About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Paxman vs Russell Brand - full interview - BBC Newsnight from BBC Politics, published June 28, 2026. The transcript contains 2,333 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Russell Brand, who are you to edit a political magazine? Well, I suppose like a person who's been politely asked by an attractive woman. I don't know what the typical criteria is. I don't know many people that edit political magazines. Boris, he used to do one, didn't he? So I'm a person with crazy"
[0:04] Russell Brand, who are you to edit a political magazine?
[0:07] Well, I suppose like a person who's been politely asked by an attractive woman.
[0:12] I don't know what the typical criteria is.
[0:14] I don't know many people that edit political magazines.
[0:16] Boris, he used to do one, didn't he?
[0:18] So I'm a person with crazy hair, quite a good sense of humour,
[0:21] don't know much about politics, I'm ideal.
[0:23] But is it true you don't even vote?
[0:25] Yeah, no, I don't vote.
[0:27] Well, how do you have any authorities to talk about politics then?
[0:30] Well, I don't get my authority from this pre-existing paradigm
[0:33] which is quite narrow and only serves a few people.
[0:36] I look elsewhere for alternatives that might be of service to humanity.
[0:42] Alternate means alternate political systems.
[0:45] They being?
[0:46] Well, I've not invented it yet, Jeremy.
[0:47] I had to do a magazine last week, I've had a lot on me plate.
[0:50] But I say, but here's the thing it shouldn't do.
[0:53] Shouldn't destroy the planet, shouldn't create massive economic disparity,
[0:57] shouldn't ignore the needs of the people.
[0:59] The burden of proof is on the people with the power,
[1:02] not people like doing a magazine.
[1:03] How do you imagine that people get power?
[1:07] Well, I imagine there are sort of hierarchical systems
[1:09] that have been preserved through generations.
[1:11] They get power by being voted in, that's how they get it.
[1:12] Well, you say that, Jeremy, but like...
[1:13] You can't even be asked to vote.
[1:14] It's quite a narrow, quite a narrow prescriptive parameter
[1:18] that changes within the...
[1:20] In a democracy, that's how it works.
[1:21] Well, I don't think it's working very well, Jeremy,
[1:24] given that the planet is being destroyed,
[1:25] given that there is economic disparity of a huge degree.
[1:28] What are you saying? There's no alternative.
[1:29] There's no alternative, just this system.
[1:30] No, I'm not saying that.
[1:31] I'm saying if you can't be asked to vote,
[1:33] why should we be asked to listen to your political point of view?
[1:35] You don't have to listen to my political point of view,
[1:37] but it's not that I'm not voting out of apathy.
[1:40] I'm not voting out of absolute indifference and weariness
[1:43] and exhaustion from the lies, treachery, deceit
[1:46] of the political class that has been going on for generations now,
[1:49] and which has now reached fever pitch,
[1:51] where we have a disenfranchised, disillusioned, despondent underclass
[1:55] that are not being represented by that political system.
[1:57] So voting for it is tacit complicity with that system,
[2:01] and that's not something I'm offering up.
[2:02] Well, why don't you change it, then?
[2:04] I'm trying to.
[2:05] Well, why don't you start by voting?
[2:07] I don't think it works.
[2:08] People have voted already,
[2:09] and that's what's created the current paradigm.
[2:11] When did you last vote?
[2:12] Never.
[2:13] You've never, ever voted?
[2:14] No. Do you think that's really bad?
[2:16] So you struck an attitude, what, before the age of 18?
[2:19] Well, I was busy being a drug addict at that point,
[2:20] because I come from the kind of social conditions
[2:22] that are exacerbated by an indifferent system
[2:24] that really just administrates for large corporations
[2:26] and ignores the population that it was voted in to serve.
[2:29] You're blaming the political class for the fact that you had a drug problem?
[2:32] No, no, no.
[2:33] I'm saying I was part of a social and economic class
[2:36] that is underserved by the current political system,
[2:39] and drug addiction is one of the problems it creates
[2:41] when you have huge, underserved, impoverished populations.
[2:45] People get drug problems,
[2:46] and also don't feel like they want to engage with the current political system
[2:50] because they see that it doesn't work for them.
[2:52] They see that it makes no difference.
[2:54] They see that they're not served.
[2:55] Of course it doesn't work for them if they didn't bother to vote.
[2:57] Jeremy, my darling,
[2:58] I'm not saying that the apathy doesn't come from us, the people.
[3:01] The apathy comes from the politicians.
[3:03] They are apathetic to our needs.
[3:04] They're only interested in servicing the needs of corporations.
[3:06] Look at what, ain't the Tories going to court
[3:08] and taking the EU to court
[3:10] because they're trying to curtail bank bonuses?
[3:12] Is that what's happening at the moment in our country?
[3:14] It is, isn't it?
[3:15] So why am I going to tune in for that?
[3:17] You don't believe in democracy.
[3:18] No, I need to.
[3:18] You want a revolution, don't you?
[3:20] The planet is being destroyed.
[3:21] We are creating an underclass.
[3:23] We are exploiting poor people all over the world
[3:25] and the genuine and legitimate problems of the people
[3:27] are not being addressed by our political class.
[3:29] All of those things may be true.
[3:31] They are true.
[3:32] But you took...
[3:33] I wouldn't argue with you about many of them.
[3:35] Well, how come I feel so cross with you?
[3:37] It can't just be because of that beard.
[3:39] It's gorgeous.
[3:39] It's possibly because...
[3:40] And if the Daily Mail don't want it, I do.
[3:42] I'm against them.
[3:44] Grow it longer.
[3:45] Tangle it into your armpit hair.
[3:46] You are a very trivial man.
[3:49] What do you think?
[3:49] I am trivial?
[3:50] Yes.
[3:50] A minute ago, you were having a go at me because I wanted a revolution.
[3:53] Now I'm trivial.
[3:54] I'm bouncing about a lovely place.
[3:55] I'm not having a go at you because you want a revolution.
[3:57] Many people want a revolution, but I'm asking you what it would be like.
[4:00] Well, I think what it won't be like is a huge disparity between rich and poor, where 300
[4:06] Americans have the same amount of wealth as the 85 million poorest Americans, where there
[4:13] is an exploited and underserved underclass that are being continually ignored, where
[4:17] welfare is slashed, while Cameron and Osborne go to court to defend the rights of bankers
[4:22] to continue receiving their bonuses.
[4:25] That's all I'm saying.
[4:25] What's the scheme?
[4:26] That's all I'm asking.
[4:27] What's the scheme?
[4:28] You talk vaguely about revolution.
[4:30] What is it?
[4:31] I think a socialist egalitarian system based on the massive redistribution of wealth, heavy
[4:35] taxation of corporations and massive responsibility for energy companies and any companies that's
[4:40] exploiting the environment, I think the very concept of profit should be hugely reduced.
[4:46] David Cameron says profit isn't a dirty word.
[4:48] I say profit is a filthy word because wherever there is profit, there is also deficit.
[4:52] And this system currently doesn't address these ideas.
[4:55] And so why would anyone vote for it?
[4:56] Why would anyone be interested in it?
[4:58] Who would levy these taxes?
[5:00] I think we do need to, like, there needs to be a centralised administrative system, but
[5:03] built on...
[5:03] A government?
[5:04] Yes, I...
[5:05] There needs to be a government?
[5:06] Well, maybe call it something else.
[5:07] Call them like the admin bods, so they don't get ahead of themselves.
[5:09] And how would they be chosen?
[5:11] Jeremy, don't ask me to sit here in an interview with you in a bloody hotel room and devise a
[5:16] global utopian system.
[5:17] I'm merely pointing out that the current...
[5:19] You're not calling for revolution?
[5:20] Yeah, absolutely.
[5:22] Absolutely.
[5:22] I'm calling for change.
[5:24] I'm calling for genuine alternatives.
[5:26] But there are many people who would agree with you.
[5:28] Good.
[5:28] The current system is not engaging with all sorts of problems.
[5:31] Yes.
[5:32] And they feel apathetic.
[5:34] Really apathetic.
[5:35] But if they were to take you seriously and not to vote...
[5:39] Yeah, they shouldn't vote.
[5:40] They should...
[5:40] That's one thing they should do.
[5:41] Don't bother voting.
[5:42] Because then when it reaches...
[5:43] There's a point...
[5:43] So these little valves, these sort of, like, little cosy little valves of recycling and
[5:48] Prius and, like, you know, turn up somewhere, it stops us reaching the pit point where you
[5:52] think, oh, this is enough now.
[5:53] Stop voting.
[5:54] Stop pretending.
[5:55] Wake up.
[5:56] Be in reality now.
[5:57] Time to be in reality now.
[5:58] Why vote?
[5:59] We know it's not going to make any difference.
[6:00] We know that already.
[6:01] It does make a difference.
[6:02] I have more impact at West Ham United.
[6:04] cheering them on.
[6:05] And they lost the city unnecessarily Saturday.
[6:08] Okay, well, now you're being facetious.
[6:10] Well, facetiousness has as much value as seriousness.
[6:13] I think you're making the mistake of mistaking seriousness.
[6:16] We're not going to solve world problems by facetiousness.
[6:19] We're not going to solve them with the current system.
[6:20] At least facetiousness is funny.
[6:23] Sometimes.
[6:24] Yeah, yeah, sometimes, Jeremy.
[6:26] So listen, so let's approach this optimistically.
[6:28] You've spent your whole career berating and haranguing politicians.
[6:31] And then when, like me, a comedian goes, yeah, they're all worthless.
[6:34] What's the point in engaging with any of them?
[6:35] You sort of have a go at me because I'm not poor anymore.
[6:38] No, I'm not having a go at you about that.
[6:40] I'm just asking you why would you take you seriously when you're so unspecific?
[6:45] You don't have to take it.
[6:46] Well, firstly, I don't mind if you take me seriously.
[6:49] I'm here just to draw attention to a few ideas.
[6:52] I just want to have a little bit of a laugh.
[6:54] I'm saying there are people with alternative ideas that are far better qualified than I am
[6:58] and far better qualified, more importantly, than the people that are currently doing that
[7:02] job because they're not attempting to solve these problems.
[7:05] They're not.
[7:05] They're attempting to placate the population.
[7:08] The measures that are currently being taken around climate change are indifferent, will
[7:11] not solve the problem.
[7:13] It's possible as human beings they're simply overwhelmed by the scale of the problem.
[7:18] Not really.
[7:18] Well, possibly.
[7:19] It might be that.
[7:19] I mean, but that's sort of just semantics, really.
[7:21] Whether they're overwhelmed by it or tacitly maintaining it because of habitual life.
[7:25] I mean, mate, this is what I noticed when I was in the House of Parliament.
[7:29] It's decorated exactly the same as Eton.
[7:31] It's decorated exactly the same as Oxford.
[7:32] So a certain type of people goes in there and thinks, oh, this makes me nervous.
[7:35] And another type of people go and they go, this is how it should be.
[7:38] And I think that's got to change now.
[7:40] We can no longer have erroneous, duplicitous systems held in place unless it's for the
[7:45] only systems that serve the planet and serve the population of the planet can be allowed
[7:49] to survive.
[7:50] Not ones that serve elites, be they political or corporate elites.
[7:53] And this is what's currently happening.
[7:55] You don't really believe that.
[7:56] I completely believe it.
[7:57] Don't look at me all weary like you're at a fireside with a pipe in your beard.
[8:01] Ed Miliband, wasn't he?
[8:03] Well, he went to the same primary school as Boris O, didn't he?
[8:06] He did, but he then went to a comprehensive school in North London.
[8:08] Well, that's very good.
[8:09] That's all well and good.
[8:11] But what I'm saying is that within the existing paradigm, the change is not dramatic enough,
[8:14] not radical enough.
[8:15] So you can well understand public disturbances and public dissatisfaction when there are not
[8:20] genuine changes and genuine alternatives being offered.
[8:22] I say when there is a genuine alternative, a genuine option, then vote for that.
[8:26] But until then, don't bother.
[8:28] Why pretend?
[8:30] Why be complicit in this ridiculous illusion?
[8:33] Because by the time somebody comes along, you might think it worth voting for.
[8:37] It may be too late.
[8:38] I don't think so, because the time is now.
[8:40] These movements are already occurring.
[8:41] It's happening everywhere.
[8:42] We're in a time where communication is instantaneous and there are communities all over the world.
[8:46] The Occupy movement made a difference, even if only in that it introduced to the popular
[8:51] public lexicon the idea of the 1% versus the 99%.
[8:55] People for the first time in a generation are aware of massive corporate and economic exploitation.
[9:01] These things are not nonsense and these subjects are not being addressed.
[9:05] No one's doing anything about tax havens.
[9:07] No one's doing anything about their political affiliations and financial affiliations of the
[9:11] Conservative Party.
[9:12] So until people start addressing things that are actually real, why wouldn't I be facetious?
[9:17] Why would I take it seriously?
[9:19] Why would I encourage a constituency of young people that are absolutely indifferent to vote?
[9:23] Why would we?
[9:24] Aren't you bored?
[9:25] Aren't you more bored than anyone?
[9:26] Ain't you been talking to them year after year, listening to their lies, their nonsense?
[9:30] Then it's this one gets in, then it's that one get in.
[9:32] But the problem continues.
[9:33] Why are we going to continue to contribute to this facade?
[9:37] I'm surprised you can be facetious when you're that angry about it.
[9:40] Yeah, I'm angry. I am angry.
[9:43] Because for me, it's real.
[9:44] Because for me, it's not just some peripheral thing that I turn up once in a while to a church
[9:48] faith for.
[9:48] For me, this is what I come from.
[9:50] This is what I care about.
[9:53] Do you see any hope?
[9:54] Remember that? Yeah, totally.
[9:55] There's going to be a revolution.
[9:56] It's totally going to happen.
[9:58] I ain't got a flicker of doubt.
[10:00] This is the end.
[10:02] This is time to wake up.
[10:03] I remember I see you in that programme where you look at your ancestors and you saw that
[10:07] why your grandmother had to brass herself or got fucked over by the aristocrats who ran
[10:12] her gaff.
[10:13] You cried because you knew that it was unfair and unjust.
[10:16] And that was what was that a century ago.
[10:18] That's happening to people now.
[10:19] I just come from a woman who's being treated like that.
[10:21] I've just been talking to a woman today who's being treated like that.
[10:24] So if we can engage that feeling, instead of some moment of lachrymose sentimentality
[10:29] trotted out on the TV for people to pour over emotional porn, if we can engage that feeling
[10:34] and change things, why wouldn't we?
[10:36] Why is that naive?
[10:38] Why is that not my right because I'm an actor?
[10:40] I mean, I've taken the right.
[10:42] I don't need the right from you.
[10:43] I don't need the right from anybody.
[10:45] I'm taking it.