Try Free

Hormuz blockade and nuclear deadlock reshape US–Iran negotiations, analysts say

April 28, 2026 11m 1,835 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Hormuz blockade and nuclear deadlock reshape US–Iran negotiations, analysts say, published April 28, 2026. The transcript contains 1,835 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Tuesday marks two months of a war launched by the U.S. and Israel on Iran, a war that's reshaped the region and is hurting countries far beyond. On February 28th, the U.S. and Israel struck Iran, assassinating its supreme leader, Ali Khamenei. Khamenei was replaced by his son, and government..."

[0:00] Tuesday marks two months of a war launched by the U.S. and Israel on Iran, [0:04] a war that's reshaped the region and is hurting countries far beyond. [0:08] On February 28th, the U.S. and Israel struck Iran, [0:12] assassinating its supreme leader, Ali Khamenei. [0:15] Khamenei was replaced by his son, [0:16] and government institutions remain largely unchanged. [0:20] A temporary ceasefire is now in place. [0:22] Iran's health minister says that U.S.-Israeli airstrikes killed [0:26] more than 3,000 Iranians over the five and a half weeks of fighting. [0:30] Hospitals, homes at historic sites lie in ruins. [0:34] So does the Iranian economy, [0:36] already crippled by years of Western sanctions. [0:40] The conflict spilled over across the region, [0:42] most acutely in Lebanon, [0:43] where Iran-allied Hezbollah attacked Israel on March 2nd. [0:47] Israeli attacks have since killed thousands of Lebanese, [0:51] displaced more than a million more. [0:53] And it's invaded southern Lebanon, [0:55] raising villages to the ground. [0:57] A ceasefire there is on the brink of collapse. [1:00] Gulf nations weren't spared either. [1:03] Iran tried to spread the cost of war [1:05] by attacking its own neighbours, [1:07] hitting energy infrastructure and civilian sites. [1:10] The cost of the war has been felt worldwide. [1:13] Rival blockades by Iran and the U.S. on the Strait of Hormuz [1:16] have upended global energy markets. [1:19] Qatar's foreign ministry says that using the Strait of Hormuz [1:22] as a political weapon is not acceptable [1:26] and has warned against the possibility of a frozen conflict in the Gulf [1:30] as the talks between the U.S. and Iran hit an impasse. [1:34] On reopening the Strait, first of all, we have said from day one, [1:39] the act of blocking navigation through the Strait [1:44] is not something that can be justified or accepted in any situation. [1:48] And using the Strait as leverage in any political or military conflict [1:54] is something that we refuse as a premise. [1:56] And therefore, anything that justifies or legitimizes [2:02] the use of the Strait as a political weapon, [2:05] for us this is not accepted in any means. [2:08] But we are engaging with all our interlocutors [2:11] to get the Strait opened as soon as possible. [2:13] We believe it should have never been closed [2:15] and it should be opened immediately [2:17] regardless of other considerations going on in the region. [2:21] Let's bring in our guests here in Doha. [2:24] We're joined by Mark Kimmett, [2:26] a retired U.S. general and former Assistant Secretary of State [2:29] for Political and Military Affairs. [2:31] Joining us from Tehran is Mohamed Aslami, [2:34] who's a political researcher, columnist and economist. [2:37] And also here in Doha, Zaydoun Al-Qinani, [2:40] the founding director of the Arab Perspectives Institute. [2:43] Gentlemen, welcome to you all. [2:44] General, let's start with you. [2:45] We just heard Qatar cautioning against the possibility [2:47] of a frozen conflict in the Gulf. [2:50] Two months on, is that a realistic possibility? [2:53] I really don't. [2:54] I think that the significant pressure on the world economy [2:57] and what would look to be a formation of a coalition of nations [3:03] willing to escort the tankers in and out [3:05] and the fertilizer in and out, [3:07] I don't see this as a frozen conflict, [3:10] but an emerging solution. [3:12] Mohamed Aslami, we were hearing earlier [3:15] that the White House is considering the latest Iranian proposals. [3:20] Do we happen to know? [3:21] Would you like to speculate what's actually in those proposals? [3:25] I think that, first of all, thank you so much for having me. [3:31] I think that the Iranians have declared that [3:33] the state of the promise will not open in any ways [3:37] unless the Americans stop in the naval blockade. [3:42] And regarding the negotiations, [3:45] the Iranians will not going to negotiate with the Americans [3:48] if the Americans wouldn't change their decision [3:53] regarding the naval blockade too. [3:55] So I think that, yes, [3:57] the Iranians are thinking about the framework [3:58] for considering some diplomatic settlements, [4:01] but we have yet to see what's going on in the future. [4:05] Zaidoun, as we've been reporting, [4:07] Gulf leaders were meeting today in Saudi Arabia [4:10] after being directly hit during this conflict. [4:13] They're still not shaping the negotiations, [4:17] at least not directly. [4:18] They don't have a seat at the table [4:21] if and when those negotiations resume. [4:23] Why? [4:24] Well, it doesn't necessarily mean [4:26] that they don't have a say in the negotiations. [4:28] The Islamabad talks wasn't unilaterally facilitated [4:31] by the Pakistani mediators. [4:33] Many regional actors have been involved [4:35] in pushing for those negotiations to take place, [4:37] such as Turkey and Egypt, [4:38] and most prominently as well Saudi Arabia. [4:40] Talks between the GCC countries [4:42] and talks between the GCC and their international [4:44] and regional allies have always existed [4:47] since the beginning of the war. [4:49] They are involved in the different format [4:50] of the negotiations. [4:52] It's just the level of the official term [4:55] and the theme of their involvement [4:57] that determines it to be a bit different. [4:59] The Qataris used to be way more involved [5:01] in the past in facilitating talks. [5:03] The Al-Manis were also way more involved. [5:05] The location, the geographical location [5:07] of the negotiations, being in Islamabad, [5:09] does not mean it's completely isolating [5:12] the GCC perspective here. [5:13] General, President Trump says that Iran has asked him [5:16] to lift his blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. [5:19] With the straits still constrained [5:22] and the U.S. continuing to maintain pressure, [5:25] how close are we to a miscalculation at sea [5:28] rather than a diplomatic breakthrough [5:30] the longer this blockade goes on? [5:33] Well, first of all, I'm encouraged [5:34] by the offer made by President Trump [5:36] to lift the American portion of the dual blockade. [5:40] I would just certainly hope [5:41] that the Iranians reciprocate. [5:42] And one of the reasons is for the very notion you mentioned, [5:46] a miscalculation at sea. [5:48] Some young Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps [5:51] motorboat commander, speedboat commander [5:54] goes out in the middle of the Gulf, [5:56] serendipitously hits a tanker [5:59] or an American ship causing casualties. [6:01] I think that could cause the situation [6:04] to blow up again. [6:07] Mohamed Aslani, Iran has in recent days [6:10] engaged Russia, Oman, and other regional mediators. [6:16] Is that a sign of strength on its part, [6:19] of confidence or of mistrust? [6:25] You know that right now the Americans [6:26] missed the chance to negotiate with the Iranians. [6:30] Right now Iranians are engaging [6:32] in so many different informed, [6:35] I mean important discussions [6:37] with Pakistanis, with their Omanic counterparts [6:39] and I should mention Russians. [6:42] The Iranian foreign minister met President Putin. [6:46] Their discussions was not only about the negotiations [6:49] or the diplomatic solutions [6:51] for the Persian Gulf and the Serda Formos. [6:54] It was more than that [6:55] and it was about so many other topics [6:57] that the Iranians and the Russians [6:58] are thinking about collaboratively. [7:01] So I think that when it comes to Serda Formos, [7:04] it is clear that the Iranians [7:05] will not leave their Serda Formos [7:08] to go back to what was before the war. [7:13] Let's pause for a moment [7:15] to take a look at the sticking points. [7:17] Iran's latest ceasefire proposal [7:19] focuses on ending the fighting first. [7:21] Tehran says that it will reopen the Strait of Hormuz [7:24] if Washington lifts its naval blockade [7:27] on Iranian ports, [7:28] but that nuclear talks would be delayed. [7:32] U.S. officials say that Trump [7:33] is unhappy with Iran's proposal [7:35] because it doesn't address Iran's nuclear program. [7:38] Washington is pushing for a 20-year suspension [7:41] of Iran's uranium enrichment program [7:43] and the transfer of its highly enriched uranium stockpile. [7:47] Tehran has rejected demands to abandon enrichment. [7:51] Iran says that its nuclear program is civilian. [7:54] It's also a signatory [7:55] to the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. [7:59] Trump demands assurances [8:00] that Iran will never be able to build a nuclear weapon. [8:03] He's repeatedly criticized the 2015 nuclear deal [8:07] for allowing some enrichment. [8:09] So, General, we've just mapped out the standoff, [8:11] no agreement on a deal [8:12] or what a deal actually looks like. [8:15] So, what breaks the deadlock? [8:17] Well, first of all, that's in no way a deal. [8:20] That's a proposal. [8:20] There are two proposals, [8:22] one from the Iranians, [8:23] one from the Americans. [8:24] I think more important than what breaks the deadlock [8:28] is what doesn't move this along. [8:30] And it's the notion that somehow the Iranians are saying, [8:34] for the Strait of Hormuz being opened up, [8:37] we want to kick the nuclear negotiations [8:39] down the road to an indefinite period. [8:41] That's what the Americans went to war for. [8:44] There is very little chance [8:45] that the Americans will accept any proposal [8:47] that kicks the nuclear program down, [8:50] that kicks that can down the road. [8:51] And Zaidoun, with economic pressure continuing, [8:55] as far as the Gulf nations are concerned, [8:59] from the Strait disruption, [9:01] are they pushing harder for a deal, [9:03] any deal or stronger guarantees? [9:06] I think in the short term, [9:08] they're pushing harder, [9:09] given that they're following a mindset [9:11] of an emergency crisis. [9:13] It's an existential direct threat [9:15] to their geopolitical security. [9:17] So, in terms of the short term, [9:19] they're also overlooking the, [9:20] perhaps, the divergences or the differences [9:23] amongst the GCC political house, [9:25] which is why they're trying to prevent [9:28] the continuity of this war in the short term. [9:30] But long term, one can imagine [9:32] that there may be diverse political approaches [9:35] and opinions in the future relationship with Iran, [9:38] in the future relationship between the GCC states, [9:40] perhaps revisiting security arrangements [9:42] that would ensure much more collective coordination [9:45] between one another [9:45] to ensure that they could be stronger together, [9:48] politically, institutionally, [9:50] but also from a security perspective [9:51] to prevent such an attack [9:53] or such a direct threat happening in the future. [9:56] And Mohamed Aslani, [9:57] with the straits still restricted, [9:59] does Iran see its control over the straits [10:01] as its main leverage [10:04] in shaping the form of, [10:07] indeed, the outcome of any negotiations? [10:13] Let me tell you something. [10:14] After the war, [10:15] there was a debate in Iran. [10:17] It was not about the Islamic Republic. [10:19] Most of the policymakers think that, [10:23] but that the not controlling the straits [10:26] of Hormuzh is a historical mistake [10:29] by the Iranians. [10:30] It's not about supporting the Islamic Republic. [10:33] It is for Iranians. [10:35] It's about supporting the Iranian nation [10:37] and their right, [10:39] the right of the nation [10:40] to control their straits of Hormuzh. [10:43] So I think that from the Iranian point of view, [10:46] the straits of Hormuzh is much more [10:48] than a tactical card. [10:50] It's a strategic point of view [10:52] regarding the straits of Hormuzh. [10:53] And right now, [10:54] the Iranians are open to discuss [10:56] with every country [10:57] regarding their free passage [10:59] of the straits of Hormuzh [11:00] based on the bilateral relations. [11:02] And, General, last one to you. [11:04] If talks remain stalled, [11:06] does the military track [11:08] start to take over again by default, [11:11] even if neither side actually [11:12] wants any further escalation? [11:15] Well, I actually think [11:16] the middle point is [11:18] that coalition of nations [11:19] that will be blockade runners [11:21] and escorting the ships [11:23] in and out of the strait of Hormuzh. [11:25] If Iran doesn't have [11:27] that leverage [11:28] of claiming sovereignty [11:30] over the strait of Hormuzh [11:32] and a willingness [11:32] to use military power [11:34] against those blockade runners, [11:36] I think they're going to find themselves [11:37] in a very difficult position [11:38] about trying to not have [11:40] nuclear negotiations [11:42] because without the strait of Hormuzh, [11:44] what do they have? [11:46] General Mount Kermit, [11:47] Mohammed Aslami, [11:48] and Zaidoun Al-Kinani. [11:50] Many thanks indeed to you.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →