About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Debate: Do Americans see Trump's Iran war as a quagmire?, published April 30, 2026. The transcript contains 2,189 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"The president has got himself in America stuck in a quagmire of another war in the Middle East. He's desperately trying to extricate himself from his own mistakes. My generation served in a quagmire in Iraq and Afghanistan. The way you stain the troops when you tell them two months in, two months..."
[0:00] The president has got himself in America stuck in a quagmire of another war in the Middle
[0:04] East.
[0:05] He's desperately trying to extricate himself from his own mistakes.
[0:09] My generation served in a quagmire in Iraq and Afghanistan.
[0:12] The way you stain the troops when you tell them two months in, two months in, Congressman,
[0:18] you should know better.
[0:19] Shame on you.
[0:20] Calling this a quagmire two months in.
[0:22] The effort, what they've undertaken, what they've succeeded, the success on the battlefield
[0:26] that creates strategic opportunities, the courage of a president to confront a nuclear Iran,
[0:31] and you call it a quagmire, handing propaganda to our enemies, shame on you for that statement.
[0:36] And statements like that are reckless to our troops.
[0:39] Don't say I support the troops on one hand and then a two-month mission is a quagmire.
[0:42] Who are you cheering for here?
[0:44] Who are you pulling for?
[0:45] Our troops are doing incredible work.
[0:47] He is calling people who criticize the war saying they're against the troops.
[0:52] Is that anywhere near fair?
[0:53] Well, he's saying that what their rhetoric is not matching reality and their rhetoric
[0:58] doesn't certainly help the war effort.
[1:00] I mean, it's not a quagmire.
[1:02] That is ridiculous.
[1:03] We've been there two months.
[1:04] Obama was in Libya for seven or eight months.
[1:07] I don't recall Democrats worrying about the word quagmire back then.
[1:10] And also Democrats, I think, have had a hard time grasping the mission, which Hague Seth
[1:14] was quite clear about today.
[1:15] The president's been clear about, which is we're not going to let Iran have a nuclear weapon.
[1:19] And Democrats and Republicans have traditionally agreed on this goal for a very long time.
[1:23] Now, it's only Trump who's decided to do something about it.
[1:26] The blockade is working.
[1:27] We're draining the Iranian economy.
[1:29] They've got nowhere to put their oil.
[1:30] A little patience here.
[1:32] And this may turn out with exactly what we want, which is Iran not having a nuclear weapon.
[1:37] That's the goal.
[1:38] That's what we're headed for.
[1:39] The people who think it's a quagmire are actually the American people.
[1:41] That is why the approval for the president's war effort is in the 30s, not the 50s, the 60s,
[1:47] like most military engagements, but in the 30s, because a broad majority of Americans are
[1:52] concerned about the costs of the war, but they're also concerned about these goals you
[1:57] just laid out not being achieved in any way, shape or form.
[2:00] We all want, we are all against a nuclearized Iran.
[2:04] Just to remind everyone, we had, we had a system where we had no nuclear, Iran had no nuclear
[2:11] access, no nuclear weapons.
[2:13] Pulse.
[2:14] No, they had no nuclear weapons.
[2:15] They have 970 pounds of enriched uranium.
[2:16] They do not have nuclear weapons.
[2:17] That is your lying when you say.
[2:19] Did they not have it?
[2:20] Did they have nuclear weapons?
[2:21] They did not.
[2:22] They have enriched uranium.
[2:23] They did not have nuclear weapons.
[2:24] And they are on the brink of having 11 bombs.
[2:25] That's what Obama left us.
[2:26] By the way, the brink, what is a brink?
[2:28] A year, two years, 10 years?
[2:29] Weeks.
[2:30] The experts say weeks.
[2:31] The issue right now is because of this war, the Iranians have something they never had
[2:37] before, which is a chokehold on the global economy.
[2:40] That choke, you're laughing.
[2:42] But you know what?
[2:43] You laugh at the pain that is causing people at the pump.
[2:46] It's causing farmers.
[2:47] I laugh at you.
[2:48] You're cheering for Iran now.
[2:49] Ridiculousness.
[2:50] I'm not.
[2:51] I'm saying nobody, actually the person who is, the people who have strengthened the IRGC
[2:55] are the people who have engaged in this war and given them the chokehold.
[2:59] You think they're strengthened?
[3:00] Yes.
[3:01] I think the IRGC is strengthened.
[3:02] Oh, my God.
[3:03] Actually, their hold on the Iranian people is stronger than ever.
[3:06] You know, if they were so weak, why wouldn't they have run to get a negotiation already?
[3:11] We are weeks into this with no final resolution.
[3:15] If they were so desperate, why haven't they caged?
[3:18] How long should it have taken?
[3:19] Three hours?
[3:20] Six hours?
[3:21] Nine hours?
[3:22] I don't know.
[3:23] It's not my military strategy.
[3:26] It's Donald Trump's military strategy.
[3:28] I mean, you may call it unbelievable, but people are suffering in this country.
[3:32] And I know.
[3:33] No.
[3:34] You know what's ridiculous?
[3:35] I'm sorry.
[3:36] What's ridiculous is that you laugh at the pain.
[3:38] You can hear your voice.
[3:39] Wish casting.
[3:40] Wish casting about outcomes.
[3:41] You laugh at the pain of Americans.
[3:42] Okay.
[3:43] Wish casting.
[3:44] I'm concerned about the people of America.
[3:45] Anytime somebody asks questions or makes a critique, to turn that into cheering for Iran,
[3:53] it's just as disingenuous.
[3:54] She said their IRGC is strengthened.
[3:55] Do you agree with that?
[3:56] You are.
[3:57] They are strengthened.
[3:58] They are strengthened.
[3:59] They are strengthened.
[4:00] They are strengthened.
[4:01] I know that there hasn't been regime change the way that Donald Trump wants to tell us
[4:05] there is.
[4:06] Exactly.
[4:07] I don't know if they are strengthened or not.
[4:10] I think when this is over, we will know.
[4:12] But I do know that asking legitimate questions, and I think a lot of the people in America
[4:17] have questions about what we are doing, what it's costing, questions that were asked in
[4:22] this hearing today, that doesn't mean you are cheering for Iran.
[4:25] That means you are cheering for America.
[4:27] Yes.
[4:28] And let me just say this.
[4:29] I don't think this hearing today served much of a purpose.
[4:32] I think we've gotten used to these spectacles and performances in Congress where there is
[4:38] a lot of screaming, often on both sides.
[4:40] It's often Congress people screaming at the person testifying and the person testifying
[4:44] screaming back at Congress.
[4:46] In this case, it was a lot more one-sided.
[4:49] It was Pete Hegseth doing most of the screaming.
[4:51] I think Pete Hegseth bringing up how long we were in Vietnam or Iraq may not be as helpful
[4:58] as he thinks to his argument because people have very bad memories about that.
[5:04] You know, I don't think we learned much.
[5:06] As an American people who want answers, I don't think we learned much.
[5:09] The president doesn't have the luxury all the time of making foreign policy decisions
[5:13] to weigh it against all gas prices and polling.
[5:16] When there is a threat, he has to act on it.
[5:19] He has to make a series of decisions that lead him to that.
[5:22] Right now, two months into this, we have had a ceasefire for over a week, and we are
[5:27] talking to the Iranians.
[5:29] We have a blockade that has now 23 ships parked in Iran.
[5:33] You know where that oil goes?
[5:35] It goes to China.
[5:36] It goes there.
[5:37] And that will be very interesting to see what happens in Beijing when Xi and Trump meet.
[5:41] Now, I don't know what him and Vladimir Putin talked about, but what I do know is this.
[5:47] Secretary Hegseth tried to just pump, now he obviously robustly defended the president,
[5:52] pushed back, made a bit of a spectacle, to be fair.
[5:56] And I think it's not wrong for liberals and other Americans to have questions.
[6:00] I think the administration should answer all of them.
[6:03] It's not just liberals having questions.
[6:04] No, I agree.
[6:05] And I said all Americans.
[6:06] But what I am saying is I don't believe hyperbole and using quagmire fits.
[6:10] By the way, let's just note, Scott, you brought up a great point.
[6:13] The economy is crashing.
[6:15] And the truth is the Iranian military is a mess.
[6:18] Right now, and noted in that Wall Street Journal article, when the economy collapses, the people rise up.
[6:23] And at the end of the day, we want the people to have control of that government.
[6:26] But the problem here is in the history of modern warfare, regime change is never achieved by air power alone.
[6:34] Right?
[6:35] The deterioration is.
[6:37] But neither are they achieved by...
[6:39] What about when you throw in the Navy?
[6:41] Does that help?
[6:42] Historically, it has not helped.
[6:44] We're destroying their economy.
[6:45] We're destroying their currency.
[6:46] Scott, Scott, just for one second, stop the talking points.
[6:48] Yeah, go ahead.
[6:49] So, look...
[6:50] The blockade is a talking point?
[6:51] Is it not really happening?
[6:52] Let's try to imagine what you would say if a Democratic president attacked Iran suddenly without making a case for war to the American people.
[7:00] That, you know, and did it without any allies.
[7:03] The problem is...
[7:04] You seem to be mistaken about my views on Iran.
[7:05] I think they're butchers and terrorists, and I think we're seven presidents too late.
[7:08] I'd have been happy for anybody to drop anything but pallets of cash on them, John.
[7:11] I think the Islamic Republic of Iran is a force for evil and obviously can't be allowed to be a nuclear power.
[7:15] Congrats.
[7:16] Welcome to the party.
[7:17] But what the strike was in June seriously degraded their forces.
[7:20] Agreed.
[7:21] The problem is that the United States all of a sudden joined Israel very quickly without any case for war being made.
[7:27] And now there is no plan to get out of this.
[7:29] It is easy to blunder into war.
[7:31] It is very hard to get out of it.
[7:33] And that's why our allies are saying, we're not with the U.S. on this because no case was made.
[7:37] That's why the war is unpopular at home, because no case has been made.
[7:40] And as Teddy Roosevelt once said, it is unpatriotic and servile to not criticize your leaders, even in a time of war.
[7:46] And I also think the fact is that Americans are paying for this war.
[7:50] They are paying.
[7:51] Gas prices went up again today to over 425 on average, over $100 barrels of oil.
[7:57] Now, people here, you can say that's no big deal to the American public.
[8:01] It's OK for them to bear that burden.
[8:03] It is a big deal.
[8:04] OK.
[8:05] Hold on.
[8:06] Well, I'm saying the point is here that people are bearing a burden.
[8:08] And I don't think Republicans who cheerlead are acknowledging that pain.
[8:13] The cost of the war is an issue with the American people.
[8:16] And I think always has been just looking at how much things cost in comparison with what the problems are in the country,
[8:23] which is why a lot of people and I think you can agree with this, Scott, why there are a lot of Republicans or those who were very diehard MAGA supporters
[8:32] are concerned, if not angry, about going into this war because the president did say no new wars.
[8:38] Let me let you hear.
[8:39] The Pentagon CFO says that the cost of the war has been about $25 billion so far.
[8:44] Let's listen.
[8:45] So approximately at this day we're spending about $25 billion on Operation Epic Fury.
[8:53] Most of that is munitions.
[8:55] There's part of that is obviously O&M and equipment replacement.
[8:58] We will formulate a supplemental through the White House that will come to Congress once we have a full assessment of the cost of the conflict.
[9:04] So you're saying the full cost at this point is $25 billion?
[9:07] Yeah, that's our estimate for the cost.
[9:09] Okay.
[9:10] Interesting because I'm glad you answered that question because we've been asking for a hell of a long time and no one's given us the number.
[9:15] So we're getting a number there and an answer there.
[9:18] To you, TW, is the cost worth it?
[9:21] Do you think that the American people will look at this and say this has been worth it?
[9:26] Well, I was glad to hear him say that a lot of that was for munitions replacement, especially after recent reporting and the Vice President saying I am concerned about it.
[9:34] We should all be concerned about it.
[9:36] There's a whole array of things that we have to deal with.
[9:39] But we've also spent how much in Ukraine?
[9:42] $300 billion over several years by some estimates.
[9:46] Look, Russia's a threat.
[9:47] I support Ukraine.
[9:48] We should support Ukraine.
[9:50] But this threat from Iran directly impacts the United States of America.
[9:56] And I'm sorry.
[9:57] I don't think imminent means it's sitting on a rocket launcher waiting to blow.
[10:01] And one of the great things I think that the Trump administration is pushing that wasn't in the JCPOA was ballistics.
[10:09] Making sure they can't get the technology to get it to our country and to our men and women overseas.
[10:14] Do you have that deal?
[10:15] Do they have that deal?
[10:16] That's what we're working on.
[10:17] Have the Iranians agreed to that deal?
[10:19] I mean, I hope they get that deal.
[10:20] We're trying to figure out who's in charge of so many of them.
[10:22] Okay, but we don't have a negotiating partner.
[10:26] So I think that's an issue here, which is you're laying out a series of goals.
[10:31] And of course, we all want to do nuclearized Iran and not having a nuclear weapon.
[10:36] But there is no assurance we're getting that at the end of the day.
[10:39] In fact, their most recent negotiating tactic is to open the Strait of Hormuz and just put the nuclears aside.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →