Okay, so I already did the preliminaries about the cell phones and the microphones while you were out. We usually begin with a reading of the statement of purpose of the board, and I'm going to ask our new member, Mr. Alexander, to read it. And make sure your green light is on. I think the green light is on. And statement of purpose. Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board. The code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the city of Dunedin has occurred. In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation. All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth. The city, through its staff, will present its evidence of the alleged violation after the city has completed its presentation, the respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence. Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board. The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present brief opening and closing statements, if so desired. The board will then openly deliberate, considering only the evidence presented, the law, and common knowledge. By motion, duly made and seconded, discussed, and approved by at least four members of the board, an order will be issued. The order will contain, one, findings of fact, two, conclusions of law, three, affirmative action to be taken. The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail. Thank you. Before we begin with the items that are on the formal agenda, there is an opportunity for people to speak to items that are not on the agenda. Is there anyone here in the room that wants to speak about an item that's not on the agenda? No? Okay. All right. The first item on the agenda then is the consent agenda. We have approval of the minutes of our meeting last month on May 6th. Has everyone on the board had an opportunity to review them? I have one question. I did not. Lisa, please. Lisa, say your name, please. Lisa Hunt. Did we change new business 5A from case 24-1167 to 25-1167? Is that on page three? Right here. Is that the one that was incorrect on the agenda? Yes. Okay. In the minutes, it says 25. Okay, good. Right. Thank you. Sure thing. Jamie Ballard, I move to accept the minutes. Second, please. Walensky, accept. Do we need a roll call, John? No. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Thank you. Okay. We have on today's agenda, before we begin, people who are going to be testifying, please stand. John will swear you in. Okay. Item 3A is case number 19-367, the city versus Ioanna Kappas. We have an affidavit of compliance for a case that's five years old. We do. Good afternoon, board. Julie Phillips, co-compliance supervisor, and I am requesting you accept the affidavit of compliance for case 19-367. I did review the case, and unfortunately, there was a lack of communication between the homeowner and the inspector who is no longer with us, and after inspection and reviewing, the property owner was in compliance, and I do have evidence of that, so I'm requesting that you accept the affidavit of compliance. Any questions by the board? The compliance date was what date? The compliance date was May 8, 2019. So is this an administrative housekeeping type matter? It is. Okay. Any other questions? No. Jamie Ballard, I move in case 19-367 for the property located at 180 Milwaukee Avenue to find the respondent, Iona Kappas, in compliance for correcting the violations and to accept the affidavit of compliance. Second. Second. Thank you. Joan. Mr. Gillette. Aye. Mr. Walensky. Aye. Ms. Hunt. Aye. Ms. Ballard. Aye. Mr. Reynolds. Oh, Mr. Reynolds. Not here. Sorry. Mr. Alexander. Aye. Chair Stone. Aye. The motion passes. Okay. New business. Case number 25-1184, the City of Dunedin versus 2235 Harborview Trust, Laura Lyons, trustee, and John Kunin, trustee, for the property located at 2235 Harborview Drive. Who is going to be speaking? I am. Okay. Come forward, please. Are we ready? I think we are. Is there anyone here, a respondent? Nobody is here, no. Okay. That gentleman is not, is just observing. Okay. Well, why don't you get started then? Okay. Good afternoon, board. My name is Rachel Laurel, co-compliance inspector for the City of Dunedin. Time out. I don't believe any of our monitors are on. Joan? Pardon me? Our monitors are all dark. When you bring yours up, those should come up. It says there's no HDMI signal. Yeah. I'm afraid you're going to have to take a look at these. Sorry. Really? Yeah. We'll work off of the two large monitors on the wall. It's okay. Okay. This is property address 2235 Harborview Drive, case number 25-1184. The respondent is 2235 Harborview Drive, trust, Laura Lyons, trust, and John N. Coonan, trustee. I guess they're trustees. The address is 2235 Harborview Drive. The zoning is single-family home in the R60 zoning district. Number of violations are four. International Property Maintenance Code, Section 304.1 General. The exterior of a structure shall be maintained in good repair, structurally sound, and sanitary so as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare. IPMC Section 304.1.1 Unsafe conditions, roofing or roofing components that have defects that admit rain, roof surfaces with inadequate drainage, or any portion of the roof framing that is not in good repair, with signs of deterioration, fatigued, or without proper anchorage, and incapable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects. Number three, IPMC Section 304.6, exterior walls. All exterior walls shall be free from holes, breaks, or loose or rotting materials, and maintain weatherproof and properly surface-coated where required to prevent deterioration. Number four, IPMC Section 304.13, window, skylights, and door frames. Every window, skylight, door, and frame shall be kept in sound condition, good repair, and weather type. A notice of violation was posted to the property, City Hall, and sent certified mail to the owner on 3-27-2025 with the compliance date of April 27, 20-25. Certified mail for the notice of violation was returned to the office on April 25, 2025 at 2-50 p.m. A notice of hearing was posted to the property, City Hall, and sent certified mail to the owner on May 21, 20-25, and as of this morning, I have not received the delivery mail confirmation notice yet for the notice of hearing. Here is a photo of the front of the property taken on March 20, 2025. I was called out here by the building inspector for an unsecured swimming pool. This property backs to the canal, and during the hurricanes, the panels of the fence were blown out, so that was another case that I was handling, and they're in compliance for the unsecured swimming pool, but I noticed the condition of the property having some damage. Boarded window, this is a bedroom window that there's a broken pane of glass. The fascia, the soffits are hanging or missing. Here is the side of the property taken on March 20, 2025, showing that the exterior walls, the siding is loose. It's hard to see, but you can see the soffit also on the side of the property is pushed in, and the front of the property, you can see where the soffit is hanging or missing. March 27, 2025, you can see there is no change to the property. On March 20, I did meet with the resident, Tyson, who told me that his mother is aware of the condition of the property, and she's making repairs. On this day, March 27, this is the day that I posted the notice of violation for both the unsecured pool as well as the building. I did speak. Tyson gave me the telephone number for his mother. Her name is Anita, and we spoke about the condition of the property. She told me that they own several commercial businesses, and they have contractors as their tenants, so it wouldn't be an issue making the repairs. We discussed the compliance date of April 27, 2025. I gave it 30 days to comply. Told her that there would be no permit if they make the repairs to the soffit fascia, the siding, and the window, as long as they're replacing just the glass. If they were to touch the frame, then they would need to obtain a building permit to replace the entire window. And this is the day, March 27, 2025, of the posting of the notice of notice of hearing. Here is the north side of the property, showing the soffit is missing. And in the front, you can see it's hanging. Here on March 27, 2025, is an affidavit of posting and notice of violation posted to the front door. Here's a close-up picture of that affidavit of posting notice of violation. On April 29, this was after the compliance date for the notice of violation. There has been no change to the property. The violations still remain. Here's a picture of the front of the property on re-inspection date. Still no change to the property, as well as the side, the north side of the property. No change on re-inspection date. May 21, 2025, there's been still no change to the property. This is the day of the posting of the notice of hearing. Here's the front of the house. Also on May 21, 2025, here is on May 21, 2025, affidavit of posting and notice of today's hearing posted to the front door. And here's a close-up picture. A re-inspection was done yesterday and you can see there has still been no change to the exterior of the property. Here's a close-up picture of the side of the house. The siding is still hanging, loose and hanging. Here's the front still with the broken window, soffit, fascia, and disrepair. And here's the north side with the soffit. And now I'll leave it up to the board to deliberate. Question. Before we open it up to questions from board members, have you been in communication with the property owners or the respondents? I've been in communication with Anita, who is apparently Tyson, who's the resident. She is not shown on the property appraiser as the owner. I believe she is the wife of John Cunin, one of the property owners, according to Tyson. And I've tried reaching out to her on April 30th. I left the voicemail for her. And on May 8th, I left another voicemail to her. And she's never called me back to discuss the violations in her attempts. So there's been no other communication from anybody there. Are they renting? I'm sorry? The people that are in there, are they renting from this Harborview Trust? I was told that he is the son of the owner. But he's not the owner? He's not the owner, no. So we don't know if they're renting from the owner? No. Okay. Matt, going forward, just identify yourself before you ask a question so the transcriber knows who's speaking, please. Other board members with questions? I just, it appeared that in some of those... Jamie. Oh, Jamie Ballard, sorry. It appeared... You just mentioned that, didn't you? It appeared that there was some work that was being done out there. There was a portalette and some construction stuff. And noticeably, they were maybe trying to do some cosmetic items. That is for the neighbor next door. That's what brought the building inspector to that location, was doing a building inspection on the property next door. And then she saw the condition of this home and the unsecured swimming pool. So she called me to ask me to go there and address the swimming pool. So yeah, all of that is for the neighbor, not for this property. Thank you. Other board members with questions? Lisa Hunt. And you did say the pool is now secure though, right? The pool is secure. Okay. They did it within the timeframe. Okay. That came first. Making sure. Okay. Chris Alexander, what makes it unsecured? There was, all the panels blew off. Of the pool? So it was open and exposed to minor children. Oh, security. It was a safety. Got you. Okay. Yeah. They replaced the panels. So now the pool is totally enclosed. Okay. Does the city have a recommendation? City's recommendation for case number 25-1184 were four violations of IPMC section 304.1 general, IPMC section 304.1.1 parent eight, unsafe conditions, IPMC section 304.6 exterior walls, and IPMC section 304.1.3 window skylights and door frames requesting compliance on or before July 3rd, 2025, which is 30 days from today's board hearing, for the owner or contractor to repair or replace areas and disrepair if replacing entire window to obtain a building permit prior to the replacement. Or, given the severity of the violation is minor, I am requesting a fine in the amount of $150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Per violation. Per violation. Well, Linsky, so you've extended the date? Wait, Matt, your name. Well, Linsky. So you're extending the date for the repairs? Yes. For additional 30 days to July 3rd. Lisa Hunt. Any other questions? Lisa Hunt. Are you going to take off the pool violation? The pool violation is already in compliance. That's not part of this case. Okay, so it's not. That's what brought me to this property. Okay, I just wanted to make sure that, okay, I understood that. Yeah, that was case number 25-1185. Gotcha. So there were two at this location. Thank you. Okay. Any other questions from members of the board or council? I'll entertain a motion. Jamie Ballard. I move in case number 25-1184 for the property located at 2235 Harborview Drive in violation of the City of Dunedin Code section's IPMC section 304.1 general, 304.1.1 per N8 unsafe conditions, 304.6 exterior walls, and 304.13 window, skylight, and door frames. I order the respondent 2235 Harborview Trust, Laura Lyons, trustee, and John N. Koonin, trustee, to come into compliance before July 3rd, 2025. If not in compliance, a fine of $150 per violation per day will be imposed until compliance is met. The respondent is hereby ordered to contact the Code Compliance Office for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Do I have a second? Lisa Hunt, second. Thank you, Lisa. Okay, Mr. Gillette? Aye. Mr. Walensky? Nay. Ms. Hunt? Aye. Ms. Ballard? Aye. Mr. Alexander? Aye. Chair Stone? Aye. And the motion passes, and order will issue. Okay, the next, the gentleman who came in after the meeting started, are you here for a case on the agenda? You. Yeah. You're, okay, thank you. So the next case involves the same respondent? Different respondent. Well, the next two cases involve the same respondent. Yes. Judith Lane, okay. All right, so are we going to call them separately, or how do you want to proceed? Separately. Separately, okay. Yes. So the case we're going to hear now is agenda item 5B, case number 25-1288, City of Dunedin versus Judith C. Lane, concerning the property located at 2016 Woodward Avenue in Dunedin. Who is presenting? I am. Okay. Go to it. Okay. Good afternoon, board members. My name is Rachel Laurel, co-compliance inspector for the City of Dunedin. I'm showing you a PowerPoint presentation for the property located at 2016 Woodward Avenue, case number 25-1288. I am requesting a declaration of violation. The respondent is Judith C. Lane. She resides at 2016 Woodward Avenue. Zoning is single-family home in the R-60 zoning district. Number of violations is 1 of DCO Section 105-27.1.1.1.1, paren F, 1 and 5. Site standards for housing in duplexes, utility trailers, boats, recreational vehicles, and other recreational equipment standards. Number one, utility trailers, boats, recreational equipment, and recreational vehicles may not be parked or stored in any portion of the front yard to include the buildable area unless actual loading or unloading with the four-hour maximum is taken place. Number five, no utility trailers, boats, or other recreational equipment and recreational vehicles shall be located within the minimum setbacks established in Chapter 103 zoning unless screened by a six-foot privacy fence. A notice of violation was posted to the property, City Hall, and sent certified mail to the owner on April 30, 2025 on April 30, 2025 with a compliance date of May 9, 2025. The certified mail for the notice of violation was signed for by the owner on May 2, 2025 at 10.23 a.m. Notice of hearing was posted to the property, City Hall, and sent certified mail to the owner on May 21, 2025. And that certified mail for the notice of hearing was signed for by the owner on May 24, 2025 at 2.22 p.m. This location had double jet skis that were parked and stored on the driveway. This property owner is chronic for this in the past. They frequently bring in the jet skis back to the property. This was on April 22, 2025. I went up to the front door. I left a door hanger on this day. A re-inspection on April 30, 2025 showed the jet skis were moved to the side of the driveway, but still not behind a six-foot privacy fence. That was the day of my posting, of my affidavit of posting and notice of violation on April 30, 20, 2025. A re-inspection was done on May 14, 2025 to show the jet skis were back on the driveway. A re-inspection was done May 20, 2025, and the double jet skis are now in the front yard. And on my posting of my notice of hearing, the jet skis were removed, which is why I'm requesting a declaration of violation. This was on May 21, 2025. Here is a picture of the affidavit of posting and notice of hearing posted to the front door. Here is a close-up of the affidavit of posting and notice of today's hearing on May 21, 2025. And now I'll leave it up to the board to deliberate. So tell us again what action you're requesting. Just a declaration of violation? Yes, just a declaration of violation. Did I hear you correctly that there have been previous reports concerning this property? Yes. So is this a repeat violation or are those different code sections? It was never brought before the code board. Okay. But he's been in violation. He frequently brings the jet skis back. Okay. All right. Would someone like to make a motion? Do anyone on the board have questions? Lisa Hunt, I have a question. How long can he leave it parked in the driveway like if he's, it's Friday and he brings it and he goes jet skiing Saturday? I mean, what are? Four hours loading and unloading. Four hours loading and unloading? And he has to put it behind the fence. Okay. Or remove it from the property because he doesn't have room. He doesn't need the setbacks on the side. Okay. So now it's apparently at a friend's house. So. So he is currently in compliance? He's in compliance. So it went by yesterday also. The jet skis are not on the property. Okay. So on case 25-1288, would someone care to make a motion? Walensky, I move in case 25-1288 for the property located at 2016 Woodward Avenue. Find the respondent, Judith C. Lane. Did not correct the violation. On for May 9th. They are now in compliance. This declaration of violation serves as a notice that if the respondent is found in violation code section, DCO sections 105-27.1.1.1. Again, within five years from the date of this order, an immediate fine of $500 per day may be imposed. Laura. Jamie, but. Wait, wait. You have to speak up. My apologies. Can you specify the subsections, the F1, F1, and subsection 5? Okay. DCO section 105-27.1.1.1.1, F1 and 5 zoning district design standards. Thank you so much. Jamie Ballard, I'll second. Thank you. Okay. Mr. Gillette. Aye. Mr. Walensky. Aye. Ms. Hunt. Aye. Ms. Ballard. Aye. Mr. Alexander. Aye. Chair Stone. Aye. And the motion passes, and the appropriate order will issue. We have one more case against the same respondent. That's case number 25-1290, the City of Dunedin v. Judith Lane, also concerning the property at 2016 Woodward Avenue. These are violations of separate city ordinances. Are you going to speak to that as well? Yes. Okay. Good afternoon, board members. My name is Rachel Laurel, Co-Compliance Inspector for the City of Dunedin. I'll be showing you a PowerPoint presentation for property address 2016 Woodward Avenue, case number 25-1290. The respondent is Judith C. Lane. The address is 2016 Woodward Avenue. The zoning is single-family home in an R-60 zoning district. Number of violations are two of DCO Section 34-1, paren A, Environment Offensive Accumulation, subsection A. It shall be unlawful for any person to accumulate, leave, dump, or store openly on any premises with a residential zoning classification, any building materials, any building materials, and any and all other articles of personal property which may be seen from the public right away or abutting properties for a period greater than three days, unless the storage of such articles on residential premises is specifically allowed under other provisions of the code. A second violation is of DCO Section 34-32, premises to be kept clean of offensive accumulation. It shall be unlawful for the occupant or owner of any house, yard, store, lot, or parcel of land to refuse to keep the same clean or to permit any trash, weeds, or any offensive matter of any kind to accumulate in or upon such premises, and such accumulation shall be deemed to be a public nuisance. Notice of violation was posted to the property city hall and sent certified mail to the owner on April 30th, 2025, with a compliance date of May 10th, 2025. Certified mail for the notice of violation was signed for by the owner on May 2nd, 2025, at 10.23 a.m. Notice of hearing was posted to the property city hall and sent certified mail to the owner on May 21st, 2025. That certified mail for the notice of hearing was signed for by the owner on May 24th, 2025, at 2.22 p.m. Here's a picture of the front of the house on the driveway. You can see where the arrow is pointed. There's accumulation of items. There's exercise equipment. There's a toaster, a table. I believe that's a tent. There's a chest. And plastic containers. That was taken on April 22nd, 2025, when I left my door hanger. Here's a close-up of the items on the driveway. You can see there's a tire and plastic containers and chairs. And it looks like children's vests for the jet ski table. Here's a close-up of the toaster oven. And a lamp, also right below the arrow. Here's in front of the garage. You can see the chest. Laundry basket. That black box item is a computer tower. Just accumulation of personal property on the driveway. Here is a re-inspection after my door hanger on April 29th, 2025. Looks like that computer tower is now at the curb, but the rest of the items remain. On April 30th, 2025, now at the curb, there's, I believe that's a pressure washer, wood, and the items still remain in front of the garage. This is the day of my posting of my notice of violation. Here's a close-up picture. April 30th, now looks like more items are brought out. More containers, a wheelchair, other chairs, just an accumulation of stuff stored on the driveway. That was on April 30th. Here's a picture of my affidavit of posting and notice of violation posted to the front door on April 30th. Here's a re-inspection after the notice of violation. This was on May 14th, 2025. There's still some items remaining. In my posting of my notice of hearing, here's what remains of it. There's large boxes, shelves filled with items. If you look over by the fence, you can see two dollies. The tire is now moved to that location. Still plastic containers. Here's one I was walking up to the front door. Here's a different angle. You can see all the items stored on the shelves in front of the garage. And here's my affidavit of posting and notice of hearing posted to the front door, May 21st, 2025. Here's a close-up picture. Went by yesterday. There are still some items remaining. You can still see the tire and plastic containers. So, again, I put the property in compliance at this time, which is why I'm requesting compliance. I'll let you deliberate first before I make the city's recommendation. Ms. Phillips, is the gentleman you're speaking to here on this case? Sir Daniel Lane, the owner. He's late, but he is here. Okay, sir, you haven't been sworn in yet. Why don't we ask board members if they have questions of the compliance inspector first, and then we'll hear from you, sir? Okay, so it's board members. I noticed that they have that container in the driveway. Are they putting anything in it, or you did not? It was empty the day of my posting of the notice of hearing, but it came around May 21st time frame. But in the last photo, you said when you took the photo going up to the sidewalk, the door was open. Was there anything inside of it? There was nothing inside it. Okay. Not at that time. Okay. Other board members have questions? No? Okay, so you need to be sworn, and then you can come up and speak. Joan? Raise your right knee. I swear the testimony you're about to give in this proceeding is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Yes, ma'am. Okay. Can I have your name and address for the record, please? My name is Daniel Lane. My address is 2016 Woodward Avenue here in Dunedin. Thank you. Mr. Lane, before he proceeds, you're not one of the listed owners on the Pinellas Property Apparition website. Do you have some form of authorization from Ms. Lane? Actually, my mom is 84 years old, and she's disabled. She's partially blind. I have been caretaking her for a little over two years now. Thank you, Mr. Lane. Just to remind the board that he may proceed with his testimony, but it's not going to be binding as to the case itself. Okay? Right. The situation has come up before where people are caring for elderly parents. Yeah. So the respondent, Judith Lane, is your mother, is that correct? Yes, sir. Okay. And is there anything you want to tell the board about this situation? I don't know what was said before I got here. I'm sorry. I thought the hearing was at 2.30. I was at the house trying to get over here in time. Basically, my father passed away about eight months ago. I care took him for the last two years as well as my mom. He was disabled in a wheelchair and unable to get around on his own. The residents, the initial complaint was because I was having a garage sale. I don't know what took place between then and now. I didn't ever receive a copy of any complaint about the residents. There's other boats, recreational vehicles, et cetera, up and down my street, but I'm the only one that got sighted. I don't know why that is. I'd like to know who filed a complaint, if it was a complaint. All I was doing was trying to clean up the residents. And as I think the picture showed, my mom has sold her residents. The closing on it is the 24th of this month. I've been cleaning up the yard, et cetera. When they came out, I had been having a garage sale for two weeks on and off because of being there by myself. I couldn't really do a whole lot. As you saw, there was a container dropped off right around the same time as I received this letter. I spoke to this code enforcement officer on, I believe it was the 29th when she came out, and I had jet skis still parked in the front yard that were being picked up by a repair shop to be repaired to be sold. I had told the compliance officer that. And she told me if I had the jet skis moved on the 30th when she came back out, there would not be an issue, which it was done. I never wanted to have my mom have any problems with the city. We've lived here since 1972. During the hurricane, this is the first time we've ever had water anywhere close to our residence. And unfortunately, it pretty well destroyed the contents in our garage and the shed out back. So just so we're clear, there are two cases with separate docket numbers alleging different violations of various city ordinances. We've addressed the first case before you got here, unfortunately, and that had to do with the jet skis. Okay. Okay. And the second case has to do with two sections of the Dunedin ordinances that refer to the offense of accumulation and not keeping the premises clean. So without wanting to cut you off, are you saying that this property is going to be sold in the month of June? It already has sold, sir. We've already signed the contracts on it. The closing is the 24th of this month. Okay. Well, so the sale hasn't closed yet. It's under agreement is technically where it is. It's under contract. Yes, sir. And does the contract require you to leave the house in broom clean condition and to remove all personal property? No, it is as is. The sale is as is. As is? Yes, sir. We have cleaned up the property already. The property is in compliance with your ordinances. I have pictures that show can show the yards cleaned up, the pods almost all the way loaded. They're picking that up on Monday. And I do have pictures that show the residence is in compliance today. There is nothing on the property left there. I mean, I can show you the board pictures. If you do have photographs, we did see some photographs from the inspector. When were they last taken, please? Yesterday. Can you put those back up on the screen for us, please? So as you see, sir, in the lower right corner, there's a date, a digital date as to when the photographs were taken. It says June 2nd, 2025. That was yesterday, my daughter's birthday. Yes, sir. I can show you pictures from this morning where none of that's there. It's all picked up. Okay, why don't you show them to the inspectors first and then? Yes, sir. Are they on your phone? You don't have hard copies printed? Okay, why don't you show them to the inspectors then? The items are removed. In the photos that I took yesterday, those items are removed. The only thing that's left is the barbecue, which is fine. Okay, so if you have images showing compliance and you don't have hard copies, you're going to have to email them to our clerk assistant here for the board, just so that's going to be part of the evidence, okay, for your case. Yes, ma'am. I understand. Thank you. Okay, and Joan will give you the email address you should use. So in light of the photographs provided by the representative of the respondent, do we have a recommendation from the city? Case number, city's recommendation for case number 25-1290 with two violations, a DCO section 34-1 parent A, offensive accumulation, and DCO section 34-32 premises to be kept clean of offensive accumulation. If it's okay with the chairman, I would like to be able to do a re-inspection tomorrow myself, and I could take my own pictures. But in the meantime, can we give, can the city request a compliance order and have him under the compliance order? So this way, I mean, I've seen the pictures off of his phone. Well, you do have requested a compliance date of June 17th, which is two weeks. So I think we can go by the recommendation that's on the screen, and it sounds like the two of you are pretty much in agreement that most of the offensive items have been removed already. Okay. Okay, so I guess I can finish reading my slide. Requesting compliance on or before June 17, 2025, which is two weeks from today's board hearing. For the owner to remove the offensive accumulation items or given the severity of the violation is minor, I am requesting a fine in the amount of $150 per day per violation. For each day, the violation continues to exist. Okay, sir, do you understand what's being recommended? Yes, sir. You have two weeks to clean it up, and if you don't, then the fines begin to accrue. Yes, sir. You're clear on that. As I said, it is cleaned up now, and it will continue to stay cleaned up. It shouldn't be an issue then. No, sir, not at all. Okay. Thank you. So I'll entertain a motion from a board member. Lisa Hunt. Lisa? Lisa Hunt, I have a question. Before the gentleman spoke, weren't we already told that both violations were in compliance? That was a separate case. No, both cases, because she said she showed us the final picture she took yesterday and said the only thing that was out there was a couple of bins. No, her photograph showed something else. His photos showed that some of those items had been removed. The one she showed up there only had a pack rat and some bins and a barbecued, right? Correct, and then the gentleman has photographs on his phone showing that some of those items have been removed. Right. As of today, not yesterday. Right, but weren't just the couple, I mean, did you consider it still a violation if the bins were still the only thing there? It doesn't seem like it's going to be an issue. There's very few items remaining, and the property is going to close. So if you don't want to make a motion that follows the language recommended or requested by the city, you're free to make another motion. Lisa, if I could help you with that. But he didn't meet his original compliance date, so we would have still brought him. If he was totally in compliance, it would have been considered a declaration of violation. But after that compliance date, he still had items outside. Yes, she only did show one picture of the pat rat with bins and the barbecue grill, which technically can't be stored out front. So he's not 100 percent in compliance. He's 98 percent in compliance. But tomorrow, if he's in compliance, when she goes by, she can submit her affidavit of compliance. Okay, so we still have to do motion 5, not in compliance, versus affidavit of a compliance. Correct. Number 5. Okay. I move in case 25-1290, city for the property located at 2016 Woodward Avenue, to find the respondent, Judith, Judith C. Lane, in repeat violation of the city of Dunedin. No, not in repeat violation. That's what it says. Okay. I have to fix it. You're actually in number 1. Number 1. This is the first time it's come to the board. Number 1. Okay. Not number 5. This one? Okay. You're going to withdraw the beginnings of a motion. You're going to make a new motion. I withdraw motion number 5, not in compliance. Okay. All right. Lisa Hunt. Motion 1. I move in the case 25-1290 for the property located at 2016 Woodward Avenue, in violation of the city of Dunedin, code sections 34-1A and 34-32. Order the respondent, Judith C. Lane, to come into compliance before June 17, 2025. If not in compliance, a fine of $150 per day per violation will be imposed until compliance is met. The respondent is hereby ordered to contact the code compliance officer for a re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. We have a motion. I need a second. Walensky, second. Thank you. Joan. Mr. Gillette. Aye. Mr. Walensky. Aye. Ms. Hunt. Aye. Ms. Ballard. Aye. Mr. Alexander. Aye. Chair Stone. Aye. The motion passes and an order will issue. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Appreciate the board's time today. Yes. Yes, sir. Okay. So that concludes the new business before the board this afternoon. We have opportunities for members of the board to make comments, the city attorney, the city staff. Would anyone like to speak? Walensky has a question. Walensky has a question. How long can he have that container in his driveway? Up to 30 days. 30 days? Okay. Any other board members with questions or comments? No comments from me. The new member will receive a new member pocket. We'll go over Sunshine and Public Records on. And that's kind of the discussion we had earlier. So you should be up and ready to go by the July hearing. Okay. And I just wanted to make a comment, too. I was notified also about a filing that's required each year. So for the newer members, too, just to make sure that they're filing their form one, I think it is, for the financial. Correct. Yes, Lisa Hunt. I already, I also got the same thing. And when I went in and logged in and created a file, it showed that last year I didn't. Because it was sent to me, like, the same month that I was, it was, like, within days of me being accepted for the position and them wanting the information. So I hadn't even been here for long. And it shows as just that I didn't do it. So at this point, I don't know if they're going to start fining me for that. But they say that they're going to fine you. Ms. Hunt, I'll speak to you. Okay, thank you. Right. And I would just say to members of the board that you don't need to put down your assets in detail, your account numbers, or anything like that. This is more. I have one comment, which is, I think, some, but maybe not all of you know, that Joan McHale will be retiring. And this is her last meeting with us. I've worked with her now for, what, four years? Three or four years? Well, that's you. So I want to personally thank you and really express my appreciation for your guiding me through the process and becoming the chair. And I'm sure our paths will cross again on Friday afternoons. Does anyone else want to say anything? No? Well, then I hope. We appreciate you, Joan. Yeah, congratulations. And you have very hard shoes to fill. Thank you for your service and everything that you've done. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. I've enjoyed it. And do you want to share with us who will be taking your place at our next meeting, or does that not decide again? I have no idea. At this point, they're in the middle of interviews. So next month, somebody else will be sitting here. The actual day of the code board is my last day of employment. So I'll be here, but I'll be alongside my replacement. Okay. Well, thank you. Treat her good. I'm sure they'll find someone very well. Tell us where we can find you on Fridays. Not on this recording. Okay. Anybody else have any comments? If not, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn at 2.55 p.m. Jamie Ballard, so moved. Lisa Hunt, second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Aye. Okay. The meeting is officially adjourned. Thank you all. It was something that I didn't do because I, I mean, I barely had just started here, and I didn't really know what it was. It looked hokey to me. I can't wait. When, do you know when exactly you were appointed? I want to say September, and I got something in October. Okay.