Try Free

Bernie Sanders’ Brutal Question for Scott Bessent — And He Never Answered

Nexa Politics July 5, 2026 14m 2,262 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Bernie Sanders’ Brutal Question for Scott Bessent — And He Never Answered from Nexa Politics, published July 5, 2026. The transcript contains 2,262 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"do come on you're smarter than that this is the top two tenths of one percent this is not a mom and pop store these are multi-billionaires and the savings go to their kids after they pass away this is nothing more than a gift to billionaires in this country well sir that's just not correct because..."

[0:00] do come on you're smarter than that this is the top two tenths of one percent this is not a mom [0:05] and pop store these are multi-billionaires and the savings go to their kids after they pass away [0:11] this is nothing more than a gift to billionaires in this country well sir that's just not correct [0:18] because the the top 10 percent paid a bigger share of taxes after i'm talking about one [0:24] provision in this i don't want to argue with you about taxes in general one provision few [0:29] hundred families 235 billion dollars in tax what exploded in this hearing was bigger than one [0:34] angry exchange it was a collision between two completely different stories about the american [0:39] economy on one side treasury secretary scott besant arrived to sell trump's tax and budget agenda [0:46] as a plan for growth investment and main street prosperity on the other bernie sanders and [0:53] elizabeth warren framed it as something far more brutal a bill that protects concentrated wealth [0:59] while pushing millions closer to medical and financial insecurity and sanders opened with [1:04] the most politically lethal question in the room in an administration already packed with extreme wealth [1:11] why does this bill seem to ask ordinary americans to sacrifice while the richest families cash in [1:18] uh help me out here my understanding is the trump administration has i think 13 billionaires [1:24] uh in office right now leading government agencies is that about right do you think i i have no idea [1:30] senator i think that's what the number is do you think it's a coincidence given the large number of [1:36] billionaires in the trump administration that this particular piece of legislation would provide 235 billion [1:43] dollars in tax breaks to the top two tenths of one percent by expanding the exemptions in the estate tax [1:53] senator i will tell you that when the 2017 tax cuts and job act passed my tax rate went up well i don't [2:01] know your exact situation but i can tell you tell me about how many people do you think are in the top [2:08] two tenths of one percent sorry number of people in the top two tenths of one percent who would benefit [2:14] from this particular 235 billion dollar tax break well are the top i know the top 10 percent is now [2:23] now paying seven percent that's not the question my question is why do you think at a time of [2:30] unprecedented income and wealth inequality when people like yourself economically have never ever had [2:37] it so good why do you think it's a good idea to cut medicaid for low income and working class people by [2:43] 700 billion dollars to give 235 billion dollars in tax breaks to the very very very richest people in [2:51] this country perhaps a few hundred families please justify that and tell me about that well senator i i [2:56] don't know but the democrats had the trifecta and there was no tax increase or wealth tax on [3:02] billionaires you choose i'm not talking about a tax you you chose not that's the best thing i am not [3:06] talking about a wealth tax explain a few hundred of the wealthiest families in this country 235 billion [3:15] dollar tax break explain to the american people why you think that's a great idea i think that this [3:22] will increase small businesses substantially that most small businesses they are zero to do come on you're [3:32] smarter than that this is the top two tenths of one percent this is not a mom-and-pop store these are [3:37] multi-billionaires and the savings go to their kids after they pass away this is nothing more than a gift [3:45] to billionaires in this country well sir that's just not correct because the the top 10 percent paid [3:52] a bigger share of taxes after i'm talking about one provision in this i don't want to argue with you [3:57] about taxes in general one provision few hundred families 235 billion dollars in tax breaks you can't [4:04] justify that because morally it is totally unjustifiable let me ask another question if you guys [4:10] want to cut a trillion dollars in medicaid and the affordable care act the estimate from cbo i believe [4:18] is that over 15 million people lose their health insurance uh yale university university of pennsylvania [4:24] estimated that when you throw that many low-income and working-class people off of health care some [4:31] 50 000 people a year will die tell me why you think it's a good idea to give tax breaks to billionaires [4:40] and allow 50 000 low-income and working-class people to die unnecessarily uh senator first of all [4:46] that's overstated by 5.1 million that that is not attributed to this bill uh is simply it's a [4:53] combination that's true you all had a scheduled expiration of obamacare subsidies and you did [5:00] not extend that when you were in charge 5.1 million 1.4 million illegal aliens on medicaid all right [5:08] and there are work requirements and our goal is to get more money to children do you know others really [5:17] your goal is to get more money to children yeah and working people really come on uh do you know how many [5:24] people and i was surprised to hear this i don't know if you know it or not how many people lose their [5:28] jobs every year quit get fired or whatever you have any idea well there's there's something called [5:33] the quits rate and so when when the job market is strong more people quit but yeah i was surprised [5:39] that i just researched this i don't know you happen to know i i don't know the number i was surprised [5:44] would it be shocking to you it was to me 20 million people leave their jobs a year doesn't shock you [5:49] right that's a big labor force right so somebody leaves the job maybe they move maybe something [5:55] happens in their lives right we have a lot of transition in the labor market correct maybe [5:59] they get a better job right exactly maybe they do or maybe they have to stay home their wife gets sick [6:05] whatever we don't know but 20 million people lose their jobs in the given year leave their jobs in [6:11] a given year are those people lazy sanders's attack lands because he isn't arguing over abstract ideology [6:19] he narrows the fight to one provision the estate tax in the hearing he calls it a 235 billion dollar [6:27] tax break for a tiny sliver at the top outside analysts using the house passed bill put that [6:34] estate tax expansion in roughly the same ballpark estimating about 211 billion to 212 billion dollars [6:41] through 2034. the center on budget and policy priorities says the bill would let a wealthy couple [6:47] pass 30 million dollars tax free to heirs and notes only about one in one thousand estates are rich [6:54] enough to owe estate tax at all in other words sanders's real argument is that this is not about [7:00] neighborhood small businesses it is about inherited wealth at the very top what happens when i leave [7:06] my job and maybe i have to move to another state to take care of my ill mother and i desperately need [7:12] medicaid am i too lazy now to be able to get medicaid i think that's a mischaracterization of the work [7:17] requirement really well i'm not quite so sure uh it is um i don't okay well thank you very much mr [7:27] chairman i want to ask about the republican big beautiful bill which will knock about 16 million [7:33] people off their health care coverage and cut programs that keep groceries cheaper for millions of [7:40] families in order to try to pay for about four trillion dollars in tax giveaways that are mostly going [7:46] to be sucked up by millionaires billionaires and wealthy corporations so mr bassin uh secretary [7:53] bassin i'd like to start with a very simple question will this bill increase or decrease the deficit [8:04] they're varying uh scoring on that you're the secretary of the treasury so i'm asking you [8:11] what is your view will this bill increase or decrease the deficit it is my view that over the 10-year [8:18] window it will decrease you know do you have anybody who agrees with you on yes yes ma'am let me ask my [8:27] question okay every credible independent expert agrees that trump and the republicans big beautiful bill [8:37] would add trillions of dollars to the national debt and would not even come close to paying for itself [8:43] the non-partisan congressional budget office the pen wharton budget model and the yale budget lab [8:51] all agree on this and they're looking at 10-year windows thank you so do the conservative tax foundation [8:57] and committee for responsible federal budget conservative groups even elon musk and the wall street journal [9:05] are criticizing the bill for ballooning the national debt the only people who are saying publicly [9:13] that it's not going to add to the national debt are you donald trump the republicans in congress [9:21] do you have an independent group that has put forward numbers that disagrees with all of these [9:27] conservative groups and disagrees with the wall street journal on this well senator and interesting to [9:32] see you aligned with elon musk uh but um if i you're no more shocked than i am [9:45] if we want to take the full congressional congressional budget scoring they predict and i i don't agree [9:52] with their methodology they predict a 2.4 trillion deficit but okay so the answer to the question is yes [9:59] no no but may i finish they include that but they've also scored 2.8 trillion in tariff income [10:06] so even even in washington dc math in washington dc math that is a 400 billion surplus okay so let me [10:13] make sure i understand this bill you admit will increase the deficit by 2.4 trillion dollars but you [10:21] think there will be another bill in another set of agreements that somehow materialize haven't materialized [10:28] so far don't have any statutory authority but that will make up the difference so the answer to the [10:34] original question will this bill increase or decrease the deficit i think you just said it will [10:40] increase this bill increases the no i want to use all the all the cbo scoring and you can't take one [10:48] without the other i don't agree with the cbo one is the law that we are scoring the bill that is in front of [10:55] us we don't have a tariff bill in front of us to score mr secretary let me go on to the second [11:00] question you have said that government spending is quote out of control you have also called government [11:07] spending quote unsustainable in fact in the name of physical responsibility you're working with the [11:13] republicans on this big beautiful bill to pass the biggest cuts to medicaid and the affordable care [11:19] act in american history so mr secretary help me understand here why is the national debt so very [11:27] important that you're trying to kick 16 million people off their health insurance but increasing [11:34] the national debt doesn't seem to matter if you're cutting taxes for billionaires and billionaire [11:40] corporations well first of all a huge portion of this goes to family-owned businesses that are [11:48] pass-through entities that are below that level senator and i am sure you share my goals of main [11:55] street prosperity you know i'm glad to do tax cuts for people of modest means the question i'm asking [12:01] is why does the deficit not matter to you we're talking about knocking 16 million people off their [12:07] health care but it matters not it does matter to you if we're knocking people off their health care but [12:13] not well first of all that figure is overstated by 5.1 million that is amount not attributed [12:18] to provisions in this bill it is simply well first of all let's set that straight work requirements [12:28] account for eight million of cbo's claim number again we're creating an economy that promotes [12:34] and reward so you don't want to answer the question senator i am answering no you're not and what i want [12:41] is for medicaid to be used the for mothers and children as it was meant not for 1.4 million illegal [12:47] aliens not for able-bodied people medicaid is not used for people who are not documented mr chairman i [12:54] just want to say here the part that troubles me the most is that the secretary is deeply worried about [13:01] the uh about the deficit and is willing to knock 16 million or he says merely 11 million people off their [13:09] health care matters so much but it doesn't matter so much if you're cutting taxes for billionaires [13:15] then it's okay to run up a big deficit i think that's wrong in the end this hearing was not [13:19] memorable because bernie sanders yelled the loudest or because elizabeth warren asked the sharpest question [13:26] it matters because it captured in a few brutal minutes the real fight over trump era economics in plain [13:31] english sanders asked why working families should lose health security while ultra wealthy heirs get another [13:37] tax break warren asked why debt suddenly stops mattering when the beneficiaries are billionaires [13:43] and giant corporations besant offered the administration's answer growth wages manufacturing [13:50] and a stronger economy but the reason this footage keeps circulating is that the simplest questions [13:56] were also the hardest ones to answer cleanly who pays who benefits and when the numbers are stripped [14:03] away whose side is this bill actually on

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →