Try Free

'Walang legal background': Marcoleta belittles Hontiveros at Senate session

Rappler May 27, 2026 9m 956 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of 'Walang legal background': Marcoleta belittles Hontiveros at Senate session from Rappler, published May 27, 2026. The transcript contains 956 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Mr. President, without giving meaning to anything, ito po ang mahirap kasi kung wala po tayong legal background dito. Kaya sinasabi ko na nga po, hindi po bagong motion ito eh. Hindi siya bagong motion. Kasasabi ko lang po, May 11, minub ko na po ito eh. Sino po man sasabi na bagong motion?..."

[0:00] Mr. President, without giving meaning to anything, [0:04] ito po ang mahirap kasi kung wala po tayong legal background dito. [0:09] Kaya sinasabi ko na nga po, [0:11] hindi po bagong motion ito eh. [0:14] Hindi siya bagong motion. [0:16] Kasasabi ko lang po, May 11, minub ko na po ito eh. [0:20] Sino po man sasabi na bagong motion? [0:25] Sinasabi ko lamang po, [0:26] ang sinasabi ko lang, kanina ko po po sinasabi, [0:29] ang tama yun, ang sasabi niya, ay walang kinalaman, walang alam sa batas. [0:36] Session is resumed. [0:38] Senator Cayetano. [0:40] I'm listening to the two senators, [0:42] and as I mentioned kanina na huwag na tayong gumamit ng brasuhan, et cetera, [0:47] and I see the point of Senator Risa, [0:50] but I'm also listening to Senator Marcoleta. [0:53] It's a, kumbaga sa libro, iba yung love language, [0:57] but I don't think they're meant to be any offense. [1:01] Having said that, [1:02] we're only discussing whether we will take up the amendment or not, [1:07] and we have exhausted already all the arguments. [1:11] This is a simple motion, [1:13] so I move that we divide the house, [1:16] may irritate my motion. [1:17] Then we can go into the merits, [1:18] and they can try to convince us whether or not we agree. [1:27] So the motion is to take up the amendment to our rules, [1:32] as proposed by Senator Marcoleta. [1:35] The objection is that it is not in order [1:38] because we did not follow our own rules. [1:43] Madam Chair, Madam President. [1:46] Before that. [1:47] Madam President. [1:48] Yes, we recognize Senator Irwin Tulfo. [1:51] Madam President, my question is, [1:52] why is the majority in such a hurry to tackle this motion, [2:01] this allowing a senator for justifiable reasons to attend [2:04] and participate in the session through teleconference, [2:08] whereas in Rule 14, Section 41, under B, [2:15] it is convenient to hold a session through teleconference, [2:18] teleconference, or other reliable forms of remote or electronic means [2:23] using appropriate information and communications technology system [2:27] due to force majeure, Madam President, [2:30] or the occurrence of a national emergency? [2:34] I guess, Madam President, this justifiable reason, [2:37] what is that? [2:38] Does that fall under force majeure, [2:41] or does it fall under national emergency? [2:45] Madam President. [2:45] My question is, why are we in so hurry? [2:49] Why are they, the majority, in a hurry [2:52] to tackle this motion and divide the House, Madam President? [2:58] I need, we need answers in the minority. [3:01] Madam Chair. [3:01] Or is it because, Madam Chair, [3:04] they are in a hurry because of news reports [3:06] that probably two of our colleagues might land in jail this weekend? [3:11] Is that the reason why? [3:12] Is that the reason why they have to have this inserted, [3:16] the Section 41C, [3:19] para makaboto po kung sino man yung makukulong [3:22] dahil sa announcement ng ombudsman [3:26] na may lalabas po ang warat [3:29] ng ilan sa mga kasama natin, Madam President? [3:32] That is my question, Madam President. [3:33] Madam Chair, [3:34] the gentleman is out of order [3:37] because his question, [3:39] sanong mamadali, [3:41] bakit, [3:42] can be discussed [3:43] in the actual motion, [3:47] can be discussed [3:48] after the motion [3:50] whether we should take it up. [3:52] We take offense [3:52] that [3:53] bibigyan niya ng ganyang kulay. [3:56] It's just like us saying, [3:57] are you afraid [3:58] if we have the [3:59] hearing on [4:00] the Blue Ribbon [4:01] on flood control, [4:02] eh, [4:02] mababanggit ka rin. [4:03] You do not make that kind of [4:05] statements here in the Senate [4:06] because you assume [4:08] good faith from everyone. [4:10] That rule, [4:11] hindi minadali. [4:12] May 11 pa huyon. [4:14] So, Madam Chair, [4:15] I move that we [4:16] divide the House. [4:19] And the voting [4:19] will be done [4:20] via Viva Voche? [4:21] Madam President. [4:23] Minority Leader. [4:25] I move to adjourn [4:27] or a quorum call. [4:33] At isha hire presidents, [4:38] Madam President. [4:40] So, [4:41] I only see [4:42] the minority leader [4:43] representing the minority. [4:46] The others had left. [4:47] Madam Chair, [4:49] we will not object [4:51] but for the record, [4:53] they scumpered out [4:54] and left the minority leader [4:56] instead of discussing [4:58] the rule. [4:59] We are not even [5:01] discussing the rule yet. [5:04] And then, [5:05] ganun na yung [5:07] allegation nila. [5:08] And no one [5:09] from the minority [5:10] stood up [5:11] to say [5:11] that out of order [5:13] si Senator [5:14] Irwin [5:16] Tulfo. [5:17] So, [5:18] we will not object, [5:19] Madam Chair. [5:20] In fact, [5:20] we move that we [5:21] adjourn till [5:22] 5 p.m. [5:23] Monday. [5:24] Before that, [5:26] Madam President, [5:27] motion to adjourn [5:28] is not debatable. [5:30] Akala ko ba, [5:31] magaling cerebrals. [5:32] We're not debating [5:33] we're not debating [5:35] with the minority [5:35] inquiry, Madam President. [5:37] We're not debating, [5:38] Madam Chair. [5:40] Parliamentary inquiry. [5:42] Yes, [5:42] Senator McCullough. [5:43] Nung pong nagsimula tayo, [5:45] Madam, [5:45] meron po ba tayong [5:46] quorum? [5:50] We had a quorum, [5:51] yes. [5:52] Yes, Madam President. [5:54] Kapagka po ba [5:55] nag-walk out [5:56] ang minority, [5:57] nawawala po yung quorum, [5:58] nagsimula po tayong [5:59] may quorum. [5:59] It doesn't matter [6:00] if they walk out. [6:02] Yes, sir. [6:02] I think we still [6:03] have the quorum. [6:04] Madam President, [6:06] Madam President, [6:07] once there is [6:08] a quorum call, [6:09] you have to call the roll. [6:12] Kahit nakapresent lahat [6:14] o kulang kanina [6:15] o there was a [6:16] motion to dispense, [6:17] whatever that is. [6:19] Not upon a situation, [6:20] Madam President, [6:21] when they readily [6:23] and willingly walk out. [6:24] Takes presidents. [6:25] Hindi po yung [6:26] cover the roll natin, [6:27] Madam President. [6:28] As reiterated [6:30] by the Senate President [6:31] and as conveyed [6:32] by the minority leader [6:34] former Senate President, [6:35] the rule states [6:37] that the motion [6:38] to adjourn [6:39] takes precedence [6:40] and not taking sides [6:41] and we will [6:43] adjourn session [6:44] until 5 p.m. [6:47] on Monday, [6:48] June 1st, [6:50] 2026. [6:51] June 2nd? [6:52] June 1st? [6:53] June 1. [6:54] The birthday [6:55] of Senator Lakson. [6:56] So we will have [6:57] cooler heads. [7:08] June 2nd? [7:09] June 2nd? [7:10] June 2nd? [7:11] June 2nd? [7:12] June 2nd? [7:13] June 2nd? [7:14] June 2nd? [7:15] June 2nd? [7:16] June 2nd? [7:17] June 2nd? [7:18] June 2nd? [7:19] June 2nd? [7:20] June 2nd? [7:21] June 2nd? [7:22] June 2nd? [7:23] June 2nd? [7:24] June 2nd? [7:25] June 2nd? [7:26] June 2nd? [7:27] June 2nd? [7:28] June 2nd? [7:29] June 2nd? [7:30] June 2nd? [7:31] June 2nd? [7:32] June 2nd? [7:33] June 2nd? [7:34] June 2nd? [7:34] June 2nd? [7:35] June 2nd? [7:36] Thank you. [8:06] Thank you. [8:37] Thank you. [9:09] Thank you. [9:40] Thank you.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →