Try Free

Brooks and Capehart on the partisan redistricting battle

April 25, 2026 11m 2,145 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Brooks and Capehart on the partisan redistricting battle, published April 25, 2026. The transcript contains 2,145 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"the u.s justice department dropped its probe into federal reserve chair jerome powell after admitting it lacked evidence and voters in virginia approved democrats redistricting efforts for all of that and more we turn now to the analysis of brooks and capehart that is the atlantic's david brooks..."

[0:00] the u.s justice department dropped its probe into federal reserve chair jerome powell after [0:06] admitting it lacked evidence and voters in virginia approved democrats redistricting efforts for all [0:12] of that and more we turn now to the analysis of brooks and capehart that is the atlantic's david [0:16] brooks and jonathan capehart of ms now it's always great to see you both so the doj dropped its probe [0:22] as we said into fed chair jerome powell in part to clear a path to the for the confirmation of kevin [0:27] warsh is his successor uh but also because the federal judge effectively crippled u.s attorney [0:33] janine pierrot's investigation uh david what do you see as the takeaways who would have thought [0:38] lack of evidence hurts a prosecution uh you know i think first of all donald trump like every president [0:43] frankly would love to have a fed chair do what he wants because he can juice the economy at the right [0:48] time for the election trump was obviously the only one who would actually act on that and it should be [0:52] said we should appreciate the fact the federal reserve system is one of the crown jewels of our [0:56] country it was passed obviously in the progressive era but you look at greenspan what bernanke did [1:02] was miraculous i think powell has been an excellent fed chair the fact that we have these independent [1:07] agencies who are doing their job with civil servants doing their job is just something we should be [1:13] proud of and the fact that it's under threat and still under threat should still alarm us even if [1:19] we've had a reprieve on this the second point is that tom tillis the senator who was retiring who was [1:25] holding up the warsh nomination it would be interesting to see if other senators who are not retiring [1:31] start doing that kind of thing standing up to trump now there's approvals is in the 30s and not in the [1:36] 40s and i anticipate that a few more senators will do will discover some courage when it comes time to [1:42] standing up to the administration that they have lacked for the last eight years what do you think about that [1:47] jonathan is president trump's approval rating starts to soften do you think more republicans will [1:51] will use leverage wherever they can find it one can only hope um you know senator tillis he won this [1:58] particular war because he made it clear for weeks he's not voting for anybody's confirmation until that [2:05] lawsuit went away um and you know look give the give the president a little bit of props here in that he [2:14] just said okay fine fine the prosecution is over i'm going to get my guy in and maybe he will he will [2:20] do what i want him to do in interest rates but we'll have to take mr warsh at his word that he says that [2:26] he's not going to be a puppet of the president we'll see and pal's term ends next month does this episode [2:33] change the dynamics around his departure or the the search the the appointment the confirmation [2:40] the expected confirmation of his successor you know i well if you're powell you're worried that they're [2:47] going to come after you again and i think that's one of the reasons he's reluctant to leave uh because [2:51] he won't have some certain protections but i i think he he kept on doing his job no matter what [2:56] and this is a very tricky economy uh with inflation's rising and it was it was not expected that he would [3:02] be able to drive down inflation without a recession and he did it that's amazing and i thought what kevin [3:07] morsh is a pick the best possible pick that trump could have had i we i've seen him speak at [3:12] conferences for years and he's a serious guy who a normal republican might have picked which is not [3:18] always the case with the trump administration substantive guy so i think all things considered [3:23] that part of the government is in reasonably good shape and they have a gigantic new building [3:30] that is true look the fed has spent decades really trying to guard its independence from [3:35] political pressure has that wall held or has something shifted in all of this well it's held [3:40] in for all the reasons that david was just talking about but now it's going to be tested with um kevin [3:47] warsh and you talked about you know he's serious and substantive and that is all great right now but how [3:54] many serious and substantive people in the before times have gone into trump 2.0 and have done exactly what the [4:04] president wants to do that is in contravention of everything that they've said before and i'm [4:09] thinking specifically of secretary of state marco rubio in in in a lot of ways will a fed governor [4:17] warsh still be serious still be substantive and still have um being the good graces of the president [4:24] let's shift our focus uh to virginia because virginia voters this week approved a democratic [4:29] redistricting plan that could allow the party to pick up as many as four new seats in the upcoming [4:34] midterm elections david what do you take away from that result well as jonathan may recall i hate [4:39] this whole thing you know i hate it when texas did it i hate it when california did it i hate it [4:44] when virginia did it i believe in elections i would like there to be districts where both parties have [4:49] a shot of winning and the number of those districts in this country is now vanishingly small uh i understand [4:55] why the democrats did the republicans started it that's all fair uh but it we're just become a less [5:00] good democracy uh but for the republicans the lesson is be careful where you start and it's [5:07] weirdly like iran in in this case and in iran trump did not anticipate that the other side would take [5:13] some reaction he couldn't see like one step ahead i don't expect to see three steps at one step ahead [5:19] and so it was pretty inevitable once they did texas that california would do this and virginia would do [5:22] this and on net the republicans are probably worse off than they were before this whole thing started [5:27] the one thing i'll add and why democrats should should mute their enthusiasm is that 2030 is [5:33] coming and then you get real redistricting based on where populations are flowing and populations [5:39] nine out of the ten fastest states are republican states nine of the ten fastest shrinking states [5:43] are democratic states republicans are people are flowing to texas and florida and all those republican [5:47] states and it could be the case in 2030 even with all this the democrats will be in rough shape [5:52] because it'll be very hard for them to win the electoral college as the electoral college and house [5:57] votes go to red states yeah you mentioned florida jonathan florida republicans are apparently [6:02] considering redistricting and redrawing their maps what do you what do you make of this is this just [6:07] hardball politics or is there something more corrosive happening here yes it's hardball a hardball [6:12] politics and you know we have the the president to thank for it you know i'm surprised you did not um [6:17] maybe he's older than the singing demographic that you usually quote but i i think of james brown [6:25] and his song static and there's a great line in it that says don't start none won't be none and had [6:31] the president not gone to governor abbott and said give me five seats then you wouldn't have had governor [6:37] newsom jump out there and say oh wait what no we're going to do something so you know as much as we [6:44] we say that you know the president started this i want to give kudos to governor newsom for having [6:49] the backbone and the spine to stand up and say this is not going to happen as bad as gerrymandering is and [6:56] elections should determine who elected officials are when one side is trying to cheat before our [7:03] eyes we have to do something in response and i'm glad he did in the time that remains let's talk about [7:08] iran because president trump extended the ceasefire with iran but he also said he's in no rush and wants [7:14] to take his time is that measured patience or does it reflect the absence of a clear end game craziness [7:21] i mean he i thought he wanted off ramp uh and he doesn't seem to be asking he should be desperate [7:27] for it this is an issue that could destroy or severely damage the trump administration the way iran [7:34] contra severely damaged the reagan administration second this is weirdly turning into this the suez crisis [7:41] in 1956 the british it wasn't over the straits of hormuz it was over the the suez canal they said [7:46] they're gonna they're trying to block the canal we won't let them and then the white eisenhower in [7:51] the u.s said too bad too bad you're a weak power you thought you're a superpower those days are over [7:57] and a lot of people around the world are saying to the america you think you're a superpower you can't [8:01] even open the straits of hormuz your days of super hours over so donald trump should be eager to [8:06] get the hell out of this fight how do you see it jonathan um similarly i mean watching this whole [8:12] thing i've been confused from the moment the bomb started dropping on iran because i don't know [8:18] why specifically the president took this action i don't know what his game plan was has been or or [8:26] will be um it's as if he's trying to he thinks of a closing a diplomatic deal is the same as closing [8:33] a business deal that you can just do it overnight or one blustery performance and you know you [8:40] get people to the table to agree to your terms um that's not how this works i keep thinking about the [8:46] the iran nuclear deal the jcpoa you had five nations involved in this plus the european union i believe [8:52] and um it took months and months of negotiation i was like where's the wendy sherman where's secretary [9:01] carey where's um ernest moniz the secretary of energy these were all people plus the treasury [9:08] secretary these were all people who painstakingly negotiated the iran nuclear deal and instead what [9:14] we have from the trump administration is steve whitkoff and jared kushner who happens to be one [9:20] the president's son-in-law and two has major financial interests in the region how on earth does anyone [9:29] expect for the trump administration to come to a deal that will will be lasting in the interests of [9:36] the united states and that will put a lid on the damage that's being done in the middle east right [9:41] now and adding to the perceived confusion the secretary of the navy was also ousted reportedly [9:47] having nothing to do with performance in the field but because of his closeness to president trump and [9:52] uh over a shipbuilding dispute with uh pete hegseth secretary hegseth what does a leadership shake up [9:59] like that signal especially given that there's an ongoing naval blockade in iran well he was part of [10:05] the grown-ups uh he was he's a successful business person who probably knows how to run an organization [10:10] and probably had his own ego as successful as he's been to say like i kind of know what i'm doing i'm not [10:16] going to do a pete hegseth and do whatever donald trump tells me to do i'm not going to do a pete hegseth and be [10:21] basically be a buffoon on stage and so he tried to stand up for the strategy he thought was the [10:26] right strategy and that's that in the trump second term that doesn't get you very far i'm very struck [10:32] by it's not only people like him i'm struck by how many of the more intellectual trump supporters [10:39] are really upset about this he's lost a lot of people not only tucker carlson and people like that [10:44] but there's a writer named chris caldwell who in that world is probably the smartest and the most [10:49] intellectually sophisticated and they're all like it's not only this was a bad idea but even regular [10:55] trump voters are saying where's the thinking process here well you you had a red red line [11:01] and then you walked right through it david brooks jonathan capehart see you here next friday [11:07] take care have a good weekend support journalism you trust support pbs news donate now or even better [11:28] start a monthly contribution today

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →