About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of DEBATE: Brian Tyler Cohen vs Caroline Sunshine on Redistricting, Spencer Pratt from Elex Michaelson and Brian Tyler Cohen, published May 16, 2026. The transcript contains 2,273 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"let's bring in brian tyler cohen host of the no lie with brian tyler cohen podcast and caroline sunshine former communications aide for president trump's 2024 presidential campaign welcome back to both of you brian let's start with you you have been on this redistricting train for years yeah..."
[0:00] let's bring in brian tyler cohen host of the no lie with brian tyler cohen podcast
[0:04] and caroline sunshine former communications aide for president trump's 2024 presidential campaign
[0:10] welcome back to both of you brian let's start with you you have been on this redistricting train
[0:15] for years yeah telling democrats that you should redistrict a lot of times they wouldn't listen to
[0:19] you now it seems like they finally are and realizing the risk of this what's your reaction
[0:24] to what happened in virginia and what democrats should do now look i think that the reaction
[0:28] to what happened in virginia is that it is the perfect encapsulation of the asymmetry between
[0:33] the two sides where we have independent redistricting commissions in all of the democratic weapons and
[0:39] you know even when you go to the voters even when three million people show up to vote in
[0:43] a referendum that based on some small technicality all of those voters voices are going to be silenced
[0:49] at the same time that we have republicans in florida in texas in north carolina possibly south carolina
[0:57] tennessee all who have just decided by fiat that they're going to redraw their state's maps i mean
[1:02] basically elected legislatures elected legislatures but but redrawing the state maps without a single
[1:07] person weighing in on this stuff basically ushering in jim crow 2.0 in the south i wouldn't be surprised
[1:12] if we get to a point where we see no black representation in any of these southern states
[1:17] and so i think it's a wake-up call to democrats across the country if you are a democrat in new
[1:22] jersey new york maryland illinois uh oregon washington colorado this is the time to start
[1:29] fighting back and recognize the urgency of this moment right here because republicans don't believe
[1:34] that democrats have a right to exist as a party and so if we don't start fighting back and if we
[1:39] don't stop unilaterally disarming they're going to we're basically going to good government
[1:44] ourselves into obscurity caroline what do you think of this is it is it jim crow 2.0 well so
[1:49] you're opposed to this because you think that this dilutes people's political power unfairly
[1:56] is that why you're opposed to this i think that it dilutes the ability of people in certain
[2:00] jurisdictions to be able to vote for their representatives nashville has been cracked into
[2:04] multiple districts memphis has been cracked in multiple districts and so there's no way that those
[2:08] people who live in those jurisdictions can vote for their representatives because the republicans
[2:12] have purposefully gerrymandered those states to dilute uh their voting power so you're against
[2:16] diluting voting power i'm against gerrymandering okay so do you support then illegal immigrants
[2:21] being allowed to vote in elections illegal immigrants don't vote in federal elections well illegal immigrants
[2:26] are who democrats want to vote in federal elections but do you say that doesn't make any sense
[2:31] it doesn't matter if they want it doesn't matter what anybody wants if you're about if you are against
[2:36] diluting political power for anybody you should not want illegal immigrants to vote in american elections
[2:41] because we can't this isn't this isn't a discussion about that and illegal immigrants are not allowed to
[2:50] vote in federal elections what about this move of what the supreme court did and what republicans are doing
[2:55] right now when it comes to redistricting a lot of this started with president trump telling texas
[2:59] to get him more congressional districts well i think checks and balances played out here i mean
[3:04] the virginia supreme court said this can't happen in 2026 but it could happen in 2028 so i'm not sure
[3:10] what the big deal is here this went through the democratic process and the supreme court the judge
[3:14] struck it down saying the language in the referendum was flagrary misleading and he's not saying it can't
[3:19] happen he's just saying it can't happen in 2026 because it's unconstitutional and he's correct
[3:23] because that is a flagrant power play by democrats to try to reshape the midterms in 2026.
[3:28] now my question for you if you think that's a power play was it was it a power was it a power play
[3:32] when donald trump demanded the same thing in texas said that he was entitled to five seats in texas
[3:37] was that a power play texas isn't virginia the states are sovereign according to the constitution
[3:41] 10th amendment says federalism i'm asking you if it was a power play it played out how it played
[3:46] out in texas because texas isn't virginia i understand that texas is not virginia but i want
[3:50] to know if you think it was where does this go because you want to talk about power plays i would love to
[3:54] know hassan piker on your side of the aisle said today that as a result of this ruling if a peaceful
[3:59] revolution is not possible then violent revolution is inevitable so do you agree with hassan piker
[4:06] i'm not here to i'm not hassan piker hassan piker can do you agree with that hassan piker can speak
[4:10] for himself what does he mean by that i don't know you can ask him i'm not hassan piker i'm i'm
[4:13] do you agree with that do you condemn that call call hassan piker and ask what i'm what i'm here i
[4:18] don't care what hassan piker says i'm not hassan piker i don't think brian's pushing for a violent revolution
[4:22] yeah are you or no just to be clear because like where does this go now that the supreme
[4:25] court in virginia is here's where it goes it goes it goes to me me calling on every democratic
[4:30] elected official either in the legislature or the governor's office in democratic states across
[4:34] the country and demanding that they redraw maps to fight fire with fire and actually counteract
[4:38] what republicans have done in a raft of different states across the country and what they continue to
[4:43] do in southern states across the country in response to the voting rights act being gutted
[4:47] do you think that there should be a national ban on gerrymandering to try to stop this whole thing
[4:52] around the country opposed to it but i also believe that the constitution says you know 10th
[4:57] amendment what is not outlined here is left to the states and i think states have a right to decide
[5:01] their own process and that's what i'm arguing with you is the process played out here in virginia it was
[5:07] put on the ballot on a referendum directly with the voters it barely passed the language was extremely
[5:12] misleading there was an appeal it then went to the state supreme court what's the problem here checks and
[5:17] balance is played out and you you support a national ban a hundred percent and in fact uh when the
[5:23] democrats put that forward a national ban on gerrymandering in 2021 the freedom to vote act
[5:27] every single democrat voted for it every single voted democrat republican voted against you think
[5:30] the united states supreme court which has supported texas's right to do this and has supported california's
[5:36] right to do this will support virginia's right to do redistricting you think they might overturn this no
[5:42] i think that this supreme court has proven itself to be an arm of the republican party if nothing else
[5:47] and we have seen numerous instances where whether it's this u.s supreme court uh where you had a
[5:52] bunch of justices uh beat their chest about uh the importance of precedent and the voting rights act
[5:58] which is you know that that precedent has been reaffirmed over and over and over again for the past 60
[6:04] years just like roe was president that was reaffirmed over and over again the supreme court stands for its its
[6:10] own uh adherence to the republican party you think the supreme court might step in i don't think
[6:15] they're gonna hear this i don't see why they i don't see why they would again the people of virginia
[6:18] spoke and what's interesting is when this referendum was put on the ballot let's be very clear
[6:22] it disenfranchised the rights and the voices if we're talking about who got disenfranchised with a
[6:26] referendum of rural virginians this referendum transferred power from majority of the state
[6:32] which is rural virginians and consolidated it among the swamp which is people who work in dc and live in
[6:38] virginia but i didn't hear you speaking up then and by the way about the disenfranchised i would
[6:44] concede that when you have a gerrymandered map certain people are disenfranchised which is why
[6:48] this whole thing was sparked off after republicans first went after texas i didn't agree with with
[6:53] it when it happened in texas but what i don't want to see is unilateral disarmament i think gerrymandering
[6:58] is a scourge all around but if you really care about disenfranchisement then you'll care about it when
[7:04] it happens right off the bat you'll care about it when it happens in texas you'll care about it when all
[7:08] of a sudden memphis is cracked into multiple districts nashville is cracked into multiple
[7:12] districts and those people have no voting power because that's a hundred percent republican and
[7:16] that is true in california now that republicans are being disenfranchised by prop 50. but the
[7:21] difference is the districts are the districts are not it's not fair to republican voters and the idea
[7:25] of like a 52 to nothing map here is not fair just like it's not fair uh what we're seeing in in
[7:31] tennessee and other places where there's going to be no democratic representation that's bad for
[7:35] democracy correct it's terrible for democracy the difference is there's only one party that actually
[7:39] supports a nationwide ban on gerrymandering and that's the democrats revolution to be clear is
[7:43] also bad for democracy and i i either brian or myself are endorsing violent revolution just to be
[7:49] clear uh always against political violence i've said that repeatedly quickly here in los angeles there's
[7:55] a very interesting uh race happening right now for mayor karen bass the incumbent who has been
[8:01] embattled and does not have very high approval ratings right now is being challenged by spencer
[8:06] pratt a reality star known for the hills who's a republican gets a lot of attention on social media
[8:12] had a debate this week got a lot of attention for it um what do you make of of what spencer is doing
[8:19] right now he's running ads that he's getting a lot of attention for certainly a lot of republicans
[8:24] around the country who don't live in los angeles and can't vote for him are endorsing him what do you
[8:28] think of his chances to actually win in a deeply blue city i think spencer pratt could be the next
[8:33] mayor of los angeles and i'll tell you why the last time a reality television star who was politically
[8:40] incorrect ran for office he ended up all the way at 1600 pennsylvania avenue and spencer pratt is
[8:46] reminding me of the saying first they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you
[8:51] win he has all the makings i don't even have to use the donald trump example he has the charisma of
[8:57] mamdani aoc trump he has that outsider anti-establishment energy and he is good at
[9:05] harnessing attention he is running tactically speaking a very nimble agile smart campaign
[9:10] i can tell that campaign is not being governed by committee my guess is it's a very small team of
[9:15] five to six people who just like trump in 2016 are able to move a lot faster than bloated political
[9:21] consultant type campaigns and spencer you know people are saying they don't like his politically correct
[9:26] you know comments so in the debate the other night you know people said he was offensive maybe when
[9:31] he was suggesting that nithya raman go ask people who are homeless under the freeway for treatment
[9:36] they were going to get stabbed in the neck and people were really offended by that well guess
[9:39] what in venice california today we had a man get his arm sliced off with a samurai sword so spencer
[9:45] pratt it looks like is way more in touch with reality than the rest of the candidates on that quickly
[9:50] brian thoughts on spencer what could possibly go wrong with a
[9:54] long-time reality star who speaks bluntly knows how to game the media and decides that
[9:58] he wants to be a politician look i think that that would actually lose brian i think that that would
[10:02] actually i think that would actually carry more weight if donald trump's approval rating wasn't
[10:07] what it is right now and if he wasn't you know basically exposed as as a con artist for promising
[10:13] to be uh this populist champion and instead you know prices are higher for everybody health care is
[10:18] cut food assistance has been cut and we're spending god knows how many billions of dollars per day
[10:21] and a war in the middle east that he promised would never happen well in the next few weeks
[10:24] we will be talking to all the leading candidates for la mayor including spencer pratt here on the
[10:28] story is but for now thanks to caroline and brian we could keep going all night but at some point
[10:33] we got to stop thank you guys both for being here we appreciate it coming
Related Transcripts from Elex Michaelson and Brian Tyler Cohen