Audience ERUPTS IN APPLAUSE As JD Vance SHUTS DOWN Bill Maher Trump Derangement Over And Over Again

[0:00] Baptist this is about your your spiritual journey that's right which is really interesting and by [0:04] the way well very very personal yeah it reminded me a little of Gavin Newsom he has a book here [0:10] and I was very surprised it didn't look like his book had you read his book people bought my book [0:14] that's the difference what's that mean I'm just saying that's fine boy boy boy boy boy so we got [0:26] to talk about vice president JD Vance once again demonstrating to the world that he is the best [0:31] communicator amongst all of the potential candidates that could run for president in [0:37] 2028 I'm talking about Democrat Republican especially Republican right because he's going to be running [0:42] in a Republican primary again if he runs right we don't know I mean we speculate that you know JD [0:47] is going to run right he's going to be a top contender he's an amazing communicator and he's [0:54] showing once again that that is his his main strength here as he went on Bill Maher's show [0:59] and uh got a lot of applause right got a lot of applause as Bill Maher tried to hit him with [1:04] the liberal talking points uh but I think that JD does a good job of leaving a good impression on [1:10] anybody that he sits down in an interview with uh we already talked about how he did that on a view [1:15] with Joy Behar right Joy Behar basically told JD hey I think you should run for president right after [1:21] sitting down and talking with him right it's almost as if JD is not the flaming racist hateful bigot [1:28] neo-nazi that the mainstream liberal media makes him out to be right uh that is not who JD is uh [1:36] he's a very likable guy uh and again you're gonna see once again when he sits down with liberals and [1:41] he talks to him like clearly um there's a lot of common ground right that can be met uh because [1:47] again I think JD is very good at articulating common sense right which is an underrated skill set [1:53] in politics to be honest with you so while further ado let's get into a few clips here of uh JD doing [1:59] a great job on Bill Maher's show uh Bill Maher is going to confront him about the ice raids and I [2:04] think that JD um does a great job of laying out the reality of what happens when you're actually [2:09] trying to enforce the law in this country that is not going to be pretty you guys went too far [2:15] you went too far and you should own it like you did childless cat ladies okay so here here's the [2:28] basic problem with that Bill is you cannot do any deportations without law enforcement and you can't [2:35] do a law enforcement operation like that without having some situations that don't look good when [2:41] they're when they're recorded like that I mean let me give you like just one obvious example let's just [2:46] set aside the the immigration element of this okay if you take a guy who's committed murder and you go [2:53] and arrest that guy sometimes that person's going to resist arrest sometimes if you take a video of [2:58] it and it's out of context and you don't appreciate why that person is being arrested in the first place [3:02] it looks pretty icky if you take that out of context video clip and what I worry about is when people say [3:08] you can't ever do immigration enforcement if it produces a bad video clip what they're really saying is [3:14] you can't ever actually do immigration enforcement we had 12 million people come into the country into [3:19] the interior over the last four years or I should say from 2021 to 2025 and we were elected with a [3:26] mandate to get some of those people out of the United States of America you can't do that easily [3:31] law enforcement deporting people is never an easy process so I appreciate your argument that we've gone [3:37] too far but we couldn't do nothing and I don't think there was an easy way to do this [3:41] yeah yeah so JD is simply laying out the reality of what happens when you're actually trying to [3:49] enforce the law right statistically speaking when you have these interactions that are by definition [3:55] going to be confrontational right they're going to be somewhat violent because again you're talking [4:01] about physically removing people from the country right just like you talk about regular law enforcement [4:07] interactions where you have police interacting with potential criminals or whatever yeah [4:11] statistically speaking again when you're having millions of these types of interactions you're [4:15] going to get gray area type interactions right a vast majority of time you know justified but you're [4:20] going to have gray area stuff that's going to make people feel uncomfortable but the fact that we [4:25] have that is actually a sign that the system is working right not a sign that you have to demolish the [4:31] system or that the system is not working right it's actually a sign that the administration [4:34] is actually trying to do their job right we have liberals out here uh winning darn awards industries [4:42] rioting protesting uh that's a great sign right that's a sign that they're actually really trying [4:46] to execute on the mass deportations right despite the fact that democrats have went out of their way [4:51] to obstruct the administration from doing so with their sanctuary city policies um the outrage um is [4:58] evidence that the administration is doing what they're supposed to be doing right same thing with law [5:05] enforcement um if you did not have um incidences of police brutality i mean police brutality in [5:11] the sense that you have police who you know rough up people who are again committing crimes right who [5:16] are resisting arrest um if you didn't have that then that would actually be a bad sign because that [5:21] would mean that they're not really enforcing the law right the nature of law enforcement in and of [5:26] itself police interacting with criminals right you're going to produce uh gray area interactions that are [5:33] not going to look good or they're not going to feel good to look at um out of context but that's just [5:39] the reality of how law enforcement has to work if you did not have any of these type of interactions [5:44] uh occur then that means that there's no law enforcement right again the difference here is that [5:51] people with common sense understand that yeah this is just a consequence of trying to enforce the law [5:56] and it doesn't mean that i should be abolished or that police should be abolished it just means that this is [6:02] what happens right and yes we should try to prevent these interactions okay with you know common sense [6:09] uh reforms and rules and things of that nature but they're gonna happen and every single time they [6:14] happen it doesn't mean that there's some type of crisis right or that again ice or police should be [6:19] abolished right that is the difference between somebody with common sense and leftist democrat party [6:25] thinking right on this issue especially when you talk about ice again in law enforcement [6:30] i just there's a middle ground see the other thing that bothers us about stuff like that [6:35] is that nothing ever lands in the middle which is what i'm always trying to get people to do [6:39] i thought you were crazy liberal you should don't watch the show you should watch the show i actually [6:45] do watch the show i laughed my ass off backstage that was a good monologue even though you're making [6:49] fun of me i kind of liked it yeah it was fair yeah i know someone in your administration who watches [6:59] the show yo how can you dislike jd right i really don't understand these people who don't like jd well [7:07] i do understand people in the left who don't like jd but i don't understand people on the right who [7:11] don't like jd right i understand people saying hey you know uh maybe you know i like desantis or [7:16] rubio better for x y z reasons but i really don't understand people who like have a strong dislike for [7:22] jd uh i think he's a very likable guy to be honest with you um i have no issues with [7:27] jd to be honest with you um and again i just get the feeling that he's just a guy that is very [7:34] likable once you actually meet him in person and you talk to him and you sit down and have a real [7:38] conversation he's like oh yeah this dude is like a he's a regular guy just like everybody else i think [7:43] that even liberals like bill bar are getting that impression this mou is fundamentally it says the [7:49] straits are going to be open the oil is going to flow we're seeing that happen already it's also a [7:54] ceasefire which as you pointed out is always going to be a little messy when you're dealing with the [7:57] iranians but if we make the final deal then great if we don't make the final deal their nuclear program [8:04] is still destroyed they're still much weaker as a country so my attitude is america wins either way [8:09] but i do think that what the president has done is asked us to do something that frankly [8:13] nobody in 47 years of dealing with the iranians has done which is offer them an opportunity to [8:18] fundamentally transform how they behave with the west they've been the largest state sponsor of [8:22] terrorism basically since they they began as a nation or at least as an islamic republic 47 years [8:28] ago he's saying look if they're willing to change we're willing to change too if they're not willing [8:34] to change we still fundamentally have all the cards and i think it's a good place for us to be but their [8:38] program isn't destroyed the nuclear program isn't destroyed i mean i don't know i don't know any of [8:43] our objectives and look i said what part is not destroyed well we didn't get in there the whole thing [8:49] is we have to get in there and see are there else we wouldn't be doing this well let me say we didn't [8:53] first of all so a nuclear program and i'm hardly a nuclear scientist i'm a lowly politician but the [9:00] thing that you have to destroy is their ability to enrich uranium which has been destroyed you have [9:04] to destroy their ability well because you need functioning centrifuges that can actually spend we [9:11] know we got to get in there and we got to get the dust okay and we didn't get in there so how do we [9:14] get the dust so that's actually a separate question so there's the highly enriched stockpile which by the [9:19] way was allowed to accumulate over 20 years of previous administrations that enriched stockpile is [9:24] something that we want to get but bill if we never get it and the president wants it and we are going [9:29] to get it but if we never got it it's buried deep underground and they don't have the ability to turn [9:34] into a nuclear weapon so the program is functionally destroyed we're just talking about can we set them [9:39] back even further through these negotiations yeah so once again jd articulating um where we're at right [9:48] now when it comes to the iran situation obviously there's going to be volatility right which is [9:53] something i said uh when they first signed this deal that's not really a deal right it's a deal to [9:58] eventually have some final deal uh there's gonna be volatility and you know people tend to make a big [10:04] deal about you know iran doing a strike or the united states doing a strike it's like bro this is just [10:09] kind of how it works right this is what happens when you're dealing with you know two countries who [10:13] essentially are at war and we're trying to come to some type of peace agreement it's not it's not [10:18] pretty right it's not gonna be smooth the whole time right there's gonna be some volatility and i [10:23] think jd is doing a great job of explaining that that's normal uh but the final result is to be [10:31] determined right and this is what we're trying to do we're trying to give diplomacy a chance um and [10:37] we're not gonna know whether or not this is gonna be successful until we ultimately make a deal [10:43] uh but even we don't make a deal uh we still have leverage right we still have the cards uh and [10:48] that is what jd laid out the media has tried to divide this administration on iran like for example [10:53] they tried to confront marco rubio because everybody assumed that just because marco rubio wasn't [10:58] out here trying to i don't know outdo jd uh talking about this deal that somehow there's some [11:06] conflict or some divide within the administration or divide between jd and marco uh on this issue and [11:12] that's not the case right i think that uh everybody's on the same team as the president [11:17] right everybody's on the same page as the president when it comes to what we're trying to accomplish [11:22] with this iran situation as the country's top diplomat do you not want more of a direct role [11:27] in these talks which have been until now really led by the vice president and well we have a little bit i [11:33] think like any uh i i think that's just a silly analysis so the vice president is the second ranking [11:37] person in our government it just shows you how seriously we take that endeavor and we have a team of [11:42] people that do work i mean i'm here today because they were overseas last week we all have a role to [11:46] play in this regard so i mean i'm here i've been here for three days this is a key component of that [11:50] so but but that i think that's a really silly question the vice president united states other [11:55] than the president is the second most powerful person in our government the fact that he's directly [11:58] involved in this tells you the importance that our administration has given to this topic so i think [12:03] it's a very positive thing that he's involved in it fidelity about this about this let's just put a fine [12:08] point on this question how wide is the divide between you and the vice president on what issue [12:13] on any issue this administration let me tell you something everyone here is a line behind the [12:17] president of the united states every single one of us the president of the united states makes the [12:21] foreign policy of our country and our job we obviously give advice we give counsel we give opinions [12:25] but when the president of the united states is the one who is elected by the people of our country [12:29] to conduct our foreign policy the president makes these decisions and all of us on his team [12:34] every single one of us works in lockstep very closely with one another to execute on the [12:38] president's foreign policy everything we do is because the president's made a decision that it's [12:42] going to be done and one of the things i'm very proud of i can't speak for every element of our [12:47] government because i'm not involved in other aspects of our government but one of the things [12:50] that i'm the proudest of is that when it comes to foreign policy and national security we have no drama [12:55] we have no games we have a group of people that work very well together and closely to execute on the [13:01] president's directives which is why i think we've had good outcomes and good achievements and we're [13:05] going to continue to have good outcomes and good achievements everyone has an important role to [13:08] play and everyone is playing that role and doing it in a collaborative process and i think that [13:13] serves the president well and i think that serves the country well of course trump can't run again [13:20] and he'd be a little too exciting for me anyway so it's either going to be you or rubia here's my deal [13:28] breaker for your side okay okay under trump you guys have two outcomes an election can be either [13:34] we win or they cheated that shit has to stop well i mean that's your deal breaker uh bill maher then [13:41] i don't know why you vote democrat because democrats have basically uh contested every election that [13:47] they lost since bush right um so you know i i don't understand why bill maher is so obsessed with [13:53] this whole you know challenging the election thing um both sides um you know tend to have issues [13:59] when they lose it is what is the difference is that uh i am not uh the type of person that is going [14:05] to say that you you can't do that right or that you're a threat to democracy or that you're an [14:08] insurrectionist or that you're a bad person for having questions about um the outcome of an election [14:14] um democrats on the other hand uh they will um disagree with the outcome of election they will claim [14:20] an election is stolen but then turn around and uh get mad at other people for doing the same thing [14:24] right that that's the main issue so again if that's your thing bill maher then uh again i'm not [14:30] entirely sure why is it that you vote democrat why do you support democrats but really to be honest with [14:35] you after trump is done like i just don't see future republicans going down that route right like [14:41] i just don't see it really being an issue uh after trump is done right when it comes to you know [14:46] making a big deal about you know losing the election or whatever and the person remember [14:58] these are the same people who claimed that trump was illegitimately elected in 2016 right they rotted [15:02] in the streets uh they had their own little insurrection uh on inauguration day uh after [15:07] president trump got into office they never accepted trump as a legitimate president so again i i just feel [15:12] like this talking point from the left is just so silly to me and that means the person who has to [15:20] stop it would be you or marco can you tell me you will do that will you bring us back to the middle [15:29] at least on that where we concede elections where it's not either one of those two options okay bill [15:35] so this is where i'm probably going to lose you here but here here's that happened about eight minutes [15:39] ago look i i i i don't think that we should not concede elections but i don't think that's what's [15:52] going on i think that if you go back if you go back to the president's core argument he was making [15:58] an argument about problems that existed in 2020 and here's the problem that i'm most focused on the [16:03] president i've talked a lot about this and i think we we we share a perspective here but set to the [16:09] side the stuff that really gets you and your audience very angry about whether the count was [16:14] legitimate in georgia or pennsylvania or any of these other states is it true that large technology [16:20] companies some of whom have financial interests that exist outside the united states of america [16:25] were they censoring information in the run-up to an election and set to the side the stuff again [16:31] the georgia stuff but it is that was litigated dominion the fox news paid us i'm actually i'm [16:39] trying to make the more the more middle ground argument here the biggest criticism i had at the [16:44] 2020 election is that you had technology companies that were quite literally censoring negative [16:50] information about the left and promoting negative information about the right so in a fundamental [16:56] sense like if if the first amendment says that we have a free and open debate and then the american [17:00] people judge based on that free and open debate the sense in which i think the election in 2020 was [17:06] rigged i'm sorry is that you had technology companies that were putting their thumb on the scale in a [17:11] way that completely obliterated the real open exchange of ideas now by the way it didn't happen in 2024 [17:17] but it happened in 2020 and it was a problem well you're gonna get a big pat on the back when you [17:22] go back to the white house yeah so yeah i mean throw the media in there as well too right censoring [17:28] the hunter biden laptop story which was 100 legitimate right i think we all remember that yeah i think that [17:34] the media goes out of their way generally speaking uh to try to rig our elections but um yeah i think [17:40] that jd here uh does a really good job of reaching across the aisle right and trying to find a middle [17:46] ground while at the same time uh not you know conceding too much and uh he just sounds very [17:52] reasonable like i said i think jd is the best communicator um in the republican party at this [17:57] point and i think that's his strong suit and that's what we continue to see over and over and over again [18:01] as jd goes into hostile territory the view bill maher whatever right jd is killing it and i love to see [18:10] it because that is what it's going to take to win a general election right if you're going to win a general [18:14] election you have to be able to talk to the other side right you're going to have to be able to [18:18] convince the other side of your ideas that your ideas are good uh and to agree with you and that's [18:25] going to be especially important if the democrats are going to run a socialist right if they're going [18:29] to run a full-blown communist which it looks like that's what they're going to do right that's what [18:33] they're going to run on then you know this right here this type of hey you know i can speak to the [18:37] middle ground uh is going to be a very very very significant advantage for somebody like jd uh if he is [18:44] the republican nominee right as i've outlined before i think that jd is the best when it comes [18:48] to communication um he is getting uh some of that executive experience being uh vice president and [18:54] um how this iran deal goes uh is going to determine whether or not uh he's going to get some brownie [19:00] points for that as well too if this iran deal is successful i think that skyrockets him to the [19:05] number one spot right uh but right now um as it stands i think that desantis is the best when it [19:13] comes to execution right being an executive like proving that he can actually run and govern a state [19:19] okay i think desantis is who i would prefer again if i'm just looking for just flat out execution right [19:24] who can get stuff done right who can execute on the agenda i think that desantis is probably number [19:29] one when it comes to that and i think that marco rubio is the best of both worlds right i think he's [19:33] the best of jd and the best of ron desantis uh again it's going to be fascinating to see uh how all [19:39] this shapes out going into 2028 regardless um i think that jd uh his stock is rising right the more [19:45] interviews uh that he participates in especially in hostile territory like the view like bill maher [19:52] uh i think that that helps him when it comes to trying to get those middle ground voters right [19:58] that's very very very important especially considering how democrats are running away from [20:03] that right running away from the middle ground with again radical socialists okay and even people [20:08] like bill maher are not necessarily on board with the far left agenda at least this is what he claims [20:13] like if this is where the democratic party is going where this democratic socialist this obsession [20:19] with israel with the jew hating with they don't believe in capitalism no prisons if this is where [20:24] they're going my vote is in play okay and i like to hear that it actually always has been i just [20:31] every year i don't make my decision by who was an r or d i actually always came to the conclusion [20:36] that the democrat was by probably better sure and voted for them okay and trump can't run again [20:42] and he'd be a little too exciting for me anyway so it's either going to be you or rubia right and [20:50] he claims his biggest problem with the republican party is trump we're going to see right we're going [20:54] to see uh if these people these center left people right these people who claim that they're liberal [21:00] we're going to see how they really feel right we're going to see who they vote for who they support [21:04] in 2028 because again if it's jd versus some aoc person or some aoc clone then these liberals don't [21:11] have any excuse not to vote for jd right because trump ain't on the ballot right and at that point [21:17] trump will be done um so again they're not gonna have an excuse they can't just stand behind well [21:22] see i just don't like trump trump is just so bad he's so terrible you can't make that same argument [21:26] against jd and against marco rubio and desantis you just can't do it so we're gonna see but let me know [21:33] what you got steak make sure you like comment and subscribe most importantly share a black [21:36] conservative perspective peace