About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of GOP rep. says Vance may have just cost himself the presidency from CNN, published October 22, 2026. The transcript contains 2,627 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Just 12 days ago to the midterms and the battle for power is uglier than ever. President Trump and Vice President Vance defending Vivek Ramaswamy, the Republican candidate for governor in Ohio, as the backlash is intensifying about his controversial attack ad. The ad features the estranged mother..."
[0:00] Just 12 days ago to the midterms and the battle for power is uglier than ever.
[0:04] President Trump and Vice President Vance defending Vivek Ramaswamy, the Republican
[0:09] candidate for governor in Ohio, as the backlash is intensifying about his controversial attack
[0:14] ad. The ad features the estranged mother of Amy Acton, his Democratic opponent for the
[0:21] governorship, calling Acton a liar and urging people not to vote for her. What the ad doesn't
[0:26] say is that as a 12 year old girl, Acton was removed from her mother's home after her stepfather
[0:32] was charged with raping her and her mother stayed married to him. President Trump says he knows
[0:37] nothing about the ad, but he weighed in anyway, while Vice President Vance says he's quote
[0:43] disgusted, not by the ad, but by Republicans complaining about it. I hear the mother went
[0:51] very rogue on the daughter. It doesn't have a lot of respect for the daughter. And I think the mother
[0:57] is a witness to things also. Well, I'll be honest with you, whether the ad was appropriate
[1:01] or not is not really my concern. But I have to admit that I'm a little bit disgusted when
[1:07] I see Republicans across the country who are whining more about that advertisement than they
[1:12] are about what the congressional Democrats and other Democrats want to do to the United States
[1:16] of America. The big question now, will this ad move votes and which way? John. All right.
[1:22] With us now, CNN host and political commentator Michael Smirconish. Michael, great to see you this
[1:27] morning. This is the latest polling that came out overnight from Fox News of the governor's race
[1:30] in Ohio. Basically no clear leader here. Other polls have showed a slightly bigger margin for Amy
[1:35] Acton, but this is the state of play right now. I want to play for you what Nancy Mace, Republican
[1:42] Congresswoman from South Carolina, had to say not just about Ramaswamy, but about Vice President
[1:48] J.D. Vance. This ad is going to go down as the most shameful, disgusting, offensive ad this
[1:56] election season. Somehow Vivek Ramaswamy somehow managed to limbo under the lowest bar of decency
[2:04] in this country to go after a woman who was allegedly raped by her stepfather and not just like accused,
[2:13] this guy was arrested and charged with child rape. And the idea that the vice president would go to
[2:21] the mattresses to defend this ad might have cost J.D. Vance the presidency.
[2:26] It's that last part, Michael, I want to focus on first there. The Ramaswamy ad has been out for a day.
[2:33] People have been talking about it. But J.D. Vance now not just leaning in, but wrapping himself in that ad.
[2:40] I wonder what you think the political impact of that might be significant. I think it's going to
[2:47] follow him with regard to the ad. When I first saw it yesterday, I said on radio that it was political
[2:52] malpractice to run it. It weaponizes a child's sex abuse. And it also preys upon an elderly woman
[3:01] whose wellness I question. If you saw it in a vacuum, I mean, I'm trying to be fair here, but it's
[3:07] hard. If you saw it in a vacuum and you didn't know the background facts, I don't know, maybe it moves
[3:11] the needle. You at least would would question the veracity of Amy Acton. The moment you know what
[3:18] the background facts are, you see it for what it is. It's just despicable. Axios reported that
[3:24] the Ramaswamy campaign was showing it to persuadable voters with a positive result. I can only imagine
[3:31] that they didn't tell them that for 47 years, the quote unquote mother has been estranged from the
[3:38] daughter. It's repulsive. And the idea that we're talking about this 12 days out, not a good thing
[3:43] for Republicans, certainly not a good thing for Ramaswamy. Again, I just want to remind people
[3:49] the state we're talking about here. This is Ohio, a state that that President Trump won by, you know,
[3:55] almost 12 points against Kamala Harris two years ago. He's going back to Ohio. The reports are next week
[4:02] when the president is in Ohio. What are the chances this is all gone? Or is this now 12 days
[4:07] of stink left in Iowa? I mean, Ohio, I should say. Well, who knows what's to come, right? There's
[4:15] still there's still time on the clock for other incidents like this to drop. But to the extent
[4:20] that the vice president or president stepped foot in Ohio between now and the conclusion of the midterm,
[4:26] of course, it's going to come up. The president's initial instinct was the correct one when he tried to
[4:31] distance himself and say, I don't know anything about it. Then he made the mistake of saying
[4:36] things that showed that he had awareness of exactly what was going on here. But with regard
[4:40] to the vice president, you know, a smart guy, by all accounts, I just don't understand why he would
[4:47] embrace this. And you're not going to run from it because there's a lot of video and it's the sort
[4:51] of thing that's going to come up well into the future, in my opinion. Joining me now, CNN political
[4:56] analyst, White House correspondent for The New York Times, Zolan Kano-Youngs, and Kate Santoli's
[5:00] congressional reporter for Axios. It's good to see you guys. Zolan, this now moves beyond
[5:05] Ramaswamy. What is the deal with J.D. Vance and his approach, do you think, to this?
[5:12] Yeah, I mean, when you heard those comments yesterday, you can almost sort of think here
[5:17] that the vice president was taking a lead from the strategy that President Trump has exemplified
[5:25] so many times of thinking that you just can't back down no matter the issue when faced with widespread
[5:31] criticism from the media, from outside stakeholders, from Democrats. But the thing here is this is
[5:38] different. This isn't just facing widespread criticism from Democrats in the media. You do
[5:44] have bipartisan criticism over an issue that, you know, our politics is a it's a cold business in
[5:50] the U.S., but you still think there's some issues that would require putting politics aside and just
[5:56] saying this is this is off base and a personal history of family history that involves sex abuse
[6:04] you would think would be one of those. But but apparently it's not for them for this White House.
[6:09] And again, this the Ramaswamy campaign running this ad has prompted broad widespread criticism,
[6:16] not just among Democrats, but also among Republicans. You highlighted Senator John Huston's quote.
[6:22] There was also an official who ran in the primary against Ramaswamy, who is further to the right,
[6:27] who has come out, distanced himself from this ad as well. You're seeing criticism among Republicans
[6:34] in Ohio and more broadly nationally among many Republicans as well. Yeah. And Kate,
[6:40] to what someone's hitting at right here, Axios is reporting that Vance, with the way he's responding
[6:45] to this and approaching this, is setting the tone for his 2028 run with a defiant take on that ad.
[6:52] That never back down is part of his 28 mindset as he thinks too many Republicans sacrifice allies to
[7:00] make controversies go away. What do you think that could mean for 2028? What else is Axios picking up
[7:06] here? I mean, it definitely is clear that he's running the groundwork. He's laying the groundwork for
[7:13] a 2028 run, you know, heavily defending Ramaswamy here, telling Republicans how they should be thinking
[7:19] about this and instead focusing on winning this race and focusing on how important it is to back the
[7:24] vague here instead of complaining about this. And, you know, he is taking a note out of President
[7:29] Trump's notebook and just going all in on defending the Republican rather than acknowledging that maybe,
[7:34] you know, some of the Republicans who have come out and called the ad disgusting, like Nancy
[7:37] Mace or said they wouldn't have done it, like Republican Senator John Husted instead going full
[7:42] in on that. And, you know, it's really interesting that we've seen this divide here within the Republican
[7:46] Party just two weeks out from Election Day, a lot of backlash to this ad overall. And it's also
[7:52] interesting that, you know, we've seen Republicans not just in Ohio but in other states kind of go
[7:57] ugly and go personally attacking a lot of Democratic opponents here, which shows maybe they're not
[8:02] coming from a position of strength and they're worried about a lot of these races.
[8:05] I do want to start with this Amy Acton ad and the decision of the vice president to defend it as,
[8:13] in his words, the truth. The ad obscures the fact that the woman in the ad had her children taken
[8:22] away from her because her husband was sexually abusing her daughter. How is that disqualifying for
[8:29] Ramaswamy? And perhaps, I mean, if it's disqualifying for Ramaswamy, is it disqualifying for the vice
[8:35] president? No, I think it's a gross ad on a moral level and wrong. On a political level,
[8:42] I don't know how you can argue that this was smart. And to have the closing message of your opponent,
[8:48] you know, framed in such a way, I don't see a defense of it. And the vice president defending
[8:55] it? I mean, he is defending it. I mean, that's the part I'm confused by. I think at least when it
[9:01] comes to the president's comments, it seemed he was doing more of the classic Trump, like,
[9:04] observing the situation from afar and describing it. But, you know, I think that the Republicans
[9:09] were looking at this and saying, you know, this is wrong. You know, we're not going to put ourselves
[9:13] in a position to defend it. You've seen some in Ohio doing that. I mean, to me, that puts you on the
[9:19] right side going into the final two weeks of this election. You know, according to the VP, though,
[9:22] you're one of the whiny Republicans. Because he went further than that. He actually not only
[9:27] was sort of tacitly endorsing it. But then he said anyone who's a Republican who complains about it
[9:34] is just whining and not really doing the work of a Republican in order to get another Republican
[9:39] elected. So, you know, I think actually not only is the ad itself morally repugnant, as you have
[9:46] rightly said, political malpractice also. But beyond that, what you're seeing is the vice president of
[9:53] the United States, who is one of the leaders of his party, then actually attacking other Republicans.
[9:59] That is not a good closing message. I think it's also like, when did child rape and family
[10:05] abuse become part of the GOP playbook? Like, is the Republican Party really supposed to be fine
[10:10] with child rape or using it like weaponizing a woman's childhood abuse for political gain? That
[10:15] seems so sick. It seems so obvious. It seems like everyone should answer the way you have answered. And yet,
[10:20] there are a number of people who are taking the complete other route. Like,
[10:24] this woman allowed this horrible thing to happen to her daughter and her children were rightly taken
[10:28] away from her. She hasn't seen her mother since that day she was in the courtroom when she was taken
[10:32] away from her mom. And Vivek Ramaswamy's team finds her, digs her up, and re-traumatizes his political
[10:37] candidate for what? Political points? It's gross. So, Ben Shapiro says this. Vivek Ramaswamy's ad
[10:44] is apparently unprecedented. It would be just awful to activate all the members of a politician's
[10:50] family to attack them, as the Democrats did with every member of RFK's family. That seems like a
[10:58] straight-up false equivalency. These are not the same thing. Excuse me, I sound like RFK when I spoke
[11:04] there. RFK Jr. is a public figure. His family members are public figures. They are associated with one
[11:12] another. And he's a member of the President's Cabinet. This is a candidate for United States
[11:19] Senate. Her mother, she hasn't spoken to since she was 12 years old. She's a private citizen. They
[11:24] have a personal issue because her mother was helping to support her father, the man, excuse me, her
[11:31] stepfather, who sexually abused her. How can you compare that to a family squabble among the elite
[11:38] Kennedys? It's just not even close to being comparable. And I think it's sad that Republicans,
[11:43] I'm so glad that Peter's standing up on this, and I assume that Scott will too, but I just think it's
[11:49] sad that Donald Trump and J.D. Vance are doubling down on this message at the last two weeks of a
[11:56] campaign when people don't care about these divisive issues. They care about jobs and health care and gas
[12:03] prices. I also think, I mean, look, we know that Ramaswamy and J.D. Vance are very close and personally
[12:10] and politically, but at the same time, there was another option available to the Vice President,
[12:15] which is to not address at that rally, right? It's one thing if a reporter asks you, he decided at a rally
[12:23] to minimize the allegations that are at the center of that ad. He chose to do that. That's a very
[12:32] surprising choice. And I wonder what that says about him to you. Yeah, he could have just ignored it.
[12:40] You know, I mean, campaigns make decisions, surrogates come in and campaign for them. I'm sure
[12:44] not all surrogates agree with all the decisions that are made by all the campaigns they support.
[12:49] So you could have just ignored it. This issue of whining, I took some issue with that today because
[12:57] I don't see people whining about this. I think they are warning about this. There's a heck of a lot of
[13:02] Republicans in Ohio and elsewhere who would love to see a Republican get elected governor of Ohio,
[13:07] who do not believe that this is a defensible ad, nor do they believe it's a good strategy.
[13:13] So whether you take it from the moral view or you take it just from the political strategy view,
[13:17] there's a lot of concern. That's not whining. That's warning. And so I don't think it's necessarily
[13:24] a good idea in a race that is on a knife's edge in a state that's very close, where no one really
[13:29] knows what's going to happen. Sort of taking shots at people who, you know, just simply have an
[13:34] opinion about how a campaign should be run or the choices that a campaign should make.
[13:38] I don't think that's a particularly good idea. And so I know there's some people out there who
[13:42] want to say, you know, politics ain't beanbagged, whatever. And there will be people that debate
[13:46] campaign decisions. This is not whining. From what I've heard from my people in Ohio, it's warning
[13:53] that this may have actually been a backfire. It's going to blow up in their face.
[13:56] There's some CNN reporting that suggests that Republicans in the state, according to one
[14:02] operative, couldn't be more pissed at Robinson for dropping this on their laps two weeks before
[14:08] the midterms. One thing to remember about these issues, whenever a campaign makes a decision and
[14:11] you've been out there as a surrogate or you've been helping them or you're knocking on doors or
[14:14] whatever you're doing in that campaign, now you own it. Now you got to answer for it because it's what
[14:19] people want to talk about. And I'll guarantee you there are people that don't want to talk about this
[14:22] when they're out wanting to talk about, you know, other state issues.