Try Free

'Did You Present An ID?': John Kennedy Grills Judge Nominee About Voter ID Laws

Forbes Breaking News November 6, 2026 5m 735 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of 'Did You Present An ID?': John Kennedy Grills Judge Nominee About Voter ID Laws from Forbes Breaking News, published November 6, 2026. The transcript contains 735 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Mr. Ossetti, well, first, congratulations to all of you. You used to work at Brown Cave? Yes, Senator. It's in St. Louis. That's their main office. Yes, one of the largest offices in St. Louis. It's like a merge with a British firm now, so it used to be in St. Louis. Now it's all over the place...."

[0:10] Mr. Ossetti, well, first, congratulations to all of you. [0:19] You used to work at Brown Cave? [0:23] Yes, Senator. [0:24] It's in St. Louis. That's their main office. [0:27] Yes, one of the largest offices in St. Louis. [0:29] It's like a merge with a British firm now, so it used to be in St. Louis. [0:33] Now it's all over the place. [0:34] Yeah, well, that's a good sign. [0:37] Brown Cave doesn't hire dummies, do they? [0:41] I don't think so. [0:43] No, one of my best friends from law school is the senior partner there, John Shaper Cotter. [0:54] He'd have met a great judge if I'd have gotten here earlier. [0:58] I'd have done my best to get him on the bench. [1:01] You're at Civil Rights now, right? Civil Rights Division? [1:05] Yes, Senator. [1:06] Okay. I want to follow up on the points made by my good friend, Senator Durbin. [1:18] I'm trying to understand the argument, legal argument, against voter ID. [1:34] Suppose I filed a federal lawsuit and I said it is unconstitutional to require anyone who wants to vote to have to present an ID. [1:54] It is un-American. It's arrogant. [1:59] It's the government saying they don't trust me. [2:03] I'm an American citizen. [2:05] I'm entitled to be trusted. [2:08] And if I say I am who I am, you have to take my word for it. [2:14] Suppose I filed that lawsuit. [2:21] What do you think the judge would do based on the law? [2:23] Well, in my experience as a litigator, those kind of measures, like in 2022 in Missouri, that kind of was the argument. [2:35] Folks thought it was going to be burdensome to have a voter ID or have to show their ID. [2:40] But one of the things that we pointed out in that litigation is that IDs are used for many different things. [2:45] I mean, you can't even travel in an airplane. [2:47] You can't even come into some buildings, certainly not to the Department of Justice. [2:51] And frankly, there were also alternatives. [2:55] You could vote through a provisional ballot. [2:57] You could provide other forms of ID. [3:00] You can sign a certification. [3:02] There were other less burdensome measures, if that was the argument, not saying we accepted it or not, [3:06] that courts will weigh in deciding whether or not those measures are constitutional or not. [3:11] But ultimately, the courts are very deferential and considerate to the state's sovereignty to enact its own laws. [3:18] And so long as it doesn't infringe on a federal constitutional right, they tend to uphold those laws. [3:25] And I think that's kind of been the trend over the last few years. [3:28] You, of course, have voted before, have you not? [3:31] I have, Senator. [3:32] Very fortunate. [3:33] Did you present an ID? [3:36] I did, Senator. [3:37] And how long did that take for them to confirm, look at your ID? [3:42] I want to say probably like a minute, maybe less. [3:47] Okay. [3:48] And if you hadn't had your ID, would they have said, go away, you can't vote? [4:05] Would they have, in Louisiana, if you don't have your ID, you can fill out an affidavit? [4:11] Right. [4:12] Is that the case? [4:13] So it varies by state. [4:15] But in my experience in Missouri, you can vote what's called a provisional ballot. [4:19] And you fill out this form and you can track, you know, your ballot. [4:23] But they match your voter file. [4:25] They match your signature. [4:26] They match other, you know, once you register to vote, there's other, you know, an address and other identifications that they can match. [4:32] But you can go provisionally. [4:33] Help me understand why that's unfair. [4:42] Why that would inhibit anybody from voting. [4:44] Senator, it's no secret that our country has had past instances. [4:51] Certainly, you know, we had a constitutional amendment to abolish poll taxes and, you know, other... [4:56] They don't have a poll tax. [4:57] Of course not. [4:58] But my point is, I think folks try to equate a lot of those common sense measures that we have today to those very draconian and racially discriminatory measures. [5:08] And I just don't think that's a fair characterization. [5:10] So it's largely, I think, a subset of that. [5:14] But again, I think it's a very common sense measure. [5:17] It's very easy. [5:17] And I think the state of Missouri makes it very easy to vote. [5:22] And it's harder to cheat. [5:24] Okay. [5:25] All right. [5:25] I'm sorry. [5:25] I'm out of time, gentlemen. [5:27] I didn't get to you. [5:28] I think Senator Hawley, I mean, Senator Blumenthal is next.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →