] lead
[56:23] prosecutors
[56:23] lead
[56:25] prosecutor
[56:25] at saka
[56:26] mga
[56:26] prosecutors
[56:27] namin
[56:27] na
[56:28] ibahagi
[56:29] sa
[56:30] publiko
[56:30] kung
[56:31] ano
[56:31] yung
[56:31] napag
[56:32] usapan
[56:32] sa
[56:33] pre-trial
[56:34] conference
[56:35] without
[56:36] necessarily
[56:37] going
[56:37] into
[56:38] specific
[56:38] details
[56:39] so
[56:40] generally
[56:40] the
[56:41] house
[56:42] prosecution
[56:43] team
[56:43] would
[56:44] even
[56:44] ready
[56:45] to
[56:46] inform
[56:46] the
[56:47] public
[56:47] what
[56:47] transpired
[56:48] during
[56:49] the
[56:50] pre-trial
[56:50] conference
[56:51] assuming
[56:53] for
[56:54] example
[56:54] that
[56:54] there
[56:54] is
[56:55] no
[56:55] direct
[56:55] directive
[56:58] from
[56:58] the
[56:59] impeachment
[57:00] court
[57:00] not
[57:01] to
[57:01] divulge
[57:02] the
[57:02] information
[57:04] or
[57:04] to
[57:04] transpire
[57:05] so
[57:05] ready
[57:06] naman
[57:06] po
[57:06] ang
[57:06] house
[57:07] prosecution
[57:07] team
[57:07] to
[57:09] share
[57:10] to
[57:10] the
[57:10] public
[57:11] may
[57:11] bahagi
[57:11] sa
[57:11] publiko
[57:12] kung
[57:12] ano
[57:12] man
[57:13] yung
[57:13] mapag
[57:13] usapan
[57:14] ano
[57:15] yung
[57:15] mga
[57:15] naagrihan
[57:16] doon
[57:16] ano
[57:16] yung
[57:17] kinontest
[57:18] na mga
[57:19] evidencia
[57:20] anong
[57:20] inaccept
[57:20] na mga
[57:21] evidencia
[57:21] based
[57:22] on the
[57:22] stipulation
[57:23] of
[57:23] facts
[57:24] so
[57:24] ganun lang
[57:24] po
[57:24] so
[57:25] do not
[57:25] be
[57:25] fearful
[57:26] about
[57:26] throwing
[57:28] a
[57:29] dark
[57:30] blanket
[57:30] for
[57:30] the
[57:31] public
[57:31] not
[57:31] to
[57:32] be
[57:32] able
[57:32] to
[57:32] understand
[57:33] but
[57:33] later on
[57:34] I'm sure
[57:35] the
[57:36] house
[57:36] prosecution
[57:36] team
[57:37] will
[57:38] provide
[57:38] the
[57:38] public
[57:39] the
[57:39] necessary
[57:39] information
[57:40] that they
[57:40] need
[57:41] to
[57:54] have
[57:54] to
[57:55] free
[57:55] trial
[57:55] conference
[57:56] so
[57:56] hindi
[57:56] po
[57:56] para
[57:57] kami
[57:57] tumutol
[57:58] sa
[57:58] isang
[57:58] notice
[57:59] na
[57:59] nilabas
[58:00] po
[58:00] ng
[58:00] impeachment
[58:00] court
[58:01] what I can assure
[58:52] for the public
[58:53] with all due respect
[58:54] to the lead
[58:55] prosecutor
[58:55] and prosecutor
[58:56] do not fear
[58:58] of
[58:58] conaibans
[58:59] just to go
[59:00] straight to
[59:01] your point
[59:01] ma'am
[59:02] wala pong
[59:02] conaibans
[59:03] dito
[59:03] hindi po
[59:04] mangyayari
[59:05] yan
[59:05] nandun din po
[59:08] ang
[59:08] depensa
[59:08] so
[59:10] at
[59:11] tsaka
[59:11] ang
[59:12] korte po
[59:13] ang
[59:13] honorable
[59:13] impeachment
[59:14] court
[59:14] po
[59:15] ang
[59:15] nagbibigay
[59:15] ng
[59:15] notice
[59:16] tayo po
[59:16] nagko-comply
[59:17] po
[59:17] ang ating
[59:18] mga
[59:18] prosecution
[59:19] team
[59:20] dun po
[59:20] sa
[59:20] direktiba
[59:21] ng
[59:22] impeachment
[59:22] court
[59:23] para
[59:24] mas
[59:24] mapabilis
[59:25] mas
[59:25] mas
[59:25] simplify
[59:26] yung
[59:27] pag-uusapan
[59:27] sa
[59:27] korte
[59:28] kasi
[59:29] deserve
[59:29] din po
[59:30] ni
[59:30] vice
[59:31] president
[59:31] sara
[59:31] duterte
[59:32] ang
[59:32] speedy
[59:33] trial
[59:34] kaya
[59:34] sinisimplify
[59:35] po natin
[59:37] during
[59:38] the
[59:38] pre-trial
[59:38] conference
[59:39] yung
[59:39] pag-uusapan
[59:40] sa
[59:40] actual
[59:41] trial
[59:41] so
[59:42] just
[59:42] to
[59:42] give
[59:42] you
[59:42] a
[59:42] direct
[59:43] and
[59:43] you
[59:43] can
[59:44] quote
[59:44] me
[59:44] on
[59:44] this
[59:44] there
[59:45] will
[59:45] be
[59:45] no
[59:45] connivance
[59:46] because
[59:46] the
[59:46] defense
[59:47] team
[59:47] will
[59:47] also
[59:48] be
[59:48] there
[59:48] I
[59:51] just
[59:51] want
[59:52] to
[59:52] state
[59:52] for
[59:52] the
[59:52] record
[59:53] we
[59:54] are
[59:54] not
[59:54] against
[59:55] making
[59:56] the
[59:57] pre-trial
[59:58] conference
[59:58] open
[59:59] to
[59:59] public
[1:00:00] as
[1:00:00] a
[1:00:00] matter
[1:00:01] of
[1:00:01] fact
[1:00:01] we
[1:00:01] are
[1:00:02] in
[1:00:02] support
[1:00:02] of
[1:00:03] that
[1:00:03] however
[1:00:04] please
[1:00:09] the
[1:00:10] authority
[1:00:11] belongs
[1:00:12] to
[1:00:12] the
[1:00:12] impeachment
[1:00:12] court
[1:00:13] our
[1:00:14] obligation
[1:00:14] is to
[1:00:15] obey
[1:00:16] the
[1:00:16] impeachment
[1:00:17] court
[1:00:17] and
[1:00:19] lastly
[1:00:20] in
[1:00:20] relation
[1:00:21] to
[1:00:21] that
[1:00:22] kami
[1:00:22] prosecutors
[1:00:23] are
[1:00:24] lawyers
[1:00:24] and
[1:00:25] we
[1:00:26] as
[1:00:26] lawyers
[1:00:27] are
[1:00:27] officers
[1:00:28] of
[1:00:28] the
[1:00:28] court
[1:00:28] nasa
[1:00:30] ethics
[1:00:30] po
[1:00:31] namin
[1:00:31] yan
[1:00:31] kailangan
[1:00:32] po
[1:00:32] namin
[1:00:33] sumunod
[1:00:33] sa
[1:00:34] mga
[1:00:34] directiba
[1:00:35] ng
[1:00:35] bawat
[1:00:36] korte
[1:00:37] kung
[1:00:37] san
[1:00:37] kami
[1:00:37] po
[1:00:37] ay
[1:00:38] haharap
[1:00:38] and
[1:00:39] this
[1:00:39] includes
[1:00:39] the
[1:00:40] impeachment
[1:00:40] court
[1:00:41] so
[1:00:41] if
[1:00:41] it
[1:00:41] is
[1:00:41] their
[1:00:41] directive
[1:00:42] that
[1:00:43] the
[1:00:44] pretrial
[1:00:45] conference
[1:00:46] will be
[1:00:46] closed
[1:00:47] to
[1:00:47] media
[1:00:48] then
[1:00:49] we
[1:00:49] all
[1:00:50] will
[1:00:50] obey
[1:00:51] the
[1:00:52] impeachment
[1:00:53] court
[1:00:53] as
[1:00:53] officers
[1:00:54] of
[1:00:54] the
[1:00:54] court
[1:00:54] pagkasabi ko
[1:01:08] po
[1:01:08] some
[1:01:09] supreme
[1:01:09] court
[1:01:09] justices
[1:01:10] luminaries
[1:01:12] yes
[1:01:13] luminaries
[1:01:14] supreme court
[1:01:15] justices
[1:01:16] said
[1:01:16] that
[1:01:17] the
[1:01:19] Avelino
[1:01:20] versus
[1:01:20] Cuenco
[1:01:20] ruling
[1:01:21] stands
[1:01:22] I did
[1:01:23] not say
[1:01:23] that it
[1:01:24] is the
[1:01:24] supreme
[1:01:24] court
[1:01:25] as an
[1:01:25] institution
[1:01:26] there
[1:01:36] is a
[1:01:37] pending
[1:01:37] petition
[1:01:38] but
[1:01:39] there
[1:01:40] is no
[1:01:40] judgment
[1:01:42] on that
[1:01:42] wait
[1:01:44] that
[1:01:44] petition
[1:01:45] has been
[1:01:45] resolved
[1:01:45] already
[1:01:46] and
[1:01:47] sabi
[1:01:47] ng
[1:01:48] supreme
[1:01:48] court
[1:01:49] that
[1:01:49] issue
[1:01:50] on
[1:01:50] leadership
[1:01:50] is
[1:01:52] a
[1:01:53] non-justiciable
[1:01:54] issue
[1:01:54] because
[1:01:54] it
[1:01:55] concerns
[1:01:55] a
[1:01:56] political
[1:01:56] question
[1:01:57] so
[1:01:57] ito yung
[1:01:58] tinatawag
[1:01:59] natin
[1:01:59] doctrine
[1:02:00] of
[1:02:00] political
[1:02:00] question
[1:02:01] when it
[1:02:02] concerns
[1:02:03] the
[1:02:03] power
[1:02:04] of the
[1:02:04] agency
[1:02:05] which
[1:02:05] is
[1:02:05] exclusive
[1:02:05] to
[1:02:06] them
[1:02:06] the
[1:02:07] supreme
[1:02:07] court
[1:02:07] will
[1:02:07] not
[1:02:08] intervene
[1:02:08] that's
[1:02:09] how
[1:02:09] they
[1:02:09] resolved
[1:02:10] the
[1:02:10] petition
[1:02:10] before
[1:02:10] the
[1:02:11] supreme
[1:02:11] court
[1:02:11] so
[1:02:11] it's
[1:02:12] resolved
[1:02:12] already
[1:02:12] it was
[1:02:13] also
[1:02:14] denied
[1:02:14] based
[1:02:15] on
[1:02:15] the
[1:02:16] lack
[1:02:16] of
[1:02:16] standing
[1:02:17] if
[1:02:17] i'm
[1:02:17] not
[1:02:18] mistaken
[1:02:18] lack
[1:02:19] of
[1:02:19] legal
[1:02:20] standing
[1:02:21] of
[1:02:21] the
[1:02:22] petitioner
[1:02:23] and
[1:02:23] in
[1:02:24] addition
[1:02:24] to
[1:02:24] that
[1:02:24] ma'am
[1:02:25] in
[1:02:25] addition
[1:02:25] to
[1:02:26] that
[1:02:26] it's
[1:02:26] not
[1:02:26] even
[1:02:27] the
[1:02:27] house
[1:02:27] of
[1:02:28] representative
[1:02:28] recognizing
[1:02:29] the
[1:02:30] election
[1:02:30] of
[1:02:31] senator
[1:02:32] as
[1:02:33] speaker
[1:02:33] potemp
[1:02:34] or
[1:02:35] other
[1:02:35] legal
[1:02:35] luminaries
[1:02:36] members
[1:02:37] of the
[1:02:37] supreme
[1:02:38] court
[1:02:38] academe
[1:02:39] and
[1:02:39] all
[1:02:39] other
[1:02:40] sectors
[1:02:41] in our
[1:02:42] society
[1:02:42] but
[1:02:43] the
[1:02:43] senate
[1:02:43] itself
[1:02:44] recognizes
[1:02:47] the
[1:02:48] leadership
[1:02:48] of
[1:02:48] acting
[1:02:49] senate
[1:02:50] president
[1:02:50] Gatchalian
[1:02:51] because
[1:02:52] they
[1:02:52] issued
[1:02:53] notices
[1:02:55] and
[1:02:56] the
[1:02:57] staff
[1:02:57] in
[1:02:58] Senado
[1:02:58] are
[1:03:00] in
[1:03:01] hearings
[1:03:02] under
[1:03:04] the
[1:03:04] directive
[1:03:04] of
[1:03:05] the
[1:03:06] acting
[1:03:06] senate
[1:03:06] president
[1:03:07] with
[1:03:08] the
[1:03:08] newly
[1:03:09] elected
[1:03:10] secretary
[1:03:10] general
[1:03:11] and
[1:03:11] sergeant
[1:03:12] at
[1:03:12] arms
[1:03:12] so
[1:03:12] it's
[1:03:13] not
[1:03:13] even
[1:03:14] us
[1:03:14] recognizing
[1:03:15] senator
[1:03:16] wing
[1:03:16] Gatchalian
[1:03:17] but
[1:03:17] the
[1:03:17] institution
[1:03:18] itself
[1:03:19] there's
[1:03:19] already
[1:03:19] that
[1:03:19] recognition
[1:03:20] of
[1:03:25] course
[1:03:25] acting
[1:03:26] SP
[1:03:27] has
[1:03:27] been
[1:03:27] elected
[1:03:27] as
[1:03:28] senate
[1:03:29] president
[1:03:29] pro
[1:03:29] tempore
[1:03:30] and
[1:03:31] because
[1:03:31] of
[1:03:31] the
[1:03:32] prior
[1:03:32] declaration
[1:03:33] of
[1:03:33] vacancy
[1:03:33] of
[1:03:34] all
[1:03:34] positions
[1:03:34] including
[1:03:35] the
[1:03:35] position
[1:03:36] of
[1:03:36] the
[1:03:36] senate
[1:03:36] president
[1:03:37] automatic
[1:03:37] as
[1:03:39] senate
[1:03:39] president
[1:03:39] pro
[1:03:40] tempore
[1:03:40] he
[1:03:40] is
[1:03:41] the
[1:03:41] acting
[1:03:41] senate
[1:03:42] president
[1:03:42] salamat
[1:03:49] eden
[1:03:49] our
[1:03:50] next
[1:03:50] question
[1:03:51] will
[1:03:52] come
[1:03:52] from
[1:03:52] Jonathan
[1:03:54] Andalop
[1:03:54] GMA7
[1:03:55] good
[1:03:57] morning
[1:03:58] po
[1:03:58] andito po
[1:03:58] sa
[1:03:59] gilid
[1:03:59] kung
[1:04:00] sabi
[1:04:01] ni
[1:04:01] senator
[1:04:01] Laxon
[1:04:02] only
[1:04:03] the
[1:04:03] prosecution
[1:04:03] and
[1:04:04] the
[1:04:04] defense
[1:04:04] can
[1:04:05] make
[1:04:05] a
[1:04:05] motion
[1:04:05] to
[1:04:06] reduce
[1:04:07] the
[1:04:07] threshold
[1:04:08] of
[1:04:09] 16
[1:04:09] votes
[1:04:09] to
[1:04:09] convict
[1:04:10] an
[1:04:10] impeachable
[1:04:10] officer
[1:04:11] in this
[1:04:11] case
[1:04:11] vice
[1:04:12] president
[1:04:12] Sara
[1:04:12] Duterte
[1:04:13] does
[1:04:13] the
[1:04:14] house
[1:04:14] prosecution
[1:04:15] team
[1:04:15] intend
[1:04:16] to
[1:04:17] make
[1:04:17] such
[1:04:17] motion
[1:04:18] to
[1:04:18] avoid
[1:04:19] the
[1:04:19] threshold
[1:04:19] of
[1:04:21] 16
[1:04:21] votes
[1:04:21] to
[1:04:22] convict
[1:04:22] we
[1:04:23] have
[1:04:23] not
[1:04:23] actually
[1:04:24] discussed
[1:04:25] about
[1:04:25] that
[1:04:25] as
[1:04:26] being
[1:04:27] a
[1:04:27] team
[1:04:27] but
[1:04:28] I
[1:04:28] have
[1:04:28] expressed
[1:04:29] my
[1:04:29] position
[1:04:29] already
[1:04:30] that
[1:04:31] concerning
[1:04:32] the
[1:04:32] threshold
[1:04:33] for the
[1:04:33] purpose
[1:04:33] of
[1:04:34] conviction
[1:04:34] it
[1:04:35] is
[1:04:35] important
[1:04:36] to
[1:04:36] realize
[1:04:37] that
[1:04:38] the
[1:04:38] constitution
[1:04:38] and
[1:04:39] the
[1:04:39] laws
[1:04:39] are
[1:04:40] evolving
[1:04:41] why
[1:04:43] do
[1:04:43] I
[1:04:43] say
[1:04:43] that
[1:04:44] because
[1:04:44] the
[1:04:45] constitution
[1:04:45] should
[1:04:46] be
[1:04:46] responding
[1:04:47] to
[1:04:47] the
[1:04:47] demands
[1:04:48] of
[1:04:48] time
[1:04:48] just
[1:04:49] like
[1:04:49] any
[1:04:49] other
[1:04:49] law
[1:04:50] and
[1:04:51] very
[1:04:52] enlightening
[1:04:53] this
[1:04:53] change
[1:04:55] of
[1:04:55] leadership
[1:04:55] in
[1:04:56] Senado
[1:04:56] because
[1:04:57] it
[1:04:58] invited
[1:04:58] our
[1:04:59] attention
[1:04:59] to
[1:04:59] look
[1:04:59] into
[1:05:00] the
[1:05:00] doctrine
[1:05:00] behind
[1:05:01] Avellino
[1:05:02] versus
[1:05:02] Cuenco
[1:05:03] in
[1:05:04] several
[1:05:05] occasions
[1:05:05] the
[1:05:06] Senate
[1:05:07] and
[1:05:08] succeeding
[1:05:09] Supreme
[1:05:10] Court
[1:05:11] decisions
[1:05:11] along
[1:05:12] the
[1:05:12] same
[1:05:12] line
[1:05:13] so
[1:05:14] let
[1:05:16] us
[1:05:16] anchor
[1:05:16] also
[1:05:17] our
[1:05:17] position
[1:05:18] on
[1:05:18] the
[1:05:19] mandate
[1:05:19] of
[1:05:19] the
[1:05:19] Constitution
[1:05:20] why
[1:05:21] we
[1:05:21] have
[1:05:21] senators
[1:05:22] primarily
[1:05:23] the
[1:05:24] purpose
[1:05:24] is
[1:05:25] to
[1:05:25] represent
[1:05:26] the
[1:05:26] interest
[1:05:27] of
[1:05:27] the
[1:05:27] Filipino
[1:05:28] people
[1:05:28] if
[1:05:29] our
[1:05:29] senators
[1:05:30] are
[1:05:30] in
[1:05:30] hospital
[1:05:31] or abroad
[1:05:35] this is what
[1:05:36] called
[1:05:37] Avellino
[1:05:38] versus
[1:05:39] Cuenco
[1:05:39] beyond
[1:05:40] the
[1:05:41] coercive
[1:05:41] power
[1:05:42] of the
[1:05:42] Senate
[1:05:42] and
[1:05:43] having
[1:05:44] said
[1:05:44] so
[1:05:45] plus
[1:05:46] how are we
[1:05:50] going to
[1:05:51] consider
[1:05:51] them
[1:05:51] for the
[1:05:52] purpose
[1:05:52] of
[1:05:53] determining
[1:05:54] the
[1:05:54] threshold
[1:05:55] or the
[1:05:56] required
[1:05:56] number
[1:05:56] of
[1:05:56] votes
[1:05:57] so
[1:05:57] personal
[1:05:58] opinion
[1:05:58] I
[1:06:00] believe
[1:06:01] that
[1:06:01] the
[1:06:01] doctrine
[1:06:01] in
[1:06:02] Avellino
[1:06:02] should
[1:06:03] be
[1:06:03] applied
[1:06:03] also
[1:06:04] in
[1:06:04] determining
[1:06:05] the
[1:06:05] number
[1:06:06] of
[1:06:06] votes
[1:06:06] required
[1:06:06] for
[1:06:07] the
[1:06:07] purpose
[1:06:07] of
[1:06:07] conviction
[1:06:08] that
[1:06:08] is
[1:06:09] my
[1:06:09] personal
[1:06:09] opinion
[1:06:10] with
[1:06:17] the
[1:06:17] current
[1:06:17] situation
[1:06:18] yes
[1:06:18] the
[1:06:20] same
[1:06:20] way
[1:06:20] that
[1:06:20] it
[1:06:21] was
[1:06:21] reduced
[1:06:21] in
[1:06:22] the
[1:06:22] election
[1:06:23] of
[1:06:23] Senate
[1:06:25] President
[1:06:25] pro
[1:06:26] tempore
[1:06:26] and
[1:06:27] the
[1:06:27] rest
[1:06:27] of
[1:06:28] the
[1:06:28] chairmen
[1:06:28] chairwomen
[1:06:30] of
[1:06:30] the
[1:06:30] different
[1:06:32] committees
[1:06:32] of
[1:06:32] the
[1:06:33] Senate
[1:06:33] this
[1:06:35] is my
[1:06:40] opinion
[1:06:40] if
[1:06:41] the
[1:06:41] voting
[1:06:42] will
[1:06:42] happen
[1:06:42] now
[1:06:43] it
[1:06:44] should
[1:06:44] be
[1:06:44] 22
[1:06:45] as
[1:06:45] well
[1:06:45] if
[1:06:47] I
[1:06:47] may
[1:06:47] add
[1:06:47] again
[1:06:49] this
[1:06:49] is
[1:06:49] just
[1:06:51] an
[1:06:51] opinion
[1:06:52] all
[1:06:53] of
[1:06:53] us
[1:06:53] have
[1:06:53] different
[1:06:54] opinions
[1:06:55] regarding
[1:06:55] the
[1:06:55] matter
[1:06:55] but
[1:06:56] I
[1:06:56] think
[1:06:57] we
[1:06:58] want
[1:07:00] the
[1:07:00] Senate
[1:07:00] which
[1:07:01] is
[1:07:01] operational
[1:07:02] a
[1:07:02] functional
[1:07:03] Senate
[1:07:03] we
[1:07:04] cannot
[1:07:04] have
[1:07:05] a
[1:07:05] functional
[1:07:05] Senate
[1:07:06] if
[1:07:06] some
[1:07:06] of
[1:07:06] the
[1:07:06] members
[1:07:07] will
[1:07:08] not
[1:07:08] be
[1:07:08] accessible
[1:07:09] in
[1:07:11] terms
[1:07:11] of
[1:07:12] passing
[1:07:14] their
[1:07:14] judgment
[1:07:15] through
[1:07:15] a
[1:07:15] vote
[1:07:15] we're
[1:07:16] talking
[1:07:17] about
[1:07:17] impeachment
[1:07:17] trial
[1:07:18] where
[1:07:19] the
[1:07:20] sitting
[1:07:20] senator
[1:07:20] sitting
[1:07:21] judge
[1:07:23] senator
[1:07:23] judge
[1:07:24] presence
[1:07:26] would be
[1:07:26] indispensable
[1:07:27] in determining
[1:07:28] the
[1:07:29] determining
[1:07:33] the
[1:07:33] judgment
[1:07:34] by which
[1:07:35] one
[1:07:35] would
[1:07:35] have
[1:07:35] to
[1:07:35] arrive
[1:07:36] based
[1:07:37] on
[1:07:37] the
[1:07:37] evidence
[1:07:37] presented
[1:07:38] so
[1:07:39] I
[1:07:40] think
[1:07:40] kailangan
[1:07:41] natin
[1:07:41] yung
[1:07:42] approach
[1:07:43] na yun
[1:07:43] to
[1:07:43] be
[1:07:44] also
[1:07:44] be
[1:07:44] practical
[1:07:44] in
[1:07:45] order
[1:07:46] to
[1:07:46] establish
[1:07:47] our
[1:07:47] belief
[1:07:49] that
[1:07:49] the
[1:07:49] Senate
[1:07:50] is
[1:07:50] not
[1:07:51] just
[1:07:51] an
[1:07:51] institution
[1:07:52] sitting
[1:07:52] there
[1:07:52] to
[1:07:53] hear
[1:07:54] and
[1:07:54] to
[1:07:54] try
[1:07:54] and
[1:07:55] decide
[1:07:55] but
[1:07:56] a
[1:07:56] functional
[1:07:56] Senate
[1:07:57] where
[1:07:57] active
[1:07:58] members
[1:07:58] presence
[1:07:59] are
[1:08:00] secured
[1:08:01] a part
[1:08:03] of
[1:08:03] the
[1:08:03] deliberation
[1:08:04] can
[1:08:05] actually
[1:08:05] arrive
[1:08:05] into
[1:08:06] a
[1:08:06] sound
[1:08:06] judgment
[1:08:07] because
[1:08:08] of
[1:08:08] their
[1:08:08] actual
[1:08:08] presence
[1:08:09] by
[1:08:10] which
[1:08:10] these
[1:08:10] are
[1:08:11] the
[1:08:11] basis
[1:08:11] for
[1:08:11] them
[1:08:12] to
[1:08:12] pass
[1:08:12] on
[1:08:12] their
[1:08:13] judgment
[1:08:13] other
[1:08:13] to
[1:08:13] acquit
[1:08:14] or
[1:08:14] to
[1:08:14] convict
[1:08:15] do
[1:08:16] you
[1:08:18] consider
[1:08:19] Senator
[1:08:20] Jing
[1:08:20] Goy
[1:08:20] as
[1:08:21] suspended
[1:08:21] already
[1:08:22] because
[1:08:23] he
[1:08:23] arrested
[1:08:24] and
[1:08:25] is
[1:08:25] in
[1:08:25] the
[1:08:25] Senate
[1:08:26] ?
[1:08:27] Well,
[1:08:27] under
[1:08:27] the
[1:08:27] Plunder
[1:08:28] Law
[1:08:28] and
[1:08:29] the
[1:08:29] Anti-Graph
[1:08:31] and
[1:08:31] Corrupt
[1:08:31] Practices
[1:08:32] Act
[1:08:32] when
[1:08:33] the
[1:08:34] public
[1:08:35] officials
[1:08:35] are
[1:08:35] charged
[1:08:36] as
[1:08:36] such
[1:08:37] they
[1:08:37] are
[1:08:37] suspended
[1:08:38] from
[1:08:39] becoming
[1:08:39] a
[1:08:40] member
[1:08:40] of
[1:08:40] the
[1:08:40] Senate
[1:08:41] so
[1:08:41] if
[1:08:42] you're
[1:08:42] suspended
[1:08:42] how
[1:08:43] can
[1:08:44] you
[1:08:44] attend
[1:08:45] are
[1:08:46] you
[1:08:47] still
[1:08:47] a
[1:08:47] senator
[1:08:47] on
[1:08:48] that
[1:08:48] particular
[1:08:48] occasion
[1:08:49] if
[1:08:49] you're
[1:08:50] suspended
[1:08:50] from
[1:08:50] your
[1:08:51] official
[1:08:51] duty
[1:08:51] I
[1:08:53] think
[1:08:53] the
[1:08:53] answer
[1:08:53] is
[1:08:53] clear
[1:08:54] no
[1:08:54] and
[1:08:55] to
[1:08:55] add
[1:08:55] to
[1:08:56] what
[1:08:56] Kong
[1:08:56] Cia
[1:08:56] said
[1:08:58] no
[1:08:58] we have
[1:08:59] mandato
[1:09:00] in
[1:09:00] the
[1:09:00] Constitution
[1:09:01] and
[1:09:02] that
[1:09:03] is
[1:09:03] to
[1:09:03] trial
[1:09:04] forth
[1:09:05] with
[1:09:05] no
[1:09:05] and
[1:09:07] if
[1:09:07] we
[1:09:07] hold
[1:09:08] the
[1:09:08] contra
[1:09:08] review
[1:09:09] it
[1:09:10] means
[1:09:11] that
[1:09:11] the
[1:09:11] constitutional
[1:09:12] mandate
[1:09:13] will
[1:09:13] be
[1:09:13] hostage
[1:09:14] by
[1:09:15] the
[1:09:15] different
[1:09:16] situations
[1:09:17] of
[1:09:18] some
[1:09:18] senators
[1:09:19] if
[1:09:20] you're
[1:09:20] going to
[1:09:21] circulate
[1:09:24] on social
[1:09:24] media
[1:09:25] will
[1:09:25] happen
[1:09:25] 8 or
[1:09:27] 9
[1:09:28] will
[1:09:29] be
[1:09:29] having
[1:09:31] their
[1:09:31] cases
[1:09:31] in
[1:09:31] court
[1:09:32] must
[1:09:33] suspend
[1:09:34] as
[1:09:34] provided
[1:09:34] in
[1:09:35] the
[1:09:36] Plunder
[1:09:36] Law
[1:09:37] and
[1:09:37] the
[1:09:38] Anti-Graph
[1:09:38] and
[1:09:38] Corrupt
[1:09:39] Practices
[1:09:39] Act
[1:09:40] the
[1:09:40] required
[1:09:41] threshold
[1:09:42] is
[1:09:42] 16
[1:09:42] so
[1:09:43] that
[1:09:44] will
[1:09:44] mean
[1:09:44] that
[1:09:44] it
[1:09:45] will
[1:09:45] paralyze
[1:09:45] the
[1:09:46] accountability
[1:09:46] mechanism
[1:09:47] and
[1:09:48] we
[1:09:50] know
[1:09:50] of
[1:09:50] course
[1:09:50] that
[1:09:50] the
[1:09:50] constitution
[1:09:51] is
[1:09:51] paramount
[1:09:52] it
[1:09:53] must
[1:09:53] not
[1:09:54] be
[1:09:54] conditioned
[1:09:55] to
[1:09:55] the
[1:09:55] situation
[1:09:56] of
[1:09:56] our
[1:09:56] senators
[1:09:57] this
[1:09:58] impeachment
[1:09:58] trial
[1:09:58] must
[1:09:59] proceed
[1:09:59] the
[1:10:00] decision
[1:10:01] must
[1:10:01] be
[1:10:01] rendered
[1:10:02] no
[1:10:03] and
[1:10:03] the
[1:10:03] threshold
[1:10:04] must
[1:10:04] be
[1:10:04] fixed
[1:10:05] depending
[1:10:06] on
[1:10:06] the
[1:10:07] current
[1:10:07] situation
[1:10:08] of
[1:10:08] our
[1:10:09] senate
[1:10:09] Do you agree
[1:10:32] ma'am
[1:10:33] doon sa
[1:10:33] kanyang
[1:10:33] suggestion
[1:10:34] Well my
[1:10:35] perspective
[1:10:36] is from
[1:10:37] the point
[1:10:38] of view
[1:10:38] that
[1:10:39] it is
[1:10:40] the
[1:10:40] senate
[1:10:40] which
[1:10:41] has
[1:10:41] jurisdiction
[1:10:42] we
[1:10:43] cannot
[1:10:43] speak
[1:10:44] for
[1:10:44] we
[1:10:45] cannot
[1:10:45] speak
[1:10:45] for
[1:10:46] the
[1:10:46] sandigan
[1:10:47] we
[1:10:47] cannot
[1:10:47] speak
[1:10:48] for
[1:10:48] the
[1:10:48] ombudsman
[1:10:49] no
[1:10:50] of
[1:10:51] course
[1:10:51] from
[1:10:51] the
[1:10:52] perspective
[1:10:52] of
[1:10:53] senate
[1:10:53] yan
[1:10:53] yung
[1:10:54] naghohold
[1:10:54] ng
[1:10:55] impeachment
[1:10:55] trial
[1:10:56] at
[1:10:56] hindi
[1:10:57] naman
[1:10:57] nila
[1:10:57] pwede
[1:10:58] basta
[1:10:58] pang
[1:10:59] himasukan
[1:11:00] what
[1:11:00] will
[1:11:00] be
[1:11:00] the
[1:11:00] decision
[1:11:01] of
[1:11:01] the
[1:11:01] sandigan
[1:11:02] bayan
[1:11:02] I
[1:11:03] think
[1:11:03] it
[1:11:03] will
[1:11:03] be
[1:11:04] more
[1:11:04] appropriate
[1:11:05] to
[1:11:05] follow
[1:11:05] the
[1:11:05] doctrine
[1:11:06] of
[1:11:06] Avellino
[1:11:07] after
[1:11:08] all
[1:11:08] ibabalik
[1:11:09] mandato
[1:11:10] ng
[1:11:10] saligang
[1:11:11] batas
[1:11:11] dapat
[1:11:13] ang
[1:11:13] senador
[1:11:14] magrepresent
[1:11:15] ng
[1:11:15] interest
[1:11:15] ng
[1:11:15] sambayan
[1:11:16] ng
[1:11:16] Pilipino
[1:11:16] during
[1:11:17] that
[1:11:17] impeachment
[1:11:18] trial
[1:11:18] and
[1:11:19] if
[1:11:19] you
[1:11:19] are
[1:11:20] detained
[1:11:20] if
[1:11:21] you
[1:11:21] are
[1:11:21] in
[1:11:22] hiding
[1:11:22] the
[1:11:23] question
[1:11:24] is
[1:11:24] are
[1:11:25] you
[1:11:25] representing
[1:11:26] the
[1:11:26] interest
[1:11:26] of
[1:11:27] the
[1:11:27] Filipino
[1:11:27] when
[1:11:28] in
[1:11:28] fact
[1:11:28] you
[1:11:29] cannot
[1:11:29] attend
[1:11:29] because
[1:11:30] of
[1:11:30] your
[1:11:30] personal
[1:11:31] dilemma
[1:11:32] no
[1:11:32] so
[1:11:33] we
[1:11:34] cannot
[1:11:35] subordinate
[1:11:36] the
[1:11:36] constitutional
[1:11:37] mandate
[1:11:38] to
[1:11:38] the
[1:11:39] situation
[1:11:39] in
[1:11:39] the
[1:11:39] Senate
[1:11:40] Constitution
[1:11:41] is
[1:11:41] paramount
[1:11:42] therefore
[1:11:43] it
[1:11:44] must
[1:11:44] be
[1:11:44] interpreted
[1:11:45] in
[1:11:45] a
[1:11:45] way
[1:11:46] to
[1:11:46] give
[1:11:47] light
[1:11:47] to
[1:11:47] the
[1:11:47] implementation
[1:11:48] of
[1:11:49] the
[1:11:49] constitutional
[1:11:49] mandate
[1:11:50] last
[1:11:51] question
[1:11:51] doon
[1:11:52] po
[1:11:52] sa
[1:11:52] list
[1:11:52] of
[1:11:53] witnesses
[1:11:53] ninyo
[1:11:53] more
[1:11:53] than
[1:11:54] 30
[1:11:54] ilan
[1:11:54] po
[1:11:55] dun
[1:11:55] yung
[1:11:55] high
[1:11:56] profile
[1:11:57] witnesses
[1:11:57] na
[1:11:58] masasabi
[1:11:59] I
[1:12:01] cannot
[1:12:01] divulge
[1:12:02] yet
[1:12:02] ilang
[1:12:03] oras
[1:12:03] na
[1:12:03] lang
[1:12:03] naman
[1:12:04] at
[1:12:04] ma-file
[1:12:05] na
[1:12:05] yung
[1:12:05] pre-trial
[1:12:06] brief
[1:12:07] pakihintay
[1:12:07] na
[1:12:07] po
[1:12:08] because
[1:12:08] our
[1:12:08] deadline
[1:12:09] is
[1:12:09] today
[1:12:09] thank
[1:12:10] Jonathan
[1:12:17] from
[1:12:18] Rappler
[1:12:19] Dwight
[1:12:20] DeLeon
[1:12:20] is now
[1:12:21] recognized
[1:12:21] hello
[1:12:22] po
[1:12:22] good
[1:12:22] afternoon
[1:12:23] question
[1:12:24] follow up
[1:12:25] po
[1:12:25] kaya
[1:12:25] congresswoman
[1:12:25] Jinky
[1:12:26] because
[1:12:26] again
[1:12:27] this
[1:12:27] is
[1:12:27] your
[1:12:27] legal
[1:12:28] opinion
[1:12:28] so
[1:12:29] with
[1:12:29] 22
[1:12:30] senators
[1:12:32] who
[1:12:32] are
[1:12:33] functioning
[1:12:34] sa
[1:12:34] scenario
[1:12:35] na yun
[1:12:35] based
[1:12:35] on
[1:12:36] your
[1:12:36] legal
[1:12:36] opinion
[1:12:36] does
[1:12:36] that
[1:12:37] mean
[1:12:37] for
[1:12:37] you
[1:12:38] the
[1:12:38] conviction
[1:12:39] threshold
[1:12:39] should
[1:12:40] be
[1:12:40] reduced
[1:12:40] to
[1:12:41] 15
[1:12:41] given
[1:12:42] that
[1:12:43] I
[1:12:43] don't
[1:12:43] have
[1:12:43] to
[1:12:44] compute
[1:12:46] two
[1:12:46] thirds
[1:12:47] of
[1:12:47] 22
[1:12:47] so
[1:12:48] that's
[1:12:48] 15
[1:12:49] yes
[1:12:50] congresswoman
[1:12:51] Jinky
[1:12:52] since
[1:12:52] this
[1:12:52] is also
[1:12:52] in the
[1:12:53] realm
[1:12:53] of
[1:12:53] possibilities
[1:12:54] given
[1:12:54] that
[1:12:54] it's
[1:12:55] in
[1:12:55] 8
[1:12:55] if
[1:12:57] one
[1:12:57] more
[1:12:58] senator
[1:12:59] is
[1:13:00] arrested
[1:13:00] or
[1:13:01] is
[1:13:02] subjected
[1:13:02] to
[1:13:02] an
[1:13:02] arrest
[1:13:03] warrant
[1:13:03] the
[1:13:04] count
[1:13:04] would
[1:13:04] be
[1:13:04] reduced
[1:13:05] to
[1:13:05] 21
[1:13:05] so
[1:13:06] in
[1:13:06] your
[1:13:07] legal
[1:13:07] opinion
[1:13:07] if
[1:13:08] that
[1:13:08] happens
[1:13:08] could
[1:13:09] the
[1:13:10] conviction
[1:13:11] threshold
[1:13:12] be
[1:13:12] further
[1:13:12] reduced
[1:13:12] to
[1:13:13] 14
[1:13:13] because
[1:13:14] two
[1:13:14] thirds
[1:13:14] of
[1:13:15] 21
[1:13:15] is
[1:13:16] 14
[1:13:16] what
[1:13:18] what
[1:13:18] my
[1:13:18] position
[1:13:19] is
[1:13:19] to
[1:13:19] apply
[1:13:20] the
[1:13:20] doctrine
[1:13:20] in
[1:13:20] Avellino
[1:13:21] so
[1:13:22] our
[1:13:22] test
[1:13:22] are they
[1:13:23] still
[1:13:24] within
[1:13:24] the
[1:13:24] coercive
[1:13:25] power
[1:13:26] of
[1:13:26] the
[1:13:26] Senate
[1:13:26] if
[1:13:27] the
[1:13:27] answer
[1:13:27] is
[1:13:27] no
[1:13:28] then
[1:13:28] the
[1:13:29] number
[1:13:29] should
[1:13:29] be
[1:13:29] reduced
[1:13:30] to
[1:13:30] 14
[1:13:31] to
[1:13:31] 14
[1:13:31] 14
[1:13:33] for
[1:13:33] the
[1:13:33] threshold
[1:13:33] 21
[1:13:35] for
[1:13:35] the
[1:13:35] baseline
[1:13:36] and
[1:13:37] since
[1:13:37] Congresswoman
[1:13:39] Bell
[1:13:40] is that
[1:13:40] also
[1:13:40] an
[1:13:41] opinion
[1:13:41] that
[1:13:41] you
[1:13:42] subscribe
[1:13:42] to
[1:13:42] because
[1:13:42] I think
[1:13:44] Kong
[1:13:44] Z
[1:13:44] that
[1:13:44] it's not yet
[1:13:48] and
[1:13:48] to
[1:13:48] talk
[1:13:49] collectively
[1:13:49] so
[1:13:50] Congresswoman
[1:13:50] Bell
[1:13:51] is that
[1:13:51] also
[1:13:52] an
[1:13:52] opinion
[1:13:52] that
[1:13:52] you
[1:13:52] subscribe
[1:13:53] to
[1:13:53] yes
[1:13:54] it is
[1:13:54] an
[1:13:54] opinion
[1:13:55] I
[1:13:55] share
[1:13:55] with
[1:13:56] Chair
[1:13:56] Jinky
[1:13:57] and
[1:13:58] do I
[1:13:58] it's also
[1:13:59] the
[1:13:59] opinion
[1:13:59] I
[1:14:00] share
[1:14:00] with
[1:14:00] Kong
[1:14:00] Jinky
[1:14:01] again
[1:14:03] we need
[1:14:05] we need
[1:14:05] a
[1:14:05] Senate
[1:14:06] that
[1:14:06] is
[1:14:06] functioning
[1:14:07] and
[1:14:08] for
[1:14:08] all
[1:14:09] of
[1:14:09] the
[1:14:09] procedures
[1:14:11] that
[1:14:11] the
[1:14:12] Senate
[1:14:12] will
[1:14:12] be
[1:14:12] doing
[1:14:13] we
[1:14:13] need
[1:14:13] senators
[1:14:14] who
[1:14:15] are
[1:14:15] able
[1:14:16] to
[1:14:17] do
[1:14:17] their
[1:14:17] job
[1:14:18] and
[1:14:18] if
[1:14:19] one
[1:14:19] is
[1:14:19] hiding
[1:14:20] purposefully
[1:14:21] hiding
[1:14:23] from
[1:14:23] not only
[1:14:26] his job
[1:14:26] but from
[1:14:27] the
[1:14:27] people
[1:14:27] then
[1:14:28] he
[1:14:28] shouldn't
[1:14:29] be
[1:14:29] included
[1:14:29] in the
[1:14:31] number
[1:14:33] when we
[1:14:34] count
[1:14:34] whether
[1:14:36] this is
[1:14:36] for
[1:14:37] quorum
[1:14:37] purposes
[1:14:38] or
[1:14:38] whether
[1:14:38] this is
[1:14:39] for
[1:14:39] the
[1:14:41] determination
[1:14:41] of
[1:14:42] conviction
[1:14:43] so
[1:14:44] I
[1:14:44] share
[1:14:45] the
[1:14:45] same
[1:14:45] view
[1:14:45] as
[1:14:46] Chair
[1:14:46] woman
[1:14:46] Jinky
[1:14:47] also
[1:14:48] Dwight
[1:14:48] just
[1:14:49] to
[1:14:49] also
[1:14:49] to
[1:14:49] add
[1:14:50] to
[1:14:50] that
[1:14:50] we
[1:14:51] don't
[1:14:51] award
[1:14:52] yung
[1:14:52] sinabi
[1:14:53] ni
[1:14:53] ni
[1:14:54] congresswoman
[1:14:55] Jinky
[1:14:55] yung
[1:14:56] doctrine
[1:14:57] ng
[1:14:57] Avellino
[1:14:57] it
[1:14:58] should
[1:14:58] not
[1:14:58] be
[1:14:59] applied
[1:14:59] kasi
[1:14:59] ito
[1:15:00] what
[1:15:00] we
[1:15:00] want
[1:15:00] is
[1:15:01] a
[1:15:01] functional
[1:15:01] senate
[1:15:01] and
[1:15:02] functional
[1:15:02] senate
[1:15:02] meaning
[1:15:03] the
[1:15:04] active
[1:15:04] members
[1:15:04] deliberating
[1:15:06] in a
[1:15:06] very
[1:15:07] important
[1:15:07] subject
[1:15:07] matter
[1:15:08] it
[1:15:08] should
[1:15:09] not
[1:15:09] also
[1:15:09] be
[1:15:10] looked at
[1:15:10] in the
[1:15:10] lens
[1:15:11] of
[1:15:11] impeachment
[1:15:11] trial
[1:15:11] but
[1:15:12] there
[1:15:12] are
[1:15:12] also
[1:15:12] other
[1:15:13] cases
[1:15:14] concurrence
[1:15:14] of
[1:15:14] treaties
[1:15:15] the
[1:15:16] back
[1:15:16] concurrence
[1:15:16] of
[1:15:16] treaties
[1:15:17] declaration
[1:15:17] of
[1:15:18] war
[1:15:18] because
[1:15:18] it
[1:15:18] has
[1:15:19] to
[1:15:19] have
[1:15:19] a
[1:15:19] concurrence
[1:15:20] of
[1:15:20] the
[1:15:20] of
[1:15:21] the
[1:15:21] Senate
[1:15:21] so
[1:15:22] if
[1:15:22] you
[1:15:22] don't
[1:15:22] have
[1:15:23] that
[1:15:23] if
[1:15:24] you
[1:15:24] don't
[1:15:24] apply
[1:15:24] the
[1:15:25] the
[1:15:31] to
[1:15:31] require
[1:15:32] members
[1:15:33] who
[1:15:34] are
[1:15:34] behind
[1:15:35] bars
[1:15:35] or
[1:15:35] whatever
[1:15:36] because
[1:15:36] of
[1:15:36] their
[1:15:37] incapacity
[1:15:38] by means
[1:15:39] of
[1:15:39] presence
[1:15:40] they
[1:15:40] cannot
[1:15:41] vote
[1:15:41] so
[1:15:42] what
[1:15:42] would
[1:15:43] happen
[1:15:43] to
[1:15:43] other
[1:15:43] issues
[1:15:45] not
[1:15:46] only
[1:15:46] impeachment
[1:15:47] trial
[1:15:47] but
[1:15:47] concurrence
[1:15:49] of
[1:15:49] the
[1:15:49] treaties
[1:15:49] and
[1:15:51] then
[1:15:52] declaration
[1:15:52] of
[1:15:53] war
[1:15:53] which
[1:15:53] requires
[1:15:54] the
[1:15:54] Senate
[1:15:55] for
[1:15:56] concurrence
[1:15:56] so
[1:15:57] I
[1:15:57] think
[1:15:57] it
[1:15:57] is
[1:15:57] not
[1:15:58] only
[1:15:58] legal
[1:15:59] but
[1:15:59] it
[1:16:00] should
[1:16:00] be
[1:16:00] looked
[1:16:01] at
[1:16:01] in
[1:16:01] its
[1:16:01] practical
[1:16:02] sense
[1:16:02] because
[1:16:03] ultimately
[1:16:04] what
[1:16:04] we
[1:16:04] want
[1:16:05] the
[1:16:05] Constitution
[1:16:05] says
[1:16:05] I
[1:16:08] talked
[1:16:08] to
[1:16:08] a
[1:16:09] constitutional
[1:16:09] lawyer
[1:16:10] last
[1:16:10] week
[1:16:10] and he
[1:16:12] agrees
[1:16:12] with
[1:16:12] his
[1:16:12] emerging
[1:16:13] view
[1:16:13] about
[1:16:13] reconsidering
[1:16:15] the
[1:16:15] conviction
[1:16:16] threshold
[1:16:16] but he
[1:16:17] said
[1:16:17] that
[1:16:17] it
[1:16:18] should
[1:16:18] be
[1:16:18] accommodated
[1:16:19] when
[1:16:19] we
[1:16:20] reach
[1:16:20] an
[1:16:20] extraordinary
[1:16:21] point
[1:16:21] which
[1:16:22] we
[1:16:22] have
[1:16:22] not
[1:16:22] yet
[1:16:23] reached
[1:16:23] do
[1:16:23] you
[1:16:23] think
[1:16:24] that
[1:16:24] if
[1:16:25] one
[1:16:25] more
[1:16:25] senator
[1:16:26] is
[1:16:26] arrested
[1:16:26] that
[1:16:27] is
[1:16:27] an
[1:16:27] extraordinary
[1:16:28] situation
[1:16:29] an
[1:16:29] unprecedented
[1:16:30] unprecedented
[1:16:31] situation
[1:16:31] that
[1:16:32] warrants
[1:16:33] the
[1:16:33] impeachment
[1:16:34] court
[1:16:34] to
[1:16:35] look
[1:16:35] to
[1:16:36] consider
[1:16:36] seriously
[1:16:37] whether
[1:16:38] we
[1:16:38] should
[1:16:38] reduce
[1:16:39] the
[1:16:39] conviction
[1:16:39] threshold
[1:16:40] yes
[1:16:41] as a
[1:16:42] matter
[1:16:42] of
[1:16:42] fact
[1:16:42] even
[1:16:43] prior
[1:16:44] to
[1:16:44] the
[1:16:44] arrest
[1:16:45] of
[1:16:45] whoever
[1:16:46] will
[1:16:46] be
[1:16:46] the
[1:16:46] third
[1:16:47] I
[1:16:47] believe
[1:16:48] that
[1:16:48] it
[1:16:48] should
[1:16:48] be
[1:16:49] interpreted
[1:16:50] already
[1:16:51] in a
[1:16:51] way
[1:16:52] that
[1:16:52] we
[1:16:52] will
[1:16:52] be
[1:16:52] able
[1:16:53] to
[1:16:53] address
[1:16:53] the
[1:16:53] present
[1:16:54] situation
[1:16:54] no
[1:16:55] I
[1:16:55] said
[1:16:56] earlier
[1:16:56] that
[1:16:57] the
[1:16:57] constitution
[1:16:58] is
[1:16:58] evolving
[1:16:58] the
[1:17:00] laws
[1:17:00] are
[1:17:00] evolving
[1:17:01] the
[1:17:02] supreme
[1:17:02] court
[1:17:02] decisions
[1:17:03] are
[1:17:03] evolving
[1:17:04] and
[1:17:05] by
[1:17:05] evolving
[1:17:06] what
[1:17:06] I
[1:17:06] meant
[1:17:06] was
[1:17:07] hindi
[1:17:08] enough
[1:17:08] na
[1:17:08] meron
[1:17:09] tayong
[1:17:09] batas
[1:17:10] yung
[1:17:11] batas
[1:17:11] dapat
[1:17:12] tumutugon
[1:17:13] sa
[1:17:13] kasalukuyang
[1:17:14] sitwasyon
[1:17:15] it
[1:17:15] should
[1:17:16] be
[1:17:16] able
[1:17:16] to
[1:17:17] respond
[1:17:17] to
[1:17:18] the
[1:17:18] current
[1:17:18] demands
[1:17:19] of
[1:17:19] time
[1:17:19] another
[1:17:22] topic
[1:17:22] related
[1:17:23] to
[1:17:23] the
[1:17:23] pretrial
[1:17:24] proceedings
[1:17:24] we
[1:17:25] did
[1:17:25] not
[1:17:25] have
[1:17:25] a
[1:17:25] pretrial
[1:17:26] proceeding
[1:17:26] during
[1:17:26] the
[1:17:27] corona
[1:17:27] trial
[1:17:27] but
[1:17:28] we
[1:17:28] have
[1:17:28] a
[1:17:29] pretrial
[1:17:29] proceeding
[1:17:30] during
[1:17:30] the
[1:17:31] Estrada
[1:17:32] trial
[1:17:32] and
[1:17:32] news
[1:17:33] archives
[1:17:33] suggest
[1:17:34] or
[1:17:34] indicate
[1:17:34] that
[1:17:35] during
[1:17:36] the
[1:17:36] pretrial
[1:17:36] proceedings
[1:17:37] the
[1:17:37] prosecution
[1:17:38] and
[1:17:38] the
[1:17:38] defense
[1:17:39] agreed
[1:17:40] to
[1:17:40] finishing
[1:17:41] the
[1:17:42] entire
[1:17:43] trial
[1:17:43] or
[1:17:43] the
[1:17:43] trial
[1:17:43] proper
[1:17:44] within
[1:17:45] or
[1:17:45] by
[1:17:45] 34
[1:17:45] days
[1:17:46] it
[1:17:48] is
[1:17:48] not
[1:17:48] a
[1:17:48] separate
[1:17:48] discussion
[1:17:49] if
[1:17:49] nasunod
[1:17:49] po
[1:17:49] but
[1:17:50] is
[1:17:50] that
[1:17:50] something
[1:17:51] that
[1:17:51] the
[1:17:51] prosecution
[1:17:52] is
[1:17:52] eyeing
[1:17:52] to
[1:17:52] resolve
[1:17:53] during
[1:17:53] the
[1:17:54] pretrial
[1:17:54] proceedings
[1:17:54] if
[1:17:55] the
[1:17:55] trial
[1:17:57] proper
[1:17:57] part
[1:17:58] of
[1:17:58] the
[1:17:59] things
[1:17:59] to be
[1:18:00] talked
[1:18:00] about
[1:18:01] during
[1:18:01] pretrial
[1:18:01] conference
[1:18:02] is
[1:18:02] the
[1:18:03] schedule
[1:18:03] of
[1:18:04] trial
[1:18:04] dates
[1:18:05] and
[1:18:05] that
[1:18:06] includes
[1:18:07] of
[1:18:07] course
[1:18:08] the
[1:18:08] number
[1:18:08] of
[1:18:09] schedule
[1:18:10] that
[1:18:10] we
[1:18:10] will
[1:18:10] be
[1:18:11] needing
[1:18:11] for
[1:18:12] the
[1:18:12] purpose
[1:18:12] of
[1:18:12] presenting
[1:18:13] the
[1:18:13] prosecution
[1:18:14] evidence
[1:18:15] same
[1:18:15] is
[1:18:16] true
[1:18:16] with
[1:18:16] respect
[1:18:16] to
[1:18:16] the
[1:18:17] defense
[1:18:17] they
[1:18:18] ask
[1:18:18] how
[1:18:19] trial
[1:18:20] dates
[1:18:20] to
[1:18:21] conclude
[1:18:22] the
[1:18:23] presentation
[1:18:23] of
[1:18:23] their
[1:18:23] evidence
[1:18:24] so
[1:18:24] to
[1:18:24] your
[1:18:24] question
[1:18:25] yes
[1:18:26] the
[1:18:26] number
[1:18:26] of
[1:18:26] trial
[1:18:27] dates
[1:18:27] will
[1:18:27] be
[1:18:27] determined
[1:18:28] as well
[1:18:28] during
[1:18:29] the
[1:18:29] pretrial
[1:18:29] conference
[1:18:30] congressman
[1:18:31] jinky
[1:18:31] ballpark
[1:18:32] figure
[1:18:32] lang
[1:18:32] sa
[1:18:32] bahagi
[1:18:33] ng
[1:18:33] prosecution
[1:18:33] ilang
[1:18:34] buwan
[1:18:34] kaya
[1:18:34] to
[1:18:34] at
[1:18:34] least
[1:18:35] minimum
[1:18:35] isang
[1:18:36] buwan
[1:18:36] dalawang
[1:18:36] buwan
[1:18:36] tatlong
[1:18:37] buwan
[1:18:37] ang
[1:18:38] aking
[1:18:38] estimate
[1:18:39] is
[1:18:39] if
[1:18:39] we
[1:18:40] will
[1:18:40] be
[1:18:40] starting
[1:18:41] on
[1:18:41] july
[1:18:41] 6
[1:18:42] we
[1:18:42] will
[1:18:43] perhaps
[1:18:43] end
[1:18:44] by
[1:18:44] end
[1:18:45] of
[1:18:45] september
[1:18:46] 2026
[1:18:47] sige
[1:18:50] po
[1:18:50] yun
[1:18:51] lang
[1:18:51] po
[1:18:51] yung
[1:18:51] questions
[1:18:51] i
[1:18:52] checked
[1:18:52] the
[1:18:52] corona
[1:18:53] impeachment
[1:18:54] trial
[1:18:55] it
[1:18:55] started
[1:18:55] january
[1:18:56] 12
[1:18:56] to
[1:18:57] may
[1:18:57] 29
[1:18:57] so
[1:18:58] that
[1:18:58] is
[1:18:58] equivalent
[1:18:58] to
[1:18:59] four
[1:18:59] months
[1:18:59] so
[1:19:00] kung
[1:19:00] wala
[1:19:01] namang
[1:19:01] delay
[1:19:01] tuloy
[1:19:02] tuloy
[1:19:02] tingin
[1:19:03] ko
[1:19:03] kakayanin
[1:19:04] ito
[1:19:04] for
[1:19:04] three
[1:19:05] months
[1:19:05] sorry
[1:19:06] may
[1:19:06] follow-up
[1:19:06] question
[1:19:06] po
[1:19:07] sorry
[1:19:07] may
[1:19:07] another
[1:19:07] question
[1:19:08] po
[1:19:08] pala
[1:19:08] tungkol
[1:19:09] sa
[1:19:09] may
[1:19:10] ilalagay
[1:19:12] niyo
[1:19:12] po
[1:19:12] sa
[1:19:12] pre-trial
[1:19:12] brief
[1:19:13] kung
[1:19:13] ano
[1:19:13] yung
[1:19:14] order
[1:19:15] of
[1:19:15] the
[1:19:15] presentation
[1:19:16] of
[1:19:16] the
[1:19:16] article
[1:19:17] of
[1:19:17] impeachment
[1:19:17] at
[1:19:18] ano
[1:19:18] po
[1:19:18] yung
[1:19:18] mauna
[1:19:18] dun
[1:19:19] sa
[1:19:19] amat
[1:19:20] yes
[1:19:21] I
[1:19:21] think
[1:19:21] that's
[1:19:22] part
[1:19:22] also
[1:19:22] of
[1:19:23] the
[1:19:23] notice
[1:19:23] that
[1:19:23] we
[1:19:24] receive
[1:19:24] to
[1:19:24] determine
[1:19:25] the
[1:19:25] order
[1:19:26] of
[1:19:26] presentation
[1:19:27] of
[1:19:27] the
[1:19:27] articles
[1:19:28] of
[1:19:28] impeachment
[1:19:28] so
[1:19:29] mamaya
[1:19:30] nyo
[1:19:30] na rin
[1:19:30] lang
[1:19:31] malaman
[1:19:31] after
[1:19:31] the
[1:19:32] filing
[1:19:32] of
[1:19:32] the
[1:19:32] pre-trial
[1:19:33] brief
[1:19:33] and
[1:19:35] lastly
[1:19:35] po
[1:19:35] doon
[1:19:36] sa
[1:19:36] list
[1:19:37] of
[1:19:37] witnesses
[1:19:37] alin
[1:19:38] po
[1:19:39] doon
[1:19:39] or
[1:19:39] witnesses
[1:19:40] sa
[1:19:40] patungkol
[1:19:41] sa
[1:19:41] ang
[1:19:41] topic
[1:19:42] nage-expect
[1:19:43] ang
[1:19:43] prosecution
[1:19:44] ng
[1:19:44] matinding
[1:19:45] pushback
[1:19:45] from
[1:19:46] the
[1:19:46] Duterte
[1:19:47] camp
[1:19:47] kasi
[1:19:48] even
[1:19:48] during
[1:19:49] the
[1:19:49] pre-trial
[1:19:50] proceedings
[1:19:50] in the
[1:19:50] Estrada
[1:19:54] may
[1:19:54] mga
[1:19:55] sinagest
[1:19:55] yung
[1:19:56] prosecution
[1:19:56] at
[1:19:56] that
[1:19:56] time
[1:19:57] na
[1:19:57] isasubti
[1:19:57] ng
[1:19:58] mga
[1:19:58] witnesses
[1:19:58] na
[1:19:59] in-oppose
[1:20:00] significantly
[1:20:01] ng
[1:20:01] defense
[1:20:03] team
[1:20:03] ng
[1:20:04] Estrada
[1:20:04] camp
[1:20:04] at
[1:20:04] that
[1:20:04] time
[1:20:05] without
[1:20:05] specifically
[1:20:06] mentioning
[1:20:07] the
[1:20:08] witnesses
[1:20:09] and
[1:20:10] the
[1:20:10] exhibits
[1:20:10] to be
[1:20:11] presented
[1:20:11] but
[1:20:12] we
[1:20:12] anticipate
[1:20:12] that
[1:20:13] to
[1:20:13] happen
[1:20:13] in
[1:20:13] the
[1:20:14] article
[1:20:14] for
[1:20:15] unexplained
[1:20:15] wealth
[1:20:16] kasi
[1:20:16] naramdaman
[1:20:17] na
[1:20:17] namin
[1:20:18] yan
[1:20:18] during
[1:20:19] the
[1:20:19] justice
[1:20:19] committee
[1:20:20] proceeding
[1:20:20] so
[1:20:21] do
[1:20:21] you
[1:20:21] think
[1:20:21] po
[1:20:22] na
[1:20:22] i-oppose
[1:20:24] ng
[1:20:24] Duterte
[1:20:25] camp
[1:20:25] extremely
[1:20:26] yung
[1:20:27] inyong
[1:20:28] move
[1:20:28] to
[1:20:29] subpena
[1:20:29] bank
[1:20:30] records
[1:20:31] bank
[1:20:32] officials
[1:20:32] we
[1:20:33] anticipate
[1:20:33] that
[1:20:34] as
[1:20:34] a
[1:20:34] matter
[1:20:35] of
[1:20:35] fact
[1:20:35] na
[1:20:35] alala
[1:20:36] nyo
[1:20:36] nung
[1:20:36] proceeding
[1:20:37] before
[1:20:37] the
[1:20:37] justice
[1:20:37] committee
[1:20:38] they
[1:20:39] filed
[1:20:39] criminal
[1:20:40] case
[1:20:40] against
[1:20:41] us
[1:20:41] for
[1:20:41] violation
[1:20:42] of
[1:20:42] the
[1:20:43] alleged
[1:20:43] confidentiality
[1:20:45] in
[1:20:45] the
[1:20:46] Anti
[1:20:46] Money
[1:20:46] Laundering
[1:20:47] Act
[1:20:47] that
[1:20:48] was
[1:20:48] the
[1:20:48] time
[1:20:48] also
[1:20:49] when
[1:20:49] they
[1:20:50] filed
[1:20:50] a
[1:20:50] petition
[1:20:50] on
[1:20:52] the
[1:20:52] disclosure
[1:20:53] of
[1:20:53] transactions
[1:20:54] by
[1:20:54] the
[1:20:54] AMLC
[1:20:55] with
[1:20:55] the
[1:20:56] Quezon
[1:20:56] City
[1:20:56] Regional
[1:20:56] Trial
[1:20:57] Court
[1:20:57] as
[1:20:57] well
[1:20:57] and
[1:20:58] if
[1:20:58] you
[1:20:58] will
[1:20:58] go
[1:20:58] over
[1:20:59] the
[1:20:59] issues
[1:21:01] raised
[1:21:02] in
[1:21:02] the
[1:21:02] petitions
[1:21:02] raised
[1:21:03] in
[1:21:04] the
[1:21:04] Supreme
[1:21:04] Court
[1:21:04] kasama
[1:21:05] din
[1:21:05] yan
[1:21:05] yung
[1:21:06] confidentiality
[1:21:07] ng
[1:21:07] bank
[1:21:08] transactions
[1:21:08] confidentiality
[1:21:09] ng
[1:21:10] AMLOC
[1:21:11] transactions
[1:21:11] so
[1:21:12] as
[1:21:12] early
[1:21:13] as
[1:21:13] now
[1:21:13] we
[1:21:13] anticipate
[1:21:13] already
[1:21:16] challenge
[1:21:16] during
[1:21:16] presentation
[1:21:17] dito
[1:21:18] sa
[1:21:18] Unexplained
[1:21:18] Wealth
[1:21:19] Maraming
[1:21:20] Salamat
[1:21:20] Dwight
[1:21:23] Next
[1:21:23] is
[1:21:24] Isaiah
[1:21:24] Mira
[1:21:25] Puentes
[1:21:25] Apabante
[1:21:27] Billionario
[1:21:28] Hello
[1:21:30] Good
[1:21:30] afternoon
[1:21:31] Regarding
[1:21:32] po ulit
[1:21:33] dun sa
[1:21:33] 16
[1:21:34] required
[1:21:34] number
[1:21:34] of
[1:21:34] votes
[1:21:35] na
[1:21:35] sinasabi
[1:21:35] nila
[1:21:36] Can
[1:21:36] we
[1:21:36] give
[1:21:37] a
[1:21:37] hope
[1:21:37] na
[1:21:37] whatever
[1:21:38] the
[1:21:38] threshold
[1:21:39] is
[1:21:39] kayang
[1:21:40] kayang
[1:21:41] maabot
[1:21:41] para
[1:21:41] maconvict
[1:21:42] si
[1:21:42] Vice
[1:21:42] President
[1:21:43] Sara
[1:21:43] Duterte
[1:21:44] if
[1:21:45] ever
[1:21:45] ma-16
[1:21:46] man
[1:21:46] ma-15
[1:21:47] man
[1:21:47] yan
[1:21:47] kung
[1:21:48] ilan
[1:21:48] man
[1:21:48] It is
[1:21:50] not
[1:21:51] for
[1:21:51] us
[1:21:51] to
[1:21:51] say
[1:21:52] kung
[1:21:54] kayang
[1:21:54] kaya
[1:21:54] abutin
[1:21:55] as
[1:21:56] prosecutors
[1:21:57] our
[1:21:57] sole
[1:21:58] job
[1:21:59] is to
[1:21:59] present
[1:21:59] evidence
[1:22:00] regarding
[1:22:01] the
[1:22:02] charges
[1:22:02] regarding
[1:22:03] the
[1:22:03] articles
[1:22:04] of
[1:22:05] impeachment
[1:22:05] So
[1:22:06] yun
[1:22:06] yun
[1:22:07] yun lang
[1:22:07] po
[1:22:07] ang
[1:22:07] trabaho
[1:22:07] namin
[1:22:08] now
[1:22:08] we
[1:22:09] leave
[1:22:09] it
[1:22:09] up
[1:22:09] to
[1:22:09] the
[1:22:10] Senate
[1:22:10] who
[1:22:11] will
[1:22:11] be
[1:22:11] swayed
[1:22:12] by
[1:22:12] public
[1:22:12] opinion
[1:22:13] once
[1:22:14] we
[1:22:14] lay
[1:22:16] down
[1:22:16] our
[1:22:17] evidence
[1:22:18] yun
[1:22:19] lang
[1:22:19] po
[1:22:19] Also
[1:22:20] as
[1:22:22] I
[1:22:22] understand
[1:22:22] based
[1:22:23] on the
[1:22:23] Constitution
[1:22:23] kasi
[1:22:24] two
[1:22:25] thirds
[1:22:25] of
[1:22:26] all
[1:22:26] Senators
[1:22:27] can
[1:22:27] we
[1:22:27] explain
[1:22:28] to
[1:22:28] the
[1:22:28] public
[1:22:28] kasi
[1:22:28] nakalagay
[1:22:29] doon
[1:22:29] all
[1:22:30] eh
[1:22:30] So
[1:22:31] pakiramdam
[1:22:32] namin
[1:22:32] 24
[1:22:33] If
[1:22:34] you
[1:22:34] want
[1:22:35] to
[1:22:35] be
[1:22:35] literal
[1:22:37] ang
[1:22:39] sinabi
[1:22:39] sa
[1:22:39] Constitution
[1:22:40] two
[1:22:40] thirds
[1:22:41] of
[1:22:41] all
[1:22:41] members
[1:22:42] of
[1:22:42] the
[1:22:42] Senate
[1:22:42] it
[1:22:43] did
[1:22:43] not
[1:22:44] say
[1:22:44] two
[1:22:45] thirds
[1:22:45] of
[1:22:45] the
[1:22:45] 24
[1:22:46] members
[1:22:47] of
[1:22:48] the
[1:22:48] Senate
[1:22:48] So
[1:22:49] I
[1:22:49] think
[1:22:50] the
[1:22:50] use
[1:22:50] of
[1:22:50] all
[1:22:51] and
[1:22:51] we
[1:22:51] can
[1:22:51] check
[1:22:52] perhaps
[1:22:52] this
[1:22:52] from
[1:22:53] the
[1:22:53] framers
[1:22:54] of
[1:22:54] the
[1:22:54] Constitution
[1:22:54] is
[1:22:55] in
[1:22:55] order
[1:22:56] to
[1:22:56] give
[1:22:56] room
[1:22:57] to
[1:22:58] the
[1:22:58] people
[1:22:58] in
[1:22:58] the
[1:22:59] government
[1:22:59] the
[1:23:00] senators
[1:23:01] the
[1:23:01] supreme
[1:23:01] court
[1:23:02] to
[1:23:02] interpret
[1:23:03] the
[1:23:03] same
[1:23:04] to
[1:23:04] a
[1:23:04] way
[1:23:05] that
[1:23:05] the
[1:23:06] constitutional
[1:23:07] mandate
[1:23:07] will
[1:23:08] still
[1:23:08] be
[1:23:08] given
[1:23:09] effect
[1:23:09] Just
[1:23:11] like
[1:23:11] nowadays
[1:23:12] we
[1:23:13] have
[1:23:13] discussion
[1:23:14] about
[1:23:15] how many
[1:23:16] is the
[1:23:16] threshold
[1:23:17] how many
[1:23:18] is the
[1:23:18] quorum
[1:23:18] and then
[1:23:19] we
[1:23:19] are able
[1:23:20] to
[1:23:20] see
[1:23:21] the
[1:23:21] doctrine
[1:23:22] in
[1:23:22] Avellino
[1:23:23] versus
[1:23:24] Cuenco
[1:23:24] So
[1:23:25] I
[1:23:25] think
[1:23:25] these
[1:23:26] decisions
[1:23:27] came up
[1:23:28] because
[1:23:29] during
[1:23:29] the
[1:23:30] time
[1:23:30] they
[1:23:30] also
[1:23:31] anticipated
[1:23:31] things
[1:23:32] like
[1:23:32] this
[1:23:32] things
[1:23:33] which
[1:23:34] we
[1:23:34] are
[1:23:34] encountering
[1:23:35] right
[1:23:35] now
[1:23:36] let us
[1:23:38] anchor
[1:23:39] our
[1:23:39] interpretation
[1:23:40] to the
[1:23:40] mandate
[1:23:40] of the
[1:23:41] senators
[1:23:41] are you
[1:23:42] still
[1:23:43] representing
[1:23:43] the
[1:23:43] interest
[1:23:44] of the
[1:23:44] Filipino
[1:23:44] people
[1:23:45] if the
[1:23:46] answer
[1:23:46] is
[1:23:46] no
[1:23:46] then
[1:23:47] the
[1:23:47] threshold
[1:23:47] must
[1:23:48] be
[1:23:48] reduced
[1:23:48] congressman
[1:23:51] can you
[1:23:52] explain
[1:23:52] to us
[1:23:53] anong
[1:23:53] magiging
[1:23:53] trabaho
[1:23:54] nung
[1:23:54] mga
[1:23:55] senador
[1:23:56] like
[1:23:57] for
[1:23:57] example
[1:23:57] centro
[1:23:57] jingo
[1:23:58] estrada
[1:23:58] anong
[1:23:59] magiging
[1:23:59] role
[1:23:59] na lang
[1:24:00] nila
[1:24:00] at
[1:24:00] pwede
[1:24:00] nilang
[1:24:01] gawin
[1:24:01] during
[1:24:02] the
[1:24:02] impeachment
[1:24:02] trial
[1:24:03] first
[1:24:03] and foremost
[1:24:04] sabi
[1:24:04] sa
[1:24:05] plunder
[1:24:05] law
[1:24:06] at
[1:24:06] saka
[1:24:06] sa
[1:24:07] RA3019
[1:24:08] Antigraph
[1:24:09] and
[1:24:10] Corrupt
[1:24:10] Practices
[1:24:11] Act
[1:24:11] kapag
[1:24:12] na-filan
[1:24:12] sila
[1:24:13] ng
[1:24:13] kaso
[1:24:13] suspended
[1:24:14] din
[1:24:15] sila
[1:24:15] sa
[1:24:16] pagiging
[1:24:16] senador
[1:24:17] so
[1:24:18] what
[1:24:18] function
[1:24:19] are we
[1:24:20] expecting
[1:24:20] them
[1:24:21] to
[1:24:21] discharge
[1:24:22] if
[1:24:23] they
[1:24:23] are
[1:24:23] suspended
[1:24:24] from
[1:24:25] their
[1:24:25] official
[1:24:25] capacity
[1:24:26] as
[1:24:26] members
[1:24:27] of
[1:24:27] the
[1:24:27] Senate
[1:24:27] are they
[1:24:28] allowed
[1:24:29] to submit
[1:24:29] letter
[1:24:29] ba
[1:24:30] na
[1:24:30] magiging
[1:24:30] side
[1:24:31] nila
[1:24:31] during
[1:24:32] the
[1:24:32] impeachment
[1:24:32] trial
[1:24:33] if
[1:24:34] we
[1:24:35] will
[1:24:35] be
[1:24:35] following
[1:24:36] strictly
[1:24:36] the
[1:24:36] provisions
[1:24:37] of
[1:24:37] the
[1:24:37] plunder
[1:24:38] law
[1:24:38] and
[1:24:38] RA3019
[1:24:39] while
[1:24:41] there
[1:24:41] is
[1:24:42] the
[1:24:42] suspension
[1:24:42] they
[1:24:43] are
[1:24:43] not
[1:24:43] considered
[1:24:44] as
[1:24:44] members
[1:24:44] of
[1:24:44] the
[1:24:45] Senate
[1:24:45] Another
[1:24:48] question
[1:24:48] regarding
[1:24:49] magiging
[1:24:50] presiding
[1:24:50] officer
[1:24:51] ng
[1:24:51] Senate
[1:24:52] may
[1:24:53] nagsasuggest
[1:24:54] pong
[1:24:54] senador
[1:24:54] na
[1:24:55] dapat
[1:24:55] abogado
[1:24:56] actually
[1:24:57] according
[1:24:57] to
[1:24:58] Senator
[1:24:58] Ping
[1:24:58] Lacson
[1:24:59] kung
[1:25:01] sakali
[1:25:01] rao
[1:25:02] pwede
[1:25:02] magiging
[1:25:02] presiding
[1:25:03] officer
[1:25:03] presiding
[1:25:11] officer
[1:25:11] in all
[1:25:14] honesty
[1:25:14] I don't
[1:25:15] see
[1:25:15] anything
[1:25:15] wrong
[1:25:16] about
[1:25:17] having a
[1:25:18] presiding
[1:25:18] officer
[1:25:19] who is
[1:25:19] a
[1:25:19] non-lawyer
[1:25:20] like our
[1:25:21] acting
[1:25:22] SP
[1:25:22] Wingachalian
[1:25:24] let us
[1:25:25] remember
[1:25:25] that the
[1:25:26] impeachment
[1:25:26] trial is
[1:25:27] not purely
[1:25:28] a legal
[1:25:29] process
[1:25:30] it is
[1:25:30] sui generis
[1:25:31] in one
[1:25:33] way it
[1:25:33] is
[1:25:34] constitutional
[1:25:34] in another
[1:25:35] way it
[1:25:36] is
[1:25:36] administrative
[1:25:37] and in
[1:25:38] another way
[1:25:39] as well
[1:25:39] it is
[1:25:40] legal
[1:25:40] what is
[1:25:41] important
[1:25:42] is for
[1:25:43] us to
[1:25:43] be able
[1:25:43] to ferret
[1:25:44] out the
[1:25:44] truth
[1:25:45] which means
[1:25:47] that
[1:25:47] the
[1:25:48] evidence
[1:25:49] must be
[1:25:49] given
[1:25:50] ample
[1:25:51] opportunity
[1:25:51] to be
[1:25:52] presented
[1:25:53] and if
[1:25:53] we will
[1:25:54] always be
[1:25:54] challenged
[1:25:55] by rules
[1:25:55] on
[1:25:56] technicalities
[1:25:57] rules
[1:25:57] on
[1:25:58] procedure
[1:25:58] objections
[1:25:59] to the
[1:26:00] evidence
[1:26:00] which are
[1:26:01] being
[1:26:01] presented
[1:26:02] it might
[1:26:03] defeat
[1:26:03] the purpose
[1:26:04] of this
[1:26:04] impeachment
[1:26:05] trial
[1:26:05] remember
[1:26:06] that
[1:26:06] what
[1:26:06] we
[1:26:07] are
[1:26:07] testing
[1:26:07] here
[1:26:08] is
[1:26:08] the
[1:26:08] fitness
[1:26:09] of
[1:26:10] the
[1:26:10] public
[1:26:10] official
[1:26:11] to
[1:26:11] continue
[1:26:11] holding
[1:26:12] office
[1:26:12] and
[1:26:13] not
[1:26:13] the
[1:26:14] criminal
[1:26:15] liability
[1:26:15] not
[1:26:16] the
[1:26:17] civil
[1:26:17] liability
[1:26:18] after
[1:26:20] the
[1:26:21] decision
[1:26:21] on
[1:26:22] this
[1:26:22] impeachment
[1:26:22] trial
[1:26:23] they
[1:26:23] can
[1:26:24] still
[1:26:24] be
[1:26:24] held
[1:26:25] liable
[1:26:25] for
[1:26:25] prosecution
[1:26:26] to
[1:26:27] whatever
[1:26:27] cases
[1:26:28] may
[1:26:28] be
[1:26:28] filed
[1:26:28] against
[1:26:28] them
[1:26:29] last
[1:26:30] question
[1:26:31] regarding
[1:26:33] additional
[1:26:34] evidence
[1:26:35] which is
[1:26:36] regarding
[1:26:36] undeclared
[1:26:39] property
[1:26:39] before
[1:26:41] sinasabi
[1:26:41] natin
[1:26:42] overwhelming
[1:26:42] evidence
[1:26:43] during
[1:26:44] the
[1:26:44] house
[1:26:45] committee
[1:26:45] on
[1:26:45] justice
[1:26:46] hearing
[1:26:46] can
[1:26:47] we
[1:26:47] say
[1:26:47] ba
[1:26:48] mas
[1:26:48] mabigat
[1:26:49] itong
[1:26:49] bagong
[1:26:49] ebidensya
[1:26:50] that's
[1:26:50] why
[1:26:51] dinagdag
[1:26:52] natin
[1:26:52] itong
[1:26:52] evidence
[1:26:53] ito
[1:26:53] sa mga
[1:26:54] list
[1:26:54] of
[1:26:54] evidence
[1:26:54] against
[1:26:55] the
[1:26:55] vice
[1:26:56] president
[1:26:56] I
[1:26:58] said
[1:26:59] a while
[1:27:00] ago
[1:27:00] that
[1:27:00] the
[1:27:01] reason
[1:27:01] why
[1:27:02] we
[1:27:02] added
[1:27:03] names
[1:27:05] to
[1:27:05] the
[1:27:05] list
[1:27:05] of
[1:27:06] witnesses
[1:27:06] documents
[1:27:08] to
[1:27:08] the
[1:27:08] list
[1:27:09] of
[1:27:09] exhibits
[1:27:10] is
[1:27:10] because
[1:27:10] of
[1:27:11] the
[1:27:11] rule
[1:27:11] that
[1:27:13] witnesses
[1:27:13] and
[1:27:15] exhibits
[1:27:16] which
[1:27:17] are not
[1:27:17] included
[1:27:18] in the
[1:27:18] pretrial
[1:27:18] brief
[1:27:19] will not
[1:27:20] be
[1:27:20] allowed
[1:27:21] to be
[1:27:21] presented
[1:27:21] during
[1:27:22] the
[1:27:22] trial
[1:27:22] so
[1:27:23] it's
[1:27:24] not
[1:27:24] a
[1:27:24] question
[1:27:25] of
[1:27:25] probative
[1:27:26] value
[1:27:26] or
[1:27:27] weight
[1:27:28] of
[1:27:28] the
[1:27:28] evidence
[1:27:29] it
[1:27:29] is
[1:27:29] a
[1:27:30] question
[1:27:30] of
[1:27:30] inclusion
[1:27:31] of
[1:27:32] all
[1:27:33] the
[1:27:33] witnesses
[1:27:33] and
[1:27:34] evidence
[1:27:34] to
[1:27:35] make
[1:27:35] sure
[1:27:35] that
[1:27:36] we
[1:27:36] will
[1:27:36] be
[1:27:36] allowed
[1:27:37] to
[1:27:37] present
[1:27:37] them
[1:27:37] during
[1:27:38] the
[1:27:38] trial
[1:27:38] Thank
[1:27:42] you
[1:27:42] Isaya
[1:27:44] Next
[1:27:46] is
[1:27:46] Isa
[1:27:49] Bendano
[1:27:49] Mali
[1:27:50] of
[1:27:50] DC
[1:27:50] BB
[1:27:51] Magandang
[1:27:53] hapon
[1:27:54] po
[1:27:54] Isa
[1:27:54] Mali
[1:27:54] po
[1:27:55] First
[1:27:56] question
[1:27:56] lang
[1:27:56] po
[1:27:56] kasi
[1:27:57] nag
[1:27:57] anunsyo
[1:27:58] na po
[1:27:58] yung
[1:27:58] Malacanang
[1:27:59] inutos
[1:27:59] na po
[1:28:00] nating
[1:28:00] yung
[1:28:00] House
[1:28:01] of
[1:28:01] Representatives
[1:28:01] po
[1:28:02] ba
[1:28:02] meron
[1:28:02] mga
[1:28:02] target
[1:28:02] pang
[1:28:03] gagawin
[1:28:04] or
[1:28:04] tatapus
[1:28:04] yung
[1:28:04] mga
[1:28:05] trabaho
[1:28:05] Thank
[1:28:06] you
[1:28:06] po
[1:28:06] Well
[1:28:14] on
[1:28:14] the
[1:28:15] ordinary
[1:28:17] committee
[1:28:18] hearings
[1:28:19] ongoing
[1:28:19] pa
[1:28:20] naman
[1:28:20] eh
[1:28:20] In fact
[1:28:21] today
[1:28:21] ang
[1:28:22] committee
[1:28:22] on
[1:28:22] education
[1:28:23] is
[1:28:23] holding
[1:28:24] a
[1:28:24] committee
[1:28:24] hearing
[1:28:25] so
[1:28:25] tuloy
[1:28:25] tuloy
[1:28:25] naman
[1:28:26] po
[1:28:26] yan
[1:28:26] Since
[1:28:27] you
[1:28:27] asked
[1:28:29] about
[1:28:29] yung
[1:28:30] trabaho
[1:28:30] we have
[1:28:31] already
[1:28:31] delivered
[1:28:32] out of
[1:28:33] the
[1:28:33] 50
[1:28:34] led
[1:28:35] up
[1:28:35] priorities
[1:28:36] we were
[1:28:36] able
[1:28:36] to
[1:28:37] pass
[1:28:37] on
[1:28:38] third
[1:28:38] and
[1:28:38] final
[1:28:39] reading
[1:28:39] 20
[1:28:41] plus
[1:28:41] 26
[1:28:43] 26
[1:28:43] so
[1:28:44] half
[1:28:44] of
[1:28:45] the
[1:28:45] LEDAC
[1:28:45] priorities
[1:28:46] so
[1:28:46] if
[1:28:47] there's
[1:28:47] if
[1:28:48] Malacan
[1:28:49] yang
[1:28:49] request
[1:28:50] for a
[1:28:50] special
[1:28:50] session
[1:28:51] we
[1:28:51] anticipate
[1:28:51] and
[1:28:52] we
[1:28:52] welcome
[1:28:52] that
[1:28:52] And
[1:28:54] kayo
[1:28:55] po
[1:28:55] sa
[1:28:55] part
[1:28:56] po
[1:28:56] ng
[1:28:56] house
[1:28:57] hoping
[1:28:57] din
[1:28:57] po
[1:28:57] ba
[1:28:57] kayo
[1:28:58] na
[1:28:58] dun
[1:28:58] sa
[1:28:58] special
[1:28:59] session
[1:28:59] na
[1:28:59] yun
[1:28:59] mapa
[1:29:00] plan
[1:29:00] siya
[1:29:01] na
[1:29:01] po
[1:29:01] yung
[1:29:01] gusot
[1:29:02] sa
[1:29:02] senado
[1:29:02] As
[1:29:05] far
[1:29:05] as
[1:29:06] the
[1:29:06] house
[1:29:06] is
[1:29:06] concerned
[1:29:07] you
[1:29:08] know
[1:29:08] we
[1:29:09] again
[1:29:11] we
[1:29:12] maintain
[1:29:12] our
[1:29:12] institutional
[1:29:13] respect
[1:29:14] to
[1:29:14] our
[1:29:14] co-equal
[1:29:15] branch
[1:29:15] if
[1:29:15] that
[1:29:15] would
[1:29:16] be
[1:29:16] part
[1:29:16] of
[1:29:16] the
[1:29:17] issues
[1:29:17] that
[1:29:18] they
[1:29:18] need
[1:29:18] to
[1:29:18] settle
[1:29:18] in
[1:29:19] the
[1:29:19] Senate
[1:29:19] that
[1:29:19] is
[1:29:20] entirely
[1:29:20] within
[1:29:20] the
[1:29:21] decision
[1:29:21] of
[1:29:22] the
[1:29:22] Senate
[1:29:22] but
[1:29:22] I
[1:29:24] also
[1:29:24] would
[1:29:25] expect
[1:29:25] that
[1:29:25] since
[1:29:26] we
[1:29:26] if
[1:29:27] for
[1:29:27] example
[1:29:27] Malacanang
[1:29:28] may
[1:29:29] nag-receive
[1:29:30] na ba
[1:29:30] tayo
[1:29:31] wala
[1:29:31] pa
[1:29:31] ito
[1:29:33] yung
[1:29:33] nasa
[1:29:34] dapat
[1:29:36] dito
[1:29:38] well
[1:29:42] sabi ko
[1:29:42] nga
[1:29:42] yung
[1:29:43] mga
[1:29:43] ledag
[1:29:43] priorities
[1:29:44] tapos
[1:29:45] out
[1:29:45] of
[1:29:46] the
[1:29:46] 26
[1:29:46] so
[1:29:47] tapos
[1:29:48] na
[1:29:48] po
[1:29:48] natin
[1:29:48] na
[1:29:48] transmit
[1:29:49] na
[1:29:49] po
[1:29:49] natin
[1:29:49] yung
[1:29:50] sa
[1:29:50] Senate
[1:29:51] yung
[1:29:51] anti-political
[1:29:52] dynasty
[1:29:53] X
[1:29:54] Act
[1:29:54] amendments
[1:29:55] to the
[1:29:55] universal
[1:29:56] access
[1:29:56] to
[1:29:57] quality
[1:29:58] tertiary
[1:29:59] education
[1:30:00] so
[1:30:01] if
[1:30:02] there
[1:30:02] will
[1:30:02] be
[1:30:02] a
[1:30:03] special
[1:30:03] session
[1:30:04] again
[1:30:04] if
[1:30:05] we
[1:30:06] ask
[1:30:06] us
[1:30:06] do
[1:30:07] sa
[1:30:07] Senate
[1:30:08] leadership
[1:30:08] issue
[1:30:09] that's
[1:30:09] entirely
[1:30:10] for
[1:30:10] the
[1:30:10] Senate
[1:30:10] to
[1:30:10] decide
[1:30:11] but
[1:30:12] we
[1:30:12] anticipate
[1:30:12] that
[1:30:13] they
[1:30:13] should
[1:30:13] take
[1:30:13] that
[1:30:14] opportunity
[1:30:14] to
[1:30:15] finally
[1:30:15] settle
[1:30:15] the
[1:30:16] issue
[1:30:17] on
[1:30:17] leadership
[1:30:18] to
[1:30:21] your
[1:30:23] question
[1:30:23] we
[1:30:23] can
[1:30:24] only
[1:30:24] hope
[1:30:24] and
[1:30:24] pray
[1:30:25] but
[1:30:26] that
[1:30:26] is
[1:30:26] of
[1:30:27] course
[1:30:27] the
[1:30:27] prerogative
[1:30:28] and
[1:30:28] judgment
[1:30:28] that
[1:30:29] exclusively
[1:30:29] belongs
[1:30:30] to
[1:30:30] the
[1:30:30] Senate
[1:30:30] we
[1:30:31] cannot
[1:30:32] meddle
[1:30:32] on
[1:30:33] the
[1:30:33] issues
[1:30:33] of
[1:30:33] their
[1:30:34] leadership
[1:30:34] but
[1:30:35] we
[1:30:35] are
[1:30:35] hoping
[1:30:35] and
[1:30:36] pray
[1:30:36] that
[1:30:37] they
[1:30:37] will
[1:30:37] be
[1:30:37] able
[1:30:37] to
[1:30:38] fix
[1:30:38] it
[1:30:38] on
[1:30:38] the
[1:30:39] occasion
[1:30:39] of
[1:30:39] this
[1:30:39] special
[1:30:40] session
[1:30:40] another
[1:30:42] another
[1:30:42] pa
[1:30:42] po
[1:30:43] na
[1:30:44] announced
[1:30:44] na
[1:30:44] first
[1:30:45] batch
[1:30:45] of
[1:30:46] private
[1:30:46] prosecutors
[1:30:47] so
[1:30:47] when
[1:30:48] we
[1:30:48] will
[1:30:48] have
[1:30:49] second
[1:30:49] batch
[1:30:50] and
[1:30:51] continue
[1:30:51] because
[1:30:52] there are
[1:30:52] people
[1:30:53] who
[1:30:53] are
[1:30:54] going to
[1:30:55] apply
[1:30:56] and audition
[1:30:57] to be
[1:30:58] prosecutor
[1:30:59] so
[1:30:59] when
[1:31:00] we
[1:31:00] will
[1:31:00] have
[1:31:01] second
[1:31:01] batch
[1:31:01] to
[1:31:02] to
[1:31:02] to
[1:31:02] to
[1:31:02] to
[1:31:02] to
[1:31:02] to
[1:31:02] the
[1:31:04] private
[1:31:04] prosecutors
[1:31:05] keep
[1:31:05] on
[1:31:05] coming
[1:31:06] to
[1:31:07] join
[1:31:07] the
[1:31:07] impeachment
[1:31:08] team
[1:31:09] and
[1:31:10] we're
[1:31:10] happy
[1:31:10] about
[1:31:10] that
[1:31:11] because
[1:31:11] that
[1:31:11] is
[1:31:12] a
[1:31:12] validation
[1:31:12] that
[1:31:13] even
[1:31:14] private
[1:31:14] lawyers
[1:31:15] believe
[1:31:18] in the
[1:31:18] cause
[1:31:18] of the
[1:31:19] House
[1:31:19] of
[1:31:19] Representatives
[1:31:20] they
[1:31:20] are
[1:31:21] joining
[1:31:21] us
[1:31:21] in
[1:31:21] our
[1:31:22] stand
[1:31:22] to
[1:31:23] protect
[1:31:24] and
[1:31:24] preserve
[1:31:25] and
[1:31:25] enforce
[1:31:26] this
[1:31:26] accountability
[1:31:27] mechanism
[1:31:28] so
[1:31:29] to
[1:31:29] your
[1:31:29] question
[1:31:30] let us
[1:31:31] see
[1:31:31] this
[1:31:32] week
[1:31:32] if we can
[1:31:33] introduce
[1:31:34] the next
[1:31:34] batch
[1:31:35] but
[1:31:35] definitely
[1:31:36] all of
[1:31:36] them
[1:31:37] will
[1:31:37] be
[1:31:37] introduced
[1:31:37] before
[1:31:38] we
[1:31:38] start
[1:31:38] our
[1:31:39] trial
[1:31:39] on
[1:31:39] July
[1:31:39] 6
[1:31:40] and
[1:31:41] last
[1:31:41] question
[1:31:42] how are you
[1:31:43] going to
[1:31:51] take
[1:31:52] impeachment
[1:31:53] I'm sure
[1:31:55] may
[1:31:55] personal
[1:31:56] challenges
[1:31:56] din
[1:31:57] po
[1:31:57] kayong
[1:31:57] naranasan
[1:31:58] pero
[1:31:58] kayo
[1:31:58] po
[1:31:59] ano
[1:31:59] po
[1:32:00] yung
[1:32:00] siguro
[1:32:00] mabigat
[1:32:02] na
[1:32:02] hamon
[1:32:03] na
[1:32:03] naranasan
[1:32:04] nyo
[1:32:05] pero
[1:32:05] tuloy
[1:32:05] pa
[1:32:05] rin
[1:32:06] ito
[1:32:06] pong
[1:32:06] pag
[1:32:07] susulong
[1:32:08] nyo
[1:32:08] ng
[1:32:08] impeachment
[1:32:09] the only
[1:32:10] challenge
[1:32:11] that I
[1:32:11] have
[1:32:12] is
[1:32:12] I
[1:32:13] do
[1:32:13] not
[1:32:13] have
[1:32:13] anymore
[1:32:14] the
[1:32:14] luxury
[1:32:15] of
[1:32:15] time
[1:32:15] of
[1:32:16] moving
[1:32:16] around
[1:32:16] my
[1:32:17] district
[1:32:17] dati
[1:32:18] kasi
[1:32:19] naiikutan
[1:32:20] ko
[1:32:20] lahat
[1:32:20] ng
[1:32:20] patay
[1:32:21] napupuntahan
[1:32:23] ko
[1:32:23] lahat
[1:32:23] ng
[1:32:23] okasyon
[1:32:24] that
[1:32:25] I
[1:32:25] cannot
[1:32:26] do
[1:32:26] now
[1:32:26] because
[1:32:27] I
[1:32:27] need
[1:32:27] to
[1:32:27] focus
[1:32:28] to
[1:32:29] our
[1:32:29] preparation
[1:32:30] for
[1:32:30] this
[1:32:30] impeachment
[1:32:31] trial
[1:32:31] nonetheless
[1:32:32] ako po
[1:32:33] nagpapasalamat
[1:32:34] sa lahat
[1:32:34] ng
[1:32:34] aking
[1:32:35] mga
[1:32:35] kababayan
[1:32:36] from
[1:32:37] Batanga
[1:32:37] 2nd
[1:32:37] district
[1:32:38] nagpaalam
[1:32:39] po
[1:32:39] ako
[1:32:39] sa
[1:32:40] kanila
[1:32:40] until
[1:32:41] this
[1:32:42] impeachment
[1:32:42] trial
[1:32:43] is
[1:32:43] concluded
[1:32:43] and
[1:32:44] the
[1:32:45] reaction
[1:32:45] is
[1:32:45] very
[1:32:46] much
[1:32:46] positive
[1:32:47] na
[1:32:47] uunawaan
[1:32:48] po
[1:32:48] ng
[1:32:49] aking
[1:32:49] mga
[1:32:49] kababayan
[1:32:50] from
[1:32:50] Batanga
[1:32:50] 2nd
[1:32:51] district
[1:32:51] what
[1:32:52] accountability
[1:32:53] mechanism
[1:32:53] is all
[1:32:54] about
[1:32:54] as well
[1:32:55] as the
[1:32:55] significance
[1:32:56] of the
[1:32:57] constitutional
[1:32:57] mandate
[1:32:58] for this
[1:32:58] impeachment
[1:32:59] process
[1:33:00] mabuti
[1:33:05] naman
[1:33:05] salamat
[1:33:06] sa
[1:33:07] pamungusta
[1:33:07] actually
[1:33:07] pinaka
[1:33:08] I think
[1:33:09] I can
[1:33:09] speak
[1:33:09] for
[1:33:10] everyone
[1:33:11] here
[1:33:11] the
[1:33:12] volume
[1:33:13] of
[1:33:13] attacks
[1:33:14] and
[1:33:15] misinformation
[1:33:16] that
[1:33:17] thrown
[1:33:17] our
[1:33:18] way
[1:33:18] isa yan
[1:33:20] sa pinaka
[1:33:20] challenging
[1:33:21] but
[1:33:21] these
[1:33:21] are
[1:33:21] part
[1:33:22] of
[1:33:22] the
[1:33:22] strategy
[1:33:23] of
[1:33:24] those
[1:33:24] who
[1:33:24] are
[1:33:25] against
[1:33:25] accountability
[1:33:26] those
[1:33:27] who
[1:33:27] are
[1:33:27] against
[1:33:28] our
[1:33:30] job
[1:33:30] to
[1:33:31] you
[1:33:31] know
[1:33:32] against
[1:33:32] the
[1:33:33] members
[1:33:33] of the
[1:33:34] house
[1:33:34] prosecution
[1:33:34] panel
[1:33:35] to
[1:33:36] exercise
[1:33:36] their
[1:33:37] duly
[1:33:37] mandated
[1:33:37] constitutional
[1:33:38] directive
[1:33:39] to
[1:33:40] proceed
[1:33:40] with
[1:33:41] the
[1:33:41] impeachment
[1:33:42] these
[1:33:43] are
[1:33:43] part
[1:33:44] of
[1:33:44] their
[1:33:44] effort
[1:33:44] to
[1:33:46] probably
[1:33:46] silence
[1:33:47] us
[1:33:47] to
[1:33:48] scare
[1:33:49] us
[1:33:49] away
[1:33:49] but
[1:33:51] sa
[1:33:53] amin
[1:33:53] lang
[1:33:53] ang
[1:33:54] sagot
[1:33:55] namin
[1:33:56] dyan
[1:33:56] ay mas
[1:33:57] tumatatagpo
[1:33:58] ang aming
[1:33:59] loob
[1:33:59] dahil
[1:34:00] we stand
[1:34:01] behind
[1:34:02] we stand
[1:34:03] in front
[1:34:03] side by
[1:34:04] side
[1:34:04] with the
[1:34:05] constitution
[1:34:06] this
[1:34:07] is
[1:34:07] a
[1:34:07] constitutional
[1:34:07] duty
[1:34:08] that
[1:34:08] we
[1:34:08] need
[1:34:08] to
[1:34:08] perform
[1:34:09] so
[1:34:10] no
[1:34:10] matter
[1:34:10] that
[1:34:11] the
[1:34:11] volume
[1:34:12] of
[1:34:12] fake
[1:34:12] news
[1:34:13] attacks
[1:34:14] against
[1:34:15] us
[1:34:15] we
[1:34:16] will
[1:34:16] not
[1:34:17] be
[1:34:19] silenced
[1:34:20] and
[1:34:20] we
[1:34:20] continue
[1:34:21] on
[1:34:21] we
[1:34:21] will
[1:34:22] soldier
[1:34:22] on
[1:34:23] thank
[1:34:29] you
[1:34:29] very
[1:34:30] much
[1:34:30] for
[1:34:31] your
[1:34:32] concern
[1:34:33] so
[1:34:37] it's
[1:34:45] actually
[1:34:46] very
[1:34:46] tiring
[1:34:46] for
[1:34:47] us
[1:34:47] for
[1:34:48] the
[1:34:48] prosecutors
[1:34:49] for
[1:34:50] the
[1:34:50] comms
[1:34:51] for
[1:34:51] our
[1:34:52] talking
[1:34:52] heads
[1:34:53] to be
[1:34:54] part
[1:34:54] of
[1:34:54] this
[1:34:54] whole
[1:34:55] process
[1:34:56] compared
[1:34:58] to
[1:34:58] our
[1:34:58] colleagues
[1:34:59] in
[1:34:59] congress
[1:35:31] law
[1:35:32] school
[1:35:32] meron
[1:35:32] po
[1:35:33] kaming
[1:35:33] highlighters
[1:35:33] nagbabasa
[1:35:34] po
[1:35:34] kami
[1:35:34] araw-araw
[1:35:35] and
[1:35:36] that's
[1:35:37] what's
[1:35:37] been
[1:35:38] that's
[1:35:40] what we've
[1:35:41] been
[1:35:41] doing
[1:35:41] lately
[1:35:42] so
[1:35:42] yes
[1:35:43] nabawasan
[1:35:44] po
[1:35:44] ang
[1:35:44] oras
[1:35:45] namin
[1:35:45] sa
[1:35:46] distrito
[1:35:47] ako
[1:35:48] nabawasan
[1:35:49] ng
[1:35:49] konti
[1:35:49] ang
[1:35:50] pag
[1:35:52] alaga
[1:35:53] ko
[1:35:53] ng
[1:35:53] aking
[1:35:54] one
[1:35:54] and
[1:35:54] only
[1:35:55] son
[1:35:55] and
[1:35:56] hindi
[1:35:56] ko
[1:35:56] na
[1:35:56] natutukan
[1:35:57] ng
[1:35:57] kanyang
[1:35:57] lessons
[1:35:59] lalo
[1:36:00] na
[1:36:00] nung
[1:36:00] towards
[1:36:01] the
[1:36:02] end
[1:36:02] of
[1:36:02] school
[1:36:02] and
[1:36:02] ngayon
[1:36:03] start
[1:36:03] na
[1:36:03] naman
[1:36:04] but
[1:36:04] you
[1:36:05] know
[1:36:05] we
[1:36:05] always
[1:36:05] say
[1:36:06] that
[1:36:06] we're
[1:36:06] doing
[1:36:06] this
[1:36:07] for
[1:36:08] accountability
[1:36:09] for
[1:36:09] the
[1:36:10] country
[1:36:10] and
[1:36:11] we
[1:36:11] know
[1:36:11] that
[1:36:11] we
[1:36:11] will
[1:36:12] all
[1:36:12] see it
[1:36:13] through
[1:36:13] and
[1:36:14] gaya
[1:36:15] po
[1:36:15] ng
[1:36:16] lagi
[1:36:16] namin
[1:36:16] sinasabi
[1:36:17] para
[1:36:17] po
[1:36:17] sa
[1:36:18] bayan
[1:36:18] ito
[1:36:20] maraming
[1:36:20] salamat
[1:36:21] po
[1:36:21] salamat
[1:36:23] Isa
[1:36:23] susunod
[1:36:24] si
[1:36:24] Willie
[1:36:24] Delgado
[1:36:25] from
[1:36:26] PRTV
[1:36:27] magandang
[1:36:34] hapon
[1:36:35] during
[1:36:36] impeachment
[1:36:38] ni
[1:36:38] dating
[1:36:39] Pangulong
[1:36:39] Joseph
[1:36:40] Estrada
[1:36:40] si
[1:36:44] attorney
[1:36:44] Josef
[1:36:46] Flaminiano
[1:36:46] ang
[1:36:47] naging
[1:36:47] trabaho
[1:36:48] niya
[1:36:48] objection
[1:36:48] objection
[1:36:49] may
[1:36:50] ananticipate
[1:36:50] ba
[1:36:50] kayong
[1:36:51] ganito
[1:36:51] since
[1:36:52] hindi
[1:36:53] naman
[1:36:53] direct
[1:36:53] sumagot
[1:36:54] sa mga
[1:36:55] articles
[1:36:55] si
[1:36:56] Vice
[1:36:56] President
[1:36:56] Sara
[1:36:57] Duterte
[1:36:58] at
[1:36:58] kung
[1:36:58] meron
[1:36:58] man
[1:36:59] hindi
[1:37:00] ho
[1:37:00] ba
[1:37:00] medyo
[1:37:01] mahihirapan
[1:37:02] since
[1:37:02] ang
[1:37:03] tatay
[1:37:03] yung
[1:37:03] presiding
[1:37:04] officer
[1:37:04] ay
[1:37:04] hindi
[1:37:05] abogado
[1:37:05] who
[1:37:07] can
[1:37:07] determine
[1:37:07] kung
[1:37:08] tama
[1:37:08] o
[1:37:09] hindi
[1:37:09] yung
[1:37:09] objections
[1:37:10] kung
[1:37:11] ina
[1:37:12] anticipate
[1:37:12] namin
[1:37:13] yung
[1:37:13] objections
[1:37:14] definitely
[1:37:15] because
[1:37:16] that
[1:37:16] is
[1:37:16] part
[1:37:17] of
[1:37:17] the
[1:37:17] rules
[1:37:17] on
[1:37:18] presentation
[1:37:18] of
[1:37:19] evidence
[1:37:19] meron
[1:37:20] tayong
[1:37:20] rules
[1:37:21] on
[1:37:21] admissibility
[1:37:22] competency
[1:37:24] no
[1:37:25] and
[1:37:25] these
[1:37:25] are
[1:37:26] grounds
[1:37:26] of
[1:37:27] objection
[1:37:27] that
[1:37:28] is
[1:37:28] innate
[1:37:29] in
[1:37:30] every
[1:37:30] presentation
[1:37:31] of
[1:37:31] evidence
[1:37:32] now
[1:37:32] to
[1:37:32] your
[1:37:33] question
[1:37:33] kung
[1:37:33] mahihirapan
[1:37:34] ho ba
[1:37:35] ang
[1:37:35] presiding
[1:37:36] officer
[1:37:36] who
[1:37:37] is
[1:37:37] a
[1:37:37] non
[1:37:37] lawyer
[1:37:38] that
[1:37:38] is
[1:37:38] the
[1:37:38] point
[1:37:39] when
[1:37:40] I
[1:37:40] said
[1:37:40] earlier
[1:37:41] that
[1:37:41] this
[1:37:42] should
[1:37:42] be
[1:37:43] substance
[1:37:43] over
[1:37:44] technicalities
[1:37:45] because
[1:37:45] this
[1:37:46] is
[1:37:46] not
[1:37:46] a
[1:37:46] purely
[1:37:47] legal
[1:37:47] case
[1:37:48] therefore
[1:37:49] dapat
[1:37:50] i-relax
[1:37:51] ang
[1:37:51] technicalities
[1:37:52] to
[1:37:53] pave way
[1:37:53] in
[1:37:54] ferreting
[1:37:55] out
[1:37:55] the
[1:37:55] truth
[1:37:56] because
[1:37:56] what
[1:37:56] is
[1:37:57] important
[1:37:57] in
[1:37:58] this
[1:37:58] trial
[1:37:59] is
[1:37:59] to
[1:37:59] be
[1:37:59] able
[1:38:00] to
[1:38:00] show
[1:38:01] what
[1:38:02] is
[1:38:02] the
[1:38:02] truth
[1:38:02] which
[1:38:04] will
[1:38:04] guide
[1:38:05] our
[1:38:05] senator
[1:38:05] judges
[1:38:06] in
[1:38:06] deciding
[1:38:07] whether
[1:38:07] to
[1:38:07] convict
[1:38:08] or
[1:38:08] to
[1:38:08] acquit
[1:38:09] I
[1:38:12] think
[1:38:36] the
[1:38:37] constitutional
[1:38:37] provision
[1:38:38] is on
[1:38:39] the
[1:38:39] conviction
[1:38:39] only
[1:38:40] so
[1:38:42] any
[1:38:42] occasion
[1:38:43] which
[1:38:43] will
[1:38:43] not
[1:38:44] result
[1:38:44] to
[1:38:45] two
[1:38:45] thirds
[1:38:46] of
[1:38:46] all
[1:38:46] the
[1:38:46] members
[1:38:47] of
[1:38:47] the
[1:38:47] Senate
[1:38:48] should
[1:38:48] result
[1:38:48] to
[1:38:49] acquittal
[1:38:49] regardless
[1:38:51] of
[1:38:51] the
[1:38:51] number
[1:38:51] regardless
[1:38:54] of
[1:38:54] the
[1:38:54] number
[1:38:54] basta
[1:38:55] hindi
[1:38:55] mo
[1:38:55] maabot
[1:38:56] ang
[1:38:56] two
[1:38:56] thirds
[1:38:56] of
[1:38:57] all
[1:38:57] the
[1:38:57] members
[1:38:57] of
[1:38:58] the
[1:38:58] Senate
[1:38:58] regardless
[1:39:00] of
[1:39:01] how
[1:39:01] we
[1:39:01] interpret
[1:39:02] all
[1:39:02] basta
[1:39:03] hindi
[1:39:03] mo
[1:39:03] siya
[1:39:04] maabot
[1:39:04] that
[1:39:04] is
[1:39:05] automatic
[1:39:05] acquittal
[1:39:06] all
[1:39:09] all
[1:39:09] all
[1:39:09] right
[1:39:09] all
[1:39:10] right
[1:39:11] all
[1:39:12] right
[1:39:12] um
[1:39:13] yung
[1:39:13] idea
[1:39:14] na
[1:39:14] gumamit
[1:39:15] sa
[1:39:15] local
[1:39:16] dialect
[1:39:16] kasama
[1:39:17] rin
[1:39:18] ho
[1:39:18] ba
[1:39:18] yung
[1:39:18] possible
[1:39:18] na
[1:39:19] idea
[1:39:19] na
[1:39:19] even
[1:39:20] dun
[1:39:20] sa
[1:39:20] mga
[1:39:21] may
[1:39:22] hearing
[1:39:22] impaired
[1:39:23] isa
[1:39:23] ma
[1:39:23] rin
[1:39:23] para
[1:39:24] maintindihan
[1:39:25] nila
[1:39:25] I think
[1:39:28] we have
[1:39:28] to be
[1:39:29] more
[1:39:29] inclusive
[1:39:29] this is
[1:39:30] for
[1:39:31] the
[1:39:31] nation
[1:39:31] this is
[1:39:32] for
[1:39:32] the
[1:39:32] people
[1:39:32] this is
[1:39:33] for
[1:39:33] our
[1:39:33] country
[1:39:33] so
[1:39:34] everyone
[1:39:35] all
[1:39:35] sectors
[1:39:35] not only
[1:39:36] language
[1:39:36] barrier
[1:39:37] but
[1:39:37] even
[1:39:37] those
[1:39:38] who
[1:39:38] have
[1:39:38] difficulty
[1:39:39] expressing
[1:39:41] themselves
[1:39:41] through
[1:39:41] a
[1:39:42] spoken
[1:39:43] language
[1:39:44] no
[1:39:44] yes
[1:39:45] one
[1:39:47] last
[1:39:47] point
[1:39:47] magpapatawag
[1:39:48] po yata
[1:39:49] na special
[1:39:49] session
[1:39:50] ng Pangulong
[1:39:50] BBM
[1:39:51] sa
[1:39:51] June 17
[1:39:52] any
[1:39:52] comment
[1:39:53] any
[1:39:54] reaction
[1:39:54] well
[1:39:58] we
[1:39:59] understand
[1:39:59] that
[1:39:59] the
[1:40:00] purpose
[1:40:00] of
[1:40:00] the
[1:40:00] palace
[1:40:01] is
[1:40:01] to
[1:40:02] give
[1:40:04] opportunity
[1:40:04] to
[1:40:05] the
[1:40:05] senate
[1:40:05] to
[1:40:06] finish
[1:40:07] the
[1:40:07] priority
[1:40:08] measures
[1:40:08] which
[1:40:09] Kong
[1:40:09] Zia
[1:40:09] mentioned
[1:40:10] already
[1:40:10] the
[1:40:11] LEDAC
[1:40:11] measures
[1:40:12] I can
[1:40:13] state
[1:40:14] for the
[1:40:14] record
[1:40:14] that
[1:40:15] I
[1:40:17] approve
[1:40:18] on
[1:40:18] third
[1:40:19] reading
[1:40:19] transmitted
[1:40:21] to
[1:40:21] the
[1:40:22] Senate
[1:40:24] so
[1:40:25] for
[1:40:25] that
[1:40:25] to
[1:40:26] be
[1:40:26] able
[1:40:26] to
[1:40:27] become
[1:40:27] laws
[1:40:28] by way
[1:40:28] of
[1:40:28] action
[1:40:29] of
[1:40:29] the
[1:40:29] executive
[1:40:30] or
[1:40:30] the
[1:40:30] president
[1:40:30] dapat
[1:40:31] gumalaw
[1:40:32] din
[1:40:32] senado
[1:40:32] so
[1:40:33] that's
[1:40:34] what
[1:40:34] I
[1:40:34] read
[1:40:34] from
[1:40:35] the
[1:40:35] notice
[1:40:35] of
[1:40:36] the
[1:40:36] office
[1:40:36] of
[1:40:37] the
[1:40:37] president
[1:40:37] about
[1:40:38] this
[1:40:39] special
[1:40:39] session
[1:40:40] to be
[1:40:40] held
[1:40:40] on
[1:40:41] June
[1:40:43] 17
[1:40:44] now
[1:40:44] now
[1:40:45] with
[1:40:45] regards
[1:40:45] to
[1:40:46] the
[1:40:46] issue
[1:40:46] on
[1:40:46] leadership
[1:40:47] this
[1:40:48] is
[1:40:48] just
[1:40:48] our
[1:40:49] opinion
[1:40:51] that
[1:40:52] sana
[1:40:52] they
[1:40:53] take
[1:40:53] advantage
[1:40:53] of
[1:40:54] that
[1:40:54] special
[1:40:54] session
[1:40:55] to
[1:40:55] address
[1:40:56] what
[1:40:56] needs
[1:40:56] to
[1:40:56] be
[1:40:56] addressed
[1:40:57] to
[1:40:57] fix
[1:40:58] what
[1:40:58] needs
[1:40:58] to
[1:40:58] be
[1:40:59] fixed
[1:40:59] and
[1:41:00] ultimately
[1:41:00] to
[1:41:01] have
[1:41:01] a
[1:41:01] duly
[1:41:01] elected
[1:41:02] senate
[1:41:03] president
[1:41:03] thank you
[1:41:07] really
[1:41:07] marian
[1:41:08] enriquez
[1:41:08] from
[1:41:09] tb5
[1:41:10] ma'am
[1:41:13] para
[1:41:14] sa inyo
[1:41:14] kasi po
[1:41:16] you were
[1:41:17] saying
[1:41:18] yung
[1:41:18] gusot po
[1:41:19] sa senate
[1:41:19] kung
[1:41:19] adion
[1:41:19] was
[1:41:20] saying
[1:41:20] that's
[1:41:20] entirely
[1:41:20] for
[1:41:21] the
[1:41:21] senate
[1:41:21] to
[1:41:21] decide
[1:41:21] kung
[1:41:22] loistro
[1:41:22] said
[1:41:22] we can
[1:41:23] only
[1:41:23] hope
[1:41:24] and
[1:41:24] pray
[1:41:25] but
[1:41:25] you've
[1:41:26] already
[1:41:27] emphasized
[1:41:28] several
[1:41:28] times
[1:41:29] po
[1:41:29] yung
[1:41:29] significance
[1:41:29] ng
[1:41:30] constitutional
[1:41:30] mandate
[1:41:31] ng
[1:41:32] senado
[1:41:32] and
[1:41:33] you
[1:41:33] also
[1:41:33] mentioned
[1:41:34] earlier
[1:41:34] na
[1:41:34] you
[1:41:35] hope
[1:41:35] magkaroon
[1:41:35] na
[1:41:36] sana
[1:41:36] ng
[1:41:36] julie
[1:41:36] elected
[1:41:36] senate
[1:41:37] president
[1:41:37] kasi
[1:41:38] the
[1:41:38] reason
[1:41:39] we
[1:41:39] are
[1:41:40] apprehensive
[1:41:40] we
[1:41:40] might
[1:41:41] encounter
[1:41:41] another
[1:41:41] constitutional
[1:41:42] issue
[1:41:43] we
[1:41:43] will
[1:41:43] be
[1:41:43] starting
[1:41:44] the
[1:41:44] trial
[1:41:44] and
[1:41:44] there
[1:41:45] is
[1:41:45] no
[1:41:45] julie
[1:41:45] elected
[1:41:46] senate
[1:41:46] president
[1:41:46] so
[1:41:47] gaano
[1:41:47] po
[1:41:47] baka
[1:41:48] importante
[1:41:49] na
[1:41:49] hindi
[1:41:49] lang
[1:41:50] po
[1:41:50] we
[1:41:50] you
[1:41:51] know
[1:41:51] it's
[1:41:52] up for
[1:41:52] the
[1:41:52] senate
[1:41:52] na
[1:41:53] dapat
[1:41:53] iprioritize
[1:41:54] po
[1:41:54] nila
[1:41:55] yung
[1:41:55] page-elect
[1:41:55] ng
[1:41:56] julie
[1:41:56] elected
[1:41:56] senate
[1:41:57] president
[1:41:57] before
[1:41:58] even
[1:41:59] yung
[1:41:59] pre-trial
[1:42:00] po
[1:42:00] ay mag-umpisa
[1:42:00] The
[1:42:01] reason
[1:42:02] why
[1:42:03] we
[1:42:04] are
[1:42:04] only
[1:42:05] expressing
[1:42:06] our
[1:42:06] position
[1:42:06] on the
[1:42:07] matter
[1:42:07] is
[1:42:08] because
[1:42:11] the
[1:42:13] senate
[1:42:14] matters
[1:42:14] concerning
[1:42:15] the
[1:42:15] power
[1:42:16] which
[1:42:16] is
[1:42:16] exclusive
[1:42:17] to
[1:42:17] the
[1:42:18] senate
[1:42:18] so
[1:42:19] long
[1:42:19] as
[1:42:20] there
[1:42:20] is
[1:42:20] no
[1:42:20] issue
[1:42:21] of
[1:42:21] grave
[1:42:21] abuse
[1:42:22] of
[1:42:22] discretion
[1:42:23] and
[1:42:23] lack
[1:42:24] of
[1:42:24] jurisdiction
[1:42:25] is
[1:42:25] a
[1:42:25] non-justiciable
[1:42:27] issue
[1:42:27] kung
[1:42:28] non-justiciable
[1:42:29] siya
[1:42:30] hindi
[1:42:30] pwedeng
[1:42:31] pakialman
[1:42:32] ng
[1:42:32] supreme
[1:42:32] court
[1:42:33] lalo
[1:42:33] na
[1:42:34] hindi
[1:42:34] namin
[1:42:34] pwedeng
[1:42:35] pakialaman
[1:42:36] this
[1:42:37] falls
[1:42:37] within
[1:42:37] the
[1:42:38] exclusive
[1:42:38] purview
[1:42:39] of
[1:42:40] the
[1:42:40] philippine
[1:42:41] senate
[1:42:42] that's
[1:42:42] why
[1:42:43] ang
[1:42:43] kaya
[1:42:43] lang
[1:42:44] namin
[1:42:44] gawin
[1:42:44] is
[1:42:45] to
[1:42:45] express
[1:42:46] our
[1:42:46] position
[1:42:47] about
[1:42:47] what
[1:42:48] I
[1:42:49] perceived
[1:42:49] as
[1:42:50] irregularities
[1:42:51] happening
[1:42:52] in the
[1:42:53] senate
[1:42:54] now
[1:42:54] now
[1:42:55] you're
[1:42:55] asking
[1:42:55] how
[1:42:55] important
[1:42:56] is
[1:42:56] this
[1:42:57] this
[1:42:58] is
[1:42:58] important
[1:42:58] because
[1:43:00] impeachment
[1:43:01] trial
[1:43:02] is a
[1:43:02] constitutional
[1:43:03] mandate
[1:43:04] we have
[1:43:05] witnessed
[1:43:05] already
[1:43:06] what
[1:43:06] happened
[1:43:07] in the
[1:43:07] first
[1:43:07] impeachment
[1:43:08] that
[1:43:09] was
[1:43:09] during
[1:43:10] the
[1:43:10] 19
[1:43:10] congress
[1:43:11] while
[1:43:12] almost
[1:43:12] all
[1:43:13] the
[1:43:13] members
[1:43:13] of
[1:43:14] the
[1:43:14] house
[1:43:15] of
[1:43:15] representatives
[1:43:16] are
[1:43:16] of
[1:43:17] the
[1:43:17] opinion
[1:43:17] that
[1:43:18] the
[1:43:18] process
[1:43:19] was
[1:43:19] legal
[1:43:19] valid
[1:43:20] legitimate
[1:43:21] but
[1:43:22] nonetheless
[1:43:23] it
[1:43:24] went
[1:43:25] on
[1:43:26] with
[1:43:26] the
[1:43:27] supreme
[1:43:27] court
[1:43:27] declaring
[1:43:28] its
[1:43:29] unconstitutionality
[1:43:30] no
[1:43:31] and it
[1:43:32] is because
[1:43:32] of
[1:43:33] issues
[1:43:33] like
[1:43:34] the
[1:43:35] lack
[1:43:35] of
[1:43:35] notice
[1:43:36] and
[1:43:36] hearing
[1:43:36] before
[1:43:38] transmitting
[1:43:39] the
[1:43:39] articles
[1:43:41] of
[1:43:41] impeachment
[1:43:41] to
[1:43:42] senate
[1:43:42] which
[1:43:43] is
[1:43:43] not
[1:43:44] even
[1:43:44] mentioned
[1:43:45] in
[1:43:45] the
[1:43:45] rules
[1:43:46] of
[1:43:46] impeachment
[1:43:46] of
[1:43:47] the
[1:43:47] house
[1:43:47] of
[1:43:47] representatives
[1:43:48] neither
[1:43:49] in
[1:43:50] the
[1:43:50] constitution
[1:43:50] and
[1:43:51] yet
[1:43:52] because
[1:43:52] of
[1:43:53] due
[1:43:53] process
[1:43:53] the
[1:43:54] supreme
[1:43:55] court
[1:43:55] resolved
[1:43:55] that
[1:43:56] the
[1:43:57] articles
[1:43:57] of
[1:43:58] impeachment
[1:43:58] and
[1:43:58] the
[1:43:59] proceeding
[1:43:59] are
[1:43:59] unconstitutional
[1:44:00] now
[1:44:01] we will
[1:44:03] be
[1:44:03] proceeding
[1:44:04] to
[1:44:04] the
[1:44:04] schedule
[1:44:05] of
[1:44:05] our
[1:44:06] impeachment
[1:44:06] trial
[1:44:07] we
[1:44:08] understand
[1:44:08] that
[1:44:09] the
[1:44:10] head
[1:44:10] of
[1:44:10] the
[1:44:10] senate
[1:44:10] is
[1:44:11] a
[1:44:11] senate
[1:44:11] president
[1:44:12] and
[1:44:13] based
[1:44:14] on
[1:44:15] the
[1:44:15] rules
[1:44:15] if
[1:44:16] the
[1:44:17] impeachable
[1:44:18] official
[1:44:18] is
[1:44:19] not
[1:44:19] the
[1:44:19] president
[1:44:20] they
[1:44:21] are
[1:44:21] the
[1:44:21] presiding
[1:44:21] officer
[1:44:22] that
[1:44:23] is
[1:44:23] before
[1:44:24] the
[1:44:25] current
[1:44:25] leadership
[1:44:26] changed
[1:44:28] that
[1:44:28] into
[1:44:29] allowing
[1:44:29] the
[1:44:30] senate
[1:44:30] to
[1:44:30] elect
[1:44:31] a
[1:44:31] presiding
[1:44:32] officer
[1:44:32] other
[1:44:33] than
[1:44:33] the
[1:44:34] senate
[1:44:35] president
[1:44:35] no
[1:44:36] which
[1:44:36] means
[1:44:37] that
[1:44:37] this
[1:44:37] is
[1:44:37] a
[1:44:38] very
[1:44:38] significant
[1:44:38] position
[1:44:39] in
[1:44:40] as
[1:44:40] far
[1:44:40] as
[1:44:40] impeachment
[1:44:41] trial
[1:44:41] is
[1:44:42] concerned
[1:44:42] while
[1:44:43] we
[1:44:44] duly
[1:44:44] recognize
[1:44:45] the
[1:44:45] legitimacy
[1:44:45] of
[1:44:46] the
[1:44:46] current
[1:44:46] leadership
[1:44:47] because
[1:44:48] of
[1:44:48] the
[1:44:49] sanctity
[1:44:50] solemnity
[1:44:52] and
[1:44:53] sensitivity
[1:44:53] of
[1:44:54] this
[1:44:55] impeachment
[1:44:56] trial
[1:44:56] it
[1:44:57] is
[1:44:57] best
[1:44:58] that
[1:44:59] we
[1:44:59] address
[1:45:00] that
[1:45:01] need
[1:45:02] of
[1:45:02] electing
[1:45:03] a
[1:45:04] senate
[1:45:04] president
[1:45:04] before
[1:45:06] we
[1:45:06] actually
[1:45:06] start
[1:45:07] but
[1:45:07] nevertheless
[1:45:08] let me
[1:45:08] stay
[1:45:08] for
[1:45:08] the
[1:45:09] record
[1:45:09] as
[1:45:09] well
[1:45:09] we
[1:45:10] are
[1:45:10] submitting
[1:45:11] to
[1:45:11] the
[1:45:11] jurisdiction
[1:45:11] and
[1:45:12] authority
[1:45:12] of
[1:45:13] the
[1:45:14] impeachment
[1:45:14] court
[1:45:14] if
[1:45:15] they
[1:45:15] refuse
[1:45:16] to
[1:45:16] elect
[1:45:16] and
[1:45:17] they
[1:45:17] proceed
[1:45:18] to
[1:45:18] having
[1:45:19] the
[1:45:19] trial
[1:45:20] we
[1:45:21] will
[1:45:21] appear
[1:45:21] and
[1:45:22] do
[1:45:22] our
[1:45:23] mandate
[1:45:23] of
[1:45:23] presenting
[1:45:24] the
[1:45:24] evidence
[1:45:25] in
[1:45:25] behalf
[1:45:25] of
[1:45:25] the
[1:45:25] institution
[1:45:26] so
[1:45:27] just
[1:45:27] for
[1:45:27] the
[1:45:27] record
[1:45:27] the
[1:45:28] prosecution
[1:45:28] believe
[1:45:29] that
[1:45:30] the
[1:45:31] Senate
[1:45:32] should
[1:45:34] prioritize
[1:45:34] electing
[1:45:35] a
[1:45:35] duly
[1:45:35] elected
[1:45:35] Senate
[1:45:36] president
[1:45:36] yes
[1:45:37] so
[1:45:37] when you
[1:45:37] see
[1:45:38] here
[1:45:38] the
[1:45:39] House
[1:45:40] of
[1:45:40] Representatives
[1:45:41] they
[1:45:43] raised
[1:45:43] as an
[1:45:43] issue
[1:45:44] the
[1:45:45] referral
[1:45:45] from
[1:45:46] plenary
[1:45:46] to
[1:45:47] justice
[1:45:47] committee
[1:45:49] they
[1:45:49] even
[1:45:50] raised
[1:45:50] violation
[1:45:51] of
[1:45:51] one
[1:45:51] year
[1:45:52] bar
[1:45:52] rule
[1:45:52] what
[1:45:54] else
[1:45:54] did
[1:45:55] they
[1:45:55] raise
[1:45:55] they
[1:45:56] raised
[1:45:56] as
[1:45:56] well
[1:45:56] that
[1:45:57] we
[1:45:57] have
[1:45:57] predetermined
[1:45:58] the
[1:45:59] impeachment
[1:45:59] complaints
[1:46:00] even
[1:46:00] before
[1:46:01] the
[1:46:01] clarificatory
[1:46:03] hearing
[1:46:03] in the
[1:46:04] in the
[1:46:05] justice
[1:46:05] committee
[1:46:06] they're
[1:46:06] also
[1:46:07] invoking
[1:46:08] the
[1:46:08] confidentiality
[1:46:10] in their
[1:46:10] allegation
[1:46:11] that we
[1:46:11] violated
[1:46:12] the
[1:46:12] confidentiality
[1:46:13] provision
[1:46:14] of
[1:46:14] AMLOC
[1:46:15] in spite
[1:46:15] of the
[1:46:16] clear
[1:46:16] exception
[1:46:17] in the
[1:46:17] bank
[1:46:18] secrecy
[1:46:18] law
[1:46:18] and the
[1:46:19] fact
[1:46:19] that the
[1:46:19] subject
[1:46:19] matter
[1:46:20] of the
[1:46:20] AMLOC
[1:46:20] report
[1:46:21] are
[1:46:21] bank
[1:46:21] reports
[1:46:22] so
[1:46:24] what
[1:46:24] else
[1:46:25] will
[1:46:26] they
[1:46:26] not
[1:46:26] elevate
[1:46:27] to the
[1:46:27] Supreme
[1:46:28] Court
[1:46:28] we
[1:46:29] have
[1:46:33] anticipation
[1:46:35] we
[1:46:36] have
[1:46:36] basis
[1:46:37] to
[1:46:37] believe
[1:46:37] that
[1:46:38] even
[1:46:38] the
[1:46:39] irregularity
[1:46:39] in
[1:46:39] the
[1:46:40] leadership
[1:46:40] may
[1:46:41] be
[1:46:41] considered
[1:46:42] by
[1:46:42] the
[1:46:42] defense
[1:46:43] in
[1:46:43] elevating
[1:46:44] another
[1:46:44] constitutional
[1:46:45] question
[1:46:45] before
[1:46:46] the
[1:46:46] Supreme
[1:46:46] Court
[1:46:47] while
[1:46:57] the
[1:46:57] Avelino
[1:46:58] doctrine
[1:46:59] non-justiciable
[1:47:00] it
[1:47:01] but
[1:47:02] considering
[1:47:02] that
[1:47:03] there
[1:47:03] is
[1:47:03] an
[1:47:03] express
[1:47:04] provision
[1:47:04] in
[1:47:04] the
[1:47:05] Constitution
[1:47:05] two-thirds
[1:47:06] of all
[1:47:07] I think
[1:47:08] this
[1:47:08] time
[1:47:08] when
[1:47:09] we
[1:47:09] interpret
[1:47:09] the
[1:47:10] threshold
[1:47:10] for
[1:47:10] the
[1:47:10] purpose
[1:47:11] of
[1:47:11] conviction
[1:47:11] I
[1:47:12] think
[1:47:12] I
[1:47:12] think
[1:47:12] that
[1:47:12] the
[1:47:14] Supreme
[1:47:14] Court
[1:47:14] for
[1:47:16] electing
[1:47:16] a
[1:47:17] Senate
[1:47:17] president
[1:47:17] for
[1:47:19] electing
[1:47:20] a
[1:47:20] Senate
[1:47:20] president
[1:47:21] the
[1:47:21] Avelino
[1:47:21] doctrine
[1:47:22] should
[1:47:22] apply
[1:47:22] also
[1:47:23] because
[1:47:25] in
[1:47:25] determining
[1:47:26] the
[1:47:26] threshold
[1:47:27] we
[1:47:27] must
[1:47:27] first
[1:47:28] determine
[1:47:28] the
[1:47:29] number
[1:47:29] of
[1:47:30] members
[1:47:31] of
[1:47:32] the
[1:47:32] Senate
[1:47:32] who
[1:47:32] are
[1:47:32] within
[1:47:33] the
[1:47:33] coercive
[1:47:34] means
[1:47:34] of
[1:47:35] the
[1:47:35] institution
[1:47:36] So
[1:47:37] when
[1:47:38] our
[1:47:39] determination
[1:47:40] of
[1:47:41] number
[1:47:41] within
[1:47:41] the
[1:47:42] coercive
[1:47:42] means
[1:47:42] it
[1:47:43] will
[1:47:43] be
[1:47:43] a
[1:47:43] quorum
[1:47:44] and
[1:47:44] threshold
[1:47:45] Just
[1:47:47] in
[1:47:48] addition
[1:47:48] to
[1:47:48] that
[1:47:48] I
[1:47:49] think
[1:47:49] this
[1:47:50] is
[1:47:50] how
[1:47:50] I
[1:47:50] surmise
[1:47:51] the
[1:47:51] explanation
[1:47:52] of
[1:47:52] our
[1:47:52] lead
[1:47:53] counsel
[1:47:54] Congresswoman
[1:47:55] Jinkie
[1:47:56] I
[1:47:56] think
[1:47:56] it's
[1:47:57] to
[1:47:57] the
[1:47:57] advantage
[1:47:57] of
[1:47:58] the
[1:47:58] Senate
[1:47:58] if
[1:47:59] for
[1:48:00] the
[1:48:00] practical
[1:48:00] purposes
[1:48:01] they
[1:48:01] have
[1:48:01] already
[1:48:02] settled
[1:48:02] the
[1:48:02] issue
[1:48:02] of
[1:48:02] leadership
[1:48:03] because
[1:48:04] what
[1:48:04] we
[1:48:04] anticipate
[1:48:05] probably
[1:48:06] and
[1:48:06] this
[1:48:06] has
[1:48:06] been
[1:48:07] asked
[1:48:07] to
[1:48:08] Congresswoman
[1:48:10] Jinkie
[1:48:10] earlier
[1:48:11] we
[1:48:11] anticipate
[1:48:12] that
[1:48:12] there
[1:48:12] will
[1:48:12] be
[1:48:12] technicalities
[1:48:13] that
[1:48:14] they
[1:48:14] may
[1:48:14] use
[1:48:15] in
[1:48:15] order
[1:48:15] to
[1:48:16] probably
[1:48:16] delay
[1:48:17] the
[1:48:17] most
[1:48:17] important
[1:48:18] constitutionally
[1:48:20] mandated
[1:48:20] job
[1:48:21] of
[1:48:21] the
[1:48:21] Senate
[1:48:21] now
[1:48:22] which
[1:48:22] is
[1:48:22] to
[1:48:22] proceed
[1:48:23] with
[1:48:23] impeachment
[1:48:23] trial
[1:48:24] so
[1:48:25] they
[1:48:25] will
[1:48:25] probably
[1:48:26] those
[1:48:26] who
[1:48:26] are
[1:48:26] opposed
[1:48:27] to
[1:48:27] the
[1:48:27] impeachment
[1:48:28] trial
[1:48:28] might
[1:48:29] probably
[1:48:29] use
[1:48:31] all
[1:48:32] possible
[1:48:32] means
[1:48:33] in
[1:48:33] order
[1:48:33] to
[1:48:33] delay
[1:48:34] that
[1:48:34] and
[1:48:34] one
[1:48:34] of
[1:48:34] which
[1:48:35] as
[1:48:35] we
[1:48:35] have
[1:48:35] seen
[1:48:36] in
[1:48:36] this
[1:48:37] development
[1:48:38] when it
[1:48:39] comes to
[1:48:40] Senate
[1:48:40] leadership
[1:48:40] questioning
[1:48:41] the
[1:48:41] technicality
[1:48:42] or
[1:48:43] the
[1:48:43] legitimacy
[1:48:43] of
[1:48:44] the
[1:48:44] acting
[1:48:44] Senate
[1:48:44] president
[1:48:45] so
[1:48:46] we
[1:48:46] want
[1:48:46] to
[1:48:46] resolve
[1:48:47] not
[1:48:47] just
[1:48:47] for
[1:48:47] the
[1:48:48] House
[1:48:48] prosecution
[1:48:48] team
[1:48:49] not
[1:48:49] just
[1:48:50] for
[1:48:50] the
[1:48:50] entire
[1:48:50] Filipino
[1:48:51] nation
[1:48:51] for
[1:48:52] the
[1:48:52] impeachment
[1:48:53] trial
[1:48:53] to
[1:48:53] proceed
[1:48:54] but
[1:48:54] for
[1:48:54] the
[1:48:55] practical
[1:48:55] sense
[1:48:55] that
[1:48:56] the
[1:48:56] Senate
[1:48:56] has
[1:48:56] already
[1:48:57] resolved
[1:48:57] the
[1:48:57] issue
[1:48:58] of
[1:48:58] leadership
[1:48:58] thank
[1:49:03] let
[1:49:04] let
[1:49:04] us
[1:49:04] recognize
[1:49:05] pb
[1:49:07] and
[1:49:07] gulia
[1:49:07] from
[1:49:08] channel
[1:49:09] two
[1:49:09] good
[1:49:11] after
[1:49:11] clarification
[1:49:13] balik
[1:49:14] po
[1:49:14] dito
[1:49:14] sa
[1:49:15] isasamit
[1:49:15] po
[1:49:15] ninyo
[1:49:16] pre
[1:49:16] trial
[1:49:16] briefs
[1:49:17] today
[1:49:17] you
[1:49:18] mentioned
[1:49:18] over
[1:49:19] 30
[1:49:19] witnesses
[1:49:20] is
[1:49:21] it
[1:49:21] less
[1:49:22] than
[1:49:22] 40
[1:49:22] ilan
[1:49:23] po
[1:49:23] dito
[1:49:23] yung
[1:49:23] hostel
[1:49:24] witnesses
[1:49:24] if
[1:49:26] you
[1:49:26] can
[1:49:26] provide
[1:49:27] us
[1:49:27] by
[1:49:27] over
[1:49:28] 30
[1:49:28] any
[1:49:29] number
[1:49:29] beyond
[1:49:30] 30
[1:49:30] you
[1:49:36] will
[1:49:36] know
[1:49:36] you
[1:49:40] can
[1:49:40] anticipate
[1:49:41] already
[1:49:42] that
[1:49:42] this
[1:49:42] will
[1:49:42] be
[1:49:43] officials
[1:49:43] either
[1:49:43] from
[1:49:44] OVP
[1:49:45] or
[1:49:46] DepEd
[1:49:46] I
[1:49:48] think
[1:49:48] most
[1:49:48] of
[1:49:48] them
[1:49:49] you've
[1:49:49] seen
[1:49:49] already
[1:49:50] in
[1:49:50] the
[1:49:51] inquiry
[1:49:51] and
[1:49:52] aid
[1:49:52] of
[1:49:52] legislation
[1:49:53] by
[1:49:54] the
[1:49:54] Committee
[1:49:54] on
[1:49:54] Good
[1:49:54] Government
[1:49:55] and
[1:49:55] Public
[1:49:55] Accountability
[1:49:56] then
[1:49:57] presided
[1:49:57] by
[1:49:58] Chair
[1:49:58] Joel
[1:49:59] Chua
[1:49:59] back
[1:49:59] in
[1:50:00] 19
[1:50:00] Congress
[1:50:01] and
[1:50:02] then
[1:50:02] doon
[1:50:02] sa
[1:50:03] order
[1:50:03] of
[1:50:03] presentation
[1:50:04] for
[1:50:05] sound
[1:50:06] by
[1:50:06] purposes
[1:50:06] lang
[1:50:06] po
[1:50:07] ano
[1:50:07] yung
[1:50:07] basis
[1:50:08] po
[1:50:08] ninyo
[1:50:08] for
[1:50:08] that
[1:50:09] order
[1:50:09] of
[1:50:09] presentation
[1:50:10] na
[1:50:10] nilagay
[1:50:11] po
[1:50:12] ninyo
[1:50:12] sa
[1:50:12] pre-trial
[1:50:13] brief
[1:50:13] well
[1:50:17] our
[1:50:18] consideration
[1:50:19] is
[1:50:19] one
[1:50:20] is
[1:50:20] yung
[1:50:20] interest
[1:50:21] ng
[1:50:21] mga
[1:50:21] tao
[1:50:22] that's
[1:50:23] one
[1:50:23] diba
[1:50:24] two
[1:50:26] yung
[1:50:27] dami
[1:50:27] ng
[1:50:27] ebidensya
[1:50:28] and
[1:50:30] three
[1:50:30] yung
[1:50:31] significance
[1:50:32] sa
[1:50:33] ating
[1:50:33] national
[1:50:35] government
[1:50:35] but
[1:50:38] safe
[1:50:38] to
[1:50:38] say
[1:50:38] hindi yung
[1:50:39] order
[1:50:39] na
[1:50:40] article
[1:50:40] one
[1:50:41] not
[1:50:41] necessarily
[1:50:42] sa ating
[1:50:44] articles
[1:50:44] of
[1:50:44] impeachment
[1:50:45] our
[1:50:46] article
[1:50:46] one
[1:50:47] is
[1:50:47] confidential
[1:50:48] fund
[1:50:48] article
[1:50:50] two
[1:50:51] is
[1:50:52] unexplained
[1:50:52] wealth
[1:50:53] article
[1:50:54] three
[1:50:55] is
[1:50:55] bribery
[1:50:55] and
[1:50:56] article
[1:50:57] four
[1:50:57] is
[1:50:58] threat
[1:50:58] definitely
[1:51:00] the
[1:51:01] presentation
[1:51:01] will be
[1:51:02] different
[1:51:02] and
[1:51:04] and
[1:51:04] and
[1:51:05] then
[1:51:05] you
[1:51:06] mentioned
[1:51:06] canina
[1:51:07] that
[1:51:07] the
[1:51:07] Avelino
[1:51:08] the
[1:51:08] SC
[1:51:09] decision
[1:51:10] on
[1:51:10] the
[1:51:10] Avelino
[1:51:10] case
[1:51:11] should
[1:51:11] also
[1:51:11] apply
[1:51:12] in
[1:51:12] the
[1:51:12] threshold
[1:51:12] for
[1:51:12] a
[1:51:13] conviction
[1:51:13] will
[1:51:14] the
[1:51:14] prosecution
[1:51:15] make
[1:51:15] that
[1:51:15] motion
[1:51:16] before
[1:51:16] the
[1:51:16] impeachment
[1:51:17] we
[1:51:17] will
[1:51:17] have
[1:51:17] to
[1:51:18] talk
[1:51:18] about
[1:51:18] that
[1:51:18] no
[1:51:19] hindi
[1:51:19] pa
[1:51:20] namin
[1:51:20] nagpag-usapan
[1:51:21] yan
[1:51:22] as a
[1:51:22] team
[1:51:22] although
[1:51:23] I
[1:51:23] understand
[1:51:24] if
[1:51:24] when
[1:51:25] I
[1:51:25] am
[1:51:25] watching
[1:51:25] their
[1:51:26] interviews
[1:51:26] it
[1:51:26] seems
[1:51:27] to
[1:51:27] me
[1:51:27] that
[1:51:28] the
[1:51:29] team
[1:51:29] shares
[1:51:29] the
[1:51:29] same
[1:51:30] opinion
[1:51:30] but
[1:51:32] are
[1:51:32] you
[1:51:33] open
[1:51:33] to
[1:51:33] it
[1:51:33] yes
[1:51:34] we
[1:51:34] can
[1:51:35] definitely
[1:51:35] discuss
[1:51:36] it
[1:51:36] among
[1:51:37] ourselves
[1:51:37] and
[1:51:38] perhaps
[1:51:38] come up
[1:51:39] with
[1:51:39] our
[1:51:39] one
[1:51:40] position
[1:51:40] with
[1:51:41] respect
[1:51:41] to
[1:51:42] the
[1:51:42] question
[1:51:43] and
[1:51:43] threshold
[1:51:43] for
[1:51:44] the
[1:51:44] purpose
[1:51:44] of
[1:51:44] conviction
[1:51:45] and
[1:51:46] on
[1:51:49] what
[1:51:56] can
[1:51:56] you
[1:51:56] say
[1:51:56] about
[1:51:57] that
[1:51:57] I
[1:51:59] know
[1:51:59] even
[1:51:59] before
[1:52:00] this
[1:52:00] impeachment
[1:52:01] trial
[1:52:01] members
[1:52:03] of
[1:52:03] the
[1:52:03] then
[1:52:04] majority
[1:52:04] now
[1:52:05] minority
[1:52:06] really
[1:52:07] have
[1:52:07] issues
[1:52:08] concerning
[1:52:10] graph
[1:52:11] and
[1:52:11] corruption
[1:52:12] or
[1:52:12] plunder
[1:52:13] so
[1:52:14] I
[1:52:15] do
[1:52:15] not
[1:52:15] subscribe
[1:52:16] to
[1:52:16] the
[1:52:17] belief
[1:52:18] that
[1:52:18] the
[1:52:19] reason
[1:52:19] why
[1:52:19] there
[1:52:20] are
[1:52:20] fighting
[1:52:20] of
[1:52:20] cases
[1:52:21] is
[1:52:21] because
[1:52:21] of
[1:52:21] impeachment
[1:52:22] because
[1:52:23] the
[1:52:23] truth
[1:52:23] of
[1:52:23] the
[1:52:24] matter
[1:52:24] is
[1:52:24] there
[1:52:25] are
[1:52:25] cases
[1:52:25] before
[1:52:27] the
[1:52:27] impeachment
[1:52:28] it
[1:52:28] how
[1:52:30] about
[1:52:30] on
[1:52:31] the
[1:52:31] perception
[1:52:31] that
[1:52:31] the
[1:52:32] Avelino
[1:52:32] case
[1:52:32] refers
[1:52:34] to
[1:52:34] the
[1:52:35] legislative
[1:52:36] functions
[1:52:37] of
[1:52:37] the
[1:52:37] Senate
[1:52:37] and
[1:52:38] this
[1:52:38] is
[1:52:38] impeachment
[1:52:39] trial
[1:52:39] so
[1:52:39] so
[1:52:40] we
[1:52:40] generis
[1:52:40] as
[1:52:41] we
[1:52:41] have
[1:52:41] always
[1:52:41] mentioned
[1:52:42] well
[1:52:43] if
[1:52:43] it
[1:52:44] will
[1:52:46] be
[1:52:46] considered
[1:52:46] as
[1:52:47] function
[1:52:48] of
[1:52:48] the
[1:52:49] Senate
[1:52:49] which
[1:52:49] means
[1:52:50] it
[1:52:50] is
[1:52:51] it
[1:52:52] falls
[1:52:52] within
[1:52:53] the purview
[1:52:53] of
[1:52:53] their
[1:52:54] exclusive
[1:52:55] prerogative
[1:52:55] it only
[1:52:56] means that
[1:52:57] it will be
[1:52:58] interpreted
[1:52:58] among
[1:52:59] themselves
[1:52:59] whether
[1:53:00] the
[1:53:00] Avelino
[1:53:01] doctrine
[1:53:01] will be
[1:53:02] applied
[1:53:02] as well
[1:53:03] in the
[1:53:03] threshold
[1:53:03] for the
[1:53:04] purpose
[1:53:04] of
[1:53:04] conviction
[1:53:05] should
[1:53:06] they
[1:53:07] resolve
[1:53:08] the
[1:53:09] same way
[1:53:09] that
[1:53:09] the
[1:53:09] issue
[1:53:10] of
[1:53:10] leadership
[1:53:11] is
[1:53:11] not
[1:53:12] allowed
[1:53:12] the
[1:53:12] Supreme
[1:53:13] Court
[1:53:13] because
[1:53:13] that
[1:53:13] is
[1:53:14] a
[1:53:14] doctrine
[1:53:14] of
[1:53:15] political
[1:53:15] question
[1:53:16] but
[1:53:17] this is
[1:53:18] very
[1:53:18] significant
[1:53:19] so
[1:53:20] this is
[1:53:22] just
[1:53:23] my
[1:53:23] position
[1:53:24] I
[1:53:24] hope
[1:53:24] that
[1:53:25] the
[1:53:27] Supreme
[1:53:28] Court
[1:53:28] will
[1:53:28] enlighten
[1:53:29] the
[1:53:29] Senado
[1:53:30] about
[1:53:30] that
[1:53:30] I
[1:53:31] think
[1:53:31] I
[1:53:31] think
[1:53:31] I
[1:53:31] think
[1:53:32] I
[1:53:33] think
[1:53:35] isa
[1:53:37] sa
[1:53:37] magandang
[1:53:38] dulot
[1:53:39] ng
[1:53:40] pagiging
[1:53:40] House
[1:53:41] prosecution
[1:53:42] part
[1:53:42] ng
[1:53:42] comms
[1:53:43] team
[1:53:43] is
[1:53:43] that
[1:53:43] I
[1:53:43] started
[1:53:44] also
[1:53:44] to
[1:53:44] research
[1:53:45] I
[1:53:46] think
[1:53:46] mayroon
[1:53:46] nang
[1:53:46] ruling
[1:53:48] at
[1:53:48] Supreme
[1:53:48] Court
[1:53:49] yung
[1:53:49] people
[1:53:50] versus
[1:53:51] halos
[1:53:51] host
[1:53:51] yes
[1:53:53] although
[1:53:55] these
[1:53:55] are
[1:53:56] applicable
[1:53:56] on
[1:53:57] the
[1:53:58] Senate
[1:53:58] functioning
[1:53:59] as a
[1:53:59] legislative
[1:53:59] body
[1:54:00] they
[1:54:01] can
[1:54:01] propose
[1:54:02] actually
[1:54:02] but
[1:54:03] they
[1:54:03] cannot
[1:54:03] vote
[1:54:03] but
[1:54:04] when
[1:54:04] it
[1:54:04] comes
[1:54:04] to
[1:54:05] the
[1:54:05] actual
[1:54:05] impeachment
[1:54:06] trial
[1:54:06] let's
[1:54:06] again
[1:54:07] go
[1:54:07] back
[1:54:07] to
[1:54:07] the
[1:54:07] issue
[1:54:08] of
[1:54:08] the
[1:54:08] indispensability
[1:54:10] of the
[1:54:11] presence
[1:54:11] of a
[1:54:11] sitting
[1:54:12] senator
[1:54:12] judge
[1:54:12] so
[1:54:13] yun
[1:54:13] ang
[1:54:13] premise
[1:54:14] namin
[1:54:15] papano
[1:54:15] ka
[1:54:16] huhusga
[1:54:17] sa isang
[1:54:17] bagay
[1:54:17] na
[1:54:18] hindi
[1:54:18] mo
[1:54:18] nakita
[1:54:19] hindi
[1:54:19] mo
[1:54:19] narinig
[1:54:19] hindi
[1:54:20] mo
[1:54:20] nawakan
[1:54:20] hindi
[1:54:21] mo
[1:54:21] actual
[1:54:22] narinig
[1:54:22] sa
[1:54:23] mga
[1:54:23] testimony
[1:54:23] ng
[1:54:23] mga
[1:54:25] witnesses
[1:54:25] which
[1:54:26] again
[1:54:26] is
[1:54:27] not
[1:54:27] opposed
[1:54:28] to
[1:54:28] the
[1:54:28] Avelino
[1:54:29] Doctrine
[1:54:30] which
[1:54:30] is
[1:54:30] not
[1:54:31] opposed
[1:54:31] to
[1:54:31] our
[1:54:32] position
[1:54:32] that
[1:54:32] the
[1:54:32] Senate
[1:54:33] has
[1:54:33] to
[1:54:33] be
[1:54:33] also
[1:54:33] functional
[1:54:34] which
[1:54:35] is
[1:54:35] not
[1:54:35] also
[1:54:35] opposed
[1:54:36] to
[1:54:36] the
[1:54:36] issue
[1:54:37] that
[1:54:37] we
[1:54:37] are
[1:54:37] trying
[1:54:37] to
[1:54:38] brought
[1:54:38] out
[1:54:38] na
[1:54:39] ang
[1:54:39] Constitution
[1:54:39] it
[1:54:40] has
[1:54:40] to
[1:54:40] go
[1:54:40] hand
[1:54:41] in
[1:54:41] hand
[1:54:41] with
[1:54:41] the
[1:54:41] experience
[1:54:42] of
[1:54:42] man
[1:54:42] did
[1:54:44] the
[1:54:45] prosecution
[1:54:45] receive
[1:54:46] any
[1:54:46] other
[1:54:47] communication
[1:54:48] from
[1:54:48] the
[1:54:49] Senate
[1:54:49] or
[1:54:49] from
[1:54:50] another
[1:54:51] faction
[1:54:51] of
[1:54:51] the
[1:54:52] Senate
[1:54:52] except
[1:54:53] from
[1:54:53] the
[1:54:53] notice
[1:54:54] for
[1:54:54] pretrial
[1:54:55] conference
[1:54:56] none
[1:54:56] yet
[1:54:57] wala
[1:54:57] pa
[1:54:57] po
[1:54:58] kaming
[1:54:58] narireceive
[1:54:59] na
[1:54:59] iba
[1:54:59] thank
[1:55:00] you
[1:55:01] po
[1:55:01] thank
[1:55:02] you
[1:55:02] Vivian
[1:55:03] we
[1:55:03] will
[1:55:04] now
[1:55:04] recognize
[1:55:05] Gidea
[1:55:05] Bernardo
[1:55:06] of
[1:55:06] D8
[1:55:07] TV
[1:55:07] follow
[1:55:09] up
[1:55:09] lang
[1:55:09] po
[1:55:09] yung
[1:55:10] good
[1:55:10] afternoon
[1:55:10] po
[1:55:11] during
[1:55:12] the
[1:55:12] conference
[1:55:13] last
[1:55:13] week
[1:55:14] we've
[1:55:14] mentioned
[1:55:14] that
[1:55:14] there
[1:55:15] is
[1:55:15] overwhelming
[1:55:16] they keep
[1:55:17] on
[1:55:17] coming
[1:55:17] the
[1:55:18] private
[1:55:18] prosecutors
[1:55:19] po
[1:55:19] do we
[1:55:20] have
[1:55:20] a
[1:55:20] specific
[1:55:21] targeted
[1:55:21] number
[1:55:22] kung
[1:55:22] ilan
[1:55:22] lang
[1:55:22] po
[1:55:23] yung
[1:55:23] pwedeng
[1:55:23] sumama
[1:55:23] sa
[1:55:23] prosecution
[1:55:24] team
[1:55:25] and if
[1:55:25] there
[1:55:25] is
[1:55:25] a
[1:55:26] specific
[1:55:26] number
[1:55:26] how
[1:55:27] are
[1:55:27] we
[1:55:27] screening
[1:55:28] them
[1:55:29] do we
[1:55:29] screen
[1:55:29] them
[1:55:30] po
[1:55:30] ba
[1:55:30] ideally
[1:55:31] it
[1:55:33] should
[1:55:34] be
[1:55:34] identical
[1:55:35] to the
[1:55:36] number
[1:55:36] of
[1:55:36] the
[1:55:37] public
[1:55:38] prosecutors
[1:55:38] remember
[1:55:39] we are
[1:55:40] 11
[1:55:40] no
[1:55:41] so
[1:55:42] ideally
[1:55:42] 11
[1:55:43] din
[1:55:43] yung
[1:55:43] private
[1:55:44] prosecutors
[1:55:44] we
[1:55:45] introduced
[1:55:46] 10
[1:55:46] already
[1:55:47] but
[1:55:48] certainly
[1:55:48] those
[1:55:49] who
[1:55:49] will
[1:55:49] not
[1:55:50] be
[1:55:50] entering
[1:55:50] appearance
[1:55:51] before
[1:55:52] the
[1:55:52] impeachment
[1:55:52] court
[1:55:53] will
[1:55:53] still
[1:55:53] be
[1:55:54] part
[1:55:54] of
[1:55:54] the
[1:55:54] team
[1:55:55] because
[1:55:56] significant
[1:55:57] yung
[1:55:57] preparation
[1:55:58] before
[1:55:59] trial
[1:55:59] so
[1:56:00] to
[1:56:02] your
[1:56:02] question
[1:56:03] how
[1:56:05] this
[1:56:06] will
[1:56:07] determine
[1:56:07] first
[1:56:08] and
[1:56:09] foremost
[1:56:09] they
[1:56:10] share
[1:56:10] the
[1:56:10] same
[1:56:10] position
[1:56:11] as
[1:56:11] ours
[1:56:12] second
[1:56:13] should
[1:56:14] pro
[1:56:14] pro
[1:56:14] pro
[1:56:14] bono
[1:56:15] because
[1:56:16] public
[1:56:18] prosecutors
[1:56:18] and
[1:56:19] third
[1:56:19] of
[1:56:20] course
[1:56:20] we
[1:56:20] consider
[1:56:20] the
[1:56:21] competence
[1:56:21] and
[1:56:22] so
[1:56:22] far
[1:56:22] from
[1:56:23] the
[1:56:23] first
[1:56:23] batch
[1:56:23] nakita
[1:56:24] nyo
[1:56:24] naman
[1:56:24] lahat
[1:56:25] abogado
[1:56:26] de
[1:56:26] campanilla
[1:56:27] private
[1:56:28] prosecutors
[1:56:29] who are
[1:56:29] joining
[1:56:30] the
[1:56:30] prosecution
[1:56:30] team
[1:56:31] last
[1:56:32] na lang
[1:56:32] po
[1:56:32] the
[1:56:33] next
[1:56:34] batch
[1:56:34] will
[1:56:35] they
[1:56:35] be
[1:56:35] introduced
[1:56:36] before
[1:56:36] the
[1:56:36] trial
[1:56:37] July 6
[1:56:38] I
[1:56:39] am
[1:56:40] inclined
[1:56:40] to
[1:56:40] introduce
[1:56:41] all
[1:56:41] of
[1:56:41] them
[1:56:42] before
[1:56:42] we
[1:56:42] start
[1:56:42] the
[1:56:42] trial
[1:56:43] thank
[1:56:45] you
[1:56:45] po
[1:56:46] thank
[1:56:47] you
[1:56:47] Judea
[1:56:47] thank
[1:56:48] you
[1:56:48] for
[1:56:49] waiting
[1:56:49] Red
[1:56:49] Mendoza
[1:56:50] from
[1:56:50] Manila
[1:56:51] Times
[1:56:51] hi
[1:56:53] po
[1:56:53] good
[1:56:54] afternoon
[1:56:54] una
[1:56:55] po
[1:56:55] muna
[1:56:56] yung
[1:56:56] sa mga
[1:56:56] private
[1:56:57] prosecutors
[1:56:57] hindi
[1:56:57] po
[1:56:58] lahat
[1:56:58] sila
[1:56:58] mga
[1:56:58] anti
[1:56:59] Duterte
[1:56:59] mga
[1:57:00] galit
[1:57:00] kay
[1:57:01] VP
[1:57:01] Sara
[1:57:02] kasi
[1:57:02] halos
[1:57:03] lahat
[1:57:03] sila
[1:57:03] puro
[1:57:04] mga
[1:57:04] galit
[1:57:05] kay
[1:57:05] Vice
[1:57:05] President
[1:57:06] Sara
[1:57:06] Duterte
[1:57:07] what's
[1:57:08] your
[1:57:08] thoughts
[1:57:08] po
[1:57:08] sa mga
[1:57:09] private
[1:57:09] prosecutors
[1:57:10] na
[1:57:10] lahat
[1:57:10] po
[1:57:10] sila
[1:57:11] mga
[1:57:11] DDH
[1:57:12] or
[1:57:12] die
[1:57:12] hard
[1:57:12] Duterte
[1:57:13] haters
[1:57:13] we
[1:57:16] have
[1:57:17] said
[1:57:17] this
[1:57:17] before
[1:57:17] and
[1:57:18] we
[1:57:18] will
[1:57:18] say
[1:57:19] it
[1:57:19] again
[1:57:19] this
[1:57:20] impeachment
[1:57:21] trial
[1:57:21] is
[1:57:22] not
[1:57:22] about
[1:57:22] personalities
[1:57:23] and
[1:57:25] I
[1:57:26] think
[1:57:26] the
[1:57:26] private
[1:57:26] prosecutors
[1:57:27] beyond
[1:57:28] the
[1:57:29] personality
[1:57:29] stand
[1:57:30] for
[1:57:31] accountability
[1:57:31] mechanism
[1:57:32] no
[1:57:33] hindi
[1:57:33] ito
[1:57:34] tungkol
[1:57:35] kay
[1:57:35] Vice
[1:57:36] President
[1:57:36] tungkol
[1:57:37] ito
[1:57:38] sa
[1:57:38] accountability
[1:57:39] mechanism
[1:57:40] na dapat
[1:57:41] ipatupad
[1:57:42] whenever
[1:57:43] there are
[1:57:43] erring
[1:57:44] public
[1:57:45] official
[1:57:46] pero
[1:57:47] sabi
[1:57:47] po
[1:57:47] kasi
[1:57:48] ni
[1:57:48] attorney
[1:57:48] Capunan
[1:57:49] sa
[1:57:49] introduction
[1:57:50] no
[1:57:50] press
[1:57:50] release
[1:57:51] na
[1:57:51] wag
[1:57:52] do
[1:57:52] maniwala
[1:57:53] sa
[1:57:53] press
[1:57:53] release
[1:57:53] ni
[1:57:53] Vice
[1:57:54] President
[1:57:54] Sara
[1:57:54] Duterte
[1:57:55] or sa
[1:57:56] kahit
[1:57:56] nanong
[1:57:56] supporters
[1:57:57] po
[1:57:57] niya
[1:57:57] hindi
[1:57:57] po
[1:57:57] ba
[1:57:58] parang
[1:57:58] kinokontrol
[1:57:59] niyo
[1:57:59] ng
[1:58:00] prosecution
[1:58:01] yung
[1:58:01] narrative
[1:58:01] na
[1:58:02] dapat
[1:58:02] kayo
[1:58:03] lang
[1:58:03] ang
[1:58:03] pakinggan
[1:58:03] that's
[1:58:07] attorney
[1:58:07] Capunan's
[1:58:08] opinion
[1:58:09] so
[1:58:10] she
[1:58:11] has
[1:58:11] a
[1:58:11] right
[1:58:11] to
[1:58:12] say
[1:58:12] whatever
[1:58:12] she
[1:58:12] wants
[1:58:13] to
[1:58:13] say
[1:58:13] pero
[1:58:14] do you
[1:58:14] share
[1:58:15] that
[1:58:15] opinion
[1:58:15] sa
[1:58:16] prosecution
[1:58:16] kasi
[1:58:17] she
[1:58:17] is
[1:58:17] part
[1:58:17] of
[1:58:17] the
[1:58:18] private
[1:58:18] prosecution
[1:58:18] panel
[1:58:19] na
[1:58:20] dapat
[1:58:20] wag
[1:58:21] makinig
[1:58:21] kay
[1:58:21] VP
[1:58:22] Sara
[1:58:22] or
[1:58:23] sa
[1:58:23] kanyang
[1:58:24] mga
[1:58:24] abogado
[1:58:24] or
[1:58:25] press
[1:58:25] release
[1:58:25] it is
[1:58:26] not
[1:58:26] the
[1:58:26] official
[1:58:26] stand
[1:58:27] of
[1:58:27] the
[1:58:27] house
[1:58:28] prosecution
[1:58:28] team
[1:58:29] neither
[1:58:29] would
[1:58:30] it
[1:58:30] be
[1:58:30] the
[1:58:30] official
[1:58:30] stand
[1:58:31] of
[1:58:31] the
[1:58:31] private
[1:58:32] prosecution
[1:58:32] team
[1:58:33] it
[1:58:33] is
[1:58:33] spoken
[1:58:35] out
[1:58:35] by
[1:58:35] one
[1:58:36] member
[1:58:37] of
[1:58:37] the
[1:58:37] private
[1:58:37] prosecutor
[1:58:38] personal
[1:58:39] opinion
[1:58:40] which
[1:58:41] by the
[1:58:41] way
[1:58:42] she
[1:58:42] is
[1:58:42] entitled
[1:58:42] We never
[1:58:44] said
[1:58:45] that
[1:58:45] we
[1:58:45] should
[1:58:45] not
[1:58:46] listen
[1:58:47] to
[1:58:48] Vice
[1:58:48] President
[1:58:49] Sara
[1:58:49] Duterte
[1:58:50] or to
[1:58:51] her
[1:58:51] lawyers
[1:58:52] in fact
[1:58:53] we have
[1:58:53] been
[1:58:54] wanting
[1:58:54] them
[1:58:55] to speak
[1:58:55] at the
[1:58:57] Committee
[1:58:57] on
[1:58:58] Justice
[1:58:58] Hearings
[1:58:59] Hindi
[1:58:59] ba
[1:58:59] ilang
[1:59:00] beses
[1:59:00] tinatawag
[1:59:01] ang
[1:59:01] pangalan
[1:59:01] niya
[1:59:02] ilang
[1:59:02] beses
[1:59:02] siyang
[1:59:03] inimbitahan
[1:59:04] ilang
[1:59:04] beses
[1:59:04] hinihintay
[1:59:06] namin
[1:59:06] ang
[1:59:07] kanyang
[1:59:07] mga
[1:59:07] pahayag
[1:59:08] ang
[1:59:08] kanyang
[1:59:09] ebidensya
[1:59:10] ang
[1:59:13] impeachment
[1:59:15] complaints
[1:59:15] so
[1:59:16] hindi
[1:59:17] po
[1:59:18] tama
[1:59:18] nasabihin
[1:59:19] na
[1:59:20] kinocontrol
[1:59:20] namin
[1:59:21] ang
[1:59:21] naratiba
[1:59:22] gusto
[1:59:22] lang
[1:59:22] po
[1:59:23] namin
[1:59:23] in fact
[1:59:24] gusto
[1:59:24] namin
[1:59:25] na
[1:59:25] sila
[1:59:25] magsalita
[1:59:26] ilabas
[1:59:27] natin
[1:59:27] ang
[1:59:27] aming
[1:59:28] ebidensya
[1:59:29] ilabas
[1:59:29] nila
[1:59:30] ang
[1:59:30] kanilang
[1:59:30] ebidensya
[1:59:31] pero ma'am
[1:59:32] kasi po
[1:59:32] sinasay
[1:59:33] po
[1:59:33] ng
[1:59:33] defense
[1:59:33] team
[1:59:34] na
[1:59:34] hindi
[1:59:34] po
[1:59:34] sila
[1:59:34] maglalabas
[1:59:35] ng
[1:59:35] ebidensya
[1:59:36] on
[1:59:37] the
[1:59:37] public
[1:59:37] space
[1:59:38] they
[1:59:38] want
[1:59:38] to
[1:59:39] share
[1:59:39] the
[1:59:39] evidence
[1:59:40] sa
[1:59:40] loob
[1:59:41] ng
[1:59:42] impeachment
[1:59:43] trial
[1:59:43] sa
[1:59:43] loob
[1:59:44] ng
[1:59:44] senate
[1:59:44] kaya
[1:59:44] hindi
[1:59:44] po
[1:59:45] sila
[1:59:45] magpatawag
[1:59:45] o
[1:59:46] magpatawag
[1:59:47] ng
[1:59:47] press
[1:59:48] conferences
[1:59:49] while
[1:59:49] sa
[1:59:49] house
[1:59:50] is
[1:59:50] almost
[1:59:51] the
[1:59:51] same
[1:59:51] parang
[1:59:52] may
[1:59:53] mga
[1:59:53] release
[1:59:54] almost
[1:59:55] every
[1:59:55] week
[1:59:55] about
[1:59:56] the
[1:59:56] vice
[1:59:56] president
[1:59:57] and
[1:59:57] parang
[1:59:57] and the
[1:59:58] thing
[1:59:58] is
[1:59:58] the
[1:59:59] house
[1:59:59] prosecution
[2:00:00] is
[2:00:00] the
[2:00:00] one
[2:00:00] controlling
[2:00:01] the
[2:00:01] media
[2:00:01] narrative
[2:00:02] your
[2:00:02] thoughts
[2:00:02] po
[2:00:02] Una
[2:00:03] una
[2:00:03] po
[2:00:03] simula
[2:00:04] nung
[2:00:04] nag
[2:00:04] convene
[2:00:05] ng
[2:00:05] impeachment
[2:00:06] court
[2:00:06] wala
[2:00:07] po
[2:00:07] kaming
[2:00:07] nilalabas
[2:00:08] na
[2:00:08] ebidensya
[2:00:09] wala
[2:00:09] po
[2:00:09] kaming
[2:00:09] sinasabi
[2:00:10] about
[2:00:10] the
[2:00:10] merits
[2:00:11] because
[2:00:12] as we
[2:00:13] have
[2:00:13] said
[2:00:13] we're
[2:00:14] under
[2:00:14] a
[2:00:15] subjudice
[2:00:15] now
[2:00:16] kung
[2:00:17] gusto
[2:00:17] po
[2:00:17] nilang
[2:00:18] ilabas
[2:00:18] lamang
[2:00:19] sa
[2:00:20] korte
[2:00:21] tama
[2:00:21] naman
[2:00:22] din po
[2:00:22] yun
[2:00:22] dahil
[2:00:23] subjudice
[2:00:24] nga
[2:00:24] bawal
[2:00:24] po
[2:00:25] kami
[2:00:25] maglabas
[2:00:25] ng
[2:00:25] ebidensya
[2:00:26] bawal
[2:00:27] po
[2:00:27] kami
[2:00:27] mag
[2:00:27] discuss
[2:00:28] ng
[2:00:28] merito
[2:00:28] ng
[2:00:29] kaso
[2:00:29] ngayon
[2:00:29] and
[2:00:30] in
[2:00:30] fact
[2:00:31] to
[2:00:32] their
[2:00:33] statement
[2:00:33] that
[2:00:34] they
[2:00:34] will
[2:00:34] just
[2:00:35] release
[2:00:36] it
[2:00:36] at
[2:00:37] the
[2:00:37] court
[2:00:37] then
[2:00:38] that's
[2:00:38] great
[2:00:38] because
[2:00:39] we
[2:00:39] expect
[2:00:40] them
[2:00:40] to
[2:00:41] state
[2:00:42] their
[2:00:42] case
[2:00:45] and
[2:00:45] to
[2:00:46] present
[2:00:46] their
[2:00:46] evidence
[2:00:47] if
[2:00:47] they
[2:00:47] have
[2:00:47] evidence
[2:00:48] Red
[2:00:49] if
[2:00:49] they
[2:00:49] choose
[2:00:50] to
[2:00:50] remain
[2:00:50] silent
[2:00:51] about
[2:00:51] all
[2:00:51] of
[2:00:51] these
[2:00:52] things
[2:00:52] that's
[2:00:52] their
[2:00:52] business
[2:00:53] but
[2:00:54] they
[2:00:54] cannot
[2:00:54] dictate
[2:00:55] upon
[2:00:55] us
[2:00:55] not
[2:00:56] to
[2:00:56] inform
[2:00:56] the
[2:00:56] public
[2:00:57] of
[2:00:57] every
[2:00:58] development
[2:00:58] that
[2:00:59] is
[2:00:59] happening
[2:01:00] when
[2:01:00] it
[2:01:00] comes
[2:01:01] to
[2:01:01] the
[2:01:01] issue
[2:01:01] of
[2:01:01] impeachment
[2:01:02] because
[2:01:02] the
[2:01:02] public
[2:01:03] deserves
[2:01:03] to
[2:01:03] know
[2:01:04] they
[2:01:04] deserve
[2:01:04] clarity
[2:01:05] and
[2:01:06] they
[2:01:06] deserve
[2:01:06] to
[2:01:07] see
[2:01:07] the
[2:01:08] evidence
[2:01:08] that
[2:01:08] will
[2:01:09] be
[2:01:09] presented
[2:01:09] in
[2:01:09] the
[2:01:10] open
[2:01:10] court
[2:01:10] trial
[2:01:11] that's
[2:01:11] their
[2:01:12] business
[2:01:12] if they
[2:01:12] so
[2:01:12] decide
[2:01:13] that
[2:01:13] they
[2:01:13] will
[2:01:13] mom
[2:01:13] about
[2:01:14] this
[2:01:14] issue
[2:01:15] please
[2:01:17] understand
[2:01:18] that
[2:01:18] the
[2:01:19] house
[2:01:19] representatives
[2:01:20] in
[2:01:21] this
[2:01:21] impeachment
[2:01:22] trial
[2:01:23] is
[2:01:24] representing
[2:01:24] the
[2:01:25] sovereign
[2:01:26] Filipino
[2:01:26] people
[2:01:27] impeachment
[2:01:28] is
[2:01:29] a
[2:01:29] mechanism
[2:01:30] that
[2:01:31] was
[2:01:31] given
[2:01:31] to
[2:01:32] the
[2:01:32] Filipino
[2:01:33] people
[2:01:33] to
[2:01:34] go
[2:01:34] against
[2:01:35] the
[2:01:35] erring
[2:01:36] public
[2:01:36] official
[2:01:36] in
[2:01:37] other
[2:01:37] words
[2:01:38] the
[2:01:38] interest
[2:01:39] which
[2:01:40] is
[2:01:40] being
[2:01:40] represented
[2:01:41] by
[2:01:41] us
[2:01:42] in
[2:01:43] this
[2:01:43] trial
[2:01:43] is
[2:01:44] not
[2:01:44] our
[2:01:44] personal
[2:01:45] interest
[2:01:45] but
[2:01:46] the
[2:01:46] interest
[2:01:47] of
[2:01:47] the
[2:01:47] Filipino
[2:01:48] people
[2:01:48] suffice
[2:01:50] it
[2:01:50] to
[2:01:50] say
[2:01:51] that
[2:01:51] we
[2:01:51] need
[2:01:52] to
[2:01:52] share
[2:01:53] to
[2:01:53] the
[2:01:54] people
[2:01:54] whom
[2:01:54] we
[2:01:55] represent
[2:01:55] what
[2:01:56] is
[2:01:56] going
[2:01:56] on
[2:01:57] in
[2:01:57] as
[2:01:57] far
[2:01:57] as
[2:01:57] the
[2:01:58] preparation
[2:01:58] for
[2:01:58] the
[2:01:58] trial
[2:01:59] is
[2:01:59] concerned
[2:01:59] this
[2:02:00] is
[2:02:01] the
[2:02:01] people's
[2:02:01] right
[2:02:02] to
[2:02:02] information
[2:02:02] that
[2:02:04] is
[2:02:04] why
[2:02:04] we
[2:02:04] are
[2:02:05] prompted
[2:02:05] to
[2:02:06] update
[2:02:07] from
[2:02:07] time
[2:02:08] to
[2:02:08] time
[2:02:08] what
[2:02:09] is
[2:02:09] happening
[2:02:09] with
[2:02:10] regards
[2:02:10] to
[2:02:10] the
[2:02:10] preparation
[2:02:11] of
[2:02:11] the
[2:02:11] prosecutors
[2:02:12] the
[2:02:13] people
[2:02:14] are
[2:02:15] our
[2:02:15] client
[2:02:16] here
[2:02:17] and
[2:02:17] they
[2:02:18] need
[2:02:18] to
[2:02:18] know
[2:02:18] the
[2:02:20] things
[2:02:20] that
[2:02:20] the
[2:02:20] public
[2:02:21] prosecutors
[2:02:22] are
[2:02:22] doing
[2:02:22] in
[2:02:23] relation
[2:02:23] to
[2:02:23] this
[2:02:24] trial
[2:02:24] last
[2:02:26] on
[2:02:26] my
[2:02:27] end
[2:02:27] kasi
[2:02:27] na
[2:02:27] mention
[2:02:28] nyo
[2:02:28] nga
[2:02:28] po
[2:02:28] na
[2:02:28] may
[2:02:29] evidence
[2:02:34] yung
[2:02:34] bank
[2:02:36] documents
[2:02:37] na
[2:02:37] parang
[2:02:38] isasamod
[2:02:38] yata
[2:02:39] yung
[2:02:39] bank
[2:02:39] executives
[2:02:40] it's
[2:02:42] not
[2:02:42] a surprise
[2:02:43] evidence
[2:02:46] na
[2:02:47] parang
[2:02:47] sinasabi
[2:02:48] nyo
[2:02:48] na
[2:02:48] you're
[2:02:48] going
[2:02:48] to
[2:02:49] present
[2:02:49] it
[2:02:50] naman
[2:02:50] sa
[2:02:50] trial
[2:02:50] pero
[2:02:51] do
[2:02:51] you
[2:02:51] think
[2:02:51] po
[2:02:51] ba
[2:02:52] the
[2:02:53] defense
[2:02:53] should
[2:02:53] also
[2:02:54] be
[2:02:54] informed
[2:02:55] of
[2:02:55] this
[2:02:55] so-called
[2:02:57] evidence
[2:02:57] during
[2:02:58] the
[2:02:58] pre-trial
[2:02:58] definitely
[2:03:00] they
[2:03:01] will
[2:03:01] be
[2:03:01] informed
[2:03:02] because
[2:03:02] they
[2:03:02] will
[2:03:02] be
[2:03:02] given
[2:03:03] copy
[2:03:03] of
[2:03:03] our
[2:03:04] pre-trial
[2:03:04] brief
[2:03:05] in
[2:03:05] the
[2:03:05] same
[2:03:05] way
[2:03:06] that
[2:03:06] they
[2:03:07] will
[2:03:07] be
[2:03:07] giving
[2:03:07] us
[2:03:08] copy
[2:03:08] also
[2:03:08] of
[2:03:09] their
[2:03:09] pre-trial
[2:03:09] brief
[2:03:10] so
[2:03:10] to
[2:03:10] your
[2:03:11] question
[2:03:11] whether
[2:03:12] the
[2:03:12] defense
[2:03:12] will
[2:03:13] be
[2:03:13] informed
[2:03:13] definitely
[2:03:14] yes
[2:03:15] the
[2:03:17] defense
[2:03:17] lawyers
[2:03:19] and in
[2:03:20] fact
[2:03:20] the
[2:03:20] vice
[2:03:20] president
[2:03:21] are
[2:03:21] expected
[2:03:21] to
[2:03:22] be
[2:03:22] there
[2:03:23] at
[2:03:23] the
[2:03:23] pre-trial
[2:03:23] conference
[2:03:24] so
[2:03:25] kung
[2:03:25] anuman
[2:03:26] nakalagay
[2:03:27] sa
[2:03:27] pre-trial
[2:03:28] brief
[2:03:28] namin
[2:03:28] makikita
[2:03:29] nila
[2:03:29] yun
[2:03:30] at
[2:03:30] sila
[2:03:30] din
[2:03:31] po
[2:03:31] mismo
[2:03:31] ay
[2:03:31] kailangan
[2:03:32] mag-submit
[2:03:32] din po
[2:03:33] ng
[2:03:33] pre-trial
[2:03:34] brief
[2:03:34] which
[2:03:35] we
[2:03:35] will
[2:03:35] all
[2:03:35] discuss
[2:03:36] at
[2:03:36] the
[2:03:36] pre-trial
[2:03:37] conference
[2:03:37] on
[2:03:37] Thursday
[2:03:38] last
[2:03:39] last
[2:03:39] last
[2:03:40] of
[2:03:41] course
[2:03:41] nangyari
[2:03:41] yung
[2:03:41] president
[2:03:42] estrada
[2:03:43] trial
[2:03:43] the
[2:03:44] second
[2:03:44] envelope
[2:03:45] thing
[2:03:45] the
[2:03:46] quote
[2:03:46] unquote
[2:03:47] surprise
[2:03:47] second
[2:03:49] envelope
[2:03:49] and also
[2:03:50] the
[2:03:50] clarisa
[2:03:50] ocampo
[2:03:51] surprise
[2:03:51] witnesses
[2:03:52] are
[2:03:53] we
[2:03:53] expecting
[2:03:54] mga
[2:03:55] ganitong
[2:03:55] surpresa
[2:03:57] like
[2:03:57] second
[2:03:58] envelope
[2:03:58] surprise
[2:03:59] witness
[2:04:00] the
[2:04:00] vice
[2:04:00] president
[2:04:01] is
[2:04:01] entirely
[2:04:01] different
[2:04:02] from
[2:04:03] the
[2:04:03] estrada
[2:04:04] trial
[2:04:04] no
[2:04:04] so
[2:04:05] we
[2:04:06] should
[2:04:06] not
[2:04:07] be
[2:04:07] likening
[2:04:08] this
[2:04:08] as
[2:04:10] open
[2:04:11] as
[2:04:11] possible
[2:04:11] to
[2:04:12] the
[2:04:12] past
[2:04:12] impeachment
[2:04:13] processes
[2:04:14] first
[2:04:14] and
[2:04:14] foremost
[2:04:15] the
[2:04:15] circumstances
[2:04:16] surrounding
[2:04:17] the set
[2:04:18] of
[2:04:18] facts
[2:04:18] are
[2:04:18] entirely
[2:04:19] different
[2:04:20] no
[2:04:20] so
[2:04:21] there
[2:04:23] will
[2:04:23] be
[2:04:23] no
[2:04:23] surprises
[2:04:24] there
[2:04:25] is
[2:04:26] a
[2:04:26] rule
[2:04:27] that
[2:04:27] witnesses
[2:04:28] who
[2:04:28] are
[2:04:28] not
[2:04:29] named
[2:04:29] in
[2:04:29] the
[2:04:29] pre-trial
[2:04:30] brief
[2:04:30] exhibits
[2:04:31] which
[2:04:32] are
[2:04:32] not
[2:04:32] marked
[2:04:32] during
[2:04:33] the
[2:04:33] pre-trial
[2:04:33] will
[2:04:34] not
[2:04:34] be
[2:04:34] allowed
[2:04:35] to
[2:04:35] be
[2:04:35] presented
[2:04:35] during
[2:04:36] the
[2:04:36] trial
[2:04:36] and
[2:04:37] of
[2:04:38] course
[2:04:38] we
[2:04:38] will
[2:04:38] not
[2:04:38] compromise
[2:04:39] the
[2:04:40] necessity
[2:04:40] of
[2:04:41] presenting
[2:04:43] vital
[2:04:43] witnesses
[2:04:43] just
[2:04:44] to
[2:04:44] be
[2:04:45] able
[2:04:45] to
[2:04:45] have
[2:04:46] some
[2:04:46] surprises
[2:04:47] during
[2:04:47] the
[2:04:48] trial
[2:04:48] no
[2:04:48] that
[2:04:49] will
[2:04:49] not
[2:04:49] happen
[2:04:49] because
[2:04:50] it
[2:04:50] will
[2:04:51] compromise
[2:04:51] our
[2:04:51] case
[2:04:52] so
[2:04:52] as
[2:04:52] early
[2:04:53] as
[2:04:53] during
[2:04:53] the
[2:04:53] pre-trial
[2:04:54] should
[2:04:55] you
[2:04:55] should
[2:04:55] be
[2:04:55] to
[2:04:56] test
[2:04:56] to
[2:04:56] test
[2:04:57] otherwise
[2:05:00] you
[2:05:01] will
[2:05:01] not
[2:05:01] be
[2:05:02] allowed
[2:05:02] during
[2:05:02] the
[2:05:02] trial
[2:05:03] to
[2:05:03] present
[2:05:03] them
[2:05:04] and
[2:05:04] we
[2:05:04] do
[2:05:04] not
[2:05:05] want
[2:05:05] that
[2:05:05] to
[2:05:05] happen
[2:05:05] thank
[2:05:10] you
[2:05:10] red
[2:05:10] as
[2:05:10] we
[2:05:10] wrap
[2:05:11] up
[2:05:11] today's
[2:05:11] briefing
[2:05:12] we
[2:05:12] invite
[2:05:13] our
[2:05:13] distinguished
[2:05:14] guests
[2:05:14] to
[2:05:15] share
[2:05:15] their
[2:05:16] short
[2:05:17] closing
[2:05:17] remarks
[2:05:18] by way
[2:05:28] of
[2:05:28] closing
[2:05:29] let
[2:05:30] me
[2:05:30] mention
[2:05:32] that
[2:05:32] today
[2:05:33] we
[2:05:33] will
[2:05:33] be
[2:05:33] filing
[2:05:34] our
[2:05:34] pre-trial
[2:05:35] brief
[2:05:36] which
[2:05:36] will
[2:05:37] contain
[2:05:37] the
[2:05:37] stipulation
[2:05:38] of
[2:05:38] facts
[2:05:39] list
[2:05:39] of
[2:05:39] witnesses
[2:05:40] list
[2:05:40] of
[2:05:41] documentary
[2:05:41] exhibits
[2:05:42] proposed
[2:05:43] issues
[2:05:47] proposed
[2:05:48] trial
[2:05:49] dates
[2:05:49] and
[2:05:51] we
[2:05:51] will
[2:05:51] be
[2:05:51] filing
[2:05:52] that
[2:05:52] later
[2:05:53] before
[2:05:54] the
[2:05:54] Senate
[2:05:54] impeachment
[2:05:55] court
[2:05:55] on
[2:05:57] Thursday
[2:05:58] will
[2:05:58] be
[2:05:59] the
[2:05:59] pre-trial
[2:06:00] conference
[2:06:01] and
[2:06:02] the
[2:06:02] public
[2:06:03] prosecutors
[2:06:04] as well
[2:06:04] as the
[2:06:05] private
[2:06:05] prosecutors
[2:06:06] will all
[2:06:07] be
[2:06:07] attending
[2:06:07] now
[2:06:09] as
[2:06:11] we
[2:06:11] all
[2:06:11] understand
[2:06:12] the
[2:06:13] media
[2:06:14] will
[2:06:14] not
[2:06:14] be
[2:06:15] will
[2:06:15] not
[2:06:15] be
[2:06:15] covering
[2:06:16] the
[2:06:16] pre-trial
[2:06:17] conference
[2:06:17] as
[2:06:18] declared
[2:06:19] by
[2:06:20] the
[2:06:21] Senate
[2:06:21] in
[2:06:21] their
[2:06:22] notice
[2:06:23] of
[2:06:24] preliminary
[2:06:25] conference
[2:06:26] of
[2:06:26] pre-trial
[2:06:27] conference
[2:06:27] but
[2:06:29] we
[2:06:29] assure
[2:06:30] you
[2:06:30] that
[2:06:31] as
[2:06:32] long
[2:06:32] as
[2:06:32] we
[2:06:32] are
[2:06:32] allowed
[2:06:33] we
[2:06:33] will
[2:06:33] update
[2:06:34] the
[2:06:35] public
[2:06:35] of
[2:06:36] the
[2:06:36] proceedings
[2:06:36] in
[2:06:37] the
[2:06:37] pre-trial
[2:06:37] conference
[2:06:40] that
[2:06:40] we
[2:06:40] will
[2:06:40] be
[2:06:41] held
[2:06:41] on
[2:06:42] Thursday
[2:06:42] and
[2:06:43] if
[2:06:45] that
[2:06:46] is
[2:06:46] also
[2:06:46] allowed
[2:06:46] we
[2:06:47] will
[2:06:47] share
[2:06:48] the
[2:06:48] pre-trial
[2:06:49] order
[2:06:49] that
[2:06:50] will
[2:06:50] also
[2:06:50] be
[2:06:50] shared
[2:06:51] with
[2:06:51] us
[2:06:51] bismillahirrahmanirrahim
[2:06:55] hinihikayat po
[2:06:57] namin
[2:06:57] ang ating
[2:06:58] taong
[2:06:58] bayan
[2:06:59] na
[2:07:00] makilahok
[2:07:01] makinig
[2:07:02] at
[2:07:02] mag-update
[2:07:03] po
[2:07:03] patungkol
[2:07:05] dito
[2:07:05] sa
[2:07:06] impeachment
[2:07:07] trial
[2:07:07] na ito
[2:07:08] laban
[2:07:09] kay
[2:07:09] vice
[2:07:09] presidente
[2:07:10] Sara
[2:07:10] Duterte
[2:07:11] tulad
[2:07:11] po
[2:07:11] ng
[2:07:11] sinabi
[2:07:12] ng
[2:07:12] ating
[2:07:12] lead
[2:07:13] council
[2:07:13] congresswoman
[2:07:14] jinky
[2:07:15] luistro
[2:07:15] ang
[2:07:16] kliyente
[2:07:16] po
[2:07:16] ng
[2:07:17] house
[2:07:17] prosecution
[2:07:17] team
[2:07:18] ay
[2:07:18] ang
[2:07:18] taong
[2:07:18] bayan
[2:07:19] pinag-uusapan
[2:07:20] po
[2:07:20] natin
[2:07:21] dito
[2:07:21] yung
[2:07:22] katatagan
[2:07:22] ng
[2:07:22] ating
[2:07:23] konstitusyon
[2:07:24] na
[2:07:24] panindigan
[2:07:25] yung
[2:07:26] mga
[2:07:27] tao
[2:07:27] o
[2:07:27] elitis
[2:07:29] ang
[2:07:29] mga
[2:07:29] opisyal
[2:07:30] na may
[2:07:31] charges
[2:07:32] na pagkakasala
[2:07:33] na labag
[2:07:33] sa ating
[2:07:34] konstitusyon
[2:07:35] so
[2:07:35] again
[2:07:35] we
[2:07:36] are
[2:07:36] requesting
[2:07:37] the
[2:07:37] public
[2:07:38] to
[2:07:38] join
[2:07:39] our
[2:07:39] call
[2:07:40] for
[2:07:40] the
[2:07:41] proceeding
[2:07:43] of
[2:07:44] an
[2:07:44] immediate
[2:07:44] open
[2:07:45] trial
[2:07:45] of
[2:07:46] the
[2:07:46] impeachment
[2:07:46] court
[2:07:46] marami
[2:07:47] pong
[2:07:47] salamat
[2:07:48] in
[2:07:52] addition
[2:07:52] to
[2:07:52] the
[2:07:52] contents
[2:07:53] of
[2:07:53] the
[2:07:53] pretrial
[2:07:54] brief
[2:07:54] we
[2:07:55] want
[2:07:55] to
[2:07:55] formalize
[2:07:56] our
[2:07:56] discussion
[2:07:57] also
[2:07:57] before
[2:07:58] the
[2:07:58] impeachment
[2:07:59] court
[2:07:59] on
[2:07:59] whether
[2:07:59] or
[2:08:00] not
[2:08:00] the
[2:08:00] open
[2:08:00] rule
[2:08:01] will
[2:08:01] be
[2:08:01] adopted
[2:08:02] the
[2:08:02] possibility
[2:08:03] of
[2:08:04] having
[2:08:05] both
[2:08:05] Filipino
[2:08:06] and
[2:08:07] English
[2:08:07] become
[2:08:08] part
[2:08:09] as
[2:08:09] official
[2:08:10] language
[2:08:11] to be
[2:08:11] used
[2:08:11] during
[2:08:12] the
[2:08:12] impeachment
[2:08:13] trial
[2:08:13] the
[2:08:14] position
[2:08:15] of
[2:08:15] the
[2:08:15] House
[2:08:16] of
[2:08:16] Representatives
[2:08:17] that
[2:08:17] we
[2:08:18] are
[2:08:19] inclined
[2:08:20] to
[2:08:20] lean
[2:08:20] more
[2:08:21] on
[2:08:21] substance
[2:08:22] rather
[2:08:22] than
[2:08:22] technicalities
[2:08:23] and
[2:08:24] of
[2:08:24] course
[2:08:24] this
[2:08:25] concern
[2:08:26] about
[2:08:26] translation
[2:08:27] to
[2:08:27] as
[2:08:27] many
[2:08:28] dialects
[2:08:28] as
[2:08:28] possible
[2:08:29] we
[2:08:30] understand
[2:08:32] that
[2:08:33] the
[2:08:33] members
[2:08:33] of
[2:08:33] the
[2:08:34] House
[2:08:34] come
[2:08:35] from
[2:08:35] different
[2:08:36] legislative
[2:08:37] districts
[2:08:37] all
[2:08:38] over
[2:08:38] the
[2:08:38] country
[2:08:39] and
[2:08:39] definitely
[2:08:40] they
[2:08:40] are
[2:08:40] in
[2:08:41] the
[2:08:41] best
[2:08:41] position
[2:08:41] to
[2:08:42] realize
[2:08:42] the
[2:08:43] objective
[2:08:44] of
[2:08:44] having
[2:08:45] this
[2:08:45] trial
[2:08:45] translated
[2:08:46] into
[2:08:47] as
[2:08:47] many
[2:08:48] dialects
[2:08:48] as
[2:08:48] possible
[2:08:49] again
[2:08:50] we
[2:08:50] want
[2:08:50] all
[2:08:51] the
[2:08:51] Filipino
[2:08:52] people
[2:08:52] to be
[2:08:52] involved
[2:08:53] in
[2:08:53] this
[2:08:53] impeachment
[2:08:54] trial
[2:08:54] because
[2:08:55] after
[2:08:55] all
[2:08:56] it
[2:08:56] is
[2:08:56] their
[2:08:57] interest
[2:08:57] that
[2:08:58] we
[2:08:58] represent
[2:08:59] so
[2:08:59] in
[2:08:59] conclusion
[2:09:00] in
[2:09:01] the
[2:09:01] whole
[2:09:01] of
[2:09:02] Filipino
[2:09:02] we
[2:09:03] have
[2:09:03] come
[2:09:04] to
[2:09:04] this
[2:09:05] impeachment
[2:09:06] trial
[2:09:07] is
[2:09:07] accountability
[2:09:08] mechanism
[2:09:09] which is
[2:09:10] innate
[2:09:10] in
[2:09:11] democracy
[2:09:11] we
[2:09:13] have
[2:09:13] come
[2:09:13] to
[2:09:14] the
[2:09:14] end of
[2:09:15] democracy
[2:09:16] let us
[2:09:17] uphold
[2:09:18] the
[2:09:19] supremacy
[2:09:19] of the
[2:09:20] sovereign
[2:09:21] Filipino
[2:09:21] people
[2:09:22] para
[2:09:22] po
[2:09:23] ito
[2:09:23] sa
[2:09:23] lahat
[2:09:24] ng
[2:09:24] Pilipino
[2:09:25] at
[2:09:25] sa
[2:09:25] mga
[2:09:26] darating
[2:09:26] pang
[2:09:26] generasyon
[2:09:27] maraming
[2:09:30] salamat
[2:09:31] po
[2:09:31] uli
[2:09:31] House
[2:09:32] Lead
[2:09:32] Prosecutor
[2:09:33] and
[2:09:34] Committee
[2:09:35] on
[2:09:35] Justice
[2:09:35] Care
[2:09:36] Person
[2:09:36] Attorney
[2:09:37] Gerbil
[2:09:37] Genki
[2:09:38] Betrix
[2:09:38] Loistro
[2:09:39] Batangas
[2:09:39] House
[2:09:40] Prosecutor
[2:09:41] Attorney
[2:09:42] Isabel
[2:09:43] Maria
[2:09:44] Bel
[2:09:45] J.
[2:09:45] Zamora
[2:09:46] of San Juan
[2:09:46] and
[2:09:47] House
[2:09:47] Trial
[2:09:48] Spokesperson
[2:09:49] Siya
[2:09:50] Alonto
[2:09:50] Adyong
[2:09:50] of
[2:09:51] Lana
[2:09:51] Del Sur
[2:09:51] for
[2:09:51] joining
[2:09:52] us
[2:09:52] this
[2:09:52] afternoon
[2:09:53] to
[2:09:53] everyone
[2:09:54] magandang tanghali
[2:09:55] po sa inyo
[2:09:56] lahat