Try Free

FULL PRESSER: Marco Rubio on Iran War, Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks and China at G7 Summit — AC1G

DRM News and DWS News November 10, 2026 23m 5,056 words 1 views
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of FULL PRESSER: Marco Rubio on Iran War, Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks and China at G7 Summit — AC1G from DRM News and DWS News, published November 10, 2026. The transcript contains 5,056 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"all right you guys ready so we had a good g7 meeting obviously uh hosted by some partners as well that came from saudi arabia and brazil and egypt and south korea we talked about a couple things today just to bring you up to speed first of all in the situation the middle east in particular the..."

[0:05] all right you guys ready so we had a good g7 meeting obviously uh hosted by some partners [0:11] as well that came from saudi arabia and brazil and egypt and south korea we talked about a couple [0:18] things today just to bring you up to speed first of all in the situation the middle east in [0:21] particular the straits of hormuz you know i informed our partners as we've been discussing [0:26] with you and others that at this point the economic campaign and the pressure and the [0:32] devastation that our economic campaign is having on the iranian regime is working so well that the [0:39] president really doesn't have any need to conduct major combat operations now obviously if iran [0:44] crosses certain red lines if their regime does certain things that should not happen i'm not [0:49] going to speculate what those are but you know what they are obviously the u.s military the most capable [0:54] military in the world stands ready to address it but as of now there's really no need for major combat [0:59] operations any longer because the blockade and the economic sanctions are doing devastation to [1:05] their economy and it's sad you know the iranian people deserve better than to be a third world [1:09] country which is where their leadership is taking them but that's what their leaders have brought [1:13] upon them in addition i reported back to them and just got an update just a few moments ago it looks [1:18] like the talks in abu dhabi were very productive i think the most important thing obviously there's a lot [1:22] of work to be done in that regard it's not like something that's on the verge of being solved in the [1:26] next 24 hours or anything like that but what's really important is that the europeans are at [1:31] the table they'll be discussing with our people they've been working very closely with jared and [1:35] steve who are there on every step along the way and it's actually our goal at some point to expand [1:41] this trilateral so it's not just the u.s ukraine and russia but also that the europeans be represented [1:46] at that table directly with these talks so hopefully they'll be i think they put out a joint statement [1:51] today with the european partners that are there alongside our team and obviously in the days [1:56] to come perhaps we can make some progress on including them in that front um so that was the [2:01] the main focus today of the talks was about the middle east and about ukraine and i thought it was [2:05] a good meeting and we'll see many of them uh in december in durant mr secretary uh your counterpart [2:13] at the department of war he had defended himself against the articles of impeachment i wonder if you can [2:20] confidently say the secretary headsets actions and orders on the iran war on drug boat strikes on the [2:26] capture of maduro on actions against yemen have been entirely lawful yeah the president united states [2:33] is the commander-in-chief and he has a right to defend this country and to address imminent threats [2:38] that pose a threat to the united states and he's done so i don't know how anyone could argue that drug [2:42] dealers trying to import poison into our country is not an imminent threat it's a real and imminent [2:46] threat and it's been addressed we've discussed iran extensively and the threat they've posed to the [2:51] united states not in the last year since 1979 a threat that's grown in the case of nicholas maduro that [2:57] was in many cases a law enforcement operation because he was a fugitive of american justice who [3:01] was captured and brought to justice and by the way had the ancillary uh impact of also opening and paving [3:07] the path for venezuela to have a better future um so as i said the the on all those things not only [3:14] that the pete execute on a direct order from the commander-in-chief in our constitution is is empowered [3:20] and trusted with the job of keeping americans safe but they did it quite effectively on all those fronts [3:26] just the secretary on that man you said that there's no need for any major military campaign [3:32] right now because the blockade is working not just the blockade sanctions yeah they're truly devastating [3:38] um so where does that leave us status quo no not status quo the economic pressure is going to get [3:45] even worse i mean understand that these sanctions begin to compound so for example iran still has a small [3:50] number of just a handful of barrels of oil left on the water that got past the blockade when there was the [3:56] mou and that brief ceasefire period once that dries up almost all of their oil revenue will dry up [4:01] there's other sanctions of asians tools that they're choosing like there's other things that [4:04] iran is trying to do to get around the sanctions but scott besson and the treasury department working [4:09] alongside our intelligence agencies and others keep closing those off so the economic pain that is [4:14] being inflicted on iran right now and on that regime is extraordinary and it compounds it's growing [4:19] every day like these sanctions they get worse over time they get more painful as time goes on [4:24] and it's all brought about by the fact that this radical regime of lunatics is imposing this on [4:28] their own people they're destroying their own country in how they're doing it and it's been so [4:32] effective you know the president has taken the time he's consulted with regional leaders he's heard [4:36] input from people throughout the middle east and around the world and based on the input he's getting [4:40] from all of our partners in the region and beyond it's clear that at this time there's no need for [4:44] major combat operations because the economic campaign that's being waged by the department of treasury [4:51] alongside others is devastating it's going very well there's no need to disrupt that at this [4:55] point so what does that leave room for does that leave room for negotiations i mean you think with [5:00] this economic devastation iran is ready to come back to the negotiating table oh i think iran would [5:06] iran would love a deal the problem is the conditions they continue to place are absurd like they're not [5:10] even serious right now so but that could change certainly i mean the pain that they're feeling is [5:14] eventually you have to eat eventually you have to be able to pay your own fighters and your own security [5:18] forces and so forth eventually the economic realities penetrate the skull of even the most [5:23] radical lunatic so i think as time goes on i mean that that will have an impact but um yeah the u.s [5:29] always stands ready if there's a real deal to be done we're open and there's countries out there that [5:33] are engaged the qataris were in washington yesterday the prime minister met with the president we've had [5:37] discussions with them ongoing and they and other countries continue to try to act as mediaries trying [5:41] to float ideas back and forth we're not discouraging them from doing it you know if there's a deal to be [5:46] done it the president will be the first one to be in favor of it but it's not going to be a stupid [5:49] deal it's not going to be a bad deal otherwise we'll you know they'll just continue to impoverish [5:53] themselves how can you describe the differences at the moment between the point of view for the [5:59] u.s and the european partners regarding the war in ukraine the differences between the point of view [6:06] i don't think there's a difference i mean i think we have the same interest in mind and [6:09] it's two our goals are the same we want the war to end and we want there never to be a war again [6:13] so that requires the not just ending the war but also ensuring that ukraine never again feels [6:19] threatened for its security we all share the same goal and then the question is how do you construct [6:23] that how do you come up with something that achieves both of those goals and they're interrelated [6:27] so i think we share the same goal and i think the one thing i would point to is that [6:31] and i heard from my colleagues there's always this concern in europe that they're going to be left out [6:34] that america's going to cut some deal with russia and leaves europe out of the equation well europe's at [6:38] the table they're with us they're right alongside us they've got representatives there are five [6:43] countries in the eu that are in abu dhabi as we speak and as our negotiators have made clear we [6:48] think the trilateral should eventually include our european partners at the table as well because they [6:53] are a part of solving this problem for the long term [6:58] it sounds a bit like you're making an argument in the middle east for the status quo and i mean you [7:03] mentioned you're a gold ally but what i've heard repeatedly one of the worst scenarios is they want [7:09] a diplomatic solution and it's devastating to them economically to help the insecurity of the current [7:16] situation so what would you say oh it's not the status quo because the economic pain we're imposing on [7:20] iran will get worse not better in essence it's going to continue to increment so it's not going [7:25] to be it's going to be worse for iran in a month and in two months and in three months than it is now [7:34] yeah i mean right now i mean look we're not going to pay iran you know is demanding reparations they [7:39] should be the ones paying reparations because they're the ones that have you know destabilized [7:43] the region for long periods of time uh they're demanding pallets of cash which the president's [7:47] made clear is not going to happen uh if they want a nuclear energy program they should have one like [7:52] many other countries around the world have so there's things they can do and can but just right [7:56] now they just don't seem you know at that point now i think they want a deal there's no doubt they'd [8:00] like a deal too but they're just not ready to make one apparently but we're open to a little [8:03] changes but i don't think status quo is the right way to phrase this a status quo means that things [8:07] are going to stay static they're not they're going to continue to grow what i'm saying to you is [8:11] that the economic campaign is so devastating that right now there really is no need for major combat [8:16] operations the president has basically said that over the last few days and that's what i told our [8:21] allies here today well i don't know we haven't heard that their economies are devastated their oil is [8:34] getting out i mean we can and in fact we encourage other countries to join us in the effort to protect [8:39] shipping in the end the iranians are still launching you know a couple drones a night trying to sink [8:43] commercial vessels but oil is getting out on some nights it's you know 80 85 percent of what was [8:49] getting out pre-conflict and the reason why it's not 100 is because the iranian oil is not getting [8:53] out the only oil that's not getting out consistently through the streets of hormuz is iranian oil now [8:58] it'd be better if they weren't having a handful of drones fired at them every other day but we'll [9:02] continue to defend and we've actually encouraged our partners to join us in the effort of defending global [9:06] shipping we shouldn't have to defend global shipping but in this particular case because the irgc is is [9:13] intent upon trying to you know sink these ships we'll continue to do that and been doing it quite [9:17] effectively given the uh given the history of iran lashing out of his neighbors that the economic [9:24] sanctions and the blockade having a real bite on their economy will cause them again to lash out [9:30] against civilian infrastructure i mean if they if they do that then they'll pay a terrible price i mean [9:34] if iran decides to escalate and they decide to initiate military action i don't need to tell you what [9:39] will happen as a result of it all i'm saying to you is that right now the economic pressure on iran [9:43] is so devastating and is working so well that the president's concluded that for the time being [9:48] there's no need for major combat operations because we're achieving the same objective [9:51] through economic means while we defend shipping and we impose the blockade which is like a historic [9:56] blockade no one's ever seen anything like it israelis every very how about the israelis agree with i [10:01] mean i don't i don't know what their viewpoint is on it in this regard obviously the and i'm not going to [10:05] speak for the israeli government i'm telling you what the american position is did you get any kind [10:11] of a response on what i mean from the g7 when you raised this with presumably the french and the [10:17] germans and the italians the idea of helping on the on the street no i raised it i didn't get a response [10:23] no okay so they're still stuck in the well i think part of the challenge yeah look i mean part of the [10:28] challenge we have is there's countries out there that say well we're ready to provide forces to help [10:33] defend shipping once there's no risk of conflict but if there was risk of conflict we wouldn't [10:37] need them so it's kind of a catch-22 look we're going to continue to do it we've done it quite [10:41] effectively we think it's in their interest frankly we think it's in the interest of the world to [10:45] protect shipping because the u.s doesn't get any oil from there that's our we don't rely on middle east [10:50] energy to for our own economy so i think these countries should step up i think a couple of [10:54] thinking about it to be honest but you didn't get anything well i don't think the foreign ministers are in [10:58] a position to make those commitments to be honest those are probably would have to be made by the heads of [11:02] their government so why do you find saying the russian the russian negotiators in abu dhabi thus [11:07] far that they are serious about bringing you know the commitment to bringing them to the world well [11:12] that's what we're testing obviously that's i mean we're it's good that they're there that's what we're [11:16] testing i'm just informing i'm not there in abu dhabi so i can't speak to their body language or their [11:21] attitude towards it all i can say is they showed up they're there they agreed that the trilateral [11:25] and and i'm reporting to you that you know our european allies who are so involved in this and care a lot [11:30] about it we're there as well they're not at the table yet but we think they should be and i think [11:34] this trilateral eventually will be expanded to include them in order to arrive at a final [11:39] agreement here sorry just back to iran why is it staling on the iran war beneficial to the united [11:44] states it's not a stalemate you call it a stalemate i know it's not a stalemate how is it a stalemate the [11:48] united states is imposing extraordinary damaging uh effects through our sanctions and other measures in [11:54] the blockade on the iranian uh economy that every month continues to collapse what is their inflation [12:00] rate is at three or four hundred percent now i don't know how that's a stalemate they're bleeding [12:04] they're bleeding economically well we're open to diplomacy you're asking me what's happening [12:10] today and i'm telling you that the iranian demands are totally unrealistic we expect that [12:13] could change and if it does we'll be prepared for diplomacy and all i'm saying and and on the [12:18] economic front is we don't need to conduct military strikes if we're achieving the same objective [12:22] through economic means and economic pressure but that's not a stalemate that's actually not that's [12:26] the contrary of the stalemate it is an increased pressure on iran that continues to grow every [12:31] day if you put a sanction on them today it hurts but it hurts more and more as every day goes by [12:36] because they're losing money every day and that begins to compound so that's not a stalemate on [12:40] the contrary that's growing pressure on them that this economic pressure is putting how does that [12:44] further you mean their nuclear program well they need money for a nuclear program they need money in order [12:48] to fund terrorism they for everything they do around the world be it their support of hamas hezbollah [12:53] the mashiach militias their efforts to kill people all over the world their cyber activities their [12:58] nuclear program all these things cost money the less money they have available to them the less money [13:03] they can use to fund all their malign and nefarious activity is there a threshold [13:08] how unified is the administration no but the president united states makes these decisions [13:16] i mean ultimately our job is to execute now you know on the president's orders now the president [13:21] takes a lot of input from people in his administration he takes input and ideas from our partners and our [13:26] allies around the world to outside experts to the people he talks to but in the end the decision is [13:30] the president and once the president chooses a direction it's our job in this administration to [13:35] execute on the president's direction the iranians have continued to attack shipping going through [13:39] the strait is there a threshold beyond which attacks lead to a military i'm not going to [13:44] speculate on any thresholds the president talked about last night our military is capable and ready [13:49] at any moment if necessary to conduct devastating attacks but we don't see the need for it now because [13:53] the truth of the matter is that the economic pressure we put on them is incredibly effective [13:58] incredibly devastating and we have reason to believe that it's having a true impact on them internally [14:03] and that will play itself out in the weeks and months to come how about china the big gap here [14:07] is the chinese purchases of iranian oil well there won't be much oil to purchasing i mean the only [14:12] oil they can purchase is the oil that's out on the water and there's not much of it left let me ask [14:17] another china question if i may uh can you talk about the state of discussions with the chinese [14:22] on ai guard rails have there been serious talks since the last presidential level there's been you [14:29] expect them to continue yeah after well i think there's been conversation yeah but it should be [14:35] an issue that we raise at the summit i'm sure it'll be an issue among all the leaders are there at apex [14:40] not just the u.s and the chinese on a bilateral basis and i'm certain it'll be a topic at g20 as well [14:45] where the chinese will be present um i know there's been conversations with them sort of at a [14:50] technical level but we don't have anything to announce on it obviously we've heard their perspective [14:55] they've heard ours but that's still a work in progress and what about this client story make [14:59] you concerned about being able to trust the chinese on these issues that they're they're not playing [15:03] straight what do you mean well there are allegations of chinese spying related to trying to acquire uh [15:10] information about nvidia's practices does that color the way you feel about talks with them i think [15:17] well let me just say i think that the chinese system is always going to act in the best interest of [15:22] the chinese system and the united states will always act in the best interest of the united [15:25] states so we're going to do whatever it takes i work for the american people the president represents [15:29] and work for the american people we are always going to be on the american side of every issue [15:33] now we understand the chinese are going to be on the chinese side of every issue the difference [15:37] between this president and previous administrations is sometimes other presidents forgot and other [15:42] administrations and other people in the role that i play now have forgotten that we work for america we [15:46] don't work for the global order we don't work for other countries we work for the united states [15:51] and so on policy matters such as this or anything other whether it's our bilateral relation with [15:55] the country the status of ai we are always going to be in favor of what's good for america and [15:59] americans beyond and above everything else and that will often put us in conflict or in disagreement [16:04] with other countries including china so we're realistic and open-eyed about it but i work for america [16:10] we're always going to and the president fights for america and so we're always going to be on the american [16:14] side of every issue what's the status of the uh the um trilateral talks between the us russia and china [16:22] right now trump said those talks might include denuclearization is that something that china is [16:26] open to ahead of his summit well i don't want to characterize what they're open to or not suffice [16:30] it to say that i think there's an intent to have that meeting we're working to organize it and to frame [16:34] it in the appropriate way and hopefully you know we'll have some news for you about that fairly soon [16:38] but i don't have an announcement on it today other than to tell you what's already been stated which is [16:42] that the president wants that meeting to happen if it's possible we think it should be possible [16:46] and that among the topics he believes that should be discussed is the status of nuclear weapons in [16:50] the world which the president thinks its proliferation is very dangerous the egyptian foreign minister was [16:56] uh president today you weighed 320 million dollars of uh military assistance to egypt's weighting [17:05] years since then there's been a very big crackdown on independent journalism in egypt um is that something [17:10] raised with your addiction capital well we didn't discuss it today but egypt is also i mean like [17:15] anything else in foreign policy there's always a balancing act to further the national interest [17:19] of the united states and in the end egypt has been a reliable and good defense partner of the united [17:24] states uh every you know we've made requests of them in the past that are key to our national security [17:29] and they've complied and so i think decisions that we make reflect that that doesn't mean you agree [17:34] with everything another government does you may have and i'm not opining about the journalists i'm just [17:39] saying in general there may be things you don't agree with but at the end of the day when you make [17:43] a mature foreign policy it requires you to balance those things particularly when a country you've [17:48] made requests of them that are important for us and they've complied with it and so they've proven to [17:52] be you know good reliable partners on a number of fronts there are reports that the u.s evacuated some [17:58] military aircraft from another airbase yeah i have to refer you to the department of war on that i mean i saw [18:04] like a headline somewhere about it but i can't comment on the decisions they make other than to say that [18:09] all i will say to you is we're we are constantly repositioning forces around the world for a [18:13] variety of reasons so i don't want to speak to a specific report i have to refer you to the [18:17] department of war on that i've been here so you're going to run um you talked about their bleeding uh [18:23] do you have a timeline for you know how long the iranian regime can hold on and if the end game [18:29] regime collapse or does the regime come to the table with that no the i think the way to look at it is you [18:34] you do bad things bad things will happen to you that's the way to read it and at the end of the [18:38] bad things are happening to the iranian economy and it's unfortunate the people of iran deserve [18:42] better they don't but but it's their own leaders that are imposing this on them you know this is [18:47] not a country that in the past for example when obama gave them sanctions relief they didn't use [18:51] that money to build up hospitals roads bridges and universities they used that money to build weapons [18:55] and arm proxies in the region to attack us and other countries so it's unfortunate that they have to [19:00] be punished for that and that the iranian people ultimately pay the price but that's because [19:04] they have really bad lunatic leaders so um we just have to deal with that reality but you know [19:10] for bad behavior there will be a there'll be consequences there has to be otherwise countries [19:14] wouldn't like these regimes like this will do whatever they want there's been sanctions for many [19:18] years not like these the embargo has been on for quite a few months now like is there a timeline [19:23] no no it hasn't been on for a few months so for example the blockade [19:26] uh that was initiated then it was stopped as part of the mou that they themselves violated [19:31] they violated the mou they they canceled the mou by attacking shipping again so if you look at the [19:36] blockade they got oil out during the mou period that oil that's now on the water is almost out so [19:42] at that point they won't have any revenue so you say sanctions have been in place never has iran ever [19:46] faced the inability to sell energy in the global market like they are today they've never faced this [19:52] and other things that we're doing which i can't discuss that are having a huge impact on them [19:55] economically the mou was the mou a mistake well i think the mou was a good faith effort i guess to [20:02] sort of try to figure out diplomatic means but i think it confirmed for me and for others who you're [20:05] dealing with here in the end they violated the mou they insisted that uh an end to the conflict in [20:12] lebanon before the ceasefire is that one of the demands you consider absurd or is that something [20:17] well why would we negotiate lebanon with iran what does iran have to do with lebanon [20:20] i mean they can claim whatever they want but lebanon is its own country to figure out the [20:26] future of lebanon we'll deal with lebanon not with iran now i think by saying that to you they're [20:31] admitting that they are the ones that are behind hezbollah that has destroyed that country everything [20:35] bad that's happened to lebanon has been the direct result of hezbollah's presence there [20:39] we deal with the lebanese government we deal with president ayun we deal with the lebanese armed [20:43] forces that's who we did an agreement with israel and lebanon with so um why would we talk to iran [20:50] about lebanon it's none of their business well we already we've already been engaged i don't know [20:58] if you've tracked this but we've already been engaged in peace negotiations directly between lebanon and [21:03] the israelis that's created the pilot zones in the south where iran the israelis are pulling back from [21:10] regions and the lab is taking over them and we want we've been on top of that and want that to [21:13] continue to happen we are actively now trying to construct a verification model for that so that [21:18] trusted verifiers can verify that both sides are complying but this is an issue we're going to [21:23] we're going to work as mediators between lebanon and israel not iran iran has no role to play when [21:28] it comes to lebanon other than stop sponsoring and supporting hezbollah because hezbollah has [21:33] done tremendous damage to the state of lebanon and to the people of lebanon [21:36] can you discuss with your saudi counterpart the second front kind of that the uh houthis have [21:42] opened with their attacks on uh aramco on riyadh airport on all of these oh we i mean we didn't [21:48] discuss it here in depth we've discussed it plenty with them quite a bit yeah absolutely i mean and [21:52] we're concerned about that obviously and we and others you know we have defense agreements with [21:56] with uh saudi arabia and we're living up to those commitments and other countries are involved in [22:01] supporting them as well but it's another point to be made if you guys go through the middle east talk about [22:05] all the instability in the middle east houthis the militias in in iraq hezbollah hamas um the [22:14] civil war that occurred in syria that almost destroyed that country uh all of what do these [22:19] things all have in common behind every single one of these destabilizing activities in the middle east [22:24] there's one common denominator the iranian regime they are behind all the instability in the region they [22:29] are the source of instability in the region and i think the countries of the region realize that as [22:33] well saudi arabia others realize it as well but yeah we're troubled by what we see with the houthi [22:38] engagement what's happening with the houthis and it's it's a real problem and i think the saudi's [22:42] know who behind who's behind it it's not ultimately the houthis wouldn't even exist were it not for [22:46] iranian support so um that said it's something we'll continue to help them with and hopefully can be solved [22:52] okay guys let's go home thank you

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →