Try Free

Trump Takes Qs After Threatening Oman, Scaling Back Military Exercises With South Korea

Forbes Breaking News August 17, 2026 19m 3,719 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Trump Takes Qs After Threatening Oman, Scaling Back Military Exercises With South Korea from Forbes Breaking News, published August 17, 2026. The transcript contains 3,719 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Yeah, please. Are you okay? Policy question, Mr. President? Go ahead. There's a lot of debate right now about these license plate scanners that are going up across the country. They're called flop cameras. People are worried that the police might misuse them. Have you heard of them? Yep. What's..."

[0:00] Yeah, please. [0:01] Are you okay? [0:02] Policy question, Mr. President? [0:03] Go ahead. [0:04] There's a lot of debate right now about these [0:06] license plate scanners that are going up across the country. [0:09] They're called flop cameras. [0:10] People are worried that the police might misuse them. [0:13] Have you heard of them? [0:14] Yep. [0:15] What's your stance? [0:16] Well, it's being studied right now. [0:17] You know, you have pros and cons, right? [0:19] It's being studied right now. [0:20] We'll have an answer, sort of, as to our views on it [0:23] over the next couple of weeks. [0:25] Mr. President, yesterday, John Ossoff said [0:27] you'd rather travel with your aide, Natalie Harp, [0:29] and build the ballroom than do your job as president. [0:31] What is your response? [0:32] John Ossoff. [0:33] The President, you mean Pee Wee Herman? [0:36] Pee Wee Herman lookalike? [0:37] No, I would much rather do other things. [0:40] It's a — we're building a great facility here. [0:43] We're fixing a White House that hasn't been taken care of. [0:46] You can look at this. [0:47] This room was a disgraceful situation — the Oval Office. [0:50] And it was — it was let go. [0:53] The whole building, the White House, was let go. [0:56] The exteriors were falling apart. [0:58] The columns were falling apart. [1:00] The whole place was a mess. [1:01] In addition, they've been trying to get a ballroom for the last 150 years. [1:05] And when I said I was going to build a ballroom in the military yesterday, [1:08] they could see me. [1:09] And they say, sir, we have an opportunity to go down deep into the ground [1:13] and build a military facility to go to the White House [1:16] and to go with all of Washington, D.C., which would be so valuable. [1:20] And then they came up with the drone port on top, [1:23] which would be a major drone port to protect the White House and all of D.C. [1:27] And all of those things added up, and it became much more than just a ballroom. [1:30] And I said to myself, well, what an opportunity. [1:33] I mean, if I was just going to build a ballroom, I could have had it built very quickly, [1:36] because I do these — I build very well and very quickly. [1:39] We went five stories down into the ground. [1:41] We did a lot of tremendous things for the military, things that they could never get. [1:46] They said this is an opportunity that we have, because you're building the ballroom, [1:50] that if you would be willing to spend more time, we would love to be able — [1:55] we've been trying to do this at the White House for many, many years. [1:58] And they've been trying to have a ballroom at the White House for many, many years. [2:03] Now, what happened is we used to use tents. [2:06] And the tents are usually made of either plastic or plastic material or canvas. [2:10] And they wouldn't stop a .22 caliber. [2:16] They wouldn't stop anything in terms of safety. [2:18] It would be very dangerous. [2:20] And they haven't used a tent for years. [2:22] They haven't had any big — like we have President Xi coming on September 24th or so. [2:26] I think it's September 24th. [2:28] And we'd love to have 2,000 people coming to dinner and celebrating a nice evening, et cetera, et cetera. [2:35] But we only have a room that's going to hold 89 people. [2:38] And 89 people is not appropriate. [2:40] So maybe more importantly, it's totally secure with bulletproof windows, bulletproof sides. [2:46] It's drone-proof. [2:48] It's missile — every at the top of the line. [2:51] And we need it. [2:53] And especially with what's happened, unfortunately, to the world, you could say. [2:57] Yeah. [2:58] So do you believe the ball would have a bigger part of your presidency? [3:00] This morning you said you would bomb the ass out of Oman if they got in the way of reopening the Strait of Hormuz. [3:08] Would you say you're out of patience with Oman as strategic — [3:10] No, I don't think they'd behave very well, but we'd handle them very easily, just like we do others. [3:15] Based on your answer on the ball, right? [3:16] Mr. President, I have two questions. [3:19] Go ahead. [3:20] There's a report by Center Square that nearly two dozen Democratic attorney generals, months before your reelection, were basically planning already lawsuits against you. [3:29] I wanted to see what your comment is on that. [3:31] Second question — [3:32] Well, I heard about that. [3:33] I'm not surprised, because they've weaponized this country like never before. [3:37] The Democrats — or the Democrats, as they call them — they've weaponized the country like — nobody's ever seen anything like it. [3:44] When you see the reports that are coming out now that you would have never seen if I had not won the election in a landslide. [3:50] But you would have never seen it if I didn't win the election. [3:53] But the reports that you see coming out now and the kind of illegal activity that they used on the 2020 election and beyond [4:02] is — is earth-shattering. [4:04] These are very dishonest people, so I wouldn't be surprised to hear that. [4:08] Mr. President, it's on your answer. [4:10] Mr. President. [4:11] I'm sorry. [4:12] This is on D.C. [4:13] You have mentioned before that the Democrats get in again that they may eliminate the filibuster next time and make D.C. a state. [4:21] A while back, Senator Mike Lee had floated an — [4:23] It wouldn't be a state. [4:24] It wouldn't be — I mean, if we're talking about us, we have, as you know, a very radically left-person elected mayor. [4:31] Who I haven't met. [4:32] I'm sure she's very nice. [4:34] But very, very, very radical left. [4:37] And we would have to federalize D.C. [4:39] You know, we've made D.C. great. [4:41] When I got here, it was a very dangerous capital. [4:45] I would have said to Ryder, don't come. [4:47] It's too dangerous. [4:48] Now I can say you can walk down the street. [4:50] You can grab Nathaniel and all your friends. [4:52] You can walk in. [4:53] You're going to be very safe. [4:54] But if you were here a year and a half ago, the numbers were horrible. [4:58] The crime stats, the murders, the debt, the drug dealing, everything was — we have one of the safe — [5:05] We've taken it from one of the most unsafe cities in the country to as safe a city as there is. [5:11] Amazing what's happened to Washington. [5:13] And it's our capital. [5:14] We have to have a safe capital. [5:16] And we did it through a lot of different reasons, but we also put the national gun here. [5:20] But in addition to that, the cleanliness, the new grass, the graffiti's all gone. [5:27] We fixed up 82 monuments, fountains, and other things. [5:31] The places — and when you see it in six months from now, it's going to be even beyond that. [5:37] We're proud of our capital. [5:38] I think these things are important. [5:40] Whether you build — whether you do something to fix the White House where — you know, [5:45] now they've never had a real estate developer — a good one, a real good one — here before. [5:50] And they might not ever have one again. [5:52] But, you know, fixing up our great capital is a very important thing. [5:57] I think it's very important psychologically. [5:59] It's very important from the standpoint of people being able to come to the country and not get murdered in the capital. [6:06] People would come here — we had one of the worst, one of the most unsafe cities in the country. [6:11] Now we have one of the safest. [6:13] Just to finish, we have — we had a real problem with restaurants. [6:18] Nobody wanted to have restaurants, entrepreneurs, restaurant entrepreneurs. [6:21] Now you can't get space. [6:24] Every restaurant is packed. [6:25] The place is booming. [6:27] People aren't going to get mugged and raped and beat to hell and shot and killed in Washington, D.C. [6:33] One of the safest places. [6:35] Crime is down 84 percent. [6:37] And I did that in a short period of time. [6:40] It's also down in Memphis, where we went specifically. [6:43] And it's also down in New Orleans. [6:46] I was asked by the governor, could I do something? [6:48] Because they were having Mardi Gras. [6:49] It was very bad. [6:50] And they're the best Mardi Gras they've ever had. [6:52] The safest Mardi Gras that they've ever had. [6:55] And we could do it in New York. [6:57] We could do it in California. [6:58] We could do it in Chicago if we were asked to do it. [7:00] But the crime stats in the whole country, we have down 15, 16, 70 percent. [7:06] A record. [7:07] Mr. President, on South Korea. [7:09] Mr. President, on South Korea. [7:10] Why hasn't Kim Jong-un responded to your request to have a conversation? [7:15] How do you know he hasn't responded? [7:17] Has he? [7:18] Yeah, he has. [7:21] Did you speak to him? [7:22] Did you speak to him before you made the announcement yesterday? [7:24] Mr. President, where are you in conversation? [7:25] I'm very positive. [7:26] Well, just so you understand what South Korea is. [7:28] Look, South Korea has been protected by us for many, many years. [7:33] And during my first term, they agreed to pay close to $3 billion a year for protection. [7:39] Because we don't, you know, they essentially weren't there. [7:42] And I asked them to do that. [7:43] At my request, I said, not right. [7:45] They weren't happy about it, but they agreed. [7:48] I asked for $10 billion. [7:50] And they were very unhappy. [7:54] But we agreed for short term that it would be $3 billion. [7:57] And the next year it would go up, and the next year it would go up. [7:59] So they start paying for their protection. [8:01] When the election was rigged, and I ended up watching for four years and then coming back, [8:06] I watched Biden rescind that $3 billion a year for whatever reason. [8:12] When I called recently President of South Korea, who I like, I think he's very nice, actually. [8:18] But I called him. [8:19] I said, would you like to give us a little hand? [8:21] We don't need help with Iran. [8:22] But if you'd like, give us a hand with Iran. [8:26] He said, no thanks. [8:27] And I said, wait a minute. [8:28] We have 39,000 soldiers over there guarding you from Kim Jong-un, your next door neighbor. [8:36] And you're not going to help us on a very easy military operation in Iran? [8:42] That's strange. [8:43] No, no, we'd rather not get involved. [8:45] I said, well, why are we involved in helping you? [8:48] So, and I want to help them. [8:50] But, you know, when you ask somebody, would you like to give us a hand? [8:55] They say, no thanks. [8:56] And then we're guarding them from a country and paying ourselves billions of dollars. [9:02] It's costing us billions and billions of dollars to protect. [9:05] Not only them, but other countries. [9:07] Look at NATO. [9:08] We spend hundreds of billions of dollars protecting Europe from Russia. [9:16] Hundreds of billions mostly from Russia, but from other things, too. [9:19] And then they say, well, they don't want to get involved with getting, you know, guarding the strait. [9:26] Where they get most of their oil. [9:27] They get 50% of their oil. [9:29] And they don't want to get involved. [9:30] Why are we doing it? [9:31] So, all I want is fairness. [9:33] And South Korea, I get along with them very well. [9:35] But they were paying $3 billion a year. [9:38] And then they convinced Biden that I was probably a bad person. [9:42] And they shouldn't, and he immediately rescinded that order. [9:45] So, we were getting paid. [9:46] We would have been getting paid a lot more. [9:48] But we can't go around and protect all of these countries. [9:53] Especially when they're not there to help us. [9:55] Did you seek to conduct a memorandum of understanding? [10:00] On the expiration of a memorandum of understanding, are you any closer today to reaching a final deal to end Iran's new program? [10:06] Well, they want to make a deal, but they're not going to make the kind of a deal that I feel is necessary. [10:11] Look, we're in there for one reason. [10:13] Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. [10:17] You understand that? [10:18] Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. [10:20] And they won't have a nuclear weapon. [10:22] Right now, them building one after what we did previously with the B-2 bombers, it could be a long time we have. [10:30] But Iran cannot have it. [10:32] It's very simple. [10:33] They can't have a nuclear weapon. [10:34] Mr. President. [10:35] Mr. President of South Korea. [10:36] How do you respond to folks who say that you are prioritizing the interests of adversaries in North Korea over our long time? [10:43] No, just the opposite. [10:44] No. [10:45] I'm making it much safer. [10:47] You see, I'm actually making it much safer. [10:50] Kim Jong-un has always treated me with great respect. [10:54] And we met on numerous occasions, actually, two primary occasions. [10:59] Spoken and spent time. [11:04] I understand him. [11:05] He understands me. [11:06] You're doing war games. [11:08] I get along with him. [11:10] You know, he didn't like Biden. [11:11] He didn't like Obama. [11:13] He didn't like anybody. [11:15] But I get along with him very well. [11:17] No, what I'm doing is making things safer. [11:19] Did he ask you specifically to scale back on those? [11:24] Quiet. [11:25] Quiet. [11:26] You're very disrespectful in front of this young man. [11:27] Okay? [11:28] Don't you find her disrespectful? [11:30] He understands. [11:31] Quiet. [11:32] Who are you with? [11:33] I'm with CNN. [11:34] Fake news. [11:35] I just wanted to follow up on the South Korea question. [11:38] You're a loud, boisterous person. [11:40] You're fake news. [11:41] Be quiet. [11:42] Be quiet. [11:43] You're a fake reporter and you report fake news. [11:44] Go ahead. [11:45] Mr. President, is there enough food on the USS Lincoln? [11:46] Yeah, it is. [11:47] That was a CNN fake report. [11:48] The Lincoln has been out there for a period of time, a good period of time. [12:04] But over the years, we've had him out there much longer. [12:06] I was at a group meeting and an admiral came up to see me over the weekend. [12:11] And it was at a big group and he happened to be an admiral retired. [12:15] He said, I've been on ships that are out there much longer than that, sir. [12:18] And I know people on the Lincoln, they say it's beautifully maintained and beautifully taken care of. [12:24] And other people went out and they found out to be true. [12:26] It was fake news reporting from CNN. [12:29] Mr. President, Mr. President. [12:31] There's a report that a senior intelligence official with the CCP just bought a historical building overlooking the White House. [12:37] Have you heard about this? [12:39] No, I haven't heard of that. [12:40] Mr. President. [12:41] Mr. President, yes. [12:42] Mr. President. [12:43] Mr. President. [12:44] Mr. President. [12:45] Go ahead. [12:46] Behind you. [12:47] Behind you, please. [12:48] The British Prime Minister recently, reportedly, sent texts to someone impersonating Susie Wiles. [12:52] Are you concerned about his judgment or the state of communications between the two countries? [12:57] No, but who happened? [12:58] What happened? [12:59] They sent texts? [13:00] Apparently, the Prime Minister sent texts to somebody impersonating Susie Wiles. [13:05] I'm sure that he had a miscommunication. [13:10] Mr. President. [13:11] Mr. President. [13:12] He's the Prime Minister. [13:13] Mr. President. [13:14] When I spoke to him, we had a good conversation. [13:15] A couple of them. [13:16] We had a good conversation. [13:17] One of the things he is going to do, I think he's going to open up the North Sea. [13:21] That'll make, that'll make UK pretty rich, I'll tell you. [13:26] Mr. President. [13:27] If he opened up the North Sea, now he's got an immigration problem, and he has an energy [13:32] problem. [13:33] He would have solved one of his problems. [13:34] That would be a big thing. [13:35] That would make UK rich. [13:36] If you open up the North Sea, it's one of the great finds anywhere in the world. [13:41] And if they would open up, the North Sea UK would be rich again. [13:44] Mr. President. [13:45] Mr. President. [13:46] Mr. President. [13:47] Yes, Mr. President. [13:48] Have the people, the people who... [13:49] Don't you find them nice? [13:50] Huh? [13:51] Nice people. [13:52] Right? [13:53] Let me say, where do people like this come from? [13:56] Go ahead. [13:57] The people who are opposing... [13:58] Especially here. [13:59] The people who are opposing the ballroom and challenging it, have they offered any sort [14:03] of solution or sort of compromise, or are they just saying there should be a role there? [14:12] The people that are opposing the ballroom are people that, in my opinion, are very disloyal [14:17] to our country. [14:18] Very, very disloyal to our country. [14:21] And I think we're doing very well. [14:22] We're way ahead of schedule. [14:24] We're under budget. [14:25] It's going to be the most beautiful ballroom of its kind. [14:28] You know, when I was in China, we went to the Great Hall of China. [14:31] It was a big, beautiful building. [14:32] And we don't have anything like that. [14:34] And we have to have that. [14:35] It's very important. [14:36] But we also are getting tremendous military protection. [14:40] Drone protection. [14:41] The building is drone-proof. [14:43] It's missile-proof, as much as something can be missile-proof. [14:47] It's totally bulletproof. [14:48] Any bullet, nothing can go through the windows. [14:51] We have, you know, all top-of-the-line stuff. [14:54] It's very safe. [14:56] And, you know, the one thing, it's not for me. [14:59] Because I'm going to be here a very short period of time when it's finished. [15:02] If it finishes right on time, on budget, on time, I'll be there for four, five, six months. [15:10] This is for future presidents. [15:11] This isn't for me. [15:12] This is for future presidents. [15:14] And it's a gift. [15:15] We're making a gift to our country, spending hundreds of millions of dollars to build a ballroom. [15:21] And it's a gift from great patriots of this country, from, as an example, I mean, I'll give you names. [15:28] I released some of the names. [15:30] In fact, I wanted to put them out today, but we got a little busy. [15:33] And this was, frankly, being with this group of people was very important to me. [15:37] But we'll be putting them out, some of the people that contributed. [15:40] But this is a gift to the United States of America. [15:43] No taxpayer money is necessary. [15:46] And you're going to have the finest ballroom anywhere in the world. [15:50] It's not something I wanted to do, but it's something that's needed. [15:53] And again, I'm not going to get to use it very much. [15:57] Because by the time it's completed, I'll have four or five months left, three months, who knows. [16:01] But we're ahead of schedule. [16:03] It's going to be the best in the world, of its kind, in the world. [16:06] There'll be nothing like it in the world. [16:08] It fits beautifully with the White House. [16:11] It's gotten fantastic reviews, architectural reviews. [16:14] People think it's incredible. [16:16] And when you see it, you'll say, wow, that's really something. [16:19] And that's what the United States is all about. [16:21] We have to have that. [16:22] But in addition to the ballroom, we're building a great military complex. [16:26] The people that started the lawsuit, the head person, I believe, was fired. [16:32] And she was fired from another event just before that. [16:35] And she's the one that started it. [16:37] It's a national trust. [16:38] But the National Trust for Historic Preservation. [16:41] Now, they say it's a United States. [16:44] They use the word United States. [16:45] But it's not related to the United States. [16:47] In fact, the United States doesn't even contribute to it. [16:50] It has nothing to do with it. [16:52] It stopped contributing when they realized there were nothing but troublemakers. [16:56] Years ago, it stopped contributing. [16:58] So this isn't like an official United States Bureau or United States agency. [17:04] They stopped contributing to the National Trust. [17:08] And it's called the National Trust. [17:10] It has this great name, National Trust for Historic Preservation. [17:14] There are a bunch of troublemakers that the United States, many years ago, long before me, stopped contributing to. [17:21] The woman that started it was fired. [17:24] She's no longer there. [17:25] So this is the remnants of it. [17:27] And the bottom line is they're trying to stop something. [17:30] And they won't be successful. [17:32] But they're trying to stop something that's almost completed. [17:35] When you say, when you say, when they brought a suit, why didn't they bring the suit a year before? [17:40] Why did they bring the suit in the middle of construction? [17:43] When $400 million almost is spent on its construction. [17:50] Why wouldn't they have started the suit a year earlier? [17:52] Everybody knew it was going to be. [17:53] I mean, it was no secret. [17:55] Everybody knew that it was taking place. [17:57] So they should have done that. [17:58] But the National Trust is very disloyal to the country because they reveal things. [18:03] You know, I said the problem with the suit, I told them this, is that we have many military things in this ballroom. [18:09] And ideally, they shouldn't be revealed. [18:11] But now they are revealed, so the world knows about it. [18:13] That's okay. [18:14] They shouldn't have done it. [18:15] They're very disloyal. [18:16] But I think we're doing really well. [18:21] We're way ahead of schedule. [18:23] And somebody and many presidents are going to use it for many years to come. [18:27] The country will have one of the greatest gifts it's ever received. [18:30] Mr. President, I'm the ballroom. [18:32] Last week you said that you would soon declare the Strait of Hormuz to be a territory of the United States. [18:38] Could you elaborate? [18:39] Well, I just think it's a great idea. [18:41] Yeah. [18:42] I mean, we control it. [18:43] We control it with the blockade. [18:44] We have a blockade. [18:45] We control it with the blockade. [18:47] And I like the idea of declaring it a territory. [18:51] When might we do that? [18:52] We have total control over the Strait. [18:54] Now, they can be a nuisance. [18:55] They can put a mine in the water. [18:57] And people don't like having mines hit their billion-dollar ships, you know, et cetera. [19:00] But the blockade has been very effective. [19:03] And, you know, we're taking out — now, maybe that will stop or maybe it'll open up even further. [19:08] But we're taking out millions of barrels of oil a week. [19:12] If you look at the kind of numbers that we're doing, we're doing — the Strait is open. [19:17] And the oil prices are coming down, and they will continue to come down unless we decide to do something far more drastic than we're doing. [19:25] Iran is in big trouble. [19:27] They have 300 percent inflation. [19:30] The country is a mess. [19:32] And the military is totally defeated. [19:34] Thank you very much. [19:35] Mr. President, are you seeking an extension on the MOU? [19:38] Thank you. [19:39] Mr. President, are you seeking an extension on the MOU? [19:42] Thank you so much, guys.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →