Try Free

Debate roundup: Trump vs. Kimmel in free speech clash

May 2, 2026 32m 6,527 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Debate roundup: Trump vs. Kimmel in free speech clash, published May 2, 2026. The transcript contains 6,527 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Do you think that this time is different? Well, I think certainly Donald Trump hopes it's different because this is his opportunity to actually try to win this fight. I mean, there's nothing that enrages him more than being beaten. And that's exactly what happened last fall, which you're referring..."

[0:00] Do you think that this time is different? [0:03] Well, I think certainly Donald Trump hopes it's different [0:05] because this is his opportunity to actually try to win this fight. [0:09] I mean, there's nothing that enrages him more than being beaten. [0:14] And that's exactly what happened last fall, which you're referring to, [0:17] which is that after attempting, after the FCC sort of jawboned ABC [0:24] into trying to get Kimmel off the air, they did so for a week. [0:28] And then he was, after a massive backlash, he was brought back on. [0:33] And that was the first really, I don't know if it was the first, [0:36] but it was one of the most important moments when Donald Trump was trying to go after [0:41] not only the media, but law firms and higher education [0:45] when there was a real backlash and he was unsuccessful. [0:49] And I think that that, I don't think, I mean, I talk to people around him [0:52] that he is very eager to undo that defeat. [0:57] And he wants another, he wants another shot at Kimmel. [1:00] And he, you know, he was obviously upset about what he said, [1:06] but that was such, I mean, I don't think that it was an actual fear of, [1:10] that he was, he was calling for violence. [1:14] Yeah, I mean, look, I... [1:17] It's amazing that we sit at this table and everything is Donald Trump's fault. [1:22] And when you call and put up a picture of the first lady [1:26] and you laugh about her being a widow and her husband being killed, [1:29] who's already been shot, that somehow that is Donald Trump's fault [1:33] and he's mean to Jimmy Kimmel. [1:35] And once Jimmy Kimmel's gone, I don't know who you've talked to the White House. [1:37] I'm around the White House. [1:38] I promise you a lot more than you are. [1:40] The president has not talked about this at all. [1:43] Well, I also... [1:43] At all. [1:44] Like, it's on the list of things he gives you know what about, [1:47] it's down here. [1:48] But when you go on TV... [1:49] The thing that he sent a true social post about this guy? [1:51] After it was said, you can respond. [1:54] And by the way, if this was a joke, [1:55] Jimmy Kimmel could have immediately been a comedian and said, [1:58] hey, in light of what happened tonight, [2:01] that was a joke I apologize for and I'm sorry. [2:03] Because a rogue comedian would say... [2:04] But he didn't. [2:05] And you want to... [2:06] No, you would do it immediately. [2:07] At Twitter, I can tweet right now on your show. [2:09] But hold on. [2:09] I think the question I have... [2:10] He knows he's not going to get fired. [2:12] But he wanted her to be a way to respond. [2:14] Do you think he was referring to Donald Trump [2:16] being murdered? [2:18] Or do you think that he was referring to a 56-year-old woman [2:20] who was married to an 80-something-year-old man? [2:22] I think when you've been shot at three times [2:24] and now this being the third and four different times [2:26] he would try to kill you, yeah. [2:27] I'm going to go out there and say Jimmy Kimmel's a smart guy [2:29] and I think he's saying a widow [2:31] and I think the audience laughed that way. [2:32] They weren't laughing at an age joke. [2:34] I'm not going to try to be clairvoyant about what Jimmy Kimmel meant. [2:36] It's a weak stretch. [2:38] But I will say that we played the lead up to the joke [2:42] so that you could hear the rest of the context. [2:45] Look, I'm not saying you need to like the joke, [2:48] but the rest of the joke was the president... [2:51] What if something were to happen to the president tonight? [2:53] Is there a doctor in the house or Jesus? [2:54] We've been here before several times, though, Jimmy Kimmel. [2:57] I mean, I think the first lady... [2:59] He's a comedian. [2:59] He's a comedian. [3:00] He's a comedian. [3:01] No, he's not a lot. [3:02] He's crossing the line. [3:03] You guys are totally crossing the line on what he's not like. [3:06] It doesn't matter. [3:07] It's a First Amendment issue. [3:09] I'm not arcing First Amendment. [3:11] He can say what he once said, but it's a public airway. [3:13] Hold on a second. [3:14] ABC should fire him. [3:16] ABC should fire him. [3:17] The first lady is right. [3:18] If I made that joke... [3:19] That's not an FEC interaction. [3:20] That is what ABC should be doing. [3:22] If I made that joke on my show joking, [3:24] I would be fired as I should be, [3:26] especially if someone tried to kill that person. [3:28] I didn't apologize immediately. [3:30] Charles. [3:30] Donald Trump posts mock violence on his true social before that Twitter. [3:36] So therefore, got it. [3:38] So can you stop talking for just half a second? [3:41] That would be great. [3:42] All the time. [3:45] And we take it as a joke. [3:46] He posted a video of him beating up CNN in 2017. [3:53] You retweeted that and said, isn't this funny? [3:57] So it's a joke then when he is doing the violence, [4:00] but not... [4:02] If we're going to go back to that, let's go back to it. [4:04] Was he doing it in response to something that CNN had said [4:07] and it turned into a back and forth? [4:09] It literally doesn't matter. [4:09] That's different than talking about someone who's been shot. [4:12] It literally doesn't matter. [4:13] If I made a joke about someone, you being a widower tonight, [4:16] and then someone took a shot at you, [4:18] would you think that was a joke? [4:19] No. [4:19] It's about protecting speech, not popular speech. [4:22] I'm not saying that you don't have the right to say something stupid. [4:25] That is not popular. [4:25] You get to say dumb things. [4:27] It doesn't mean that a corporation has to employ you. [4:29] Exactly. [4:30] And they can choose to employ him or not. [4:32] And they can choose to keep him. [4:34] And Melania Trump and Donald Trump have the right to object to what he has said. [4:39] All of that is free speech. [4:40] That is how it works. [4:42] The idea that he wants to put pressure on the network to get rid of him [4:46] because he doesn't like the speech, [4:48] that steps out of his space. [4:49] He doesn't like people making jokes about his wife being a widow [4:51] after people are trying to kill him. [4:53] He's been enormously successful going after the media in a variety of different ways. [4:56] Who's gotten fired because of him? [4:57] Give me a list. [5:00] Are you familiar? [5:00] No one. [5:01] Who big has he talked about that's been fired? [5:04] Stephen Colbert. [5:05] Stephen Colbert hasn't been fired. [5:06] We saw on the show and y'all said it was because of the economics of TV. [5:09] That was the entire discussion. [5:10] You said that. [5:11] I said he was, no, I did not say that. [5:14] I said that no one was watching in England in half the country. [5:18] Do you think that Donald Trump has not put an enormous amount of pressure on media organizations? [5:24] Was he being feted by David Ellison at a private dinner just a few days before the- [5:29] Barack Obama, when he was president, met with all those guys, too. [5:31] I mean, how many presidents meet with CEOs of almost every company out there? [5:36] Which deal? [5:37] Which deal? [5:38] In a way that presidents don't do and should not do. [5:40] And also, was there a massive corporate deal? [5:42] Wow. [5:43] Okay, this is a new standard. [5:44] We'll go back and look at the Obama books. [5:45] I think it was appropriate for him to be meeting with the CEO of a company that has an active [5:51] merger that's going to go before his administration, where he's the CEO-in-chief. [5:55] All administrations meet with the leaders of companies when there's, especially- [5:58] You have no idea what you're talking about. [5:59] I'm sorry. [6:00] That's not true. [6:01] Go back and look at the Obama years of how many CEOs were at the residence on a continual [6:07] basis. [6:08] Go look at Hunter Biden. [6:09] He was one of his dad. [6:10] We were talking before the break about Trump's tone on Saturday night, and I think he actually [6:15] attempted to strike a measured tone in those moments after the shooting. [6:23] But he came out of a First Amendment dinner where he was excited to roast the press, which [6:28] is totally what he, you know, should have been doing. [6:32] And then Monday morning, here we are, and it's a question of whether the First Amendment [6:37] extends to Jimmy Kimmel, or does it not? [6:42] I don't think we're saying. [6:43] That's not it. [6:44] I think we're saying that ABC should remove him. [6:47] That's not a government-enforced action. [6:49] That is ABC. [6:50] That's their choice. [6:51] Of course it is. [6:52] I'm not arguing that. [6:53] That's their choice. [6:54] ABC has the choice to do it, but I'm suggesting they should. [6:56] And I think advertisers should take note of it, too. [6:59] Well, and he also said he's going to address this tonight. [7:01] I understand what you're saying, that he could have tweeted something quickly, but he said he's [7:03] going to address it tonight on his show. [7:06] But look, I think that we are, it is not right or fair to say that the left, Jimmy Kimmel, [7:12] Democrats are the only ones who are attacking Donald Trump. [7:14] That is simply, he also has a divisive rhetoric, which is why it would be lovely to see the tone [7:20] that we saw from Donald Trump after the White House Correspondent Center. [7:24] He could set the tone for the country as the leader of this country, set the tone. [7:29] I understand things have happened in the past, but there is the future that we have to look [7:32] forward to. [7:33] And he has the power as the president of the United States to actually do a reset, set [7:36] the tone in the right direction. [7:37] Is there a responsibility that lies on anyone else but Donald Trump, that after Donald Trump [7:43] and the multiple assassination attempts, is there a reason, because everything's been [7:46] about Trump responsibility all night. [7:48] Is there any responsibility for Jimmy Kimmel to read the room and realize that, hey, this [7:53] guy's been shot at a couple of times. [7:55] Maybe I shouldn't make a joke about the first lady being a widow? [7:58] Well, Abby, I think this is not what I think he was trying to say. [8:01] Hold on. [8:02] I do think that's a fair question. [8:03] I think this is a fair question for a Jimmy Kimmel, not about what can he do, but about [8:10] taste. [8:11] Right. [8:12] The taste question is the question. [8:13] So to answer his question, I mean, is there a conversation to have that's like, this joke, [8:20] you have a right to say it, but it's in poor taste? [8:22] Yes. [8:23] And also, but here's the thing, you can't, Donald Trump can't give that lesson. [8:28] This is the same person who said, who pushed the conspiracy, first of all, made fun of [8:32] Paul Pelosi for being attacked, who was almost killed, made fun of him for being attacked, [8:36] and then pushed the conspiracy theory that the glass was broken from the outside, from [8:40] the inside out and not from the outside in. [8:43] And the basis of that conspiracy theory was that that was Paul Pelosi's gay lover. [8:48] This is the same person who, when Melissa Hortman was actually assassinated in Minnesota, pushed [8:54] the conspiracy theory by reposting a video on his true social that Governor Tim Walz was [9:00] involved, and the question mark was whether or not he had had her assassinated. [9:04] I understand you don't like Trump, is there any accountability for anybody else in the world [9:07] besides Donald Trump? [9:08] He cannot, and no one defending him cannot tell me anything about civility. [9:12] No, ever. [9:13] Hold on, Ben. [9:14] Hold on a second, Ben. [9:15] I asked Charles to respond to your question. [9:17] He didn't. [9:18] Let me ask you to respond to his. [9:21] When President Trump does the things that he describes, he's shared a video of supporters [9:24] saying the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat. [9:27] He's posted a video showing President Biden hogtied, et cetera, et cetera. [9:31] You could go on and on. [9:33] Is there accountability, responsibility for him to not do those things? [9:38] I go back to what I said at the beginning of the show. [9:40] If I had just been shot at again, had someone trying to kill me again, I think the president's [9:44] rhetoric from the White House in saying we're going to do this dinner, it is important [9:48] to have this dinner, we're going to do this quickly, we're going to come together. [9:52] I saw people coming together. [9:54] That was an incredible moment of unity, but he gets no credit for it. [9:58] I understand that. [9:59] But I go back to the point. [10:00] Well, I mean, my question was... [10:01] So you also didn't answer the question. [10:02] Sure he did. [10:03] I said, he's clearly drunk, unlike you guys who are like, it's all Donald Trump's fault. [10:08] My question was, is there a responsibility for President Trump to not behave the way that [10:14] he has behaved in the past? [10:15] And can you just say, it was wrong, he shouldn't have done it? [10:20] I go back to what I said. [10:21] I think... [10:22] ...for networks to police themselves. [10:23] ABC station owners and advertisers are not clamoring to fire Jimmy Kimmel this time. [10:28] And it seems to suggest that they feel like they've seen this movie before and they think [10:33] these threats are empty or likely to fail. [10:36] Yeah. [10:37] Well, the initial inquiries were sent in March, they were just reported today. [10:39] And it is the FCC's job to see what's happening on the airwaves. [10:43] I just think from ABC's vantage point, it's extremely inconsistent. [10:46] They've had no issue firing Roseanne Barr in two seconds. [10:49] She tried to apologize. [10:50] They said, no way. [10:51] They fired Chris Harrison from The Bachelor because he said, should we fire somebody and [10:55] get rid of her for going to a party when she was a teen? [10:58] And I'd like to remind people too, I mean, when Obama was president, there was literally [11:02] a clown at a rodeo in Missouri who made a joke about Obama getting gored by a bull. [11:09] He got fired. [11:10] So, unless it's Trump, we have a very high standard for what we expect of entertainment employees, [11:15] what we expect in terms of being respectful to the president. [11:19] And I would remind people as well, you know, there was another assassination attempt at [11:23] the Hilton, obviously against Ronald Reagan the last time. [11:27] And after that incident, the country was so shaken. [11:29] Johnny Carson, who was a Democrat, decided to postpone the Oscars because he thought it [11:34] would be inappropriate to be celebrating and cheering when there was such an act of political [11:39] violence. [11:39] And you juxtapose that with Jimmy Kimmel, who continues to double down and ridicule and [11:46] make fun of Melania. [11:48] It would have been so easy for him to say, I screwed up. [11:50] I apologize and take some responsibility. [11:53] And instead, he just wants to continue to victim blame Donald Trump for getting shot at. [11:58] Seriously? [11:59] Although in this particular case, Kimmel would have had to have some prior knowledge of what [12:03] was going to happen in this case, to have something to apologize for. [12:06] Right, but at the time he was unfortunate enough that he might as well have said, you [12:09] know what? [12:09] I'm not sure. [12:10] That was an unfortunate timing. [12:12] I wish that hadn't been said. [12:13] I suppose one could say that, but he also made a joke on Thursday. [12:18] The bad thing that we are all alluding to here happened on Saturday. [12:21] The two are not connected in any meaningful sense. [12:24] And again, what you said earlier is worth repeating. [12:28] The several attacks that have happened directed at Donald Trump are egregious. [12:32] It's shaken me quite a bit, honestly, to think that in the United States, in the year of [12:37] our Lord, 2026, people are taking shots at the president. [12:41] And this is disconcerting. [12:43] At the same time, it doesn't seem appropriate to me that the response from the administration [12:47] is, well, let's start cracking down on everyone who is saying anything directed at the president, [12:52] even if it has no connection whatsoever to an assassination plot. [12:56] That, to me, again, slacks of pettiness. [12:59] It seems vindictive. [13:01] And again, it runs afoul of our laws. [13:03] If there is a legitimate concern about systematic discrimination on the part of broadcasters [13:07] here, the FCC would pretty much have grounds to go after every broadcaster in America related [13:13] to DEI policies. [13:13] Including, by the way, Fox, which has DEI policies. [13:18] Absolutely. [13:18] Just like all the other networks. [13:20] Yeah. [13:20] But anyway, Ellie. [13:21] Private entities have the right to fire people if they want, if they don't like that person's [13:26] speech. [13:26] But the real fundamental question here has to do with governmental power. [13:30] Do we want the FCC policing the content of speech? [13:35] Because that's a totally different thing. [13:36] The First Amendment applies to governmental action. [13:39] It doesn't apply directly to ABC. [13:41] And so if the FCC is throwing its governmental weight around to try to influence speech, to [13:46] try to punish certain speech, that is where the First Amendment is violated. [13:50] Punish, throw your weight around, going back to the first segment. [13:54] When you talk about regulation, the biggest thing that's changed since Ronald Reagan's [13:57] horrible assassination attempt at that same hotel, and we were talking about it in the [14:01] break, is the internet. [14:03] Things now on the internet make us want to hate each other because we're Team Red or Team [14:08] Blue because it makes people literally rich. [14:11] And the government, whether we should or shouldn't regulate, people scream at me from the right [14:15] and from the left. [14:15] We've got to be able to go on the internet and say whatever we want to say. [14:18] That's all right. [14:18] It's the new town square, a la what Tesla guy said. [14:23] What's his name? [14:24] Elon Musk? [14:25] That's right. [14:25] It's the new town square. [14:26] But when you put it in this context, it starts a pattern of what we're talking about, Abby, [14:31] which is, is it overreach? [14:33] Is it regulation? [14:34] Is it folks? [14:35] While, again, and I'll stop, people at home are trying to figure out how to make ends meet. [14:39] They see their government trying to regulate whatever news is. [14:41] Well, I mean, you're making a good point that for a while, it seemed that the free speech [14:47] argument was the argument being made on the right by people like Elon Musk, by people like [14:51] J.D. Vance, who last year went to Europe and lectured them about protecting free speech. [14:57] Listen. [14:58] In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat. [15:07] So I come here today not just with an observation, but with an offer. [15:11] And just as the Biden administration seemed desperate to silence people for speaking their [15:15] minds, so the Trump administration will do precisely the opposite. [15:21] And I hope that we can work together on that. [15:24] In Washington, there is a new sheriff in town. [15:26] And under Donald Trump's leadership, we may disagree with your views, but we will fight [15:32] to defend your right to offer it in the public square. [15:37] Unless you are a late night comedian, Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen Colbert, or frankly, anybody [15:43] who criticizes President Trump, they won't defend your right to say things they disagree [15:47] with then. [15:48] The president is not prosecuting Jimmy Kimmel. [15:51] He's saying he should be fired. [15:52] And that could be his opinion. [15:53] If you if you joked about someone's death, which he believed he did, go ahead, you know, [15:57] criticizing the government doesn't necessarily be in prosecution. [16:00] So he's using the government to bring something that they brought in March of 2025. [16:03] They started this in March of 2025. [16:04] You can use the government's regulatory power. [16:07] I'm not talking just about this, because don't forget, that was the lead. [16:11] Brandon Carr made this threat first last fall. [16:14] So the threat of using the government's regulatory power to police speech and police the actions [16:21] of private corporations, that has been unequivocally put on the table. [16:25] And I'm not the old. [16:26] Hold on. [16:26] Hold on a second. [16:27] As it mentioned, I am not the only letter is about the I'm not the only person saying [16:32] that here's Ted Cruz today. [16:34] He says it is not the government's job to censor. [16:38] I do not believe the FCC should operate as the speech police. [16:43] Ted Cruz. [16:44] He is no. [16:45] He is. [16:46] I would ask you and Ted Cruz. [16:47] Hater. [16:47] He's no rhino. [16:48] Where? [16:48] He believes that this action. [16:51] And he's he was consistent. [16:52] The last action, the last comments by Brandon Carr, he was very clear that he believed that [16:58] that was a clear evidence of jawboning, which is using the threat to coerce speech. [17:03] So it doesn't require that you throw somebody in jail. [17:06] Just the threat of using regulatory power to coerce their actions is what is happening. [17:11] To be clear, the FCC is not threatening to throw anybody in jail. [17:13] It's not that they do. [17:13] Are you denying that Brandon Carr did not issue a threat in the fall to ABC or to Disney that [17:19] they were in a letter in March 2025? [17:22] Joe, simple question. [17:23] Did Brandon Carr in the fall say that he would that he would take a look at Disney's FCC [17:31] licenses because of the comments that Jimmy Kimmel made? [17:34] I don't remember, but I can tell you what I can tell you. [17:37] I can tell you. [17:37] I can tell you. [17:38] Hold on a second. [17:38] I can tell you he did say that. [17:40] So given that he said that, do you acknowledge that that's him using his power as a government [17:46] entity to try to coerce the actions of a private company? [17:50] You are you are trying to stretch something that is on paper that you can read with your [17:54] own eyes and see the chairman's letter involves Disney's DEI policies, which the federal [18:00] and the FCC has been regulating equal employment practices since something like 1968 or 1969. [18:05] Every time a license gets renewed, they have to apply the same standards to everybody. [18:09] And one of those standards is employment practices. [18:12] If Disney has. [18:13] I mean, it's a good question. [18:15] Why are they applying this standard across the board? [18:18] Well, when they get their license renewed, they will. [18:20] Well, hold on. [18:20] If Disney has nothing to hide about their employment practices, why don't they go through you? [18:24] No, Disney's licenses are not up for renewal. [18:26] They're not. [18:26] They're up in 2028. [18:27] Yeah. [18:28] They've expedited the process. [18:29] They are not up for renewal. [18:30] The way we are talking about this at this table, all of us, exposes that this is a pretext [18:35] piled atop another pretext. [18:37] We all know this is not about DEI policies. [18:40] We're not even really talking about it this way. [18:42] We know it's about the content of speech. [18:45] We know it's about the jokes Jimmy Kimmel made. [18:47] We know it's about the kind of things that he says. [18:49] That's what's prompting all of this. [18:51] I would have made it about DEI got interrupted 20 times. [18:53] Which broadcaster hasn't made commitments to do this kind of DEI hiring? [18:57] Disney has a policy that's 50% of their characters. [18:59] Do you know of any broadcaster that hasn't done this? [19:02] Underrepresented groups. [19:03] Do you know of any broadcaster that hasn't made similar commitments since 2020? [19:07] No. [19:07] And when their licenses get renewed, I imagine the FCC isn't up for renewal. [19:10] What we know is that the process was actually expedited here. [19:14] In fact, it seems as though they've expedited the process in the last couple of days. [19:18] Why do you suspect that happened? [19:21] The process began in March of 2025. [19:24] It was done over the last year. [19:26] You pointed out something that happened in the fall. [19:28] So this has been ongoing for over a year. [19:29] I'm asking you why they're expediting now. [19:31] I'm just telling you that there is an ongoing inquiry by the FCC. [19:36] I understand. [19:36] And that Disney has nothing to hide about their DEI policies. [19:39] The answer is not convenient for you. [19:40] I don't think it's in good faith to suggest that things that happened in recent history [19:46] that were big stories at the time didn't happen. [19:49] They happened, right? [19:51] We know that Brendan Carr's threats to Disney were, that was the big story. [19:58] And he was crystal clear about it. [20:00] Even Republicans had to rebuke him. [20:01] And that's why they ultimately backed down and Disney, and they put Jimmy Kimmel back [20:06] on the air. [20:07] So we can't pretend like that didn't happen. [20:09] We can't pretend that that's not the context. [20:11] We also can't pretend that the context isn't that Trump has specifically asked and told [20:18] ABC that they should take Kimmel off the air. [20:21] So all of that, Joe, I mean, if you're being honest. [20:25] You're forgetting that Disney has been in the bulls' lives of the Republican Party since [20:28] Ron DeSantis five years ago. [20:30] I mean, this is not a company that Republicans have shied away from attacking. [20:33] If you're being honest, I think my final question to you, it's just sort of like in [20:37] the last segment when we were talking about this. [20:40] Do you really believe that this is the proper use of the federal government? [20:46] You are a conservative. [20:47] The FCC. [20:49] J.D. Vance said, we will protect your right to say things we don't like. [20:52] Is it the right use of the government for the FCC chairman to threaten a private company [20:58] over speech that the president doesn't like? [21:00] The FCC chairman put in writing a question about the DEI policies, which they have jurisdiction [21:04] to oversee. [21:05] If Disney does not have anything to hide about the DEI policies, go through the review and [21:10] complain. [21:11] Disney, by the way, Disney has said, we're going to comply. [21:13] Disney has said, we're going to comply. [21:14] You're right, chairman. [21:15] We're going to comply. [21:15] If you just divorce this moment from all the other moments in the last eight months, maybe [21:22] you might believe him. [21:23] But there's a lot of history here that points to targeting of ABC over viewpoints that they [21:29] disagree with on their broadcast. [21:30] Yeah, and there's real issues about, you know, the equal time rule, other elements like [21:36] that. [21:38] I don't like the president jawboning. [21:40] I especially don't like the president jawboning when it is keeping Jimmy Kimmel. [21:43] It's the same dynamic that we see with interest rates. [21:46] The more he says we should lower interest rates, you know, the independence of the Fed [21:49] keeps them the same, even when they would probably would have lowered them absent that. [21:54] Jimmy Kimmel would probably be fired if Donald Trump, you know, stopped talking about [21:57] him because I swear to God, this is the only time I ever hear about Jimmy Kimmel. [22:00] I've never heard somebody say, hey, you know what? [22:02] Jimmy Kimmel had a funny joke the other day. [22:04] I've never, ever, ever heard anyone say that. [22:07] I'm tired. [22:08] I'm tired of Jimmy Kimmel. [22:10] Let him fade off into obscurity. [22:11] Let him let his memory be the man show, which somehow has not resulted in his cancellation [22:16] 20 years later. [22:18] Just let him go. [22:19] So, I mean, do you think you think that this is the FCC trying to execute on Trump's [22:26] desire to have Jimmy Kimmel punished? [22:30] I mean, I honestly don't know. [22:31] I mean, there are normal things that occur in the course of reviewing the license. [22:35] Obviously, the rhetoric around this goes above and beyond that. [22:39] If there's any actual action taken, it goes above and beyond that. [22:43] I just, as somebody who actually appreciates the First Amendment, I think the idea of, like, [22:47] allowing Jimmy Kimmel to be a martyr for the First Amendment is something that sickens me. [22:50] Scott? [22:50] Yeah, I did speak to Brendan Carr, too, the other day about this issue, and, you know, [22:55] he had explained that they were already in this early review process, that there is some [22:59] sort of DEI review going on with the licenses. [23:02] It's been going on over time. [23:04] They do have the ability to call them in for an early review. [23:06] I'm not totally steeped in all the bureaucratic processes there. [23:10] But, you know, there's a legitimate thing that the FCC does. [23:13] On the Kimmel piece, I've got to say, I still don't know what the joke is. [23:19] He's not funny. [23:21] Expectant widow. [23:22] I mean, they keep trying to explain that this was a joke, and how can we go after people [23:27] who are just telling jokes? [23:28] I've yet to hear anybody explain to me what's the joke. [23:31] It's not common and illegal again. [23:32] Does it matter whether it was a joke or not? [23:35] Well, they're saying it's a joke. [23:36] Because I don't know that speech has a joke clause. [23:39] And maybe it doesn't, but for them to then, and he's been pretty defensive about it the [23:43] last couple of nights, but for them to say, oh, we're just out here telling jokes, I wish [23:47] somebody could explain to me what is the joke about wish casting the death of the president [23:52] of the United States or anybody else? [23:54] Well, I have two questions for you. [23:56] I mean, one would be, again, it doesn't really matter whether it was a joke or not. [24:02] But secondly, I'm just going to play this, because this is Trump talking at the White House [24:08] on Tuesday about his marriage to Melania. [24:11] Listen. [24:12] And they were married for 63 years. [24:19] And, excuse me, if you don't mind, that's a record we won't be able to match, darling. [24:25] I'm sorry. [24:26] Just not going to work out that way. [24:28] We'll do well, but we're not going to do that well. [24:31] 63 years. [24:35] That was a joke. [24:36] I don't think he's lived to 120. [24:38] That was a joke. [24:38] He is 80. [24:39] He's much younger. [24:40] He's not going to be around forever. [24:42] Kimmel's problem is he's not very funny. [24:44] Kimmel says that that's the point that he was trying to make. [24:46] The morning of, well, the morning of Charlie Kirk's death or the night after, he revealed [24:55] his true, I think, gutter instinct when it comes to Trump. [25:00] He hates Trump so much, Kimmel, that he could, you know, use that platform. [25:04] And he hates, you know, Charlie Kirk's death, his murder on live television, that body was [25:14] still unburied when Kimmel was making jokes. [25:17] And it was so insensitive. [25:19] It doesn't matter if it's sensitive. [25:20] It's the First Amendment. [25:22] It doesn't matter if it's insensitive. [25:24] It doesn't matter if it's funny. [25:25] It's the First Amendment. [25:26] But Trump has said so many insensitive things. [25:27] Yes, but you also can't say profanity on FCC-regulated, you know, channels. [25:33] No, I'm saying there are limitations that are imposed because they're using public spectrum. [25:37] With fines. [25:37] You get fines for those things. [25:39] But you don't get attacked by the president. [25:40] Well, this really just shows is that... [25:42] He can go on a podcast and say all these things. [25:43] He can have a subtext and say all these things. [25:44] He can also say it on public broadcasting. [25:46] Over the past few years, if you even so much as hint that Donald Trump is a fascist, [25:51] Republicans lose their temper, as they so often do. [25:54] Or you put it into a manifesto after you try to assassinate him because you believe that [25:58] he's a fascist and you think that justifies his assassination. [26:01] No, you guys have said that we shouldn't even call Donald Trump a fascist. [26:03] Stochastic terrorism, that's the phrase that you say. [26:04] Then Donald Trump gets into office, he tries to remove comedians from the airwaves, and you [26:08] guys run defense for it. [26:09] Donald Trump tries to make a list of his political opponents that he wants to lock up, like, I [26:14] don't know, Comey, Letitia James. [26:15] He's talking about... [26:16] Dude, I impeached the guy and I'm sitting here talking about him. [26:18] Okay, then... [26:19] Like, you see me in the concentration camps right now. [26:22] No, I'm referring to other... [26:23] You're not in a fascist republic. [26:24] Wait, do you not think he has fascistic tendencies? [26:25] Do you not think that's trying to take... [26:26] I don't think using the term fascist is so fraught. [26:29] No, I don't. [26:30] Donald Trump is taking comedians off the air. [26:32] I don't think it's not a total fascist. [26:33] You're talking about a political, psychological conclusion. [26:35] Hang on, hang on, hang on. [26:36] Well, I'll only interject to say this because we've played it before on the show, but Trump has repeatedly [26:42] called his political opponents fascists, communists, et cetera, et cetera. [26:46] So if, again, if the word fascist in and of itself is so beyond the line, Trump has crossed that line. [26:53] Additionally... [26:53] He has crossed that line. [26:53] It's simplistic rather than beyond the line. [26:56] Listen, my point is that if you're going to use it as an argument to say that Democrats have gone too far, [27:02] the president has gone just as far. [27:05] But hold on, this isn't just... [27:06] I don't disagree with that. [27:07] ...in your rhetoric, it deserves some reflection and concern. [27:10] It's not just about Kimmel. [27:11] Last night, we saw in Texas courts that the case for Alex Jones and Sandy Hook families, [27:16] which has been going on for more than eight years, [27:18] these families have been tortured by this man for over a decade, [27:22] he somehow found a legal loophole made just for him. [27:26] Even lawyers don't totally understand what's happening here. [27:28] And if you're watching this and you're in Texas, you should call your representative [27:32] and ask what the hell is happening with that deal. [27:34] This goes to speech all across the spectrum, [27:38] except for the people that align with the most extreme parts of the right. [27:43] Do you have a vested interest in that case? [27:45] Sorry? [27:45] Do you have a vested interest in the outcome? [27:46] Yeah, my partner owns the onion, but also, do you not want the Sandy Hook families to get their fair share? [27:51] No, I do, I do. [27:52] Because right now, this is the only deal... [27:53] I'm just saying, like, there are other externalities there when it comes to that. [27:57] I like disclosure. [27:59] I like honesty. [27:59] Yes, that's fair. [28:00] And I think the Sandy Hook families deserve every honesty. [28:02] Absolutely. [28:03] All right. [28:03] Absolutely. [28:04] The other moment that a lot of people accused the president of having thin skin about [28:08] was how he reacted to Jimmy Kimmel's joke from last week. [28:13] And here's Joe Rogan criticizing the president for just all that has transpired after that alleged joke. [28:23] Adam Kroll had a really good point. [28:25] He said that joke, he said that joke on a Thursday. [28:27] On Friday, nobody gave a s**t. [28:30] Who? [28:30] Who? [28:30] What? [28:30] Kimmel. [28:32] He said a joke about Melania. [28:33] He made his own mock White House press correspondence dinner. [28:36] Right. [28:36] And he said Melania has the glow of a woman who's recently widowed. [28:40] Okay. [28:41] Just does it. [28:42] It's an old guy joke. [28:43] Like he's going to die soon. [28:44] Yeah. [28:44] It could be. [28:45] Or an assassination joke if you want to take it that way. [28:47] But he is old. [28:48] Wait, after the attempt? [28:50] No, before. [28:50] Before. [28:51] So it's on Thursday. [28:52] And this is Carolla's point. [28:53] That's a really good point. [28:54] He said no one gave a s**t on Friday. [28:55] It came out on Thursday. [28:57] No one cared on Friday. [28:58] No one cared on Saturday until Saturday night when the assassination attempt. [29:02] And then all of a sudden everyone's blaming Kimmel. [29:06] And now it's just been added to this like very tiresome, frankly, longstanding tit for tat between Trump and Kimmel. [29:15] And it just won't, he won't let it go. [29:19] I mean, Kimmel doesn't like him. [29:20] But Trump is the president and he will not let this go. [29:23] Number one, the joke was in poor taste. [29:26] Number two, it's a shame that Jimmy Kimmel can't stand up and apologize for a joke that was in poor taste. [29:32] And third, Adam Carolla makes a decent point that was referenced by Joe Rogan there. [29:38] But no one cared on Thursday because the people who watch Jimmy Kimmel agree with his politics and they probably thought it was a hilarious joke. [29:47] The people who would call him out for being distasteful don't actually watch his program. [29:53] That's why no one said anything until after the fact. [29:57] You know, Pete, can you tell me one example of Trump ever apologizing for anything? [30:03] Can you tell me one example of Trump? [30:05] I don't know why it matters. [30:06] I mean, Jimmy Kimmel made a joke. [30:08] Are you serious? [30:09] Robert Mueller? [30:11] Robert Mueller? [30:12] Are we going to act like that didn't happen on Twitter? [30:13] Can you give me an example of someone's spouse being told you look like some guy or someone else's husband? [30:19] I mean, the point, the point is, is that... [30:23] Trump made jokes about Paul Pelosi implying all kinds of crazy conspiracies about why he was attacked with a hammer. [30:32] The president did that. [30:33] That actually didn't happen. [30:35] And I would also add, I mean, the president earlier this week made a joke to his wife that she's going to outlive him. [30:46] He made the joke in front of the king. [30:47] But every wife makes that joke. [30:49] I think the joke was unkind and unfunny. [30:52] But why make a federal case out of it? [30:54] This whole city lives in fear of Trump's petty angers. [30:59] The entire Senate, the entire Congress does. [31:02] Everyone in the administration, that's why they have to parrot his lies about the 2020 election or whatever he wants from him to say. [31:07] The entire city lives in fear of it because he makes a federal case out of everything. [31:13] And that's the point. [31:15] I mean, it's like, again, nobody... [31:17] You cannot show me an example of Trump ever apologizing for anything. [31:20] So I just think it's rich when any conservative tries to go and say that someone should apologize for anything. [31:26] The point is that the Republican Party ran on a platform... [31:30] I'm speaking. [31:31] The Republican Party ran on a platform... [31:32] I did it to me, so that's okay. [31:33] ...of having free speech. [31:35] That's what you guys campaigned on. [31:36] You went to all the college campuses all around talking about you stood for free speech. [31:42] Now you have the president of the United States being so much of a snowflake that he cannot handle a joke he doesn't like from Jimmy Kimmel. [31:49] That's ridiculous. [31:50] And Jimmy Kimmel can't be man enough to apologize. [31:53] Your president is not man enough because he never apologized for anything. [31:56] So you think you should just jump in it with him? [31:59] He's your president. [31:59] Rise up to it. [32:00] I know. [32:01] You do use the whole you thing a lot. [32:03] Like, let's be not personal and accusatory about everything. [32:06] Did you vote for him? [32:07] I didn't, actually. [32:08] Would you like to know that? [32:09] Oh, that's loose to me. [32:09] Breaking news on CNN. [32:10] I've never voted for Donald Trump. [32:12] How about that? [32:12] That's loose to me. [32:13] That's going to be hot to me. [32:15] That's going to be hot to me. [32:15] Yeah, good. [32:16] It'll make it on media-like or whatever. [32:18] You got me there. [32:18] He's your president, too. [32:19] That is just for the record. [32:21] He's the president. [32:22] And your president.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →