About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Mazzucato on Iran war & the global economy: Who's really benefiting? — UpFront, published April 19, 2026. The transcript contains 4,571 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"the world is reckoning with the biggest oil supply disruption in history one that has sent energy prices soaring rattled stock markets and exposed the deep vulnerabilities of economies still hooked on fossil fuels but will these crises fuel a change in global economic structures this week on up..."
[0:00] the world is reckoning with the biggest oil supply disruption in history one that has sent
[0:05] energy prices soaring rattled stock markets and exposed the deep vulnerabilities of economies
[0:11] still hooked on fossil fuels but will these crises fuel a change in global economic structures
[0:18] this week on up front i'll ask one of the world's most influential economic thinkers
[0:23] the founding director of university college london's institute for innovation and purpose
[0:28] mariana mazucato mariana mazucato thank you for joining us on up front thank you so much very
[0:40] happy to be here so since the war on iran began we've seen oil prices averaging above 100 us dollars
[0:46] a barrel last month global markets are rattled the cost of borrowing has gone up for governments
[0:52] everywhere but let's talk about everyday people if somebody's trying to fill up their tank in
[0:57] cleveland or pay electricity in london buy fuel in nairobi what are they going through at this moment
[1:03] sure well what we see by the way with the iran war is what we also saw with kovid
[1:07] when you'll remember that the supply chains globally were affected what we saw already with the ukraine
[1:12] war but even six months before the war in ukraine we had a huge energy shock and you know gas prices
[1:18] were rising and what's interesting is that not every country is affected in the same way it's those
[1:23] countries who have actually invested in having a more diversified uh a supply of energy that are
[1:30] actually more resilient so this question you're asking the answer is not the same in every country
[1:35] look at spain spain has actually taken for years now uh very um active proactive uh stances on how
[1:42] to diversify their energy so they're not over reliant on these very fossil fuels that now are stuck
[1:48] at the strait but also the question is who's benefiting you know some are hurting most people are hurting
[1:53] those who have to pay these higher prices of course to fill their uh cars however uh you know
[1:59] the top one percent is benefiting from what's happening globally so even in 2022 when we had
[2:07] a very large energy shock the largest of fossil fuel companies in the u.s made 400 billion dollars of
[2:13] which one the the top one percent actually benefited from that because of how finance is structured
[2:19] because you'll remember that you know for every company there's shareholders so who owns the shares
[2:23] in these companies who's benefiting and who's hurting and that question should always be asked otherwise
[2:29] we're acting as though we're all in it together but it's not true every time there's a price change
[2:34] right anytime there's volatility uh in prices of any of these commodities lots of money is being made
[2:41] in fact i read a very staggering statistic from the guardian that the top 100 oil and gas companies
[2:47] actually profited about what 30 million u.s dollars per hour uh since this war in in the month of this
[2:55] war yes and and also every time trump makes an announcement the question is who might have had
[3:00] some insider information about those announcements just before because there's lots of trades happening
[3:05] every time social media posts are going out okay we'll talk a little bit more about that but let's
[3:10] just talk about the international energy agency calls this the largest oil supply disruption in history
[3:16] and oxford economics warns that this could be one of the worst global economic downturns in 40 years
[3:23] and the united nations is actually warning that 32 million people could be pushed into poverty so
[3:29] the impact of this war has been absolutely devastating is this a temporary shock or are we seeing the
[3:35] reshaping of the global economy well again i mean this war is absolutely terrible both in terms of the
[3:42] fact that it didn't have to happen but also its effects but we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that it
[3:47] also has happened in a period where there's lots of really other bad things happening i mean two
[3:52] billion people in the world still don't have access to safe drinking water that's insane in the 21st
[3:58] century 1 000 children under the age of five die every single day due to that unsafe drinking water
[4:05] and in fact we're here today in washington dc where yesterday ajay bang at the world bank talked about
[4:11] the world bank's own mission around water to make it safer they also have a mission 300 to get 400
[4:17] million people in africa to have electricity that currently don't have electricity but the question
[4:22] is how we do these things if we continue to think that policy is just about doing good for people
[4:28] without changing the underlying economics so as an economist i'm really focusing a lot on the
[4:33] problematic relationship we've had with kind of defunct i would call it economic theory that has informed
[4:40] inertial policies right if we think that the role of the state is just to fix market failures to put bandages
[4:45] here and there instead of to actively shape a different type of economy that's good for people
[4:50] and planet by design we will always be on the back foot you can't have you know during covid vaccine
[4:57] nationalism because we're all affected together you can't have a climate uh nationalism water nationalism
[5:04] biodiversity nationalism this artemis you know uh uh these astronauts who took those amazing pictures
[5:10] of earth you know from the moon that was extraordinary and if you heard what they said you
[5:15] know that that we're all one humanity that sounds great and it gave me you know shivers when they said
[5:21] it but that's not how we're acting right now and and it was such a i mean it's it's interesting in this
[5:27] moment where there's you know geopolitical tensions uh to a degree that we haven't had for a very long time
[5:33] since the cold war where we have mass suffering in terms of inequality again water climate uh um the symptoms of
[5:41] climate change that we have globally it's not true that we're acting as one you know and that would
[5:46] have been such a great call to action right now to not only stop the war but to really reflect our
[5:51] solutions in a global way you mentioned the world bank you are here in washington for the world bank imf
[5:57] spring meetings you just presented a paper and you actually see this that the world bank has failed
[6:03] in its uh mission what's your core message then to these multilateral institutions and what can they
[6:09] change now what do they need to do so the world bank i think failed in the past as did the imf because
[6:15] for example when they provided loans to developing countries these were loans that were conditional
[6:20] on certain types of structural reforms but also reductions in the deficit as though that was just
[6:26] this number that had to fall as opposed to here's loans that will help you invest that will help you
[6:31] spend that will help you strengthen your health systems your infrastructure your innovation policy that
[6:37] should be targeted to actually solve you know problems on the ground and i do think however
[6:41] now the world bank is on a different trajectory the current president uh ajay banga is trying not to
[6:47] transform it and they have for example some very ambitious policies which i think are progress they're
[6:52] not failing we shouldn't just judge you know the bank as though it's you know good or bad they're trying to
[6:58] transform it but what i've been saying is that for example with their mission 300 again you know electrifying
[7:03] actually not 400 million people in africa unless that's underpinned with a different way to think
[7:09] about finance so that it's not a financial gap as though there's a hole that you just have to throw
[7:14] money into but that we really think about the structure of finance so we need more patient long-term
[7:19] finance so what public banks should be doing when they provide loans to companies is making sure that
[7:24] the benefits the profits that are then generated are reinvested back into the economy and not extracted out
[7:31] into just the financial sector so what we actually need is for the world bank to really rethink the
[7:36] whole ecosystem or help to rethink the ecosystem of these multilateral development banks and the
[7:42] national banks to work together so that the sum is bigger than the parts otherwise you just have this
[7:48] kind of project funding it sounds good a water project here a climate project there an infrastructure
[7:53] project but we're not actually seeing transformation we're not really reducing any quality we're not
[7:58] getting more resilient energy supply chains so as soon as we have an energy shock a country that's
[8:03] over reliant on one form of energy will you know sink faster and so that idea of really starting with
[8:10] the question what's to be done and then making sure the finance is structured to help make that happen
[8:15] that's about outcomes oriented finance and i wrote a book recently called mission economy a moonshot guide to
[8:21] changing capitalism where i talk about what a mission oriented financial structure would look like
[8:27] but that requires in the first instance a very different public private relationship and i i often
[8:33] joke that biologists are more rigorous than economists when we talk about partnership you know partnerships
[8:40] can be bad partnerships and biologists look at ecosystems and they don't just use it as like a neutral
[8:46] you know normative word they will differentiate whether an ecosystem is predatory parasitic symbiotic mutualistic
[8:54] and what we need in the global order but also at the national level you know i'm from italy you're
[9:00] from south africa and i'm sure we can both reflect our own countries that the relationship between the
[9:05] state and business is often parasitic we socialize risks privatize rewards there's not enough conditionality
[9:12] on businesses not only to reinvest the profits as i said but to treat workers better improve working
[9:18] conditions use um you know energy efficient supply chains instead of just money passing from one
[9:25] hand to another so we are living in this era of austerity and we know that the trump administration
[9:30] has been withdrawing from multilateral institutions including those that are at the forefront of saving
[9:35] lives like the world health organization and then you also have uh european governments that are under
[9:41] pressure to slash to slash expenditure at the same time and you touched on this when you talked about
[9:46] the cost of servicing debt for global south countries that that inequality there so that has resulted in
[9:53] erosion of faith across the global south erosion of faith in multilateral institutions like the world
[9:59] bank and the imf you said that the world bank hasn't completely failed and you mentioned a couple of
[10:04] things that ought to be done are decision makers listening so first of all you know it's not just the
[10:11] the problem with the world bank it is again how we have structured our national policies right governments
[10:19] nationally have failed to deliver for their own people there's no point in just showing up in places
[10:24] like davos at the world economic forum or this week at the spring meetings or at the cop conferences where
[10:30] they discuss climate solutions if then we don't practice what we preach right so i'm very interested in
[10:36] local policies as well and to show how we can actually then scale better solutions so for example
[10:42] if we're interested in hunger and the issues around hunger or climate or you know life below water in
[10:48] terms of what's happening inside our oceans this great documentary just made by david attenborough
[10:53] who just shows all these animals you know choking on the plastic that we're throwing into our seas
[10:58] unless we actually show that we can structure our own governments and our own businesses in a different way
[11:04] and create as i mentioned before a mission-oriented partnership then why should people believe you
[11:09] know why should they have trust in their governments and this is what we see globally many people resorting
[11:14] unfortunately to voting uh for certain parties that then just you know have a quick if you want
[11:21] answer oh blame the immigrants or blame you know exactly whether it was brexit whether it's blaming
[11:27] immigrants in different parts of the world whether it's often blaming those who ultimately are the most
[11:32] vulnerable i mean this is the irony that we're blaming those who actually have been suffering the
[11:37] most as opposed to the underlying structures that are causing these problems so i'm interested in
[11:42] things like you know uh i'm an arsenal supporter and i hope that arsenal wins i am too okay let's not
[11:49] actually go there we'll start you know going off on tangents but arsenal will win the premier league and
[11:54] maybe even the champion anyway so but i was going to mention marcus rashford who played for manchester united
[12:00] now he's playing for barcelona um and he did something so important during covet he said i would
[12:06] never have become a footballer had i not had a free school meal right so just imagine that if now during
[12:14] the world cup we had all the footballers in the world saying we need to actually invest in our welfare
[12:20] policy so everyone can flourish and we or i would not have become a footballer had i not had access to
[12:26] to breakfast at school and lunch at school and what does that mean right for actually then saying
[12:31] okay let's make sure that every child in a country especially but not only in global south countries he
[12:36] was talking about one of the richest countries in the world in the united kingdom where there is by the
[12:41] way so much inequality there's starvation in many parts of the united kingdom so imagine if we actually
[12:46] had policies that meant something for people you know that every child has access to healthy tasty so they
[12:53] actually eat it and sustainable school lunch sustainable very important so that these climate
[12:58] strategies aren't just you know blah blah blah but they're grounded in the everyday which then would
[13:02] require governments to work in that kind of situation room kind of way that we only do with wars but we
[13:08] should normalize that department of health department of agriculture department of environment
[13:13] department of economy working together to deliver a policy that matters to people that they can actually say
[13:20] yes or no did they receive it you know the reason i wrote mission economy is that to go to the moon
[13:26] and back in a short amount of time which is the apollo mission the first thing they did was have to
[13:31] change how government works they changed procurement from being just cost plus which is always a race to
[13:36] the bottom you know ketchup is a vegetable is what reagan said in order to reduce the cost of school meals
[13:43] right instead of what i just said before they change procurement to be mission oriented outcomes oriented to
[13:49] find solutions to what the astronauts found themselves requiring better ways to go to the bathroom in the
[13:54] lunar module what would they eat what would they wear and solutions to those problems happen through
[13:59] public-private partnerships which got us camera phones foil blankets baby formula home insulation software
[14:06] so we shouldn't believe the hype the trump and the elon musk hype where they said empathy is for wimps
[14:12] we should start with the goals that will actually help solve problems on the ground and find solutions
[14:20] to those problems through innovation through investment through industrial strategies that are grounded on
[14:26] good public-private partnerships and what's interesting is if we do it well growth follows growth isn't the
[14:32] mission growth is the outcome if we can stimulate investment and i say this in an era in capitalism
[14:38] where the the the profit share of global income is at a very high level but the investment share isn't
[14:45] so the labor share is low the profit share is high but these profits are not being invested they're not
[14:51] actually being used for innovation for investment for finding solutions on the ground so this requires
[14:56] active and ambitious governments nationally but also with our multilateral organizations to stop just
[15:03] talking in this abstract way and to really find solutions that matter maybe people will start to trust
[15:07] governments again so let's just talk about how the world is reorganizing itself as a result of this
[15:13] war during this war iran has been using the strait of hummus as leverage in fact they've introduced
[15:20] a toll booths for select vessels and reportedly charged transit fees not in u.s dollars but in chinese yuan
[15:28] we've seen countries uh scrambling to cut a deal with iran to negotiate directly with iran so my question is
[15:36] is this crisis accelerating a shift away from dollar dominance so i actually wrote a piece last
[15:43] september in foreign affairs about this that the brics countries so brazil russia india china south africa
[15:50] and other countries that have joined that coalition are actually starting to present a very different
[15:55] type of model take russia out of the picture just for a minute but definitely brazil and south africa for
[15:59] example when they currently hosted both the g20 uh but also the cop in brazil the the language this idea
[16:07] of a coalition of the willing right and we also see this now with spain with president sanchez talking
[16:12] in a very different way about the war and why it shouldn't have happened in the first place about
[16:16] national austerity plants that do not help people it actually costs more to the state to pick up the
[16:22] pieces afterwards uh because of you know health costs when people aren't actually being taken care
[16:27] of at source for example um he also took a very important stance on gaza so there is there are
[16:34] different leaders out there that are not just talking to camera but are trying to also collaborate
[16:41] and find coalitions together and actually this weekend uh president sanchez is hosting a global
[16:47] progressive mobilization i'll be flying out tonight to go to spain for that and we see president lula
[16:53] from brazil president sanchez in spain mia motley who i think is one of the most ambitious leaders in
[16:59] the world the prime minister of barbados meeting to really create a different narrative framing i would
[17:05] argue theory that's what we also need from the economists a different theory of how the economy works
[17:09] but also very different practice and doing it together and unless we have a coalition of the willing
[17:15] then we will still you know at best have leaders you know talking the good talk but we won't show
[17:20] that we can do things differently so this kind of predatory way of uh doing business is just off but
[17:27] i think it speaks then to your new book that is coming up later in the year you focus you've talked
[17:31] about a mission focused yeah mission oriented uh business uh but the book is called the common good
[17:37] economy a new campus it's an interesting phrase common good it conjures up benevolence shared humanity
[17:45] but it can mean different things to different exactly how do you define it economically and ensure
[17:50] that it is not captured by the exactly so well the reason i've written the book which is coming out
[17:55] in june in the uk in the us in um september and it's coming out in many different languages
[18:01] um is precisely what you just said it's so easy to talk about good but are we actually delivering it
[18:07] and the answer is no we're in fact going backwards in most of the sustainable development goals and we
[18:11] know from our own countries and equality is rising and so on and so how do we actually create a
[18:16] framework that holds ourselves accountable when we talk about good and the book begins by criticizing
[18:21] how economists talk about good when we talk about the public good it sounds good two words one of
[18:26] which is good it's just a correction for something the private sector is not doing um so this idea
[18:31] that we're just fixing market failures and when it's an area that we would like the private sector to be
[18:37] investing in but they don't we expect government to fill the gap and so i begin by saying the common
[18:42] good is not a correction it's an objective like a moonshot however what really matters is the how we
[18:49] reach it so the how we work together how capital and labor work together how public and private how
[18:56] public and citizens matters as much as what we're trying to do and so i lean more in political philosophy
[19:01] so aristotle for example talked about the telos the goal and the police not the police the police
[19:07] the community right so how do we actually form community how do we really start looking at all
[19:12] contracts so the common good economy i break the compass down into five elements the first is purpose
[19:18] and directionality let's really talk about what we're trying to do on the ground like the school meal
[19:22] example second co-creation what these missions are need to be outcomes of a participatory discussion
[19:29] for the moon landing it didn't really matter if it was technocratic but for these earthly missions
[19:33] we really need participation of people who are most affected also by the policies and i used to
[19:39] talk quite a bit with pope francis and he wrote in his encyclicals and the laudato si that the common
[19:45] good had to be based on the preferential option for the poor which comes from catholic social thought
[19:53] which means to make sure that every policy is judged by how it will affect the most vulnerable the
[19:59] most but also the principle of subsidiarity which meant it has to be also designed at a very local
[20:05] level third sharing knowledge fourth sharing rewards so we stopped doing what we did in silicon valley
[20:11] where everything in your iphone was publicly financed internet gps touch screen siri and yet the
[20:17] benefits we know where they've gone to these very large trillion dollar earning companies on the back of
[20:24] public investment and the fifth transparency and accountability again think of our own countries
[20:29] where there's lots of lack of transparency and this is also a key reason why people lose faith in what's
[20:35] happening because you don't even know who owns what and why who's doing what and why we talked about
[20:39] this earlier about who's benefiting the most from this war the top 100 oil and gas companies money that's
[20:45] leaving the pockets of ordinary citizens into these shareholders but i wonder whether this knowledge that
[20:50] this war has been lucrative for some the tech uh architecture lucrative for some you actually wrote
[20:56] then that this energy crisis shows us that it's time for a new green industrial strategy yeah tell us
[21:03] about that sure and you know i actually talk about green growth because industrial strategy ultimately you
[21:07] know we're talking about capitalism right so industry matters business matters how do you get business
[21:13] also to rethink its own governance when i talked about this this huge amount of money that's just going to
[21:19] buying back shares that's due to a corporate governance strategy which is maximizing shareholder value
[21:25] so what does it mean to maximize stakeholder value the value that that is both created by a much wider
[21:31] group of people including labor including indigenous communities for example in the amazon that have
[21:36] huge amounts of knowledge about how to preserve biodiversity but their own knowledge is not being brought to
[21:41] the table in uh you know the design for example of the amazon fund which sounds great but who has actually
[21:48] both created it and who's benefiting we need to have much more as i said participatory structures
[21:53] but the idea of having green growth and by the way it's not because i think we need green growth it's
[21:57] the planet just you know like we are expanding what they call the planetary boundaries um and the the issue
[22:05] is what does it mean to also just go beyond talking about energy but to really talk about you know green
[22:11] cement green steel uh different transport structures so it's not about transport but sustainable mobility
[22:17] how do we bring these goals to the center of an industrial strategy which ultimately will catalyze
[22:22] business investment and what is growth but a function of investment so we're solving both a climate
[22:28] issue but also fostering growth and this is why i often argue to politicians don't talk about growth
[22:34] talk about the problems and make sure you use your industrial strategy to foster solutions to those
[22:39] problems and lo and behold growth follows as long as the solutions are driven by innovation last last
[22:45] question we've spoken about the iran war energy crisis market shocks and all of that and you are
[22:51] talking about a mission oriented approach do these crises make it harder to implement that mission
[22:58] oriented approach no i think the crises interestingly uh bring the urgency back and it's it's not surprising
[23:05] that we have mission oriented approaches in times of war you know again going to the moon and back in a
[23:10] short amount of time was during the cold war where the u.s was you know really at war uh well during the
[23:17] cold war with russia and there you know the whole sputnik moment also during covid where we were uh you
[23:23] know started to have again departments of health and energy uh and and and uh military and finance and
[23:30] education in the room together because they had to work together to solve the problems that the countries
[23:36] were facing so when we have periods of urgency and crisis governments often wake up but the problem
[23:41] is they then fall back asleep as we saw post covid where we no longer had the kinds of investments in
[23:46] our health services and health systems that we really should have been continuing to have in order to be
[23:51] more resilient next time around so hopefully this energy crisis will actually make governments realize
[23:59] that they have to become more resilient to not depend on fossil fuels to have that more renewable energy
[24:05] mix in their energy sources however that requires leadership and this is where again this this event
[24:11] that's happening this weekend this global progressive mobilization by those leaders who do talk about
[24:16] the need to improve public services public housing sustainability so we are breathing good air water for
[24:23] all you know this moment is very very important to allow the leaders who do care about a more progressive
[24:29] way to structure economies to have a voice together and to also build that trust back with citizens as
[24:35] as you rightly say have lost that trust mariana matsukatio thank you so much for joining us on up front thank you
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →