About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Dr. Fauci pleads Fifth over 70x at heated Covid hearing from CNN, published July 31, 2026. The transcript contains 1,779 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Dr. Anthony Fauci, he's invoking the Fifth Amendment in a very contentious Capitol Hill hearing amid questions related to the COVID pandemic response. The Republican chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, issued a subpoena for Fauci, the former head of the..."
[0:00] Dr. Anthony Fauci, he's invoking the Fifth Amendment in a very contentious Capitol Hill
[0:05] hearing amid questions related to the COVID pandemic response. The Republican chair of
[0:11] the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, issued a subpoena for
[0:16] Fauci, the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, to appear
[0:21] before his panel. Fauci and Paul, a trained ophthalmologist, have an acrimonious history,
[0:27] to say the least, with Paul even calling for Fauci to face criminal consequences.
[0:32] Before today's hearing, the committee released more than 1,000 pages of the doctor's personal
[0:36] diary from 2019 to 2022. The entry document Fauci's growing fame at the time, shining a light on his
[0:45] interactions with celebrities and members of the media, including some CNN journalists.
[0:50] The diary also narrates Fauci's escalating concerns about COVID-19 and conflicting relationships
[0:55] with both Trump and Biden administration officials. So let's go live now to CNN and congressional
[1:01] correspondent Lauren Fox on Capitol Hill and CNN's Kevin Liptec at the White House. We also have CNN
[1:07] senior legal analyst Ellie Honig with us as well. Lauren, you caught up with Dr. Fauci's attorney
[1:12] after he was forced to leave this hearing room amid this dispute with the Republican chair of the
[1:16] committee. What did he tell you? Yeah, essentially he was just trying
[1:22] in the room to explain why Dr. Fauci was pleading the fifth. And while he kept talking,
[1:29] it was clear that Rand Paul repeatedly told him that he was not authorized to speak in the committee
[1:35] room, that he could not speak on behalf of his client, and that he wasn't even supposed to be
[1:40] sitting next to him during that committee hearing when he continued to try to speak. He then was
[1:45] kicked out of the room. And that's when I caught up with him. And we were pressing him on what exactly
[1:51] he was trying to say, because we couldn't hear given the fact the microphone wasn't on. And he
[1:55] essentially said that he was just trying to explain why he was pleading the fifth. Here he was with us.
[2:02] Have you ever seen this happen in a congressional hearing?
[2:04] Dr. Fauci has a valid Fifth Amendment privilege, and he has the right to assert it.
[2:09] And that's what you were trying to say? That's what I was trying to tell the committee.
[2:12] And obviously, I've covered a lot of these hearings on Capitol Hill. Very, very tense moment
[2:21] there. And despite the fact that I've covered a number of these hearings, I've even covered a
[2:26] number of really fiery hearings where Senator Rand Paul was the chairman. I have never seen a lawyer
[2:32] of someone kicked out of the room. Obviously, that was an extremely, extremely fiery moment that
[2:38] you saw there repeatedly throughout the last hour and a half. Dr. Fauci has just continued to plead
[2:44] the fifth. Whether that was a question about his time leading the coronavirus response in this country,
[2:50] or whether it was a question that was as simple as what the color of the room was,
[2:55] he continued to argue he was pleading the fifth on the advice of counsel. It was an extremely,
[3:02] extremely tense hearing. Yeah, more than 70 times pleading the fifth. More than 70 times he invoked
[3:07] to his right under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Lauren, stand by. I want to bring
[3:12] Kevin in. How is the White House viewing all of this, specifically the politics of this very
[3:16] dramatic hearing? Yeah, and it's clear that President Trump and people around President Trump
[3:21] view this as a vindication of sorts. They have long viewed Dr. Fauci as a foil for them politically,
[3:28] and certainly for President Trump, who looks back to the year 2020 with a degree of regret in a lot of
[3:35] ways. That was obviously the year he lost a presidential election, and he has blamed it in part on the COVID
[3:41] pandemic. Now, he blames it on the effects that it has had on the economy and on the shutdowns and on just
[3:47] general voter resentment about being locked inside. I think you could also argue that the COVID had the effect of
[3:55] people souring on the president's handling of what was a major crisis for the country, but either way you
[4:02] look at it, COVID in a lot of ways cost the president that election, and he has always sort of looked for
[4:08] someone to blame, and clearly Dr. Fauci was that person. Obviously, they had made that intent known in his
[4:15] years out of office. That was part of why President Biden offered him this pardon, and I think it was evident just
[4:22] listening to the questions from the Republican senators in this hearing that they continue to view
[4:28] this as a political cudgel. You know, you heard the Senator Bernie Moreno say that he hoped that voters
[4:34] would see clips from this hearing and that it would sway their own votes in future elections, just I think
[4:41] underscoring how COVID continues to affect the politics of the current day. Now, President Trump earlier this
[4:47] morning did write about Dr. Fauci on Truth Social. He says, one, that more people died of COVID under the
[4:55] Biden administration than the Trump administration, and it is true that the pandemic continued to rage
[5:00] even after he was out of office. He talks about Operation Warp Speed, which was his initiative to get
[5:06] a vaccine developed. It was actually one of the major highlights of his COVID response, but it's not
[5:12] something that he talks about that much anymore. And then he goes on to say, quote, I inherited Fauci,
[5:18] who was there since the 1980s, but with each passing day relied less and less on him. He made too many bad
[5:24] calls, like on masks. And that's true. You know, at the very beginning of the COVID pandemic, the
[5:30] president and Dr. Fauci had a fairly good relationship. He talked about him as a major television
[5:36] celebrity. But as time went on, it really did start to sour so much that by the end of the
[5:43] president's terms, they were barely on speaking terms. And you saw that reflected in Fauci's diaries
[5:48] as well, when he called the president out of control, a true embarrassment, an idiot, and all
[5:54] those sorts of things. And so as the president pulled before this congressional committee to have to
[6:05] invoke the Fifth Amendment repeatedly, which I think in the president's eyes is an admission,
[6:10] something of guilt. Of course, it is not. But it is, I think, in their view, something of an
[6:15] embarrassment for this figure who they have long blamed for the president's downfall in some ways.
[6:21] And let's talk a little bit more about that. The fact that Dr. Fauci pleaded the Fifth Amendment
[6:25] more than 70 times this morning. I want to bring in Ellie Honig on that point. Ellie,
[6:30] you heard Senator Hawley trying to make the case that he doesn't have the right to invoke the Fifth,
[6:36] given his preemptive pardon from President Biden. What did you make of that?
[6:40] So Senator Hawley's actually making the opposite argument there. He cited that Supreme Court case
[6:46] from 1896, and here's why. So if there was no pardon, for sure, Dr. Fauci would have the right
[6:53] to take the Fifth. The complicating factor is he does have this pardon. And so he cannot take the Fifth
[6:59] for anything that might be covered by the pardon. That's what the case that Josh Hawley cites
[7:04] says. But the reason Fauci can take the Fifth here is because he's concerned about potential
[7:10] charges that fall outside the scope of that pardon. Two things in particular. One, the
[7:16] pardon from President Biden would only cover Dr. Fauci for potential federal crimes. But Dr. Fauci
[7:22] could still be charged for state crimes. In fact, a few minutes ago, we just heard Senator Moody
[7:27] from Florida say that there is a state level grand jury looking at Dr. Fauci. So he can invoke
[7:33] the Fifth on that basis. The other thing is, the pardon was issued by President Biden on
[7:38] his last full day in office, January 19th of 2025, and only covers conduct up to that date.
[7:45] So Dr. Fauci can still be charged with federal crimes or state crimes that happened after that
[7:51] date, up to and including today. So the case Senator Hawley cites really makes my point,
[7:57] which is he cannot take the Fifth for things that are within the pardon, but he certainly
[8:01] can take Fifth if he has exposure outside of the pardon, which he certainly does.
[8:06] Good point. And Lauren, let me go back to you. Do you have any sense at all of how Republicans
[8:11] on the committee may now move forward with possibly trying to punish Dr. Fauci for invoking his Fifth
[8:18] Amendment rights? Yeah, I actually asked Senator Rand, excuse me, Senator Ron Johnson about that
[8:25] when he came out of the hearing room. He said, ultimately, it's going to be up to the Chairman
[8:30] Rand Paul. But you heard there in the early part of this hearing that Paul made clear there would be
[8:35] quote, repercussions for declaring that he was pleading the Fifth today. And so I do think that
[8:41] Republicans are going to be looking really closely about whether or not they can try and bring some
[8:46] kind of case that he is impeding a congressional investigation. I do think that Ellie's point is
[8:53] a good one, which is essentially he was concerned today. Dr. Fauci was that coming before this committee
[9:00] hearing, given what Senator Paul has said about wanting him imprisoned in the past could potentially
[9:05] put him in a situation where every single thing that he said, every question he answered would be
[9:11] poured over. And perhaps there would be some kind of gray area that he worried about that Senator Paul
[9:17] would try to use to argue that he had lied to a congressional committee, which of course, also is
[9:21] a crime. So that is sort of the context that all of this is transpiring. And I will note that Fauci was
[9:27] very clear. He has come before Congress more than 200 times during his career, and that he's always been happy to
[9:33] answer questions. He said it was with deep regret that he wasn't answering them today. But he did point
[9:38] out that he was extremely concerned that given some of the statements that Senator Paul, Chairman Paul
[9:42] has made in the past, it was just legally very precarious to move forward with answering congressional
[9:48] questions today.