🚨Bondi FULL Transcript EXPOSES Trump EPSTEIN COVER UP!!!

[0:00] so the interview transcript of pam bondi before the house oversight committee was released [0:05] yesterday it's 111 pages i went through each and every page the cover-up is worse than you can even [0:14] imagine i want to go through with you the entire 111 pages i'll do it in an abbreviated form [0:23] together but it's really important that we read the words of bondi read the words of the doj lawyer [0:31] who was in the room with her here and take a look at the questions that were being asked of bondi [0:38] by democrats in the house oversight committee by the lawyers in the house oversight committee [0:43] so you can see the extent of the cover-up taking place just to quickly remind you pam bondi was [0:50] subpoenaed by the house oversight committee where she had to show up and testify under oath she [0:57] refused to testify under oath instead she cut a deal with james comer a mega republican who heads the house [1:05] oversight committee to convert the subpoena of bondi into a quote voluntary interview where there would [1:13] not be any video camera taping her and where she would not be under oath instead there were [1:20] just be a transcribed interview also she was present with a top department of justice lawyer the number [1:30] two or number three at the doj somebody named harmeet dylan who was there who kept on objecting to the [1:39] questions being asked by democrats on the house oversight committee and refusing to have pam bondi answer [1:48] very basic questions and then so pam bondi would follow the lead of that doj lawyer and refuse to [1:56] answer very basic questions so when i read this 111 page transcript pam bondi refused to answer any [2:07] questions about her communications with donald trump or anybody in the executive branch she claims those are [2:15] executive privilege communications so she won't talk about any communications with donald trump [2:22] whatsoever and i'll show you it's on the most sensitive aspects of the cover-up of the epstein files [2:30] it is on the crux of everything so we'll go through that in addition pam bondi through the doj lawyer [2:38] refused to answer any questions that predate pam bondi's time as attorney general so if pam bondi knew about [2:49] donald trump's relationships and connections with epstein before she was ag for example if donald trump [2:57] told her during the campaign in 2024 hey i need you to cover this up for me if i win she refused to answer [3:04] those questions and said the time limitation for this deposition starts when i become the attorney [3:11] general so there's a time limitation when i'm ag and i won't answer any questions before that then i [3:16] won't answer any questions about communications with donald trump or anybody in the executive branch [3:23] and then where it didn't fall into those categories pam bondi would just say i don't recall [3:31] on the most critical issues so when pam bondi was asked did you specifically try to flag donald trump's [3:39] name in the epstein files to segregate and destroy documents that have donald trump's name on it right [3:46] a pretty big deal where you would think one would recall if you were intentionally destroying epstein files [3:55] with trump's name on it right we all agree big deal this isn't a partisan thing democrat republican [4:00] independent she says i don't recall whether i ordered people to destroy documents videos photos with [4:11] donald trump on it i just don't recall if we were looking for trump's name specifically to flag those [4:17] documents videos and photos to destroy him i don't recall this is why though the exercise we're about to [4:25] go through together is important because when you watch news programs and you see the debates back [4:34] and forth there's a lot of yelling and a lot of hyperbolic language but it's like for for me and maybe [4:43] you feel the same it's like look can you just go through the document with me so i can see for myself [4:49] and verify that what you're telling me is the truth and then let me form my opinions once you explain to [4:57] me and show me the document the transcript the photos the videos show it to me ben show it to me whoever [5:07] right that's what we're going to do so let's take a look at the transcript you see right here friday may [5:13] 29 20 20 26 the interview in the above matter was held at the ray burn house office building at 9 0 5 a.m [5:22] you had representatives comer garcia kana stands very frost lee subramaniam ansari min and walk-inshaw [5:30] there you see interview of pam bondi it should be deposition of pam bondi but they made it into just a [5:37] interview and so that's what we're going to be going through i want to jump ahead then we'll go back [5:43] but i want to jump ahead to the meat of it right here so let's go to page 44 43 and over here on page [5:53] 43 and 44 we start seeing these objections being raised by this doj lawyer and pam bondi refusing to [6:03] answer questions so the lawyer for the minority for the house dems starts asking these questions and the [6:12] doj lawyer is harmeet dylan miss dylan says the following because we want clear testimony coming [6:21] from the department of justice concerning what any witness from the department of justice and that is [6:27] the basis on which the witness is here concerning her tenure as attorney general and so that's the [6:33] scope that we've agreed to today the witness is perfect then the lawyer goes the witness is perfectly [6:39] capable it sounds like of saying she's not sure if she's not sure so i'm not following why that would [6:45] be some kind of insurmountable problem and then harmeet dylan says you're not going to dictate the [6:52] objections that i make but you can ask your questions and i will instruct the witness to answer or not [7:00] accordingly because she is here on behalf of the united states department of justice because her [7:07] testimony is concerning that time question yeah it's kind of a non sequitur but yes i agree but i'm [7:14] going to set up the way that this is reflected on the record just so we get that clarified so miss bondi [7:21] with respect to exhibit b i just provided and if you don't mind it sounds like if you could get a little [7:27] closer to the microphone there's been some problems so with respect to exhibit b who are the 10 individual [7:34] co-conspirators of mr epstein reflected in this 2019 email who are the co-conspirators right that's a big [7:44] question that we would want answered from bondi right who are the 10 co-conspirators of epstein you know [7:52] it you're hiding it these names are redacted tell us the doj lawyer says miss dylan says she's not going to [8:01] answer that then the lawyer for the dem says miss bondi are you refusing to answer that question miss [8:08] bondi may i have a moment to confer then they go off the record they go off the record and then [8:13] bondi goes i don't recall ever reviewing that document so i don't know who's in it and that came from the [8:21] fbi new york i just don't recall they go from instruct not to answer to i don't recall let's go to page [8:30] 46 question what is your understanding of the extent to which president trump was aware of jeffrey epstein [8:38] or gilane maxwell's crimes prior to the crime is becoming public so when nobody else answer from [8:46] bondi i'm not certain of the extent of his knowledge question okay during your tenure did president trump [8:56] direct you or any of your subordinates to take any official action related to jeffrey epstein or [9:04] gilane maxwell a very basic question did trump direct you bondi or anyone who works for you bondi [9:13] to take any action related to epstein or maxwell right that's one of the main questions we all want [9:19] to know answer from bondi i'm not going to discuss any conversations that i've had with the president [9:26] of the united states question it would be helpful for us just to understand whether that's just a [9:31] refusal to discuss full stop or whether that's an invocation of some version of executive privilege [9:38] answer privilege question and can you or counsel elaborate a little bit on the nature of the privilege [9:46] for the record then the doj lawyer harmeet dylan says we're not going to get into any conversations [9:54] that the former attorney general had with other senior members of the executive members of the [10:00] white house and the immediate staff of the president that's covered by privilege then another lawyer at [10:06] the doj says i'll also add we don't need to formally assert the privilege in this context given the [10:13] voluntary nature of these proceedings so we're just going to refuse to provide answers about conversations [10:21] with the president or his advisors just think about the arrogance there because this is voluntary [10:29] and it's not an under oath deposition well it should be an under oath deposition with a video camera [10:34] and then the lawyers for bondi say we don't even have to tell you why we're not going to answer [10:41] questions about whether donald trump directed you bondi or your subordinates to cover up the epstein files [10:48] we don't have to give any answer we're just going to say we don't answer again i'm not being hyperbolic [10:53] i'm reading you what's in the transcript right here then harmeet dylan goes on to say this is a [10:59] voluntary interview and assertion of privilege is not legally required and so just telling you what's [11:06] out of bounds you're not going to get answers on those issues then the lawyer for the democrat says [11:13] it's just a choice not to answer that question correct harmeet dylan i'm not testifying here [11:20] so i'd say i think you can go ahead and just ask your next question then the lawyer for the dem says [11:26] well we'll just clarify with the witness thank you that's a great point question that's just a choice [11:32] on the witnesses part to simply not answer questions in the category you describe which is [11:38] conversations with the president or his close advisors is that correct answer and i've said [11:44] that in the past on multiple range of topics but that's the case today answer yes we go to page 48 [11:51] question did president trump ever tell you that he had friends who could be exposed as abusers [11:58] by the epstein files being released bondi's answer i'm not going to discuss any conversations [12:05] that i've had with the president on any manner question there may be time i'll try to minimize [12:11] it but there may be times where it's appropriate for you to say that again for the record and i [12:16] appreciate your patience i'd like to discuss some chronicle chronological events starting with [12:22] president trump's 2024 campaign during that campaign then candidate trump promised to release the epstein [12:28] files did you speak with then candidate trump or any of his advisors about jeffrey epstein or [12:34] gilane maxwell during the 2024 presidential campaign answer not to my knowledge but again [12:41] he wasn't president then the lawyer for the doj harmeet dylan says it's beyond the scope of this [12:48] interview then pan bondi goes and yeah it's beyond the scope you see how she's being coached by the doj [12:54] lawyer to not answer any questions before 2024 then after 2024 every objection is made on executive [13:02] privilege then they go you know what this is an involuntary interview so we don't even need to [13:06] tell you what the basis of our objection is either let's keep on reading the next question is um i'll [13:14] redo the question it's whether during the 2024 presidential campaigns whether you miss bondi had [13:20] any conversations with then candidate trump or his advisors about jeffrey epstein or gilane maxwell doj [13:28] lawyer harmeet dylan says and to repeat the witness is here voluntarily to talk about her time [13:34] as attorney general and that is an overarching limitation so that we cannot be here all day [13:40] and those are the ground rules that we agree to when we came here so that is our limitation your [13:45] question goes beyond that i'm just noting that for the witness democratic lawyer just to be clear [13:51] for the record we never agreed to that or were informed of that doj lawyer harmeet dylan fine [13:58] democrat lawyer and separately it would be helpful for me to understand with the question relating to [14:04] candidate trump is that still part of the previously described concern of not discussing conversations [14:11] with donald trump or president trump in other words is it no conversations with him at any time [14:17] whether or not he was in office the doj lawyer harmeet dylan says this is a separate limitation [14:23] regarding the a temporal limitation which has previously been articulated to you her testimony [14:29] here today is limited to what she said or did during the time as the attorney general and then [14:37] it goes on to say you seemed and then harmeet dylan the doj lawyer says you seem determined to eat up [14:43] all your time repeating yourself that's your choice but she's going to stick to the limits that have been [14:49] articulated this is my commentary here the limitations that you just made up that she's refusing to answer [14:57] questions before 2024 or 2024 or before and then after she refuses to answer any questions about [15:04] communications with donald trump do you all see why they did not want this under oath and why they did [15:10] not want this on video camera could you imagine how bad bondi looked and all of these doj cover uppers [15:18] looked when this was going on like can you imagine just and they this is why they're hiding this from us [15:23] that's why i'm doing the tedious task of going through this transcript with us because we need [15:28] to see what's happening right here question so when president trump was a candidate during the 2024 [15:34] presidential campaign did you have any discussions with him or his close advisors about epstein or [15:40] maxwell harmeet dylan it's beyond the scope so pam bondi it's beyond the scope so i was subpoenaed [15:47] as attorney general or asked to come in as attorney general uh okay i i don't want to lose all [15:53] day but in what sense do you view it as a witness as beyond the scope i was not the attorney general [16:00] at the time bondi says question okay you were sworn in as attorney general february 5th of last year [16:06] when was your first conversation with president trump about the epstein investigation answer i don't [16:12] discuss any conversations whether i've had them or not had them with the president of the united states [16:19] okay wasn't that page so revealing there i'm not going to answer anything before 2024 or 2024 or before [16:27] question okay so when was the first conversation you had with donald trump after 24 i'm not going to [16:34] answer that whether i had a conversation or not okay then what's the point of any of this what's the [16:40] point of any of this when this is your behavior and again i don't care what political party you're [16:45] from or no political party this should make you livid because it's making me livid this should [16:51] make everybody living page 51 question the wall street journal has reported that you told president [16:58] trump last may he was in the epstein files and that the department of justice did not plan to release [17:04] any more epstein files deputy attorney general blanche was also reportedly in that meeting what did [17:11] president trump say when you told him he was in the files answer i won't discuss any conversation that [17:17] i had or did not have with the president of the united states page 54 the month prior in june elon [17:25] musk had tweeted that quote time to drop the really big bomb real donald trump is in the epstein files and [17:32] that's the real reason they have not been made public did you pan bondi have any conversation with any [17:39] agency or administration staff about that tweet answer i'm not going to discuss any conversation [17:45] that i had within the department or the administration okay so not only are you not going [17:51] to discuss any conversations you had with trump you're not going to discuss any conversations you had [17:59] with anybody okay the time limitation before 2024 not discussing it 2025 and after not discussing it [18:08] because i'm not discussing my communications because i'm just here for a voluntary interview [18:14] i'm not here under a subpoena you are here under a subpoena just because james comer converted this to [18:20] an involuntary interview and now do you see how these people take advantage of this i mean it's [18:25] ridiculous another question okay elon musk another elon musk tweet mr musk said it's time to drop the really [18:33] big bomb the question was just whether you had any conversation with subordinates colleagues about the [18:38] tweet doj lawyer harmeet dylan the question calls for communication that she's already said she's not [18:46] going to testify about and she's already answered that so and the democratic lawyer says i definitely [18:54] don't think it does but can you help me understand in what sense in other words it's not a conversation [18:59] with the president it's during her time as attorney general so why aren't you answering we're just not [19:06] answering the question then you had democratic congress members start asking questions like [19:11] democratic congress member garcia here was his question page 56 miss bondi thank you for being [19:17] here again and again we just want to reiterate we wish you a full speedy recovery thank you for being [19:22] here miss bondi a couple of questions i want to start first there's been reporting that indicates that [19:27] you informed trump in may 2025 that his name appeared multiple times in the epstein files that were [19:33] reviewed by the doj a couple of months later on july 7th of 2025 which was discussed earlier the doj [19:40] and fbi released a memo saying that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted we [19:46] just discussed that now looking at the conversation that was reported back in may why did you tell [19:51] president trump he was in the files miss bondi answer i'm not going to discuss any conversation i did [19:58] or did not have with the president of the united states and i've said that multiple times on [20:04] multiple topics throughout my tenure congressman garcia what was president trump's reaction when [20:10] you had that conversation with him no response then the doj lawyer says asked and answered then [20:16] garcia says did president trump at any time tell you not to disclose that he was in the file doj lawyer [20:23] harmeet dylan asked and answered asked and answered meaning we're not answering the question that you're [20:29] asking we're just going to say we're not answering it just because and again they think because they're [20:35] not on video and they're not under oath and they release the transcript later that they just get away [20:41] with it that's their plan behind all of this then garcia goes okay can we talk about gilane maxwell [20:48] it's clear that you're not answering any questions about donald trump about any conversation with [20:52] president trump what he may have directed you to do is that correct bondi i'm not going to answer [20:58] any questions any questions that i've had with the president whether we had them or didn't have them [21:03] or the substance congress member garcia so let's look at the handling of gilane maxwell [21:09] obviously a convicted sex trafficker she was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison you earlier [21:15] today called her evil we can agree on that i wonder just to clarify miss bondi do you think [21:21] miss maxwell deserves a pardon for her crimes no garcia but will you acknowledge that she was [21:27] moved to a less secure facility bondi no i have no knowledge of that you have no knowledge that she [21:35] was sent to a less secure facility everybody knows that you know that i know that you as the [21:40] attorney general didn't know that she was sent to a less secure facility here's what bondi said look [21:45] at line 20 no because i have no knowledge of that garcia okay i do want to make sure we get that [21:52] exhibit out but that is the case she was moved to a less secure facility did you know if acting [21:57] attorney general todd blanche ordered the move to the less secure facility bondi i have no knowledge of [22:03] that garcia did you ever ask anyone to move gilane maxwell to a different prison bondi as i stated [22:11] earlier i knew she was moved when i read it i guess online or i saw it garcia okay did you talk [22:18] to acting attorney general blanche after you read it online dylan on any topic garcia on the actual [22:25] move gilane maxwell to the less secure facility bondi i don't recall i would direct that to the bureau [22:32] of prisons i don't recall you don't recall if you spoke to todd blanche about gilane maxwell again [22:41] that's where they go when there's no now they just go i don't recall critical facts okay i think [22:46] obviously the move gilane maxwell to less secure facility was everywhere was like being discussed [22:53] in the news a massive obvious move that the bureau of prison ended up making under whose direction we [22:59] still have yet to have an answer on garcia perhaps the question also should be directed to the bureau [23:05] of prisons and todd blanche answer yes then you had maxwell frost he asked his questions okay he goes [23:12] she goes back to gilane maxwell because you're not going to answer on trump are you aware of president [23:17] trump was informed about the transfer before it happened bondi i'm not going to discuss any [23:23] conversations that i've had or did not have with the president of the united states on this topic or [23:28] others maxwell frost yes i understand that but it's not about a conversation that you might have [23:34] had with him my question is are you aware if he knew about it bondi i'm not going to discuss any [23:40] conversations that i've had or didn't have with the president of the united states miss dylan so if [23:47] members are chewing up their time repeating themselves that's not our problem pam bondi and i'm not aware [23:53] of the president having any knowledge of it whether it be from reading it in the paper [23:58] or people reporting that he did or didn't talk to anyone about it i have no knowledge maxwell frost [24:05] okay did anyone in the administration ever express concern about the transfer or urge the briso of the [24:12] bureau of prisons to reverse it bondi i'm not going to discuss any conversations that i had or didn't [24:19] have with the administration then we have congress member subramanian who says uh right were you looking [24:26] at anything in particular in the files no subarmania and there's rumors of an effort potentially to look [24:32] through the files for president trump's name in particular are you aware of any sort of effort at the [24:38] department or anywhere else in the administration doing that bondi i'm not going to discuss anything [24:44] within the department or discuss what did or didn't take place how about that objection i'm not going [24:51] to discuss anything within the department so again you're not discussing anything that predates your [24:57] time as the attorney general and then now you're saying you will not discuss anything within the [25:03] department so what is the point of any of this and for bondi and trump and maga they go high five [25:11] this is what we wanted she's not answering any questions we just did a written transcript the american [25:18] people are going to forget about it the american people aren't going to forget about it that's why [25:23] you and i are taking this tedious detour going through this line by line so we can see what's [25:30] actually happening here bondi i'm not going to discuss anything within the department subramanian [25:36] i'm asking about your knowledge of any sort of effort to do that not any discussion about what [25:42] happened bondi i'm not going to discuss any conversation that did or did not happen regarding [25:48] that subramanian i'm not asking for any questions answer i'm not responding okay subramanian says but [25:56] what i'm asking though is before the release of the files during the process of releasing the epstein [26:01] files was there any effort to look through for president trump's name or any administration [26:09] officials name before the release of the files bondi's answer i don't recall subramanian and are you [26:17] aware of any effort to do that you don't recall bondi i don't recall okay subramanian it's not about [26:25] what's in the files i'm asking any effort to look for president trump or any other administration [26:32] officials name in the files up to the release of the files and in the process of releasing him was [26:38] there an effort to find donald trump's name in there bondi i don't recall subramanian congress [26:44] member goes you don't recall okay well there you have it folks i can keep going on but i think you [26:50] get the point here i'll mention this just so you can see how it was that the doj lawyer uh introduced [26:59] herself uh so you can just see for yourself like in what capacity harmeet dylan says i'm harmeet dylan [27:06] the assistant attorney general for civil rights and i'm here on behalf of the united states department of [27:12] justice as the former attorney general was subpoenaed and is appearing here voluntarily in her [27:18] official capacity and accordingly i am here to represent the interests of the doj and its interest [27:26] in effectuating the transparency act and solely to be here on behalf of the doj so they viewed this [27:34] as furthering the transparency act i'll let you be the judge after i just read through the transcript [27:43] we spent a half hour doing this together if this is furthering the interest of the transparency act [27:50] if this is furthering the interests of the survivors or if this is inflicting more ptsd on the survivors [27:59] and if this is more of the cover-up you decide hit subscribe this is what we do here on the midas touch [28:09] dark that wasn't an easy task we just did that was tedious right that was that was work we this is [28:16] what we do this is what i teach my associates when i was a lawyer this is what i teach my law students [28:21] when i'm a professor at usc we go through it line by line together we struggle with it we grapple with it [28:28] but we understand what's happening knowledge is power that we have to get at the truth and that's [28:33] what we're doing by reading these transcripts together even if it took us 30 minutes to do [28:39] it's important let me know what you think hit subscribe let's get to 7 million subscribers [28:44] thanks for watching thanks for watching be sure to add the midas touch podcast on apple podcast [28:49] spotify or wherever you get your podcasts for new updates every single day