About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Lebanon attacks could be the 'deal-breaker' in US–Iran peace talks: Analyst, published April 9, 2026. The transcript contains 1,624 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Okay, let's take a closer look at who's likely to attend those negotiations in Islamabad. This is what we've learned from officials in Pakistan. Pakistan's Prime Minister, Shabazz Sharif, will host the meetings. He's going to be joined by Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, as well as Army Chief Asim..."
[0:00] Okay, let's take a closer look at who's likely to attend those negotiations in Islamabad.
[0:04] This is what we've learned from officials in Pakistan.
[0:07] Pakistan's Prime Minister, Shabazz Sharif, will host the meetings.
[0:10] He's going to be joined by Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, as well as Army Chief Asim Muneer.
[0:15] He's widely seen as the country's most powerful security figure.
[0:20] The U.S. is expected to send Vice President J.D. Vance and Jared Kushner.
[0:24] He's Donald Trump's son-in-law and a former presidential advisor.
[0:27] Also likely to attend are Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, as well as General Brad Cooper.
[0:32] He oversees U.S. military operations in the region.
[0:36] Iran's delegation will include Parliamentary Speaker Mohamed Bahar Khalibaf
[0:39] and Foreign Minister Abbasarachi, who was involved in previous nuclear talks.
[0:44] They're likely to be joined by the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council
[0:48] and the Deputy Foreign Minister.
[0:51] Moshakhin Hossein Saeed is a defence and foreign policy expert.
[0:54] He's also a veteran Pakistani politician and journalist, and he's joining us from Istanbul.
[1:00] So thank you very much indeed for being with us.
[1:02] I want to ask you about the latest lines that we've been getting with regard to Israel and Lebanon,
[1:07] the suggestion that there may be some sort of movement towards discussion,
[1:12] which may lead to a form of ceasefire in Lebanon.
[1:16] From Pakistan's point of view as mediator between the U.S. and Iran,
[1:20] how much easier or perhaps more difficult does that make Pakistan's job
[1:25] to try to work towards some sort of negotiation?
[1:30] I would say that we are talking of a comprehensive peace.
[1:35] We are not talking of a segmented or compartmentalised peace.
[1:39] And peace means peace not just with Iran, but also in Lebanon,
[1:42] which is suffering the most because of Netanyahu's bullying.
[1:47] So in that regard, Pakistan is very concerned that Netanyahu be reigned in
[1:53] because Lebanon could be a potential deal-breaker.
[1:56] Iran has taken a strong position in it,
[1:58] and there is a strong sentiment all across the Middle East
[2:01] that the Lebanese are being getting caught in the crossfire,
[2:04] and they're being bullied and browbeaten by a stronger neighbour
[2:08] who's just taking it out on them because they can't take it out on Iran.
[2:12] So Lebanon is very important,
[2:13] and I think probably Trump has pressured Netanyahu
[2:16] to start talking of peace talks with Lebanon
[2:19] on the eve of the talks in Islamabad tomorrow.
[2:23] It is worth pointing out that Benjamin Netanyahu,
[2:25] in his latest statement, has said that at the moment
[2:28] there is no ceasefire in Lebanon,
[2:29] and Israel will continue to carry on its attacks.
[2:34] Ali Hashim, our correspondent, Dehran,
[2:36] was outlining or making the point that the two sides,
[2:40] the US and Iran, seem extremely far apart still,
[2:44] and with the two individual documents that they're working towards,
[2:47] 15 points on the part of the US, 10 points on part of Iran.
[2:52] Is there, as part of the staging process, if you like,
[2:55] with regard to these negotiations,
[2:57] is one of the intentions just to get people talking
[3:00] from a single document,
[3:02] so that there is one central document
[3:04] that everybody can refer to?
[3:07] Say that the most important thing is not just
[3:10] 15 points of the US versus 10 points from the Iranian side,
[3:15] because then people can become very finicky
[3:17] on each comma and colon.
[3:19] I think we have to look at the big picture.
[3:21] Is the US and Israel really interested in peace,
[3:24] or are they seeking a peace meal arrangement
[3:27] as a breather for the next round?
[3:29] And I think that's the core concern of Iran.
[3:32] And I think the message that today we have heard from Iran
[3:35] is quite positive, I would say,
[3:37] from Mustafa Khamenei, the supreme leader,
[3:40] who has given his full support to the peace process.
[3:43] He has said that Iran will certainly participate,
[3:46] and that Iran does not want a new war,
[3:49] provided they are getting some minimum conditions
[3:52] for lasting and durable peace.
[3:54] So I think that's a very strong endorsement
[3:56] from the highest levels of the Iranian leadership,
[3:59] that they fully back this process,
[4:01] which is being sponsored by Pakistan in Islamabad.
[4:04] So the ball is now in the American and Israeli court.
[4:07] How do they want it,
[4:08] or are they just going to get bogged down
[4:10] in these points,
[4:12] or they want to look at the big picture
[4:14] and try to clinch a settlement,
[4:16] which is maybe close at hand,
[4:18] if the intentions are sincere and clear
[4:20] from Washington and Tel Aviv.
[4:23] It's been very obvious the impact that the war has had
[4:26] on the world's economy,
[4:27] and of course the economy of the Gulf nations as well,
[4:30] many of whom still have their ships
[4:32] stuck in the Strait of Hormuz.
[4:34] One would imagine that Gulf nations
[4:36] and other countries around the world
[4:38] who have been affected by this
[4:39] want to have their views heard,
[4:41] have their opinions heard during these talks.
[4:44] What role can Pakistan play, if any,
[4:47] in making sure that those considerations
[4:49] are taken under advisement
[4:52] and are at least heard within the talks?
[4:56] I think those considerations
[4:57] would also be done at two levels.
[5:00] Number one, the US itself
[5:02] is also representing some of those sentiments,
[5:05] although it's by and large
[5:06] representing only Israel,
[5:07] as it did in the war.
[5:09] And secondly, Pakistan,
[5:10] since it has good relations,
[5:12] have very close ties with GCC countries,
[5:14] they'll be doing that also.
[5:16] And don't forget that yesterday,
[5:17] for the first time,
[5:18] the Iranian foreign minister
[5:20] and the Saudi foreign minister
[5:21] had a telephone conversation,
[5:23] the first such conversation
[5:24] since the war began.
[5:25] So the channel of communications
[5:27] are opening up between Iran
[5:29] and the Gulf countries,
[5:30] and already we have seen positive vibes
[5:32] coming out from Qatar and from Oman.
[5:35] The leader, Amir of Qatar,
[5:38] had a good conversation
[5:39] with our prime minister also.
[5:41] So Pakistan is in touch
[5:42] with all these leaders,
[5:43] and Pakistan will certainly convey
[5:45] the sentiments and the perspectives
[5:47] of the Gulf countries
[5:48] who are, as you rightly said,
[5:50] in a very serious bind
[5:51] in terms of the chokehold
[5:53] on the Strait of Hormuz,
[5:55] because it's like economic
[5:56] and energy strangulation for them.
[5:59] You were referring to the relations
[6:01] that Pakistan has,
[6:03] which has put it in the position
[6:04] of being able to carry out
[6:06] these negotiations
[6:07] and act as a mediator.
[6:09] It has strong relations with the US.
[6:11] Equally, it has strong relations
[6:13] with Iran as well.
[6:14] But do you think
[6:15] that those relations
[6:16] will be enough
[6:17] to allow Pakistan
[6:18] to be able to keep the talks
[6:20] on track and focused?
[6:24] I would say that
[6:25] at some point in time,
[6:26] you will also see perhaps
[6:28] behind the scenes
[6:29] or maybe a little bit up front,
[6:31] some Chinese role also.
[6:33] Chinese pushing and prodding
[6:35] from the sidelines.
[6:37] And the China factor
[6:38] is going to be very important.
[6:39] And don't forget
[6:40] that Pakistan and China
[6:41] are coordinating very closely.
[6:43] We are on the same page.
[6:44] We gave a five-point plan also.
[6:47] And China is also looking forward
[6:48] to welcoming Trump.
[6:49] And they have told Trump,
[6:51] apparently,
[6:52] according to my information,
[6:53] that before you enter China
[6:55] on 14th and 15th of May,
[6:56] there should be some sort
[6:58] of a peace settlement
[6:59] in the war with Iran
[7:02] because they don't want
[7:03] to have talks with Trump
[7:04] at the same time
[7:05] that Trump is having war on Iran.
[7:07] So I think that China factor
[7:08] is also going to be
[7:09] a force multiplier for peace
[7:11] through Pakistan
[7:13] in this process.
[7:15] I just want to draw
[7:16] on your experience.
[7:16] I mentioned that
[7:17] you were a veteran
[7:18] Pakistani politician.
[7:19] You've also been a journalist
[7:20] and no doubt
[7:21] you have covered events
[7:22] such as this.
[7:23] What's your understanding
[7:24] of the mechanics
[7:25] of how this might work out?
[7:26] We know that
[7:27] when there were
[7:28] nuclear talks in Geneva
[7:29] that were mediated by Oman,
[7:32] it was essentially
[7:32] two teams sitting
[7:33] in separate rooms
[7:34] and the mediators
[7:35] were moving backwards
[7:36] and forwards
[7:37] between them carrying
[7:38] messages and suggestions
[7:40] and so on.
[7:40] Is that broadly
[7:42] how it is likely
[7:42] to happen in Islamabad?
[7:46] Yes.
[7:46] We have had this experience
[7:47] before also.
[7:49] As a journalist,
[7:49] I remember I was in Geneva
[7:51] in 1985, 86, 87.
[7:53] We were having these
[7:54] what is called
[7:55] proximity talks.
[7:56] It was the Kabul regime
[7:58] and it was the Soviet Union
[8:00] and Pakistan and the US side
[8:02] and they were Diego Cordavez
[8:04] and the UN were the mediators
[8:07] at that point in time
[8:08] and they were sitting
[8:09] in separate rooms
[8:10] not talking to each other,
[8:12] not meeting each other
[8:13] and communicating
[8:14] through the United Nations.
[8:16] So that same format
[8:17] will be there.
[8:18] One plus side
[8:19] in this situation
[8:20] for Pakistan's perspective
[8:21] and Pakistan's role
[8:22] is that Pakistan
[8:23] has a very good
[8:25] personal rapport
[8:26] respectively with both sides.
[8:29] For example,
[8:29] with Abbas, Arachie
[8:30] and Kale-Bakh.
[8:31] They are very close
[8:32] friends of Pakistan.
[8:33] Kale-Bakh was in Pakistan
[8:34] recently.
[8:35] I had a long chat
[8:36] with him also,
[8:36] the speaker.
[8:37] Abbas Arachie
[8:38] was also in Pakistan.
[8:39] We are good friends also.
[8:40] He was deputy
[8:41] with Jabhat Sarif
[8:42] in the nuclear negotiations.
[8:43] And Pakistan
[8:44] is also a very close
[8:45] friendly rapport
[8:46] with Jared Kushner
[8:47] and Steve Witkoff
[8:49] because they have been
[8:50] meeting on and off
[8:51] the field marshal
[8:52] as well as the prime minister
[8:53] and our deputy prime minister.
[8:55] So that also makes
[8:55] it a difference.
[8:57] We are not talking
[8:57] to strangers.
[8:58] We are talking
[8:59] to friends on both sides
[9:00] and with them
[9:01] they have a good
[9:02] personal friendly rapport.
[9:04] So that is a
[9:04] I think an additional
[9:06] plus in this
[9:07] current situation
[9:08] which is very tense
[9:09] and unpredictable
[9:10] otherwise.
[9:11] Mujahid Hussain Syed
[9:12] is defence
[9:13] and foreign policy expert
[9:14] and we appreciate
[9:15] you giving us
[9:16] your time sir.
[9:17] Thank you very much
[9:17] indeed.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →