Try Free

Why is US political violence on the rise? — Global News Podcast

April 27, 2026 8m 1,370 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Why is US political violence on the rise? — Global News Podcast, published April 27, 2026. The transcript contains 1,370 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Welcome to the Global News Podcast. I'm Keith Adams and I'm joined by our White House correspondent in Washington, Bernd de Boosman. Now, Bernd, there are questions now being asked about the security at the event and I know there are reports that the shooter was actually staying there. It's not..."

[0:00] Welcome to the Global News Podcast. I'm Keith Adams and I'm joined by our White House correspondent [0:06] in Washington, Bernd de Boosman. Now, Bernd, there are questions now being asked about the [0:12] security at the event and I know there are reports that the shooter was actually staying there. It's [0:19] not your first time attending a White House correspondent dinner. What are we hearing? [0:24] Well, in retrospect, I think a lot of questions will be asked about how much [0:29] the hotel was secured. When I got to the hotel on Saturday night, I got there quite early to have [0:35] a drink with some friends that I knew were going to be at the dinner. When I walked in, I did think [0:40] it was quite strange that there were hotel guests clearly not going to the dinner. Everyone going [0:46] to the dinner was wearing tuxedos and evening gowns that were just kind of sitting in the lobby mingling [0:53] or walking around the bar area, which is in the lobby, very close to members of Congress or really [1:00] quite prominent journalists that do kind of face at least online threats. And that struck me as a [1:08] little odd, but I didn't think much of it. And then I think most importantly, there are many side parties [1:16] at the hotel ahead of the main reception. None of those seem to have much security at all. And at no [1:22] point was I asked to show any form of ID. I briefly showed my ticket to get in from the street. I know [1:30] of friends who walked into parties to which they were not invited. And there was no metal detector until [1:36] one kind of descended much further into the party just before the reception area where there was kind of [1:43] an hour worth of open bar and drinks. And that's where apparently this incident took place. But [1:50] many questions will be asked about how exactly this this took place and if the perimeter around the [1:57] ballroom was secure, even if the ballroom itself might have been secure. Let's broaden this out a bit [2:02] more and talk about, you know, politically motivated crime and violence in the United States. That's the [2:10] third assassination attempt, I think, on Trump. And and then we've had other violent incidents, [2:15] including the Charlie Charlie Kirk assassination. What's going on burned? Well, that's something that [2:21] there's been growing concern about even over the course of years that there's been more and more acts [2:27] of political violence. I was actually at the the shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, as well during the [2:34] Trump campaign. And to me, the the the feeling immediately after and the conversations that were [2:40] had immediately after, I mean, they they were very, very similar in my mind. And I think the the consensus [2:47] among Americans is that as society here is becoming more polarized, these incidents seem to be on the [2:54] rise. At one point several years ago, the FBI kind of warned very specifically that this was on the rise and [2:59] there's more danger of violence or even domestic terrorism than had been the the case in the past. [3:06] And, you know, but even those conversations are themselves quite polarizing. Both sides of the [3:12] political spectrum kind of blame the other for an increase in political violence. Many Democrats say, [3:18] for example, that the rhetoric from the Trump administration is is driving people to violence. [3:23] the Trump administration and President Trump himself very frequently, I should add, blame the left [3:29] for rhetoric used about the administration driving people to act against the administration. So it's [3:35] it's an issue in which no one can really agree what the cause of the problem is, even if people [3:42] broadly are concerned that there is, in fact, a problem. Yeah. And, you know, if we say that the source [3:47] of this is polarization, you know, the political polarization, what why is that burned? Why? Why [3:55] are things being stretched? Why are the two sides so far apart? Over time, I think we saw both sides of [4:02] the political spectrum kind of drift even further apart to the to the right and to the left and really [4:10] can't actually find much to agree on with regards to anything, whether it be, you know, foreign policy, [4:16] domestic policy, how one deals with crime and what's causing it. The center of United States [4:23] politics, at least in my view and in the view of, I think, many Americans has kind of fallen away. [4:29] And now there's two sides that are kind of almost polar opposites on policy issues and often using [4:36] language that is that is really quite aggressive and quite harsh about their their counterpart. There [4:42] seems to be very few people kind of aiming to, like, reach across the the aisle, as they say, [4:47] in Congress and kind of bridge that divide to actually sit down and find something that they [4:53] agree upon or something that they feel that they can work on together. It's kind of become one side [4:58] versus the other. And, you know, the one side thinking it needs to resist the other. And I think [5:05] that's all amplified on X or Instagram, Facebook, all these platforms. I think people, you know, [5:12] consume a lot of content that isn't necessarily representative of the the vast majority of [5:17] Americans who don't want this to happen, but is really quite aggressive in in character and in tone. [5:23] So it seems that you need someone to breach across and find the middle ground here. Is no one trying to [5:29] do that? Well, you know, as as is often the case after these sorts of shootings, we know, [5:34] we immediately saw statements from prominent Americans and prominent [5:38] members of the kind of political establishment calling for the temperature to be lowered. But [5:46] there doesn't actually seem to be anyone working to lower the temperature. I thought it was notable [5:51] that in the press briefing that President Trump did just about two hours after the shooting, [5:57] it didn't become necessarily a huge blame game. And he at the time seemed to be kind of trying to lower [6:03] the temperature himself. But then again, in he gave an interview to 60 Minutes the following day, [6:08] and you know, he was much less so trying to bring down the temperature. I think it's one of those [6:15] situations that many Americans will think is very unfortunate that in a few days time, it's very [6:21] possible we'll be back to a situation in which both sides of the US political divide are kind of blaming [6:27] each other for for what happened. You know, this is I saw the same thing after Butler, you know, [6:34] there was calls to to bring everyone together. And then that didn't last very, very long at all. [6:39] And I suppose with every act of violence, you know, even if it seems outrageous, [6:46] in a sense, that political violence becomes kind of normalized. [6:49] It's interesting. That's a conversation I had with many people the morning after the shooting on [6:56] Saturday, you know, once everything had settled and people had stopped working. [7:02] There was kind of a sense that, you know, this has all become quite normal. You know, [7:06] many of the reporters that were there had also been in Butler, many others had covered school [7:11] shootings or other acts of mass violence that have taken place in this country. And it's almost become [7:17] kind of a routine to a certain extent. I mean, every few weeks, there seems to be some act of [7:23] violence, political or otherwise. I think the only real difference in this incident was that the [7:30] attempted incident was in a outside a room holding the president, cabinet members and, you know, [7:37] hundreds of the most prominent journalists in the country. So the story kind of came to them [7:43] rather than them going to the story. But this happens all the time. [7:47] And I think many Americans will be wondering why this became so normalized. [7:50] Thanks, Bernd. That was Bernd de Boosman, our White House correspondent there in Washington. [7:57] And if you want to hear more from the Global News Podcast, just click the link below. Thanks for joining us.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →