About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Trump says, 'We win regardless': US–Iran talks intensify over strait of Hormuz crisis, published April 12, 2026. The transcript contains 2,528 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"President Donald Trump has just addressed the latest talks with Iran. He says the U.S. has won. Look, regardless, we win. Regardless of what happens, we win. We've totally defeated that country. And so let's see what happens. Maybe they make a deal, maybe they don't. From the standpoint of America,"
[0:00] President Donald Trump has just addressed the latest talks with Iran. He says the U.S. has won.
[0:11] Look, regardless, we win. Regardless of what happens, we win. We've totally defeated that country.
[0:20] And so let's see what happens. Maybe they make a deal, maybe they don't.
[0:25] From the standpoint of America, we win. One of the things that's happening is that boats are sailing up
[0:31] and heading out to our country. Beautiful tankers. And we're loading them up with oil and gas and everything else.
[0:39] And it's a pretty beautiful thing to see.
[0:49] We're going to see what happens. We're in very deep negotiations with Iran.
[0:56] We win regardless. We've defeated them militarily.
[1:00] They've dropped a couple of water mines. You call them water mines in the boat.
[1:05] We've defeated all of their water boats, too. Their navy has gone 158 ships.
[1:10] They have 28 water droppers, mine droppers, they call them.
[1:14] All of them are sunk. They probably have a couple of mines in the water.
[1:18] We have mine sweepers out there. We're sweeping these straight.
[1:22] In addition to that, we're negotiating. Whether we make a deal or not makes no difference to me.
[1:28] Joining us now from Islamabad is Abbas Aslani. He's a senior research fellow at the Tehran-based
[1:35] Center for Middle East Strategic Studies. Good to have you with us. I'm sure you heard
[1:39] Donald Trump's comments there saying whether we make a deal or not makes no difference.
[1:44] How is that likely to go down with the Iranian side now?
[1:48] Sami, you know, Trump was saying that regardless of what is happening, they've been so.
[1:58] But, you know, following the recent aggression against Iran, they failed to achieve, you know,
[2:06] strategic objectives. That's why they offered Iran to come and negotiate and also establish a ceasefire.
[2:14] For high stakes diplomacy of this kind, you know, ups and downs, back and forth, or even gradual progress
[2:21] is somehow normal. And we have been seeing these kind of, let's say, developments in the past negotiations.
[2:30] But what is important at the moment is that the two sides have been able to enter to drafting phase,
[2:36] meaning that regarding the framework, they have been able to make some progress.
[2:42] But the second point that they are yet in the city, you know, engaging in talks and continuing the
[2:48] discussions after the midnight and early in the morning, this indicates that, you know,
[2:57] maybe gradual progress is being made. But in the meantime, you know, some sticking points remain.
[3:05] We were expecting these tough and challenging negotiations. This is not something that could
[3:11] be resolved overnight.
[3:13] Abbas, what do you make of reports, which we've heard reported actually by two of our correspondents
[3:21] earlier, one there in Islamabad, one in Tehran, saying they're hearing that the point,
[3:27] one of the major points of contention that they've run into is the Straits of Hormuz.
[3:32] Is it about the timing for the opening or the full opening of the Straits of Hormuz?
[3:41] Well, that is about maybe the timing and the quality, you know, of the reopening,
[3:48] because according to the previously agreed framework, there were some, you know, arrangements
[3:55] in place. We are seeing that the United States is shifting its position in the past few days.
[4:02] They want to somehow change what they, what has been agreed in the, you know, Pakistani brokerage
[4:09] ceasefire agreement. That's why this has changed to be a sticking point in the ongoing discussions.
[4:16] Also, Iran controlling the Straits for a safe passage of the vessels, in addition to charge,
[4:24] you know, tolls from those tankers that are passing the waterway are among the discussions.
[4:32] And the Iran insists that this is a significant and among its core demands that cannot be subject
[4:40] to compromises. So American side seems to be somehow pushing back against the Iranian position.
[4:47] So that's why we are seeing that they have yet engaged in high level discussions in the city,
[4:53] which tells us that they want to make some decisions and that could be somehow decisive in
[5:00] setting the trajectory ahead, whether we will be having more discussions at high level tomorrow
[5:06] or technical one, and how much hopeful we could be about the process. And let's not forget, Sami,
[5:12] that this is just the beginning and not the end game. Some other issues also remain to be addressed.
[5:19] And we are in a stage that the countries want to somehow leave behind the past few weeks'
[5:27] disagreements or, you know, tensions to see if they can continue the path down the road in a manner
[5:34] that, you know, tell us if a potential agreement would then reach or not.
[5:39] All right. Abbas Aslani, Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Middle East Strategic Studies.
[5:45] Thanks for joining us. You joined us from Islamabad.
[5:51] Iranian and U.S. conditions for ending the war appear to show some major differences.
[5:56] You see, Washington's list hasn't been published, but U.S. media leaks suggest it includes
[6:01] a 30-day ceasefire, while Iran is calling for a complete halt to strikes and guarantees against
[6:08] future attacks. The U.S. wants three of Iran's nuclear facilities to be dismantled, Tehran to never
[6:17] develop a nuclear weapon and to stop the enrichment of uranium. Tehran rules out any restrictions on its
[6:24] enrichment program. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is a key U.S. demand. Iran wants guarantees
[6:31] it will get sovereignty over the waterway. The U.S. also wants Iran to end its support for regional
[6:38] non-state allies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. Iran is demanding the U.S. and
[6:45] Israel stop the war on all fronts, including fighting its regional allies. The two-week ceasefire between
[6:54] the U.S. and Iran has led to optimism about the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. But traffic remains
[6:59] at a fraction of normal levels and hundreds of ships are still stranded. Omikulsum Sharif explains.
[7:07] Before the war, more than 100 ships transited the Strait of Hormuz every single day. That's more than 36,000
[7:15] tankers a year. Now, 20 percent of global oil and natural gas pass through this critical waterway.
[7:23] But Iran's effective closure of it has stranded hundreds of oil tankers and other ships in the
[7:29] Gulf. Now, this is what we can see since Tuesday, the day of the ceasefire. And this image is from
[7:36] marinetraffic.com that lets us track vessel movements in real time. And what we see here is very little
[7:43] movement around the bend. But we see many ships that are stranded on either side. Now, before the
[7:50] truce was announced, U.S. President Donald Trump had said reopening the Strait was a requirement for
[7:56] any deal. Now, Tehran, for its part, says the passage of ships needs to be coordinated with its military.
[8:04] Now, the state news agency has released this map from Iran's Revolutionary Guard.
[8:08] It basically outlines a new route for ships to take. To simplify, I have this image here. And Iran's
[8:17] Revolutionary Guard are basically saying that ships need to travel, sail through Iranian waters right
[8:23] around Laruk Island and pass out this way and avoid the earlier normal path for the risk of naval
[8:30] mines. So the new path is effectively this way. Tehran has also indicated under a new deal,
[8:40] under a new permanent deal, they would seek to charge a fee for ships transiting the Strait of
[8:46] Hormuz. Now, Tehran's effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz since the start of the war has
[8:52] continued to roll energy markets. And supplies have further been hit with attacks on energy infrastructure
[9:00] right across the region, from Saudi Arabia, the world's largest crude oil exporter, to Qatar,
[9:06] a global leading LNG exporter.
[9:11] Joining us from Washington DC now is Gordon Gray. He's a former U.S. Ambassador and Deputy Assistant
[9:18] Secretary of State for Near East Affairs. And Mohsen Farghani. He joins us from Isfahan in Iran. He's an
[9:26] Assistant Professor at the University of Isfahan. Let me start with Ambassador Gray. So we've had these latest
[9:34] statements by Donald Trump drop, saying basically, whether we make a deal or not makes no difference
[9:42] to me. We've already won. And he's saying this after dispatching a figure as senior as his vice
[9:50] president to talks. How do we reconcile these two different messages on whether he really cares
[9:57] about talks and making a deal? Well, we can't reconcile the two statements. And
[10:06] that's why I would just disregard the statement that you just played, saying that he doesn't care
[10:12] about a deal. He obviously cares very deeply about a deal. The reason for that is that the U.S. economy
[10:21] has gone in the wrong direction. The gas prices are way up. The inflation rate for March is up
[10:33] significantly as well. And this is the president who campaigned on the promise that he would
[10:40] bring down the inflation rate. He won the election because of concerns about then-President Biden's
[10:48] handling of the economy. And he's the president who, just four days before the war, in his State
[10:53] of the Union address, was bragging about lowering the price of gasoline. Moreover, the war is very
[11:01] unpopular in the United States because he's never really explained the rationale for it. If he didn't
[11:08] care about making a deal, he wouldn't have sent his vice president, his golfing buddy, Mr. Witkoff,
[11:15] and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Okay. Mohsin, Ines Fahal,
[11:23] is it a good sign, at least, that the talks are going this late into the night, with some indication,
[11:31] at least from the Iranian side, that they'll be going into tomorrow? First of all, I should say
[11:40] that the current conditions are highly flawed and subject to change at any moment. But as it's
[11:48] lasting actually is showing that both teams are working very hard, especially, you know,
[11:56] I believe Iran's team, they are, you know, struggling very much because actually before
[12:05] these meetings, these negotiations round, all the 10 conditions of Iran were accepted.
[12:14] But now we are facing stalemating of the American team against those conditions that they have already
[12:23] accepted. And also Trump has, you know, published that statement of Dr. Iraqji in his Truth Social.
[12:35] Then this lasting means that Iran is embracing actually, you know, peace negotiations. We
[12:46] we are against, you know, bloodshed and slaughtering. But I hope that the U.S. team is about to,
[12:55] you know, you know, making a kind of distance from this kind of old hegemonic discourse,
[13:06] which is now outdated. And they look for these negotiations as positive points.
[13:16] Ambassador Gray, we are hearing that one of the major sticking points at this point in time
[13:23] is the Straits of Hormuz. Now, we've also heard different messages from Donald Trump about the
[13:29] Straits of Hormuz. Less than 24 hours ago, he indicated that the U.S. would not accept Iranian
[13:36] charging of of tolls, control over the Straits of Hormuz. But we also did hear several days ago,
[13:45] he indicated that maybe him and the Ayatollah will be controlling the Straits of Hormuz.
[13:51] Do we know exactly what is the U.S. demand at this point in the talks for the Straits of Hormuz?
[13:57] What are they asking the Iranian side to do now?
[14:00] I think the U.S. demand for the Strait of Hormuz will be to open them and allow them to the
[14:12] free flow of tankers and other commercial vessels through the through the strait. As you point out,
[14:21] President Trump's been all over the place on the question of tolls, which, you know, on one hand,
[14:31] is strange, but on the other hand, gives his negotiating team and the Iranians some flexibility
[14:38] to find a middle ground that both countries can live with.
[14:42] Okay, that's an interesting point. Briefly, Mohsin, what is the likelihood,
[14:47] looking at this from the Iranian delegation's perspective, I'm guessing the Strait of Hormuz is one of
[14:51] their main weapons in their negotiating arsenal. How likely is it that they might agree to remove
[15:00] all restrictions, especially at this point, would they prefer to keep their control of the
[15:06] Straits of Hormuz to try and increase the negotiating pressure until the end of talks?
[15:14] You know, this is not just a kind of pressure instrument. Actually, also, I heard that your
[15:22] colleague in Islamabad said that Iran's position on Strait of Hormuz is maximalist, but it is not.
[15:28] You know, actually, this is a condition that was accepted by Trump. And actually,
[15:35] this is officially accepted by Trump. And when did Donald Trump accept the Iranian position on
[15:42] Straits of Hormuz? I believe that we are not going to lose our achievements. This is our achievement.
[15:51] And we're going to keep it. Gun, you know, for sure. No, but I was asking you to clarify,
[15:58] because it sounded like you said Donald Trump had accepted the Iranian position on Straits of Hormuz,
[16:02] and I'm not sure what you're referring to. You're saying that Trump has accepted it. Of course,
[16:13] you know, the statement that Dr. Orochi has published, also, Trump has republished that.
[16:20] You know, it means that they have accepted our 10 conditions. You mean the 10 points,
[16:26] the statement he made at the beginning of the ceasefire that, well, he said it was a workable,
[16:31] he called it workable. So, yes, I mean, perhaps trying to get into the mind and meaning.
[16:38] You know, this is a game with words. You know, this is a game with words that, you know,
[16:44] he likes always playing with words and creating new narratives, you know.
[16:49] Right. Actually, to begin our diplomacy, again, and these two weeks' negotiations,
[16:58] we have made these 10 conditions totally clear for the American team to enter to these negotiations.
[17:06] Sure. All right, Mohsen, I'm sorry, I want to try and bring…
[17:09] I want to try and bring… It cannot be acceptable.
[17:12] Understood. Just for the sake of time and moving the discussion on. So, Ambassador Gray,
[17:17] what we're hearing from the Iranian media, at least, is that this is the last chance to sort out
[17:22] a framework. Does that indicate that the talks haven't gone really deeply into some of the really
[17:29] substantive issues like uranium enrichment and to what degree and, you know, some of the really big
[17:37] issues here? I'd be very surprised if they were able to delve into details on
[17:45] issues which, as you point out, are very complicated issues such as enrichment and the like.
[17:55] And look how long it took to negotiate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or the JCPOA,
[18:03] for example. My guess is that each side gave opening statements where they staked out their position on
[18:10] enrichment. But the idea that they'd be able to make any progress on that in just a single day would
[18:19] be very surprising to me. Okay. I'd love to continue, but I'm afraid we are out of time. So,
[18:27] let me thank our guests. Ambassador Gordon Gray, he's a former ambassador and deputy assistant secretary of
[18:33] state for Near Eastern affairs. Mohsen Farhani, professor of foreign policy, media and grassroots
[18:40] movements at the University of Asfahan. Thank you both for joining us.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →