Department? Present. Thank you. Paul Strobus, Assistant General Manager, Operation Division, Transportation Department? Present. Thank you. It is the Evaluation Committee's responsibility to review the vendor's submittals to ensure solicitation requirements are met and to evaluate the submittals and make a recommendation to award a contract. Each Evaluation Committee member was appointed by the County Administrator to serve on this committee based on their experience. Evaluation Committee members are responsible for following the County's established committee procedures to select vendors which provide the services that are in the best interest of the County. At the discretion of the Board, the Evaluation Committee members may be requested to substantiate their recommendation and discuss their submittal reviews. In accordance with Borough County Procurement Code, each Evaluation Committee member must affirm that they are free of conflict of interest as provided by Part 3, Chapter 112, Florida Statute, and the Borough County Employee Code of Ethics. All Evaluation Committee members and the Project Manager submitted the required Borough County disclosure forms and responded that they can be fair and impartial to all vendors. The code of silence has been in effect since the solicitation's advertisement. Vendors are prohibited from discussing the solicitation with Commissioner's Office, County staff, or a member of the Evaluation Committee. The code of silence terminates when the awarding authority takes action which ends the solicitation. During the code of silence, inquiries regarding the solicitation should be directed to the Project Manager or the Director of Purchasing and or his designee. Also, vendors may communicate with the designated representative from the Office of Economic and Small Business Development at any time regarding the solicitation's small business enterprise or county business enterprise participation. The summary of vendor rights regarding the Borough County competitive solicitation was issued in the solicitation. At this time, the purchasing agent will report on the findings on the responsiveness and responsibility and identify if any exceptions were taken to the county's terms and condition. Thank you. Thank you. Proposals were received from the following vendors. Ace Parking 3 LLC, Front Row Management Services LLC, SP Plus Curbside Management Joint Venture, waiver of technicalities or irregularities. The Director of Purchasing waived the following technicalities or irregularities in accordance with the procurement code. Two out of the three firms, Ace Parking 3 LLC and Front Row Management Services LLC submitted a scanned copy of their bid bond electronically through through BPRO with their proposal. After completing due diligence since both firms demonstrated intent to comply with the solicitation's bid bond requirements by submitting a copy of their bid bond through BPRO. Prior to the solicitation's closing date and time, the Director of Purchasing approved a waiver of technicality. The county is in receipt of both firm's original bid bonds. Responsiveness requirements. The solicitation had six responsiveness requirements involving compliance. Bid bond or bond requirement, criminal history screening practices certification, domestic partnership act certification, living wage requirements, lobbyist registration certification, and pricing requirement. The Director of Purchasing recommends that all vendors be deemed responsive to all of the responsiveness requirements. Responsibility requirements. The solicitation had seven areas of responsibility requirements. Affiliated entities of the principles, enterprise technology services vendor security questionnaire, financial information financial ability, insurance requirements, litigation history, workforce investment program requirements, and conflict of interest disclosure. All vendors provided the required documentation for evaluation committees review for responsibility. Terms and conditions. The solicitation required vendors to state whether they accept Broward County standard terms and conditions or if they do not accept them to identify the agreement provision or provisions and the vendor's proposed changes. One of three vendors, Front Row Management Services, LLC, accepted the county standard terms and conditions without exceptions. The following vendors took exceptions to the county standard terms and conditions. Ace Parking 3 LLC and SP Plus Curbside Management Joint Venture. The specific exemptions taken by these vendors are identified in each submittal and will be addressed prior to presentation if the vendor advances at the final evaluation committee meeting. This concludes Purchasing's remarks and is presented for the consideration of the evaluation committee. Thank you. Thank you. The next order of business is that is to determine vendor responsiveness as defined in the procurement code section 2140 a committee members is there any discussion regarding the determination of responsiveness hearing none may I have a motion with respect to the responsiveness of the vendor submittals state your name then your motion. This is Mike Nonamaker. I would like to make a motion to find all of the vendors responsive to the solicitation's responsiveness criteria. Thank you. May I have a second? This is Glenn Wiltshire. I'll second that motion. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. The next order of business is that is to determine the responsibility of the vendors as defined in the procurement code section 2140 B committee members is there any discussion regarding the responsibility of the vendors? Uh, yeah, this is Mike Nonamaker. I just have I do have a question. Uh, on SP plus LLC financial statements, all of the current ratios are below one. It states that one or above is a more favorable financial position. However, SP plus is now part of metropolis. Um, does that make any difference? Give me one second. Let me get her name. Is that a question for me? Financial representative? Yes. I was just going to bring you in so car. So car, you can state your name for the record and then you can address Mr. Nonamaker's question. Socar at Santish. It does not necessarily mean that they will not be able to provide the service. It just means that with the acquisition, it created a picture that kind of might skew the financials to where it wouldn't be part of their normal, um, results if they were not part of the acquisition. Does that answer the question? It does. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Committee members, is there any other question regarding the responsibility of the vendors? Just a follow up question and, you know, maybe it was in the, uh, purchasing and the memo or purchasing memo. The, the financials that were provided were actually Metropolis's financials. If I followed the memo correctly, not SP pluses. It, Sakara, I'll have you respond to that, but I believe so because they're, they're presented as a joint venture. Yes. That's correct. From what I said. Yes. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Committee members, any other questions regarding the responsibility of the vendors? Hearing no more question, may I have a motion with regards to the responsibility of the vendors? State your name, then your motion. Okay. I guess I will. Um, this is Mike Nonamaker. Um, and I'd like to make a motion to find all of the vendors responsible to the solicitation's responsibility requirements. Thank you. May I have a second? State your name first. Thurston Roos. I second the motion. Thank you. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. The next order of business is to determine the vendors that were both responsive and responsible. May I have a motion with respect to the vendors that were determined to be both responsive and responsible. To move on to the final. Kirsten Roos. I would like to make a motion to find the following vendors both responsive and responsible for the solicitation. The vendors names are Ace Parking 3, LLC, Front Row Management Services, LLC, SP Plus Curbside Management Joint Venture. Thank you. May I have a second? Glenn Wiltshire. I second that motion. Thank you. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. The final evaluation committee meeting will be held through Microsoft Teams on Tuesday, August 18, 2026 at 2 p.m. and will include vendor presentations. Committee members, the evaluation committee members establishes the length of presentation. This time does not include the unlimited questions and answers that you will have. Committee members, is there any discussion regarding the length of presentation? May I have a motion to set the length of presentation? I'll do it. I mean, normally we do 20 minutes. So, this is Mike Nanamaker. I'd like to make a motion to set the length of the presentation at 20 minutes. Thank you. May I have a second? Kirsten Roos, I second the motion. Thank you. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. As established, each vendor will have 20 minutes for their vendor presentations, followed by an unmuted question and answer session. All vendors will have five minutes to set up their Microsoft Teams, their presentation in Microsoft Teams. At this time, the purchasing agent will use a random list generator to determine the order presentation. This can be viewed on your screen momentarily. I currently have the list of the vendors in alphabetical order. In the randomizer, I will now click on the randomize button to receive the order of presentations. First presenter, Front Row Management Services, LLC. Second presenter, SP Plus Curbside Management Joint Venture. Third presenter, Ace Parking 3, LLC. Thank you. Thank you. Committee members, is there any other business you'd like to discuss today? Hearing none, we would like to thank all the vendors for submitting a response and participating in this solicitation. Committee members, thank you also for serving on this panel. The time is 3.19 p.m. This initial evaluation committee meeting is adjourned. Thank you, guys. We'll see you on the 18th. Thank you.