About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of How I Will Make Trump Fire Ultimate Goon: Rep — The Daily Beast Podcast from The Daily Beast, published May 3, 2026. The transcript contains 3,639 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"It's worse than incompetent. I think he's a vengeful individual who not just lacks the qualification, but has a meanness to him and a corruption of his heart and soul to him that allows him to do things to people in organizations that most normal people would not do. I think he is in extreme..."
[0:00] It's worse than incompetent. I think he's a vengeful individual who not just lacks the
[0:07] qualification, but has a meanness to him and a corruption of his heart and soul to him
[0:17] that allows him to do things to people in organizations that most normal people would
[0:23] not do. I think he is in extreme danger, which is why my focus has been getting him fired,
[0:29] basically. I would love to have him impeached. And of course, I would pursue that. But we don't have
[0:33] the votes for that. So what can we do? We can make it so untenable for him and highlight the level of
[0:40] corruption and the incompetence. I'm Joanna Coles. This is the Daily Beast podcast. And what a moment
[0:48] for Pete Hegseth when Jason Crow, the congressman from Colorado, put him under the spotlight at the
[0:56] select committee hearings yesterday. I've never seen anybody look more uncomfortable. Hegseth,
[1:01] of course, shifted uncomfortably in his seat and tried to suggest that the congressman was doing
[1:09] all sorts of jujitsu to get him to say something he didn't mean to say. But, well, he looked terrible
[1:16] and it was a terrible hearing for him. Mr. Parlatori, as your senior advisor, correct?
[1:22] He does reserve duty on behalf of the Navy. His title is senior advisor. You gave him that title,
[1:29] correct? And I would count him as very much an advisor of mine. Tim Parlatori has been a long-term
[1:33] friend. He sits in meetings with you and advises you, doesn't he? He sits in some meetings on
[1:41] occasion. Well, he maintains a desk and an office in the Pentagon. Does he not? I'd have to check.
[1:47] You don't know? It's a big Pentagon. You directly commissioned Mr. Parlatori in the Naval Reserve as a
[1:55] Navy commander in March 2025. Did you not? I was very proud to do so. And when you did,
[2:01] because he's a Navy Reserve officer, he didn't have to go through the PPO process,
[2:06] the White House Presidential Personnel Office, right? He wasn't vetted by a White House PPO.
[2:11] Uniformed service members don't get vetted by a White House PPO. The answer is yes. He didn't
[2:14] have to be vetted by a White House PPO. He didn't go through the Senate confirmation process either,
[2:19] did he? The answer is no. I don't know what you're getting to, but Tim is a fantastic man.
[2:25] I'll tell you what I'm getting to. The answer is no, right? He does great work.
[2:29] Okay. Was it true that he was accused of lying by the president's legal team?
[2:33] I'm not familiar to, you'd have to give me the, well, it's right here. You want to look at the
[2:40] statement from the president? Anybody can blow up a quote and claim it says something and that's
[2:44] what you're doing in a little stunt. Secretary Hegseth, what I'm really concerned about is you
[2:47] purport to be, have unfaltering loyalty to president Trump. And yet you are continuously
[2:52] going. Oh, you care a lot about president Trump, don't you? This is a cute waste of your five minutes,
[2:56] a huge, cute waste of your five minutes that led nowhere. I reclaim my time.
[3:01] And as we've seen, these hearings turn out to be bad for cabinet secretaries. Kristi Noem left
[3:07] shortly after hers. Pam Bondi left shortly after hers. Who knows how long Pete Hegseth is going to
[3:13] last. And this is a shorter interview than we would normally do, but we felt the urgency of the
[3:19] moment made sense for us to squeeze into the congressman's schedule. But we're going to come
[3:24] back in three weeks with a much longer interview with him. So just one more quick but important
[3:31] note. After we recorded our interview with Jason Crow, Tim Palatori sent a letter to the congressman
[3:38] denying Crow's accusations and questions in his testimony. Palatori also offered a statement in
[3:45] response to the comments made in this podcast, which Crow's team has responded to. We will be linking
[3:51] to that letter and those statements in the episode description. Anyway, let's get into it. Before
[3:58] we do, I'm just going to ask you to press the subscribe button if you would. We can bring you
[4:02] these conversations because we are independent media and we really appreciate your support.
[4:08] OK, that's enough. Let's get into it. Congressman.
[4:11] Congressman, you are the talk of DC. You pulled a full Gordon Ramsay and filleted
[4:21] Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, war, who knows what he's the secretary of, possibly chaos,
[4:28] possibly forever war. What was the significance of you asking about Tim Palatori? Who is Tim Palatori
[4:37] and why are you anxious about him? Well, there's rightfully a lot of attention on the quagmire that
[4:46] is the war in Iran now, the vaccine mandate, all the things they're doing to jeopardize our service
[4:53] members. But there hasn't been as much attention paid to the rank corruption and the pay to pay
[4:59] politics that Pete Hegseth and his cronies have turned a lot of the Department of Defense and his
[5:05] front office into. Right. So the significance of this is you have a man in Tim Palatori who used to be
[5:13] Pete Hegseth, private attorney, who has basically been given a key role in the in the Department of
[5:20] Defense and the ability to maintain a private law practice at the same time. And I can explain how
[5:26] they've been able to pull this off so that he can earn money, be paid by God knows who. At the same time,
[5:32] he's advising the secretary of defense on promotions and important national security issues. It is not just
[5:40] corruption, but it's jeopardizing. In my view, it's jeopardizing our safety and the security of
[5:45] Americans. So so how does this happen? Because normally there's a vetting process. So something
[5:51] like this should be flagged. But the implication of your questions yesterday in the committee was that
[5:57] normal processes had not been followed. That's right. Well, first of all, what Pete Hegseth has done,
[6:06] you know, he claims unfaltering loyalty to Donald Trump. But then he's hiring people who Donald Trump
[6:12] has fired, who he has disparaged in the case of Tim Palatori. Like this is a lawyer who used to serve
[6:19] as a lawyer for Donald Trump in his campaign, was fired by Trump and his campaign team and called a
[6:25] liar and disparaged by Donald Trump. Pete Hegseth uses a very unique set of appointments. So what he did
[6:34] was he appointed parlatory, did a direct commission, and made him a Navy Reserve Officer. And by making
[6:43] him a Navy Reserve Officer, a couple of things happened. Number one, this position, which is
[6:49] normally a Senate confirmed political appointee position, was not. It's a military position. So he
[6:56] bypasses the Senate confirmation process. And by making him a reserve officer, it also bypasses the White
[7:03] House vetting process through the PPO, the personnel office of the White House. So that's how he bypassed
[7:12] all of those normal processes. This person didn't have a security clearance when he first made the
[7:17] appointment. It's unclear whether he still does. And then on top of it, also by making him a Navy Reserve
[7:22] Officer, it allows him to maintain a private business, a consultancy or a law firm, and make money at the
[7:29] same time as he's working basically full time at the Pentagon as well. So that's how they have been
[7:35] able to take advantage of loopholes in the system to do what they have set up at the Pentagon.
[7:40] Wow. And do we know why Donald Trump fired him?
[7:44] We're we are trying to get to the bottom of that. I mean, there's some something bad happened with
[7:49] Parla Tori and Donald Trump's lawyers in the White House. We're not really sure what. So there's
[7:54] there are really more questions and answers at this point. Let me tell you about this neat wallet
[8:03] by Ridge. And it's one of those upgrades you notice immediately because it's super slim,
[8:08] it fits comfortably in your front pocket, and it still holds up to 12 cards plus cash without
[8:15] turning into a George Constanza lump. The design is clean and it's modern and it's built from premium
[8:23] materials like aluminum and carbon fiber. So it actually feels durable, not like something you're
[8:29] going to have to replace in a year. Plus, it has RFID blocking, which provides some peace of mind when
[8:36] traveling or in crowded places. They've got a ton of styles too, so you can actually pick something that
[8:42] fits your vibe. And honestly, with the lifetime warranty, this is probably the last wallet you'll need.
[8:48] Right now you can get 10% off with code BEAST at Ridge.com. Seriously, go check it out. That's Ridge.com,
[8:56] code BEAST for 10% off. And after you buy, make sure you tell them that our show sent you. It really helps us out.
[9:07] Does Donald Trump know that Tim Pellatore is working as a special advisor in the Pentagon for the secretary?
[9:18] Well, that's why I did my questioning. I was in part speaking to Donald Trump, which I never do.
[9:23] Audience of one. Audience of one.
[9:25] Exactly. There's no love loss between me and Donald Trump, clearly. The man tried to indict me and put
[9:31] me in prison in February, accused me of treason, said he was going to have me executed. So I was an
[9:38] impeachment prosecutor in their first impeachment trial. So there's a long history between Donald Trump
[9:43] and I, of us going at each other. But in this instance, I was highlighting for the White House
[9:51] that Pete Hegseth is grabbing people and putting them in key political positions where they are able
[9:59] to make tremendous amounts of money, who the White House has disparaged and cast out into the street.
[10:04] Well, you also implied that Tim Pellatore in his legal work had clients who were foreign countries.
[10:13] Pete Hegseth didn't seem to know. I mean, we literally it will be a masterclass for legal students.
[10:20] I think the way you filleted him yesterday was an extraordinary performance and you could see him
[10:25] sort of dancing on the head of a pin. Do we know if Tim Pellatore is working for foreign governments?
[10:31] We have heard many rumors that that could be true. So that is why I asked that question,
[10:41] to try to figure that out. But either way, Pete Hegseth answered that. Either yes or no
[10:48] is disturbing in its own right. But if the answer is yes, then that's a huge problem, obviously.
[10:56] If the answer is no, then Pete Hegseth has appointed someone a senior advisor,
[11:01] given them a security clearance, presumably, and positioned them in a senior office and travels
[11:06] with somebody and has no idea who his clients are or what potential conflicts of interest are.
[11:11] So either way, it's problematic.
[11:12] So Pete Hegseth is asking for a budget of $1.5 trillion for the Pentagon. We appear to be stuck
[11:24] in a quagmire with the Strait of Hormuz. This is a man who left both veterans' organizations that he was
[11:34] working for under accusations of financial incompetence and drunkenness. You've been in
[11:42] the military. You've served in Afghanistan, in Iraq. You talk to a lot of people who also served.
[11:48] What do you think of Pete Hegseth as the Secretary of Defense slash war?
[11:53] I think he's, it's worse than incompetent. I think he is a, he's a vengeful individual who,
[12:02] who not just lacks the qualification, but has, has a meanness to him and a corruption of his heart and
[12:13] soul to him that allows him to do things to people in organizations that most normal people would not
[12:20] do, right? I think he is in extreme danger, which is why my focus has been getting him
[12:25] to, getting him fired basically, right? Like, is he going to resign? I've called for him to resign
[12:30] and I know it's popular for people to call for him to resign. This man's not going to resign. He's just
[12:34] not. I know, I know some people have called for him to impeach. I would love to have him impeached.
[12:39] And of course I would pursue that, but we don't have the votes for that either, right? Republicans are
[12:44] simply not going to do that right now so long as they hold the majority. So what can we do? We can make it,
[12:51] so untenable for him and highlight the level of corruption and the incompetence. As you point out,
[12:56] the Strait of Hormuz, there was no plan here. We started a war without a plan for handle very,
[13:04] very sensitive items, right? Like how to protect our troops in the region. Clearly there was no plan
[13:09] for that. And, and American soldiers and service members are dead as a result of that, right? There
[13:14] was no plan for the Strait of Hormuz. In fact, how do we know there was no plan? Because the Department of
[13:19] Defense was sending its minesweepers to Asia in the weeks leading up to the war, right? And if,
[13:26] if there was a plan to secure the Straits, we wouldn't have been doing that. We would have kept
[13:32] those minesweepers in the Middle East because they're essential to keeping the Straits open. So
[13:36] this has been bungled from the very start. Do you think that Pete Hegseth survives this war? I mean,
[13:45] it felt very clear yesterday that Donald Trump had put him out there to be very much the face of this
[13:52] war. I mean, I don't want to say it's a forever war, but the one thing that he promised his MAGA
[13:58] base that there would be no wars, there would be no forever wars. Here we are, at least right now,
[14:05] it looks like the negotiations have come to a halt. Nobody understands how we're going to get out of
[14:11] this situation. Does Pete Hegseth become the inevitable fool guy here?
[14:15] I just don't know. Every time I think he's on the ropes, you know, he finds a way to survive.
[14:24] I think the way to get Pete Hegseth out of this position is to highlight his incompetence,
[14:30] his corruption, painting over the full truth of the advice he's giving to Donald Trump. Donald Trump
[14:37] values loyalty, people who are willing to be completely loyal to him, not to their jobs,
[14:42] not to the Constitution, to him. But if he thinks that people are incompetent or that there's too much
[14:48] drama associated with their job, as is the case of Kristi Noem, he will tire of them. So our job is
[14:55] to highlight the corruption, the incompetence, that Pete Hegseth is telling them what he wants to hear
[15:02] instead of the truth, you know, painting over ugly realities and giving him bad advice. I think that
[15:10] is the most effective way to draw that wedge and to get Pete Hegseth out of this really important
[15:15] position where he's jeopardizing our troops. How bad is the corruption, do you think, in the Pentagon?
[15:24] Well, what I'm hearing is it's pretty stunning, right? I'm hearing a situation now where general
[15:30] officers have to lobby for positions, right? There is a well-defined process for our senior military
[15:40] appointments that's based on merit, it's based on performance, it's based on experience. They have
[15:47] redesigned that process, funneled it through Pete Hegseth's office so that it's based on loyalty,
[15:54] it's based on lobbying. This is stunning that the people who are the most responsible for our
[16:02] national security and the welfare of our troops might be getting appointments based on who they're
[16:07] paying or who they're lobbying or who they're buddies with. How dangerous is that for our men and women
[16:15] who we have a sacred oath to protect? I think we are going to be spending years uncovering corruption,
[16:22] the likes of which we have never seen in the United States of America. We have our work cut out for
[16:27] us. If we regain the majority, we have an obligation to uncover this corruption, not because we want to
[16:34] go after people or be vengeful or settle the score, I have little interest in that, but because they are
[16:40] stealing from my constituents, they are stealing from the American people. People who can't afford to pay
[16:46] their groceries or their rent or losing their healthcare are having money taken out of their
[16:51] pockets and put into the pockets of Donald Trump and his cronies and political hacks. And that is wrong.
[16:58] There was also a report in the Financial Times that two days before the war in Iran began,
[17:07] Pete Hegseth's bank at Morgan Stanley had looked into investing in an ETF which specialised in defence
[17:16] contractors. Now, Pete Hegseth has said that he's denied it. He said, I didn't do that. But I'm assuming
[17:24] that it's quite easy for people to take advantage of the knowledge they have and to make investments where
[17:34] they know these things are probably going to be advantageous.
[17:40] Yeah. One of the things that the Trump era has highlighted is how many holes there are in the
[17:45] system that allow corruption, allow conflicts of interest, things that maybe we just took for
[17:52] granted as customs and traditions because people come into public service to do the right thing. And
[17:57] as soon as you have people in the position who don't care about our traditions and our norms as a
[18:03] democracy and are willing to just monetize the position, they drive a truck through those gaps.
[18:09] Right. So one of our tasks as we move forward is not rebuilding what once was or taking us back
[18:15] to where we were. We need to build a new thing. It has to be different and look different. And it has
[18:20] to have a lot more protections against corruptions and conflicts of interest, which is why I've signed
[18:26] on to efforts and pushing efforts to ban stock trading for members of Congress. Right. Which is why we
[18:31] need to do that for senior positions within the administration too. Like if you want to go into
[18:35] public service, you shouldn't be making money and cashing in on that. Right. That should be a sacrifice.
[18:40] Service entails sacrifice. Right. And right now, this administration is just turning that on its head.
[18:48] And we have our work cut out for us in the years ahead in terms of reform, legislating, and, you know,
[18:56] putting brick walls in front of those gaps right now that people are using.
[19:00] Okay. Final question, because I know you have to go. But you are part of a relatively new band of
[19:08] Democratic Congress people. You took an area in Colorado that had just been held for four previous
[19:15] terms by a Republican. You're the first Democrat to be elected in that district. Today, we got the news
[19:21] that Janet Mills is no longer standing for the Senate seat in Maine. She's the governor there
[19:29] currently. But if she were to win that Senate seat, she would be aged 80 going into the House.
[19:35] And one of your military compatriots, Graham Plattner, is likely to get the nomination for that seat.
[19:44] So is this a sign of the Democratic Party relinquishing some of their older people and
[19:52] realizing that it's time to go with a younger band of candidates?
[19:58] No, it's not a sign of that, because what I've learned in politics is that political power is
[20:03] never given away. People don't easily seed it and give it away and unfortunately pass the baton
[20:09] gracefully to the next generation. It has to be taken. Political power must be taken. And what you're
[20:14] seeing is the next generation of leadership, servant leaders stepping up around the country and taking
[20:19] that political power. They're fighting for it. They are earning the trust of people. That is why
[20:26] I've been proud to be the chair of the battlegrounds. I've been running around the country. I've been in
[20:31] New Hampshire and Illinois and Michigan and Wisconsin and Arizona. I've been recruiting that next
[20:39] generation of servant leaders who are stepping up to take power back and who are going to
[20:44] reform the Democratic Party because we have need massive reform to the party who are going to
[20:49] take us in an entirely different direction and who are going to not just win an election. I'm so tired
[20:55] of just stumbling from election season to election season. We need a movement that's going to forever
[21:02] break the fever of the mega movement and is going to spark a new enlightenment in America, a Democratic
[21:11] Enlightenment that's going to move us for a generation in an entirely different direction.
[21:16] What an interesting strategy to highlight to an audience of one, Donald Trump, the president,
[21:26] that his secretary of defense slash war has been hiring people that he's fired and using a loophole to
[21:34] do it. So he needs no Senate confirmation or to go through the usual processes. And there he is,
[21:41] sitting in the middle of the Pentagon as a special adviser to Pete Hegseth. Will Pete Hegseth survive?
[21:48] Well, Jason Crow hopes he won't. If you have been, thank you for joining us. Don't forget to subscribe to
[21:55] our button. Just hit the button on the subscription box. And don't forget to leave us a comment telling
[22:01] us what you think. Is this a good strategy to get Donald Trump to pay attention to Pete Hegseth? Let
[22:07] us know what you think. So the good news is we have so many Bee Beast tier members now. There are too
[22:12] many names to read out. And we really appreciate your support. Thanks to our production team, Devon
[22:19] Rogerino, Ryan Murray, Rachel Passer, Heather Passaro, Neil Rosenhaus.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →