Try Free

Sources: Trump admin. debates releasing transcript of Maxwell DOJ interview

CNN May 16, 2026 8m 1,578 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Sources: Trump admin. debates releasing transcript of Maxwell DOJ interview from CNN, published May 16, 2026. The transcript contains 1,578 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"breaking news sources tell cnn that the trump administration is considering whether to make an audio recording and transcripts of delane maxwell's interview with the justice department public cnn's elena train is back with us from the white house what can you tell us elena yeah that's right well..."

[0:00] breaking news sources tell cnn that the trump administration is considering whether [0:04] to make an audio recording and transcripts of delane maxwell's interview with the justice [0:09] department public cnn's elena train is back with us from the white house what can you tell us elena [0:16] yeah that's right well first i would point out pamela that it wasn't previously known that they [0:20] actually had made an audio recording of the deputy attorney general todd blanche's interview with [0:26] delane maxwell which we know occurred over the period of two days um a couple weeks ago last [0:31] month and essentially from what we're hearing from both sources within the justice department [0:36] and here at the white house um you know three senior administration officials told us that [0:40] what's currently being discussed is whether or not they want to make the audio and the transcripts [0:46] of that meeting uh public now we know that they are going through and digitizing some of the audio [0:52] we were told by one official that the interviews were more than 10 hours and also going through [0:57] transcribing it and of course redacting parts of it where maybe victims names who have not been [1:03] previously made public trying to redact those if they do ultimately release this information now i [1:08] think a big question of course is we all knew that blanche went to florida to have a sit down with [1:13] maxwell one of epstein's associates who is currently serving a 20-year term uh for some sex crimes that [1:19] she was engaged in along with epstein and the question was are you even going to share any of [1:24] that information now we're learning that that is of course a big topic of conversation between [1:29] people here at the white house and the justice department some of the people we spoke with said [1:33] that they want to release this information sooner rather than later they believe that the trump [1:37] administration needs to be more in control of the optics of all of this others said you know they [1:43] believe that the epstein story story has largely died down right now and they would prefer not to [1:49] resurface that at this moment but all to say it's a big topic of conversation we could see some of [1:56] this information come to light shortly i would also note uh that we did hear from white house [2:02] communications director steven chung who essentially said that he believed that this is nothing more than [2:06] cnn trying to desperately to create news out of old news he was pointing to a newsmax interview the [2:13] president did last week where he essentially said that he would like to release everything but that [2:18] we don't want to people to get hurt that shouldn't be hurt he also argued that he hadn't at this point [2:23] this interview was done friday that the president argued he hadn't spoken directly with blanche about [2:28] this so all to say this is new information that we of course had not known before the fact that there is an [2:34] auto recording of this and that perhaps the white house is going to release this transcript of all [2:39] everyone kind of staying by to see what ultimately they will do pamela all right elena thanks so much [2:44] joining us now seeing a senior legal analyst ellie honig ellie's a former federal and state prosecutor [2:50] what's your reaction ellie to the justice department considering releasing of deputy attorney general [2:56] todd blanche's interview that went on for hours and hours with maxwell well if it's significant first [3:03] of all to know that an electronic recording actually exists that's actually in compliance [3:08] with doj policy that's been in place the last decade or so that says when you are interviewing a [3:14] federally incarcerated defendant you are supposed to electronically record it and so that means [3:19] if this comes out we will have a verbatim record of what was said we won't have to rely [3:23] on someone's notes or testimony which can be fallible at times the other thing that's really [3:28] important to note is the decision whether to release this is entirely the justice department's [3:33] it sits in pam bondy's hands this is not a grand jury testimony so they don't need to go to a judge so [3:40] the decision here whether to put this out is 100 up to pam bondy how common is it ellie for the u.s [3:46] justice department to publicly release this type of recording it's extremely uncommon almost unheard [3:54] of wolf if we're talking about prosecutors going into a prison to speak with somebody who's a [3:59] defendant who's a potential witness potential cooperating witness you would never publicize [4:05] and put out and and make and disclose publicly the interview that you had with that person that [4:10] would be an investigative file that would be something you would keep in house you would never put [4:15] it out but of course a lot of what we've seen here is happening outside of the normal track well cnn is [4:20] learning this morning that the justice department has an audio recording and transcript of the [4:25] interview conducted with epstein's accomplice gilene maxwell and the administration has been [4:31] considering releasing that publicly what do you think about that would you support it i would support [4:39] it i mean it was a very unusual interview to begin with it's very unusual that she's been moved to the [4:45] prison that she is in people we need transparency right now the just the lack of transparency [4:52] the uh what appears to be a desire by the white house to hide uh what is there let's just see [4:59] what it is i mean this man was disgusting he is guilty of horrific crimes we are forgetting that there [5:05] are victims that are still recovering more than a thousand of them we need to know what the facts are and [5:13] then we need to move on because quite frankly not the democrats it's the republicans in the congress that are [5:19] keeping business that needs to get done for the people of this country by blocking rules to consider [5:26] anything well there are two victims at least two who actually wrote the court um and their identities [5:33] are anonymous right now but they're concerned that they could be exposed with the release of grand [5:38] jury testimony right um they say that this is political warfare and that um there are people are [5:44] being insensitive to these victims how can congress simultaneously push for transparency while also [5:49] protecting the victims here i think the victims have a right to have their names uh not made public [5:58] i think that there have been uh you can we we know that there's an ability to hide their names yet talk [6:05] about what the facts and the some of it was i have unfortunately i mean i'm glad that the person felt [6:12] that they could come forward and talk to me they're scared to death they don't want their name to become [6:19] public or become part of a hate tunnel you know people don't understand what happens to people uh when [6:26] their name becomes public people that have don't know them they have no facts just go after them in all [6:33] kinds of horrific brutal bullying frightening threatening ways they've already been victims they [6:42] want to move on with their life and they're scared to death about what is going to happen if their [6:47] names become public so tell us a little bit more about that conversation you had and you know they [6:54] you said they want to move on with their life and yet you know the democrats and republicans are calling [6:59] for more transparency that which will only keep this out there in the headlines i think that the calling [7:06] for transparency is is there a list is there a list of you know here's what okay it wasn't democrats who [7:14] called for this as part of his campaign he said he would make the jeffrey epstein list public the attorney [7:23] general stood in front of the white house and said i have the list on my desk we will make this public [7:30] they said to their mega base we're going to be transparent we're going to tell everybody what happened [7:35] but you know when you release a list it's of the abusers it isn't of the victims in this country [7:41] we have tried very hard to protect the victims i'm somebody who works in domestic violence abuse every [7:49] single day trying to help people they should not ever have their names they're sexual assault i've helped [7:55] some who've been victims of sexual they're survivors they're not they don't want to be called victims [8:00] their names should not be made public it's hard enough for people that just are like that when [8:06] you take a case like the jeffrey epstein case which is on the minds of millions of people across this [8:14] country there are people that are not kind there are people that are mean and brutal there are people [8:21] from other countries that are trying to stir up more trouble in our country and those survivors [8:29] become victims again by the sheer hatred and brutality that people put towards them [8:36] not you know some of us have empathy and compassion but that's not what they feel [8:40] they feel the hate that comes at them and we need to understand that's happening too much in our country [8:45] period on social media

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →