Try Free

Panel: Is Trump's optimism justified in the Iran negotiations?

April 15, 2026 11m 2,440 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Panel: Is Trump's optimism justified in the Iran negotiations?, published April 15, 2026. The transcript contains 2,440 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Tonight, could talks between the U.S. and Iran be starting back up again? President Trump teased that very possibility today, telling the New York Post to stay in Pakistan because, quote, something could be happening over the next two days. If talks continue later this week, sources tell CNN that..."

[0:00] Tonight, could talks between the U.S. and Iran be starting back up again? [0:04] President Trump teased that very possibility today, [0:07] telling the New York Post to stay in Pakistan because, quote, [0:11] something could be happening over the next two days. [0:14] If talks continue later this week, sources tell CNN that Vice President J.D. Vance [0:19] will once again lead those negotiations. [0:21] There's a lot of, of course, mistrust between Iran and the United States of America. [0:25] You're not going to solve that problem overnight. [0:27] But I feel very good about where we are. [0:32] So a lot of optimism from the president and his vice president. [0:36] But, Peter, it's not the first time that we've heard them express optimism about a negotiation [0:41] when maybe that was a little bit too on the bright side. [0:47] The gaps that they have to kind of bridge between Iran and the U.S. are still pretty large. [0:53] President Trump told the New York Post that he was not pleased with reports that the U.S. [0:58] had asked Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment for at least two decades during the last weekend's [1:04] unsuccessful talks. [1:05] I've been saying they can't have nuclear weapons, so I don't like the 20 years. [1:10] Understandable. [1:11] But Iran is at five years. [1:13] So even getting to 20 years seems hard to do. [1:17] Getting to never, ever, ever seems even harder. [1:21] And that's something that Donald Trump, throughout negotiations, has been very good at, is throwing [1:26] something on the table and then removing it. [1:28] Traditionally, in a negotiation, you put it on the table. [1:30] If it's on the table, great. [1:31] It's up for discussion. [1:32] It's kind of a sacrosanct thing. [1:33] That is not his approach. [1:36] Where we are right now, and I think this is where you see the naval blockade that the [1:40] U.S. has started to enforce against Iranian ships that have left port in Iran or that [1:45] are going to ports in Iran, forcing them to turn back, forcing them to not continue on [1:51] their journey, denying the Iranians that oil revenue. [1:54] That is ratcheting up the pressure against the regime to an inordinate amount. [1:59] And where we are right now, frankly, I feel good about. [2:01] Do you have any reason to feel good about it? [2:06] Meaning, like, any indications that we're actually close to a deal other than the president [2:10] saying two days? [2:11] We don't know, except for, like, minor leaks, what has come out of the Islamabad talks and [2:16] what the consequences have been when the Iranian delegation returned to Tehran and their [2:20] conversations, right? [2:21] We're relying on leaks there. [2:23] But the reality is that the screws are being tightened to an inordinate degree against that [2:27] regime at the moment. [2:29] If I were in their shoes and looking around at all my options, you don't have any. [2:35] So the question between five years and 20 years and never years, going between all of [2:40] that, that is where, ultimately, at the end of the day, they need to figure out what is [2:43] in their best interest. [2:44] I thought that regime was deposed, for one. [2:46] And two, I think when we're- [2:47] I mean, the Mullah, the Ayatollah, Comedys' dad, most of us here are running a revolutioner, [2:52] guard leadership, her dad. [2:53] The fact is that we're still arguing for the same things that the JCPOA did. [2:58] No. [2:59] I mean, and- [3:00] Ballistic missiles and proxies. [3:01] Oh, actually, if you want to go back to it, we actually had a deal in place where there [3:05] was no nuclear enrichment within 20 years. [3:08] We had this conversation last night. [3:09] And we also- [3:10] Ten years, they could start emerging in 15 years. [3:11] And we also- [3:12] And we- [3:12] Correct. [3:13] Exactly. [3:13] Which we don't have right now. [3:14] And then we also had inspectors going in, being able to check, trust, and verify what [3:18] they were doing. [3:19] We don't have that right now. [3:20] Which also would have ended a year and a half ago. [3:21] But we also have something that most people don't want, which is that in order to get to [3:28] where you're talking about, which is actually destroying their entire nuclear program, we [3:33] have to put boots on the ground. [3:35] And nobody wants to say- [3:36] I don't think that's true. [3:36] Oh, that's- [3:37] First of all, first of all, let's not lie to the American people. [3:41] We actually know that their nuclear enrichment program is actually deep, deep, deep, deep, [3:45] deep. [3:46] You cannot- [3:47] If we want to secure the uranium, yes. [3:49] But- [3:49] I agree with you. [3:50] Exactly. [3:50] So let's not lie to folk and just say that we can just bomb from on- [3:54] You cannot. [3:55] You cannot destroy their entire nuclear enrichment program unless you put- [3:58] boots on the ground. [3:59] That's a fact. [4:00] That's not something we're making up. [4:02] That's not something we're just talking about on air. [4:04] If in the, you know, context of a diplomatic negotiation, say, you know what? [4:08] That highly enriched uranium we're sitting on, it is no longer beneficial for us to- [4:11] I would actually- [4:13] Bakhari, we have boots on the water right now. [4:17] I mean, it's, you know, let's not- [4:19] There's a ship in between. [4:20] Well, yes, I know there's a ship in between, but that ship can easily be targeted by Iranians [4:24] and they would be toast. [4:26] So we have American lives. [4:28] You're telling me that you don't think- [4:29] We've also lost American lives. [4:30] We've lost American lives and we have American lives at risk there right now, so let's not [4:34] pretend we don't. [4:35] No. [4:36] I'm not going to dispute that. [4:37] You're absolutely right. [4:38] And there are realistically going to be boots on the ground. [4:39] We have boots on the boat. [4:40] That's a funny expression. [4:41] Why is that realistically, though? [4:42] Why is it realistic? [4:43] I'm agreeing with you. [4:44] Because I feel- [4:45] I've heard a lot of reasons why people are really against what Trump has done, but I'm [4:48] also not really hearing a rational response why we should let Iran just be. [4:52] To pretend that this war was completely unnecessary and pretending that Iran is not a threat and [4:56] pretending it's normal that they swear in their president and Ayatollah screaming death [5:00] to America and pretending that enrichment is not a problem, whether it's short-term or [5:04] long-term, when a regime literally hates Western values, when a regime taxed our allies, I [5:08] also think it's being ignorant. [5:10] Now, I don't want to copy what Europe is doing, where they want to mortgage their future for [5:14] 10 years of comfortability at the expense of a long-term problem. [5:17] So I appreciate the fact that maybe it's short-term pain for a longer-term solution. [5:21] Is it ideal? [5:22] No, no, no. [5:23] No. [5:24] What's the pain? [5:25] Because I heard the talking points, and they're great. [5:26] And I actually agree with some of you, some of what you said. [5:29] Because listen, I don't want a nuclear-enriched Iran. [5:33] I don't think Iran deserves to have a nuclear weapon. [5:35] I think they've sponsored terror for 40 years. [5:38] I think they want to destroy America. [5:39] I think they want to destroy Israel. [5:40] I agree with all of those points, but I'm not- the short-term pain thing, you just can't [5:46] leap over that. [5:47] Well, I think that defined that for me as we go forward, because- [5:51] Short-term pain. [5:52] We're paying more for everything. [5:53] I'm not going to sit here and deny that gas is not going to go up and groceries are unaffordable. [5:57] I'm not going to be ignorant. [5:58] But I also feel like if we don't do it now, I'm 24, it's going to bite me in the ass down [6:03] the road at some point. [6:04] I don't trust in Iran. [6:06] I don't like that they're sponsoring terrorism. [6:08] It's death to Israel, but it's death to America right after that. [6:10] But respectfully, when you were 16, we had a deal in place. [6:14] That's my point. [6:15] But I hear you're 24 now, when you were 16, we had a deal in place, and that deal is something [6:21] that actually prevented them more so then from having a nuclear weapon than where we [6:25] are today. [6:26] And what I will add to is that it took 20 months to negotiate the JCPOA, and then we [6:33] also look at the Iraq-Iran war that lasted eight years. [6:37] I think the Iranian regime feels like they actually have the upper hand because it's in Trump's [6:41] best interest to wrap this up because he knows that the American people are not on board with [6:45] this war. [6:46] They're not on board with the short-term pain, if that's what you're saying, because [6:50] I feel like there is no end in sight right now. [6:52] It's wishful thinking for him to think that he's going to be able to wrap this up. [6:56] And that's on his timeline. [6:57] But for the Iranians, I think that they actually know that they have Trump backed into a corner [7:02] right now because the American- [7:03] Oh, I totally disagree. [7:04] I think they have one part. [7:05] Let me just say one more. [7:06] I also think it's wishful thinking to think that there's not going to be a regime there [7:13] that is going to be anti-Western and be screaming death to America. [7:17] But at least have them be afraid of America. [7:19] Well, they're not afraid. [7:20] They're not. [7:21] Oh, I promise you. [7:22] They are fundamentalists. [7:23] They don't like where they are at right now. [7:24] Listen, you know, what people don't understand is that these fundamentalists over there who have [7:29] not been deposed, who have not changed. [7:32] It's like with gray hairs. [7:33] You're 24. [7:34] You don't have any. [7:35] You pluck one out. [7:36] Three more come out. [7:37] Just a little bit. [7:38] I agree. [7:39] You can kill the person. [7:40] You can't kill the ideology. [7:41] Look, there have been no regime change. [7:43] To Sarah's point, getting a long-term deal, a permanent deal with Iran on their nuclear [7:48] capabilities, on their ballistic missiles, on their funding of terror proxies is probably [7:54] not going to happen in six days. [7:56] No. [7:57] I mean, is that realistic? [7:58] I think it's going to be, initially, there can be signals of what is on the table and [8:03] what remains to be negotiated. [8:05] And on the Iranian side of the house, committing to having free and open trade through the Strait [8:09] of Hormuz. [8:10] Now, on the U.S. side of the house, we still have sanctions that we're enforcing against [8:13] the Iranians. [8:14] So that's a point of contention. [8:15] So in other words, not a grand bargain. [8:17] Not the deal. [8:18] You're not going to get a grand bargain in a week. [8:20] I'm telling you, this is what J.D. Vance says, that Trump wants a grand bargain. [8:26] I don't think that they're being transparent with the American people about when that could [8:30] feasibly happen, if it can happen at all. [8:33] I mean, it's just like, if we're going to do this, why can't you calculate just what happens [8:39] in the Strait of Hormuz? [8:40] Why can't you calculate or understand what insurance companies are going to do in response [8:44] to that? [8:45] Like, we have been caught off guard every single step of the way. [8:49] You're shaking your head no. [8:50] I'm shaking my head no. [8:51] Why? [8:52] Tell me. [8:53] Explain to me. [8:54] Because if there's any industry that Donald Trump would not have a very comprehensive [8:59] and competent understanding of within his administration. [9:01] I mean, what was the whole, you know, oh, Donald Trump is a sucker for the oil industry. [9:06] Oh, my God. [9:07] He's got so many oil executives in there. [9:08] But oil... [9:09] I guess I should know... [9:10] But first of all, the Strait of Hormuz... [9:11] I should know, Peter, that Trump did say that he didn't expect them to raise the Strait [9:16] of Hormuz. [9:17] Correct. [9:18] Not only that... [9:19] Because it was cutting off their nose despite their... [9:20] I'm just saying, I'm just telling you what he said. [9:23] He did say that. [9:24] Exactly. [9:25] But the Strait of Hormuz... [9:26] Which did not happen. [9:27] It delivers 25% of the world's oil. [9:28] And right now, oil prices in the country, in the United States of America, are up 50%. [9:32] Like, we're not actually out here saying that Donald Trump is some magical genius. [9:37] What we're saying is that he failed. [9:39] Like, they failed. [9:40] I want to go back to what we were speaking about earlier because I wanted to ask you, [9:42] well, what's your alternative? [9:43] And both of you seem that a deal is tangible. [9:45] And I really want to ask you... [9:46] Oh, I got my alternative. [9:47] Do you think there's good faith negotiations with the Islamic Republic of Europe? [9:51] Absolutely not. [9:52] I have a deal. [9:53] I know what we're going to do. [9:54] The JCPOA. [9:55] The JCPOA. [9:56] We did it already. [9:57] Can we go to commercial? [9:58] No. [9:59] Like, they were further away. [10:00] It didn't stop them from killing on American soldiers throughout the region. [10:02] It didn't stop them from building ballistic missiles. [10:04] First of all... [10:05] Yeah, I feel like that's a symptom of a bigger problem. [10:06] Our European NATO ally. [10:07] We have no problem. [10:08] First of all, we have no allies left. [10:10] Did you see the Italian Prime Minister today? [10:12] We have NATO treaty allies left right now. [10:13] Did you see the Italian Prime Minister basically taking that you're from a BS? [10:16] I would love to think about NATO. [10:17] Prime Minister Maloney, I love her. [10:18] Wait, one second. [10:19] And not only that, but you actually asked our allies to help you in the Strait of Hormuz. [10:23] And you know what they told you? [10:24] Ask them to look out for their own self-interest. [10:26] Exactly, because they would rather be comfortable for 10 more years than actually bet on their [10:29] future. [10:30] Nobody wants to be comfortable with Iran. [10:31] What people want is competency and consistency. [10:33] They have suicidal empathy. [10:34] I will add, too, to your question that you posed to me. [10:36] Suicidal empathy. [10:37] I would like to see him negotiate a better deal than the JCPOA. [10:40] I'm not saying that that deal was perfect. [10:41] By no means was it perfect. [10:42] Correct. [10:43] But there are other things that we could gain in negotiations with them. [10:46] I just worry about his ability to negotiate and get a better deal. [10:50] So we don't have changes to an interview, but I can't leave now, I can't do it when they [10:51] do yet. [10:52] But again, still makes it easy now and probably just a bad one that's clean and stab it because [10:53] we're pleased if we don't have any discussion of water. [10:54] So that is what is happening. [10:55] Let's go run here. [10:56] We're very simple. [10:57] Let's grow this for sure. [10:58] You can't agree with the Tourism Playland. [10:59] You know, I will be able to ever do well and try to condemn us or we can find a better [11:00] deal.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →