About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Iran-US peace talks fail to reach deal as Washington issues 'final offer' — BBC News, published April 12, 2026. The transcript contains 2,443 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"U.S. and Iranian delegations meeting in Pakistan have failed to reach a deal to end the conflict in the Middle East. After talks that ran through the night, the U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance said the Iranians have not accepted what he called the U.S.'s final offer. Iranian media blamed what it..."
[0:00] U.S. and Iranian delegations meeting in Pakistan have failed to reach a deal to end the conflict
[0:06] in the Middle East. After talks that ran through the night, the U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance
[0:11] said the Iranians have not accepted what he called the U.S.'s final offer. Iranian media
[0:16] blamed what it called unreasonable demands by the U.S. Our South Asia correspondent Azadeh
[0:21] Mishiri is in Islamabad. The U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance left in the early hours of the morning
[0:28] after he said that the United States had needed a fundamental commitment from Iran not to develop
[0:35] nuclear weapons. Iran, for its part, has called the U.S. demands unreasonable. Now, what has actually
[0:43] been achieved here in Pakistan? Our correspondent Joe Inwood has this report on high-stakes talks
[0:49] that seem to have reached an impasse. After 21 hours of negotiations, the U.S. Vice President
[0:57] left without a deal. The face-to-face meeting had been historic, but may be remembered as
[1:03] a failure of diplomacy. J.D. Vance had arrived in Pakistan for talks with the Speaker of Iran's
[1:09] Parliament and Foreign Minister, trying to bring more than a month of fighting to an end.
[1:15] The press were kept well away amidst heavy security. No one was saying much.
[1:20] An intense struggle is underway on the diplomatic front. I assure our good people that we will
[1:27] use all our capacities to consolidate our country's achievements and to defend Iran's existence.
[1:35] After 40 days of fighting and nearly 50 years of hostility between the U.S. and Iran, there
[1:41] was a lot to discuss. For Iran, avoiding a repeat of the destruction of the last month was
[1:48] high up their agenda. They want guarantees it will not happen again.
[1:53] Top of the U.S. agenda is the reopening of this vital waterway, the Strait of Hormuz.
[2:00] Iran has selectively but effectively blocked it. It's given them huge leverage that they
[2:05] did not have before the war. Iran wants something very different here. International recognition
[2:11] of its rights over the strait, maybe including the ability to charge tolls to pass. Yesterday,
[2:19] the U.S. claimed two naval destroyers had got through clearing mines. Iran denied that,
[2:24] saying they'd driven the warship off.
[2:27] There are many other issues. For the U.S., nuclear weapons, Iran's ballistic missiles,
[2:34] as well as their regional proxies. While Iran wants reparations for the damage done by the
[2:39] war, the release of frozen assets, as well as an end to attacks on its allies in the region.
[2:45] And that final point looked like it could derail talks before they even began. Israel continued
[2:51] its attacks on the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, even as the delegations were meeting in Pakistan.
[2:57] The health ministry here says more than 2,000 people have now been killed. As the talks went
[3:03] into the night, this was President Trump's assessment.
[3:05] Regardless what happens, we win in that country. And so let's see what happens. Maybe they make
[3:14] a deal, maybe they don't. From the standpoint of America, we win.
[3:20] NICK SCHIFRIN, President of the United States of America, then an update. After 21 hours of talks,
[3:23] the two sides had failed to reach a deal. The U.S. said the main sticking point was nuclear weapons.
[3:29] DAVID BROOKS, U.S. Secretary of Defense, United States of America,
[3:30] We have not reached the agreement. And I think that's bad news for Iran much more than it's bad news for the United States of America.
[3:36] So we go back to the United States having not come to an agreement.
[3:40] We've made very clear what our red lines are.
[3:44] As the U.S. vice president drove to the airport, Iranian state media said negotiations broke down due to unreasonable demands.
[3:52] These talks began amidst a spiraling war and apocalyptic threats.
[3:57] If their failure leads to a return to fighting, the consequences will be felt around the world.
[4:03] Jo Inwood, BBC News.
[4:05] Well, as Joe said there, the talks went on long into the night, but also long into the early hours of the morning.
[4:13] We were all waiting for an update.
[4:15] And here's more of what J.D. Vance had to say when that finally came.
[4:18] We've been at it now for 21 hours.
[4:21] And we've had a number of substantive discussions with the Iranians.
[4:26] That's the good news.
[4:27] The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement.
[4:30] And I think that's bad news for Iran much more than it's bad news for the United States of America.
[4:34] So we go back to the United States having not come to an agreement.
[4:38] We've made very clear what our red lines are, what things we're willing to accommodate them on, and what things we're not willing to accommodate them on.
[4:45] And we've made that as clear as we possibly could.
[4:48] And they have chosen not to accept our terms.
[4:52] Questions?
[4:53] Nick Roberts of CNN.
[4:55] Well, I won't go into all the details because I don't want to negotiate in public after we've negotiated for 21 hours in private.
[5:09] But the simple fact is that we need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon,
[5:16] and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon.
[5:20] That is the core goal of the President of the United States, and that's what we've tried to achieve through these negotiations.
[5:26] Again, their nuclear programs, such as it is, the enrichment facilities that they had before, they've been destroyed.
[5:35] But the simple question is, do we see a fundamental commitment of will for the Iranians not to develop a nuclear weapon,
[5:42] not just now, not just two years from now, but for the long term?
[5:45] We haven't seen that yet.
[5:46] We hope that we will.
[5:47] Jen.
[5:48] We talked about all those issues, Jen, and we talked about a number of issues beyond that.
[6:00] And so certainly those things came up.
[6:01] But again, we just could not get to a situation where the Iranians were willing to accept our terms.
[6:09] I think that we were quite flexible.
[6:11] We were quite accommodating.
[6:11] The President told us, you need to come here in good faith and make your best effort to get a deal.
[6:18] We did that.
[6:18] And unfortunately, we weren't able to make any headway.
[6:22] Preston.
[6:22] Mr. Vice President, how often did you communicate with President Trump throughout the negotiations?
[6:27] There were reports that there were multiple rounds where there were breaks in between negotiations.
[6:32] How often did you communicate with the President throughout those rounds?
[6:35] And what was he saying as you were going through these negotiations that you said fell short?
[6:39] Yeah, obviously, we were talking to the President consistently.
[6:42] I don't know how many times we talked to him, a half dozen times, a dozen times over the past 21 hours.
[6:47] We obviously also talked to Admiral Cooper, to Pete, to Marco, to the entire national security team.
[6:52] We talked to Scott Besson a number of times.
[6:54] So, look, we were constantly in communication with the team because we were negotiating in good faith.
[6:59] And we leave here, and we leave here with a very simple proposal, a method of understanding that is our final and best offer.
[7:09] We'll see if the Iranians accept it. Thank you.
[7:13] Final and best offer there.
[7:14] Well, it was a long 21 hours since J.D. Vance had arrived, which meant that here in Islamabad,
[7:19] there was some hope that perhaps the two sides were seeing points of agreement or at least points they could work on.
[7:25] Our correspondent, Caroline Davies, our Pakistan correspondent,
[7:29] was there when J.D. Vance and the American delegation were leaving their hotel.
[7:33] Here's her take.
[7:34] The white building just behind me is the hotel where these talks were taking place.
[7:39] And in the moments after the press conference finished,
[7:42] we and other journalists ran from inside the conference centre just across the road to this point here
[7:46] to see what was happening with the U.S. delegation.
[7:48] By the time we reached this point, there was already a convoy of cars lined up down the side of the hotel,
[7:55] including Pakistan security and the security that the American vice president travels with.
[7:59] That convoy moved off fairly quickly, including an American flagged car and away,
[8:04] taking the vice president and the rest of the delegation away from the hotel and away from Islamabad.
[8:12] There was a palpable sense of disappointment in the hall when it was announced by vice president J.D. Vance
[8:18] that there was no deal between the U.S. and Iran.
[8:20] I think many people thought that it was a very long shot to try to find some form of longer lasting peace settlement
[8:28] or some form of longer lasting deal between the two sides,
[8:32] given that their publicly stated position seemed to be miles apart and there was zero trust really between the two sides.
[8:39] But the fact that both had sent such senior delegations had led some hope that there was a genuine and sincere effort
[8:46] to try to find some form of deal in the hope that they could find some form of common ground.
[8:49] But, of course, now the Americans are leaving Islamabad with no deal that has been agreed between the U.S. and Iran
[8:56] and at the moment no certainty about what becomes next.
[9:01] That was Caroline Davis there as the U.S. delegation was leaving.
[9:06] Now, there had been perhaps an expectation on the U.S. side that Iran's regime was so weakened by weeks of war
[9:13] that they would be willing to make certain concessions.
[9:17] Perhaps that perception has now changed.
[9:19] For its part, Iran has called U.S. demands unreasonable and throughout the negotiations,
[9:26] they had called on the United States to refrain from making unlawful demands, as they put it, as well as excessive ones.
[9:35] Now, amidst all of this, even before the delegations had arrived here in Islamabad,
[9:40] the leader of Iran's delegation, Mohammad Bar-Ghalibaf, the leader of Iran's parliament, the speaker of parliament,
[9:47] he had said that one of their red lines is a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon as attacks continue against Hezbollah.
[9:57] Now, he had said that was a red line, a precondition that had to be met before negotiations could even be made.
[10:03] So let's speak to Nick Beak, our correspondent in Jerusalem.
[10:09] Nick, it's good to have you.
[10:11] What does all of this mean for what's going on between Israel and Lebanon?
[10:16] Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had said that he was looking ahead to potential peace talks on Tuesday,
[10:22] but may there be a recalculation there now?
[10:27] Good morning, Azadeh.
[10:27] Well, so far, no official reaction from the Israelis.
[10:32] There's been some report in the Israeli media that they were an official source, unnamed,
[10:37] saying that they weren't surprised that these talks have ended without an agreement
[10:41] and that Israel remains ready to resume the war with Iran if needs be.
[10:47] And although that's not an official statement, I think it reflects the thinking in Israel.
[10:52] They didn't like this process in the first place,
[10:54] the fact that they saw Pakistan as not being an honest middleman in the midst of these discussions.
[11:01] Israel, of course, not invited to the negotiating table,
[11:04] even though it was shoulder to shoulder, as it saw itself, with the Americans in hitting Iran.
[11:10] So they didn't really want this process to exclude them any further.
[11:15] In terms of what happens next, you're absolutely right.
[11:18] What we've seen overnight is a continuation of what's been going over the past few days or so,
[11:23] certainly, with the IDF, the Israeli military, hitting the south of Lebanon,
[11:28] saying they're striking Hezbollah positions there,
[11:30] talking about hitting a rocket launcher that was primed and ready to go.
[11:34] Meanwhile, Lebanese media reporting that five people have been killed in southern Lebanon.
[11:38] So this dynamic continues.
[11:41] More people being killed.
[11:42] The IDF attacks continuing.
[11:44] And, Nick, we often talk about what the goals were to begin with about this war,
[11:52] but what is your sense of what Benjamin Netanyahu's goals are when it comes to this war with Iran?
[12:01] Well, he had some quite clear goals, and he hasn't tried to assert or claim that he's fulfilled all of them.
[12:08] And in a way, they chimed with what the Americans said they wanted to be doing.
[12:11] So, for a start, they wanted to put an end to the Iranian nuclear capability,
[12:16] any suggestion or any ability of the Iranians to get a nuclear weapon in the future.
[12:21] They wanted to massively degrade the ballistic weapons capability,
[12:25] and they also wanted regime change.
[12:28] Now, Mr Netanyahu has not tried to claim that those have been fulfilled,
[12:31] and certainly he's got a lot of opposition politicians here saying that he's failed in all of his aims,
[12:36] that he managed successfully to bring Mr Trump and the Americans into the war,
[12:40] but it's been ended at a time of the White House's choosing,
[12:43] and really Israel is stuck in the middle, not at the top table,
[12:46] and is not really a party to the direction of travel.
[12:49] So we'll have to see what happens next.
[12:51] But certainly he will have to recalibrate whether he intensifies attacks in Lebanon.
[12:56] It's worth pointing out, Azadeh, that, as you said right at the start,
[13:00] the Israelis have said that what's going on between them and Hezbollah,
[13:04] a group, of course, that's backed by Iran,
[13:07] what's happening there in Lebanon is completely different.
[13:10] from their strikes with the Americans on Iran.
[13:14] And, of course, Iran says that that's not the case,
[13:17] that it's fundamentally linked.
[13:19] And they've said that they will resume attacks on American interests,
[13:22] also maybe some of their Gulf state neighbours,
[13:25] if this continues, if the Israelis continue to hit Hezbollah positions in Lebanon.
[13:32] All right, Nick, thank you for that update.
[13:33] Nick Beak there.
[13:34] Now, as a reminder, these were historic peace talks,
[13:38] even if they have ended with this impasse,
[13:42] because it's the highest-level face-to-face talks we've seen
[13:45] between the United States and Iran since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
[13:50] Questions remain.
[13:52] We started with a lot of unanswered questions, and that continues.
[13:55] What does this mean for the ceasefire after six weeks of war
[13:59] that had sent oil prices soaring,
[14:02] had caused extensive damage to energy infrastructure in the region,
[14:07] and had led to thousands of deaths in the region as well.
[14:10] Today, our team is going to be continuing to monitor events here in Islamabad,
[14:15] watching for any further reaction from all parties involved,
[14:20] as we try to make sense of what has actually been achieved here
[14:23] and what could come next.
[14:26] Azadeh Mishiri for us there in Islamabad.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →