Try Free

ESCALATION WARNING: Trump's threat to LIGHT UP Iran instantly raises stakes

Fox Business May 9, 2026 9m 1,750 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of ESCALATION WARNING: Trump's threat to LIGHT UP Iran instantly raises stakes from Fox Business, published May 9, 2026. The transcript contains 1,750 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"After these strikes, is the ceasefire with Iran still on? Yeah, it is. They trifled with us today. We blew them away. They trifled. I call that a trifle. I'll let you know when there's no ceasefire. You won't have to know. If there's no ceasefire, you're not going to have to know. You're just going"

[0:01] After these strikes, is the ceasefire with Iran still on? [0:05] Yeah, it is. They trifled with us today. We blew them away. [0:11] They trifled. I call that a trifle. I'll let you know when there's no ceasefire. [0:14] You won't have to know. If there's no ceasefire, you're not going to have to know. [0:18] You're just going to have to look at what big glow coming out of Iran. [0:22] And they better sign their agreement fast. [0:25] President Trump telling reporters the U.S.-Iran ceasefire remains in place [0:29] after an exchange of fire in the Strait of Hormuz. [0:32] The Pentagon confirming three warships were all targeted by Iranian missiles, [0:37] drones and small boats. [0:38] The U.S. military responding by hitting Iranian missile and drone launch sites, [0:43] command and control locations and surveillance equipment. [0:46] U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz saying Iran has created a new agency [0:50] to control shipping in the Strait. Watch this. [0:53] So what are we asking? Cease its attacks on commercial shipping. [0:59] Cease mining and remove its mines from an international waterway. [1:05] Cease tolling, charging illegal tolls in the Strait of Hormuz [1:09] and allow the U.N. to move forward with humanitarian aid, [1:13] life-saving aid through that international corridor. [1:17] Just this week, Iran's own state media announced that the regime has launched [1:23] what it calls the Persian Gulf Straits Authority where it seeks to demand that all ship captains [1:32] from international shipping, commercial shipping, civilian shipping, [1:36] basically have to check in and pay a bribe, pay a toll in order to use these international [1:42] waterways. [1:44] So that doesn't just affect this region. [1:46] It infects the entire world. [1:50] Joining me now, former Trump Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland. [1:55] K.T., you heard Mike Waltz say this, a bribe, a toll. [2:00] This is the Iranians' new strategy. [2:03] Your reaction? [2:04] The Iranians can say all they want. [2:08] They can't pull any of it off. [2:10] They don't control the strait. [2:11] We control the strait. [2:13] American military vessels are going through the strait. [2:16] When Iran, quote, attacks the American vessels, [2:19] it's like a one-off thing. [2:21] These are their little fast boats. [2:22] They're like speed boats. [2:23] They're like the kind of boats that pull water skiers. [2:25] Can we deal with them? [2:27] Yeah. [2:27] That's all that's left of the Iranian Navy. [2:29] It's not an issue of blowing them out of the water. [2:32] So Iran, you know, look, the Iranian people are proud people. [2:35] They're not going to cry uncle. [2:37] They're not going to admit defeat. [2:39] But the fact is, we've won the war. [2:41] We control the strait. [2:43] And now it's just a matter, will they sign on the dotted line? [2:46] And if they don't sign on the dotted line, as President Trump said, he'll use a military option. [2:50] And even if they do sign on the dotted line, there are only two things that matter. [2:54] Can we inspect it? [2:56] Can we guarantee that they're doing it? [2:58] And if they're not, if they're not abiding by the terms of the agreement, then we'll have to punish them. [3:03] So what does that mean? [3:04] There's something called snap inspections. [3:06] Snap means that we can go any time, any place, anywhere in Iran to look at anything we think is suspicious. [3:12] That's never been a part of any deal we've had with Iran. [3:16] And let's say, for example, they agree to that. [3:18] But then inspectors come and Iran says, no, no, not today. [3:21] How about day after tomorrow? [3:23] Then guess what? [3:23] We assume that they're doing something wrong, that they're not abiding by the terms of the agreement, [3:27] when are we blowing up the facility? [3:29] Well, that means then, if what you're saying is correct, and I've heard the Secretary of State say the same thing, [3:35] that, you know, that's all they do with these negotiations, it's passing notes like you're in class, [3:40] because it's just, all they're doing is just stretching out the time frame. [3:43] And they've been doing this for decades, by the way, to the world, [3:46] but especially to past presidents here, not this president right now. [3:50] So here's the question, if the Iranians do sign on, quote, unquote, the dotted line, [3:55] and then they start to renege, our inspectors don't go in for the nuclear inspections, et cetera, [4:03] doesn't that mean that we're going to have prolonged military assets in that region? [4:08] And what does that look like, KT? [4:12] Okay, so I think that initially, yes, we would have to remain in the region. [4:17] There's nothing in this agreement about the United States Armada leaving, I would point out. [4:20] But we would stay in the region for a period of time to make sure that it is being enforced. [4:24] But there are other countries in the region which have a vested interest in making sure [4:29] that Iran abides by it, you know, the Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel. [4:34] So I don't think we would have to have the kind of military presence in the area that we've had [4:40] in the last two or three months. [4:42] We wouldn't have to have that indefinitely, maybe for a little bit of time, [4:45] and then we pass it off and share the responsibility with others in the region who are very capable themselves. [4:50] I want to ask you about what's coming next week. [4:54] So this conflict remains top of mind ahead of President Trump's trip to Beijing next week. [4:58] Reportedly, he wants to end the conflict before he meets with Xi Jinping. [5:02] Watch this, KT. [5:03] A very good relationship with President Xi. [5:09] He's a, you know, I find him to be a tremendous guy and we get along well and do, we're doing [5:16] a lot of business with China and making a lot of money. [5:19] He's been very nice about this. [5:20] You know, in all fairness, he gets like 60% of his oil from Hormoz. [5:25] And he's been, I think he's been very respectful. [5:28] We haven't been challenged by China. [5:30] They don't challenge us. [5:31] And he wouldn't do that. [5:34] So President Trump's visit follows the Iranian foreign minister's meeting with top Chinese diplomats that happened earlier this week. [5:41] And China reportedly is urging Iran to pursue diplomacy and avoid resuming hostilities as it seeks to position itself as a mediator in the conflict. [5:49] So, KT, what are you expecting? [5:51] Because I can think that, it's hard for me to say China as a mediator, but at the same time, which I think is not true, but at the same time, I can think of a million barrels of oil as to why they want to mediate this conflict and see it end. [6:04] What happened last week is that the Chinese officials told the Iranian officials settle this deal now. [6:12] We don't really care about your nuclear ambitions. [6:15] What we care about is all that oil flowing. [6:17] It's not just oil from Iran. [6:19] It's the entire region, as the president just said. [6:21] It's oil from the United Arab Emirates, from the Saudis, from Iraq, from Iran. [6:25] And it does represent about half of Iran, of China's imported energy. [6:30] And it probably all together in China's whole energy mix, that's probably 20%, 10 to 15 to 20% of China's total energy needs, which they're not getting right now. [6:40] So, I think what happens next week is that President Trump and President Xi sit down and say, okay, we're the adults in the room. [6:46] How are we going to deal with this? [6:48] And President Trump will say, no nuclear weapons for Iran. [6:51] And President Xi will say, okay, here's what we need to do to get Iran back in the box. [6:57] And I think that the pressure that Iran will be receiving, on the receiving end from China will be significant. [7:03] China needs that straight open. [7:05] We want that straight open. [7:06] And the roadblock is Iran. [7:08] And the roadblock is Iran. [7:08] Absolutely. [7:09] Absolutely. [7:09] I've got Chris Johnson on the side. [7:10] He's got a question for you. [7:11] Energy policy is his focus. [7:13] Chris, go ahead. [7:13] Right. [7:14] And because we're a net exporter now, and the energy dominance agenda is so big, we obviously are coming from a place of strength in these negotiations. [7:21] But people, there are some folks that are saying President Trump should not go to China because we need to focus on the Iran conflict. [7:27] Obviously, these are intertwined issues. [7:30] You see where China is obviously closely tied to Iran. [7:33] So I would just love to hear your take on the value of President Trump going over and doing these negotiations in China, even if the war is ongoing. [7:40] No, I think it's important to go because the wars aren't going, because the Chinese could help us put pressure on Iran and end it. [7:50] You know, but there's a bigger, I think the bigger issue, though, about Iran and China and energy and us is that President Trump's long-range vision is that the United States is, as you say, dominant, but really dominant from 75% of the world's energy. [8:05] So what would that mean? [8:06] I mean, we now have American energy, oil and natural gas. [8:09] We're the dominant, you know, the major world's exporter. [8:11] We now control Venezuela. [8:13] We have friends in the Gulf region, the United Arab Emirates and the other OPEC members. [8:19] We don't dominate them, but they're close friends of ours. [8:21] And if it got to the point where Iran, if we had a post-war Iran, which was favorable to the United States in energy, we would really dominate 75, 80% of the world's energy. [8:33] And I think that's the long-range goal because as you guys have been talking about all morning, [8:37] it's all about artificial intelligence, the future of the world, quantum computing, all requires a lot of energy. [8:44] And if we're the country that has all the energy and all the tech, we dominate the future. [8:49] Yeah, to pick up on Chris's point, we, as a nation, the United States of America, [8:54] exported a record amount of oil last week, 6.4 million barrels a day. [9:00] That is what we are doing in this country. [9:01] And that's what President Trump came into office saying, drill, baby, drill. [9:05] And it's happening, that U.S. production is ramping up. [9:07] And that's why they're meeting with all the energy executives, Exxon, Chevron, [9:11] to make sure that we are energy independent, but we're also more of a net exporter than we are right now. [9:17] It's such an incredible time. [9:19] Katie McFarland, it's always great to speak with you. [9:21] Thank you for being here. [9:24] It's a pleasure and an honor. [9:25] Thank you. [9:26] All right.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →